Skip to main content
STAR Protocols logoLink to STAR Protocols
. 2023 Jun 28;4(3):102382. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102382

Protocols for transgenesis at a safe harbor site in the Xenopus laevis genome using CRISPR-Cas9

Yuki Shibata 1, Akinori Okumura 1, Makoto Mochii 2,, Ken-ichi T Suzuki 1,3,4,∗∗
PMCID: PMC10511863  PMID: 37389994

Summary

We have established a new transgenesis protocol based on CRISPR-Cas9, “New and Easy XenopusTransgenesis (NEXTrans),” and identified a novel safe harbor site in African clawed frogs, Xenopus laevis. We describe steps in detail for the construction of NEXTrans plasmid and guide RNA, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated NEXTrans plasmid integration into the locus, and its validation by genomic PCR. This improved strategy allows us to simply generate transgenic animals that stably express the transgene.

For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Shibata et al. (2022).1

Subject area(s): Developmental biology, Model Organisms, Molecular Biology, CRISPR

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • CRISPR-Cas9-based transgenesis into a novel safe harbor site in X. laevis

  • Faithful reporter transgene expression in a promoter-/enhancer-specific manner

  • Germline transmission of F1 siblings stably expressing reporter transgene


Publisher’s note: Undertaking any experimental protocol requires adherence to local institutional guidelines for laboratory safety and ethics.


We have established a new transgenesis protocol based on CRISPR-Cas9, “New and Easy XenopusTransgenesis (NEXTrans),” and identified a novel safe harbor site in African clawed frogs, Xenopus laevis. We describe steps in detail for the construction of NEXTrans plasmid and guide RNA, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated NEXTrans plasmid integration into the locus, and its validation by genomic PCR. This improved strategy allows us to simply generate transgenic animals that stably express the transgene.

Before you begin

We have established a targeted transgenesis method for Xenopus laevis, named NEXTrans (New and Easy Xenopus Transgenesis), using CRISPR-Cas9 (Figure 1).1 NEXTrans is a non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)-based targeted transgenesis method that generates transgenic X. laevis by co-injecting a preset NEXTrans plasmid that includes a 665-bp tgfbr2l.L fragment, recombinant Cas9 protein, and single guide RNA (sgRNA), which targets tgfbr2l, into fertilized eggs (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic comparison of the principle of transgenesis using REMI, I-SceI, and NEXTrans methods

Transgenic plasmids are randomly incorporated at multiple loci in the Xenopus laevis genome by the restriction enzyme-mediated integration (REMI)2 and meganuclease (I-SceI)-mediated3 transgenesis methods, whereas the NEXTrans plasmid with CRISPR-Cas9 is integrated into a novel safe harbor site, the tgfbr2l locus.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Schematic representation of NEXTrans (New and Easy Xenopus Transgenesis) at a novel harbor site

The NEXTrans plasmid carrying the transgene cassette is co-injected into fertilized Xenopus laevis eggs with Cas9 RNP targeting the tgfbr2l.L and tgfbr2l.S loci (exon 4). The plasmid integrates into the target sites in the zygotic genome in a forward and/or reverse direction by NHEJ repair during the early embryonic stage and can be detected by PCR. Primer pairs were used for PCR genotyping to detect the Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp) integration as follows: primers 1 and 5 for tgfbr2l.L forward insertion, primers 2 and 5 for tgfbr2l.L reverse insertion, primers 3 and 5 for tgfbr2l.S forward insertion, and primers 4 and 5 for tgfbr2l.S reverse direction (see key resources table).

Transgenesis by target integration has been applied in state-of-the-art strategies that have been used in animals after the post-genome era. They include cell tracking analyses, such as Cre/loxP and DNA barcoding system; large-scale and robust reporter assays; and functional analysis by strictly regulating the expression of transgenes, such as the Tet/On or optogenetic strategies.4,5,6,7,8 Controlling the copy number of the transgenes is required for these methods. Therefore, safe harbor transgenesis, such as that at the Rosa26 locus in mouse,9,10 is essential to establish transgenic animals in which the copy number can be controlled in Xenopus research. The biggest advantage of NEXTrans based on a safe harbor site is that it allows the implementation of these state-of-the-art technologies in Xenopus research. Additionally, because the NEXTrans plasmid, Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp), is now available, researchers can easily construct transgenic plasmids by replacing the cDNA cassette that contains the desired promoter/enhancer and gene of interest sequence with the fgk-egfp counterpart or by subcloning the 665-bp tgfbr2l.L fragment directly into another plasmid.

Institutional permissions

All animal care was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institutes of Natural Sciences and University of Hyogo.

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)
(3,000 U/glass ampoule)
ASKA Animal Health N/A
Serotropin (1,000 U/glass ampoule) ASKA Animal Health N/A
Penicillin-Streptomycin (10,000 U/mL) Gibco Cat#15140-122
Ficoll 400 Sigma-Aldrich Cat#F4375
L-cysteine Sigma-Aldrich Cat#C7352
Agarose Sigma-Aldrich Cat#A4718
Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate (MS222) Sigma-Aldrich Cat#E10521
10N NaOH Nacalai Tesque Cat#94611-45
Alt-R S.p. Cas9 nuclease 3NLS IDT Cat#1081058
Mineral oil Sigma-Aldrich Cat#M8410
2M KCl Thermo Scientific Cat#AM9640G
NaCl Wako Cat#191-01665
MgCl2・6H2O Nacalai Tesque Cat#20909-55
CaCl2・2H2O Nacalai Tesque Cat#06730-15
HEPES Sigma-Aldrich Cat#H4034
NaHCO3 Sigma-Aldrich Cat#S7277-250G
Nuclease-free water Thermo Scientific Cat#AM9938

Critical commercial assays

High-fidelity PCR enzyme, KOD FX Neo Toyobo Cat#KFX-201
High-fidelity PCR enzyme, KOD One Toyobo Cat#KMM-101
QIAquick PCR Purification Kit Qiagen Cat#28104
In-Fusion HD cloning Kit Takara Bio Cat#639649
CUGA®7 gRNA Synthesis Kit Nippon Gene Cat#314-08691
DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit Qiagen Cat#69504
GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep Kit Thermo Scientific Cat#FERK0502
D5000 Reagents Agilent Cat#5067-5589
D5000 Screen Tape Agilent Cat#5067-5588

Experimental models: Organisms/strains

Xenopus laevis (wild type, adult, male and female) National Institute of Basic Biology, Japan N/A

Oligonucleotides

In-Fusion tgfbr2l.L forward
5′-ACCTAAATTGTAAGCTGATTCTG
TGGATAACCGTATTACC-3′
This paper N/A
In-Fusion tgfbr2l.L reverse
5′-ATCTCGGTCTATTCTGGAATTCC
ACAAGGGGTACA-3′
This paper N/A
cmv:tdtomato forward
5′-AGAATAGACCGAGATAGGGTTGAGT-3′
This paper N/A
cmv:tdtomato reverse
5′-GCTTACAATTTAGGTGGCACTTTTC-3′
This paper N/A
sgRNA PCR primer 1
5′-AAAAGCACCGACTCGGTGCCA
CTTTTTCAAGTT GATAACGGACTA
GCCTTATTTTAACTTGCTATTTCTA
GCTCTAAAAC-3′
Shibata et al.1 N/A
sgRNA PCR primer 2
5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGAGCC
TTTGGGTCCGATACGTTTTAGAGCT
AGAAATAGCAAG-3′
Shibata et al.1 N/A
Primer 1(tgfbr2l.L forward direction)
5′-AAATATGGCACCTCCCTTCCAT-3′
This paper N/A
Primer 2 (tgfbr2l.L reverse direction)
5′-TTGGTGCTCTTGATGTCCCG-3′
This paper N/A
Primer 3 (tgfbr2l.S forward direction)
5′-AAACATTGACAAGAGTTGAACAGTG-3′
This paper N/A
Primer 4 (tgfbr2l.S reverse direction)
5′-CACCACATGGGGTACAGTCA-3′
This paper N/A
Primer 5 (eGFP)
5′-CAGGATGTTGCCGTCCTCCTT
GAAGTCGAT-3′
This paper N/A

Recombinant DNA

Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp) Shibata et al.1 N/A
Tg(NEXT-cmv:tdtomato) Shibata et al.1 N/A
Tg(NEXT-cryga:tdtomato) Shibata et al.1 N/A
pCS2-cmv:tdtomato Shibata et al.1 N/A

Software and Algorithms

Primer3 Untergasser et al.11 https://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/
ImageJ Fiji Schindelin et al.12 https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/

Other

Microinjector Drummond Scientific Cat#3-000-204
Micromanipulator Drummond Scientific Cat#3-000-024-R
Microneedle (3.5-inch glass capillaries) Drummond Scientific Cat#3-000-203-G/X
Stereomicroscope Zeiss STEMI 305
Fluorescent stereomicroscope Leica MZ10F
Puller for microneedles Narishige PN-31
100 mm Petri dish SANPLATEC Cat#TCD-100N
Gel electrophoresis equipment Advance M-2P
4150 TapeStation Agilent Cat#G2992AA
NanoDrop Lite Thermo Scientific Cat#ND-LITE-PR
PCR thermal cycler Applied Biosystems Cat#A37834

Materials and equipment

10× Marc’s Modified Ringer’s (MMR) stock solution

Reagent Final concentration Amount
NaCl 1 M 58.44 g
2M KCl 20 mM 10 mL
MgCl2・6H2O 10 mM 2.03 g
CaCl2・2H2O 20 mM 2.94 g
HEPES 50 mM 11.92 g
Deionized water N/A Up to 1 L
Total N/A 1 L

Note: Adjust the solution to pH 7.4. Then sterilize with an autoclave or 0.2 μm filter. Store at 25°C for up to 1 year.

0.1× MMR solution

Reagent Final concentration Amount
10× MMR 0.1× MMR 10 mL
Penicillin-Streptomycin 10 U/mL 1 mL
Deionized water N/A Up to 1 L
Total N/A 1 L

Note: Prepare this solution just before use. Store at 4°C for up to 1 month.

Injection medium

Reagent Final concentration Amount
10× MMR 0.3× MMR 15 mL
Ficoll 400 5% (w/v) 25 g
Penicillin-Streptomycin 10 U/mL 500 μL
Deionized water N/A Up to 500 mL
Total N/A 500 mL

Note: Sterilize the medium with 0.2 μm filter. Store at 4°C for up to 1 month.

De-jellying solution

Reagent Final concentration Amount
10× MMR 0.1× MMR 500 μL
L-cysteine 2% (w/v) 1 g
Deionized water N/A Up to 50 mL
Total N/A 50 mL

Note: Adjust the solution to pH 7.8 with 10 N NaOH.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Prepare the solution just before use.

10× Cas9 buffer stock solution

Reagent Final concentration Amount
2 M KCl 1.5 M 150 μL
1 M HEPES 0.2 M 40 μL
Nuclease free water N/A 10 μL
Total N/A 200 μL

Note: Prepare this stock solution under Rnase-free conditions. Store at −20°C for up to 1 year.

0.2% Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate (MS222) solution

Reagent Final concentration Amount
MS222 0.2% (w/v) 2 g
NaHCO3 16.7 mM 1.4 g
Dechlorinated water N/A Up to 1 L
Total N/A 1 L

Note: Store at 25°C for up to 1 month.

  • 1 M HEPES solution: add 23.8 g HEPES to 100 mL of deionized water and adjust to pH 7.5 with 10 N NaOH. Then sterilize with a 0.2 μm filter.

Store at 25°C for up to 1 year.

  • 100 U/μL Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) solution: dissolve HCG in 3 mL of 0.6% NaCl solution (supplied).

Store at −20°C for up to 1 year.

  • 0.2 U/μL Serotropin solution: dissolve Serotropin in 5 mL of 0.6% NaCl solution (supplied).

Store at −20°C for up to 1 year.

  • Injection plate: 100-mm petri dish coated with 1% agarose dissolved in 0.3× MMR.

Store at 4°C for up to 1 month.

Step-by-step method details

Preparation of NEXTrans transgenic plasmid

Inline graphicTiming: 1 week

This section describes in detail for the construction of the NEXTrans plasmid.

  • 1.
    Clone the DNA fragment including the 665-bp tgfbr2l.L genome fragment amplified from the NEXTrans plasmid (e.g., Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp)) into the plasmid needed to generate transgenic Xenopus using standard plasmid construction methods. The following step-by-step method summarizes the method for Tg(NEXT-cmv:tdtomato) construction as example.
    Note: For example, the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit; https://www.takarabio.com/assets/a/112472.
    Alternatives: Construct a transgenic plasmid by replacing the DNA cassette with the desired promoter/enhancer or cDNA of the gene of interest sequence with the fgk-egfp cassette in Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp).
    • a.
      Design two primer sets in the prepared host plasmid for inverse PCR (cmv:tdtomato forward and reverse primer) and the inserted DNA fragment including the 665-bp tgfbr2l.L fragment (In-fusion tgfbr2l forward and reverse primer) (see key resources table).
    • b.
      Amplify host plasmid DNA by inverse PCR and the tgfbr2l fragment with KOD One DNA polymerase (Toyobo; Cat#KMM-101).
      PCR reaction master mix
      Reagent Amount
      2× KOD One master mix 25.0 μL
      Plasmid DNA (up to 50 ng) X μL
      Forward primer (10 μM) 1.5 μL
      Reverse primer (10 μM) 1.5 μL
      Nuclease free water 22-X μL
      Total 50 μL
      PCR cycling conditions
      Steps Temperature Time Cycles
      Denaturation 98°C 10 s 10–20 cycles
      Annealing 60°C 5 s
      Extension 68°C 1 or 25 s
      Hold 4°C Forever
      Note: The extension time depends on the PCR product size; i.e., approximately . <1 kb, 1 sec; 1–10 kb, 5 sec/kb.
    • c.
      Confirm the PCR product size by electrophoresis. In this case, 768 bp of the inserted genome DNA fragment containing the 665-bp tgfbr2l.L fragment from Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp) and 5194 bp of the pCS2 host plasmid containing the cmv promoter and tdtomato cDNA fragments were amplified.
    • d.
      Purify the PCR products using a PCR purification kit (Qiagen; Cat#28104) following the manufacturer’s instructions (https://www.qiagen.com/jp/landing-pages/microbiome-rna-research-workflow/sample-disruption/qiaquick-pcr-purification-kit/).
    • e.
      Elute the PCR product with 30–50 μL of nuclease-free water.
      Inline graphicPause point: The purified PCR product can be stored at −20°C for subsequent experiments.
    • f.
      Mix the following reagents to obtain a 10 μL reaction mixture.
      Reagents Amount
      Purified pCS2 host plasmid (154 ng/μL) 1 μL
      Purified tgfbr2l DNA fragment (46 ng/μL) 1 μL
      5× In-Fusion HD Enzyme Premix 2 μL
      Nuclease free water 6 μL
      Total 10 μL
    • g.
      Incubate the reaction mixture for 15 min at 50°C.
      Note: Details may change depending upon the desired gene of interest and plasmid size and concentration.
  • 2.
    After transformation, confirm the plasmid insert sequence by PCR and Sanger sequencing.
    • a.
      Design some primer sets in the host plasmid and the inserted DNA fragment.
    • b.
      Confirm the PCR product size by electrophoresis.
    • c.
      DNA sequencing (in-house or outsourced).
  • 3.

    Use a plasmid DNA extraction kit to isolate plasmid DNA (Thermo Scientific; Cat#FERK0502) following the manufacturer’s instructions (https://www.fishersci.com/shop/products/fermentas-genejet-plasmid-miniprep-kit/FERK0502).

  • 4.

    Purify the plasmid DNA using a PCR purification kit (Qiagen; Cat#28104) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Note: This step is performed to avoid residues of ethyl alcohol, RNAases, and surfactants that can affect the viability of the injected embryos.

  • 5.

    Elute the DNA in 30–50 μL of nuclease-free water.

Inline graphicPause point: The purified plasmid DNA can be stored at −20°C for subsequent experiments.

In vitro synthesis of sgRNA targeting the tgfbr2l locus

Inline graphicTiming: 5 h

This section describes the amplification of template DNA and sgRNA synthesis.

  • 6.

    Prepare the following oligonucleotide set13,14 : sgRNA PCR primer 1 (5′-AAAAGCACCGACTCGGTGCCACTTTTTCAAGTTGATAACGGACTAGCCTTATTTTAACTTGCTATTTCTAGCTCTAAAAC-3′); sgRNA PCR primer 2 (5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGAGCCTTTGGGTCCGATACGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAG-3′). Underlined sequence is the T7 promoter and bold sequence is the tgfbr2l target sequence. Only this sgRNA set is used for targeted integration of the construct into the Xenopus genome during the NEXTrans procedure.

  • 7.

    Amplify the template by PCR according to the PCR-based sgRNA preparation strategy. We recommend using KOD FX Neo DNA polymerase (Toyobo; Cat#KFX-201).

PCR reaction master mix

Reagent Amount
2× KOD FX Neo buffer 40.0 μL
KOD FX neo 1.2 μL
100 μM sgRNA PCR primer 1 1.5 μL
100 μM sgRNA PCR primer 2 1.5 μL
2 mM dNTP 16.0 μL
Nuclease free water 19.8 μL
Total 80.0 μL

PCR cycling conditions

Steps Temperature Time Cycles
Initial Denaturation 94°C 5 min 1
Denaturation 94°C 20 s 10–15 cycles
Annealing 60°C 30 s
Extension 68°C 15 s
Final extension 68°C 1 min 1
Hold 4°C forever
  • 8.
    Purify the PCR products using a PCR purification kit (Qiagen; Cat#28104). Elute the PCR product with 30–50 μL of nuclease-free water.
    • a.
      Check the specificity of the amplification by agarose electrophoresis; PCR product size should be 117 bp.
    • b.
      Quantitate the concentration using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop).

Inline graphicPause point: The purified PCR product can be stored at −20°C for subsequent experiments.

  • 9.
    Synthesize and purify the sgRNA using an in vitro transcription kit based on T7 RNA polymerase (e.g., Nippon Gene; Cat#314-08691) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
    • a.
      Mix the following reagents to obtain a 20 μL reaction mixture.
      Reagents Amount
      Template DNA (150–200 ng) X μL
      5× Transcription buffer 4 μL
      0.1 M DTT 2 μL
      NTP mix 6 μL
      CUGA7 Enzyme (T7 RNA polymerase) solution 1 μL
      Nuclease free water 7-X μL
      Total 20 μL
    • b.
      Incubate the reaction mixture at 37°C for 2.5 h.
    • c.
      Add 2 μL of DNase I.
      Note: Make sure to add the DNase after transcription to remove the template DNA.
    • d.
      Incubate at 37°C for 15 min.
    • e.
      Add 578 μL of sgRNA binding buffer.
    • f.
      Transfer 600 μL of the solution to a spin column (supplied) for purification.
    • g.
      Centrifuge at 13,000 × g for 1 min at 4°C.
    • h.
      Remove the supernatant and add 750 μL of gRNA wash buffer.
    • i.
      Centrifuge at 13,000 × g for 1 min at 4°C.
    • j.
      Remove the supernatant and centrifuge at 13,000 × g for 1 min at 4°C.
    • k.
      Elute sgRNA with 30–50 μL of nuclease-free water.
  • 10.

    Quantify the concentration. Normally, 50–100 μg of sgRNA is synthesized. Divide the sgRNA into aliquots in the nuclease-free tubes. troubleshooting 1.

Inline graphicPause point: The sgRNA can be stored in aliquots at −80°C until it is ready to be used for injection mixture preparation (step 22).

Preparation of in vitro fertilization eggs

Inline graphicTiming: 3 days

This section describes how to obtain fertilized eggs and preparation of injection mixture.

  • 11.

    Inject 30 U (150 μL) of Serotropin into females 2–3 days before use.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: The egg quality is the most important factor for successfully generating transgenic animals.

  • 12.

    The day before fertilization, inject 450 U (450 μL) and 100 U (100 μL) of HCG into females and males, respectively. Keep all animals at 18°C thereafter. In our case, we injected the hormone 20 h prior to the desired time for egg laying.

  • 13.
    Sperm preparation.
    • a.
      On the morning of the injection, deeply anesthetize two males by submersion in a bath of 0.2% MS222 for 15–30 min.
    • b.
      After euthanasia, isolate the testes and keep them in a 1.5-mL tube on ice.
    • c.
      Just before egg collection, grind gently one side of the testes from the two males with a pestle and approximately 1 mL of 1× MMR.
  • 14.

    Collect 300–500 eggs by gently squeezing from two to three females and keep them in separate sterile Petri dishes.

  • 15.

    Add sperm solution to each plate and mix gently with pipette tips. Leave for 5 min at 18°C.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Start the count-up timer immediately to record the precise time after in vitro fertilization, because the injection step must be finished in the period 1–1.5 h after in vitro fertilization to reduce mosaicism.

  • 16.

    Soak the dish with 0.1× MMR for 15 min at 18°C.

  • 17.

    De-jelly the embryos with de-jelling solution containing L-cysteine within 3 min.

  • 18.

    Rinse the embryos with 0.1× MMR several times.

  • 19.

    Transfer the embryos into pre-cooled 0.1× MMR (11°C).

  • 20.

    Keep the embryos at a low temperature (11°C) to delay the first cleavage.

Note: To reduce mosaicism, inject Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) before the first cleavage.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: The first cleavage should occur after 2–2.5 h of incubation at 11°C. The embryos must be kept at 11°C in an incubator to control their development.

  • 21.

    Dilute stock Cas9 protein to 1 μg/μL with 1× Cas9 buffer just before use.

  • 22.

    Preparation of injection mixture. After transferring the embryos into an incubator, add 0.46 μL of 10× Cas9 buffer, 1 μL of Cas9 protein in 1× Cas9 buffer (1 μg/μL), 200 ng of sgRNA targeting tgfbr2l, and 50 ng of NEXTrans plasmid targeting tgfbr2l, and adjust the volume to 4.6 μL with nuclease-free water. The final concentration per egg is 1 ng of Cas9, 200 pg of sgRNA, 50 pg of NEXTrans plasmid. The Cas9 RNP and NEXTrans plasmid mixture must be kept at 25°C for at least 15 min. Prepare just before use.

Injection of Cas9 RNP and NEXTrans plasmid into fertilized eggs

Inline graphicTiming: 30 min for 400500 embryos

This section describes the injection setup, dose, and rearing method after injection.

  • 23.

    Make 3–6 lines of V-shaped grooves on an agarose-coated injection plate using a blade and align the fertilized eggs (embryos) on it. The eggs can be placed in any way during injection (e.g., agarose-coated dish or nylon grid).

  • 24.

    Prepare the microneedles using a needle puller (Narishige; model PN-31) with the following settings: magnet main 60, magnet sub 20, and heater 86.8. Break off the tip of the glass needle with fine tweezers. Then, set up a microinjector and fill the microneedles with 1–2 μL of injection mixture containing Cas9 RNP and NEXTrans plasmid.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: The needles must be fine to efficiently perform injections for genome editing.

  • 25.

    After 1 h of total incubation from in vitro fertilization, inject 4.6 nL of the pre-mixed Cas9 RNP and NEXTrans plasmid into the embryos. Complete the injections within 30–40 min.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: We recommend that this injection step be completed 1–1.5 h after in vitro fertilization. We found that injection in this period was the most efficient way of obtaining transgenic animals.

  • 26.

    Incubate embryos at 18°C for 3–5 h in a Petri dish with injection medium.

  • 27.

    Select injected embryos by transferring the embryos to 0.1× MMR at the morula or blastula stage because injection medium disturbs gastrulation, then store at 18°C. Using a fresh plate and rinsing multiple times are also recommended. Select normally developing embryos. troubleshooting 2.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Avoid a high density of embryos on the Petri dish (100 mm) for embryo health (up to 100 embryos in the same dish). The next day, transfer the embryos at 20°C and keep them until they reach stage 45; normally 3–4 days is needed.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: To improve the development rate, the 0.1× MMR must be changed every day and dead and abnormally developing embryos should be removed.

  • 28.

    Select the injected embryos with reporter gene expression. In the case of Xla.Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp), strong GFP signals were observed in the tail and gill at stage 45 (Figure 3A). The developmental stage can be judged by Nieuwkoop (1967).15 troubleshooting 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative transgenic X. laevis founders generated by NEXTrans

(A) Representative photograph of eGFP signals in Xla.Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp) in a promoter/enhancer manner. Strong eGFP signals were detected in the fin and gill.

(B) Mosaic transgenic Xla.Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp) embryo expressing eGFP only in the fin edge.

(C) Representative photograph of ubiquitous tdTomato signals in Xla.Tg(NEXT-cmv:tdtomato). Strong tdTomato signals were detected in the whole body.

(D) Half-transgenic Xla.Tg(NEXT-cmv:tdtomato) embryo expressing tdTomato signals only on one side of the body.

(E) Representative photograph of tdTomato signals in Xla.Tg(NEXT-cryga:tdtomato) in a promoter/enhancer manner.

(F) Fully transgenic Xla.Tg(NEXT-cryga:tdtomato) with tdTomato signals detected in both eyes completed the metamorphosis normally. Arrows indicate tdTomato signals in the eye; arrowheads indicate the gill; double arrowheads indicate the edge of the tail fin. Scale bars = 1 mm for (A–E) and 5 mm for (F).

Germline transmission

Inline graphicTiming: within approximately 1 year

This section describes the housing condition of transgenic X. laevis embryos.

  • 29.

    Rear the transgenic animals until sexual maturation.

Note: We recommend keeping the embryos that exhibit strong transgene expression in the gill and tail region, not those with half-transgenesis or spotted ectopic expression, for the case of Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp). In our case, we kept the transgenic animals in dechlorinated water at approximately 26°C for 8–9 months to accelerate animal growth.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Rear the embryos and froglets before sexual maturation at approximately 26°C. According to the housing method, it is recommended that X. laevis adults are reared at 18°C to maintain egg and sperm quality. However, low-temperature rearing delays the growth and sexual maturation of the embryos and young froglets.

  • 30.

    After 8–9 months, transfer all transgenic frogs to dechlorinated water at 18 °C at least 1 month before use.

  • 31.

    Obtain the F1 siblings by crossing sexually mature transgenic males and wild-type females using in vitro fertilization or natural mating.16

Inline graphicCRITICAL: We recommend using sexually mature transgenic males to generate F1 siblings because males reach sexual maturity faster than females.

  • 32.

    Check the transgene expression in the F1 siblings. In the case of Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp), eGFP-positive signals can be clearly seen in the gill and tail fin until stage 45. troubleshooting 4.

Genotyping by PCR

Inline graphicTiming: 6 h

This section describes a method for detecting the transgene by genomic PCR in F1 embryos.

  • 33.

    Rear reporter expressing F1 embryos to the stage at which the phenotype is to be evaluated and collect samples individually.

  • 34.

    Deeply anesthetize the embryos with 0.01% MS222 in 0.1x MMR, then euthanatize them for genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction.

  • 35.

    Extract gDNA from each sample using a silica column-based DNA purification kit (Qiagen; Cat#69504) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. https://www.qiagen.com/nl/resources/download.aspx?id=68f29296-5a9f-40fa-8b3d-1c148d0b3030&lang=en

  • 36.

    Elute gDNA with 30–50 μL of elution buffer, then use 1 μL for the following PCR genotyping template. Normally, 5–10 μg of gDNA is extracted from each embryo at stage 45.

Inline graphicPause point: The gDNA can be stored at −20°C for subsequent experiments.

  • 37.

    For the case of Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp), the NEXTrans plasmid can be integrated into the tgfbr2l.L and/or tgfbr2l.S locus in both directions, giving a total of four possible patterns due to NHEJ-mediated integration. Prepare PCR primers (primers 1–4) designed for each locus (host genome) region and a common primer (primer 5) designed for the eGFP (transgene) region in the NEXTrans plasmid to detect the integration site (Figure 2 and key resources table).

  • 38.

    Analyze the genotype by performing PCR genotyping of the gDNA. To detect the plasmid integration into the tgfbr2l locus, mix each of primers 1–4 with common primer 5. For PCR genotyping, we recommend using KOD One DNA polymerase (Toyobo; Cat#KMM-101) and the following conditions. troubleshooting 5.

PCR reaction master mix

Reagent Amount
2× KOD One master mix 25.0 μL
Genomic DNA (up to 200 ng) X μL
10 μM primer 1-4 1.5 μL
10 μM primer 5 1.5 μL
Nuclease free water 22-X μL
Total 50 μL

PCR cycling conditions

Steps Temperature Time Cycles
Denaturation 98°C 10 s 32 cycles
Annealing 60°C 5 s
Extension 68°C 30 s
Hold 4°C forever
  • 39.

    Visualize the size of the PCR products using an electrophoresis system with high resolution, such as TapeStation (Figure 4). Agarose gel electrophoresis for routine work is also fine.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Representative PCR genotyping for targeted integration of NEXTrans plasmid

PCR genotyping was performed using the primer pairs described in Figure 2 and key resources table to detect Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp) integration in tgfbr2l loci. The genomic DNA was extracted from F1 siblings (#2) generated by in vitro fertilization. Green arrowhead indicates expected PCR products, suggesting Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp) was integrated into the tgfbr2l.S locus in the forward direction. Samples 1–4, strong eGFP signals were detected in the gill and the edge of the tail fin; sample 5, wild-type (WT) tadpole. HM, high molecular weight marker; LM, low molecular weight marker in the TapeStation electropherogram.

Expected outcomes

Approximately 7% (33/477) of faithful reporter expression in the gill or fin edge was detected in F0 transgenic animals co-injected with Cas9 RNP (Figure 3A) and NEXTrans plasmid Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp) in a tissue-specific manner, as reported previously.1,17 Mosaic expression, weak but specific eGFP expression in only the gill or fin edge, was also observed in some embryos, probably due to the low integration rate (60/477) (Figure 3B). Targeted integration at the tgfbr2l.L or S locus was confirmed by PCR genotyping.1 Because the NEXTrans plasmid is integrated into the target site by error-prone NHEJ repair, the double-strand break ends of 5′ or 3′ junctions should be predicted considering various deletions and/or insertions.18,19,20 Additionally, a few copies are likely to be tandemly concatemerized in some cases. Thus, several different sizes of PCR genotyping products were detected in the electrophoresis images.1

To evaluate whether our improved method could be versatilely applied to X. laevis, we tested two NEXTrans plasmids carrying the tdTomato reporter gene driven by the cmv promoter (ubiquitous) or the gamma-crystallin promoter (eye-specific), Tg(NEXT-cmv:tdtomato) or Tg(NEXT-cryga:tdtomato). At the end of embryogenesis, approximately 12% of each group of tadpoles expressed strong tdTomato signals in a promoter-dependent manner in full- or half-transgenesis (Figures 3C–3F).1 Genotyping analysis confirmed that both NEXTrans plasmids were integrated into the tgfbr2l.L or S locus, which is consistent with the fgk results.1 These results also show that targeted transgenesis at a novel safe harbor site was achieved using NEXTrans.

We confirmed the germline transmission of the transgenes in F1 siblings from Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp), Tg(NEXT-cmv:tdtomato), and Tg(NEXT-cryga:tdtomato) F0 founders. In the case of fgk Tg animals, first, two F0 Tg males were outcrossed with wild-type females by natural mating or by in vitro fertilization. Transgene expression in the gill and fin edge was observed in 35.3% (82/232) and 59.1% (124/210) of offspring obtained by natural mating and in vitro fertilization, respectively (Figure 5A).1 Integration of the plasmids was confirmed by PCR genotyping (Figure 4). Second, cmv Tg males were outcrossed with wild-type females, and 71.4% (5/7) of the F1 embryos showed ubiquitous transgene expression in the whole body (Figure 5B).1 Finally, 60.9% (109/179) of F1 offspring generated from the cryga Tg males had tdTomato expression in both eyes (Figure 5C).1 The differences in the germline transmission rate among these embryos are caused by the germline mosaicism in each F0 founder. In all Tg cases, we successfully generated F1 Tg animals within 1 year in a short reproductive period, which is comparable to the germline transmission rate of X. tropicalis. Thus, NEXTrans is expected to contribute to the advancement of X. laevis functional genomics research. Furthermore, our study strongly suggested that the tgfbr2l site is a safe harbor site, like the ROSA26 site for mouse, for X. laevis transgenesis.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Germline transmission of transgenic X. laevis generated by NEXTrans

Representative photographs of F1 offspring of (A) Xla.Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp), (B) Xla.Tg(NEXT-cmv:tdtomato), and (C) Xla.Tg(NEXT-cryga:tdtomato) embryos. Arrowheads indicate the gill; double arrowheads indicate the edge of the tail fin; arrow indicates the eye with tdTomato signal. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Limitations

Unexpectedly, when transgenic X. laevis animals were produced using the Sox2 promoter/N2 enhancer sequence derived from the X. tropicalis genome,1,21 which specifically induces transgene expression in the central nerve system, mosaic or lower reporter expression was observed compared with that obtained with the other promoters. This finding may be the result of weak promoter/enhancer activity per se or low copy number of the integrated plasmid at the target site due to the principle of DNA integration by NHEJ repair. NEXTrans is based on NHEJ repair, and therefore the plasmid integration could be expected in up to two loci in the host sub-genome tgfbr2l.L/S with a single copy or few tandem copies. This may cause weak expression of the transgene in F0 mosaic animals when the copy number of the transgene is low in the target sites. Conversely, with the restriction enzyme-mediated integration (REMI) method, up to 35 copies of the transgene were predicted to be transcribed from the incorporated donor plasmid, which provides stronger transgene expression when a promoter/enhancer with weak activity is used.2 Therefore, if Tg animals generated by NEXTrans are likely to show inadequate reporter expression for the purpose (e.g., in vivo reporter assay), the REMI or ISce-I3 method should be considered because of the high copy number of the transgene. Lastly, we have not yet evaluated the performance of NEXTrans in X. tropicalis. However, because the tgfbr2l locus is located on chromosome 9 in both X. laevis and X. tropicalis, a model amphibian species with a diploid genome, NEXTrans may work just as well in X. tropicalis. If more safe harbor sites are discovered in the future, the NEXTrans method can be used to construct donor plasmids as was the case for the tgfbr2l site, and target integration of such plasmids into those sites can be performed.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

Insufficient CRISPR sgRNA is synthesized or obtained (steps 6-10).

Potential solution

Insufficient CRISPR sgRNA yield can be caused by secondary structure of sgRNA, insufficient in vitro reaction time, and/or a transcription kit that is not good for CRISPR sgRNA synthesis.

Possible solutions to increase the sgRNA yields include:

  • Design new sgRNAs.

  • Incubate the reaction tube for up to 4 h at 37°C (step 9b).

Recommended: use a highly active T7 RNA polymerase, such as the CUGA7 gRNA Synthesis Kit (step 9).

Problem 2

Most injected eggs fail to initiate development or die before gastrulation (step 27).

Potential solution

This problem can be caused by bad egg quality (e.g., distorted egg shape, high number of dead eggs, and/or low fertilization rate), a high amount of Cas9 protein, and/or sgRNA or target plasmid DNA is excessive for the generation of transgenic animals.

Possible solutions include:

  • Breed and keep females that lay good eggs in the researchers’ laboratory.

  • Use two to three females in the experiment to avoid females that lay poor quality eggs (step 14).

  • Recommended: inject appropriate amounts of the injection mixture into the fertilized eggs; 1 ng Cas9, 200 pg sgRNA, and 50 pg plasmid (step 22). Excess amounts of plasmid DNA (over 100 pg/egg) are toxic to X. laevis embryos.

Problem 3

Injected embryos develop normally, but weak or no transgene expression is detected (step 28).

Potential solution

Possible reasons for the inadequate expression include the following: the target plasmid is not integrated into the host genome because sgRNA or Cas9 protein lacks activity; the amount of injected plasmid DNA is insufficient; and/or the promoter/enhancer activity is too low to mediate transgene expression.

Possible solutions include

  • Recommended: use the Cas9 protein with multiple nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequences such as IDT Cas9 (see key resources table) to increase the efficiency of transgenesis.

  • Use Tg(NEXT-fgk:egfp) as a positive control to check if the injection is successful and/or sgRNA and Cas9 work properly.

  • Increase the amounts of the injection mixture; 2 ng Cas9, 400 pg sgRNA, and up to 100 pgplasmid DNA per embryo (step 22).

  • Use a different tissue-specific promoter with higher transcriptional activity.

Problem 4

No or low germline transmission efficiency in the F1 offspring (step 32).

Potential solution

This problem occurs when the integrated plasmid is not inherited by the germ cells.

Possible solution:

  • Rear the founder embryos that show as strong as possible reporter gene expression to generate the transgenic F1 siblings (step 28).

Problem 5

Most injected embryos develop normally and show promoter-dependent transgene expression, but integration is not detected by PCR (steps 38, 39).

Potential solution

This problem occurs when the PCR fails to amplify the fragment because inappropriate DNA polymerase and/or a large insertion/deletion is introduced at the junction between the host genome and the plasmid.

Possible solutions include:

  • Design new primers further from the junction than in the original design (step 37).

  • Try several DNA polymerases from fresh genomic DNA for the PCR (step 38).

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Ken-ichi T. Suzuki (suzuk107@nibb.ac.jp).

Materials availability

The NEXTrans plasmid will be deposited and released from the National Bioresource Project (NBRP) Clawed frogs/Newts at Hiroshima University, Japan. If the materials are needed soon, please contact K.T.S. (suzuk107@nibb.ac.jp).

Data and code availability

No datasets or code were generated in this study.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), KAKENHI Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (JP21H03829 to K.T.S.), Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (JP18K06266 to M.M., JP23K05834 to Y.S.), and Grants-in-Aid for Research activity Start-up (JP21K20667 to Y.S.); the National Institute for Basic Biology (NIBB) Japan Collaborative Research Program (22NIBB331 to M.M.); and the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), CREST program (JPMJCR 2025 to K.T.S.). The funding bodies had no roles in the design of the study; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; or in writing the manuscript. We thank Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing this manuscript.

Author contributions

Y.S., A.O., and K.T.S. carefully examined the protocol and wrote the manuscript; M.M supervised the work. All authors checked and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Contributor Information

Makoto Mochii, Email: mmochii@sci.u-hyogo.ac.jp.

Ken-ichi T. Suzuki, Email: suzuk107@nibb.ac.jp.

References

  • 1.Shibata Y., Suzuki M., Hirose N., Takayama A., Sanbo C., Inoue T., Umesono Y., Agata K., Ueno N., Suzuki K.I.T., Mochii M. CRISPR/Cas9-based simple transgenesis in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 2022;489:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2022.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kroll K.L., Amaya E. Transgenic Xenopus embryos from sperm nuclear transplantations reveal FGF signaling requirements during gastrulation. Development. 1996;122:3173–3183. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.10.3173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ogino H., McConnell W.B., Grainger R.M. Highly efficient transgenesis in Xenopus tropicalis using I-SceI meganuclease. Mech. Dev. 2006;123:103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2005.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Livet J., Weissman T.A., Kang H., Draft R.W., Lu J., Bennis R.A., Sanes J.R., Lichtman J.W. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature. 2007;450:56–62. doi: 10.1038/nature06293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Utomo A.R., Nikitin A.Y., Lee W.H. Temporal, spatial, and cell type-specific control of Cre-mediated DNA recombination in transgenic mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999;17:1091–1096. doi: 10.1038/15073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pei W., Feyerabend T.B., Rössler J., Wang X., Postrach D., Busch K., Rode I., Klapproth K., Dietlein N., Quedenau C., et al. Polylox barcoding reveals haematopoietic stem cell fates realized in vivo. Nature. 2017;548:456–460. doi: 10.1038/nature23653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Madisen L., Mao T., Koch H., Zhuo J.M., Berenyi A., Fujisawa S., Hsu Y.W.A., Garcia A.J., 3rd, Gu X., Zanella S., et al. A toolbox of Cre-dependent optogenetic transgenic mice for light-induced activation and silencing. Nat. Neurosci. 2012;15:793–802. doi: 10.1038/nn.3078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kvon E.Z., Zhu Y., Kelman G., Novak C.S., Plajzer-Frick I., Kato M., Garvin T.H., Pham Q., Harrington A.N., Hunter R.D., et al. Comprehensive in vivo interrogation reveals phenotypic impact of human enhancer variants. Cell. 2020;180:1262–1271.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Friedrich G., Soriano P. Promoter traps in embryonic stem cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice. Genes Dev. 1991;5:1513–1523. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.9.1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Soriano P. Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat. Genet. 1999;21:70–71. doi: 10.1038/5007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Untergasser A., Cutcutache I., Koressaar T., Ye J., Faircloth B.C., Remm M., Rozen S.G. Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e115. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., Preibisch S., Rueden C., Saalfeld S., Schmid B., et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nakayama T., Blitz I.L., Fish M.B., Odeleye A.O., Manohar S., Cho K.W.Y., Grainger R.M. Cas9-based genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis. Methods Enzymol. 2014;546:355–375. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.00017-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sakane Y., Suzuki K.I.T., Yamamoto T. A simple protocol for loss-of-function analysis in Xenopus tropicalis founders using the CRISPR-Cas system. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017;1630:189–203. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7128-2_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nieuwkoop P D. External and Internal Stage Criteria in the Development of Xenopus laevis. 1967. Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) pp. 162–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shaidani N.I., McNamara S., Wlizla M., Horb M.E. Obtaining Xenopus laevis embryos. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2021;2021 doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot106211. pdb.prot106211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Suzuki K.i.T., Kashiwagi K., Ujihara M., Marukane T., Tazaki A., Watanabe K., Mizuno N., Ueda Y., Kondoh H., Kashiwagi A., Mochii M. Characterization of a novel type I keratin gene and generation of transgenic lines with fluorescent reporter genes driven by its promoter/enhancer in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Dyn. 2010;239:3172–3181. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Auer T.O., Duroure K., De Cian A., Concordet J.P., Del Bene F. Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in zebrafish by homology-independent DNA repair. Genome Res. 2014;24:142–153. doi: 10.1101/gr.161638.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cristea S., Freyvert Y., Santiago Y., Holmes M.C., Urnov F.D., Gregory P.D., Cost G.J. In vivo cleavage of transgene donors promotes nuclease-mediated targeted integration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013;110:871–880. doi: 10.1002/bit.24733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shi Z., Wang F., Cui Y., Liu Z., Guo X., Zhang Y., Deng Y., Zhao H., Chen Y. Heritable CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted integration in Xenopus tropicalis. FASEB J. 2015;29:4914–4923. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-273425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Uchikawa M., Ishida Y., Takemoto T., Kamachi Y., Kondoh H. Functional analysis of chicken Sox2 enhancers highlights an array of diverse regulatory elements that are conserved in mammals. Dev. Cell. 2003;4:509–519. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00088-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets or code were generated in this study.


Articles from STAR Protocols are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES