Abstract
Background
Alternative splicing complexity plays a vital role in carcinogenesis and cancer progression. Improved understanding of novel splicing events and the underlying regulatory mechanisms may contribute new insights into developing new therapeutic strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC).
Methods
Here, we combined long-read sequencing technology with short-read RNA-seq methods to investigate the transcriptome complexity in CRC. By using experiment assays, we explored the function of newly identified splicing isoform TIMP1 Δ4-5. Moreover, a CRISPR/dCasRx-based strategy to induce the TIMP1 exon 4–5 exclusion was introduced to inhibit neoplasm growth.
Results
A total of 90,703 transcripts were identified, of which > 62% were novel compared with current transcriptome annotations. These novel transcripts were more likely to be sample specific, expressed at relatively lower levels with more exons, and oncogenes displayed a characteristic to generate more transcripts in CRC. Clinical outcome data analysis showed that 1472 differentially expressed alternative splicing events (DEAS) were tightly associated with CRC patients’ prognosis, and many novel isoforms were likely to be important determinants for patient survival. Among these, newly identified splicing isoform TIMP1 Δ4-5 was significantly downregulated in CRC. Further in vitro and in vivo assays demonstrated that ectopic expression of TIMP1 Δ4-5 significantly suppresses tumor cell growth and metastasis. Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 1 (SRSF1) acts as a onco-splicing regulator through sustaining the inclusion of TIMP1 exon 4–5. Furthermore, CRISPR/dCasRx-based strategies designed to induce TIMP1 exon 4–5 exclusion have the potential to restrain the CRC growth.
Conclusions
This data provides a rich resource for deeper studies of gastrointestinal malignancies. Newly identified splicing isoform TIMP1 Δ4-5 plays an important role in mediating CRC progression and may be a potential therapy target in CRC.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-023-01226-y.
Keywords: Long-read sequencing, Alternative splicing, TIMP1 Δ4-5, Colorectal cancer
Background
Alternative splicing (AS) is one of the most important mechanisms of posttranscriptional regulation, with over 90% of human multi-exon genes alternatively spliced [1, 2]. It provides the potential to generate diversity at RNA and protein levels, which largely enriches the cellular protein reservoir and contributes to temporal and spatial diversification of biological function [3, 4]. Besides being a critical mechanism during development and cell differentiation, alternative splicing is involved in multiple oncological processes, including angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis [5, 6]. Aberrant AS has been considered a hallmark of cancer, and systematic study of AS may provide potential biomarkers for malignancies.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies with a high mortality rate [7, 8]. Mounting evidence has unveiled that AS alterations are harbored within CRC [9–12]. Aberrant AS has also been implicated in CRC carcinogenesis. For example, ZO-1 pre-mRNA is alternatively spliced into two variants, ZO-1 E23 + and ZO-1 E23 − , encoding protein isoforms with different biological effects. Downregulation of ZO-1 E23 + contributed to the tumorigenesis and metastasis, whereas ZO-1 E23 − variant plays no functional role in tumor metastasis [9]. To determine the significance of AS in CRC, comprehensively describing the AS landscape and their biological/clinical implications is necessary.
To date, systematic identification of AS remains a challenging task [13]. The transcriptome complexity has been largely undermined because of technical limitations in systematic analysis. During the past decades, short RNA sequencing reads (≤ 150 nt) have played a leading role in transcriptome annotation [14, 15]. However, RNA-seq using short reads encounters severe limitations in reconstructing the full-length transcript and identifying isoforms with complex AS events. Obviously, transcriptome using long-read sequencing would be ideal for elucidating the AS landscape and the identification of full-length splice isoforms [16–18]. Recently, Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) has been widely used to analyze full-length splicing isoforms [19, 20]. Despite a relatively high error rate of the ONT long sequencing reads, this problem can be resolved by integrating matched short-read sequencing data using computational methods [21, 22].
In this study, a comprehensive AS landscape in CRC was detected using ONT long-read sequencing and Illumina short-read sequencing platforms. Thousands of unannotated spliced isoforms were identified and some of these novel transcripts were tightly associated with patients’ survival, which largely broaden our understanding of CRC tumorigenesis. Among these newly identified splicing isoforms, TIMP1 Δ4-5 transcript (exon 4–5 exclusion of tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinase 1) was significantly downregulated in CRC and suppresses tumor cell growth and metastasis. It has been documented that the full-length TIMP1 (TIMP1-FL) is an oncogenic transcript and plays a pivotal role in CRC tumorigenesis [23]. Therefore, mediating splicing isoform switch from TIMP1-FL to TIMP1 Δ4-5 would be necessary for CRC therapy. Mutations in the nuclease domain of CasRx can generate a catalytic ‘dead’ enzyme that retains RNA-binding affinity (dCasRx). It has been documented that recruitment of CRISPR/dCasRx systems (nuclease-inactive RNA targeting CasRx) to regulatory splice sites can induce isoform-switching splicing changes by interfering with the recruitment of splicing machinery [24]. To this end, a CRISPR/dCasRx strategy was employed to induce TIMP1 exon 4–5 exclusion in vitro and in vivo, showing promising therapeutic value of targeting TIMP1 alternative splicing in CRC.
Methods
Patient specimens
A total of 78 pairs of CRC cancer and adjacent normal tissues were collected from patients who undergone surgery between September 2012 and February 2014 at the Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou, China). Patient samples were collected with informed consent from patients, and experiments were approved by the ethics committees of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Tissue samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C after surgical resection. All of the specimens were verified by histopathology and none of the patients were received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Cohort details are provided in Additional file 2: Table S1.
RNA sequencing
A total of 78 CRC tumor tissues and 10 adjacent normal tissues were selected for RNA sequencing. Total RNAs were isolated using Qiagen R Neasy Mini Kit. RNA integrity and concentration were tested using Eukaryote total RNA Nano assay on BioAnalyzer (CHOP NAPCore). For long-read sequencing, Oxford MinION 1D amplicon libraries were generated according to the Oxford Nanopore community protocol and sequenced on R9 flow cells according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For short-read sequencing, total RNAs were subjected to ribosomal RNA removal using the Ribo-Zero™ Magnetic Kit (Epicentre Technologies). Truseq Stranded RNA sequencing libraries were prepared with 500 ng total RNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina). The libraries were sequenced in a 2 × 150 nt paired-end manner on Nova-Seq 6000 platform (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Long-read sequencing data quality control, alignment, and correction
Base-calling of MinION FAST5 reads was performed using albacore v1.1.0 and Guppy v3.3.0 with default parameters, and porechop v0.2.4 was used to trim the adapter of the ONT reads. Only reads passed the quality control by Nanofilter v2.8.0 were retained for subsequent analyses. The ONT reads were aligned to human reference genome hg38 using minimap2 v2.2.14 [25] in spliced alignment mode with the command ‘mnimap2 -ax splice’. The obtained reads were mapped to human genome using Minimap2 through “split-read” alignment. The ONT sequencing data statistics were performed with NanoStat v1.5.0. FLAIR correct module v1.5.0 was adopted to correct the splice-site boundaries of ONT reads [22]. All splice sites were evaluated for validity by checking whether they were supported by GENCODE v34 annotations or Illumina sequencing short reads. Spliced junctions were extracted from corresponding short reads, and only the junctions with ≥ 3 uniquely mapping short reads were considered valid. The corrected long reads were made up of reads with accurate splice sites supported by short reads. For transcripts containing novel splicing junctions, we mapped the short reads to the novel transcripts and ≥ 3 short-read support means that the transcripts have short-read sequencing support. For intergenic, intronic, and single-exon transcripts, if more than 3 short reads uniquely mapped to the transcripts, then the transcripts were considered as short-read sequencing supported.
Long-read sequencing transcript assembly
We used FLAIR collapse module v1.5.0 [22] to assemble transcripts based on the above corrected long reads with the default settings. Briefly, the assembling processes consisted of the following steps: (1) The TSSs and TTSs were determined by the density of the long-read start and end coordinates to construct the first-pass assembly. (2) 100-nt windows of end sites of each read were compared to find the most frequent site in the window (parameter: -n best_only). (3) The final ONT reference assembly was determined by aligning raw reads to the first-pass assembly using minimap2, retaining only the first-pass transcripts with ≥ 3 supporting reads with high alignment quality (MAPQ ≥ 1). As a result, a non-redundant merged transcriptome based on 78 CRC and 10 adjacent normal samples was created for further analysis.
Long-read sequencing transcript annotation and quality control
Our ONT long-read transcript annotation pipeline utilizing several tools was delineated in Additional file 1: Fig. S1. SQANTI3 v1.6.1 [26] was used to annotate the splice transcripts based on GENCODE v34. The SQANTI3 (https://github.com/ConesaLab/SQANTI3) also provided a list of quality attributes including CAGE peaks, poly(A) sites, NMD prediction and so on to help filter out potential artifacts and getting high-quality transcript annotation. Briefly, SQANTI3 was used to generate an indel-corrected GTF or FASTA files by realigning the transcripts obtained from the FLAIR pipeline to the human reference genome hg38, as well as to categorize transcripts into several types (FSM, NIC, NNC, ISM, antisense, genic, fusion, and intergenic) based on their splicing patterns based on GENCODE v34. The gene fusions were detected by Fusionseeker v1.0.1 under the default parameters [27].
Transcripts were filtered based on the following criteria to ensure their validity: (1) all splice junctions were supported by ≥ 5 short reads; (2) the transcript was detected in at least 10% samples (≥ 9 samples) based on long-read ONT data; (3) transcripts with unreliable 3’ end based on the following standards: ≥ 100 bp away from the annotated TTSs, having no overlap with the poly(A) site database which integrating 3’-seq data and curated poly(A) motif. Transcript-level or gene-level expression with transcripts per million (TPM) were calculated for each transcript or gene by Salmon v0.10.0 [28] for long-read data and StringTie v2.1.2 [29] for short-read data based on the reference CRC transcriptome generated by long-read sequencing data.
Protein-level characterizations of long-read sequencing transcript
The transdecoder v5.5.0 was utilized to extract ORFs from transcripts, and the minimal length of ORF to be at least 300 bp [30]. The obtained ORF sequences were aligned to the UniProt (release 2020_12) database using blastp v2.11.0 with E-value < 1e − 5. Moreover, we also mapped the predicted ORF sequences to the PFAM v31.0 database with hmmer v3.2.1 using default options [31]. As a result, the single best ORFs for each transcript were selected based on blastp and hmmer results. The phyloP and phastCons scores of novel transcripts were calculated using bigWigAverageOverBed v377 with phyloP and phastCons data of 100 vertebrate species from UCSC, respectively.
We downloaded raw MS/MS data of CRC cancer patients (97 tumors, 100 adjacent normal tissues) from the CPTAC database (https://cptac-data-portal.georgetown.edu/study-summary/S037). Peptide identification was performed using Maxquant v1.6.10.43 [32] with a comprehensive sequence dataset by integrating long-read predicted ORFs and curated human protein sequences from the Uniprot database. The following parameters were set for peptide searching: (1) Carbamidomethylation (C) was set as a fixed modification; (2) Oxidation (M), Deamidated (NQ), and Acetyl (K) were selected as variable modifications; (3) The peptide mass tolerances were set as < 20 and 4.5 ppm for the first search and main search, respectively. (4) The peptide length was set as ≥ 7 amino acids (AAs) and the maximum peptide mass was 4600 Da; (5) Only one missed cleavage site was allowed; (6) Both peptides and proteins with FDR > 0.01 were filtered. Finally, protein groups were classified into three groups, namely ONT_only (peptides mapped to ONT transcript and not mapped to UniProt proteins), ONT + Uniprot (peptides mapped to both ONT transcript and UniProt proteins), and Uniprot_only (peptides mapped to UniProt proteins and not mapped to ONT transcript), respectively. The DeepLoc [33] and TMHMM [34] were adopted to predict the subcellular localization and transmembrane domains, respectively.
Short-read sequencing analysis
The quality control of short-read RNA-seq data was performed by FastQC v0.11.9 [35]. The low-quality reads and adapters were filtered and trimmed by using fastp v0.20.1 [36]. Then, all clean reads were mapped to the human reference genome hg38 using STAR v2.5.1 [37]. Specifically, a two-pass strategy was used to extract splice junctions from each sample. The short-read transcripts were assembled using StringTie v2.1.2 [29] with GENCODE v34 as reference.
Alternative splicing event analysis
We used SUPPA2 v2.3 [38] to calculate 7 types of alternative splicing events (ASEs) including A3/A5 (alternative 3’ and 5’ splice sites), AF/AL (alternative first and last exons), SE (skipping exon), RI (retained intron), and MX (mutually exclusive exon) by using the assembled long-read CRC transcript annotations. Specifically, we used the generateEvent command in SUPPA2 with –f ioe options on the GTF file assembled from the FLAIR and SQANTI3 pipeline previously. Then, the PSI (percent spliced in) levels of each ASE were calculated using psiPerEvent command based on the transcript-level expression matrix generated by StringTie and the ioe file generated by generateEvent. The ASEs were further filtered to generate high-confidence events by retaining events with an average PSI value ≥ 0.05 in ≥ 75% of samples. To detect differentially spliced events, Wilcoxon singed-rank test followed by Benjamini–Hochberg correction was used to detect differentially spliced events between normal and tumor samples. DEAS events with adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05 and | ΔPSI|≥ 0.2 were considered to be statistically significant.
Gene set and pathway enrichment analyses
The Hallmark gene sets which summarize and represent specific well-defined biological states or processes and display coherent expression are acquired from MsigDB [39]. The C2 curated gene sets which integrated online pathway databases and the biomedical literature were also acquired for further analysis. The R clusterProfiler v3.18.1 package [40] was used to assess pathway enrichment significance.
Construction of dysregulation networks between SFs and DEAS events in CRC
The difference of expression of SFs between tumor and normal samples were calculated using DEseq2 v1.30.1 [41] with raw reads as input, and SFs with |log2(Fold Change)|≥ 1 and adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05 were considered as significantly expressed. We then performed Spearman correlation analyses between the expression level of SFs and the DEAS event expression; SF-AS event pairs with Spearman correlation coefficients ≥ 0.5 (or ≤ − 0.5) and adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05 were considered to be significantly correlated. Then, the dysregulation network was built and visualized by Cytoscape v3.8.2 software [42].
Clinical outcome analysis
The univariate Cox model was used to evaluate the relation between DEAS events and CRC prognosis by R survival v3.2.7 package; DEAS events with adjust P-value ≤ 0.05 were considered significantly prognostic. Survival in patients with high or low DEAS events level was compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. We predicted the CMS molecular subtypes of each patient based on the transcriptome data by R CMScaller v2.0.1 package [43]. The MSI status of patients was based on the transcriptome data by R PreMSIm v1.0 package [44]. We employed the R estimate v1.0.13 package to characterize the stromal and immune cell infiltration [45], and then analyzed the correlation between CRC microenvironment and splicing alterations in CRC samples under the threshold of adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05 and |Spearman correlation coefficient r|≥ 0.5.
Cell culture
Human CRC cell lines (SW620, SW480, LoVo, HCT-8, HCT116) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA), and human CRC epithelial cell line NCM-460 was obtained from IN CELL (San Antonio, TX, USA). NCM-460, HCT-8, SW620, and SW480 were maintained in RPMI-1640 (Genom, China) medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). HCT116 was cultured in McCoy’s 5A medium (Genom, China), LoVo was cultured in F-12 K medium (Genom, China), and all above medium were supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, USA) and penicillin/streptomycin. All cell lines were cultured at 37 °C in humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells were routinely tested and had negative results for mycoplasma.
RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and qRT-PCR
Cell samples were lysed using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Tissue samples were grounded to fine powder in liquid nitrogen and lysed using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription of RNA to cDNA was performed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction kit (Vazyme). qRT-PCR using SYBR Green (Vazyme) was performed on a LightCycler 480 instrument (Roche). The mRNA levels of human genes or mouse genes were assessed by qRT-PCR. Each qRT-PCR reaction was independently repeated at least three times to ensure reproducibility. The data were analyzed by 2−ΔΔCT method. The primers for qRT-PCR were designed by online tool (Sigma) as indicated in Table S17.
Western blotting
For western blotting, cells were harvested in cold PBS and lysed in cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris at pH 7.5, 1% TritonX-100, 0.5% deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA) containing protein inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies and HRP-conjugated secondary antibody. The following antibodies were used: anti-human TIMP1 (1:1000, 16,644–1-AP, Proteintech), anti-human SRSF1 (1:1000, 12,929–2-AP, Proteintech), anti-human β-actin (1:1000, A5441, Sigma) and HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000, Thermo Scientific).
Plasmids, siRNAs, and transfection
Full-length human TIMP1 and TIMP1 Δ4-5 were amplified from total RNA by RT-PCR and cloned into the pCS2 + vector. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) corresponding to the following sequences for knockdown of SRSF1 and TIMP1 Δ4-5 were synthesized by GenePharma (Shanghai, China): 5′-AGGACAUUGAGGACGUGUUTT-3′ for siSRSF1#l, 5′-GAAAGAAGAUAUGACCUAUTT -3′ for siSRSF1#2; 5′-UGGAUAAACAGGGAAACACCU-3′ for siTIMP1 Δ4-5. Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, 11,668,019, USA) was used for transient transfection according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Construction of stable cell line
To generate cells stably expressing TIMP1 Δ4-5, TIMP1 Δ4-5 were amplified from cDNA and cloned into the pLVX-Puro vector. HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated lentivirus expression vector and viral packaging constructs. Transient plasmid transfection was carried out with PolyJet (SignaGen Laboratories) DNA transfection reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The viral medium was collected, filtered, and mixed with 1 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma) to infect the target cells. After 24 h infection, cells were treated with 1 mg/mL of puromycin (Thermo Scientific) for 1 week. The efficiency of upregulation was assessed by immunoblotting or qRT-PCR.
Cell proliferation
For MTT assay, cancer cells were seeded in 96-well plates for the indicated times (0, 24, 48, 72, or 96 h), and relative cell number was measured 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (Sigma) as described previously. For colony formation experiment, cancer cells were seeded in 35-mm-diameter dishes at a density of 1 × 103 cells and incubated for 1 to 2 weeks until the colonies were visible to the naked eye. The colonies were stained with 0.5% crystal violet (Sigma) in 20% ethanol for 10 min and quantified by ImageJ software.
Cell migration and invasion
For migration assay, 2.5 × 105 cancer cells were suspended in 100 μl medium with 1% FBS were seeded in the upper chamber of transwell chambers (8 μm pores, Corning, USA), and 800 μl fresh medium with 10% FBS were added to the lower chamber. For invasion assay, 2.5 × 105 cells were seeded in upper chamber pre-coated with Matrigel (8 μm pores, Corning, USA). After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, the cells in the upper chamber were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, followed by staining with 0.1% crystal violet. The migrated or invaded cells were quantified by counting in five fields (100 ×) under an Olympus IX83 optical microscope (Olympus, Center Valley, USA). Each experiment was analyzed in triplicates.
Generation of TIMP1 knockout cells by CRISPR/Cas9 system
To construct TIMP1 knockout cells by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing, a pair of targeting sequences (5′-AATTGCAGAAGGCCGTCTGT-3′) were cloned into our in-house modified one-vector system pEP330X as previously described. This plasmid was transfected into HCT-8 and SW480 cells for 48 h, and then the cells were seeded into 96-well plates for single-cell colony selection after 24 h treatment of 1 μg/mL puromycin. Following amplification of these colonies, individual genomic DNA was then extracted for Sanger sequencing analyses. The colonies with genome editing were further verified by western blotting with anti-TIMP1 antibody.
Targeting TIMP1 AS by using dCasRx system
The dCasRx plasmid was obtained from Addgene (No. 109050, four residues in two HEPN-nuclease domains of CasRx was mutated as R239A/H244A/R858A/H863A). The CasRx gRNAs were golden-gate cloned into the pXR003-CasRx-gRNA (Addgene, No. 109053) with BbsI restriction enzyme and T4 ligase, which had constitutive gRNA expression driven by a U6 promoter. The competent cells used to amplify plasmids were DH5α (Vazyme).
The cas13design (https://cas13design.nygenome.org) is a flexible tool that is specifically developed to design optimal gRNAs with robust targeting efficiency for CasRx. Importantly, the cas13design has considered several features that are crucial for efficient RNA knockdown, including crRNA folding pattern and secondary structure of the target RNA. Thus, in order to achieve efficient exon exclusion of a TIMP1, we applied cas13design as the tool to design optimal gRNA for this study.
RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP)-qPCR
The CRC cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and lysed in 1 ml RIP Lysis buffer (150 mM KCl, 25 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM DTT, Protease inhibitor (1:100), RNAase inhibitor (1:1000) on ice for 30 min. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g at 4 °C for 15 min. Ten percent supernatant was collected as input, and the remaining supernatant was incubated with anti-SRSF1 antibody or control IgG antibody that protein A/G conjugated magnetic beads (MCE, USA) in 900 μl RIP Lysis buffer at 4 °C for 4 h. Bound RNAs were immunoprecipitated with beads and wash beads with RIP buffer (150 mM KCl, 25 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100) four times. Then the beads were treated with 10 μl 10% SDS, 10 μl Proteinase K, and 130 μl RIP buffer for 30 min at 55 °C. RNA in IP or Input group was recovered with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction and analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. IP enrichment ratio was calculated as a ratio of its amount in IP to that in the input.
Animal models
All mice used in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Xuzhou Medical University. Female 4- to 6-week-old BALB/c nude mice were purchased from the GemPharmatech (Nanjing, China) and kept in SPF facilities (25 °C, suitable humidity (typically 50%), 12 h dark/light cycle), in which they can freely access to food and water. For xenograft tumor formation assay, SW480 cells (5 × 106 cells/per mouse) were injected subcutaneously into mice as described previously. After 3 weeks, mice were randomly assigned to groups given either TIMP1 CRISPR/dCasRx vectors (4 μg for each mouse) plus polyethylenimine (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) delivery buffer or control delivery buffer via intratumoral injection twice per week, gross weight and tumor volume of the mouse were measured every 3 days until sacrificed at 7 weeks. Tumor volumes were measured by caliper and calculated by using the equation: V = (L × W × W)/2, where V is tumor volume (mm3), L is tumor length (mm), and W is tumor width (mm). The tumors were isolated, photographed, and weighed. After being fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution for 2 days, the mice tumors were embedded in paraffin and sectioned for further analyses.
Results
Characterization of CRC transcriptome using long-read and short-read sequencing methods
To characterize CRC transcripts with high confidence, we utilized both ONT long-read and Illumina short-read sequencing platforms to resolve CRC transcriptomes (Fig. 1A). Our CRC cohort consists of 78 primary human CRC and 10 adjacent normal biopsies (Additional file 2: Table S1). We obtained an average of 7.92 million ONT long reads with an average read length of 1.02 kb per sample, providing a reliable resource for exploring transcript diversity of human CRC transcriptomes (Table 1 and Additional file 2: Table S2). The schematic representation of the analytical pipeline was constructed (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Over 90% of the long reads were mappable to the human genome, indicating their high specificity (Additional file 1: Fig. S2a). To validate the ability of ONT reads to recover full-length transcripts, we analyzed the percentage of full-length transcripts of human mitochondrial genes, which have a poly(A) tail and lack introns, resulting in fewer splicing complexities. The results revealed that nearly 60% of ONT reads of the mitochondrial genes were full-length, indicating that the ONT reads can recover most full-length transcripts that do not undergo alternative splicing (Additional file 1: Fig. S2b, c). The results demonstrated that these ONT reads can provide a reliable and valuable resource for analyzing CRC transcriptome complexity.
Table 1.
Tumor tissues (n = 78) |
Normal tissues (n = 10) |
Overall (n = 88) |
|
---|---|---|---|
All reads | |||
Average read number (million) | 8.17 | 6.04 | 7.92 |
Average length (kb) | 9.85 | 1.13 | 1.02 |
Median length (kb) | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.82 |
N50 read length (kb) | 1.09 | 1.33 | 1.11 |
Maximum read length (kb) | 1.89 | 7.69 | 2.55 |
Average read quality | 10.74 | 12.84 | 10.98 |
Aligned reads | |||
Average read number (million) | 7.84 | 5.88 | 7.62 |
Average length (kb) | 0.92 | 1.11 | 0.94 |
Median length (kb) | 0.75 | 0.92 | 0.77 |
N50 read length (kb) | 1.05 | 1.31 | 1.08 |
Maximum read length (kb) | 18.46 | 76.90 | 25.10 |
Average read quality | 10.81 | 12.84 | 11.04 |
Average percent identity (%) | 89.96 | 92.82 | 90.29 |
Median percent identity (%) | 90.68 | 94.03 | 91.06 |
The aligned reads generated by the ONT platform were then polished and assembled using the FLAIR pipeline [22], yielding an average of ~ 27,000 expressed genes with high confidence (Additional file 2: Table S3). Further quality control and transcript annotations were performed using SQANTI3 [26]. Finally, a total of 90,703 transcripts were identified based on a reference transcriptome (GENCODE v34) with a median transcript length of 2.5 kb (Fig. 1B and Additional file 1: Fig. S2d). These transcripts were mapped to 18,024 annotated genes and 2796 novel loci, and nearly 60% (12,271) of genes have two or more transcripts (Fig. 1C). Among the identified transcripts, 37% (33,913) were full-splice matches (FSM) perfectly matching known transcripts, and 40% (36,489), 17% (15,640), and 0.2% (215) were novel in catalog (NIC; refer to transcripts that containing new combinations of already annotated splice junctions or novel splice junctions formed from already annotated donors and acceptors), novel not in catalog (NNC; refer to transcripts that containing at least one novel junctions), and incomplete-splice matches (ISM; refer to transcripts that matching part of a known transcript), respectively (Additional file 1: Fig. S3a, b). In addition to these four transcript types, we also identified a fraction of other transcripts, such as antisense, genic, fusion, and intergenic types. However, we mainly focused on FSM, NIC, and NNC isoforms, which accounted for the vast majority (> 95%). Novel expressed transcripts (except FSM) account for 43 to 58% of all identified transcripts in individual samples (average = 53%, Additional file 1: Fig. S3a). The intriguing phenomenon is that about half of all identified transcripts are novel (NIC and NNC) in both tumor and normal samples (Additional file 1: Fig. S3b). We randomly selected several novel transcripts and validated them using qRT-PCT (Additional file 1: Fig. S3c). Overall, we identified thousands of novel transcripts in the CRC transcriptome that have not been annotated in the current reference.
To validate the reliability of long-read transcripts, we analyzed short-read RNA-seq data by mapping them to the long-read CRC transcriptome. We found that 84% of the FSM transcripts, 71% of the NIC transcripts, and 55% of the NNC transcripts were validated (Fig. 1D). Several NIC and NNC transcripts were validated using Sanger sequencing method (Additional file 1: Fig. S3d). We next used various orthogonal data to further assess the robustness of these transcripts, including CAGE (Cap Analysis Gene Expression, which measures the 5’ end of transcripts), 3’-seq (which measures the ploy(A) tail of transcripts), and some intrinsic sequencing properties. Benchmarking the novel transcripts against the FSM transcripts, we found that the 3’ ends of novel transcripts were supported by both poly(A) motifs detected by SQANTI3 and bona fide TTS (transcription termination sites provided by 3’-seq assays). The 5’ ends of novel transcripts also showed comparable quality to FSM transcripts (Fig. 1E). For example, our long-read ONT CRC transcriptome identified a novel CDA transcript derived from an alternative TSS (transcription start site), which is supported by proximal CAGE peaks. We also found PPIH transcripts with a novel TTS supported by 3’-seq (Additional file 1: Fig. S3e, f). For some intrinsic sequencing properties, all identified transcripts exhibited an extremely low rate of non-canonical junction usage and reverse transcriptase template switching artifacts (Fig. 1G). Most transcripts (33,271, 58%), particularly novel transcripts, were expressed in only one sample, and 3513 isoforms (6%) were detected in all samples (Additional file 1: Fig. S3g). Notably, rarefaction curve analysis revealed that the discovery of known transcripts reached saturation, yet the discovery of novel transcripts remained unsaturated (Additional file 1: Fig. S3h). Our study provides a high-resolution annotation for the CRC transcriptome.
Characteristics of novel long-read transcripts
Out of the 56,790 novel transcripts discovered, 36,489 (64%) were classified as NNC and 15,640 (27%) were classified as NIC, highlighting the intricate complexity of the CRC transcriptome. Interestingly, we observed a strong positive correlation between the number of exons and the number of novel transcripts, indicating that higher exon complexity leads to an expanded transcript repertoire (Additional file 1: Fig. S4a). Novel transcripts may be derived from new transcriptional start sites (TSSs) and transcriptional terminate sites (TTSs). In fact, novel transcripts with new TSSs were more likely to contain premature stop codons, which are associated with nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, novel transcripts tended to have more exons but shorter coding sequence. We also observed that NIC transcripts had longer transcripts compared to NNC transcripts (Additional file 1: Fig. S4b-e). The proportion of highly expressed novel transcripts was found to be lower than that of the reference transcripts (Additional file 1: Fig. S4f).
We next compared the genes and transcript expression levels generated by long-read ONT and short-read Illumina platforms. As expected, gene and transcript quantifications from long-read data were highly concordant with those from short-read data (Spearman correlation coefficient r = 0.666 for genes and 0.507 for transcripts, respectively; Fig. 2B). Further analyses indicated that the average expression level of novel transcripts (NIC + NNC) was lower than that of known transcripts (FSM) (Fig. 2C). We then conducted pathway enrichment analysis on individual genes with a high gain of novel splice isoforms, selecting those genes with a twofold increase for analysis (see Additional file 2: Table S4). Our results showed that genes with a high gain of novel isoforms are associated with cancer-related signatures, such as RNA splicing, TGF pathway, JAK/STAT pathway, and MYC pathway (Fig. 2D). Notably, oncogenes gained a substantial number of novel transcripts that may play an important role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Further analysis indicated that oncogenes were significantly overrepresented in the gene list with a twofold increase, while tumor suppressor genes were underrepresented in this gene set (Fig. 2E). Our analysis revealed that certain oncogenes, including CDH17, EZH2, and ERBB2, exhibited a higher number of novel isoforms (Fig. 2F). Several novel transcript isoforms were validated using qRT-PCR (Additional file 1: Fig. S4g). These findings suggest a potential role for these isoforms in CRC development and progression.
To evaluate the function of the non-coding regions of the genome, which comprise over 98% of the genome and are largely unknown, we assessed the evolutionary conservation of the novel non-coding transcripts. We used phyloP and phastCons scores to perform sequence conservation analysis and found that the novel transcripts had higher conservation scores than random control regions (Fig. 2G). To further characterize the identified novel transcripts that might function as putative protein-coding genes, we evaluated those transcripts with high coding potential. We extracted open reading frames (ORF, length ≥ 300 bp) via sequence homology analysis against the Uniprot database using blastp and functional protein domain prediction using HMMER against the Pfam database [31]. The results indicated that the majority of novel transcripts had the potential to encode proteins (Fig. 2H and Additional file 1: Fig. S5a). To determine whether long-read ONT novel transcripts can encode novel proteins, we compared the predicted ORFs to their closest match in the UniProt database. The results indicated the majority of FSM transcripts encoded ORFs were > 99% identical to the protein in the UniProt database (Additional file 1: Fig. S5b). In contrast, fewer ORFs encoded by NIC or NNC transcripts were annotated in the UniProt database, and a large proportion of ORFs was complete, suggesting that the long-read ONT method may provide much more information for CRC transcriptome.
Beyond transcript annotation, our pipeline leveraged existing CRC proteomics data from the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) project to validate our novel ORFs. We intersected our data by spectral matching novel ORFs encoded peptides with 97 publicly available CRC samples and 100 adjacent normal samples profiled by TMT10plex MS/MS proteomics. The results showed that 3729 NIC and 817 NNC novel ORFs encoded peptides were supported by LC–MS/MS data. Additionally, we also found 1883 annotated FSM transcripts producing novel ORFs not present in the UniProt database (Fig. 2I and Additional file 2: Table S5). Of all the ORFs with peptide support, we used the DeepLoc [33], a deep neural network-based tool, to predict the subcellular location of these proteins, with about half located in the cytoplasm or nucleus (Additional file 1: Fig. S5c). The TMHMM analyses showed that 606 novel ORFs had transmembrane domains, suggesting the important role of these previously undefined proteins (Additional file 1: Fig. S5d). Although validating novel transcripts with unique peptides is challenging, LC–MS/MS analysis detected the protein products of three selected novel transcripts (MSTRG.373437.7, MSTRG.17227.18, and MSTRG.42052.109) at their isoform-specific junction regions (Additional file 1: Fig. S5e). These results suggested that previously undetected transcripts can encode novel protein isoforms, which might play a role in producing neoantigens in cancer.
We next systematically analyzed the gene fusion based on the long-read ONT sequencing of CRC samples [27]. The results revealed that a total of 4538 fusion events were detected in our CRC cohort, of which the ARHGEF3-CNTNAP2, A2MP1-PTMA, and ACAT2-TCP1 fusion events were considered to be the frequent events in CRC (Additional file 2: Table S6). The majority of identified fusion transcripts have not been detected, which indicates the role of this “dark matter” in CRC, allowing for further investigation.
The landscape of dysregulated AS events in CRC transcriptome
We annotated the AS events based on ONT long-read data using SUPPA2 software [38] and quantified the levels of seven types of splicing events, including skipping exons (SE), alternative 3’ sites (A3), alternative 5’ sites (A5), alternative first exon (AF), alternative last exon (AL), intron retention (RI), and mutually exclusive exon (MX) categories (Fig. 3A). We identified a total of 2,363,976 AS events, with AF events contributing to the majority. Of these, only 565,952 AS events were identified using GENCODE v34 reference (Additional file 1: Fig. S6a). To obtain a reliable AS events dataset, we implemented rigorous filtration criteria (i.e., PSI frequency ≥ 75% and average PSI value ≥ 0.05). As a result, we obtained a total of 1,085,182 AS events, of which 352,238 AS events were identified based on the GENCODE v34 reference (Additional file 1: Fig. S6b, c). The UpSet plot revealed that 6725 genes have all seven types of AS events. It is also noteworthy that > 90% of genes have two or more AS events (Fig. 3B). The various combinations of these AS events largely enriched the diversity of the CRC transcriptome.
To explore the aberrant AS events that occur in CRC. Differential analysis was performed on AS events between tumor and adjacent normal samples, resulting in the identification of 25,002 differentially expressed AS (DEAS) events with an adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05 and |ΔPSI|≥ 0.2 (Fig. 3C and Additional file 2: Table S7). The majority of DEAS events were AF events (8898, 35.59%) (Additional file 1: Fig. S7a). There was no significant difference in the distribution of ΔPSI across seven types of AS events (Additional file 1: Fig. S7b). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on PSI values of DEAS events was able to distinctly separate tumor and adjacent normal samples (Additional file 1: Fig. S7c). Next, we conducted gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) on the parental genes that harbored DEAS events to determine their association with hallmark pathways. The GSEA results showed that genes with DEAS events were enriched in pathways such as G2/M cell cycle checkpoint, E2F signaling pathway, MYC signaling pathway, Mitotic Spindle, and MTORC1 signaling pathway (Fig. 3D). Intriguingly, different types of AS events were significantly enriched in specific pathways. For example, only differentially expressed AF events were overrepresented in the WNT signaling pathway, while the p53 signaling pathway was exceptionally enriched in RI events (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, we identified specific genes involved in MYC signaling pathways that underwent significant AS changes during tumorigenesis. For instance, EIF4H displayed loss of intron retention that was highly specific to CRC. YWHAE showed significant changes in alternative first exon usage between tumor and adjacent normal samples. XPO1 exhibited significant exon skip alterations in tumors compared to adjacent normal samples, while the alternative 3’ change of EEF1B2 showed a significant difference between tumor and adjacent normal samples (Fig. 3E). These findings suggest that DEAS events might act as complicated roles through interacting with multiple cancer-related pathways in CRC.
Splicing factors (SFs) have been documented to play pivotal roles in RNA splicing process, and a substantial portion of DEAS events was directly regulated by the differentially expressed SFs [46]. Among those previously curated 67 SF genes, we found that 17 SF genes were differentially expressed between tumor and adjacent normal samples (Additional file 2: Table S8). We then constructed dysregulation networks by calculating the correlation between expression levels of differentially expressed SFs and DEAS events (Additional file 1: Fig. S8a and Additional file 2: Table S9). In the dysregulation network, we found that 13 SFs (11 upregulated and 2 downregulated SFs in tumors) orchestrated thousands of DEAS events involved in various biological pathways. Notably, ELVAL3 and QKI were observed to modulate a greater number of DEAS events and pathways, indicating that they may play crucial roles in CRC (Additional file 1: Fig. S8b). The pathway enrichment analysis on the DEAS events regulated by SFs indicated that most pathways were significantly associated with cancer metabolisms, such as hypoxia, HIF1A signaling pathway, and Ribosome (Additional file 1: Fig. S8c). Overall, our findings demonstrate that SFs regulate both metabolism-related and other crucial pathways in CRC. In particular, SFs such as ELVAL3, QKI, RBM5, HNRNPA1, and SF1, which are at the center of the regulatory dysregulation network, may play pivotal roles in CRC carcinogenesis and progression.
Clinical outcome associated with alternative splicing events
Due to the highly variable features of AS events, we next explored whether their usage might highlight new prognostic biomarkers in CRC. We performed univariate Cox analysis to assess the correlation between the overall survival rate and each DEAS event. In total, we have identified 1472 DEAS events corresponding to 1241 genes that showed prognostic significance (Additional file 2: Table S10). Of these, 809 DEAS events were associated with a favorable prognosis, while 663 DEAS events were associated with a worse prognosis. Notably, we found 38 genes were identified having both favorable and worse prognostic AS events. The top 30 DEAS events corresponding to 27 distinct genes correlated with overall survival in CRC were shown (Fig. 4A). Intriguingly, four AS events of FHL were associated with overall survival. The skipped exon and alternative first exon of FHL2 were associated with a decreased survival time, while the other two alternative first exon events of FHL2 were associated with prolonged overall survival time in CRC patients (Fig. 4B–D). Overall, our findings suggest that DEAS events may serve as valuable prognostic biomarkers for CRC. The complexity of DEAS events in genes such as FHL2 may lead to specific isoforms during tumorigenesis and progression, highlighting the need for further research to elucidate the functional roles of different isoforms. Our study provides new insights into the close relationship between DEAS events and CRC prognosis, offering a promising avenue for future investigation.
To further investigate the dysregulation of alternative splicing in CRC. We analyzed the DEAS events between the advanced stage (AJCC Stage III + IV) and early-stage (AJCC Stage I + II) CRC patients. In total, we identified 998 AS events to be differentially expressed (adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05 and |ΔPSI|≥ 0.2, Additional file 2: Table S11). Furthermore, we analyzed the metastasis-related DEAS, and the result showed that 596 DEAS events were identified to be upregulated in CRC samples with distant metastasis, while 583 DEAS events were found to be significantly decreased (Additional file 2: Table S12). The microsatellite instability (MSI) was considered to be a robust prognostic and predictive biomarker to guide therapeutic decision-making including the use of immunotherapy [47]. We predicted the CRC MSI status based on the transcriptome data by PreMSIm [44], and the results indicated that 20 patients were predicted as MSS/MSI-L status, while the 58 remaining CRC patients were predicted to be MSI-H. Further analysis showed that 744 DEAS events were identified to be upregulated in CRC samples with MSI-H, while 633 DEAS events were identified to be significantly decreased in MSI-H patients (Additional file 2: Table S13), implying that alternative splicing dysregulation may be associated with immunotherapy response. These results suggest that dysregulation of alternative splicing is closely related to CRC progression and therapeutic choice, indicating that it may serve as important biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets.
Besides clinicopathological correlation, we also investigate the relationship between the molecular subtypes and alternative splicing. The consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) is a robust and useful classification system that allows to categorize CRC patients into four subtypes by transcriptome analysis [48]. The CMS classification system is significantly correlated with CRC patient’s overall survival rate and can guide therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice. Firstly, we predicted the CMS for each patient based on the transcriptome data by CMScaller [43]. Then, we analyzed the CMS specific AS events in different CMS subtypes. Each CMS subtype-specific AS event was defined as high level of PSI value in the subtype versus the remaining subtypes (adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05 and |ΔPSI|≥ 0.2). The results showed that a total of 4823 AS events were considered to be CMS subtype specific, of which 1579, 930, 1324, and 990 AS events were found to be highly prevalent in CMS1, CMS2, CMS3, and CMS4 CRC patients, respectively (Additional file 2: Table S14). Regarding CMS subtypes, it is well appreciated that tumor microenvironment including stromal or immunoinfiltration largely affected the CRC prognosis [49]. To analyze the correlation between tumor microenvironment and alternative splicing, we employed the estimate to characterize the stromal and immune cell infiltration [45], and then analyzed the correlation between CRC microenvironment and splicing alterations in CRC samples. The results showed that 237 AS events were found to be significantly correlated with stromal content, while 100 AS events were found to be significantly correlated with immunoinfiltration (adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05 and |Spearman correlation coefficient r|≥ 0.5), suggesting the potential role of alternative splicing in CRC microenvironment remodeling (Additional file 2: Table S15 and Additional file 2: Table S16).
Dysregulation of TIMP1 exon 4–5 splicing in CRC
Among those identified DEAS events, the PSI value of TIMP1 exon 4–5 was significantly elevated in CRC samples (Fig. 3C). The human TIMP1 gene spans approximately 4.4 kb and contains 6 exons. In this study, we found for the first time that TIMP1 gene can generate a new transcript by alternative exon skipping exon 4–5 (TIMP1 Δ4-5) based on our ONT long-read data (Fig. 5A). The PSI value of TIMP1 Δ4-5 was significantly elevated in CRC samples (Fig. 5B). To investigate whether TIMP1 isoforms with (TIMP1-FL) or without of exon 4–5 (TIMP1 Δ4-5) is differentially expressed between CRC and adjacent normal tissues, we analyzed their expression values using Illumina short reads data. The results showed that the mRNA expression level of TIMP1-FL was significantly upregulated in cancerous tissues, while the expression level of TIMP1 Δ4-5 was significantly decreased in CRC tissues (Fig. 5C, D). Moreover, the increased expression of TIMP1-FL was significantly associated with poorer overall survival, while the increased expression of TIMP1 Δ4-5 leads to better survival in CRC patients (Fig. 5C, D and Additional file 1: Fig. S9a).
To further validate the splicing role of TIMP1 gene in CRC, we designed three sets of primers. Primer set 1 covered a fragment spanning exon 3 to exon 6 to validate TIMP1-FL and TIMP1 Δ4-5 transcripts (Fig. 5E). Moreover, primer set 2, which covered the exon 3/exon 4 and exon 5/exon 6 junctions, was designed to quantify TIMP1-FL transcript. Primer set 3 covered the exon 3/exon 6 junction and was used to quantify TIMP1 Δ4-5 transcript (Additional file 1: Fig. S9b). Sanger sequencing results confirmed the presence of TIMP1 Δ4-5 isoform in both NCM-460 and SW480 cells (Fig. 5F). Further RT-PCR and qRT-PCR results showed that the expression level of TIMP1-FL was significantly upregulated, while the expression level of TIMP1 Δ4-5 was significantly downregulated in CRC cell lines (Fig. 5G, H). Importantly, we identified the same expression pattern in clinical CRC samples (Fig. 5I and Additional file 1: Fig. S9c). The ratio of exon 4–5 inclusion versus exclusion (TIMP1-FL/TIMP1 Δ4-5 mRNA) was dramatically increased in CRC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. The data suggested that dysregulation of TIMP1 exon 4–5 alternative splicing exists in CRC samples.
TIMP1 Δ4-5 and TIMP-FL have antithetical functions in CRC carcinogenesis
It has been documented that TIMP1-FL expression is correlated with tumorigenesis and metastasis of human CRC [23]. To investigate the individual contributions of TIMP1 Δ4-5 and TIMP1-FL in CRC, we overexpressed TIMP1 Δ4-5 and TIMP1-FL to CRC and we overexpressed TIMP1 Δ4-5 and TIMP1-FL in CRC cell lines. The overexpression efficiencies were confirmed by qRT-PCR (Additional file 1: Fig. S9d). Our findings showed that overexpression of TIMP1 Δ4-5 significantly suppressed cell growth, migration, and invasion of SW480 and HCT-8 cells, while overexpression of TIMP1-FL remarkably increased cell growth, migration, and invasion abilities of both SW480 and HCT-8 cell lines reduced cell migration and invasion abilities, which is in concordance with previous study (Fig. 6A–D) [23]. Conversely, we employed siRNA targeting exon 3/exon 6 junction to knockdown TIMP1 Δ4-5 expression in CRC cells. The results indicated that knockdown of TIMP1 Δ4-5 had no effects on TIMP1-FL expression. Knockdown of TIMP1 Δ4-5 significantly increased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities (Additional file 1: Fig. S9e-g). The data suggested that dysregulation of TIMP1 Δ4-5 may function as a suppressor of CRC carcinogenesis.
We also evaluated the in vivo effects of TIMP1 Δ4-5 overexpression on tumor growth in a nude mouse xenograft model, which showed that cells overexpressing TIMP1 Δ4-5 generated smaller tumors compared to controls (Fig. 6E–H). Collectively, our data indicate that TIMP1-FL and TIMP1 Δ4-5 play distinct roles in CRC carcinogenesis and that TIMP1 Δ4-5 may act as a potential tumor suppressor in CRC.
SRSF1 sustains the exon 4–5 inclusion of TIMP1 in CRC
To better understand how splicing factors regulate TIMP1 exon 4–5 inclusion, we used RBPmap (http://rbpmap.technion.ac.il/) to predict potential splicing factors that bind to TIMP1 pre-mRNA [50]. The result showed that TIMP1 exon 4–5 inclusion or exclusion is regulated by five splicing factors potentially (SRSF1, PCBP1, PCBP2, RBM45, and SRSF2, Fig. 7A). To confirm these findings, we individually silenced each of these splicing factors in CRC cells and performed RT-PCR to detect TIMP1 exon 4–5 inclusion. We found that knockdown of SRSF1 significantly increased exon 4–5 inclusion (Additional file 1: Fig. S10a). We then employed an anti-SRSF1 antibody to perform RIP assay in SW480 cell to determine whether SRSF1 directly binds to TIMP1 mRNA. The results showed that anti-SRSF1, but not IgG, directly binds to TIMP1 mRNA (Fig. 7B). We further silenced SRSF1 expression in SW480 and HCT-8 cells to investigate the expression change of TIMP1-FL and TIMP1 Δ4-5. Our findings showed that SRSF1 knockdown significantly attenuated TIMP1-FL expression but increased TIMP1 Δ4-5 expression compared to Scram knockdown cells, while total TIMP1 level remained unchanged (Additional file 1: Fig. S10c, d). Further analyses showed that SRSF1 knockdown remarkably attenuated the TIMP1-FL/TIMP1- Δ4-5 expression ratio at both RNA and protein level (Fig. 7C, D). Overall, these results suggest that SRSF1 plays an important role in regulating TIMP1 exon 4–5 inclusion and exclusion in CRC.
SRSF1 has been implicated in cancer progression [51, 52]. We herein investigated the expression of SRSF1 in CRC based on our sequencing data. Our analysis revealed that SRSF1 was significantly upregulated in CRC compared with adjacent normal tissues (Additional file 1: Fig. S10b), indicating its potential as a driver of CRC carcinogenesis. We silenced SRSF1 expression in SW480 and HCT-8 cells and observed a significant inhibition of cell growth, which was rescued by further knockdown of TIMP1 Δ4-5 expression (Fig. 7E). Moreover, transwell assays indicated that knockdown of SRSF1 markedly reduced the cell migration and invasion abilities, which were further promoted by knockdown of TIMP1 Δ4-5 (Fig. 7F, G). These results suggest that SRSF1 promotes CRC carcinogenesis via promoting the exon 4–5 inclusion of TIMP1 gene.
Therapeutic strategy by inducing TIMP1 exon 4–5 exclusion using CRISPR/dCasRx system
In this study, we utilized the CRISPR/dCasRx system to manipulate the alternative splicing of TIMP1 gene. Previous studies have shown that targeting the regulatory splicing site flanking the alternatively spliced exon with dCasRx can induce exon skipping [24]. To evaluate the position-dependent effect of different gRNAs, we designed six gRNAs mapping to different loci of TIMP1 pre-mRNA genomic location (Additional file 1: Fig. S11). We transfected dCasRx and each gRNA into SW480 cells and used RT-PCR to evaluate TIMP1 exon 4–5 exclusion after 48 h. The results showed gRNA#1 and gRNA#2 that located in donor and acceptor sites significantly reduced the relative TIMP1-FL/TIMP1 Δ4-5 ratio by nearly 50% relative to a non-target control (Fig. 8A). These results demonstrate that the CRISPR/dCasRx system was able to efficiently induce the exon 4–5 exclusion of TIMP1 in the in vitro cultured CRC cells.
We then investigated the potential of the CRISPR/dCasRx system in targeting TIMP1 alternative splicing. We employed transwell assay after transfecting dCasRx and gRNA to induce TIMP1 exon 4–5 exclusion. The results indicated that inducing TIMP1 exon 4–5 exclusion significantly inhibited cell migration and invasion abilities of SW480 and HCT-8 cells compared to the non-target control (Fig. 8B–D). Additionally, cell proliferation was dramatically inhibited upon dCasRx-mediated exon exclusion (Fig. 8E). We further tested this CRISPR/dCasRx-based strategy in vivo by administering subcutaneous injections of SW480 cells to the nude mice. After 1 week post-inoculation, mice received four intratumoral injections of either the TIMP1 CRISPR/dCasRx (dCasRx-TIMP1) vector plus delivery buffer or only the delivery buffer (Fig. 8F). Mice receiving the control delivery buffer exhibited relatively larger neoplasms, while those receiving the dCasRx-TIMP1 vector treatment showed smaller neoplasms (Fig. 8G-J). CRISPR/dCasRx-based strategy designed to induce TIMP1 exon 4–5 exclusion may have the potential to restrain the growth of CRC.
Discussion
Aberrant AS has been implicated as a hallmark of cancer development. However, the RNA splicing landscape of CRC has still not been fully explored [53, 54]. The identification and functional establishment of global AS events poses a formidable challenge. Recently developed long-read sequencing technologies are changing this situation [17, 18, 20, 21]. Several pioneering studies have reported unexpected transcriptome complexity using long-read sequencing technology [20, 55, 56]. In this work, we have generated long-read and short-read RNA-seq data to describe the AS landscape in human CRC. Long-read RNA-seq accurately detected full-length isoforms from start to end, revealing a rich diversity of spliced isoforms. Our findings highlighted the power of novel long-read sequencing approaches for transcriptional profiling.
To the best of our knowledge, our work represents the most comprehensive characterization of full-length transcripts and splicing isoform diversity in CRC yet undertaken. We identified a large number of novel transcripts that have never been annotated, which largely expanded the transcriptomic complexity. Notably, we detected novel full-length transcripts from several previously annotated genes, such as CTNNB1 and EZH2. Moreover, we demonstrated that oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes exhibited significantly different RNA isoform diversity in CRC samples, unveiling novel transcripts that may play important roles in carcinogenesis. By generating sequencing reads spanning the entire transcriptome, it is possible to systematically characterize the expressed RNA isoforms repertoire and comprehensively evaluate the prevalence of AS. Even due to the long-time storage of CRC samples, the RNA may suffer from slight degradation which leads to the relatively low fraction of full-length mitochondrial transcripts detected by ONT. We also investigate the coding potential of previously undetected transcripts by integrating the ONT data with proteomics data. The MS/MS data of CRC were obtained from CPTAC database, and most of the peptides have relatively small length (< 10 AAs), which is difficult to discriminate the protein from novel transcripts or known reference. Further methods may be used to improve the accuracy of novel coding transcripts identification, such as ribosome seq or RNC-seq. Our data confirms the importance of aberrant AS in CRC and highlights its role as an important mechanism underpinning gene regulation in human cancers.
Several findings are particularly striking. First, we discovered that the current gene annotations are still far from complete and the novel transcripts are likely to exist for a large proportion of expressed genes. For example, CDH17 exhibits a tenfold increase in novel isoforms compared to those currently annotated in existing databases. It has been shown that such incomplete annotation has a great influence on our understanding of tumorigenesis and metastasis. Our resource enhanced our understanding of CRC expressed transcripts repertoire. Second, we were able to highlight the extent to which AS events make a major contribution to isoform diversity in CRC. In particular, we show that AF is a relatively more prevalent form of AS type in CRC samples, which is contrary to previous findings based on short-read RNA-seq data [57]. Third, we highlighted the survival-related AS events based on the prognosis information of CRC patients. These AS events might serve as prognostic markers in facilitating patient outcome estimation.
In vitro and in vivo assays showed that overexpression of TIMP1 Δ4-5 significantly inhibits CRC cell growth and metastasis. Our further investigation suggests that SRSF1 promotes CRC carcinogenesis and progression by retaining the exon 4–5 of TIMP1. TIMP1 is frequently overexpressed in a wide range of cancer types, but it remains unclear whether aberrant alternative splicing of TIMP1 is involved in other cancers.
Our long-read RNA-seq data provided the first direct evidence that TIMP1 is alternative spliced at exon 4–5, demonstrating that TIMP1 exon 4–5 inclusion is a frequent event in CRC. Here, we found that the TIMP1-FL isoform, which includes exon 4–5, is upregulated in CRC tissues, while the TIMP1 Δ4-5 isoform, which lacks exon 4–5, is downregulated, suggesting an important role in CRC tumorigenesis. Further in vitro and in vivo assays show that overexpression of TIMP1 Δ4-5 significantly inhibits CRC cell growth and metastasis. Further investigation indicates SRSF1 promotes CRC carcinogenesis and progression by retaining the exon 4–5 of TIMP1. Studies on human cancers indicated that TIMP1 is frequently overexpressed in a wide range of cancerous types [58]. It remains unclear whether aberrant AS of TIMP1 is also involved in other cancer types.
Our study suggests that modulating TIMP1 splicing could be a promising therapeutic strategy for CRC. One promising approach to specifically manipulate splicing at specific site is splice-switching antisense oligonucleotides (SSO). However, SSO is expensive and difficult to set up, which also requires transfecting substantial modified oligonucleotides for an efficient splicing effect, reducing the feasibility in large-scale studies. Recently, it has been reported that catalytic dead mutant Cas13 family member, dCasRx, has shown promise for efficiently mediating alternative splicing patterns in a physiological context. By targeting regulatory splicing sites flanking the alternatively spliced exons, dCasRx can induce exon skipping or increased inclusion by most likely interfering with the recruitment of splicing factors. In our study, a CRISPR/CasRx-based therapeutic strategy to induce the TIMP1 exon 4–5 exclusion significantly inhibited neoplasm growth in BALB/c nude mice. Our findings demonstrate the potential of dCasRx as an efficient tool for editing RNA splicing and may be broadly applicable as a novel therapeutic strategy for cancer.
Conclusions
In summary, we have surveyed the landscape of CRC transcriptome using long-read sequencing method. Having observed substantial level AS events and previously unknown transcript isoforms, our results suggested that full-length transcriptome profiling reveals an underexplored area of research which can help the discovery of biomarkers and new drug targets.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We thank Shanshan Xie from Zhejiang University for providing the pcS2+ vector, and are grateful to Jiayu Zhang (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA) for help with editing the language of our manuscript.
Authors’ contributions
DD and JZ designed the study. QZ, YH, JH, JW, XM, QN, QZ, SL, QJ, LY, YL, and QZ acquired the data. QS and QN carried out the data analysis. DD and QS wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This project is supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0900900), Natural science funding for colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province (20KJA320007), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grants No. BK20220672), and the Training Project for Youth Teams of Science and Technology Innovation at Xuzhou Medical University (TD202008).
Availability of data and materials
The ONT and Illumina sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequencing Read Archive database (SRA, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) under the accession number SRP303779 (https://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/?view=study&acc=SRP303779) and SRP303082 (https://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/?view=study&acc=SRP303082), respectively.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou, China). Ethical approval for animal experiments was provided by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Xuzhou Medical University.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Qiang Sun, Ye Han and Jianxing He contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Qiaoming Zhi, Email: strexboy@163.com.
Junnian Zheng, Email: jnzheng@xzhmu.edu.cn.
Dong Dong, Email: ddong@xzhmu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Barash Y, Calarco JA, Gao W, Pan Q, Wang X, Shai O, Blencowe BJ, Frey BJ. Deciphering the splicing code. Nature. 2010;465:53–59. doi: 10.1038/nature09000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kornblihtt AR, Schor IE, Allo M, Dujardin G, Petrillo E, Munoz MJ. Alternative splicing: a pivotal step between eukaryotic transcription and translation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:153–165. doi: 10.1038/nrm3525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Keren H, Lev-Maor G, Ast G. Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:345–355. doi: 10.1038/nrg2776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen M, Manley JL. Mechanisms of alternative splicing regulation: insights from molecular and genomics approaches. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:741–754. doi: 10.1038/nrm2777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang Y, Qian J, Gu C, Yang Y. Alternative splicing and cancer: a systematic review. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:78. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00486-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu Z, Rabadan R. Computing the role of alternative splicing in cancer. Trends Cancer. 2021;7:347–358. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rougier P, Mitry E. Current treatment options for advanced colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol. 2000;27:30–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wan L, Yu W, Shen E, Sun W, Liu Y, Kong J, Wu Y, Han F, Zhang L, Yu T, et al. SRSF6-regulated alternative splicing that promotes tumour progression offers a therapy target for colorectal cancer. Gut. 2019;68:118–129. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen L, Luo C, Shen L, Liu Y, Wang Q, Zhang C, Guo R, Zhang Y, Xie Z, Wei N, et al. SRSF1 prevents DNA damage and promotes tumorigenesis through regulation of DBF4B Pre-mRNA splicing. Cell Rep. 2017;21:3406–3413. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhou X, Li X, Cheng Y, Wu W, Xie Z, Xi Q, Han J, Wu G, Fang J, Feng Y. BCLAF1 and its splicing regulator SRSF10 regulate the tumorigenic potential of colon cancer cells. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4581. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sakuma K, Sasaki E, Kimura K, Komori K, Shimizu Y, Yatabe Y, Aoki M. HNRNPLL, a newly identified colorectal cancer metastasis suppressor, modulates alternative splicing of CD44 during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Gut. 2018;67:1103–1111. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Feng H, Qin Z, Zhang X. Opportunities and methods for studying alternative splicing in cancer with RNA-Seq. Cancer Lett. 2013;340:179–191. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Steijger T, Abril JF, Engstrom PG, Kokocinski F, Hubbard TJ, Guigo R, Harrow J, Bertone P. Assessment of transcript reconstruction methods for RNA-seq. Nat Methods. 2013;10:1177–1184. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bisognin A, Pizzini S, Perilli L, Esposito G, Mocellin S, Nitti D, Zanovello P, Bortoluzzi S, Mandruzzato S. An integrative framework identifies alternative splicing events in colorectal cancer development. Mol Oncol. 2014;8:129–141. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tilgner H, Jahanbani F, Blauwkamp T, Moshrefi A, Jaeger E, Chen F, Harel I, Bustamante CD, Rasmussen M, Snyder MP. Comprehensive transcriptome analysis using synthetic long-read sequencing reveals molecular co-association of distant splicing events. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:736–742. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Au KF, Sebastiano V, Afshar PT, Durruthy JD, Lee L, Williams BA, van Bakel H, Schadt EE, Reijo-Pera RA, Underwood JG, Wong WH. Characterization of the human ESC transcriptome by hybrid sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E4821–4830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320101110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sharon D, Tilgner H, Grubert F, Snyder M. A single-molecule long-read survey of the human transcriptome. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:1009–1014. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Loman NJ, Watson M. Successful test launch for nanopore sequencing. Nat Methods. 2015;12:303–304. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li R, Ren X, Ding Q, Bi Y, Xie D, Zhao Z. Direct full-length RNA sequencing reveals unexpected transcriptome complexity during Caenorhabditis elegans development. Genome Res. 2020;30:287–298. doi: 10.1101/gr.251512.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Byrne A, Beaudin AE, Olsen HE, Jain M, Cole C, Palmer T, DuBois RM, Forsberg EC, Akeson M, Vollmers C. Nanopore long-read RNAseq reveals widespread transcriptional variation among the surface receptors of individual B cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8:16027. doi: 10.1038/ncomms16027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tang AD, Soulette CM, van Baren MJ, Hart K, Hrabeta-Robinson E, Wu CJ, Brooks AN. Full-length transcript characterization of SF3B1 mutation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia reveals downregulation of retained introns. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1438. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15171-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Song G, Xu S, Zhang H, Wang Y, Xiao C, Jiang T, Wu L, Zhang T, Sun X, Zhong L, et al. TIMP1 is a prognostic marker for the progression and metastasis of colon cancer through FAK-PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016;35:148. doi: 10.1186/s13046-016-0427-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Konermann S, Lotfy P, Brideau NJ, Oki J, Shokhirev MN, Hsu PD. Transcriptome engineering with RNA-targeting type VI-D CRISPR Effectors. Cell. 2018;173(665–676):e614. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:3094–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tardaguila M, de la Fuente L, Marti C, Pereira C, Pardo-Palacios FJ, Del Risco H, Ferrell M, Mellado M, Macchietto M, Verheggen K, et al. SQANTI: extensive characterization of long-read transcript sequences for quality control in full-length transcriptome identification and quantification. Genome Res. 2018;23(3):396–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Chen Y, Wang Y, Chen W, Tan Z, Song Y. Human Genome Structural Variation C, Chen H, Chong Z: Gene fusion detection and characterization in long-read cancer transcriptome sequencing data with FusionSeeker. Cancer Res. 2023;83:28–33. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-1628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14:417–419. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kovaka S, Zimin AV, Pertea GM, Razaghi R, Salzberg SL, Pertea M. Transcriptome assembly from long-read RNA-seq alignments with StringTie2. Genome Biol. 2019;20:278. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1910-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, Couger MB, Eccles D, Li B, Lieber M, et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:1494–1512. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mistry J, Chuguransky S, Williams L, Qureshi M, Salazar GA, Sonnhammer ELL, Tosatto SCE, Paladin L, Raj S, Richardson LJ, et al. Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D412–D419. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tyanova S, Temu T, Cox J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:2301–2319. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.AlmagroArmenteros JJ, Sonderby CK, Sonderby SK, Nielsen H, Winther O. DeepLoc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using deep learning. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:3387–3395. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.de Sena Brandine G, Smith AD. Falco: high-speed FastQC emulation for quality control of sequencing data. F1000Res. 2019, 8:1874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Trincado JL, Entizne JC, Hysenaj G, Singh B, Skalic M, Elliott DJ, Eyras E. SUPPA2: fast, accurate, and uncertainty-aware differential splicing analysis across multiple conditions. Genome Biol. 2018;19:40. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1417-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdottir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP, Tamayo P. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 2015;1:417–425. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16:284–287. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Eide PW, Bruun J, Lothe RA, Sveen A. CMScaller: an R package for consensus molecular subtyping of colorectal cancer pre-clinical models. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16747-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Li L, Feng Q, Wang X. PreMSIm: an R package for predicting microsatellite instability from the expression profiling of a gene panel in cancer. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020;18:668–675. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yoshihara K, Shahmoradgoli M, Martinez E, Vegesna R, Kim H, Torres-Garcia W, Trevino V, Shen H, Laird PW, Levine DA, et al. Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2612. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang ET, Sandberg R, Luo S, Khrebtukova I, Zhang L, Mayr C, Kingsmore SF, Schroth GP, Burge CB. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature. 2008;456:470–476. doi: 10.1038/nature07509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vilar E, Gruber SB. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-the stable evidence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7:153–162. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dienstmann R, Vermeulen L, Guinney J, Kopetz S, Tejpar S, Tabernero J. Consensus molecular subtypes and the evolution of precision medicine in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:79–92. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Angell HK, Bruni D, Barrett JC, Herbst R, Galon J. The Immunoscore: colon cancer and beyond. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:332–339. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Paz I, Argoetti A, Cohen N, Even N, Mandel-Gutfreund Y. RBPmap: a tool for mapping and predicting the binding sites of RNA-binding proteins considering the Motif environment. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2404:53–65. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1851-6_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lv Y, Zhang W, Zhao J, Sun B, Qi Y, Ji H, Chen C, Zhang J, Sheng J, Wang T, et al. SRSF1 inhibits autophagy through regulating Bcl-x splicing and interacting with PIK3C3 in lung cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:108. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00495-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhou X, Wang R, Li X, Yu L, Hua D, Sun C, Shi C, Luo W, Rao C, Jiang Z, et al. Splicing factor SRSF1 promotes gliomagenesis via oncogenic splice-switching of MYO1B. J Clin Invest. 2019;129:676–693. doi: 10.1172/JCI120279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yang X, Coulombe-Huntington J, Kang S, Sheynkman GM, Hao T, Richardson A, Sun S, Yang F, Shen YA, Murray RR, et al. Widespread expansion of protein interaction capabilities by alternative splicing. Cell. 2016;164:805–817. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sveen A, Kilpinen S, Ruusulehto A, Lothe RA, Skotheim RI. Aberrant RNA splicing in cancer; expression changes and driver mutations of splicing factor genes. Oncogene. 2016;35:2413–2427. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Huang KK, Huang J, Wu JKL, Lee M, Tay ST, Kumar V, Ramnarayanan K, Padmanabhan N, Xu C, Tan ALK, et al. Long-read transcriptome sequencing reveals abundant promoter diversity in distinct molecular subtypes of gastric cancer. Genome Biol. 2021;22:44. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02261-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Oka M, Xu L, Suzuki T, Yoshikawa T, Sakamoto H, Uemura H, Yoshizawa AC, Suzuki Y, Nakatsura T, Ishihama Y, et al. Aberrant splicing isoforms detected by full-length transcriptome sequencing as transcripts of potential neoantigens in non-small cell lung cancer. Genome Biol. 2021;22:9. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02240-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Xiong Y, Deng Y, Wang K, Zhou H, Zheng X, Si L, Fu Z. Profiles of alternative splicing in colorectal cancer and their clinical significance: A study based on large-scale sequencing data. EBioMedicine. 2018;36:183–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jackson HW, Defamie V, Waterhouse P, Khokha R. TIMPs: versatile extracellular regulators in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:38–53. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The ONT and Illumina sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequencing Read Archive database (SRA, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) under the accession number SRP303779 (https://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/?view=study&acc=SRP303779) and SRP303082 (https://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/?view=study&acc=SRP303082), respectively.