Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 Sep 11;17(9):e0011614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011614

Prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths and associated risk factors among primary school children in Kandahar, Afghanistan: A cross-sectional analytical study

Bilal Ahmad Rahimi 1,2,*, Najeebullah Rafiqi 3, Zarghoon Tareen 1, Khalil Ahmad Kakar 4, Mohammad Hashim Wafa 5, Muhammad Haroon Stanikzai 6, Mohammad Asim Beg 7, Abdul Khaliq Dost 3, Walter R Taylor 8
Editor: Peter Steinmann9
PMCID: PMC10513306  PMID: 37695763

Abstract

Background

Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections are global health problem, especially in low-income countries. Main objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence and intensity of STH and its risk factors among school children in Kandahar city of Afghanistan.

Methodology/principal findings

This was a school-based cross-sectional analytical study, with data collected during eight-month-period (May–December, 2022) from 6- and 12-years old school children in Kandahar city, Afghanistan. All the stool samples were examined by saline wet mount method and Kato–Katz technique. Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, Chi square test, and multivariate logistic regression.

A total of 1275 children from eight schools of Kandahar city were included in this study. Mean age of these children was 8.3 years with 53.3% boys. The overall prevalence of any intestinal parasitic infection was 68.4%. The overall prevalence of STH infection was 39.1%, with Ascaris lumbricoides (29.4%) as the most prevalent STH species. Mean intensity of overall STH infection was 97.8. Multivariate logistic regression revealed playing barefoot (AOR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.2), not washing hands after defecating and before eating (AOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0–1.7), having untrimmed nails (AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.8), and belonging to poor families (AOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0–1.7) as the risk factors associated with the predisposition of school children for getting STH in Kandahar city of Afghanistan.

Conclusions/significance

There is high prevalence of STH among school children of Kandahar city in Afghanistan. Most of the risk factors are related to poverty, decreased sanitation, and improper hygiene. Improvement of socioeconomic status, sanitation, and health education to promote public awareness about health and hygiene together with periodic mass deworming programs are better strategies for the control of STH infections in Afghanistan.

Author summary

Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) are a group of intestinal parasites which globally infect more than 1.5 billion people, primarily in low- and middle-income countries. Approximately 260 million preschool-age and 654 million school-age children live in areas where the transmission of STH is very high. The risk of parasitic diseases is estimated to be very high in Afghanistan, but studies are rarely done on STH in Afghanistan. So, this study was conducted with main goals to estimate the prevalence and intensity of STH and its associated factors among primary school children in Kandahar city of Afghanistan. This study found that prevalence of STH is high among school children. Most of the factors associated with increased STH infections in Kandahar city school children are related to poverty, decreased sanitation, and improper hygiene. Improvement of socioeconomic status, sanitation, and health education to promote public awareness about health and hygiene together with periodic mass deworming programs are better strategies for the control of STH infections in Afghanistan.

Introduction

Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) belong to a group of neglected tropical diseases, which occur primarily in low- and middle-income countries across tropical and subtropical regions, and disproportionately affect low-income communities [1]. Globally, World Health Organization (WHO) estimates more than 1.5 billion (24% of the world population) people are infected with STHs in Africa, Asia, and Latin America [13]. Over 260 million preschool-age and 654 million school-age children live in areas where STH transmission is very high [1].

Globally, the most prevalent STH is Ascaris lumbricoides (A. lumbricoides) (infecting approximately 1.2 billion people), followed by Trichuris trichiura (T. trichiura) (infecting nearly 795 million people) and hookworm (Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus) which infects approximately 740 million people [4,5]. School age children are at high risk of being infected with STH. This could be due to the reason that these children are more exposed to contaminated soil when they play, walk barefoot, eat soil, and do not practice good personal hygiene [6]. Individuals with moderate-to-heavy intensity STH infections experience adverse health outcomes including diarrhea, abdominal pain, anemia, and impaired cognitive and physical development in children [5,711]. Deworming campaigns in different countries of the world have shown to improve nutritional status, cognition, and school performance in school-age children [1214].

Afghanistan, for the last four decades, has been suffering from military and civil conflict. This, combined with natural disasters, has extremely weakened economic development [15]. The prevalence of STH is mostly unknown in Afghanistan. Diagnosis is mostly made on clinical basis without any laboratory confirmation. The advent of Taliban government, decrease in international humanitarian aid, insecurity, and shortage of medical staff at all levels of the healthcare system hinders the implementation of epidemiological surveillance [16]. Healthcare system in Afghanistan is mostly dependent of international humanitarian aid [17]. The risk of parasitic diseases is estimated to be very high in Afghanistan [18].

Unfortunately, to our knowledge, only two studies have been conducted in Afghanistan to find the prevalence of STH among primary school children [19,20]. In 2003, World Health Organization (WHO) conducted a school-based survey with the help of Afghan ministry of public health and Afghan ministry of education. They collected fecal samples from 1,001 school children in four provinces of Afghanistan (Kabul, Kandahar, Nangarhar, and Farah) for soil-transmitted helminths (STH) [19]. In 2017, a follow-up survey was conducted among school children aged 8–10 years to provide an update on STH epidemiology in Kabul, Balkh, Herat, Nangarhar, and Kandahar provinces of Afghanistan [20]. In 2020, a community-based study among 1426 children was conducted to estimate the prevalence and associated factors of STH among children in Daman district of Kandahar province in Afghanistan. In this study, the overall prevalence of STH infection was 22.7%. Main risk factors associated with the predisposition of rural children for getting STH were not washing hands after defecating/before eating, living in mud house, walking barefoot, living in overcrowded house, and practicing open defecation [21]. In another hospital-based study in Afghanistan, 548 fecal samples were collected from the patients (both children and adults) with internal complaints who were admitted in two hospitals of Ghazni and Parwan provinces. More than one-third of these patients had intestinal helminths [16]. Main objectives of this school-based study were to estimate the prevalence and intensity of STH and its risk factors among school children in Kandahar city of Afghanistan.

Methods

Ethics statement

Written informed consents were taken from parents or guardians of all the participants prior to the study. Also, assent forms were given to the children for the participation. Information of the participants will not be disclosed. Ethical approval was taken from Kandahar University Ethics Committee (code number KDRU-EC-2022.19). For data collection, only children’s initials were used. Prior to entering into the computer for analysis, the collected data was coded and de-identified. Also, to minimize the errors, data was double entered.

Study design and study area

This was a school-based cross-sectional analytical study, conducted during eight-month-period (May–December, 2022) in Kandahar. Kandahar is a city, located in the south-west of Afghanistan. This city is located at an elevation of 1,010 meters. Kandahar is Afghanistan’s second largest city after Kabul, with a population of about 614,118 people. All the schools of Kandahar city were selected for randomization using lottery method. After randomization, eight schools (four boys’ schools and four girls’ schools) were selected for the study. The four boys’ school were Ahmad Shah Baba school, Mirwais Neka school, Zahir Shahi school, and Temor Shahi school. The four girls’ schools were Zarghona Ana school, Malalai school, Nazo Ana school, and Aino Ana school.

Study population and sample size calculation

Our source population was comprised of primary school children (both boys and girls) of class one to class five, with ages between 6 and 12 years. All those children were excluded from the study who received any anti-helminthic treatment in the previous three months before the commencement of the study, having chronic diseases, not able to provide stool samples, or their parents/guardians refused to participate in the study. If more than one children are coming from the same household, the statistics can be over represented in the household with many primary school age children. To avoid this issue, only one child per house was enrolled in this study.

The sample size and power calculations were performed in Epi Info version 7.2 (CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA). A 20% non-response rate was added. Our sample size was 1385 children. Among these children, parents/guardians of 32 (2.3%) children refused to take part in the study, 70 (5.1%) failed to submit their fecal samples, six (0.4%) had history of receiving anti-helminthic treatment in the last three months, while two (0.1%) had history of chronic disease (thalassemia). So, data was collected from 1275 children.

The total population of Kandahar city is 614,118 with primary school age population of 121,000 children. During 2022, there were a total of 17,950 (14.8% of primary school age population) primary school children with 11844 (66%) boys and 6,106 (34.0%) girls [22]. So, our sample size constitutes 7.1% of school population while 1.1% of all primary school-age children of Kandahar city.

Sample collection and laboratory procedures

From all schools, children were selected using lottery method of randomization. A questionnaire was utilized in two local languages (Pashto and Dari) with questions regarding general characteristics, economic status, general sanitation and environmental conditions, and laboratory examination. Data were collected/recorded on paper forms by experienced and trained investigators. Prior to data collection, short briefings were given, during which the objectives and methods of the study were clearly informed to the children. The case record form and other materials were pretested before the actual data collection. Persons responsible for data collection were well trained on how to conduct the interview with children and their parents or care-takers and how to collect the stool samples. For stool sample collection, the children who agreed to participate in the study were provided with clean pre-labeled capped plastic container for stool collection along with instruction on correct placement of the stool into the containers. All the children were instructed to collect 100 mg of the stool samples. In the laboratory, saline wet mount method and Kato–Katz technique were used by expert laboratory technicians. Saline wet mount method was used for protozoa identification while Kato-Katz technique was used to detect and find the intensity of intestinal helminths. Kato-Katz thick smears were examined within one hour of its preparation to avoid over clearing of Hookworm eggs. The total number of eggs were expressed as eggs per gram (EPG) of stool. EPG was calculated to classify the infection intensity as light, moderate, and heavy infection. The severity of STHs infection is defined as light, moderate, and heavy intensity of infections, respectively, as follows A. lumbricoides: 1 to 4999 EPG, 5000 to 49999 EPG, and ≥50000 EPG; T. trichiura: 1 to 999 EPG, 1000 to 9999 EPG, and ≥10000 EPG; hookworm: 1 to 1999 EPG, 2000 to 3999 EPG, and ≥4000 EPG [23]. For quality control, 10% of the stool samples were randomly selected and examined by another experienced laboratory technician who was blinded for the previous test result.

Data analysis

The data were entered into Microsoft Excel, cleaned, and imported to Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 (Chicago, IL, USA) for statistical analysis. Descriptive analysis including frequency, mean, standard deviation (SD), and range was used to summarize demographic characteristics. Frequency and percentage were used to summarize categorical variables. Chi-square test (using crude odds ratio [COR]) was performed to assess the binary association between various categorical variables. All variables that were statistically significant in univariate analyses were assessed for independence in a multivariate logistic regression (using adjusted odds ratio [AOR]) to determine the factors associated with the predisposition of rural children for getting STH. A P-value of <0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic, economic characteristics, and hygiene conditions

Among 1385 children, data was collected from 1275 children. So, our response rate was 92.1%. Among 679 (53.3%) boys, 190 (14.9%) were from Temor Shahi school, 176 (13.8%) from Mirwais Neka school, 161 (12.6%) from Ahmad Shah Baba school, and 152 (11.9%) from Zahir Shahi school. From 596 (46.7%) girls, 152 (11.9%) were from Malalai school, 150 (11.8) from Nazo Ana school, 148 (11.6%) from Aino Ana school, and 146 (11.5%) from Zarghona Ana school. Mean (SD) age of these children was 8.3 (1.8) years with 903/1275 (70.8%) belonging to poor families (daily income <2 USD per day) (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic and other characteristics of the study participasnts.

Variable Total, n (%) (n = 1275) Boys, n (%) (n = 679) Girls, n (%) (n = 596) P-value
STH present in stool
 Yes 499 (39.1) 270 (39.8) 229 (38.4) 0.624
 No 776 (60.9) 409 (60.2) 367 (61.6)
Family daily income per person (in Afghanis)
 ≥180 (≥2 USD) 372 (29.2) 210 (30.9) 162 (27.2) 0.142
 <180 (<2 USD) 903 (70.8) 469 (69.1) 434 (72.8)
Family size
 <5 people 297 (23.3) 151 (22.2) 146 (24.5) 0.341
 ≥5 people 978 (76.7) 528 (77.8) 450 (75.5)
Mother’s education
 Literate 149 (11.7) 82 (12.1) 67 (11.2) 0.643
 Illiterate 1126 (88.3) 597 (87.9) 529 (88.8)
Father’s education
 Literate 300 (23.5) 137 (20.2) 163 (27.3) 0.003
 Illiterate 975 (76.5) 542 (79.8) 433 (72.7)
House construction
 Concrete 313 (24.5) 198 (29.2) 115 (19.3) <0.001
 Mud 962 (75.5) 481 (70.8) 481 (80.7)
Source of drinking water
 Safe 1010 (79.2) 509 (75.0) 501 (84.1) <0.001
 Unsafe 265 (20.8) 170 (25.0) 95 (15.9)
Toilet in school
 Absent or not functional 565 (44.3) 179 (26.4) 386 (64.8) <0.001
 Present and functional 710 (55.7) 500 (73.6) 210 (35.2)
Washing hands after defecating/before eating
 Yes 419 (32.9) 233 (34.3) 186 (31.2) 0.239
 No 856 (67.1) 446 (65.7) 410 (68.8)
Walking barefoot
 Yes 180 (14.1) 99 (14.6) 81 (13.6) 0.613
 No 1095 (85.9) 580 (85.4) 515 (86.4)
Finger nail status
 Untrimmed 866 (67.9) 467 (68.8) 399 (66.9) 0.485
 Trimmed 409 (32.1) 212 (31.2) 197 (33.1)
Habit of nail biting
 Yes 115 (9.0) 60 (8.8) 55 (9.2) 0.808
 No 1160 (91.0) 619 (91.2) 541 (90.8)
Consumption of raw vegetables
 Yes 776 (60.9) 266 (39.2) 510 (85.6) <0.001
 No 499 (39.1) 413 (60.8) 86 (14.4)
Habit of eating soil
 Yes 70 (5.5) 50 (7.4) 20 (3.4) 0.002
 No 1205 (94.5) 629 (92.6) 576 (96.6)
Domestic animals present at home
 Yes 315 (24.7) 219 (32.3) 96 (16.1) <0.001
 No 960 (75.3) 460 (67.7) 500 (83.9)

N, Number; STH, Soil-transmitted helminth; USD, United States Dollar.

Prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths

The overall prevalence of STH infection was 39.1% (499/1275 children). A. lumbricoides (29.4%, 375/1275) was the most prevalent STH species, followed by T. trichiura (12.1%, 154/1275) and hookworm (8.7%, 111/1275). Prevalence of intestinal protozoa infection was 31.7% (404/1275) while prevalence of overall any intestinal parasitic infection was 68.4% (872/1275). G. intestinalis (Giardia intestinalis) was the most prevalent intestinal protozoa with a prevalence of 22.4%. Among the STH infected patients, single infection, double infection, and triple infections were present in 343/1275 (26.9%), 151/1275 (11.8%), and 5/1275 (0.4%) of the children, respectively. Among other intestinal parasites, Hymenolepis nana was the most prevalent (221/1275 [17.3%]) (Table 2 and Fig 1).

Table 2. Species of intestinal parasitic infection among primary school children in Kandahar city.

Intestinal parasitic infection Number (n = 1275) Prevalence (%)
Overall any intestinal parasitic infection 872 68.4
 Monoparasitism 474 37.2
 Polyparasitism 398 31.2
Overall any STH infection 499 39.1
 Single STH infection 343 26.9
 Double STH infection 151 11.8
 Triple STH infection 5 0.4
Overall any intestinal protozoa infection 404 31.7
STH
Ascaris lumbricoides 375 29.4
Trichuris trichiura 154 12.1
 Hookworm spp. 111 8.7
Protozoa
Giardia intestinalis 286 22.4
 Entamoeba spp. 189 14.8
Other intestinal parasites
Hymenolepis nana 221 17.3
 Taenia spp. 124 9.7
Enterobius vermicularis 50 3.9

n, Number; STH, Soil-transmitted helminth.

Fig 1. Prevalence of intestinal parasites among school children in Kandahar city.

Fig 1

The intensity of soil-transmitted helminths

The intensity of STHs infection was categorized based on the WHO classification thresholds using Kato-Katz thick smear method of parasites egg quantification expressed in eggs per gram (EPG) of stool. Mean intensity of overall STH infection was 97.8. The mean intensity of A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and hookworm spp. infection in our study was 105.4, 92.8, and 95.5, respectively. Light intensity of A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and hookworm spp. was present in 90.4% (339/375), 97.4% (150/154), and 95.5% (106/111) of the school children, respectively. Heavy intensity of STH was not observed in any of the children (Table 3).

Table 3. Infection intensity of STHs among primary school children in Kandahar city.

Frequency, n (%) EPG, mean (range)
Overall STH infection n = 499 97.8 (2–13150)
Ascaris lumbricoides
 Overall n = 375 105.4 (5–13150)
 Light intensity 339 (90.4) 103.6 (5–4370)
 Moderate intensity 36 (9.6) 6380 (5600–13150)
 Heavy intensity 0 0
Trichuris trichiura
 Overall n = 154 92.8 (3–1650)
 Light intensity 150 (97.4) 90.3 (3–780)
 Moderate intensity 4 (2.6) 1375 (1200–1650)
 Heavy intensity 0 0
Hookworm spp.
 Overall n = 111 95.5 (2–2800)
 Light intensity 106 (95.5) 92.4 (2–1680)
 Moderate intensity 5 (4.5) 2250 (2180–2800)
 Heavy intensity 0 0

EPG, Eggs per gram; spp, Species.

Risk factors of soil-transmitted helminths

In Chi-square test, statistically significant variables responsible for increased STH infection were children playing barefoot (COR 1.7, 95% CI [confidence interval] 1.2–2.3, and p-value 0.001), not washing hands after defecation and before eating (COR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–1.9, and p-value 0.002), having untrimmed finger nails (COR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2–1.9, and p-value 0.001), habit of nail biting (COR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0–2.2, and p-value 0.045), and belonging to poor families (COR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.8, and p-value 0.009) (Table 4).

Table 4. Univariate analyses and logistic regression of risk factors associated with increased STH in primary school children.

Variable Total, n (%) (n = 1275) STH infection present COR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI) P-value
Yes, n (%) (n = 499) No, n (%) (n = 776)
Gender
 Male 679 (53.3) 270 (39.8) 409 (60.2) 0.9 (0.8–1.2) 0.624
 Female 596 (46.7) 229 (38.4) 367 (61.6) 1
Mother’s education
 Literate 149 (11.7) 62 (41.6) 87 (58.4) 1 0.510
 Illiterate 1126 (88.3) 437 (38.8) 689 (61.2) 1.1 (0.8–1.6)
Father’s education
 Literate 300 (23.5) 122 (40.7) 178 (59.3) 1 0.535
 Illiterate 975 (76.5) 377 (38.7) 598 (61.3) 1.1 (0.8–1.4)
Playing barefoot 1.6 (1.1–2.2)
 Yes (risky) 180 (14.1) 90 (50.0) 90 (50.0) 1.7 (1.2–2.3) 0.001 0.006
 No 1095 (85.9) 409 (37.4) 686 (62.6) 1
House construction
 Concrete 313 (24.5) 113 (36.1) 200 (63.9) 1 0.205
 Mud 962 (75.5) 386 (40.1) 576 (59.9) 0.8 (0.6–1.1)
Source of drinking water
 Safe 1010 (79.2) 391 (38.7) 619 (61.3) 1 0.544
 Unsafe 265 (20.8) 108 (40.8) 157 (59.2) 0.9 (0.7–1.2)
Family daily income per person (in Afghanis)
 ≥180 (≥2 USD) 372 (29.2) 125 (33.6) 247 (66.4) 1 0.009 1 0.038
 <180 (<2 USD) 903 (70.8) 374 (41.4) 529 (58.6) 1.4 (1.1–1.8) 1.3 (1.0–1.7)
Family size
 <5 people 297 (23.3) 119 (40.1) 178 (59.9) 1 0.708
 ≥5 people 978 (76.7) 380 (38.9) 598 (61.1) 1.1 (0.8–1.4)
Washing hands after defecating/before eating
 Yes 419 (32.9) 139 (33.2) 280 (66.8) 1 0.002 1 0.043
 No (risky) 856 (67.1) 360 (42.1) 496 (57.9) 1.5 (1.1–1.9) 1.3 (1.0–1.7)
Finger nails status
 Untrimmed (risky) 866 (67.9) 365 (42.1) 501 (57.9) 1.5 (1.2–1.9) 0.001 1.4 (1.1–1.8) 0.010
 Trimmed 409 (32.1) 134 (32.8) 275 (67.2) 1 1
Habit of nail biting
 Yes 115 (9.0) 55 (47.8) 60 (52.2) 1.5 (1.0–2.2) 0.045 1.0 (0.6–1.6) 0.944
 No 1160 (91.0) 444 (38.3) 716 (61.7) 1
Consumption of raw vegetables
 Yes 776 (60.9) 292 (37.6) 484 (62.4) 1 0.169
 No 499 (39.1) 207 (41.5) 292 (58.5) 0.9 (0.7–1.1)
Habit of eating soil
 Yes 70 (5.5) 29 (41.4) 41 (58.6) 1 0.686
 No 1205 (94.5) 470 (39.0) 735 (61.0) 1.1 (0.7–1.8)
Domestic animals present at home
 Yes 315 (24.7) 130 (41.3) 185 (58.7) 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 0.371
 No 960 (75.3) 369 (38.4) 591 (61.6) 1
Toilet in school
 Absent or not functional 565 (44.3) 228 (40.4) 337 (59.6) 1.1 (0.9–1.1) 0.427
 Present and functional 710 (55.7) 271 (38.2) 439 (61.8)

AOR, Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval; COR, Crude Odds Ratio; n, number; STH, Soil-transmitted helminth; USD, United States Dollar.

Multivariate logistic regression of the above-mentioned statistically significant variables revealed that playing barefoot (AOR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.2, and p-value 0.006), not washing hands after defecating and before eating (AOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0–1.7, and p-value 0.043), having untrimmed nails (AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.8, and p-value 0.010), and belonging to poor families (AOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0–1.7, and p-value 0.038) as the risk factors associated with the predisposition of school children for getting STH (Table 4). Hookworm infection and other STHs (ascariasis and trichuriasis) are different in the aspect of life cycle of the parasites. Therefore, we did the analysis for risk factors between these two different infections, but there were no statistically significant difference between them.

Discussion

In this cross-sectional study, we studied 1275 school children during eight-month period (May–December, 2022). The overall prevalence of STH among school children of Kandahar city was 39.1% with mean intensity of 97.8. Main risk factors associated with STH among school children were playing barefoot, not washing hands after defecating and before eating, having untrimmed nails, and belonging to poor families.

In our study, prevalence of STH among school children was 39.1%. This prevalence is more than the studies conducted in Cameroon (1%) [24], Nepal (3.1%) [25], Indonesia (10.1%) [26], China (14.1%) [27], Tajikistan (32%) [28], and Malaysia (37%) [29]. Contrary, prevalence in our study is less than reported in studies from Philippines (84.7%) [30], Ethiopia (84.4%) [31], Nigeria (83.3%) [32], and India (75.6%) [33]. The prevalence variances observed in different parts of the world (and even different areas of the same country) are multifactorial; including differences in stool examination techniques, geographical location, time of study, type of study, age of study participants, culture, socio-economic status, literacy levels/occupations of the parents or guardians, food consumption habits, personal hygiene behaviors, and playing habits and facilities of children in and outside the school [34]. Table 5 compares the prevalence of STH infections in school children among our study and two other studies conducted in Kandahar city in 2003 and 2017. In our study, the prevalence of STH is lower but prevalence of hookworm is higher than other two studies conducted in Kandahar. In 2017 study, no moderate or heavy intensity STH infections were observed. In 2003 study, moderate-severe intensity was observed only in A. lumbricoides infection. Decreased STH prevalence (39.1%) in our study can be contributed to the collection of only one stool sample instead of the standard three samples and Afghanistan ministry of public health (with the help of UN donor agencies) implementation of mass deworming interventions once in a year among school children throughout Afghanistan. Increased prevalence of hookworm in our study could be due to increased contact of school children to soil. In recent years, due to drought and decreased availability of ground water in Kandahar city, grass playgrounds have changed into soil playgrounds in nearly all schools.

Table 5. Prevalence of STH infections among school children in Kandahar city, in 2003, 2017, and 2022.

2003 [19] 2017 [20] 2022 (This study)
Sample size (n) 257 452 1275
Any STH (%) 42.8 46.8 39.1
Ascaris lumbricoides (%) 37.4 45.5 29.4
 Light intensity 91.7 100 90.4
 Moderate intensity 8.3* 0 9.6
 Heavy intensity 0 0
Trichuris trichiura (%) 7.8 1.4 12.1
 Light intensity 100 100 97.4
 Moderate intensity 0 0 2.6
 Heavy intensity 0 0 0
Hookworm spp. (%) 0 0.5 8.7
 Light intensity 0 100 95.5
 Moderate intensity 0 0 4.5
 Heavy intensity 0 0 0

* Moderate-heavy infection

STH, Soil-transmitted helminth.

The most prevalent STH in our study was A. lumbricoides (29.4%). The A. lumbricoides as the most common STH has also been reported in studies from Nepal (26.6%) [35], India (69.6%) [33], and Nigeria (75.6%) [36]. The reason behind the A. lumbricoides predominance could be associated to the long life of the female worm and has a fecundity rate of approximately 134,000–360,000 eggs per day for nearly 300 days. As a result, vast numbers of eggs are discharged into the human environment daily. Furthermore, the hard nature of these eggs to resist adverse environmental conditions more than other STHs can contribute to sustaining the transmission cycle for a longer period [37]. A study was conducted on 207 adults and 179 children visiting health facilities of Ghazni and Parwan provinces of Afghanistan. This study concluded that the most prevalent STH among children was A. lumbricoides (25.1% in Ghazni province and 10.8% in Parwan province) [16]. In 2003, a study conducted among school children of Kabul, Nangarhar, Farah, and Kandahar provinces of Afghanistan revealed that the most prevalent STH was A. lumbricoides with the prevalence of 41% (408/1001) in the school children of these four provinces of Afghanistan [19]. In 2017, another study conducted in Kabul, Balkh, Herat, Nangarhar and Kandahar provinces of Afghanistan showed that the most prevalent STH infection was the one with A. lumbricoides (25.7%) [20]. In 2020, a community-based study in rural children of Daman district in Kandahar Afghanistan also reported A. lumbricoides as the most prevalent STH species (18.7%) [21].

Aside from STH, the most prevalent (22.4%) intestinal parasite in our study was G. intestinalis. Similar results have been reported from another study in Afghanistan (14.5%) [16], Pakistan (28.9%) [38], Tajikistan (26.4%) [28], Kenya (26.1%) [39], and Peru (27.5) [40]. Evidence reveals that not only acute but chronic Giardiasis has an effect on the nutrition and health status of children [41]. Chronic intestinal protozoal infections are increasingly recognized as cause of undernutrition among children and have been proposed to be considered as neglected tropical diseases, causing morbidity in children comparable to infections caused by STHs [42].

Fortunately, severe intensity of STH infection was not observed in any child in this study. However, moderate intensity of A. lumbricoides, hookworm spp., and T. trichiura was present in 9.6%, 4.5%, and 2.6% of our study children, respectively. In study conducted during 2017 in Kandahar, no moderate-heavy intensity STH infections were observed [20]. This increase observed in our study could be contributed to the decrease in socio-economic status of people since the advent of Taliban in August 2021. Our result is higher than the WHO elimination target of STHs, which is defined as a <2% of moderate and heavy intensity due to STH infections [43]. Compared to our study, increased moderate-heavy intensity STH infections have been reported from Myanmar [44], Malaysia [45], Cameroon [46], and Rwanda [47]. Contrary, decreased moderate-heavy intensity STH infections have been reported from India [48], Ethiopia [37], and Nigeria [49].

Our study showed that children who were not washing hand after defecation and before eating were having statistically significant STH. Protective effects of handwashing have also been reported from Iran [50], Uzbekistan [51], China [27], India [52,53], Nepal [25], Lao [54], Indonesia [26], and Ethiopia [55]. In contrast, Wondemann and colleagues in Cuba reported a negative association between hand washing and infections [56]. This could be due to the lack of knowledge about transmission of the parasites or lack of awareness regarding health and hygiene habits among mothers [57].

In this study, living in poor families was a risk factor associated with increased STH infection among school children. Similar results have been reported in other studies [38,58,59]. It could be due to the reason that poor families have very little access to clean water, sanitation, and hygiene.

Our study revealed that walking barefoot is a risk factor for having increased STH infection. Similar results have been reported from Nepal [60], Thailand [61], Indonesia [26], Malawi [62], Ethiopia [63], and Kenya [64]. On the other hand, studies conducted in India did not notice any association between footwear usage and STH [65,66]. Walking barefoot is especially a risk factor for hookworms, as their larvae in the soil can penetrate into unbroken skin. Although walking barefoot is not directly related to infections of other helminths, but it indirectly leads to the infection when child touches the contaminated feet and eat with unwashed hands afterwards [67].

Having untrimmed nails was also a risk factor of increased STH infection in our study. This result is in accordance with researches reported from Ethiopia [6870] and Thailand [71]. This could be due to the outdoor playing habits of school children on poor sanitation areas, which results in contamination of their hands. Dirt under fingernails may harbor different stages of parasites, which can be ingested during food eating and nail-biting or thumb sucking [69,71].

Limitations

There were some limitations in our study. We obtained only one fecal sample instead of the ideal three consecutive samples due to unavailability of fund, the level of cooperation, and response of the caretakers and children. This might underestimate the real burden of STH. Also, this study did not focus on molecular assays and other techniques that are best to estimate the prevalence of STHs and differentiate different species of hookworm. We did not get data of clinical symptoms and underlying diseases of the children, which can be confounding factors for STH. Additional studies should be performed in different parts of the country.

Conclusion

Based on the results of our study, more than one-third of the primary school children were infected with at least one STH species. This indicates that STHs are still a health problem among primary school children in Kandahar. Main risk factors associated with the predisposition of school children for getting STH were playing barefoot, children from poor families, children not washing hand after defecation/before eating, and children with untrimmed finger nails.

We recommend that improvement of socioeconomic status, sanitation, and health education to promote public awareness about health and hygiene. Periodic mass deworming programs are crucial for the control of STH infections in Afghanistan. Besides albendazole, praziquantel or niclosamide should be added to the deworming program, to cover H. nana and Taenia spp. too. Meanwhile, government and international donor agencies in Afghanistan should help in improving socio-economic status of the people through provision of basic facilities such as piped water, electricity, good housing, and proper toilets.

Supporting information

S1 File. Microsoft excel file with some of the data of this study.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We present our highest and sincere thanks to the authorities of Faculty of Medicine, Kandahar University, Kandahar Province Directorate of Education, and parents of the children of the school children in Kandahar City. We are also very thankful of the data collectors and all our study participants. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Availability of data and materials

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files

Funding Statement

WRT is partly is part funded by Wellcome under grant 220211. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Soil-transmitted helminth infections. In: WHO. 2023 [cited 14 May 2023]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/soil-transmitted-helminth-infections
  • 2.Murphy E, Togbevi IC, Ibikounlé M, Avokpaho EFGA, Walson JL, Means AR. Soil-transmitted helminth surveillance in Benin: A mixed-methods analysis of factors influencing non-participation in longitudinal surveillance activities. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17: e0010984. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0010984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Salam N, Azam S. Prevalence and distribution of soil-transmitted helminth infections in India. BMC Public Health. 2017;17: 201. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4113-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis. Coordinated use of anthelminthic drugs in control interventions: a manual for health professionals and programme managers. Geneva: WHO; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Parija S, Chidambaram M, Mandal J. Epidemiology and clinical features of soil-transmitted helminths. Trop Parasitol. 2017;7: 81–85. doi: 10.4103/tp.TP_27_17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hailegebriel T, Nibret E, Munshea A. Prevalence of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infection Among School-Aged Children of Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Infectious Diseases: Research and Treatment. 2020;13: 1–14. doi: 10.1177/1178633720962812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jourdan PM, Lamberton PHL, Fenwick A, Addiss DG. Soil-transmitted helminth infections. Lancet. 2018;391: 252–265. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31930-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Awasthi S, Bundy DAP, Savioli L. Helminthic infections. BMJ; 2003; 327(7412):431–433. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7412.431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Crompton DWT. Ascariasis and childhood malnutrition. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992;86: 577–579. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90133-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crompton DWT, Nesheim MC. Nutritional impact of intestinal helminthiasis during the human life cycle. Annu Rev Nutr. 2002;22:35–59. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.120501.134539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oberhelman RA, Guerrero ES, Fernandez ML, Silio M, Mercado D, Comiskey N, et al. Correlations between intestinal parasitosis, physical growth, and psychomotor development among infants and children from rural Nicaragua. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1998;58: 470–475. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1998.58.470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Girum T, Wasie A. The Effect of Deworming School Children on Anemia Prevalence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Open Nurs J. 2018;12: 155–161. doi: 10.2174/1874434601812010155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Opoku EC, Olsen A, Browne E, Hodgson A, Awoonor-Williams JK, Yelifari L, et al. Impact of combined intermittent preventive treatment of malaria and helminths on anaemia, sustained attention, and recall in Northern Ghanaian schoolchildren. Glob Health Action. 2016;9: 32197. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.32197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mireku MO, Davidson LL, Koura GK, Ouédraogo S, Boivin MJ, Xiong X, et al. Prenatal hemoglobin levels and early cognitive and motor functions of one-year-old children. Pediatrics. 2015;136: e76–e83. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wagner AL, Mubarak MY, Johnson LE, Porth JM, Yousif JE, Boulton ML. Trends of vaccine-preventable diseases in Afghanistan from the Disease Early Warning System, 2009–2015. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0178677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Korzeniewski K, Chung WC, Augustynowicz A, Lass A, Ik KJ. Current status of intestinal parasitic infections among inhabitants of the Ghazni and Parwan Provinces, Afghanistan. Family Medicine and Primary Care Review. 2017;19: 23–28. doi: 10.5114/fmpcr.2017.65087 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Elyan DS, Monestersky JH, Wasfy MO, Noormal B, Oyofo BA. Capacity building of public health laboratories in Afghanistan: challenges and successes (2007–2011). Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2014;20: 112–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wallace MR, Hale BR, Utz GC, Olson PE, Earhart KC, Thornton SA, et al. Endemic infectious diseases of Afghanistan. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2002;34: S171–S207. doi: 10.1086/340704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ramsan M, Gabrielli A-F, Tsogzolmaa D, Bojang B, Naumann C, Khoshal MH, et al. Distribution, prevalence and intensity of Soil-transmitted helminth infections among Afghan schoolchildren, 2003. J Helminthol. 2005;79: 381–384. Available: /pmc/articles/PMC5630093/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Safi N, Warusavithana S, Shah Alawi SA, Atta H, Montresor A, Gabrielli AF. Elimination of morbidity due to soil-transmitted helminthiases among Afghan schoolchildren. Acta Trop. 2019;197: 105035. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.05.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rahimi BA, Mahboobi BA, Wafa MH, Sahrai MS, Stanikzai MH, Taylor WR. Prevalence and associated risk factors of soil-transmitted helminth infections in Kandahar, Afghanistan. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22: 361. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07336-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kandahar Directorate of Education. Yearly Report of Kandahar Province Directorate of Education. In: Afghanistan Ministry of Education. 2021 [cited 10 Aug 2023]. Available: https://moe.gov.af/sites/default/files/2021-02/%DA%AF%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B4%20%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%AA%DB%8C%20%DA%A9%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%B1.pdf
  • 23.WHO Expert Committee on the Control of Schistosomiasis & World Health Organization. Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis: report of a WHO expert committee. In: World Health Organization. 2002 [cited 28 Jan 2023]. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42588 [PubMed]
  • 24.Tabi ESB, Eyong EM, Akum EA, Löve J, Cumber SN. Soil-transmitted Helminth infection in the Tiko Health District, South West Region of Cameroon: a post-intervention survey on prevalence and intensity of infection among primary school children. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;30: 74. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.74.15676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tandukar S, Ansari S, Adhikari N, Shrestha A, Gautam J, Sharma B, et al. Intestinal parasitosis in school children of Lalitpur district of Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6: 449. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arta Suryantari SA. Prevalence, intensity and risk factors of soil transmitted helminths infections among elementary school students in Ngis village, Karangasem district, Bali. Indonesian Journal of Tropical and Infectious Disease. 2019;7: 137. doi: 10.20473/IJTID.V7I6.9952 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Balen J, Raso G, Li YS, Zhao ZY, Yuan LP, Williams GM, et al. Risk factors for helminth infections in a rural and a peri-urban setting of the Dongting Lake area, People’s Republic of China. Int J Parasitol. 2011;41: 1165–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Matthys B, Bobieva M, Karimova G, Mengliboeva Z, Jean-Richard V, Hoimnazarova M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of helminths and intestinal protozoa infections among children from primary schools in western Tajikistan. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4: 1–13. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huat LB, Mitra AK, Jamil NIN, Dam PC, Mohamed HJJ, Muda WAMW. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Intestinal Helminth Infection Among Rural Malay Children. J Glob Infect Dis. 2012;4: 10. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.93753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Papier K, Williams GM, Luceres-Catubig R, Ahmed F, Olveda RM, McManus DP, et al. Childhood Malnutrition and Parasitic Helminth Interactions. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2014;59: 234–243. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yeshanew S, Bekana T, Truneh Z, Tadege M, Abich E, Dessie H. Soil-transmitted helminthiasis and undernutrition among schoolchildren in Mettu town, Southwest Ethiopia. Sci Rep. 2022;12: 3614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07669-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ibidapo CA, Okwa O. The prevalence and intensity of soil transmitted helminths in a rural community, Lagos suburb, South West Nigeria. Int J Agric Biol. 2008;10: 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ganguly S, Barkataki S, Karmakar S, Sanga P, Boopathi K, Kanagasabai K, et al. High prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections among primary school children, Uttar Pradesh, India, 2015. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6: 139. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0354-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Belyhun Y, Medhin G, Amberbir A, Erko B, Hanlon C, Alem A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for soil-transmitted helminth infection in mothers and their infants in Butajira, Ethiopia: A population based study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10: 1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-21/TABLES/4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Khadka KS, Kaphle HP, Gurung K, Shah Y, Sigdel M. Study of Intestinal Parasitosis among School Going Children in Pokhara, Nepal. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences. 2013;3: 47–50. doi: 10.37107/JHAS.54 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Osazuwa Ayo OM, Imade P. A significant association between intestinal helminth infection and anaemia burden in children in rural communities of Edo state, Nigeria. N Am J Med Sci. 2011;3: 30–34. doi: 10.4297/najms.2011.330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Eyayu T, Yimer G, Workineh L, Tiruneh T, Sema M, Legese B, et al. Prevalence, intensity of infection and associated risk factors of soil-transmitted helminth infections among school children at Tachgayint woreda, Northcentral Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2022;17: e0266333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mehraj V, Hatcher J, Akhtar S, Rafique G, Beg MA. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Intestinal Parasitic Infection among Children in an Urban Slum of Karachi. PLoS One. 2008;3: e3680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Obala AA, Simiyu CJ, Odhiambo DO, Nanyu V, Chege P, Downing R, et al. Webuye Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems Baseline Survey of Soil-Transmitted Helminths and Intestinal Protozoa among Children up to Five Years. J Trop Med. 2013;2013: 734562. doi: 10.1155/2013/734562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cabada M, Goodrich M, Graham B, Villanueva-Meyer P, Deichsel E, Lopez M, et al. Prevalence of intestinal helminths, anemia, and malnutrition in Paucartambo, Peru. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015;37: 69–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gutiérrez EJ, Pineda V, Calzada JE, Guerrant RL, Neto JBL, Pinkerton RC, et al. Enteric parasites and enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in children from Cañazas County, Veraguas Province, Panama. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91: 267–272. doi: 10.4269/AJTMH.13-0438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bartelt LA, Lima AAM, Kosek M, Peñataro Yori P, Lee G, Guerrant RL. “Barriers" to Child Development and Human Potential: The Case for Including the “Neglected Enteric Protozoa" (NEP) and Other Enteropathy-Associated Pathogens in the NTDs. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.World Health Organization. Ending the neglect to attain the Sustainable Development Goals: A road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030. In: WHO. 2021 [cited 13 Aug 2023]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240010352
  • 44.Aung E, Han KT, Gordon CA, Hlaing NN, Aye MM, Htun MW, et al. High prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections in Myanmar schoolchildren. Infect Dis Poverty. 2022;11: 28. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-00952-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Muslim A, Sofian SM, Shaari SA, Hoh BP, Lim YAL. Prevalence, intensity and associated risk factors of soil transmitted helminth infections: A comparison between Negritos (indigenous) in inland jungle and those in resettlement at town peripheries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13: e0007331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ruth MMR, Cedric Y, Malla ME, Nadia NAC, Aime TN, Leonelle M, et al. Intestinal Helminth Infections and Associated Risk Factors among School-Aged Children of Bamendjou Community, West Region of Cameroon. J Parasitol Res. 2021;2021. doi: 10.1155/2021/6665586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kabatende J, Barry A, Mugisha M, Ntirenganya L, Bergman U, Bienvenu E, et al. Efficacy of Single-Dose Albendazole for the Treatment of Soil-Transmitted Helminthic Infections among School Children in Rwanda—A Prospective Cohort Study. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16: 139. doi: 10.3390/ph16020139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ganguly S, Barkataki S, Sanga P, Boopathi K, Kanagasabai K, Devika S, et al. Epidemiology of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections among Primary School Children in the States of Chhattisgarh, Telangana, and Tripura, India, 2015–2016. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022;107: 122–129. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Griswold E, Eigege A, Adelamo S, Mancha B, Kenrick N, Sambo Y, et al. Impact of Three to Five Rounds of Mass Drug Administration on Schistosomiasis and Soil-Transmitted Helminths in School-Aged Children in North-Central Nigeria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022;107: 132–142. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Daryani A, Sharif M, Nasrolahei M, Khalilian A, Mohammadi A, Barzegar G. Epidemiological survey of the prevalence of intestinal parasites among schoolchildren in Sari, northern Iran. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2012;106: 455–459. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2012.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gungoren B, Latipov R, Regallet G, Musabaev E. Effect of hygiene promotion on the risk of reinfection rate of intestinal parasites in children in rural Uzbekistan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101: 564–569. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kaliappan SP, George S, Francis MR, Kattula D, Sarkar R, Minz S, et al. Prevalence and clustering of soil-transmitted helminth infections in a tribal area in southern India. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2013;18: 1452–1462. doi: 10.1111/TMI.12205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Awasthi S, Verma T, Kotecha P, Venkatesh V, Joshi V, Roy S. Prevalence and risk factors associated with worm infestation in pre-school children (6–23 months) in selected blocks of Uttar Pradesh and Jharkhand, India. Indian J Med Sci. 2008;62: 484–491. doi: 10.4103/0019-5359.48552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hohmann H, Panzer S, Phimpachan C, Southivong C, Schelp F. Relationship of intestinal parasites to the environment and to behavioral factors in children in the Bolikhamxay Province of Lao PDR. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2001;32: 4–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Nasr NA, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Ahmed A, Roslan MA, Bulgiba A. Towards an effective control programme of soil-transmitted helminth infections among Orang Asli in rural Malaysia. Part 1: Prevalence and associated key factors. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6: 1–12. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wördemann M, Polman K, Menocal Heredia LT, Junco Diaz R, Collado Madurga AM, Núñez Fernández FA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of intestinal parasites in Cuban children. Tropical medicine & international health. 2006;11: 1813–1820. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01745.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Messaad SA, Laboudi M, Moumni M, Sarhane B, Belghyti D, Kharrim KE. Children Intestinal parasites related to socio-economic factors in Salé Hospital, Morocco. Int J Innov Appl Stud. 2014;8: 833–840. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Quihui L, Valencia ME, Crompton DWT, Phillips S, Hagan P, Morales G, et al. Role of the employment status and education of mothers in the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in Mexican rural schoolchildren. BMC Public Health. 2006;6: 225. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nematian J, Nematian E, Gholamrezanezhad A, Asgari AA. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and their relation with socio-economic factors and hygienic habits in Tehran primary school students. Acta Trop. 2004;92: 179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Parajuli RP, Umezaki M, Watanabe C. Behavioral and nutritional factors and geohelminth infection among two ethnic groups in the Terai region, Nepal. American Journal of Human Biology. 2009;21: 98–104. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jiraanankul V, Aphijirawat W, Mungthin M, Khositnithikul R, Rangsin R, Traub RJ, et al. Incidence and risk factors of hookworm infection in a rural community of central Thailand. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2011;84: 594–598. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Phiri K, Whitty CJ, Graham S, Ssembatya-Lule G. Urban/rural differences in prevalence and risk factors for intestinal helminth infection in southern Malawi. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2000;94: 381–387. doi: 10.1080/00034983.2000.11813553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Erosie L, Merid Y, Ashiko A, Ayine M, Balihu A, Muzeyin S, et al. Prevalence of Hookworm infection and haemoglobin status among rural elementary school children in Southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development. 2002;16: 113–115. doi: 10.4314/EJHD.V16I1.9833 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Freeman MC, Chard AN, Nikolay B, Garn J V., Okoyo C, Kihara J, et al. Associations between school- and household-level water, sanitation and hygiene conditions and soil-transmitted helminth infection among Kenyan school children. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8: 412. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1024-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kattula D, Sarkar R, Ajjampur S, Minz S, Levecke B, Muliyil J, et al. Prevalence & risk factors for soil transmitted helminth infection among school children in south India. Indian J Med Res. 2014;139: 76–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Puhalenthi K, Chandrababu C, Maniprabhu S, Vijayakumar K, Thomas M, Mini S. Prevalence of Geohelminthic Infection and Its Risk Factors Among School Children in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Cureus. 2023;15: e34116. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Anunobi JT, Okoye IC, Aguzie IO, Ndukwe YE, Okpasuo OJ. Risk of soil-transmitted helminthiasis among agrarian communities of Kogi state, Nigeria. Ann Glob Health. 2019;85: 120, 1–13. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ibrahim T, Zemene E, Asres Y, Seyoum D, Tiruneh A, Gedefaw L, et al. Epidemiology of soil-transmitted helminths and Schistosoma mansoni: a base-line survey among school children, Ejaji, Ethiopia. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2018;12: 1134–1141. doi: 10.3855/jidc.9665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Eyamo T, Girma M, Alemayehu T, Bedewi Z. Soil-Transmitted Helminths and Other Intestinal Parasites Among Schoolchildren in Southern Ethiopia. Res Rep Trop Med. 2019;10: 137–143. doi: 10.2147/RRTM.S210200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Samuel F, Demsew A, Alem Y, Hailesilassie Y. Soil transmitted Helminthiasis and associated risk factors among elementary school children in Ambo town, western Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2017;17: 1–7. doi: 10.1186/S12889-017-4809-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Laoraksawong P, Suntaraluk A, Kongnil W, Pongpanitanont P, Janwan P. Prevalence of Soil–Transmitted Helminth Infections and Associated Risk Factors among Schoolchildren in Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand. Iran J Parasitol. 2020;15: 440–445. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v15i3.4210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011614.r001

Decision Letter 0

Peter Steinmann, Francesca Tamarozzi

2 Aug 2023

Dear Prof. Dr Rahimi,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths and associated risk factors among primary school children in Kandahar, Afghanistan: A cross- sectional analytical study." for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Peter Steinmann, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Francesca Tamarozzi

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: LAB TECHNIQUES

It is not clear what lab technique was applied to detect which parasite.

Was the saline wet mount method used for protozoa and the Kato-Katz for helminths?

SCHOOL ENROLMENT

Please clarify the primary school enrolment rate (%) in Kandahar, and comment on whether children included in the study can be considered as representative the school-age population of the city

Reviewer #2: Yes, but some information is missing. Please refer to general comments section.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Please clarify what % of the entire schoolchildren population of Kandahar (or what % of schools) were included in the survey (to understand how representative the sample was).

Reviewer #2: Yes, but some needs to be revised. Please refer to general comments section.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: These comments cover both sections "Discussion" and "Conclusions"

(1) Please add comments on intensity of STH infections and its implications on morbidity.

(2) Please add information on intensity of STH infections to Table 5 and draw a comparison: it looks like that in 2017 no moderate-intensity infections were found but in your survey you do find some moderate-intensity infections.

(3) Please add details on the current status of STH deworming activities carried out in Afghanistan in general and in Kandahar more specifically.

(4) Although the title of the paper implies that its focus is on STH, data on intestinal protozoa and on other helminths were nevertheless collected and presented. It would be useful to include these in the discussion and draw a comparison with information taken from previously-implemented surveys

(5) The "Discussion" section contains some repetition of information already presented in the "Introduction" - please streamline as necessary

Reviewer #2: Yes

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: Please refer to above comments

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: A descriptive study contributing to the body of evidence on STH in Afghanistan. Some limitations:

(1) The survey is focused on a single province, Kandahar.

(2) It looks like there is some overlapping with a paper published by the same first author in 2022 (with very similar title), although this was focused on a single district; in light of this, sentences such as "The risk factors of STH among school children are unknown in Afghanistan" (Background) do not seem to be appropriate.

(3) Discussion on STH should focus more on intensity of infection (see comments above)

Reviewer #2: The authors demonstrated the prevalence of STH and associated risk factors among PSAC in Afghanistan. Although there is limitation in analyzing one sample per individual, it can provide evidence for high prevalence and associated risk factors that need interventions. This article has strength in including large number of PSACs and investing risk factors in the same individuals, but more detailed descriptions and analysis are needed.

These are some inquiry and suggestions.

1. Authors stated that children who received any anti-helminthic treatment in the previous three months were excluded, but the number excluded by this criteria was not described. On page 9, only those whose parents refused or who failed to submit their fecal samples were described. And it is hard to know previous treatment history or presence of chronic disease before the investigation. Please describe how it was investigated and how many were excluded by this criteria. If the previous treatment was based on the stool exam or symptom based, this could be another reason why this study shows lower prevalence resulting from selection bias.

2. (Table 1) The percentage next to the should be described the other way, describing proportions within the boys or girls. The current way of description is affected by the total number of boys and girls included, and cannot be used to describe differences in proportions between boys and girls.

3. Hookworm infection and other STHs (ascariasis and trichuriasis) are different in the aspect of life cycle of the parasites. If there was difference in the result of risk factor analysis between these two different infections, please describe it. Even if not, please state it in the manuscript. For instance, it would be interesting to see if barefoot is also associated with ascariasis or trichuriasis in this study.

4. It seems this study include a number of families with more than 5 people. Can authors identify household information? If many of the individuals are coming from the same household, the statistics can be over represented in the household with many PSACs. Please indicate if authors have household information, and if there are substantial number, it would be beneficial to provide analysis with household data.

Minor inquiry and suggestions.

1. Typical KK methods include a number of eggs found in a slide multiplied by 24. How many slides were made in one sample, and how authors could get 2,3, or 5 as EPGs?

2. It seems that children were questioned, not guardians were according to the description in methods. Please indicate if the guardians were questioned.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Hyun Beom Song

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011614.r003

Decision Letter 1

Peter Steinmann, Francesca Tamarozzi

21 Aug 2023

Dear Prof. Dr Rahimi,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths and associated risk factors among primary school children in Kandahar, Afghanistan: A cross- sectional analytical study.' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Peter Steinmann, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Francesca Tamarozzi

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011614.r004

Acceptance letter

Peter Steinmann, Francesca Tamarozzi

7 Sep 2023

Dear Prof. Dr Rahimi,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths and associated risk factors among primary school children in Kandahar, Afghanistan: A cross- sectional analytical study.," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Microsoft excel file with some of the data of this study.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to Reviewer Comments.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES