Abstract
Traumatic brain injury leads to cellular and circuit changes in the dentate gyrus, a gateway to hippocampal information processing. Intrinsic granule cell firing properties and strong feedback inhibition in the dentate are proposed as critical to its ability to generate unique representation of similar inputs by a process known as pattern separation. Here we evaluate the impact of brain injury on cellular decorrelation of temporally patterned inputs in slices and behavioral discrimination of spatial locations in vivo one week after concussive lateral fluid percussion injury (FPI) in mice. Despite posttraumatic increases in perforant path evoked excitatory drive to granule cells and enhanced ΔFosB labeling, indicating sustained increase in excitability, the reliability of granule cell spiking was not compromised after FPI. Although granule cells continued to effectively decorrelate output spike trains recorded in response to similar temporally patterned input sets after FPI, their ability to decorrelate highly similar input patterns was reduced. In parallel, encoding of similar spatial locations in a novel object location task that involves the dentate inhibitory circuits was impaired one week after FPI. Injury induced changes in pattern separation were accompanied by loss of somatostatin expressing inhibitory neurons in the hilus. Together, these data suggest that the early posttraumatic changes in the dentate circuit undermine dentate circuit decorrelation of temporal input patterns as well as behavioral discrimination of similar spatial locations, both of which could contribute to deficits in episodic memory.
Keywords: granule cell, dentate gyrus, electrophysiology, traumatic brain injury, memory, behavior, fluid percussion injury, temporal pattern separation
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a growing epidemic (Vaishnavi et al., 2009; Rusnak, 2013) with an annual global incidence of over 60 million patients (McAllister, 1992) who are at risk for a variety of neuropsychological sequelae (Rao and Lyketsos, 2000). While neurological complications of TBI increase with injury severity (Annegers and Coan, 2000), even mild to moderate concussive brain injuries can lead to early and long term deficits in memory function (Kumar et al., 2013; Arciniega et al., 2021; Alosco et al., 2023). The dentate gyrus, a critical node in memory processing, receives extensive inputs from the entorhinal cortex and develops discrete sparse representations for downstream processing in hippocampal circuits (Leutgeb et al., 2007; Neunuebel and Knierim, 2014). The dentate gyrus is also the focus of neuronal loss and circuit reorganization early after human and experimental concussive brain injury (Lowenstein et al., 1992; Santhakumar et al., 2000; Meier et al., 2016; Leh et al., 2017; Neuberger et al., 2017b; Folweiler et al., 2020), suggesting that dentate dependent memory functions are likely compromised after brain injury.
In particular, the dentate gyrus has been shown to be essential for distinguishing between similar memory episodes by encoding partially overlapping memories into discrete neuronal representations (Gilbert et al., 2001; McHugh et al., 2007; Yassa and Stark, 2011; Cayco-Gajic and Silver, 2019). At the circuit level, this is proposed to be achieved by pattern separation, a process of minimizing interference by segregating similar input patterns into discrete neuronal activity patterns. Whereas behaviorally relevant inputs and the resulting neuronal input patterns occur in space and time (Hainmueller and Bartos, 2020), their neuronal representations have been evaluated mostly in the spatial domain as changes in firing or activity rates in spatially discrete neuronal groups or ensembles (Leutgeb et al., 2007; Larimer and Strowbridge, 2010; GoodSmith et al., 2017). However, whether brain injury impairs the ability of the dentate circuit to faithfully represent inputs and disambiguate similar neuronal input patterns remains unknown.
Most behavioral studies have focused on discrimination of spatial and contextual patterns to evaluate mechanisms of dentate pattern separation and assess the impact of disease (McHugh et al., 2007; Morris et al., 2012; Bekinschtein et al., 2013; Kahn et al., 2019). Studies in the fluid percussion injury (FPI) model of concussive brain injury have revealed early deficits in sequential spatial navigation in a dentate-dependent radial arm maze task, indicating that concussive brain injury compromises the ability to process and recall subtle spatial differences (Correll et al., 2021). Similarly, brain injury is also known to compromise working memory function (Smith et al., 2015; Korgaonkar et al., 2020a). Still, whether episodic processing of spatial novelty by behavioral discrimination of spatial location is altered after brain injury remains to be determined.
In an approach complementary to behavioral studies, computational analyses of mechanisms for disambiguating overlapping memories have adopted spatially and temporally patterned inputs to assess “pattern separation”. In this approach, model networks are activated by inputs with various degrees of similarity in spike timing and/or activated cell ensembles and the ability of the network to generate distinct spatio-temporal firing patterns is used as a measure of pattern separation (Rolls and Kesner, 2006; Myers and Scharfman, 2011; Madar et al., 2019b; Braganza et al., 2020). These studies have shown that dentate granule cells (GCs) decorrelate input patterns both in terms of the active ensembles recruited as well as the pattern of firing in the active neurons (Myers and Scharfman, 2009, 2011; Yim et al., 2015). However, few experimental studies have evaluated the ability of the dentate circuit to decorrelate spatially and temporally patterned inputs (Larimer and Strowbridge, 2010; Madar et al., 2019a). Recently, Madar et al. (2019a) adopted an experimental paradigm in hippocampal slices to demonstrate that GCs could undertake input decorrelation at the level of individual neurons. These studies identified a role for inhibition in supporting temporal pattern separation in GCs and revealed cell-type specific and disease related changes in input decorrelation by dentate neurons (Madar et al., 2019a; Madar et al., 2021). These findings are consistent with predictions of simulations (Braganza et al., 2020) and with behavioral deficits in discrimination of novel spatial location in mice during suppression of dentate somatostatin interneuron activity in vivo (Morales et al., 2021). Since experimental concussive brain injury has been shown to result in early loss of dentate inhibitory neuron subtypes (Lowenstein et al., 1992; Toth et al., 1997; Santhakumar et al., 2001; Folweiler et al., 2020), we examined whether the resulting changes in inhibition (Folweiler et al., 2020; Gupta et al., 2020; Gupta et al., 2022) could alter dentate dependent pattern separation in the temporal and spatial domains one week after brain injury. Because the relationship between neuronal spike train timing and behavioral spatial information is currently unclear, we will denote GC pattern separation of temporally patterned inputs in slice as “decorrelation” and behavioral spatial pattern separation in vivo as “spatial discrimination”.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All experiments were performed in accordance with IACUC protocols approved by the University of California, Riverside, CA in keeping with the ARRIVE guidelines.
Fluid Percussion Injury:
Randomly selected 8 to 10-week-old littermate male and female C57BL6/J mice were subjected to lateral fluid percussion injury (FPI) or sham injury. Briefly, mice were placed in a stereotaxic frame under isoflurane anesthesia and administered the local anesthetic 0.25% bupivacaine (subcutaneous). A 2.7 mm hole was trephined on the left side of the skull 2 mm caudal to bregma and 1 mm lateral from the sagittal suture. A Luer-Lok syringe hub with a 3 mm inner diameter was placed over the exposed dura and bonded to the skull with cyanoacrylate adhesive. The animals were returned to their home cage following recovery. One day later, animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and attached to a fluid percussion injury device (Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, Model 01-B) directly at the metal nozzle. A pendulum was dropped to deliver a brief (20 ms) 1.5–1.7 atm impact on the intact dura. For sham injury, the animals underwent surgical implantation of the hub and were anesthetized and attached to the FPI device, but the pendulum was not dropped (Smith et al., 2012; Gupta et al., 2022).
Slice Preparation:
Naive C57BL6/J mice and mice one week after FPI or sham injury were anesthetized with isoflurane and decapitated for slice preparation using established protocols (Korgaonkar et al., 2020b; Afrasiabi et al., 2021). Horizontal brain slices (300 μm) were prepared in ice-cold sucrose artificial CSF (sucrose-aCSF) containing the following (in mM): 85 NaCl, 75 sucrose, 24 NaHCO3, 25 glucose, 4 MgCl2, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, and 0.5 CaCl2 using a Leica VT1200S Vibratome (Wetzlar, Germany). Slices were incubated at 34°C for 30 min in an interface holding chamber containing an equal volume of sucrose-aCSF and recording aCSF, and subsequently were held at room temperature. The recording aCSF contained the following (in mM): 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, and 10 D-glucose. All solutions were saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 and maintained at a pH of 7.4 for 1– 6 h. Only sections on the side of injury were used in experiments.
Physiological Recordings
Voltage clamp recordings of perforant path evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (eEPSCs) were obtained from dentate GCs using recording electrodes (3 – 6 MΩ) containing a Cs-Methanesulfonate Internal (in mM): 140 Cs-Methane sulfonate, 5 NaCl, 10 HEPES, 0.2 EGTA, 4 Mg-ATP, 0.2 Na-GTP, 5 Qx-314 with 0.2% biocytin. GCs were held at −70 mV, close to reversal potential for GABA, to isolate EPSCs (Andreasen and Hablitz, 1994). Evoked EPSCs were recorded in response to 0.1 to 2.0 mA stimuli, applied in 100 pA steps, through a concentric stimulus electrode positioned at the perforant path on the other side of the fissure from the dentate molecular layer. Peak amplitude of eEPSC was measured from the average of 3 to 5 responses at each step using ClampFit 10. A subset of recordings were obtained in a saturating concentration of gabazine (10 μM) to block both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptors.
Current clamp recordings to assess GC pattern separation were obtained using filamented borosilicate glass electrodes (3 – 6 MΩ) containing (in mM): 126 K-gluconate, 4 KCl, 10 HEPES, 4 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP, 10 PO-creatinine with 0.2% biocytin. To assess cell health, GCs were held at −70 mV and responses to 1500 ms current steps from −200 pA to threshold positive current injection in 40 pA steps were recorded. Cells with resting membrane potential positive to −55 mV were excluded from analysis.
Pattern Separation Paradigm and Analysis
To assess GC pattern separation, input trains of varying correlations were adopted from Madar et al. (2019a). Each input correlation set included 5 temporally distinct trains at 10 Hz with an overall mean Pearson’s correlation coefficient (Rin) of 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, or 0.95, designated henceforth as R25, R50, R75 and R95. The individual input trains (#1-#5) within an input correlation set were each 2 seconds long and were delivered at 2 second intervals. The 5 distinct input trains were delivered in sequence and the set was repeated 10 times for a total of 50 recorded trains (Madar et al., 2019a; Madar et al., 2021). Note that the average frequency of each input train was maintained at 10 Hz while in each set of 5 trains the timing of stimuli was varied to generate trains with different correlations.
GCs were held at −70 mV in whole cell configuration and stimuli were delivered through a concentric stimulating electrode (10 μm tip diameter) placed in the outer molecular layer to activate perforant path fibers. Stimulus trains were delivered with intensity ranging from 0.1–2 mA at 0.5 Hz so as to elicit action potentials in response to approximately 50% of stimuli. Once stimulus intensity was set, it was maintained constant for all input sets recorded. Cell resting membrane potential and access resistance were assessed between input sets and recordings were terminated if access resistance increased over 20% or membrane depolarized beyond −55 mV. To assess the role of inhibition in temporal pattern separation, GCs were recorded and stimulated with input correlations of R75 in aCSF and then perfused with a sub-saturating concentration of gabazine (SR95531, 100nM), a GABAA receptor antagonist as described in earlier studies (Madar et al., 2019b), and to avoid burst firing (not shown) that occurred in pilot studies using saturating gabazine (10 μM).
For quantification of GC pattern separation function, Pearson’s R correlation was calculated on output spike train rasters as previously defined in Madar et al. (2019a) using custom MATLAB code modified from: https://github.com/antoinemadar/PatSepSpikeTrains. Unless indicated otherwise, data were binned at 10 ms. For validation of pattern separation paradigm in naïve mice, pairwise correlation of each GC spike output train (Rout) was plotted against the predetermined correlation in the corresponding pairwise input spike trains. The five distinct input spike trains and their corresponding output spike trains are compared in a pairwise manner to assess correlation. Thus, the five input patterns yield 10 distinct Rin values centered around the target Rin and correspondingly, 10 Rout values. These Rin-Rout sets were used to compare data between GCs from sham and FPI mice.
To assess the reliability of GC input-output coupling between experimental groups, we evaluated spike train reliability (Rw) as a measure of the cell’s ability to faithfully respond to multiple presentations of the same input train (effectively Rin=1). Rw was calculated as the average correlation of output of a given GC in response to 10 presentations of the same input pattern in the R95 input set and then averaged across the 5 patterns.
Novel Object Location Task and Analysis
To assess behavioral pattern separation, we implemented a novel object location task to test spatial discrimination (Bekinschtein et al., 2013; Morales et al., 2021) in mice one week post FPI or sham injury. The task consisted of a circular arena 50 cm in diameter and 47 cm high with laboratory tape in varying patterns in four distinct locations on the white opaque arena walls serving as spatial visual cues. The experimenter room was separated from the testing room with the test arena by a closed door. The testing room was dimly lit with overhead lights using dimmer switch on lowest setting. Mice underwent four days of habituation for 10 minutes each followed by a sample and choice phase on day five. The testing arena and objects were cleaned with 70% ethanol in between each animal throughout the entire experiment. During habituation, mice were brought to the testing room from the vivarium, handled by the experimenter, and exposed to the testing arena for 10 min each day where they were allowed to explore freely. On test day, mice were first exposed to a sample phase for 10 min, with three identical objects placed 120 degrees and approximately 16 cm apart and allowed to freely explore the objects. Mice were then returned to their home cage for 30 min before the choice phase. During the choice phase, one object was placed in its original (familiar) location, one object was removed, and the last object was shifted by 60° to a novel (unfamiliar) location. The mice were placed into the arena and allowed to explore the objects for five minutes. Videos were manually coded and analyzed by an experimenter blinded to animal injury status. Object exploration was counted as the number of times the animal’s nose was within 0.5 cm of the object, with each continuous second counted as an additional exploration. Discrimination ratio was calculated as [Exploration of Object in Unfamiliar Location – Exploration of Object in Familiar Location] / [Total Exploration]. Total exploration was also compared between groups.
Immunohistochemistry:
Immunohistochemistry for ΔFosB, somatostatin (SST), and parvalbumin (PV) was used to evaluate persistent neuronal activity (You et al., 2017) and interneuron loss. Immediately following the novel object location task, mice were perfused transcardially with ice cold PBS followed by 4% PFA. Brains were excised and incubated in 4% PFA overnight and transferred to 30% sucrose for 2–3 days or until tissue sank. Brains were then flash frozen in OCT using liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C prior to cryosectioning. 20 μm serial sections were collected and mounted on SuperFrost slides and stored at −80°C prior to staining. Slides were stained for ΔFosB, SST, or PV following standard procedures (Neuberger et al., 2017a; Korgaonkar et al., 2020b). Briefly, slides were allowed to thaw to room temperature (RT) for 10 min, washed with 1xPBS 3×5min to wash off residual OCT. Slides were blocked in 10% normal goat serum in PBS + 0.3% Triton-X for one hour at RT, then incubated in anti- ΔFosB, SST, or PV antibody (1:500, Cell Signaling D3S8R; SST: 1:100, Millipore MA5–16987; PV: 1:1000, Swant GP72) overnight at 4°C. Slides were then washed 3×10 min with PBS and then incubated in goat anti-rabbit AF594 secondary antibody (1:1000, Invitrogen A11012) for ΔFosB, goat anti-rat AF647 antibody (1:1000, Invitrogen A-21247) for SST goat anti-guinea pig AF647 antibody (1:1000, Invitrogen, A-21450) for PV for 1.5 hours at RT, washed 3×10 min with PBS, and coverslipped using VectaShield with DAPI mounting media. Slides were imaged using Zeiss Axioscope Epifluorescence Microscope as single optical sections at 10x and 20x for analysis. Blinded analysis was performed using Cell Detection settings in QuPath 0.4.2 (https://qupath.github.io) with files coded without injury status. Briefly, for ΔFosB and SST analysis, a ROI was drawn to outline the granule cell layer (GCL) using DAPI labeling to detect ΔFosB positive cells and in the hilus to detect SST neurons. Detection parameters were kept consistent between sections, and 3 to 6 level matched sections were averaged in each mouse for analysis, depending on slice and image quality. Robust and sparse PV immunolabeled neuronal somata were counted manually on QuPath for full dentate region to include both hilar, GCL, and molecular layer PV interneurons. SST cell counts were normalized to total hilar area (in mm2). The hilar area averaged across sections was not different between sections from sham and FPI mice (area in mm2, sham: 1.11±0.06 in 8 mice, FPI: 1.20±0.09 in 6 mice, p=0.38 by Student’s t-test).
Statistical Analysis:
Statistical analyses were conducted in GraphPad Prism 9. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test for normality, and appropriate parametric or non-parametric statistical analyses were conducted. F-test to compare variances was used to assess whether both sample groups undergoing statistical comparisons have equal standard deviations. All statistical comparisons were conducted at an alpha level of α = 0.05. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA (TW-RM ANOVA), paired and unpaired Student’s or Welch’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test were used where appropriate.
RESULTS
Dentate gyrus excitability is increased one week after concussive brain injury in mice.
Previous studies have identified an early increase in dentate network excitability after concussive brain injury in rat (Santhakumar et al., 2001; Neuberger et al., 2017a; Korgaonkar et al., 2020b) and mice (Witgen et al., 2005; Smith et al., 2012; Folweiler et al., 2018; Folweiler et al., 2020). To determine if afferent input drive to GCs is enhanced after FPI in mice, we recorded granule cell current responses to stimulation of the perforant path fibers using an electrode placed outside the fissure in mice one week after FPI or sham injury. As illustrated by the IR-DIC images (Fig. 1A) and the lack of change in average cross-sectional area of the hilus (see methods), the moderate FPI used in this study did not result in gross anatomical distortions of the dentate gyrus. Recordings were obtained from a holding potential of −70 mV to isolate glutamatergic currents in the absence of synaptic blockers. As reported following FPI in rat (Korgaonkar et al., 2020b), perforant path-evoked excitatory post-synaptic current (eEPSC) amplitudes in response to increasing current injection, was significantly enhanced in mice one week after FPI compared to sham injured controls (Figure 1B–C, n = 14 cells from 5 sham mice and 8 cells from 4 FPI mice, F(1, 176)=31.25, p<0.0001 for effect of injury by TW-RM ANOVA). In light of the extensive changes in dentate inhibition after FPI (Gupta et al., 2012; Gupta et al., 2022), we isolated eEPSCs in the presence of saturating concentration of the ionotropic GABAAR antagonist gabazine (10μM). Granule cell eEPSC amplitude recorded in gabazine was also increased after FPI (Figure 1D–E, n = 11 cells/4 sham mice and 10 cells/4 FPI mice, F(1, 19)=15.49, p<0.0009 for effect of treatment by TW-RM ANOVA). Note that the prolonged eEPSC depolarization is consistent with polysynaptic activation previously reported after FPI in rat (Santhakumar et al., 2000). Analysis of the resting membrane potential (in mV, sham: −65.63±2.95 in 12 cells, FPI: −64.7±1.92 in 10 cell, p=0.9 by t-test) and access resistance (in MΩ, sham: 14.1±1.4 in 12 cells, FPI: 15.3±1.5 in 10 cell, p=0.56 by t-test) failed to reveal systematic differences between groups. To assess whether FPI results in sustained increase in excitability one week after injury, we examined dentate sections for expression of ΔFosB, a uniquely stable activity-dependent immediate early gene product shown to be persistently enhanced in epilepsy (You et al., 2017). Immunohistochemical staining of sections from a cohort of sham and FPI mice sacrificed one week after FPI identified an increase in the number of ΔFosB expressing putative GCs in the granule cell layer compared to that in sham mice (Fig 1 F–G, number of ΔFosB + GCs: sham: 24.11±5.98, n = 8 mice FPI: 52.51±15.25, n = 7 mice, p=0.02 by Mann-Whitney U test), which is consistent with sustained enhancement of dentate excitability. There was an increase in variance in the number of ΔFosB expressing GCs after brain injury (F6,7 = 5.6, p=0.04) indicative of individual differences in dentate hyperexcitability. Together, these data establish that the mouse model of moderate FPI used in our study results in both an increase in excitatory drive to GCs and an overall sustained increase in dentate excitability one week after injury.
Inhibition is critical for granule cell decorrelation of temporal spike train patterns.
The characteristic low GC excitability and robust inhibition are critical for maintaining sparse GC firing and pattern separation. To determine if temporal input decorrelation by GCs is impacted by FPI, we implemented an ex-vivo temporal pattern separation paradigm (Madar et al., 2019a; Madar et al., 2021) to assess the ability of GCs, within the local dentate microcircuit, to disambiguate temporally patterned inputs. GC firing was recorded in response to stimulation of perforant path fibers in the outer molecular layer, using sets of stimulus patterns with known degrees of similarity, to quantify similarity between output spikes. For initial validation, four sets of Poisson input stimulus patterns with 10 Hz average frequency and input correlations of R25, R50, R75, or R95 were used to elicit GC responses (Fig 2A). Similarity indices of the GC “output” spike trains (Rout) were computed as the pairwise Pearson’s correlation coefficient on output spike train data binned at 10, 20 and 100 ms to assess the effect of bin-width on Rout (Fig 2B). Consistent with Madar et al. (2019a), GC output similarity was consistently lower than the corresponding pairwise input similarity (Fig 2B, Rin vs. Rout, n =4 cells / 3 mice). Since the reduction in output similarity was most robust when spike data were binned over 10 ms (Fig. 2B), a bin width of 10 ms was adopted in subsequent experiments. We then examined the potential contribution of the local inhibitory circuit to GC temporal pattern separation by partially decreasing GABAergic inhibition. To compare similarity indices before and after partial inhibitory block within the same cell, we restricted the inputs to a set of 5 stimuli with R75, reflecting a 75% similarity of across the inputs. GC responses were recorded first in aCSF and then in a non-saturating concentration of gabazine (100 nM). Under both recording conditions, GC output correlation remained consistently lower than the input correlation of 0.75 suggesting contributions from cell intrinsic and/or afferent synaptic characteristics in mediating GC temporal pattern separation. However, pairwise comparison of Rout within the same cell and pattern in aCSF versus gabazine revealed a significant increase in GC output correlation (Fig.2 C–E, Mean pairwise Rout, aCSF: 0.20±0.02, Gabazine: 0.30±0.01, n = 4 cells /3 mice; p < 0.0001 by Paired t-test, Cohen’s D =1.7). These results validate the role for inhibition in the ability of GCs to decorrelate temporally patterned inputs as reported previously (Madar et al., 2019a).
Reliability of dentate granule cell spiking is not altered early after FPI.
After validating the experimental brain injury model in mouse (Fig. 1) and establishing the temporal pattern separation paradigm in slice recordings (Fig. 2), we examined GCs in mice one week after sham or FPI for their ability to decorrelate input spike train sets with 25% and 95% similarity. To ensure that there were no systematic differences in GC recordings between sham and FPI, we confirmed that the access resistance was not different between recordings from the two experimental groups (in MΩ, sham: 13.98±1.38, FPI: 15.57±1.97, p=0.54 by Student’s t-test). Additionally, examination of the GC intrinsic parameters failed to reveal differences in resting membrane potential (Fig. 3A–C, in mV, sham: −72.18±1.14, FPI: −75.86±2.06, p=0.16 by Student’s t-test) and input resistance (in MΩ, sham: 102.3±8.61, FPI: 121.1±13.34, p=0.28 by Student’s t-test, based on 11 cells/3 sham mice and 14 cells/4 FPI mice. In GCs that reached threshold with a +160 pA current injection, firing frequency was unchanged after FPI (in Hz, sham: 6.67±2.46 in 7 cells, FPI: 6.74±1.54 in 9 cells, p=0.98 by unpaired Student’s t-test). Similarly, action potential threshold measured at rheobase current injection was not different between groups (Fig. 3B, C, in mV, sham: −31.49±2.13, FPI: −32.15±1.78, p=0.81 by unpaired Student’s t-test). Given the neuronal loss and circuit alterations after FPI (Bonislawski et al., 2007; Neuberger et al., 2017a; Folweiler et al., 2020; Gupta et al., 2020), we examined whether the fidelity of GC response to a given input train is fundamentally altered by injury. Under optimal conditions, if a local dentate network receives identical inputs, a given GC within the receiving network should maintain indistinguishable output responses. To determine if injury alters the ability of the GC network to reliably respond to a given input train, we calculated spike train reliability (Rw) as the average Rout of a given GC in response to identical input pattern using the R95 input set (Fig 4A, B). Note that because stimulus intensity was set to achieve a 50% spike success in each cell, the enhanced eEPSC (Fig. 1) should not impact evaluation of spike train reliability. Indeed, the average firing rate elicited by the input spike trains was not different between GCs from sham and FPI (Fig. 4C, average firing frequency in Hz, sham: 3.55±0.38, FPI: 2.99±0.19, p=0.17 by unpaired Student’s t-test). Interestingly, the variance of the firing frequency trended towards a reduction after FPI (F10,13= 3.10, p = 0.06, F-test for variance) suggesting a potential decrease in a source of input decorrelation after FPI. Despite the dentate circuit changes and enhanced ΔFosB labeling in GCs after FPI, spike train reliability was not different between the GCs from sham and FPI mice (Fig. 4C, average spike train reliability: sham: 0.47±0.05, FPI: 0.51±0.03, p=0.44 by unpaired Student’s t-test; variance (F10,13= 1.92, p = 0.27 by F-test for variance).
Granule cell decorrelation of temporal patterned inputs is reduced after FPI.
To compare temporal pattern separation between GCs from sham and FPI mice, GCs were stimulated using input stimulus train sets with 25% and 95% similarity (Fig. 5A–B). Plots of averaged pairwise Rout values against Rin, for each input set showed that the GCs from both sham and FPI mice were still able to decorrelate inputs (Rout < Rin) (Fig. 5C). Note that the input trains each average Rin generate 10 distinct pairwise Rin values, reflecting correlation between 2 input trains, with corresponding 10 pairwise Rout values for each cell (Supplementary Fig 1C, D). Comparison of the Rout values obtained in response to the 20 Rin values (10 each at R25 and R95) in GCs from sham and FPI mice revealed a significant effect of injury (F(1,18) = 6.57, p<0.02 by TW-RM ANOVA, based on 9 Sham cell from 3 mice and 11 FPI cells from 4 mice each where all input trains were recorded). However, the Rout within each cell averaged across the 10 Rin values at R25 (Sham: 0.13±0.01 in 9 cells/3 mice, FPI: 0.12±0.01 in 11 cells/4 mice, p=0.36) and R95 (Sham: 0.47±0.04 in 11 cells/3 mice, FPI: 0.49±0.01 in 14 cells/4 mice, p=0.49) showed no apparent difference (Supplementary Fig 1A, 1B, note that a few cells in which only R95 stimulus trains were recorded were included in this analysis). We reasoned that this was because averaging across multiple Rin values fails to capture the differences between Rin values and corresponding Rout (Supplementary Fig 1C, D). We generated cumulative probability distributions of the Rout data corresponding to each average Rin value to better assess changes in decorrelation. The cumulative probability distribution of all Rout values for Rin values centered around R25 was not different between GCs from sham and FPI (Fig. 5D, p=0.8 by K-S test). However, the distribution of all Rout values in response to inputs centered around R95 was significantly different between groups (Fig. 5E, p=0.0005 by K-S test) with a preferential reduction in the ability of GCs to support greater decorrelation after FPI. These findings are consistent with a subtle reduction in the ability of the dentate circuit to decorrelate highly similar inputs after injury. These data show that although GCs are continuing to disambiguate similar spike train inputs early after injury, their critical ability to do so when inputs are highly similar is compromised after injury.
Behavioral spatial pattern separation is degraded early after FPI.
To determine whether the reduction in the ability of the dentate circuit to decorrelate input patterns after injury was accompanied by deficits in behavioral spatial discrimination, we adopted a novel object location task, which relies on dentate function and tests for episodic rather than sequential memory (Morales et al., 2021). Mice one week after FPI or sham surgery were assessed in the novel object location task following appropriate habituation (Fig. 6A). The mice were exposed to three identical objects in the sample phase followed, 30 minutes later, by a choice phase in which one object was removed and one of the remaining objects was moved to a novel location (Fig. 6A–B). Compared to sham mice, which showed significantly greater interaction with the object in the novel location (p=0.0002 by one sample t-test), FPI mice failed to show preference for the object in the novel location (p=0.67 by one sample t-test). Consistently, the discrimination ratio, defined as the difference between number of interactions with the object in the novel location and the familiar location divided by the total interaction with both objects, was lower in FPI mice (Fig. 6C, discrimination ratio: sham: 0.28±0.04, FPI: 0.04±0.08, n = 8 mice/group, p=0.02 by unpaired Student’s t-test). However, the total exploration assessed as the number of contacts with objects in the 5-minute exploration period was not different between groups (Fig. 6D, number of contacts: sham: 39.25±5.58, FPI: 41.13±6.6, n = 8 mice each, p=0.83 by unpaired Student’s t-test) indicating no difference in exploration between sham and FPI mice.
Finally, because, previous studies have identified a role for dentate somatostatin interneurons in performance of the novel object location task (Morales et al., 2021) and somatostatin neurons are vulnerable to brain injury (Lowenstein et al., 1992; Santhakumar et al., 2000; Frankowski et al., 2019), we examined whether there was a loss of somatostatin neurons in the FPI mice that performed the behavioral task. Staining for somatostatin revealed a significant reduction of labeled neurons in the dentate hilus one week after FPI (Fig 6E–F, cells/mm2, sham: 11.50±0.92, FPI: 7.337±0.66, based on within animal averages of level matched sections from 8 sham and 6 FPI mice, p=0.005 by unpaired Student’s t-test). In contrast immunostaining for PV failed to reveal changes in PV neuron density after FPI (Fig 6E–F, cells/section, sham: 4.52±0.86, FPI: 5.22±0.70, based on within animal averages of level matched sections from 8 sham and 8 FPI mice, p>0.05 by unpaired Student’s t-test). These data suggest that injury-induced selective loss of dentate somatostatin interneurons could contribute to the observed impairment in location discrimination in mice early after brain injury.
Discussion:
Changes in episodic memory are a major neurocognitive consequence of traumatic brain injury with early and persistent deficits observed in patients and in animal models (Hamm et al., 1996; McHugh et al., 2006; Tsirka et al., 2010; Kumar et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2015; Korgaonkar et al., 2020a; Alosco et al., 2023). Although the dentate gyrus is known to play an essential role in encoding and disambiguating spatial memories, the underlying circuit mechanisms are not fully understood (Rolls and Kesner, 2006; Morris et al., 2012; Kesner, 2013; Cayco-Gajic and Silver, 2019). Here we implemented parallel circuit and behavioral assays of pattern separation in mice one week after concussive brain injury. Interestingly, we find that the reliability of GC firing is not altered after brain injury. Moreover, the GC output correlation was consistently lower than input spike train correlation in cells from both control and injured mice, indicating that temporal pattern separation at the cellular level continued to occur after brain injury. However, the critical ability of dentate GCs to decorrelate highly similar input patterns was reduced after brain injury. These results are analogous to the effect of partial GABAA receptor antagonism where GC output correlation is higher than in aCSF, yet, remains lower than input correlation indicating deficits in decorrelation of inputs by GCs (Fig. 2 and Madar et al., 2019a). Despite the limited decrease in GC cellular temporal pattern decorrelation after injury, behavioral discrimination of spatial location in an episodic memory test was severely compromised. It is possible that the posttraumatic increase in the number of GCs showing sustained increase in excitability, identified by ΔFosB labeling, degrades sparse coding in the dentate and contributes to decline in spatial location discrimination. Furthermore, we demonstrate a decrease in dentate hilar somatostatin neurons in brain injured mice that showed deficits in spatial discrimination. Since somatostatin neurons have been shown to contribute to the novel object location task (Morales et al., 2021) used in our study, posttraumatic somatostatin neuron loss could contribute to deficits in behavioral spatial discrimination. Together these findings identify early changes in dentate inhibition and an increase in GC activity that could compromise the ability of the dentate to effectively decorrelate spike trains and engage distinct GC ensembles, likely contributing to deficits in encoding episodic memories.
Posttraumatic changes in dentate circuit impact temporal decorrelation of input patterns.
There is considerable evidence for the dentate gyrus playing a critical role in distinguishing context and spatial locations (Leutgeb et al., 2007; McHugh et al., 2007; Kesner, 2013; Senzai and Buzsaki, 2017). Because events occur in space and time, patterned neuronal firing can be essential for encoding spatial and temporal information (Kobayashi and Poo, 2004; Buzsaki, 2010; Tort et al., 2011; Eichenbaum, 2013). Experimental and computational studies examining dentate gyrus processing of temporally patterned inputs have identified that individual GCs can effectively orthogonalize temporal patterns in input spike trains. The ability of GCs to decorrelate temporal patterns likely depends on a combination of their intrinsic properties, local circuit inhibition, probabilistic synaptic release and spike-timing history resulting from short-term synaptic dynamics (Yim et al., 2015; Madar et al., 2019b, a). By adopting a temporal pattern separation paradigm, we confirmed that GCs effectively decorrelate input patterns, particularly those with high similarity (Fig. 2). Additionally, we show that even low dose gabazine (100 nM), resulting in partial block of inhibition, contributed to input decorrelation (Fig. 2) demonstrating a role for inhibition in decorrelation of input patterns. It is possible that, in addition to inhibition, perforant path synaptic dynamics and GC intrinsic physiology also contribute to temporal pattern separation in GCs.
In mice one week after concussive brain injury, we demonstrated an increase in perforant path evoked excitatory drive (Fig 1) which is consistent with our prior studies identifying an immune receptor mediated increase in AMPA currents one week after FPI in rat (Li et al., 2015; Korgaonkar et al., 2020b). These results and the lack of changes in GC intrinsic physiology (Fig. 3) and loss of hilar somatostatin neurons early after FPI are consistent with earlier studies in rats (Lowenstein et al., 1992; Santhakumar et al., 2000; Korgaonkar et al., 2020b). Moreover, labeling for ΔFosB, which indicates sustained increases in excitability (You et al., 2017), is increased one week after FPI. Therefore, it may seem surprising that the reliability and average firing frequency of GC responses to temporally patterned inputs remains unchanged after brain injury (Fig 4). Indeed, spike train reliability, a measure of the output correlation in response to identical inputs, is consistently lower than unity due to contributions from network noise and probabilistic transmitter release. A possible reason for maintenance of GC reliability despite the posttraumatic increase in afferent drive (Fig. 1) could be because, in the absence of post-injury changes in GC intrinsic physiology, setting the input stimulus intensity to elicit response in 50% of trials limited the effect of the increased excitatory input. Additionally, despite the loss of interneuron populations (Santhakumar et al., 2000; Folweiler et al., 2020), dentate inhibitory circuits undergo reorganization including increase in granule cell tonic GABA currents (Gupta et al., 2012; Gupta et al., 2022) which could help maintain GC activity levels. Moreover, GCs continue to effectively decorrelate input spike patterns as demonstrated by the consistent observation that output correlation remains lower than the input correlation even after brain injury (Fig 5C). Our finding that GCs continue to decorrelate input patterns early after brain injury is also consistent with recent findings in computational and experimental models of temporal lobe epilepsy (Yim et al., 2015; Madar et al., 2021). However, our results reveal a significant decrease in temporal pattern separation in response to input trains with high degrees of similarity, which suggests that the network level changes including a partial loss of hilar somatostatin neurons do impact decorrelation of input information. Because suppressing dentate inhibition with saturating concentrations of gabazine leads to burst firing in GCs (not shown), complete disinhibition is unlikely to yield meaningful analysis of decorrelation. Future studies adopting opto- or chemogenetic suppression of specific neuronal subtypes could provide additional insights into the contribution of specific interneuron subtypes to GC input decorrelation. Although injury did not decrease GC spike reliability, the variance in firing frequency in response to identical input trains trended to decrease after injury. It is interesting to speculate that the mechanisms contributing to reduced variance in GC firing after injury could also reduce GC decorrelation of highly similar inputs.
Distinguishing between cellular decorrelation of spike timing and behavioral discrimination of temporally ordered memories.
It must be noted that the temporal pattern separation paradigm used in this study focused on timing of spike trains and does not directly correspond to the encoding of temporal sequences of events. Indeed, it is unclear whether the dentate gyrus is involved in distinguishing the temporal order of sequential events occurring over a span of minutes to days (Gilbert et al., 2001). However, the dentate gyrus, and particularly the ongoing generation of adult-born neurons in the dentate, has been shown to play a role in stratification of memories over the time course of weeks (Clelland et al., 2009; Aimone et al., 2011; Nakashiba et al., 2012; Rangel et al., 2014; Miller and Sahay, 2019). Interestingly, adult neurogenesis is altered after brain injury with early increase at one week followed by a progressive decline at one month (Yu et al., 2008; Kernie and Parent, 2010; Shapiro, 2016; Neuberger et al., 2017a; Ngwenya and Danzer, 2018; Clark et al., 2020). Whether injury induced changes in neurogenesis alter stratification or timestamping of contemporary memories and/or compromise spatial and contextual pattern separation at later time points after injury remains to be examined. In this study we focused on the early time point, one week after injury, when the injury-induced neurons are believed to be immature and unlikely to contribute to local dentate feedback inhibition (Overstreet-Wadiche and Westbrook, 2006; Temprana et al., 2015; Miller and Sahay, 2019). Additionally, we recorded GCs in the middle and outer third of the granule cell layer so as to avoid immature adult-born neurons, typically located in the inner third of the granule cell layer (Save et al., 2018; Kerloch et al., 2019). Crucially, all GCs included in analysis had input resistance less than 300 MΩ consistent with mature GC phenotype. Thus, our results identify that, at the level of individual putative mature dentate GCs, spike reliability and ability to decorrelate spike train patterns persist despite the early circuit changes after brain injury. Still, considering that temporal correlations between dentate neurons at the sub-second time scale are important for spatial memory discrimination (van Dijk and Fenton, 2018), our slice physiology data suggest that the dentate’s ability to encode input timing is largely retained early after brain injury. Because the dentate gyrus is particularly important for disambiguating highly similar patterns, the posttraumatic reduction in GC ability to decorrelate highly similar inputs could contribute to deficits in pattern separation after brain injury.
Mechanisms underlying altered behavioral pattern separation after brain injury.
In contrast to GC temporal pattern separation, we find that the ability to encode and discriminate subtle differences in spatial location is profoundly compromised one week after brain injury (Fig. 5). Our results complement a previous study which showed that mice one week after mild to moderate concussive brain injury are impaired in a sequential location discrimination task using the radial arms maze (Correll et al., 2021). Unlike the radial arm maze, the novel object location adopted in our study examines episodic memory and does not rely on repetition of discrete trial procedures (Bekinschtein et al., 2013; Morales et al., 2021). At the medium difficulty level (60° relocation) adopted in our study, the task has been shown to rely on dentate processing and is compromised by selective suppression of dentate somatostatin neurons. Consistently, we find that the behavioral deficit in novel object location one week after brain injury is accompanied by selective loss of hilar somatostatin neurons suggesting that interneuron loss may drive deficits in spatial pattern separation. Our data showing lack of change in PV neurons one week after FPI, when quantified across all dentate subregions, is consistent with Folweiler et al. (2020). However previous studies have identified post-FPI loss of PV neurons restricted to the dentate hilus and altered inhibition after FPI (Santhakumar et al., 2000; Folweiler et al., 2020). Whereas loss of immature and highly excitable adult born neurons born prior to injury could contribute to deficits in encoding novel object location, studies using the cortical impact injury have reported no loss of GCs born prior to injury (Kang et al., 2022). Rather, these neurons support enhanced feedback inhibition 8–10 weeks after injury. Moreover, it should be noted that neurogenesis is increased rather than decreased one week after injury (Shapiro, 2016; Neuberger et al., 2017a; Clark et al., 2020; Correll et al., 2021) and adult born neurons support local circuit feedback inhibition of mature GCs 4–6 weeks into development (Temprana et al., 2015; Miller and Sahay, 2019). Taken together, it is unlikely that injury induced changes in dentate neurogenesis underlie deficits in spatial pattern separation observed one week after injury. Instead, post-injury reduction of feedback inhibition, due to loss of somatostatin neurons, and increases in basal activity of GCs, revealed by the enhanced ΔFosB staining, likely impair the ability of the dentate circuit to effectively decorrelate entorhinal inputs into discrete active GC ensembles and firing patterns.
Reconciling the modest loss in cellular temporal decorrelation with profound impairment in behavioral spatial discrimination.
The apparent divergence in effect of brain injury on decorrelation of spike trains at the cellular level and discrimination of spatial location at a behavioral level indicate that disambiguation of information likely involves activation of distinct neuronal ensembles by input patterns. This is consistent with findings in computational models (Myers and Scharfman, 2009, 2011). Experimentally, due to the time for genetically encoded reporters to express (Guenthner et al., 2013; Ramirez et al., 2013), it may be challenging to identify neurons activated by two distinct and recent spatial inputs. However, there is some evidence for sparse but shared activation of neurons by different spatial experiences (Tashiro et al., 2007). The basal increase in neuronal excitability, identified by increase in ΔFosB labeled GCs after brain injury, could corrupt this sparse and selective activity necessary for discrimination of spatial memories. A potential caveat is that, whereas the circuit experiments focused on the outer molecular layer, which receives the lateral entorhinal cortical fibers carrying contextual information, the spatial information examined in the behavioral spatial discrimination study is thought to be carried by inputs from the medial entorhinal cortex. Future studies examining decorrelation of medial perforant path inputs and behavioral analysis of context encoding could resolve whether the differences identified here are pathway specific. Analysis of spatiotemporal activity patterns of neuronal ensembles during behaviors or imaging circuit activity in vitro in response to spatiotemporal input patterns would help resolve how the dentate disambiguates input patterns.
In summary, our study identifies that early posttraumatic changes, including persistent increase in excitability and loss of somatostatin interneurons, reduce temporal pattern separation by dentate GCs and degrade the ability to discriminate between similar spatial locations. These changes likely contribute to working memory deficits after brain injury.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Krista Marrero for thoughtful comments and discussion.
Funding
The project was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) NINDS R01 NS069861, R01NS097750 to V.S., NIH/NINDS F31NS110220 to L.C, American Epilepsy Society (AES) # 695548 and F31NS120620 to S.N, and AES #957615 and NIH F31NS131052 to A.H.
Funding Statement
The project was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) NINDS R01 NS069861, R01NS097750 to V.S., NIH/NINDS F31NS110220 to L.C, American Epilepsy Society (AES) # 695548 and F31NS120620 to S.N, and AES #957615 and NIH F31NS131052 to A.H.
Footnotes
Declaration of Interest: None
Reference List
- Afrasiabi M, Gupta A, Xu H, Swietek B, Santhakumar V (2021) Differential Activity-Dependent Increase in Synaptic Inhibition and Parvalbumin Interneuron Recruitment in Dentate Granule Cells and Semilunar Granule Cells. Journal of Neuroscience. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aimone JB, Deng W, Gage FH (2011) Resolving new memories: a critical look at the dentate gyrus, adult neurogenesis, and pattern separation. Neuron 70:589–596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alosco ML et al. (2023) Neuropsychological test performance of former American football players. Alzheimers Res Ther 15:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andreasen M, Hablitz JJ (1994) Paired-pulse facilitation in the dentate gyrus: a patch-clamp study in rat hippocampus in vitro. J Neurophysiol 72:326–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Annegers JF, Coan SP (2000) The risks of epilepsy after traumatic brain injury. Seizure 9:453–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arciniega H, Shires J, Furlong S, Kilgore-Gomez A, Cerreta A, Murray NG, Berryhill ME (2021) Impaired visual working memory and reduced connectivity in undergraduates with a history of mild traumatic brain injury. Sci Rep 11:2789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bekinschtein P, Kent BA, Oomen CA, Clemenson GD, Gage FH, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ (2013) BDNF in the dentate gyrus is required for consolidation of “pattern-separated” memories. Cell reports 5:759–768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonislawski DP, Schwarzbach EP, Cohen AS (2007) Brain injury impairs dentate gyrus inhibitory efficacy. Neurobiol Dis 25:163–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Braganza O, Mueller-Komorowska D, Kelly T, Beck H (2020) Quantitative properties of a feedback circuit predict frequency-dependent pattern separation. eLife 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buzsaki G (2010) Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers. Neuron 68:362–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cayco-Gajic NA, Silver RA (2019) Re-evaluating Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Pattern Separation. Neuron 101:584–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark LR, Yun S, Acquah NK, Kumar PL, Metheny HE, Paixao RCC, Cohen AS, Eisch AJ (2020) Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Induces Transient, Sequential Increases in Proliferation, Neuroblasts/Immature Neurons, and Cell Survival: A Time Course Study in the Male Mouse Dentate Gyrus. Front Neurosci 14:612749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clelland CD, Choi M, Romberg C, Clemenson GD Jr., Fragniere A, Tyers P, Jessberger S, Saksida LM, Barker RA, Gage FH, Bussey TJ (2009) A functional role for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in spatial pattern separation. Science 325:210–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Correll EA, Ramser BJ, Knott MV, McCullumsmith RE, McGuire JL, Ngwenya LB (2021) Deficits in pattern separation and dentate gyrus proliferation after rodent lateral fluid percussion injury. IBRO Neurosci Rep 10:31–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eichenbaum H (2013) Memory on time. Trends Cogn Sci 17:81–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folweiler KA, Samuel S, Metheny HE, Cohen AS (2018) Diminished Dentate Gyrus Filtering of Cortical Input Leads to Enhanced Area Ca3 Excitability after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 35:1304–1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folweiler KA, Xiong G, Best KM, Metheny HE, Nah G, Cohen AS (2020) Traumatic Brain Injury Diminishes Feedforward Activation of Parvalbumin-Expressing Interneurons in the Dentate Gyrus. eNeuro 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frankowski JC, Kim YJ, Hunt RF (2019) Selective vulnerability of hippocampal interneurons to graded traumatic brain injury. Neurobiol Dis 129:208–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilbert PE, Kesner RP, Lee I (2001) Dissociating hippocampal subregions: double dissociation between dentate gyrus and CA1. Hippocampus 11:626–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GoodSmith D, Chen X, Wang C, Kim SH, Song H, Burgalossi A, Christian KM, Knierim JJ (2017) Spatial Representations of Granule Cells and Mossy Cells of the Dentate Gyrus. Neuron 93:677–690 e675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guenthner CJ, Miyamichi K, Yang HH, Heller HC, Luo L (2013) Permanent genetic access to transiently active neurons via TRAP: targeted recombination in active populations. Neuron 78:773–784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta A, Elgammal FS, Proddutur A, Shah S, Santhakumar V (2012) Decrease in tonic inhibition contributes to increase in dentate semilunar granule cell excitability after brain injury. J Neurosci 32:2523–2537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta A, Dovek L, Proddutur A, Elgammal FS, Santhakumar V (2022) Long-Term Effects of Moderate Concussive Brain Injury During Adolescence on Synaptic and Tonic GABA Currents in Dentate Granule Cells and Semilunar Granule Cells. Front Neurosci 16:800733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta A, Proddutur A, Chang YJ, Raturi V, Guevarra J, Shah Y, Elgammal FS, Santhakumar V (2020) Dendritic morphology and inhibitory regulation distinguish dentate semilunar granule cells from granule cells through distinct stages of postnatal development. Brain structure & function 225:2841–2855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hainmueller T, Bartos M (2020) Dentate gyrus circuits for encoding, retrieval and discrimination of episodic memories. Nat Rev Neurosci 21:153–168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamm RJ, Temple MD, Pike BR, O’Dell DM, Buck DL, Lyeth BG (1996) Working memory deficits following traumatic brain injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma 13:317–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kahn JB, Port RG, Yue C, Takano H, Coulter DA (2019) Circuit-based interventions in the dentate gyrus rescue epilepsy-associated cognitive dysfunction. Brain 142:2705–2721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang YJ, Lee SH, Boychuk JA, Butler CR, Juras JA, Cloyd RA, Smith BN (2022) Adult Born Dentate Granule Cell Mediated Upregulation of Feedback Inhibition in a Mouse Model of Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurosci 42:7077–7093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kerloch T, Clavreul S, Goron A, Abrous DN, Pacary E (2019) Dentate Granule Neurons Generated During Perinatal Life Display Distinct Morphological Features Compared With Later-Born Neurons in the Mouse Hippocampus. Cereb Cortex 29:3527–3539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kernie SG, Parent JM (2010) Forebrain neurogenesis after focal Ischemic and traumatic brain injury. Neurobiol Dis 37:267–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kesner RP (2013) An analysis of the dentate gyrus function. Behav Brain Res 254:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobayashi K, Poo MM (2004) Spike train timing-dependent associative modification of hippocampal CA3 recurrent synapses by mossy fibers. Neuron 41:445–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korgaonkar AA, Nguyen S, Li Y, Sekhar D, Subramanian D, Guevarra J, Pang KCH, Santhakumar V (2020a) Distinct cellular mediators drive the Janus faces of toll-like receptor 4 regulation of network excitability which impacts working memory performance after brain injury. Brain Behav Immun 88:381–395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korgaonkar AA, Li Y, Sekhar D, Subramanian D, Guevarra J, Swietek B, Pallottie A, Singh S, Kella K, Elkabes S, Santhakumar V (2020b) Toll-like Receptor 4 Signaling in Neurons Enhances Calcium-Permeable alpha-Amino-3-Hydroxy-5-Methyl-4-Isoxazolepropionic Acid Receptor Currents and Drives Post-Traumatic Epileptogenesis. Ann Neurol 87:497–515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S, Rao SL, Chandramouli BA, Pillai S (2013) Reduced contribution of executive functions in impaired working memory performance in mild traumatic brain injury patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:1326–1332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larimer P, Strowbridge BW (2010) Representing information in cell assemblies: persistent activity mediated by semilunar granule cells. Nature neuroscience 13:213–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leh SE, Schroeder C, Chen JK, Mallar Chakravarty M, Park MT, Cheung B, Huntgeburth SC, Gosselin N, Hock C, Ptito A, Petrides M (2017) Microstructural Integrity of Hippocampal Subregions Is Impaired after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 34:1402–1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leutgeb JK, Leutgeb S, Moser MB, Moser EI (2007) Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus and CA3 of the hippocampus. Science 315:961–966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Korgaonkar AA, Swietek B, Wang J, Elgammal FS, Elkabes S, Santhakumar V (2015) Toll-like receptor 4 enhancement of non-NMDA synaptic currents increases dentate excitability after brain injury. Neurobiol Dis 74:240–253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowenstein DH, Thomas MJ, Smith DH, McIntosh TK (1992) Selective vulnerability of dentate hilar neurons following traumatic brain injury: a potential mechanistic link between head trauma and disorders of the hippocampus. J Neurosci 12:4846–4853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madar AD, Ewell LA, Jones MV (2019a) Pattern separation of spiketrains in hippocampal neurons. Sci Rep 9:5282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madar AD, Ewell LA, Jones MV (2019b) Temporal pattern separation in hippocampal neurons through multiplexed neural codes. PLoS computational biology 15:e1006932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madar AD, Pfammatter JA, Bordenave J, Plumley EI, Ravi S, Cowie M, Wallace EP, Hermann BP, Maganti RK, Jones MV (2021) Deficits in Behavioral and Neuronal Pattern Separation in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J Neurosci 41:9669–9686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McAllister TW (1992) Neuropsychiatric sequelae of head injuries. Psychiatr Clin North Am 15:395–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McHugh T, Laforce R Jr., Gallagher P, Quinn S, Diggle P, Buchanan L (2006) Natural history of the long-term cognitive, affective, and physical sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Cogn 60:209–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McHugh TJ, Jones MW, Quinn JJ, Balthasar N, Coppari R, Elmquist JK, Lowell BB, Fanselow MS, Wilson MA, Tonegawa S (2007) Dentate gyrus NMDA receptors mediate rapid pattern separation in the hippocampal network. Science 317:94–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meier TB, Savitz J, Singh R, Teague TK, Bellgowan PS (2016) Smaller Dentate Gyrus and CA2 and CA3 Volumes Are Associated with Kynurenine Metabolites in Collegiate Football Athletes. J Neurotrauma 33:1349–1357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller SM, Sahay A (2019) Functions of adult-born neurons in hippocampal memory interference and indexing. Nat Neurosci 22:1565–1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morales C, Morici JF, Espinosa N, Sacson A, Lara-Vasquez A, Garcia-Perez MA, Bekinschtein P, Weisstaub NV, Fuentealba P (2021) Dentate Gyrus Somatostatin Cells are Required for Contextual Discrimination During Episodic Memory Encoding. Cereb Cortex 31:1046–1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morris AM, Churchwell JC, Kesner RP, Gilbert PE (2012) Selective lesions of the dentate gyrus produce disruptions in place learning for adjacent spatial locations. Neurobiol Learn Mem 97:326–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myers CE, Scharfman HE (2009) A role for hilar cells in pattern separation in the dentate gyrus: a computational approach. Hippocampus 19:321–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myers CE, Scharfman HE (2011) Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus: a role for the CA3 backprojection. Hippocampus 21:1190–1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakashiba T, Cushman JD, Pelkey KA, Renaudineau S, Buhl DL, McHugh TJ, Rodriguez Barrera V, Chittajallu R, Iwamoto KS, McBain CJ, Fanselow MS, Tonegawa S (2012) Young dentate granule cells mediate pattern separation, whereas old granule cells facilitate pattern completion. Cell 149:188–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neuberger EJ, Swietek B, Corrubia L, Prasanna A, Santhakumar V (2017a) Enhanced Dentate Neurogenesis after Brain Injury Undermines Long-Term Neurogenic Potential and Promotes Seizure Susceptibility. Stem Cell Reports 9:972–984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neuberger EJ, Gupta A, Subramanian D, Korgaonkar AA, Santhakumar V (2017b) Converging early responses to brain injury pave the road to epileptogenesis. J Neurosci Res. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neunuebel JP, Knierim JJ (2014) CA3 retrieves coherent representations from degraded input: direct evidence for CA3 pattern completion and dentate gyrus pattern separation. Neuron 81:416–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ngwenya LB, Danzer SC (2018) Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury on Neurogenesis. Front Neurosci 12:1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Overstreet-Wadiche LS, Westbrook GL (2006) Functional maturation of adult-generated granule cells. Hippocampus 16:208–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramirez S, Tonegawa S, Liu X (2013) Identification and optogenetic manipulation of memory engrams in the hippocampus. Front Behav Neurosci 7:226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rangel LM, Alexander AS, Aimone JB, Wiles J, Gage FH, Chiba AA, Quinn LK (2014) Temporally selective contextual encoding in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. Nat Commun 5:3181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rao V, Lyketsos C (2000) Neuropsychiatric sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Psychosomatics 41:95–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rolls ET, Kesner RP (2006) A computational theory of hippocampal function, and empirical tests of the theory. ProgNeurobiol 79:1–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rusnak M (2013) Traumatic brain injury: Giving voice to a silent epidemic. Nat Rev Neurol 9:186–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santhakumar V, Ratzliff AD, Jeng J, Toth K, Soltesz I (2001) Long-term hyperexcitability in the hippocampus after experimental head trauma. AnnNeurol 50:708–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santhakumar V, Bender R, Frotscher M, Ross ST, Hollrigel GS, Toth Z, Soltesz I (2000) Granule cell hyperexcitability in the early post-traumatic rat dentate gyrus: the ‘irritable mossy cell’ hypothesis. J Physiol 524 Pt 1:117–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Save L, Baude A, Cossart R (2018) Temporal Embryonic Origin Critically Determines Cellular Physiology in the Dentate Gyrus. Cereb Cortex. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senzai Y, Buzsaki G (2017) Physiological Properties and Behavioral Correlates of Hippocampal Granule Cells and Mossy Cells. Neuron 93:691–704 e695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shapiro LA (2016) Altered hippocampal neurogenesis during the first 7 days after a fluid percussion traumatic brain injury. Cell Transplant. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith CJ, Xiong G, Elkind JA, Putnam B, Cohen AS (2015) Brain Injury Impairs Working Memory and Prefrontal Circuit Function. Frontiers in neurology 6:240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith CJ, Johnson BN, Elkind JA, See JM, Xiong G, Cohen AS (2012) Investigations on alterations of hippocampal circuit function following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE: e4411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tashiro A, Makino H, Gage FH (2007) Experience-specific functional modification of the dentate gyrus through adult neurogenesis: a critical period during an immature stage. J Neurosci 27:3252–3259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Temprana SG, Mongiat LA, Yang SM, Trinchero MF, Alvarez DD, Kropff E, Giacomini D, Beltramone N, Lanuza GM, Schinder AF (2015) Delayed coupling to feedback inhibition during a critical period for the integration of adult-born granule cells. Neuron 85:116–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tort AB, Komorowski R, Kopell N, Eichenbaum H (2011) A mechanism for the formation of hippocampal neuronal firing patterns that represent what happens where. Learning & memory 18:718–727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toth Z, Hollrigel GS, Gorcs T, Soltesz I (1997) Instantaneous perturbation of dentate interneuronal networks by a pressure wave-transient delivered to the neocortex. J Neurosci 17:8106–8117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsirka V, Simos P, Vakis A, Vourkas M, Arzoglou V, Syrmos N, Stavropoulos S, Micheloyannis S (2010) Material-specific difficulties in episodic memory tasks in mild traumatic brain injury. Int J Neurosci 120:184–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vaishnavi S, Rao V, Fann JR (2009) Neuropsychiatric problems after traumatic brain injury: unraveling the silent epidemic. Psychosomatics 50:198–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Dijk MT, Fenton AA (2018) On How the Dentate Gyrus Contributes to Memory Discrimination. Neuron 98:832–845 e835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Witgen BM, Lifshitz J, Smith ML, Schwarzbach E, Liang SL, Grady MS, Cohen AS (2005) Regional hippocampal alteration associated with cognitive deficit following experimental brain injury: a systems, network and cellular evaluation. Neuroscience 133:1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yassa MA, Stark CE (2011) Pattern separation in the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci 34:515–525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yim MY, Hanuschkin A, Wolfart J (2015) Intrinsic rescaling of granule cells restores pattern separation ability of a dentate gyrus network model during epileptic hyperexcitability. Hippocampus 25:297–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- You JC, Muralidharan K, Park JW, Petrof I, Pyfer MS, Corbett BF, LaFrancois JJ, Zheng Y, Zhang X, Mohila CA, Yoshor D, Rissman RA, Nestler EJ, Scharfman HE, Chin J (2017) Epigenetic suppression of hippocampal calbindin-D28k by DeltaFosB drives seizure-related cognitive deficits. Nat Med 23:1377–1383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu TS, Zhang G, Liebl DJ, Kernie SG (2008) Traumatic brain injury-induced hippocampal neurogenesis requires activation of early nestin-expressing progenitors. JNeurosci 28:12901–12912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.