Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2023 Sep 13:2023.09.12.23295454. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.09.12.23295454

Table 3:

Count and proportion of visits missing staging information in each system and proportion of all patients with at least one visit with most-severe stage

Classification System Total visits Number of staged visits Number of non-evaluable visits Proportion of all visits non-evaluable Average Proportion Missing Per Patient†† Most Severe Stage Proportion of Patients with at least one most-severe score Proportion all patients with at least one most-severe score, excluding patients with only non-evaluable stages
CAPARROTTI 1063 626 437 0.411 0.423 4 0.151 0.182
CLAYMAN 1063 989 74 0.070 0.054 2 0.835 0.847
COFFIN 1063 202 861 0.810 0.783 Major 0.057 0.152
CTCAE 1063 867 196 0.184 0.206 3 0.057 0.066
GLANZMANN 1063 379 684 0.643 0.794 2 0.165 0.449
KARAGOZOGLU 1063 637 426 0.401 0.434 3 0.061 0.088
LYONS 1063 355 708 0.666 0.712 4 0.071 0.176
MARX 1063 160 903 0.849 0.926 3 0.024 0.185
MORTON 1063 170 893 0.840 0.800 Major 0.057 0.164
NOTANI 1063 878 185 0.174 0.209 3 0.113 0.132
RadORN 1063 1063 0 0.000 0.000 3 0.057 0.057
RTOG/EORTC 1063 872 191 0.180 0.193 4 0.009 0.011
SCHWARTZ 1063 728 335 0.315 0.323 3b 0.019 0.025
SOMA 1063 763 300 0.282 0.313 3 0.075 0.116
STORE 1063 983 80 0.075 0.065 4 0.038 0.047
SHAW 1063 574 489 0.460 0.501 3 0.047 0.049
TSAI 1063 699 364 0.342 0.362 4 0.042 0.057

Non-evaluable: missing sufficient data to determine stage from medical chart review.

††

average proportion of visits where no stage could be generated, per patient