Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 2023 Aug 17;51(17):9432–9441. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad668

Structural basis for the selective methylation of 5-carboxymethoxyuridine in tRNA modification

Jaehun Yoo 1, Jangmin Lee 2, Jungwook Kim 3,
PMCID: PMC10516636  PMID: 37587716

Abstract

Posttranscriptional modifications of tRNA are widely conserved in all domains of life. Especially, those occurring within the anticodon often modulate translational efficiency. Derivatives of 5-hydroxyuridine are specifically found in bacterial tRNA, where 5-methoxyuridine and 5-carboxymethoxyuridine are the major species in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. In certain tRNA species, 5-carboxymethoxyuridine can be further methylated by CmoM to form the methyl ester. In this report, we present the X-ray crystal structure of Escherichia coli CmoM complexed with tRNASer1, which contains 5-carboxymethoxyuridine at the 5′-end of anticodon (the 34th position of tRNA). The 2.22 Å resolution structure of the enzyme-tRNA complex reveals that both the protein and tRNA undergo local conformational changes around the binding interface. Especially, the hypomodified uracil base is flipped out from the canonical stacked conformation enabling the specific molecular interactions with the enzyme. Moreover, the structure illustrates that the enzyme senses exclusively the anticodon arm region of the substrate tRNA and examines the presence of key determinants, 5-carboxymethoxyuridine at position 34 and guanosine at position 35, offering molecular basis for the discriminatory mechanism against non-cognate tRNAs.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Transfer RNA (tRNA) delivers a codon-specific amino acid to ribosome playing a central role as an adaptor during translation (1). Most RNA molecules undergo posttranscriptional modifications; over 150 distinct modifications have been identified in RNA, where 80% of those are found in tRNAs (2). On average, bacterial and eukaryotic tRNA contains 8 and 13 modifications per molecule (3), respectively. Lack of proper post-transcriptional modifications in tRNA affects mRNA decoding capabilities (4), cellular growth (5) and regulatory function (6). In humans, certain irregular tRNA modifications have been associated with neurodegenerative and metabolic diseases (7).

Uridines at the wobble position (position 34) are almost invariably modified in cytosolic tRNA (8,9), especially at the C2 and C5 atoms of the uracil nucleobases (10). In bacteria, wobble uridine modifications fall into two groups, 5-methyluridine (xm5U) or 5-hydroxyuridine (xo5U) derivatives (11). A number of xo5U-type modifications have been found in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including 5-carboxymethoxyuridine (cmo5U) and 5-methoxycarbonylmethoxyuridine (mcmo5U) for the former, and 5-methoxyuridine (mo5U) for the latter. Lately, biosynthetic pathways for xo5U-type modifications have been fully characterized as summarized in Figure 1A. In the first step, U34 is hydroxylated at C5 to yield 5-hydroxyuridine (ho5U) by O2-dependent TrhO or prephenate-dependent TrhP (12,13). In Gram-positive bacteria, TrmR converts ho5U to mo5U using S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) as the methyl donor (14). In Gram-negative bacteria, CmoB converts ho5U to cmo5U employing a unique metabolite carboxy-SAM (cxSAM) as the carboxymethyl donor, which is assembled from prephenate and SAM by CmoA (15,16). The wobble cmo5U in certain tRNAs are further methylated by SAM-dependent CmoM to produce its methyl ester, mcmo5U. Additionally, 2′-O-ribose methylation of mcmo5U occurs occasionally (∼4.2%) by TrmL to yield mcmo5Um in tRNASer1 (17).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

xo-type wobble uridine modifications in bacterial tRNA. (A) Summary of the biosynthesis of xo5U34 modification in bacterial tRNA. Colors in chemical structures match those of the enzymatic activity. (B) Gene sequences that encode tRNA anticodon arm containing cmo5U34 and mcmo5U34. Anticodon is colored in red.

The tRNA-modifying activity and the specificity of E. coli CmoM was first reported by Suzuki and his colleagues, who identified that mcmo5U34 was present in tRNAAla1, tRNASer1, tRNAPro3 and tRNAThr4, whereas cmo5U34 was in tRNALeu3 and tRNAVal1 (17) (Figure 1B). Authors also demonstrated that the terminal methyl group of the mcmo5U contributed to preventing frameshift during decoding GCG codon, although no detectable growth defects could be observed with cmoM-deficient mutant cells. CmoM belongs to Class I SAM-dependent methyltransferase family and the SAM-bound structure of CmoM from E. coli str. O157:H7 is available (PDB ID: 4HTF). However, it is not clear how the enzyme interacts with a specific tRNA substrate and installs the methyl group on the hypomodified wobble uridine as this structure lacks RNA component.

Here, we report an X-ray crystal structure of E. coli CmoM complexed with sinefungin, an analog of SAM, and cellularly expressed E. coli tRNASer1 containing cmo5U at the wobble position. The 2.22 Å resolution complex structure clearly unveils detailed molecular interactions between cmo5U and the enzyme at atomic level, providing critical clues to the molecular basis for discriminating the cognate versus non-cognate tRNAs. Combined with the structural information, we further verified the specificity elements within both tRNA and the enzyme by examining the cellular and in vitro activities of CmoM variants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cloning and protein purification of CmoM variants

E. coli cmoM gene implemented on pCA24N vector was obtained from the E. coli ASKA library (NBRP, Japan). Point mutations were introduced by in vivo mutagenesis as described previously (18). Primers used for cloning are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Sequences were verified by standard sequencing (Macrogen, Korea). E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells were transformed with the vectors harboring a cmoM variant, grown in LB containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin at 37°C, and induced with 0.5 mM Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at an OD600 of ∼0.6. Cells were further incubated at 20°C overnight and harvested by centrifugation. Cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) and 150 mM NaCl) and sonicated for 30 min. The lysate was centrifuged at 39 000 g for 30 min and the supernatants were applied to the HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare) charged with Ni2+. The column was equilibrated with wash buffer (25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, and 20 mM imidazole) and eluted with a linear gradient of imidazole (0.02–0.5 M). Purified protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and buffer exchanged with the lysis buffer using Amicon centrifugal filters (Merck). An extinction coefficient of ϵ280 = 42 400 M−1 cm−1 was used to calculate the concentration of the protein.

Determination of molecular weight of CmoM by size exclusion chromatography

The molecular weight of recombinant CmoM was determined by size exclusion using Superdex 75gl column (GE Healthcare, Life Sciences) on NGC FPLC system (Biorad). 100 μg of the wild-type CmoM (calculated monomer molecular weight = 31.7 kDa) was loaded onto the column with mobile phase (25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) and 150 mM NaCl) at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Elution of ovalbumin (44 kDa) and MnmC (76 kDa) from the column was also tested under the identical condition for comparison.

Purification of in vivo transcribed tRNA

The plasmid pBSTNAV (Addgene, USA) was used as the tRNA expression vector which contains LPP promoter and rrnC terminator. E. coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655 serT (tRNASer1(TGA)) gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction from synthetic DNA template (IDT, USA). The primers used are summarized in Supplementary Table S1. The pBSTNAV vector and the amplified PCR fragments were double digested in 37°C water bath for 2 h using the restriction enzymes EcoRI (Enzynomics, Korea) and HindIII (Enzynomics, Korea). Digested products were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. Next, ligation step was performed using T4 ligase (Enzynomics, Korea) at room temperature for 4 h, and the production of pBSTNAV-serT plasmid was confirmed by DNA sequencing (Macrogen, Korea), which was used to transform cmoM-deficient competent cell (NBRP, Japan) using heat-shock method.

For overexpression of tRNA, cmoM-deficient E. coli cells were transformed with pBSTNAV-serT plasmid and grown in 500 ml LB containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin at 37°C for 24 h. Cells were collected by centrifugation and cellular RNA was extracted by saturated phenol (pH 4.5) (Biosesang, Korea) following the manufacturer's protocol. 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.3) and isopropanol were added to precipitate RNA, followed by three times of washing with 75% (v/v) cold ethanol. RNA loading dye containing 0.025% (w/v) bromophenol blue and xylene cyanol FF in 95% (v/v) was added to the RNA solution and the mixture was applied to a 7 M urea-PAGE gel, which was run for 14 h at 40 W. The recombinantly overexpressed tRNASer1 could be resolved from endogenous tRNAs on the gel due to the difference in size. The band containing the desired tRNA was excised by scalpel and tRNA was eluted from the gel strip using Elutrap (Whatman). An extinction coefficient of ϵ260 = 852 000 M−1 cm−1 was used to quantify tRNASer1. Purified tRNA was denatured at 95°C for 5 min followed by incubation on ice for 20 min before use.

Crystallization, data collection, and structure determination of CmoM-tRNASer1(cmo5UGA)-sinefungin complex

Crystallization of CmoM-tRNA complex was performed by mixing 1:4 molar ratio of CmoM and in vivo transcribed tRNASer1(cmo5UGA) extracted from cmoM-deficient cells. Sinefungin (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the mixture at the final concentration of 3 mM, which was used for co-crystallization of ternary complex of CmoM-tRNASer1(cmo5UGA)-sinefungin by sitting drop vapor diffusion method. An equal volume of the mixture was added to a reservoir solution (0.04 M magnesium acetate tetrahydrate, 0.05 M sodium cacodylate trihydrate (pH 6.0), and 30% (v/v) (+/−)-2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol) at 25°C. Hexagonal prism shaped crystals were formed in 5 days. Crystals were mounted in a nylon loop and flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data were collected on Dectris Eiger X9M detector at Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL) beamline 5C, using the wavelength λ = 0.9795 Å. Structure factors were scaled by XDS (19) and Aimless (20) under space group P6122. To solve the phases of structure factors, molecular replacement was performed with Molrep (21) using the structure of SAM-bound CmoM from E. coli str. O157:H7 (PDB ID: 4HTF) as a starting model. Extra electron densities corresponding to tRNA were evident after initial refinements with a protein-only model, which guided us to build tRNA component using Modelcraft (22). Subsequent model building and refinement were performed iteratively using Modelcraft (22), Coot (23), PDB REDO (24), REFMAC5 (25), and Phenix Refine (26). Crystallographic statistics are available in Table 1.

Table 1.

Crystallographic statistics

CmoM-tRNASer1(cmo5UGA)-sinefungin
Data collection
Wavelength (Å) 0.9795
Space group P6122
Unit cell (a, b, c) (Å) (α, β, γ) (°) 65.614, 65.614, 584.532 90 90 120
Resolution (Å) 40.74 – 2.22 (2.30–2.22)
Rmerge 0.2426 (2.553)
Rmeas 0.2462 (2.589)
Rpim 0.04123 (0.4229)
Total reflections 1 386 230 (138 756)
Unique reflections 38 928 (3750)
Mean(I)/sd(I) 16.92 (1.52)
Completeness (%) 99.94 (100.00)
Multiplicity 37.2 (37.1)
CC1/2 0.928 (0.642)
Wilson B-factor (Å2) 42.78
Refinement
Resolution range 40.74–2.22
Reflections used in refinement 38920 (3750)
Reflections used for free set 2000 (192)
R work/Rfree 0.1985/0.2252
RMSD bonds (Å) 0.007
RMSD angles (°) 0.96
Ramachandran favored (%) 98.43
Ramachandran allowed (%) 1.57
Ramachandran outliers (%) 0.00
Total number of non-hydrogen atoms 4341
Macromolecules 3956
Ligands 34
Solvent 351
Protein residues 257
Average B2) 45.50
Macromolecules 39.34
Ligands 33.77
Solvent 44.11

LC–MS analysis of in vivo transcribed tRNASer1(cmo5UGA)

70 μg of tRNASer1(cmo5UGA) was digest into nucleotides by incubating in a solution containing buffer A (50 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6.0), 5 mM ZnCl2, and 10 mM MgCl2), 1 U of P1 nuclease (Sigma-Aldrich), and 0.1 U of phosphodiesterase I (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C for 8 h. For generation of nucleosides, 1 U of FastAP (Thermo Scientific) was added to the above mixture. The nucleotide or nucleoside sample was injected into a Bruker Impact II UPLC-QToF-MS system coupled to a reverse phase HPLC column (Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 Column 95 Å, 3.5 μm, 4.6 mm × 100 mm) for analysis in negative or positive mode, respectively. A gradient step with Solvent A (Water with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid) and Solvent B (Acetonitrile with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid) were applied at a flow rate of 0.4 min/ml as the following; (i) 1–12% of solvent B for 0–17.5 min; (ii) 12–70% of solvent B for 17.5–20 min; (iii) 70% of solvent B for 20–25 min; (iv) 1% of solvent B for 25–55 min. The ESI parameters were set as the following: end plate offset: 500 V, capillary: 4500 V, nebulizer: 4 bar, dry gas: 8 l/min, dry temperature: 200°C. The collision energy was set to 20 eV. MS peaks were extracted from MZmine2 software (27) and plotted using Prism software (version 5.0, GraphPad, USA).

HPLC based in vitro activity assays of CmoM variants

0.5 μM CmoM was added to the solution containing 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 50 μM tRNA and 100 μM SAM to initiate enzyme reaction. Reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 0–5 min and the reaction was terminated by addition of 0.05% (v/v) formic acid. Sample was injected to a normal phase HPLC column (SeQuent ZIC-HILIC Column, 200 Å, 5 μm, 4.6 × 150 mm) for analysis of SAM and S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine (SAH) peaks. A gradient step with Solvent C (5 mM ammonium formate, pH 3.3) and Solvent D (Acetonitrile:50 mM ammonium formate, pH 3.3 = 90:10) were applied at a flow rate of 1 min/ml as the following; (i) 0% of solvent C (100% of solvent D) for 0–8 min; (ii) 0–60% of solvent C for 8–20 min; (iii) 100% of solvent C for 20–25 min; (iv) 0% of solvent C (100% of solvent D) for 25–35 min. The DAD detector was set to 260 nm, 5 Hz.

RESULTS

The overall structure of CmoM-tRNASer1(cmo5UGA)-sinefungin complex

To investigate the molecular interaction between the enzyme and the hypomodified base, cmo5U34, we employed recombinantly expressed and purified tRNASer1 from cmoM-deficient E. coli mutant for structural study (Figure 2A). In addition, an analog of SAM, sinefungin, was used for co-crystallization of the ternary complex to mimic a substrate-bound state of CmoM. The X-ray co-crystal structure of CmoM-tRNASer1(cmo5UGA)-sinefungin was determined to 2.22 Å resolution (Figure 2B). The asymmetric unit of the X-ray crystal structure contains a tRNA molecule bound to a protomer of CmoM, mainly through the anticodon loop on the protein surface enriched with positive charges (Figure 2C). The previously reported SAM-bound structure (PDB ID: 4HTF) displays a dimeric form of the enzyme and an essentially identical dimer can be generated with a symmetry-related protomer from our structure (Figure 2D). We examined the oligomeric state of CmoM via size-exclusion chromatography, where the results were consistent with the dimeric form (Supplementary Figure S1). Analysis of the dimeric interface of the protein reveals that the dimerization is mainly driven by polar interactions involving a total of eight residues from each protomer (Supplementary Figure S2) (28). Overall, the residue interactions at the dimer interface in our complex structure are essentially identical to those in the SAM-bound structure. In detail, the sidechain of R234 interacts with the carbonyl oxygen of Q169, while the imidazole ring of H153 interacts with the hydroxyl group of Y241. The remaining eight residues form a complex hydrogen bond network at the core of the interface. The sidechain of R216 interacts with the backbone carbonyl oxygens from both D213 and L215, whereas the backbone amide group of R216 interacts with the carbonyl oxygen of V161.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Crystal structure of E. coli CmoM-tRNASer1-sinefungin complex. (A) Sequence of cellularly transcribed tRNASer1(cmo5UGA) from ΔcmoM E. coli including known modifications, which was used for crystallography and biochemical assays in this study. (B) Overall structure of E. coli CmoM complexed with tRNASer1(cmo5UGA) and sinefungin. CmoM and tRNASer1(cmo5UGA) are shown in marine and orange ribbons, respectively. Sinefungin is represented in sphere, where carbon is shown in grey, oxygen in red, and nitrogen in blue. (C) Docking site of tRNA (orange) on CmoM is shown, where electrostatic potential is mapped on the surface of the enzyme (positive in blue, negative in red, and neutral in white). (D) Superposition of reconstituted dimer of CmoM-tRNA complex (marine and orange for CmoM and tRNA, respectively) and tRNA-free CmoM (PDB ID: 4htf, yellow) structures.

CmoM is a member of Class I SAM-dependent methyltransferases (MTases), which adopts a Rossmann-fold with a β-sheet architecture of 3–2–1–4–5–7–6, where the 7th β-strand lies antiparallel to other β-strands (Supplementary Figure S3) (29). Ten α-helices flanking the β-sheet form a sandwich-like αβα-fold as observed in numerous Class I MTases (30). Other characteristic features of this family include the presence of conserved elements involved in SAM binding, such as the glycine-rich motif at the β1 (G52–G53–G54) and the amino acid residues D73 at the end of β2 and R26 at the first one-third position of α2, which interact with the ribose hydroxyl groups and the methionine carboxylate, respectively. Other residues such as D3, A101, and Q102 recognizes SAM’s adenine whereas Y18 interacts with the methionine carboxylate (Supplementary Figure S4). The search for structural homologs with the DALI server (31) yielded an ubiquinone/menaquinone biosynthesis methyltransferase-related protein from Thermotoga maritima (PDB ID: 2AVN) as a top hit, with an z-score of 25.9 and a root-mean-square deviation (r.m.s.d.) of 2.7 Å, which shares a sequence identity of 21% with CmoM over 248 residues (Supplementary Figure S5).

The overall conformation of tRNA-complexed CmoM observed in our model is not significantly different from that of the tRNA-free state, where the superposition of both structures results in an r.m.s.d. of 0.450 Å. Moreover, the microenvironment around sinefungin is highly homologous to that of the SAM binding site in the tRNA-free structure, where sinefungin fits identically as the conformation of SAM. Notably, a total of seven Mg2+ sites were identified around tRNA in our model. Only two of those are directly coordinated to the phosphate oxygen of C48 and A59, whereas the others are in contact with tRNA molecule indirectly through water shell (Supplementary Figure S6).

tRNA recognition by CmoM

There are a couple of substantial changes in local conformation induced by the tRNA-binding (Figure 3A). The N-terminal helix (α1) swings towards the bound tRNA by approximately 30 Å to establish contact with phosphate groups of C32 and U33. Another notable change is observed in the organization of the loop encompassing residues 170–188, which is mostly disordered in the tRNA-free structure. In the tRNA-bound state, this loop mainly interacts with the phosphates of G30, U31, A36, and i6A37 through the formation of salt bridges. All in all, eight nucleotides of tRNA (G30 through i6A37) are in direct contact with CmoM, six of which are located on the anticodon loop (Figure 3B,C). A total of 18 amino acid residues are found at the interface with tRNA, where eight of those sense the shape of the phosphate backbone on the anticodon loop through making salt-bridges or hydrogen bonds; i.e. K177 with G30, R178 with G30 and U31, K12 with C32 and U33, N16 with U33 and cmo5U34, K22 with cmo5U34, H158 and R246 with G35, and K176 with A36 and i6A37. Four amino acid residues make contact with the ribose ring of cmo5U34 and G35 by forming hydrogen bonds; i.e. the sidechains of Y150 and S181 with the 2′-hydroxyl group of cmo5U34, whereas those of N159 and N164 with the O4’ of G35.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Intermolecular interactions between CmoM and tRNA. (A) Superposed structures of tRNA-complexed (marine) and tRNA-free (PDB ID: 4htf, yellow) CmoM, where the inset highlights a large shift of α1 helix upon binding of tRNA. (B) Active site residues of CmoM (blue) that interact with tRNA anticodon loop region (orange). Sinefungin is shown in grey sticks. (C) A schematic diagram tRNA showing polar interactions with the enzyme at each residue, where the phosphate is represented by circle, ribose by pentagon, and base by square. Amino acids associated with the phosphate backbone (blue), sugar (orange), and base (black) are grouped in brackets for individual nucleotides. Amino acid residues interacting with nucleobase of (D) U33, (E) cmo5U34 and (F) G35 are shown, where dashed lines represent hydrogen bonding interaction. Distance between the amine of sinefungin and the carboxyl group of cmo5U34 is labeled in Å.

Only three nucleobases of the entire tRNA molecule, U33, cmo5U34, and G35, participate in ionic or polar interactions with the protein. U33 appears to interact solely with K218 by forming a hydrogen bond via the O2 of uracil (Figure 3D). Meanwhile, the hypomodified base of cmo5U34, which has flipped out from the canonical stacking position, exhibits the most extensive interactions with the enzyme (Figure 3E). A total of five residues are involved in multiple ionic/polar interactions with the modified uracil base, where the 5-carboxymethoxy group is thoroughly examined by R26, W124 and Y247. Notably, R26 of CmoM forms a salt bridge and hydrogen bond with the carboxyl and ether oxygen, respectively. Furthermore, the carboxyl group on the modified uracil base engages in a hydrogen bonding network with the side chains of W124 and Y247. Therefore, these three residues appear to be primarily responsible for the proper positioning of the nucleophilic carboxyl group on cmo5U34, which is approximately 3 Å away from the Nϵ of sinefungin. Lastly, K22 interacts with O2, and R209 interacts with N3 and O4 of cmo5U34. Meanwhile, the guanine base of G35 interacts with three amino acid residues (Figure 3F). The backbone carbonyl oxygen of A162 is within hydrogen bonding distance from N1 and N2. N164 forms hydrogen bonds with N2 and N3 via its sidechain, while K218 interacts with O6 and N7.

Biochemical analyses of key amino acid residues in tRNA binding and catalysis

To verify the functional role of the amino acid residues that were identified to interact with tRNA in our structure, site-directed mutagenesis was performed to introduce a single mutation and the biochemical activity of the mutant proteins was examined (Figure 4). Previously, Suzuki's group tested the biosynthesis of mcmo5U in tRNAPro3 from cmoM-deficient strain complemented with plasmid-encoded cmoM-variants harboring an alanine mutation at R26, D73, W124, Y150, R209, D213, R246 and Y247, which were identified around the SAM-binding site in the tRNA-free structure (17). Therefore, these residues were excluded from our investigation. Moreover, we followed the time-course of the accumulation of SAH, a coproduct of the methyltransfer reaction, to quantitatively measure the in vitro activity of the enzyme using recombinantly purified CmoM and tRNASer1 containing cmo5U at the wobble position.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Mutagenesis studies of amino acid residues participating in ionic/polar interactions with tRNA. (A) The conversion rates of cmo5U to mcmo5U by the wild-type and mutant CmoM are plotted, which have been determined through in vitro assays using SAM and tRNASer1 extracted from E. coli ΔcmoM cells. Error bars represent the standard deviation from three independent measurements at each time point. (B) Roles of amino acid residues selected for mutagenesis and relative activities of mutants are summarized, where ++ stands for the wild-type comparable, + for moderate and – for minimal activity.

The assay results highlight the importance of N164, which, along with A162 and K218, is one of the three residues recognizing G35 base. When mutated to aspartate, the mutant enzyme showed a sever diminishment in methyl transfer activity. Additionally, K22 also appears to be critical in our assay, which forms a hydrogen bond with the base and salt bridge with the phosphate of cmo5U34. Mutation of this residue to glutamate resulted in total inactivation, suggesting its importance in identifying the flipped-out base of cmo5U34. Other notable residues include K12 and N16, as the mutation of each led to a substantial decrease in activity, nearly 80% lower than that of the wild-type enzyme. Interestingly, both of these residues are located on the N-terminal helix, α1, which was observed to undergo a movement towards tRNA upon binding as shown in the structure. When we tested a mutant CmoM lacking α1, the truncated enzyme was completely inactive. This suggests that the binding of tRNA had been seriously compromised, underscoring the essential roles of the N-terminal helix. The other secondary structure that displays substantial conformational rearrangement induced by tRNA docking is the loop composed of amino acid residues from 170 to 188. Within this loop, K176, K177 and R178 are identified as interacting with the phosphate backbone of the tRNA substrate through the formation of salt bridges. While K176E and K177E did not substantially affect the enzyme activity, R178E resulted in an approximate 50% decreased activity compared to the wild-type. Meanwhile, the alanine mutant of H158, which interacts with the phosphate of G35, displays a negligible effect on methylation activity. Similarly, when K218, which interacts with both U33 and G35 bases, was altered to glutamate, the activity of the mutant was comparable to that of the wild-type. Interestingly, K218 is the only residue in the structure that contacts the U33 base, suggesting that U33 is not a crucial determinant for CmoM.

Conformation of full-length tRNASer1

All 88 nucleotides in tRNASer1 could be clearly modeled in the present structure (Figure 5A and Supplementary Figure S7). To our knowledge, this represents the first 3-D structure of a cellularly transcribed, full-length tRNASer1. The most notable feature observed in the CmoM-bound tRNA conformation is the rearrangement of the anticodon loop region, particularly the flipping out of cmo5U34, whereas anticodon bases are in general stacked on one another as observed in other free- or ribosome-bound tRNA structures (32–34) (Figure 5B). Furthermore, our tRNA structure exhibits an atypical U-turn motif within the anticodon loop, where two characteristic hydrogen bonds required for the formation of the anticodon U-turn (35) are not observed; i.e. the interaction between N3 of U33 and the phosphate of N36, as well as that between the 2′-OH of U33 and the nucleobase of N35. This deformation of the anticodon loop is likely a result of the accompanying flip-out of cmo5U34. Another interesting structural feature of the CmoM-bound tRNASer1 is the presence of a long variable arm composed of 16 nucleotide residues; C44, G45, U46, C47, C47a, C47b, G47c, A47d, A47e, A47f, G47g, G47h, G47i, A47j, U47k, and C48 (Figure 5C). This extended variable arm is significantly longer than those found in other tRNA species, which are typically composed of 4–5 nucleotides (36). The variable arm is well-defined in our structure mainly due to the lattice contacts provided by symmetry-related molecules at the unit cell interface. The stem region of the variable arm is composed of four Watson-Crick (U46-A47j, C47-G47i, C47a-G47h and C47b-G47g) and two non-canonical (G45-U47k and G47c-A47f) base pairs, which is capped with a short turn composed of four nucleotides (G47c to A47f).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Features of cellularly transcribed tRNASer1. (A) Structure of the CmoM-bound tRNA with individual regions shown in different colors; acceptor stem in purple, D-arm in salmon, anticodon arm in red (anticodon in dark grey), variable arm in blue, and T-arm in yellow. (B) Superposition of anticodon stem loops of tRNASer1 (orange) and S. cerevisiae tRNAPhe (PDB ID: 1EHZ, grey), which highlights the conformational change in tRNASer1, especially the flipping-out cmo5U34. (C) A close-up view of the long variable arm of tRNASer1. Base pairing interactions are represented in black dashed lines.

Native tRNA modifications

Because we used cellularly derived tRNA for crystallization, we attempted to model all known post-transcriptional modifications in the structure. There are seven different types of modified nucleotides in E. coli tRNASer1 in addition to the hypermodified wobble uridine (37); e.g. 4-thiouridine (s4U8), 2′-O-methylguanosine (Gm18), dihydrouridine (D20 and D20a), 2′-O-methylcytidine (Cm32), 2-methylthio-N6-isopentenyladenosine (ms2i6A37), 5-methyluridine (m5U54), and pseudouridine (P55). The presence of certain modifications was evident in the Fo – Fc differential Fourier density map, especially bulky ones such as 5-caroxymethoxy moiety on U34 and N6-isopentenyl group on A37 (Supplementary Figure S8). Interestingly, we could not model 2-methylthio group on A37 because of the complete lack of electron density, even though this residue is known to contain both N6-isopentenyl and 2-methylthio moieties (ms2i6A). Meanwhile, it was generally ambiguous to model relatively small-sized modifications based on the electron density with the given resolution, for example, D, Cm, Gm and P.

To examine whether the tRNA sample contains all the expected modifications, we analyzed the content of the recombinant tRNASer1 using mass spectrometry. The tRNA sample was digested to nucleosides or nucleotides and then subjected to ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. To obtain a comprehensive profile of posttranscriptional modifications present in the sample, the nucleosides were analyzed in positive mode, while the nucleotides containing a 5′-phosphate were analyzed in negative mode. Pseudouridine was excluded from our analyses as it cannot be distinguished from uridine through simple mass spectrometry. We confirmed the presence of the 5′-monophosphates of s4U, D, cmo5U and m5U in negative mode, while Gm, Cm and ms2i6A were observed in positive mode (Supplementary Figure S9). Surprisingly, we also detected N6-isopentenyladenosine (i6A) in both positive mode, likely as a precursor of ms2i6A at position 37, and negative mode as its 5′-monophosphate form. To determine the relative abundance of tRNA species containing ms2i6A or i6A, the intensities of the characteristic fragments, N6-isopentenyladenine and 2-methylthio-N6-isopentenyladenine, were measured using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode analysis. Based on the comparison of peak areas for each modified base, it is estimated that i6A-containing species are approximately 5.3-times more abundant than ms2i6A-containing one (Supplementary Figure S10).

DISCUSSION

The most critical determinant on tRNA for recognition by CmoM is cmo5U34. In the structure, the calculated buried surface area of this nucleotide alone accounts for approximately 30% of the total interface between the protein and tRNA (317.5 out of 1072.6 Å2). It is plausible that the flipped-out hypomodified base from the canonical stacked conformation is stabilized by the extensive intermolecular interactions with eight amino acid residues from the enzyme. Notably, R26, W124 and Y247 appear to fine-tune the orientation of the nucleophilic carboxymethoxy group on the wobble uridine to facilitate the efficient methyl transfer step. Indeed, the previous mutagenesis study showed that the enzyme activity is abolished with R26A and W124A, or partially decreased with Y247A (17). Due to its low pKa value, it is likely that the carboxymethoxy group does not require a general base to become an efficient nucleophile during methyltransfer reaction, which is further ensured by the ionic/polar interactions with those residues (Figure 6). In E. coli, it has been demonstrated that tRNAAla1, tRNASer1, tRNAPro3 and tRNAThr4, which contain mcmo5U34, have guanosine at position 35, while tRNALeu3 and tRNAVal1, which contains cmo5U34, have adenosine at the corresponding position. Therefore, G35 is likely an important determinant for CmoM in distinguishing its substrates, although a low-level mcmo5U formation in tRNALeu3 and tRNAVal1 has been reported at a frequency below 10% (17). Our structure of CmoM-tRNASer1(cmo5UGA)-sinefungin complex provides supporting evidence by unveiling detailed information on how the enzyme identifies the correct base at this position. The exocyclic amine group at C2 of guanine is one of the key structural features compared to adenine, which is specifically recognized by the amido sidechain of N164 and the backbone carbonyl group of A162. Our mutagenesis experiments further emphasize the importance of G35 recognition by N164, as the activity of N164E was almost completely abolished.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

A proposed reaction mechanism for the SAM-dependent cmo5U methylation by CmoM. Kinetically essential residues such as R26 and W124 are positioned to fine-tune the orientation of the nucleophile and prevent the binding of the protonated form to promote the nucleophilicity. Subsequently, the carboxylate of cmo5U34 attacks the S-methyl group of SAM to form mcmo5U34 and SAH.

The extended variable arm is a characteristic feature of class II tRNAs, including tRNASer, tRNALeu, tRNASec and tRNATyr (38). However, structural information on these tRNAs with a long variable arm is quite limited. Our co-crystal structure features the full-length tRNASer1 containing a 16 nt-long variable arm, although it is irrelevant to the function of CmoM. Meanwhile, it was shown that a certain stem length of the variable arm is required for recognition by seryl-tRNA synthetase (SerRS) (39). Likewise, the long variable arm of tRNASec is crucial for the serine ligation activity of SerRS (40). Structural comparison of these tRNAs reveals an overall similarity, while the variable arm of E. coli tRNASer1 resembles that of Aquifex aeolicus tRNASec (PDB ID: 3W3S) more than that of Thermos thermophilus tRNASer (PDB ID: 1SER), both of which are complexed with SerRS (Supplementary Figure S11). Structural and functional characterization of more diverse class II tRNAs will be valuable in understanding the conserved roles of long variable arms, which confer a conformational diversity to the canonical L-shaped scaffold.

Our co-crystal structure shows both expected and unexpected posttranscriptional modifications present in tRNA. Surprisingly, the structural data was consistent with i6A at position 37 instead of the expected ms2i6A. Analysis of hydrolyzed tRNA sample used for structure determination indicates that it is a mixture of both with a relative abundance of 5.3:1. In the biosynthesis of ms2i6A, MiaA and MiaB are responsible for attaching isopentenyl moiety at N6 and methylthio group at C2 of adenine ring, respectively. The cause of incomplete ms2i6A formation in our sample is unknown. One possibility is that it resulted from an artifact of using a robust overexpression system, where massive production of recombinant tRNA occurs under the strong promotor of the expression plasmid, while the rate of MiaB-dependent methylthiolation does not increase comparably. An alternative scenario is the potential non-constitutive nature of methylthiolation at A37, although it has not been reported whether MiaB-dependent modification is inducible or not. Further investigation into the cellular and biochemical regulation of MiaB will be required to address the validity of this hypothesis.

Supplementary Material

gkad668_Supplemental_File

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank 5C beamline of Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL-5C) in Pohang, South Korea, for their assistance on X-ray diffraction data collection. E. coli strains were distributed by National BioResource Project (NBRP, Japan).

Contributor Information

Jaehun Yoo, Department of Chemistry, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea.

Jangmin Lee, Department of Chemistry, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea.

Jungwook Kim, Department of Chemistry, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea.

Data Availability

The atomic coordinates and structure factors for E. coli CmoM-tRNASer1(cmo5UGA)-sinefungin are deposited to Protein Data Bank (PDB) under accession code 8JOZ.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.

FUNDING

National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1A2C2009773]. Funding for open access charge: National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1A2C2009773].

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Lyons S.M., Fay M.M., Ivanov P.. The role of RNA modifications in the regulation of tRNA cleavage. FEBS Lett. 2018; 592:2828–2844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Suzuki T. The expanding world of tRNA modifications and their disease relevance. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021; 22:375–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zhang W., Foo M., Eren A.M., Pan T.. tRNA modification dynamics from individual organisms to metaepitranscriptomics of microbiomes. Mol. Cell. 2022; 82:891–906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Weixlbaumer A., Murphy I.V., F. V., Dziergowska A., Malkiewicz A., Vendeix F.A.P., Agris P.F., Ramakrishnan V. Mechanism for expanding the decoding capacity of transfer rnas by modification of uridines. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007; 14:498–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hagervall T.G., Ericson J.U., Esberg K.B., Ji-nong L., Björk G.R.. Role of tRNA modification in translational fidelity. BBA - Gene Struct. Expr. 1990; 1050:263–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Persson B.C. Modification of tRNA as a regulatory device. Mol. Microbiol. 1993; 8:1011–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Pereira M., Francisco S., Varanda A.S., Santos M., Santos M.A.S., Soares A.R.. Impact of tRNA modifications and tRNA-modifying enzymes on proteostasis and human disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018; 19:3738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Boccaletto P., Stefaniak F., Ray A., Cappannini A., Mukherjee S., Purta E., Kurkowska M., Shirvanizadeh N., Destefanis E., Groza P.et al.. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2021 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50:D231–D235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Agris P.F. Wobble position modified nucleosides evolved to select transfer RNA codon recognition: a modified-wobble hypothesis. Biochimie. 1991; 73:1345–1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Takai K., Yokoyama S.. Roles of 5-substituents of tRNA wobble uridines in the recognition of purine-ending codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31:6383–6391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Armengod M.E., Meseguer S., Villarroya M., Prado S., Moukadiri I., Ruiz-Partida R., Garzón M.J., Navarro-González C., Martínez-Zamora A.. Modification of the wobble uridine in bacterial and mitochondrial tRNAs reading NNA/NNG triplets of 2-codon boxes. RNA Biol. 2014; 11:1495–1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Murao K., Ishikura H., Albani M., Kersten H.. On the biosynthesis of 5-methoxyuridine and uridine-5-oxyacetic acid in specific procaryotic transfer rnas. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978; 5:1273–1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sakai Y., Kimura S., Suzuki T.. Dual pathways of tRNA hydroxylation ensure efficient translation by expanding decoding capability. Nat. Commun. 2019; 10:2858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ryu H., Grove T.L., Almo S.C., Kim J.. Identification of a novel tRNA wobble uridine modifying activity in the biosynthesis of 5-methoxyuridine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46:9160–9169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kim J., Xiao H., Bonanno J.B., Kalyanaraman C., Brown S., Tang X., Al-Obaidi N.F., Patskovsky Y., Babbitt P.C., Jacobson M.P.et al.. Structure-guided discovery of the metabolite carboxy-SAM that modulates tRNA function. Nature. 2013; 498:123–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kim J., Xiao H., Koh J., Wang Y., Bonanno J.B., Thomas K., Babbitt P.C., Brown S., Lee Y.S., Almo S.C.. Determinants of the CmoB carboxymethyl transferase utilized for selective tRNA wobble modification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43:4602–4613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sakai Y., Miyauchi K., Kimura S., Suzuki T.. Biogenesis and growth phase-dependent alteration of 5-methoxycarbonylmethoxyuridine in tRNA anticodons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44:509–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. García-Nafría J., Watson J.F., Greger I.H.. IVA cloning: a single-tube universal cloning system exploiting bacterial In Vivo assembly. Sci. Rep. 2016; 6:27459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kabsch W XDS. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010; D66:125–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Evans P.R., Murshudov G.N.. How good are my data and what is the resolution. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2013; 69:1204–1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Vagin A., Teplyakov A.. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol. 2009; 66:22–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bond P.S., Wilson K.S., Cowtan K.D.. Next generation software for placing atoms into electron density maps. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol. 2021; 76:713–723. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Emsley P., Lohkamp B., Scott W.G., Cowtan K.. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010; 66:486–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Joosten R.P., Salzemann J., Bloch V., Stockinger H., Berglund A.C., Blanchet C., Bongcam-Rudloff E., Combet C., Da Costa A.L., Deleage G.et al.. PDB_REDO: automated re-refinement of X-ray structure models in the PDB. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009; 42:376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Murshudov G.N., Skubák P., Lebedev A.A., Pannu N.S., Steiner R.A., Nicholls R.A., Winn M.D., Long F., Vagin A.A.. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2011; 67:355–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Afonine P.V., Poon B.K., Read R.J., Sobolev O.V., Terwilliger T.C., Urzhumtsev A., Adams P.D.. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol. 2018; 74:531–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Pluskal T., Castillo S., Villar-Briones A., Orešič M.. MZmine 2: modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinf. 2010; 11:395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Krissinel E., Henrick K.. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline State. J. Mol. Biol. 2007; 372:774–797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chouhan B.P.S., Maimaiti S., Gade M., Laurino P.. Rossmann-Fold methyltransferases: taking a ‘β-turn’ around their cofactor, S-adenosylmethionine. Biochemistry. 2019; 58:166–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sun Q., Huang M., Wei Y.. Diversity of the reaction mechanisms of SAM-dependent enzymes. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2021; 11:632–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Holm L. Dali server: structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50:W210–W215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Stanley R.E., Blaha G., Grodzicki R.L., Strickler M.D., Steitz T.A.. The structures of the anti-tuberculosis antibiotics viomycin and capreomycin bound to the 70S ribosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010; 17:289–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Dunham C.M., Selmer M., Phelps S.S., Kelley A.C., Suzuki T., Joseph S., Ramakrishnan V.. Structures of tRNAs with an expanded anticodon loop in the decoding center of the 30S ribosomal subunit. RNA. 2007; 13:817–823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Nakanishi K., Ogiso Y., Nakama T., Fukai S., Nureki O.. Structural basis for anticodon recognition by methionyl-tRNA synthetase. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005; 12:931–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Auffinger P., Westhof E.. An extended structural signature for the tRNA anticodon loop. RNA. 2001; 7:334–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Sprinzl M., Horn C., Brown M., Loudovltch A., Steinberg S.. Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26:148–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Jühling F., Mörl M., Hartmann R.K., Sprinzl M., Stadler P.F., Pütz J.. tRNAdb 2009: compilation of tRNA sequences and tRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37:D159–D162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kim Y., Kowiatek B., Opron K., Burton Z.F.. Type-II tRNAs and evolution of translation systems and the genetic code. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018; 19:3275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Asahara H., Himeno H., Tamura K., Nameki N., Hasegawa T., Shimizu M.. Escherichia coli seryl-tRNA synthetase recognizes tRNASer by its characteristic tertiary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 236:738–748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Itoh Y., Sekine S.I., Suetsugu S., Yokoyama S.. Tertiary structure of bacterial selenocysteine tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41:6729–6738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

gkad668_Supplemental_File

Data Availability Statement

The atomic coordinates and structure factors for E. coli CmoM-tRNASer1(cmo5UGA)-sinefungin are deposited to Protein Data Bank (PDB) under accession code 8JOZ.


Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES