Abstract
Life emerges from a network of biomolecules and chemical reactions catalyzed by enzymes. As enzyme abnormalities are often connected to various diseases, a chemical catalyst promoting physiologically important intracellular reactions in place of malfunctional endogenous enzymes would have great utility in understanding and treating diseases. However, research into such small-molecule chemical enzyme surrogates remains limited, due to difficulties in developing a reactive catalyst capable of activating inert cellular metabolites present at low concentrations. Herein, we report a small-molecule catalyst, mBnA, as a surrogate for a histone acetyltransferase. A hydroxamic acid moiety of suitable electronic characteristics at the catalytic site, paired with a thiol-thioester exchange process, enables mBnA to activate endogenous acyl-CoAs present in low concentrations and promote histone lysine acylations in living cells without the addition of exogenous acyl donors. An enzyme surrogate utilizing cellular metabolites will be a unique tool for elucidation of and synthetic intervention in the chemistry of life and disease.
Subject terms: Chemical modification, Acetylation
Chemical catalysts that can promote physiologically important post-translational modifications acting as enzyme surrogates have not been reported. Here, the authors develop mBnA, a chemical catalyst that promotes histone lysine acylation in live cells by activating endogenous acyl-CoAs as the only acyl donors.
Introduction
Proper regulation of the chemical networks in life that determine the activity, localization, turnover, and interactions of biomolecules is key to maintaining homeostasis1. For example, acetylation of histone protein lysine residues is one of the most important protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) and it plays a pivotal role in epigenetic gene regulation by inducing structural changes in chromatin or recruiting reader proteins2,3. Dysregulation of epigenetic PTMs leads to disease4,5. Therefore, a method for intervening in the chemical network of epigenetic regulation has potential as both a therapy and as a way to elucidate functions of the epigenome.
Most of the epigenetic histone PTMs in cells are introduced by enzymes catalytically activating inert cellular metabolites as reagents. For example, histone acetyltransferases (HATs) promote acetylation of histone lysine residues using the endogenous thioester acetyl reagent acetyl-CoA (Ac-CoA) and regulate the histone acetylation level in coordination with histone deacetylases (HDACs). A traditional approach to intervening in the epigenetic chemical network is to use small molecule inhibitors6,7, activators8,9, or recruiters10,11 of enzymes to modulate the catalytic activity or the target-gene selectivity of the enzymes (Fig. 1a). This approach relies on functional endogenous enzymes. Therefore, if the HATs are genetically defective, for example, HDAC inhibitors cannot enhance acetylation levels12. Furthermore, methods using these molecules are vulnerable to the organism acquiring resistance13,14.
We previously developed the chemical catalyst DSH to promote epigenetic histone lysine acetylation in living cells without reliance on enzymes15,16. DSH can use Ac-CoA as an acetyl source for lysine acetylation in test tubes. However, in-cell histone acetylation by DSH using endogenous Ac-CoA did not proceed, and the addition of a cell-permeable exogenous acetyl donor (NAC-Ac) in concentrations of 10 mM and greater was necessary for high-yielding histone acetylation (Fig. 1b). This suggested it would be difficult to chemically activate endogenous Ac-CoA, due to its low, micromolar-range concentration17,18. Currently, there is no chemical catalyst that can promote physiologically important PTMs such as histone acetylation by filling the role of an enzyme and using solely cellular metabolites as reagents, despite the fact that such chemical catalysts would be useful for elucidating, modifying, and repairing dysregulated epigenetic reaction networks in cells.
Here we report mBnA, the chemical catalyst to promote epigenetically important histone lysine acylation in live cells by activating endogenous acyl-CoAs as the only acyl donors. The catalyst serves as both a chemical probe capable of detecting changes in nuclear-cytosolic acyl-CoA levels and may spur to the development of a small-molecule surrogate for HAT enzymes enabling synthetic intervention in the cellular epigenome (Fig. 1c).
Results
Catalyst design for activating low-concentration Ac-CoA
To enable the use of endogenous Ac-CoA, we began the development of an acylation catalyst based on the reaction mechanism of DSH. DSH promoted the acetyl transfer reaction from thioester acetyl donors, including Ac-CoA, to a histone lysine residue through three main steps (Fig. 2a): (1) thiol-thioester exchange, (2) acetyl pyridinium formation via S-to-N acetyl migration, and (3) the subsequent acetyl transfer from N-acetyl pyridinium to a target lysine residue16. Kinetic studies revealed that the thiol-thioester exchange (1) was faster than steps (2) and (3)19. Assuming that this kinetic balance is the same under the conditions of low-concentration Ac-CoA, catalysts with facilitated S-to-X acetyl migration (and subsequent X-to-lysine N acetyl transfer) could promote the reaction irrespective of the concentration of Ac-CoA in the medium. DMAP, the nucleophilic core of DSH, is basic and thus is mostly deactivated by protonation under physiological conditions (i.e., neutral aqueous conditions)20. We previously reported that the piperidine-conjugated hydroxamic acid Ph-HXA (Supplementary Fig. 1a) is deprotonated under physiological conditions and serves as a nucleophilic catalyst superior to DMAP21,22. Furthermore, the acylation-active intermediate for Ph-HXA is electronically neutral, whereas the active intermediate for DSH is a cationic N-acyl pyridinium, the hydrolytic decomposition of which is expected to be non-negligible, especially when concentrations of acyl donors and acylation-active species are low. Based on these considerations, we designed a chemical catalyst, pHXA (Fig. 2b), which contains a hydroxamic acid moiety as a nucleophilic center to form a putative active O-acetylated hydroxamate species, and a thiol group as a handle to capture an acetyl group from Ac-CoA to form an S-acetylated intermediate (Supplementary Fig. 1b).
Structural optimization of histone acetylation catalysts
The histone acetylation capabilities of pHXA catalysts were tested in test tubes. To enable the catalyst to target histone proteins, we used the LANA (latency-associated nuclear antigen of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus) peptide-inserted eDHFR (LieD) system23. In this system, the LieD protein binds with a catalyst-trimethoprim (TMP) conjugate and delivers the catalyst to the acidic patch of the nucleosome, promoting acetylation of the proximal histone lysine residue H2BK120 (Supplementary Fig. 2). pHXA-TMP conjugate 1 (the thiol group is masked as a disulfide, which is cleaved in-situ under reducing conditions24, Fig. 3a), purified LieD protein, and Ac-CoA were incubated with recombinant nucleosome in a test tube, and then acetylation of H2BK120 was analyzed by both western blot using an anti-H2BK120ac antibody and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) (Fig. 3b). The results indicate pHXA 1 was able to promote H2BK120 acetylation using Ac-CoA, but only in low yield (11%). The low histone acetylation activity of pHXA 1 prompted us to improve its catalytic activity through structural optimization.
We hypothesized that the low activity of the pHXA catalyst is due to moderate efficiency in generating the putative active O-acetylated species through S-to-O acetyl migration. The electron-withdrawing carbonyl group directly connected to the aromatic ring diminishes the electron density of the oxygen atom in pHXA, shifting the balance of the acetyl migration equilibrium in favor of the S-acetyl form (Fig. 2b). We therefore designed mHXA 2, which has a carbonyl group at the 3-position of the aromatic ring, and mBnA 3, which has an additional methylene group inserted between the aromatic ring and the amide carbonyl group, to reduce the acidity of the hydroxamic acid (Fig. 3a). Comparison of their histone H2BK120 acetylation activity in test tube reactions revealed that catalysts 2 and 3 are indeed more active than catalyst 1, with the highest acetylation yield by mBnA catalyst 3 (27%, Fig. 3b). Using ultraviolet-visible absorption (UV-Vis) spectroscopy, we determined the pKa values of pHXA and mBnA to be 8.3 and 8.6, respectively, supporting the hypothesis that the lower acidity of the hydroxamic acid is favorable for effective acetylation (Supplementary Fig. 3a–b).
To confirm our hypothesis that the low acidity of hydroxamic acid contributes to the improved acetylation activity by increasing the amount of the O-acetylated putative active species produced, we quantified the formation of the S- and O-acetylated intermediates from the catalysts. Catalysts 1–3 (25 μM) and Ac-CoA (5 mM) were mixed in Tris buffer (pH 7.5) in the presence of tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP, 200 μM), and the formation of the S- and O-acetylated catalysts was monitored with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 4). As a result, the S-acetylated intermediates of all catalysts were smoothly and sufficiently formed to reach the equilibrium of thiol-thioester exchange within 2 h in almost the same yields. The concentration of the putative active O-acetylated intermediate was, however, about 4 times higher in mBnA 3 (9.1% in 3 h) than in pHXA 1 (2.0% in 3 h) and mHXA 2 (2.5% in 3 h). This tendency was consistent with the activity order in the H2BK120 acetylation reaction (Fig. 3b).
Shortening the linker between TMP and the mBnA catalyst further improved the H2BK120 acetylation yield to afford the optimized catalyst mBnA-TMP(gly1) 4 (44% yield, Fig. 3a, b). Negative control catalysts, O-methylated and S-methylated derivatives of mBnA-TMP(gly1) (5, 6: Fig. 3a) did not promote H2BK120 acetylation as efficiently as 4, indicating that both the hydroxamic acid moiety and the thiol group were essential for the acetylation ability of the mBnA catalyst (18% and 11% for 5 and 6, respectively, Supplementary Fig. 5), as expected from the postulated reaction mechanism (Fig. 2b).
In-cell histone H2BK120 acetylation by mBnA catalyst
With the optimized catalyst mBnA-TMP(gly1) 4 in hand, we next investigated in-cell acetylation of histone H2BK120. The concentration of endogenous Ac-CoA in cells is reported to be around 3–50 μM17,18. mBnA-TMP 4 promoted H2BK120-selective histone acetylation in test tubes with <50 μM Ac-CoA, suggesting that 4 can activate endogenous Ac-CoA and promote histone acetylation in living cells (Supplementary Fig. 6). LieD-transfected HEK293T cells were treated with catalysts alone (100 μM) for 10 h, and then histone acetylation levels were analyzed by western blot (Fig. 4a). DSH-TMP S316, Ph-HXA-TMP S421, and YZ-TMP S525, possessing previously reported catalyst centers, (Supplementary Fig. 7) failed to promote acetylation of H2BK120 in living cells without exogenous acetyl donors (lanes 1–3 and 9). The optimized catalyst mBnA-TMP 4, however, promoted H2BK120 acetylation (2.5% yield, lane 5). The acetylation efficiency of pHXA-TMP 1 and O- and S-methylated mBnA-TMP catalysts (5, 6) were much lower than that of 4 (lanes 4–7), which is consistent with the results in test tubes (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 5). H2BK120 acetylation by mBnA-TMP 4 showed a positive correlation with both catalyst-treatment time and catalyst concentration (Supplementary Fig. 8).
The promotion of H2BK120 acetylation by mBnA-TMP 4 was suppressed by the addition of TMP as a binding competitor (lanes 5 and 8), indicating that the acetylation was due to proximity effects of the catalyst. Acetylation levels at histone lysine residues other than those proximal to the LANA binding site did not change by treatment with mBnA-TMP 4 (Supplementary Fig. 9). Furthermore, 4 promoted acetylation of H2BK120 when H2BK120ac writer enzymes p300 (KAT3B) and CBP (KAT3A)26 were knocked down with RNAi (Supplementary Fig. 10). These results indicate that the promotion of H2BK120 acetylation by the mBnA catalyst was not dependent on cellular enzymatic activity, but was caused by the chemical catalyst itself in cells.
Western blot analysis of the whole-cell extract demonstrated that mBnA-TMP-mediated acylation was histone-selective (Supplementary Fig. 11). We also conducted chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis of H2BK120ac to determine genomic loci-dependency of mBnA-TMP-mediated acetylation. As a result, treatment of the cells by mBnA-TMP 4 increased H2BK120 acetylation levels in euchromatic and heterochromatic genes almost equally (Supplementary Fig. 12), indicating that 4 is able to promote acetylation irrespective of the chromatin structure or transcriptional state.
We compared the acetylation activity of 4 with p300, which is reported to target H2BK12026 (Supplementary Fig. 13). Overexpression of p300 increased the acetylation level of H3K1827,28, while that of H2BK120 was below the detection limit. Treatment of LieD-expressed cells with 4, however, resulted in an obvious enhancement of H2BK120 acetylation. This result highlights the superiority of chemical catalyst 4 over HAT enzymes in H2BK120 acetylation.
Evidence of utilization of endogenous Ac-CoA by mBnA
To confirm that mBnA used endogenous Ac-CoA as the acetyl source in the in-cell H2BK120 acetylation reaction, we carried out metabolic isotopic labeling of Ac-CoA with 13C-labeled glucose29. [U-13C]-glucose, which is metabolically converted into Ac-CoA with two isotopically labeled carbons in the acetyl group (Supplementary Fig. 14), was added to cell medium not containing glucose. First, LieD-transfected HEK293T cells were treated with [U-13C]-glucose (4.5 g/L) for 16 h. The cells were then treated with mBnA-TMP 4 for 10 h, histones were purified and digested with trypsin and Glu-C peptidases, and an expected two-Dalton mass shift at H2BK120ac was detected by LC–MS/MS analysis (Fig. 4b, c). In the mass traces shown in Fig. 4c, “All Pr” denotes a non-acetylated histone peptide containing H2BK120 (note: the unreacted free lysines are propionylated in preparation for LC–MS/MS analysis: see Methods section), while “K120ac” denotes a peptide acetylated at H2BK120. Control samples with no glucose-labeling provide the baseline isotopic distribution for the histone peptide, and All Pr and K120ac showed the same isotopic distribution (Fig. 4c, upper panel). When [U-13C]-glucose was used, the All Pr peptide showed a slight heavy shift of the isotopic distribution because some of the proteinogenic amino acids are biosynthesized from the [U-13C]-glucose and 13C were incorporated into the peptide backbone30 (Fig. 4c, lower panel). Compared to this All Pr peptide, the K120ac peptide showed a significant two-Dalton mass shift of the isotopic distribution with [U-13C]-glucose addition. Additionally, tandem mass spectrometry analysis showed that the two-Dalton mass shifts occurred specifically in the MS/MS fragment containing the acetyl group at K120 (Fig. 4d). These results indicate that the endogenous acetyl donor which mBnA used in the H2BK120 acetylation was Ac-CoA.
Activation of endogenous malonyl-CoA to acylate histone
Cells contain various non-acetyl acyl-CoAs and HAT enzymes introduce various histone lysine acylation with these acyl-CoAs. However, HAT is thought to be incapable of introducing some types of acyl groups, and malonylation is one such example. Enzymatic histone malonylation has not yet been identified even though histone malonylation occurs in living cells31–34. Therefore, we examined whether mBnA could activate malonyl-CoA (Ma-CoA) to promote histone malonylation in living cells, a reaction HAT cannot catalyze. LieD-transfected HEK293T cells were treated with mBnA-TMP 4 for 10 h, and the histones purified from these cells were analyzed by western blot using an anti-malonyl lysine antibody. The malonylation level of histone H2B was increased in the cells treated with mBnA-TMP 4 (lane 1 vs. 3, Fig. 5a, b). The malonylation level of H4, which is the major endogenous malonylation target, was not affected by the mBnA-TMP 4 treatment, suggesting that the mBnA catalyst promoted the H2B malonylation not by stimulating the endogenous malonylation mechanisms, but through its own catalytic activity. Intracellular concentrations of acyl-CoAs are known to increase by treatment with the corresponding sodium carboxylates (Fig. 5a)31,32. Treatment with both disodium malonate (20 mM) and mBnA-TMP 4 further promoted the malonylation, demonstrating that the mBnA catalyst has the ability to activate non-acetyl, endogenous acyl-CoA to acylate histone lysine residues.
Probing nuclear-cytosolic acyl-CoA concentrations by mBnA
Lastly, we investigated utilizing mBnA-TMP 4 to analyze subcellular acyl-CoA levels in living cells. Histone malonylation promoted by 4 was enhanced by the addition of disodium malonate, a metabolic precursor of Ma-CoA, indicating that yield of 4-mediated histone acylation is acyl-CoA concentration-dependent (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 11, and Supplementary Fig. 15a). This was also confirmed in test-tube reactions using variable concentrations of Ac-CoA and Ma-CoA (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. 15b). In living cells, the acyl-CoAs available to the catalyst for histone acylation are present in the nucleus and any cytosol in contact with it through nuclear pores (i.e., in the nuclear-cytosolic compartment), and the effect of mitochondrial acyl-CoAs can be excluded.
Generally, the global histone acylation level is considered to be simply correlated to the concentration of cellular acyl-CoA. In some cases, however, histone acylation levels are not coupled to the whole-cell concentration of acyl-CoA35,36. Subcellular compartment-specific production and consumption of acyl-CoA may cause this gap, but these are still not fully understood due to the difficulty of fractionating subcellular compartments37–39. Because detectable H2BK120 acetylation and malonylation were catalyzed solely by catalyst 4, not by endogenous enzymes, we envisioned 4-mediated H2BK120 acylation as a way to probe acyl-CoA levels in the nuclear-cytosolic compartment in response to extracellular nutrient stimuli.
We investigated the effects of glucose concentration in culture media on nuclear-cytosolic acyl-CoA levels. Glucose is the major metabolic precursor of Ac-CoA, which is further converted to Ma-CoA in the fatty acid synthesis pathway (Fig. 6a). LieD-transfected HEK293T cells pre-cultured in a 1 g/L glucose-containing medium were incubated with 1 g/L or 4.5 g/L glucose for 24 h. After reaction with mBnA-TMP 4 for 10 h, histone acylations were analyzed by western blot (Fig. 6b). Consistent with previous reports35,36, enzymatic acetylation at H3K9 and H3K18 increased under the higher glucose concentration, which produced a higher whole-cell Ac-CoA concentration40. In contrast, 4-mediated H2BK120 acetylation decreased. This result indicates that the Ac-CoA concentration of the nuclear-cytosolic compartment decreased under high glucose conditions. On the other hand, H2BK120 malonylation increased at the higher glucose concentration, indicating that nuclear-cytosolic Ma-CoA concentration increased under the same conditions.
Distinct metabolic precursors of Ac-CoA induce variable histone acetylation41. We, therefore, next utilized catalyst 4 as a probe for assessing nuclear-cytosolic Ac-CoA/Ma-CoA levels upon the addition of various sodium carboxylates as their metabolic precursors (Fig. 6a, c). The addition of sodium acetate (NaAc) increased the H2BK120ac level, indicating that the nuclear-cytosolic Ac-CoA concentration increased. This response is in contrast to the response to the addition of glucose (Fig. 6b). Disodium malonate (NaMa) significantly increased both H2BK120ac and histone malonylation levels, indicating increases in nuclear-cytosolic Ac-CoA and Ma-CoA concentrations. However, NaMa only minimally affected the enzymatic histone acetylation levels at H3K9 and H3K18. Disodium succinate (NaSucc) and trisodium citrate (NaCit), known as intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, decreased H2BK120ac and histone malonylation levels, indicating decreases in the nuclear-cytosolic Ac-CoA and Ma-CoA concentrations, without affecting enzymatic histone acetylation. Sodium butyrate (NaBu), which is simultaneously a precursor in mitochondrial Ac-CoA production and an HDAC inhibitor, potently enhanced endogenous histone acetylation, while H2BK120ac and histone malonylation, and by extension nuclear-cytosolic Ac-CoA and Ma-CoA, were significantly decreased. These results suggest that concentrations of cellular acyl-CoAs and enzymatic histone acylation are not linearly correlated. Taken together, our work demonstrated that chemical catalyst 4 is a unique tool capable of evaluating changes in the concentration of nuclear-cytosolic acyl-CoAs in response to stimuli affecting acyl-CoA metabolism.
Discussion
We developed the lysine acylation catalyst mBnA, which can acylate histone proteins solely with endogenous acyl-CoAs. A thiol group as an acyl-CoA-capturing motif, the hydroxamic acid as a nucleophilic catalyst core, and the suitable electronic density/acidity of the hydroxamic acid are all key to this success. To achieve lysine acylation with low concentrations of acyl-CoAs in cells, facile generation of the active acyl species (i.e., acyl hydroxamate), its sufficient reactivity with lysine residues, and its in-cell stability circumventing non-productive pathways (e.g., hydrolysis and reactions with glutathione) must be all satisfied concurrently. The superior nucleophilicity of the hydroxamate anion is hypothesized to contribute to the facile generation of the acyl hydroxamate, and the suitable acidity of the hydroxamic acid in the mBnA catalyst is hypothesized to contribute to the good balance of the reactivity and stability of the acyl hydroxamate. Detailed mechanism studies illuminating structure-activity relationships of the catalysts are now underway.
Previous studies revealed that thiophenol derivatives are capable of using endogenous Ac-CoA to promote lysine acetylation of proteins in cells25,42. The substrate proteins are, however, not those endogenously acetylated and thus the in-cell acetylation was not relevant to physiological processes. Furthermore, the acetylation ability largely depends on the local amino acid environment of the substrates (e.g., acetyl transfer from proximal cysteine to lysine42 or intrinsic high reactivity25). Lysine residues undergoing physiological PTM regulations are often less reactive to avoid background noise43. We confirmed that the 2-mercaptophenylacetic acid-derived catalyst (YZ-TMP, S5) was not able to promote histone acetylation (Fig. 4a), probably due to the low nucleophilicity of histone H2BK120 compared to that of its reported acetylation target, androgen receptor (AR) K720 (Supplementary Fig. 16a–b). mBnA catalyst is an unique example of a chemical catalyst promoting physiologically important protein acylation solely with endogenous Ac-CoA in live cells.
Chemical histone acetylation using solely endogenous Ac-CoA without the addition of exogenous acetyl reagents is favorable for synthetic manipulation of the cellular epigenome. By doing away with the need for exogenous acetyl reagents, undesirable perturbations to cells, as seen in examples where some types of thioesters (and thiols formed after hydrolysis) work as histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors44,45, can be minimized. Furthermore, the utilization of endogenous Ac-CoA, which is metabolically replenished in cells, could potentially regulate acetylation levels in a sustained manner. In terms of future in vivo applications, the promotion of histone acetylation reactions using endogenous metabolite Ac-CoA is desirable, as it might be difficult to accumulate sufficient concentrations of both the catalyst and exogenous donors at the target site simultaneously.
mBnA catalyst was also able to activate the non-acetyl acyl-CoA, Ma-CoA, to transfer its malonyl group to a histone lysine residue. Since there is no HAT identified to promote lysine malonylation, it is difficult to regulate histone malonylation with methods relying on enzymes, despite malonylation’s profound effects on nucleosome structures/interactions16,46,47. The ability of mBnA catalyst to promote malonyl transfer from Ma-CoA indicates that this chemical surrogate for HATs could not only replace but also complement the functions of HATs. It was recently reported that carboxylic acids from foods and drugs are metabolized to form non-canonical acyl-CoAs in body, and the acyl groups are enzymatically or non-enzymatically incorporated into histone lysine residues where they may induce transcriptional perturbations48,49. The ability of mBnA to acylate histones in an acyl-CoA concentration-dependent manner could be potentially valuable in studying and intervening in the effects of exogenous carboxylic acids and the resulting non-canonical protein lysine acylations in cells, including those HATs cannot promote.
We demonstrated that mBnA-TMP 4 can probe nuclear-cytosolic Ac-CoA and Ma-CoA levels without technically cumbersome and metabolically disruptive subcellular fractionation and mass spectrometry-based analysis37,39,50. This was possible due to the following three characteristics of our chemical catalyst-based intervention: (1) yield of acylation at H2BK120 promoted by 4 was tunable depending on the concentration of Ac-CoA or Ma-CoA, (2) 4 promoted H2BK120 acetylation and malonylation solely with endogenous acyl-CoA in the nuclear-cytosolic compartment, and (3) H2BK120 acetylation and malonylation are enzyme-independent. Cellular acyl-CoA metabolism is a complex interaction of multiple and varied factors that resists elucidation; using 4 to probe subcellular acyl-CoA levels has allowed us to begin teasing apart and understanding the different processes involved. The result that the level of 4-mediated acetylation decreased under elevated glucose conditions is especially intriguing, as it was previously reported that the amount of Ac-CoA at the whole-cell level increased under high-glucose conditions40 (Fig. 6b). This result suggests that changes in nuclear-cytosolic acyl-CoA concentrations are independent of mitochondrial acyl-CoA concentrations. Under glucose-rich conditions, glucose-derived Ac-CoA generated in mitochondria is actively transported to the nuclear-cytosolic compartment in the form of citrate, which is then utilized for histone acetylation by HATs and for Ma-CoA production to store excess carbohydrates as fatty acids51 (Fig. 6a). The increase in enzymatic acetylation at the histone tail region and Ma-CoA production would consume Ac-CoA, resulting in a decrease in nuclear-cytosolic Ac-CoA. In contrast, sodium acetate is directly converted to Ac-CoA by the nuclear-cytosolic isoform of acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 (ACSS2)52, circumventing deficiency (Fig. 6c). Similarly, disodium malonate is directly converted to Ma-CoA and then to Ac-CoA in cytosol31,53, leading to an increase in nuclear-cytosolic Ac-CoA and Ma-CoA levels. The addition of excess amounts of the TCA cycle intermediates succinate and citrate resulted in the decline of both Ac-CoA and Ma-CoA levels, though citrate can be converted to cytosolic Ac-CoA by the cytosolic enzyme ATP-citrate lyase (ACLY). However, stimulation of the TCA cycle by the addition of citrate could increase the requirement for Ac-CoA, leading to a decrease in Ac-CoA and Ma-CoA levels. An HDAC inhibitor, sodium butylate, induced a significant decrease in both Ac-CoA and Ma-CoA levels. This was likely due to inhibition of HDAC- and ACSS2-driven acetyl group recycling for Ac-CoA regeneration54. More importantly, our results revealed that enzymatic histone acetylation levels and nuclear-cytosolic Ac-CoA levels often do not correlate to each other, as shown in the outcomes following addition of glucose or sodium butylate. This observation suggests the possibility that histone acetylation is mainly regulated by the activity of HATs and HDACs, rather than Ac-CoA concentration. This hypothesis is consistent with previous reports suggesting HAT activity (e.g., autoacetylation to enhance substrate affinity, induction of nuclear localization, and improved stability55–58) has a profound impact on the regulation of histone acetylation levels35,36. Further investigations will provide more insight into the compartmentalized nature of the metabolism of acyl-CoAs and its influence on the various histone acylations.
The current acylation target of mBnA-TMP 4, H2BK120, has potential for the chemical manipulation of the cellular epigenome. We previously reported that H2BK120 acetylation that was chemically introduced using an exogenous acetyl donor has therapeutic potential in MLL-rearranged leukemia, by blocking the downstream histone ubiquitination required for the cancer progression15. It was also demonstrated that acetylation and malonylation of H2BK120 attenuate internucleosomal interactions16, suggesting that those modifications might affect higher-order chromatin structures. Nonetheless, catalysts capable of targeting other histone lysine residues, such as those in histone tail domains, are also appealing. Additionally, unlike the LieD system used in this report (which requires overexpression of an exogenous protein), direct targeting of endogenous nucleosomes in the native cellular environment is ideal. Replacing the TMP motif of 4 with other nucleosome-targeting motifs, such as octaarginine and pyrrole-imidazole-polyamide16,47,59, is one approach to developing such a catalyst. Gene-selective histone acylation, achieved by delivering the catalyst to specific gene loci, is also important for the future realization of transcriptional regulation by HAT-surrogate catalysts.
In summary, we have developed a lysine acylation catalyst, mBnA, which serves as a surrogate for endogenous histone acetyltransferases by promoting acyl group transfer from cellular acyl-CoAs to histone protein lysine residues. This is a step forward in the development of a small-molecule chemical catalyst with functionality equal to or greater than endogenous enzymes, capable of intervening in the cellular chemical network.
Methods
Preparation of the recombinant proteins
The nucleosomes were reconstituted by the salt dialysis method using the human histone octamer and 601 nucleosome-positioning sequence DNA, and were purified as described previously47,60. Recombinant LieD protein was obtained as described previously23. Recombinant AR protein (551–919) was purchased from abcam (ab235857).
Antibodies
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against H2B (abcam, ab1790, 1:2000 dilution for WB), H3K9ac (Merck, 07-352, 1:1000 dilution for WB), H3K18ac (abcam, ab1181, 1:1000 dilution for WB), and pan-Kma (PTM-Biolabs, PTM-901, 1:1000 dilution for WB), a rabbit monoclonal antibody against p300 (Cell Signaling Technology, 54062, 1:1000 dilution for WB), and mouse monoclonal antibodies against H2BK120ac (1 μg/mL for WB) and H3K27ac (Merck, 05-1334, 1:1000 dilution for WB) were used for western blot and ChIP assay. The monoclonal antibody against H2BK120ac was generated as described previously15. Secondary antibodies, anti-rabbit HRP (Cell Signaling Technology, 7074S, 1:5000 for WB) and anti-mouse HRP (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, NA931V, 1:10000 for WB or Jackson ImmunoResearch, 515-035-003, 1:10000 for WB) were also used for western blot. Normal rabbit IgG (SantaCruz, sc-2027) and Normal mouse IgG (SantaCruz, sc-2025) were also used for ChIP assay. The amounts of antibodies used for ChIP assay were indicated in Supplementary Methods section.
General method for protein digestion for LC–MS/MS analysis
The propionylated protein samples were resuspended in 50 mM NH4HCO3 aq. with 0.1% ProteaseMAX (Promega, V2072) and digested by the digestive enzymes indicated in Supplementary Table 1–2, 10 ng/μL Trypsin Gold (Promega, V5280) with or without 10 ng/μL Glu-C (Promega, V1651) or 2 ng/μL Asp-N in 50 mM NH4HCO3 aq. with 0.02% ProteaseMAX at 37 °C for 3 h or overnight. Then 5% aqueous formic acid (vol/vol) was added, and the solvents were removed by Speed-Vac evaporator to obtain dried, digested samples, which were dissolved in 0.1% aqueous formic acid (vol/vol). After centrifugation (21,130 g, 10 min), the supernatant was used for LC–MS/MS analysis.
LC–MS/MS analysis
LC–MS/MS analysis was carried out using a TripleTOF 5600+ instrument equipped with eksigent M5 microLC (AB Sciex). LC was carried out as follows: 3C18-CL-120 column (0.5 mm ID × 100 mm) using 2% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid for 1 min, followed by a linear gradient of 2-35% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid over 6 min, and then a linear gradient of 35-90% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid over 1 min at 40 °C with a flow rate of 20 μL/min. The volume of injected samples was 5 μL. The eluent was monitored by on-line quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ESI-Q-TOF MS), operated in positive ion mode. The targeted precursor ions and fragment ions, and collision energy for each peptide are shown in Supplementary Table 1–2. Data analysis was carried out using PeakView version 1.2 (AB Sciex) and the averaged result or the representative result obtained from duplicate measurements of each two different experiments is reported as the result for quantification of acylation yields or detection of isotope labeling respectively. The yield of acylated lysine was calculated from the extracted ion chromatogram as a percentage of the peak area for acylated peptides divided by the combined peak areas for both acylated and propionylated peptides. The MS and MS/MS spectrum chart was obtained as an impulse plot of peak heights.
Histone acylation in test tube
A catalyst-TMP (5 μM) was mixed with TCEP (200 μM) in Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl) and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 5 min before recombinant nucleosomes (0.35 μM), recombinant LieD proteins (2 μM), and the indicated concentration of Ac-CoA or Ma-CoA (1 mM unless otherwise stated) were added to the solution. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 5 h (or 10 h in the experiment for Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. 15a). For immunoblotting, the reaction mixture was boiled with SDS sample buffer and analyzed by CBB staining and western blot using the anti-H2BK120ac or pan-Kma antibody. Representative data of two independent experiments are shown. For LC–MS/MS analysis, proteins in the reaction mixture were precipitated by trichloroacetic acid (TCA, 16.6%). The protein was collected by centrifugation, air-dried, and dissolved in Milli-Q water (MQ). After DNA was digested by DNase I (Takara, 2270 A) for 30 min at 37 °C, the samples were mixed with acetone (74%) and incubated overnight at −30 °C, then the proteins were collected by centrifugation, air-dried, and dissolved in MQ. To the solution, 50 mM aqueous ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3 aq.) and 25% propionic anhydride solution (methanol/propionic anhydride, 3:1 (vol/vol)) were added, and pH was adjusted to 8 by adding ammonia solution. After 1 h incubation at r.t., the solvents were removed by Speed-Vac evaporator. The propionylated proteins were treated as described in “General method for protein digestion for LC–MS/MS analysis” section.
HPLC analysis for the formation of the S- and O-acetylated intermediates of the catalysts
A catalyst-TMP conjugate (25 μM) was mixed with TCEP (200 μM) in Tris buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl), and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 5 min before Ac-CoA (5 mM) was added to the solution. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for the indicated time. At each time point, the reaction was stopped by adding 0.5% TFA aqueous solution (final 0.4%), and was analyzed with HPLC and LC/MS. The yields of the S- and O-acetylated intermediates were calculated according to the equation below. Since N-O bond of hydroxamic acids was possibly reduced with TCEP, peak area of “SH” was calculated as the sum of hydroxamic acid-SH and reduced amide-SH. The same calculation method was applied to “SAc”.
1 |
2 |
General methods for in-cell experiments
HEK293T cells (kindly provided by the Toru Hirota laboratory) were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. DMEM++ refers to Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Gibco, 11965092) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and GlutaMAX. DMEM+++ refers to DMEM++ supplemented with penicillin and streptomycin unless otherwise stated. CRB buffer refers to 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 0.3% Triton X-100. CRB++++ buffer refers to CRB buffer supplemented with MgCl2 (2 mM), PMSF (1 mM), protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Ardrich, P2714-1BTL), and benzonase nuclease (Novagen, 0.1 U/mL). CRB+++++ buffer refers to CRB ++++ buffer supplemented with sodium butylate (5 mM).
In-cell acetylation of histones using endogenous Ac-CoA
In all, 2.8 × 105 HEK293T cells in 1 mL DMEM++ were seeded into wells of a 12-well plate. After 24 h incubation, the cells were transfected with pcDNA5/TO-LieD@R52-FLAG plasmid (1.25 μg per well; plasmid constructed as reported previously23) using Lipofectamine LTX and Plus reagents according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 8 h, the medium was carefully removed and replaced with 1 mL DMEM+++ supplemented with BSO (100 μM). After 16 h, the medium was carefully removed and replaced with 0.4 mL Opti-MEM (Gibco, 31985070) supplemented with catalyst-TMP (100 μM unless otherwise stated), BSO (100 μM), and 0.5% DMSO. After 10 h (or the indicated time), the cells were detached by pipetting vigorously, transferred to an Eppendorf tube, centrifuged (304 g, 5 min, 4 °C), and washed with PBS. In all, 420 μL Extraction Buffer of Histone Purification Kit (Active Motif) were added to cells and then the mixture was incubated with agitation overnight at 4 °C. After centrifugation (21,130×g, 10 min), the supernatant was collected. For immunoblotting, the histones were precipitated by TCA (25%). The proteins were collected by centrifugation, washed by acetone, air-dried, and dissolved in MQ. Collected proteins were boiled with SDS sample buffer and analyzed by western blot using the indicated antibodies. The samples derived from the same experiment and the gels/blots were processed in parallel. Representative data of two independent experiments are shown. For LC–MS/MS analysis, histone H2A/H2B and H3/H4 subunits were isolated separately with the Histone Purification Kit (Active Motif) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, the H2A/H2B and H3/H4 fractions were isolated from the acid-extracted histone solution by subsequent elution. The histone subunits in each fraction were precipitated with perchloric acid (final 6%). The precipitates were washed with 4% perchloric acid twice, 2% HCl/acetone twice, and acetone twice, followed by air-drying. The histones were dissolved in 20 μL MQ, then 20 μL of 200 mM NH4HCO3 aq. and 40 μL of propionic anhydride solution was added, and pH was adjusted to 8 by adding ammonia solution. After 30 min incubation at r.t., the solvents were removed by Speed-Vac evaporator. The propionylated proteins were treated as described in “General method for protein digestion for LC–MS/MS analysis” section.
In-cell acetylation of histones with 13C isotopic labeling
In all, 2.8 × 105 HEK293T cells in 1 mL high glucose DMEM ++ (Gibco, 11965) were seeded into wells of a 12-well plate. After 24 h incubation, the cells were transfected with pcDNA5/TO-LieD@R52-FLAG plasmid (1.25 μg per well) using Lipofectamine LTX and Plus reagents according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 8 h, the medium was carefully removed and replaced with 1 mL high-glucose DMEM +++ supplemented with BSO (100 μM) or no-glucose DMEM +++ (Gibco, 11966) supplemented with [U-13C]-glucose (4.5 g/L) and BSO (100 μM). After 16 h, the medium was carefully removed and replaced with 0.4 mL high-glucose or no-glucose DMEM +++ supplemented with catalyst-TMP (100 μM), [U-13C]-glucose (4.5 g/L for no-glucose DMEM+++), BSO (100 μM), and 0.5% DMSO. After 10 h, the cells were detached by pipetting vigorously, transferred to an Eppendorf tube, centrifuged (304 g, 5 min, 4 °C), and washed with PBS. For LC–MS/MS analysis, histone H2A/H2B and H3/H4 subunits were isolated separately using the Histone Purification Kit (Active Motif) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The histone subunits in each fraction were dissolved in 20 μL MQ, then 20 μL of 200 mM NH4HCO3 aq. and 40 μL of propionic anhydride solution were added, and pH was adjusted to 8 by adding ammonia solution. After 30 min incubation at r.t., the solvents were removed by Speed-Vac evaporator. The propionylated proteins were treated as described in “General method for protein digestion for LC–MS/MS analysis” section.
In-cell malonylation of histones using endogenous Ma-CoA
In all, 2.8 × 105 HEK293T cells in 1 mL no-glucose DMEM ++ supplemented with glucose (1 g/L) were seeded into wells of a 12-well plate. After 24 h incubation, the cells were transfected with pcDNA5/TO-LieD@R52-FLAG plasmid (1.25 μg per well) using Lipofectamine LTX and Plus reagents according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 12 h, the medium was carefully removed and replaced with 1 mL DMEM+++ supplemented with glucose (1 g/L) and BSO (100 μM, only the experiment for Fig. 5b) with or without disodium malonate (NaMa, 20 mM unless otherwise stated). After 24 h, the medium was carefully removed and replaced with 0.4 mL no-glucose DMEM +++ supplemented with catalyst-TMP (100 μM), glucose (1 g/L), BSO (100 μM), NaMa (20 mM), and 0.5% DMSO, and the mixture was incubated for 10 h. For immunoblotting, the histones were collected from the cells as described in “In-cell acetylation of histones using endogenous Ac-CoA” section and boiled with SDS sample buffer. The proteins were analyzed by Oriole staining and western blot using the pan-Kma antibody. For immunoblotting of whole-cell extracts, the cells were lysed with CRB++++ buffer on ice for 30 min, and then treated as described in “In-cell acetylation of histone with p300/CBP siRNA treatment” section. Representative data of two independent experiments are shown.
Investigating changes in nuclear-cytosolic acyl-CoA levels through in-cell acylation of histones
In all, 2.8 × 105 HEK293T cells in 1 mL no-glucose DMEM++ supplemented with glucose (1 g/L) were seeded into wells of a 12-well plate. After 24 h incubation, the cells were transfected with pcDNA5/TO-LieD@R52-FLAG plasmid (1.25 μg per well) using Lipofectamine LTX and Plus reagents according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 12 h, the medium was carefully removed and replaced with 1 mL DMEM+++ supplemented with the indicated concentration of glucose (1 g/L unless otherwise stated) with or without the indicated sodium carboxylates (NaXXs, 10 mM). After 24 h, the medium was carefully removed and replaced with 0.4 mL no-glucose DMEM+++ supplemented with catalyst-TMP (100 μM), glucose, NaXX, and 0.5% DMSO, and the mixture was incubated for 10 h. For immunoblotting of whole-cell extracts, the cells were lysed with CRB++++ buffer on ice for 30 min, and then treated as described in “In-cell acetylation of histone with p300/CBP siRNA treatment” section. Representative data of two or three independent experiments are shown.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We thank J. Kato (Univ. Tokyo) for her assistance. We thank R. Newlon (Univ. Tokyo) for reading the manuscript and providing helpful comments. We thank JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP20H00489 (M.K.), JP23H05466 (M.K.), JP19KK0179 (S.A.K., K.Y., and M.K.), JP21K19326 (K.Y.), JP22H05018 (K.Y.), JP21H02074 (S.A.K.), JP18H05534 (H.Ku.), JP23H05475 (H.Ku.), JST ERATO grant number JPMJER1901 (H.Ku.), and SUNBOR GRANT (K.Y.) for financial support. This research was partially supported by Research Support Project for Life Science and Drug Discovery (Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (BINDS)) from AMED under Grant Number JP 22ama121009j0001 (H.Ku.).
Author contributions
S.M., S.A.K., K.Y., and M.K. conceived and designed the project. M.H., S.M., and H.Ka. performed the experiments and synthesized all chemical compounds. T.K. and H.Ku. purified the recombinant mononucleosomes. M.H., S.A.K., K.Y., and M.K. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all the other authors.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Matthias Schiedel, Qingfei Zheng and the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
All data supporting the conclusions and findings included in this study are available within the article or the Supplementary Information/Source Data file. Uncropped and unprocessed scans of all blots and gels are provided in the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Shigehiro A. Kawashima, Email: skawashima@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Kenzo Yamatsugu, Email: yamatsugu@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Motomu Kanai, Email: kanai@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-41426-z.
References
- 1.Mann M, Jensen ON. Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003;21:255–261. doi: 10.1038/nbt0303-255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gregory PD, Wagner K, Hörz W. Histone acetylation and chromatin remodeling. Exp. Cell Res. 2001;265:195–202. doi: 10.1006/excr.2001.5187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marmorstein R, Zhou M-M. Writers and readers of histone acetylation: structure, mechanism, and inhibition. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014;6:a018762–a018762. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mirabella AC, Foster BM, Bartke T. Chromatin deregulation in disease. Chromosoma. 2016;125:75–93. doi: 10.1007/s00412-015-0530-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dawson MA, Kouzarides T. Cancer epigenetics: from mechanism to therapy. Cell. 2012;150:12–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li Y, Seto E. HDACs and HDAC inhibitors in cancer development and therapy. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016;6:a026831. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hontecillas-Prieto L, et al. Synergistic enhancement of cancer therapy using HDAC inhibitors: opportunity for clinical trials. Front. Genet. 2020;11:578011. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.578011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Balasubramanyam K, Swaminathan V, Ranganathan A, Kundu TK. Small molecule modulators of histone acetyltransferase p300. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:19134–19140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301580200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Piaz FD, et al. The identification of a novel natural activator of p300 histone acetyltranferase provides new insights into the modulation mechanism of this enzyme. ChemBioChem. 2010;11:818–827. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200900721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yu Z, Pandian GN, Hidaka T, Sugiyama H. Therapeutic gene regulation using pyrrole–imidazole polyamides. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019;147:66–85. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Taniguchi J, et al. Biomimetic artificial epigenetic code for targeted acetylation of histones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:7108–7115. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b01518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pasqualucci L, et al. Inactivating mutations of acetyltransferase genes in B-cell lymphoma. Nature. 2011;471:189–196. doi: 10.1038/nature09730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dedes KJ, et al. Acquired vorinostat resistance shows partial cross-resistance to ‘second-generation’ HDAC inhibitors and correlates with loss of histone acetylation and apoptosis but not with altered HDAC and HAT activities. Anticancer Drugs. 2009;20:321–333. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283262a32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fantin VR, Richon VM. Mechanisms of resistance to histone deacetylase inhibitors and their therapeutic implications. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:7237–7242. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-2114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fujiwara Y, et al. Live-cell epigenome manipulation by synthetic histone acetylation catalyst system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2019554118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2019554118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Amamoto Y, et al. Synthetic posttranslational modifications: chemical catalyst-driven regioselective histone acylation of native chromatin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:7568–7576. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b02138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sivanand S, Viney I, Wellen KE. Spatiotemporal control of acetyl-CoA metabolism in chromatin regulation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2018;43:61–74. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu X, et al. Acetate production from glucose and coupling to mitochondrial metabolism in mammals. Cell. 2018;175:502–513. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yamatsugu K, et al. Kinetic analyses and structure-activity relationship studies of synthetic lysine acetylation catalysts. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2018;26:5359–5367. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tamura T, et al. Affinity-guided oxime chemistry for selective protein acylation in live tissue systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:14181–14191. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b07339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mizumoto S, et al. Hydroxamic acid‐piperidine conjugate is an activated catalyst for lysine acetylation under physiological conditions. Chem. Asian J. 2020;15:833–839. doi: 10.1002/asia.201901737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Adamson C, Kajino H, Kawashima SA, Yamatsugu K, Kanai M. Live-cell protein modification by boronate-assisted hydroxamic acid catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:14976–14980. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c07060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fujimura, A. et al. Chemical catalyst/protein hybrid as artificial histone-modifying enzyme for epigenome manipulation. ChemRxiv10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-xt610 (2022).
- 24.Hamajima W, et al. Site-selective synthetic acylation of a target protein in living cells promoted by a chemical catalyst/donor system. ACS Chem. Biol. 2019;14:1102–1109. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang Y, Mantravadi PK, Jobbagy S, Bao W, Koh JT. Antagonizing the androgen receptor with a biomimetic acyltransferase. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016;11:2797–2802. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gatta R, et al. An acetylation-monoubiquitination switch on Lysine 120 of H2B. Epigenetics. 2011;6:630–637. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.5.15623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jin Q, et al. Distinct roles of GCN5/PCAF-mediated H3K9ac and CBP/p300-mediated H3K18/27ac in nuclear receptor transactivation. EMBO J. 2011;30:249–262. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sabari BR, et al. Intracellular crotonyl-CoA stimulates transcription through p300-catalyzed histone crotonylation_SI. Mol. Cell. 2015;58:203–215. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Evertts AG, et al. Quantitative dynamics of the link between cellular metabolism and histone acetylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:12142–12151. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.428318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Boroughs LK, DeBerardinis RJ. Metabolic pathways promoting cancer cell survival and growth. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015;17:351–359. doi: 10.1038/ncb3124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Peng C, et al. The first identification of lysine malonylation substrates and its regulatory enzyme. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2011;10:M111.012658. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.012658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sabari BR, Zhang D, Allis CD, Zhao Y. Metabolic regulation of gene expression through histone acylations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017;18:90–101. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Faulkner S, Maksimovic I, David Y. A chemical field guide to histone nonenzymatic modifications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2021;63:180–187. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Anmangandla A, Ren Y, Fu Q, Zhang S, Lin H. The Acyl-CoA specificity of human lysine acetyltransferase KAT2A. Biochemistry. 2022;61:1874–1882. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhao S, et al. ATP-citrate lyase controls a glucose-to-acetate metabolic switch. Cell Rep. 2016;17:1037–1052. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jo C, et al. Histone acylation marks respond to metabolic perturbations and enable cellular adaptation. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020;52:2005–2019. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-00539-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wellen KE, Snyder NW. Should we consider subcellular compartmentalization of metabolites, and if so, how do we measure them? Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2019;22:1–14. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Trefely S, Lovell CD, Snyder NW, Wellen KE. Compartmentalised acyl-CoA metabolism and roles in chromatin regulation. Mol. Metab. 2020;38:100941. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Trefely S, et al. Quantitative subcellular acyl-CoA analysis reveals distinct nuclear metabolism and isoleucine-dependent histone propionylation. Mol. Cell. 2022;82:447–462. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lee JV, et al. Akt-dependent metabolic reprogramming regulates tumor cell histone acetylation. Cell Metab. 2014;20:306–319. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sebastián C, Mostoslavsky R. The various metabolic sources of histone acetylation. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2017;28:85–87. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2016.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jenkins LMM, et al. Small-molecule inactivation of HIV-1 NCp7 by repetitive intracellular acyl transfer. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010;6:887–889. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hacker SM, et al. Global profiling of lysine reactivity and ligandability in the human proteome. Nat. Chem. 2017;9:1181–1190. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Baud MGJ, et al. Thioester derivatives of the natural product psammaplin A as potent histone deacetylase inhibitors. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013;9:81–88. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.9.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Suzuki T, et al. Thiol-based SAHA analogues as potent histone deacetylase inhibitors. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2004;14:3313–3317. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.03.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hirschey MD, Zhao Y. Metabolic regulation by lysine malonylation, succinylation, and glutarylation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2015;14:2308–2315. doi: 10.1074/mcp.R114.046664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ishiguro T, et al. Synthetic chromatin acylation by an artificial catalyst system. Chem. 2017;2:840–859. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Huang H, et al. Lysine benzoylation is a histone mark regulated by SIRT2. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3374. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05567-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jiang Y, et al. Isonicotinylation is a histone mark induced by the anti-tuberculosis first-line drug isoniazid. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5548. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25867-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Trefely S, et al. Subcellular metabolic pathway kinetics are revealed by correcting for artifactual post harvest metabolism. Mol. Metab. 2019;30:61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shi L, Tu BP. Acetyl-CoA and the regulation of metabolism: mechanisms and consequences. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2015;33:125–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Luong A, Hannah VC, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Molecular characterization of human acetyl-CoA synthetase, an enzyme regulated by sterol regulatory element-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:26458–26466. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004160200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Abu-Elheiga L, et al. The subcellular localization of acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:1444–1449. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bulusu V, et al. Acetate recapturing by nuclear acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 prevents loss of histone acetylation during oxygen and serum limitation. Cell Rep. 2017;18:647–658. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Thompson PR, et al. Regulation of the p300 HAT domain via a novel activation loop. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004;11:308–315. doi: 10.1038/nsmb740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Albaugh BN, Arnold KM, Lee S, Denu JM. Autoacetylation of the histone acetyltransferase Rtt109. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:24694–24701. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.251579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Blanco-García N, Asensio-Juan E, de la Cruz X, Martínez-Balbás MA. Autoacetylation regulates P/CAF nuclear localization. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:1343–1352. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806075200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Peng L, et al. SIRT1 negatively regulates the activities, functions, and protein levels of hMOF and TIP60. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012;32:2823–2836. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00496-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kajino H, et al. Synthetic hyperacetylation of nucleosomal histones. RSC Chem. Biol. 2020;1:56–59. doi: 10.1039/d0cb00029a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kujirai T, et al. Methods for preparing nucleosomes containing histone variants. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018;1832:3–20. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8663-7_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data supporting the conclusions and findings included in this study are available within the article or the Supplementary Information/Source Data file. Uncropped and unprocessed scans of all blots and gels are provided in the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.