Abstract
One hundred and ninety-nine male London office workers with dyspeptic symptoms elicited by a self-administered questionnaire were randomly allocated to intervention and control groups to assess the potential benefits of screening. The members of the intervention group were interviewed and examined, and those men who were considered to have a possible or probable peptic ulcer received a barium meal examination (53%). At the clinical interview the intervention group were advised against both smoking and drinking alcohol. Eighteen months later both groups were recalled for interview and examination and their sickness absence in the intervening period was assessed. The intervention group did not alter their cigarette consumption but did reduce their alcohol intake by an average of 10%. The control group increased their alcohol intake by 20%. Both groups tended to improve symptomatically, and there were no differences in symptoms between the groups at the end of the study. Sickness absence was not affected by the intervention. It is concluded that screening for ulcer-type dyspepsia is not justifiable in male London office workers.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BRUMMER P., HAKKINEN I. X-ray negative dyspepsia: a follow-up study. Acta Med Scand. 1959 Dec 5;165:329–332. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1959.tb14508.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gregory D. W., Davies G. T., Evans K. T., Rhodes J. Natural history of patients with x-ray-negative dyspepsia in general practice. Br Med J. 1972 Dec 2;4(5839):519–520. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5839.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes R. B., Sackett D. L., Taylor D. W., Gibson E. S., Johnson A. L. Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 5;299(14):741–744. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810052991403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krag E. Pseudo-ulcer and true peptic ulcer. A clinical, radiographic and statistical follow-up study. Acta Med Scand. 1965 Dec;178(6):713–728. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spiro H. M. Visceral viewpoints. Moynihan's disease? The diagnosis of duodenal ulcer. N Engl J Med. 1974 Sep 12;291(11):567–569. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197409122911107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sturdevant R. A. Epidemiology of peptic ulcer: report of a conference. Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Jul;104(1):9–14. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]