Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1984 Mar;38(1):29–35. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.1.29

Fetal loss rates and their relation to pregnancy order.

E Roman
PMCID: PMC1052312  PMID: 6707560

Abstract

Much of the recent controversy surrounding the relation between fetal death and pregnancy order has centred around the appropriateness of different types of analyses. In the present paper the interpretation of various methods are discussed with reference to "real" and "hypothetical" data. The pattern of results obtained when the fetal loss rates of a group of pregnancies are tabulated by pregnancy order was found to depend on the risk and parity distributions of the study population. These two parameters did not, however, appear to affect the within "sibship" or "gravidity" group patterns. These findings support the hypothesis that the frequently observed increase in fetal death rates in pregnancy orders above two could be largely artifactual. It is concluded that in any investigation of reproductive events women, and not their pregnancies, should form the prime unit of analyses.

Full text

PDF
29

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bakketeig L. S., Hoffman H. J. Perinatal mortality by birth order within cohorts based on sibship size. Br Med J. 1979 Sep 22;2(6192):693–696. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6192.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakketeig L. S., Hoffman H. J. Pregnancy order and reproductive loss. Br Med J. 1980 Mar 8;280(6215):716–716. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6215.716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ballweg J. A. Death loss, fetal wastage and completed family size. J Biosoc Sci. 1982 Jul;14(3):309–318. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000014152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Billewicz W. Z. Some implications of self-selection for pregnancy. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1973 Feb;27(1):49–52. doi: 10.1136/jech.27.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Golding J., Butler N. R., Newcombe R. G. Analysis of completed reproductive histories: a cautionary tale. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1983 Mar;37(1):78–81. doi: 10.1136/jech.37.1.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Golding J., Vivian S., Newcombe R. G. Fetal loss, gravidity and pregnancy order: is the truncated cascade analysis valid? Early Hum Dev. 1982 Jan;6(1):71–76. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(82)90059-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. JAMES W. H. On the possibility of segregation in the propensity to spontaneous abortion in the human female. Ann Hum Genet. 1961 Dec;25:207–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1962.tb01521.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jain A. K. Fetal wastage in a sample of Taiwanese women. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1969 Jul;47(3):297–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. James W. H. Spontaneous abortion and birth order. J Biosoc Sci. 1974;6(1):23–41. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000009482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. James W. H. Stillbirth and birth order. Ann Hum Genet. 1968 Oct;32(2):151–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1968.tb00059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kline J., Shrout P. E., Stein Z. A., Susser M., Weiss M. II. An epidemiological study of the role of gravidity in spontaneous abortion. Early Hum Dev. 1978 Feb;1(4):345–356. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(78)90042-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mantel N. Perinatal mortality by birth order. Br Med J. 1979 Nov 3;2(6198):1147–1147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6198.1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pharoah P. O., Alberman E., Doyle P., Chamberlain G. Outcome of pregnancy among women in anaesthetic practice. Lancet. 1977 Jan 1;1(8001):34–36. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91666-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Resseguie L. J. Influence of age, birth order and reproductive compensation on stillbirth ratios. J Biosoc Sci. 1973 Oct;5(4):443–452. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000009342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Roman E., Doyle P., Beral V., Alberman E., Pharoah P. Fetal loss, gravidity, and pregnancy order. Early Hum Dev. 1978 Jul;2(2):131–138. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(78)90005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SHAPIRO S., JONES E. W., DENSEN P. M. A life table of pregnancy terminations and correlates of fetal loss. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1962 Jan;40:7–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. STEVENSON A. C., DUDGEON M. Y., McCLURE H. I. Observations on the results of pregnancies in women resident in Belfast. II. Abortions, hydatidiform moles and ectopic pregnancies. Ann Hum Genet. 1959 Dec;23:395–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1959.tb01482.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WARBURTON D., FRASER F. C. SPONTANEOUS ABORTION RISKS IN MAN: DATA FROM REPRODUCTIVE HISTORIES COLLECTED IN A MEDICAL GENETICS UNIT. Am J Hum Genet. 1964 Mar;16:1–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilcox A. J., Gladen B. C. Spontaneous abortion: the role of heterogeneous risk and selective fertility. Early Hum Dev. 1982 Nov;7(2):165–178. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(82)90135-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES