Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1988 Jun;42(2):116–120. doi: 10.1136/jech.42.2.116

Diagnosis of past history of myocardial infarction in epidemiological studies: an alternative based on the Caerphilly and Speedwell surveys.

J W Yarnell 1, P M Sweetnam 1, I A Baker 1, D Bainton 1
PMCID: PMC1052703  PMID: 3221160

Abstract

In epidemiological studies the diagnosis of a past history of myocardial infarction is made from the answer to a single question: "Have you ever had a severe pain across the front of your chest lasting for half an hour or more?" Two additional questions, which form an optional part of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine chest pain questionnaire, were used in two large community studies, with other information to determine the likely accuracy of the diagnosis ("Did you see a doctor about this pain?" If so, "What did he say it was?") The prevalence of possible myocardial infarction from the use of the single question was significantly higher among men from South Wales than among men from Speedwell, Bristol (10.1% and 6.9% respectively); in contrast, positive responses to the additional questions reduced the prevalence in the two populations to 5.8% and 4.9% respectively. These latter figures are very similar to those of self-reported coronary thrombosis in the two populations. Among subjects with positive responses to the additional questions the prevalence of ECG ischaemia was about 50%; in contrast, the prevalence of ECG ischaemia among those positive only to the severe chest pain question was very similar to that among those with no history of chest pain (12%). Preliminary mortality data show a similar classification of level of risk. These findings indicate that the false positive error rate for possible myocardial infarction could be significantly reduced by the use of two additional questions which form an optional part of the London School of Hygiene chest pain questionnaire but are rarely used. However, the present findings relate to populations with uniform levels of adequately accessible medical care; comparisons between populations with different levels of medical care will require cautious interpretation.

Full text

PDF
116

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bainton D., Baker I. A., Sweetnam P. M., Yarnell J. W., Elwood P. C. Prevalence of ischaemic heart disease: the Caerphilly and Speedwell surveys. Br Heart J. 1988 Feb;59(2):201–206. doi: 10.1136/hrt.59.2.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bayliss R. I. The silent coronary. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Apr 13;290(6475):1093–1094. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6475.1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rose G., Hamilton P. S., Keen H., Reid D. D., McCartney P., Jarrett R. J. Myocardial ischaemia, risk factors and death from coronary heart-disease. Lancet. 1977 Jan 15;1(8003):105–109. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91701-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES