Abstract
Microglia (MØ) morphologies are closely related to their functional state and have a central role in the maintenance of brain homeostasis. It is well known that inflammation contributes to neurodegeneration at later stages of Alzheimer’s Disease, but it is not clear which role MØ-mediated inflammation may play earlier in the disease pathogenesis. We have previously reported that diffusion MRI (dMRI) is able to detect early myelin abnormalities present in 2-month-old 3xTg-AD (TG) mice; since MØ actively participate in regulating myelination, the goal of this study was to assess quantitatively MØ morphological characteristics and its association with dMRI metrics patterns in 2-month-old 3xTg-AD mice. Our results show that, even at this young age (2-month-old), TG mice have statistically significantly more MØ cells, which are overall smaller and more complex, compared with age-matched normal control mice (NC). Our results also confirm that myelin basic protein is reduced in TG mice, particularly in fimbria (Fi) and cortex. Additionally, MØ morphological characteristics, in both groups, correlate with several dMRI metrics, depending on the brain region examined. For example, the increase in MØ number correlated with higher radial diffusivity (D⊥) (r= 0.59, p= 0.008), lower fractional anisotropy (FA) (r= −0.47, p= 0.03), and lower kurtosis fractional anisotropy (KFA) (r= −0.55, p= 0.01) in the CC. Furthermore, smaller MØ cells correlate with higher axial diffusivity (D∥) in the HV (r= 0.49, p= 0.03) and Sub (r= 0.57, p= 0.01). Our findings demonstrate, for the first time, that MØ proliferation/activation are a common and widespread feature in 2-month-old 3xTg-AD mice and suggest that dMRI measures are sensitive to these MØ alterations, which are associated in this model with myelin dysfunction and microstructural integrity abnormalities.
Keywords: Microglia, Diffusion MRI, Diffusional kurtosis imaging, 3xTg-AD mouse, White matter, Alzheimer’s disease
1. Introduction
Microglia are the immune cells of the brain and key players in brain injury and disease1,2. Their distribution, morphology, and numbers are influenced by local cytoarchitecture and vary considerably3,4. Microglial morphology consists of a distinct cell body (soma), from which elongated ramified processes are projected; however, the number, length, and complexity of branching of the processes can differ widely depending on the brain region, particularly in reactive situations2,3. While white matter microglia show elongated soma and processes preferentially oriented along fiber tracts, in gray matter microglia exhibit various elaborate radially oriented arbors3. Microglia actively adapt their cell morphology and function in response to pathological situations, in a process called “deramification”2,5. In this process, ramified microglia can transform progressively into an “activated state”, characterized by swollen ramified cells with a larger cell body and shorter, thicker processes. Alternatively, microglia can adopt a “reactive state” which are typically small, spherical cells, but may also exhibit rod-shape or amoeboid-like morphologies with high phagocytic activity.
Microglia morphologies are closely related to their functional state5 and have a central role in the maintenance of brain homeostasis under healthy conditions. In their dynamic surveilling state6, in which microglia are characterized by a ramified morphology, they scan their environment while having direct interactions with neurons, blood vessels and other glial cells, as they participate in pruning synapses, neurotransmitter signaling and synaptic transmission, regulating neuronal activity7–11. They also actively participate in myelination, both during development and homeostatic myelin maintenance12,13, through the phagocytosis of excess oligodendrocytes and myelin membrane that forms abnormally. In addition, microglia support oligodendrocyte survival and differentiation and regulate apoptosis of oligodendrocytes by secreting several trophic factors and other intercellular signaling molecules, including chemokines and cytokines12,13.
Alterations in microglial morphology and function with age and their association with neurodegeneration are well demonstrated14–16, and microglia-mediated neuroinflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)17–21. Furthermore, there are indications that microglial pathology appears earlier in mouse models of AD22, with microglial numbers significantly increasing in the subiculum of 4-month-old 5xFAD mice23. Additionally, microglia with the white matter (WM) associated gene signature (WAM), form more nodules containing myelin debris in 2-month-old 5xFAD mice24 than in control mice. Nonetheless, the role of microglia dysfunction early in the AD disease process is not well understood.
In the 3xTg-AD mouse model, which develops both amyloid-β (Aβ) and neurofibrillary tangles in a temporal and spatial pattern similar to that of human AD pathology25–27, microglia activation has been reported to be first detected at 6 months of age28,29. However, abnormal myelination patterns with changes in oligodendrocyte and myelin marker expression are the earliest pathological feature described in the 3xTg-AD mice, leading to WM disruption in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex by 2 months of age30,31. These WM changes are followed by the first signs of cognitive impairment, detected even before Aβ plaques appear32.
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is widely used as a noninvasive means of detecting changes in brain tissue microstructure associated with pathology33. Its sensitivity to microstructure stems from its ability to quantify the motion of water molecules on length scales commensurate with the size of neurons and glia33,34. In prior studies, we have found dMRI metrics to change longitudinally with aging35 and AD pathology progression36 in several brain regions, along with evidence that they are sensitive to the larger number of cholinergic neurons reported in the basal forebrain (BF) of these young 3xTg-AD mice35. Moreover, our work supports the ability of dMRI to detect the early myelin abnormalities described in 2-month-old 3xTg-AD mice37, particularly in the corpus callosum, fimbria, and fornix. Since microglia actively participates in regulating myelination13, we hypothesize that dMRI will be able to detect and correlate with abnormal microglia morphology in these young mice. Therefore, our aim in this study is to quantitatively investigate morphological characteristics of microglia and their association with dMRI metrics for selected brain regions in young 2-month-old 3xTg-AD mice, which may help inform the application of dMRI to the in vivo assessment of inflammation in AD and other neuropathologies.
2. Methods
2.1. AD mouse model
All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Medical University of South Carolina and conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The 3xTg-AD model possesses the three mutations of human presenilin-1 M146V, human amyloid precursor protein Swedish mutation, and the P301L mutation of human tau, based on human mutations identified in familial AD25,32. The 3xTg-AD (TG) [B6;129-Psen1tm1Mpm Tg(APPSwe, tauP301L)1Lfa/Mmjax; MMRRC Stock No: 34830-JAX|3xTg-AD] and age-matched controls (NC) [101045 B6129SF2/J] were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. The control mice for the 3xTg-AD are the suggested controls for genetically engineered strains generated with 129-derived embryonic stem cells and maintained on a mixed B6;129 background. Only 2-month-old female mice were used in this study since the development of AD pathology is far less pronounced and more variable in male 3xTg-AD mice38,39. All mice were housed in temperature- and humidity-controlled rooms on a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on at 6:00 AM) in an accredited animal care facility. In this study, a total of 11 TG and 8 NC mice were used for analysis of microglia morphological characteristics and for performing the correlations with dMRI metrics.
2.2. MRI acquisition
Mice were anesthetized using an isoflurane set at the following percentages: 3% for induction, 2% during pilot scanning and data acquisition. An animal monitoring unit (SA instruments, Inc., model 1025, Stony Brook, NY) was used to record respiration and rectal temperature. Respiration was measured with a pressure transducer placed under the abdomen just below the ribcage. Body temperature was maintained using ventilated warm air, controlled by a feedback circuit between the heater and thermistor. After induction, mice were placed on a mouse holder and restrained using a mouse tooth bar (Bruker, T10146) and ear bars (Bruker, T10147) placed in the auditory canal. Compressed air was used as the carrier gas and delivered at a flow rate of 1L/min to a nose cone positioned around the tooth bar, where gases mixed with air and passed over the rodent’s nose. All animals were maintained at 37.0 ± 0.2 °C and respiration ranged between 60 and 80 breaths per minute during scanning.
The in vivo MRI experiments were all performed on a 7T Bruker Biospin 30 cm bore scanner (BioSpec 70/30 USR) running Paravision version 5.1. This system is equipped with a 12 cm high performance B-GA 12S2 gradient and shim coil set, capable of generating a maximum gradient amplitude of 440 mT/m and a slew rate of 4570 T/m/s. A 86 mm 1H quadrature volume coil (T128038) was used for signal transmission, and an actively decoupled phase array coil (four channel receiver T11765) was used for signal reception. For dMRI data acquisition, we employed a diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) protocol40–42. DKI is an extension of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) that includes dMRI data acquired with stronger diffusion weightings than is typical for DTI and requires at least 2 different nonzero b-values41. DKI provides all the diffusion measures available with DTI plus additional measures related to the kurtosis of the water diffusion displacement probability density function42. The main imaging parameters were: a 2-shot SE-EPI sequence with TR/TE = 3750/32.6 ms, δ/Δ = 5/18ms, slice thickness = 0.7 mm, 15 slices with no gap, data matrix = 128×128, image resolution = 156×156 μm2, 2 signal acquisitions, 10 b-value = 0 (b0) images, followed by 30 diffusion encoding gradient directions with 4 b-values for each gradient direction (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 ms/μm2) and fat suppression flip angle = 105°. Total acquisition time = 33 minutes.
2.3. DKI post-processing and Image analysis
DKI post-processing was performed using Diffusional Kurtosis Estimator (DKE)43 (http://nitrc.org/projects/dke). Post-processing included motion correction by aligning all DWIs to the first b0 image using SPM12 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL, UK). Parametric maps were obtained by fitting dMRI signal measurements to the DKI signal model for each voxel using a linearly constrained weighted linear least squares fitting algorithm, which generated the diffusion and kurtosis tensors. These two tensors were then used to calculate parametric maps for several diffusion metrics42,44. Figure 1 illustrates, for a 3xTg-AD mouse, the maps for all diffusion metrics utilized in this study. In our analysis, we examined the four diffusion tensor (DT) parameters of mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (D∥), radial diffusivity (D⊥), and fractional anisotropy (FA). MD corresponds to the diffusivity averaged over all diffusion directions, D∥ corresponds to the diffusivity in the direction of the principal diffusion tensor eigenvector, D⊥ corresponds to the diffusivity averaged over all diffusion directions perpendicular to the principal diffusion tensor eigenvector, and FA quantifies the anisotropy of the diffusion tensor. We similarly considered the four diffusional kurtosis (DK) metrics of mean kurtosis (MK), axial kurtosis (K∥), radial kurtosis(K⊥), and kurtosis fractional anisotropy (KFA). These are kurtosis analogs of the DT metrics that quantify diffusional non-Gaussianity and provide complementary information about the diffusion dynamics42,44. All four b-values (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 ms/μm2), for each gradient direction, were used in calculating the diffusion metrics. It is worth noting that, due to the inclusion of non-Gaussian effects, DKI yields more accurate estimates of DT metrics than does conventional DTI45, as well as enabling a more comprehensive assessment of the diffusion microenvironment in brain tissue.
Figure 1.

Representative diffusion MRI parametric maps of all diffusion measures, for a single anatomical slice, from a 3xTg-AD mouse. The top row shows the DT measures of mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (D∥), radial diffusivity (D⊥) and fractional anisotropy (FA). The bottom row shows the DK measures of mean kurtosis (MK), axial kurtosis (K∥), radial kurtosis (K⊥) and kurtosis fractional anisotropy (KFA). Scale bars: 0–1 for FA and KFA; 0–2 μm2/ms for MD, D∥ and D⊥; 0–3 for MK, K∥, and K⊥.
Regions of interest (ROIs) were defined for corpus callosum (CC), fimbria (Fi), hippocampus [including dorsal (HD), ventral (HV) and subiculum (Sub) areas], and cortex [ cingulate (Ctx_Cg) and retrosplenial cortex (Ctx_Rsp)], which are all brain regions relevant to AD pathology. All ROIs were manually drawn on the averaged b0 image by a neuropathologist (MFF), using ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij//)46. Anatomical guidelines for outlining these regions were determined by comparing anatomical structures in the MRI slices with a standard mouse atlas47 and verified with the FA maps to ensure correct anatomical location and to avoid contamination of unintended tissue or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Figure 2 shows FA maps for a 3xTg-AD mouse with the selected ROIs drawn. The regional values for the dMRI measures were obtained by averaging all voxels within an ROI except those with MD > 1.5 μm2/ms, which were excluded to minimize the effect of CSF contamination.
Figure 2:

Representative fractional anisotropy (FA) maps of a 2-month-old 3xTg-AD mouse illustrating examples of the region of interest (ROI): corpus callosum (CC - red), fimbria (Fi - purple), dorsal (HD - blue) and ventral (HV - yellow) hippocampus, subiculum (Sub – light green), cingulate cortex (Ctx_Cg – orange) and retrosplenial cortex (Ctx_Rsp - dark green).
2.4. Histological protocol
Following the MRI scan, mice from each group (TG, n = 11; NC, n = 8) were perfused with ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by paraformaldehyde (4%) in PBS. Mice brains were then removed and post-fixed overnight in the same fixative, and subsequently transferred to a storage buffer PBS with 0.02% sodium azide until final processing by NeuroScience Associates (Knoxville, TN, USA). The brains were embedded into a gelatin matrix, frozen and sectioned from one solid block (MultiBrain® Technology). Sections of 25 μm thickness were taken in the coronal plane, wet-mounted on 2% gelatin-subbed slides, and stained using ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule (Iba1) (Abcam ab178846, Cambridge, MA, USA) aimed at microglia (MØ) identification. To assess myelin and axonal abnormalities, subsequent sections were stained for myelin basic protein (MBP; Abcam ab40390, Cambridge, MA, USA), and neurofilament (NF; Neurofilament-200, Sigma Aldrich N4142, Burlington, MA, USA). Histological slices were digitized in one session using an Olympus BX53 microscope (Olympus Corporation of the Americas, Center Valley, PA) with QImaging digital camera and QCapture Suite. Images (40x magnification) were acquired for MØ and images (4x magnification) were acquired for the MBP and NF, under the same image light and camera settings to avoid possible image intensity variation, and then saved as 8-bit RGB images.
The quantification of the immunoreactivity for both MBP and NF was done by averaging the mean grayscale intensity measurements from all pixels in each ROI, which were manually drawn based on the mouse brain atlas47 by a neuropathologist (MFF) on the same regions as for the dMRI data, in both hemispheres. MBP and NF values were expressed as optical density (OD) = log (max intensity/mean intensity)37, where max intensity = 255 for the 8-bit images.
For the 2D-morphological MØ evaluation, IBA-1 labeled 40x images were used and depending on the ROI, either four (CC, Fi, HD, Sub) or six (HV, Ctx_Cg and Ctx_Rsp) images for each mouse were analyzed, generating a large number of images for each ROI (e.g.,18 mice and 6 HV images/per mouse = 108 images). Figure 3 illustrates the series of steps performed in order to analyze the MØ morphological aspects, which included: 1) conversion of RGB image to grayscale using maximum intensity projection (MIP) to retain intensity features from each channel; 2) noise removal with 5 × 5 low-pass Weiner filter; 3) removal of uneven background illumination with a morphological top-hat filter; 4) removal of small noise-like features with fast-Fourier transform (FFT) bandpass filter, where the lower and upper bounds were 50 and 100 Hz respectively; 5) image sharpening with unsharpen mask using a Gaussian lowpass filter with σ = 3; and 6) rescaling the image from 0 to 1. Additionally, a marker-controlled watershed segmentation algorithm48 was employed to balance over- and under-segmentation of overlapping cellular regions. Since the slice thickness of each histological section is 25 μm, the 2D images contain partial branches, fragmented and/or overlapping MØ cells; thus, to overcome this issue, we also excluded cells with only two endpoints, cells with branch length and/or sum of all branch lengths less than 5μm, and when the pixels area occupied by the cell was less than 100 μm2.
Figure 3:

Image processing and segmentation strategy for microglia quantification. The original image (A, enlargement Ai) was first converted to grayscale with maximum intensity projection and inverted, followed by denoising, removal of uneven background illumination, fast Fourier transform bandpass filtering, image sharpening, and rescaling to prepare a processed image (B, enlargement Bi) for segmentation. Soma locations were marked as regional minima to produce a composite image for watershed segmentation (C, enlargement Ci), which yielded a segmented and labelled image (D, enlargement Di) where the cell perimeter defined by the blue boundary, and the skeletonized microglia by the red line.
The analysis was performed with a MATLAB script (R2022a; 9.12.0.1884302) based on the widely used fractal analysis (FracLac plugin) for ImageJ49–53 and skeletonize analysis (Analyze Skeleton plugin)54,55. The MATLAB script facilitated the analysis of the large number of images containing many MØ cells by automatically running the image processing and segmentation steps, labeling MØ cells and generating the parameters values. Nevertheless, after the image processing and segmentation steps were performed, all images and labeled MØ cells were reviewed, blinded to the mouse group, by a neuropathologist (MFF), so that only individual and complete MØ cells, not in contact with the edges of the image, fragmented, or in cell clusters were counted (total number of MØ) and included for analysis. For this study, we assessed the number of MØ cells and employed fractal analysis in order to report on cell complexity (fractal dimension), elongation of microglia in WM ROIs (span ratio) and MØ cell size (density) in 2-month-old 3xTg-AD and control mice. Figure 4 shows the pictorial representation and definition of the fractal analysis parameters examined for the microglia morphological analysis.
Figure 4:

Pictorial representation and definition of the fractal analysis parameters examined for the microglia morphological analysis.
2.5. Statistical analyses
Summary statistics are expressed as group-averaged means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for dMRI metrics and morphological measurements (MBP/NF/MØ). Two-tailed, two-sample t-tests, assuming unequal variances, were performed to assess group differences in each ROI for all measurements. To evaluate the relationship between measures of microglia morphology and dMRI changes, Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated. Correlations were done for all mice pooled together due to the small number of mice in each group. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Given the exploratory nature of this study, no adjustments for multiple comparison corrections were performed. Analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism (v.9.1.2).
3. Results
In the present study, we performed a quantitative morphological evaluation of the MØ cells and how MØ number and morphological changes, as determined by fractal analysis parameters, correlates with MBP and NF degree and dMRI metrics in different brain regions of 2-month-old 3xTg-AD mice. MØ results for each ROI are presented in Figure 5. Bar graphs show the distribution of the data points for each mouse group and means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for the following parameters: A) the number of MØ; B) span ratio; C) fractal dimension; D) density. Since span ratio is a measure of MØ elongation, it is relevant and presented only for WM ROIS (CC and Fi). We also note that the density parameter, which is an indicator of MØ cell size, is calculated by taking into consideration the cell perimeter and the convex hull area (Fig. 4); therefore, a higher density value reveals smaller MØ cells.
Figure 5:

Bar graphs illustrating the microglia morphological quantitative analysis (Iba1 stain) for each ROI; graphs show the distribution of the data points for each mouse group and means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for the following microglia morphological parameters: A) Number of microglia cells; B) Span ratio; C) Fractal dimension; D) Density. Region of interest (ROI) abbreviations: corpus callosum (CC), fimbria (Fi), dorsal (HD) and ventral (HV) hippocampus, subiculum (Sub), cingulate cortex (Ctx_Cg) and retrosplenial cortex (Ctx_Rsp); p-values at the level of * p ≤0.05; ** p ≤0.01; ***p ≤0.001
Our results demonstrate that, even at this young age (2-month-old), the number of MØ cells is increased in TG mice, statistically significant for almost all ROIs examined, except HD (Fig.5A). TG mice MØ cells also presented with significantly different morphological characteristics compared with NC mice, depending on the brain region examined. In the CC, despite a trend for less elongated (span ratio; Fig.5B), more complex (fractal dimension; Fig.5C) and smaller (density; Fig.5D) cells, no statistically significant group differences were observed for these parameters. In the Fi, MØ cells were significantly less elongated (span ratio; Fig.5B) and more complex (fractal dimension; Fig.5C) in the TG mice. In the HD, although TG mice appears to have more MØ cells than NC mice, this difference did not reach statistical significance (Fig.5A); however, MØ cells were significantly smaller (density; Fig.5D) in TG mice compared to NC mice. In the HV, Sub, Ctx_Cg and Ctx_Rsp, TG mice had significantly more MØ cells, which were more complex (fractal dimension; Fig.5C) and smaller (density; Fig.5D) than did NC mice.
Results for the quantification of MBP and NF immunoreactivity in WM ROIs are presented in Table 1A, showing significantly reduced MBP in the Fi of the TG mice, with trends for NF decrease in the Fi, and trends of both NF and MBP decrease in the CC. Table 1B, shows Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r) with statistically significant p-values for the association between several MØ morphological parameters and MBP and NF immunoreactivity degree in these two WM ROIs.
Table 1A:
Quantitative analysis of the myelin basic protein (MBP) and neurofilament (NF) immunoreactivity; group-averaged means ± standard error (SEM) in each white matter brain region (ROI). 3xTg-AD (TG) and normal control (NC) mice; corpus callosum (CC); fimbria (Fi).
| ROI | Variable | Mean TG | Mean NC | Mean Difference | SEM TG | SEM NC | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | MBP | 34.58 | 38.00 | −3.42 | 0.97 | 1.51 | 0.062 |
| CC | NF | 30.50 | 33.41 | −2.91 | 1.02 | 2.19 | 0.206 |
| Fi | MBP | 32.84 | 37.37 | −4.53 | 0.82 | 1.73 | 0.019 |
| Fi | NF | 29.53 | 32.68 | −3.15 | 0.96 | 1.24 | 0.057 |
Table 1B:
Spearman’s correlation values (r) and p-values measuring the association between MØ morphological parameters and myelin basic protein (MBP) and neurofilament (NF) immunoreactivity in each white matter brain region (ROI). corpus callosum (CC); fimbria (Fi); both groups pulled together (ALL).
| ROI | Group | MØ Metric | MBP/NF | r | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | ALL | Fractal | NF | −0.592 | 0.008 |
| Fi | ALL | Fractal | MBP | −0.522 | 0.022 |
| Fi | ALL | Span Ratio | MBP | 0.513 | 0.025 |
| CC | ALL | Cells n | NF | −0.497 | 0.030 |
| CC | ALL | Span Ratio | MBP | 0.496 | 0.031 |
| CC | ALL | Density | NF | −0.459 | 0.050 |
Table 2 displays the Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r) with statistically significant p-values for the association between MØ morphological parameters and dMRI metrics ranked by higher p-value for each ROI. Our results indicate that MØ morphological characteristics are significantly correlated with several dMRI metrics, depending on the brain region examined. We highlight that more MØ cells in the CC correlates with higher K⊥ and lower FA and KFA.
Table 2:
Spearman’s correlation values (r) and p-values measuring the association between MØ morphological parameters and diffusion MRI (dMRI) metrics for each region of interest (ROI), ranked by higher p-value; region of interest (ROI) abbreviations: corpus callosum (CC), fimbria (Fi), ventral (HV) hippocampus, subiculum (Sub), cingulate cortex (Ctx_Cg) and retrosplenial cortex (Ctx_Rsp). Mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (D||), radial diffusivity (D⊥), fractional anisotropy (FA), radial kurtosis (K⊥), and kurtosis fractional anisotropy. NC: control mice; TG: 3xTg-AD mouse; ALL: both groups pulled together.
| ROI | Group | MØ Metric | dMRI Metric | r | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | ALL | Cells n | D⊥ | 0.590 | 0.008 |
| Sub | ALL | Density | D∥ | 0.573 | 0.010 |
| CC | ALL | Cells n | KFA | −0.549 | 0.015 |
| Ctx Cg | ALL | Density | KFA | 0.539 | 0.017 |
| Fi | ALL | Span Ratio | FA | 0.514 | 0.024 |
| CC | ALL | Span Ratio | K⊥ | 0.513 | 0.025 |
| Fi | ALL | Cells n | D∥ | −0.469 | 0.043 |
| CC | ALL | Cells n | FA | −0.496 | 0.031 |
| Fi | ALL | Span Ratio | KFA | 0.490 | 0.033 |
| HV | ALL | Density | D∥ | 0.487 | 0.034 |
| Ctx Rsp | ALL | Cells n | D∥ | 0.476 | 0.039 |
| Sub | ALL | Density | MD | 0.456 | 0.050 |
A representative of the Iba1 stain (40× objective) is shown on Figure 6 exemplifying the MØ morphological aspects for each group for Fi and Sub. The images display the Fi-NC MØ cells with a more elongated and smaller soma compared with Fi-TG MØ cells, which shows an increase in number of less elongated MØ, with a larger soma and shorter branches. In the Sub-TG, MØ number is also increased and characterized by cells with a larger cell body and shorter, thicker branches. These aspects reflect an activated MØ state in these regions.
Figure 6:

Representative images of the Iba1 stain (40× objective) for fimbria (Fi) and subiculum (Sub), for both normal control (NC) and 3xTg-AD (TG) mice exemplifying the microglia morphological aspects of each group. The images display the Fi-NC MØ cells with a more elongated and smaller soma compared with Fi-TG, which shows an increase in number of less elongated MØ, with a larger soma and shorter branches. In the Sub-TG, MØ number is also increased and characterized by cells with a larger cell body and shorter, thick branches.
4. Discussion
The morphology and distribution of MØ cells varies among different regions of the brain2,3, reflecting its sensitivity to the surrounding microenvironment. In this study, we focused our analysis on the comparison of MØ morphological features between NC and TG mice and explored how alterations in MØ morphology are associated with dMRI measures.
When we examined the two WM ROIs (CC and Fi), where in normal conditions MØ cells would have an elongated soma and branches preferentially oriented along fiber tracts2,3, TG mice had significantly more MØ cells (Fig.5A) in both regions, but despite a trend to have smaller and complex MØ cells, no group differences were observed in the CC. However, in the Fi, MØ cells were less elongated (Fig.5B) and more complex (Fig.5C), reflecting an activated MØ state (Fig. 6) in this WM region, which correlated with less MBP in these mice (Table 1A–B). Despite no significant MØ morphological group differences in the CC, the increase of MØ cells, mainly complex and small cells, correlated with less NF, whereas more elongated MØ cells, reflecting normal conditions, correlated with more MBP. Thus, it is likely that both MØ morphological changes and myelin defects present in the TG mice at this young age are combining factors driving these correlations. When considering the dMRI metrics (Table 2), the increase of MØ cells in the CC correlated with higher in D⊥ and lower FA and KFA, while more elongated MØ, which is the normal cells aspect in WM, correlated with higher K⊥. In the Fi, more typical elongated MØ cells (Fig.5B) correlated with higher FA and KFA (Table 2), showing that MØ elongation in this region is associated with microstructural anisotropy as quantified by dMRI. However, the increase in the number of MØ cells was associated with lower D∥, probably reflecting a more restricted diffusion environment. As we previously reported in these two WM regions37, TG mice have lower FA, KFA and K⊥, and higher diffusivity compared with NC mice supporting the notion that dMRI can detect early WM abnormalities representing a combination of myelin abnormalities and the presence of activated MØ cells in young 2-month-old 3xTg-AD mice.
In the HD, TG mice had smaller MØ cells (Fig.5D) than NC mice, but no correlations with dMRI metrics were observed. As seen in Fig. 5 (A, C, D) and Table 2, the TG mice HV and Sub had significantly more MØ cells than NC mice, which were smaller and more complex, all features of activated MØ cells, and the presence of small MØ cells correlated with higher D∥. These results suggest that the presence of small MØ in the HV and Sub are associated with a less restricted diffusion environment, which is an indication of early microstructural abnormalities in the hippocampus of young TG mice. Indeed, our previous results from a large dMRI data set37 shows that TG mice has statistically significant higher MD, D∥ and D⊥ in all regions of the hippocampus, which are likely related to changes in the structural integrity of the hippocampal complex, associated with early MØ-mediated neuroinflammation reported in young 3xTg-AD mice56,57.
In the cortex (Ctx_Cg and Ctx_Rsp), TG mice had more MØ cells than NC mice, which were smaller and more complex (Fig.5 A, C, D). In the Ctx_Cg, small cells correlated with higher KFA, and in the Ctx_Rsp more MØ cells correlated with higher D∥ (Table 2). Quantification of MBP immunoreactivity in both cortices showed significantly lower levels (Ctx_Cg; p= 0.008 and Ctx_Rsp; p= 0.002) in the 3xTg-AD mice compared to the NC, with no changes in the NF levels. Together these changes demonstrate early MØ activation associated with myelin dysfunction in the cortex of young 3xTg-AD mice.
It is well known that inflammation contributes to neurodegeneration at later stages of AD15–17,21. Likewise, alterations in MØ number and activation have been reported in AD mouse models, particularly in the hippocampus and the cerebral cortex, mostly alongside Aβ deposition22,23, 29, 58–60. However, it is not clear which role MØ-mediated inflammation may play in early disease pathogenesis. One suggestion is that MØ may have a promoting role early in AD pathogenesis58–60, but may be beneficial at a later stage by preventing the spread of neurotoxic plaques62–64. Additionally, activated MØ have been classified with two distinctive phenotypes, namely, the M1 (pro-inflammatory or neurotoxic) associated with expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and M2 (non-inflammatory or neuroprotective) characterized by the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines65,66. Thus far, in the 3xTg-AD mice, most studies describe an increase in MØ number starting at 6 months of age, preceding significant extracellular amyloid plaque deposition, but mirroring the regional and temporal distribution of pathology observed in AD brains28,29,61,62. However, no detailed MØ morphology or inflammatory phenotype has been described in this model at this young age. Therefore, our study is the first to report the presence of activated MØ cells in young 2-month-old 3xTg-AD mice, which at this age have increased soluble Aβ42 levels65 and shows the beginning of intraneuronal Aβ accumulation25–27, both known to contribute to MØ activation65,66. We also give, for the first time, evidence supporting the sensitivity of dMRI metrics to these MØ alterations associated with myelin dysfunction and microstructural integrity abnormalities in this AD mice.
In fact, only a few dMRI studies have investigated whether alterations in MØ number would significantly affect dMRI measures, reporting that the increase in MØ number is associated with changes in dMRI metrics of axonal integrity and structural connectivity68–69. However, important methodological factors distinguish our study from these prior investigations (e.g., ex-vivo imaging, drug induced microglia depletion and rat model of spine damage), making it difficult to directly compare results. Moreover, only one of those three studies involved studying a different mouse model of AD68, and although they reported clustered activated MØ associated with Aβ and changes in diffusion and functional MRI, no correlations between imaging and morphological data were presented.
In summary, our findings indicate that early MØ proliferation/activation, coupled with myelin abnormalities are a common and widespread feature in 2-month-old 3xTg-AD mice. Furthermore, our results suggest that dMRI is able to detect these early MØ and myelin morphological abnormalities. This is particularly apparent in WM regions, where we previously reported FA and KFA is significantly lower in the CC and Fi of the TG mice37, and in this study both regions’ MØ morphological parameters correlated with several dMRI metrics. This is also evident in the hippocampus, where we reported increase in diffusivity metrics in the TG mice37, and in this study the presence of more activated MØ cells in this region correlated with higher D∥. However, our results should be considered in the context of some methodological limitations. First, for both the morphological analysis and for the Spearman correlation with dMRI metrics, there was a relatively small number of mice in each group. Also, we have not performed adjustments for multiple comparisons, but rather presented the uncorrected results to provide a broad overview and allowing readers to draw their own conclusions based on these. Thus, these results should be thoughtfully interpreted. Further studies are needed to assess markers for MØ phenotype and cytokine production, which could help associate MØ morphological changes with their inflammatory profiles16. Finally, the role of increased soluble Aβ in MØ activation in these young 3xTg-AD mice should be investigated, as well as which role MØ-mediated inflammation, at this early age, plays in myelin dysfunction and in the progression of AD pathology.
6. Conclusion
In this study, we have demonstrated in 2-month-old 3xTg-AD mice the presence of activated MØ cells, which are associated with myelin dysfunction and microstructural integrity abnormalities and found significant correlations between their morphological characteristics and several dMRI metrics. Since the imaging methods employed here are easily translatable to clinical MRI, the results of this study are also relevant to human AD. Consequently, dMRI holds promise for early detection of neuroinflammation in AD and for monitoring the effects of future therapeutic interventions aimed to reduce microglial neurotoxicity.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (1RF1AG057602-01) to M.F.F and J.H.J.
Abbreviations:
- AD
Alzheimer’s disease
- WM
white matter
- MØ
Microglia
- DK
diffusional kurtosis
- DKI
diffusional kurtosis imaging
- DT
diffusion tensor
- DTI
diffusion tensor imaging
- FA
fractional anisotropy
- MD
mean diffusivity
- D‖
axial diffusivity
- D⊥
radial diffusivity
- KFA
kurtosis fractional anisotropy
- MK
mean diffusional kurtosis
- K‖
axial kurtosis
- K⊥
radial kurtosis
- CC
corpus callosum
- Fi
fimbria
- HD
dorsal hippocampus
- HV
ventral hippocampus
- Sub
subiculum
- Ctx_Cg
cingulate cortex
- Ctx_Rsp
retrosplenial cortex
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Declaration of Competing Interest
None.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Maria Fatima Falangola: Conceptualization, Data analysis, Writing Original draft, Visualization, Funding acquisition. Siddhartha Dhiman: Software, Visualization, Reviewing and Editing. Joshua Voltin: Data analysis, Reviewing and Editing. Jens H. Jensen: Reviewing and Editing, Funding acquisition. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References:
- 1.Kreutzberg GW. Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci 1996;19:312–318. 10.1016/0166-2236(96)10049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Augusto-Oliveira M, Arrifano GP, Delage CI, Tremblay MÈ, Crespo-Lopez ME, Verkhratsky A. Plasticity of microglia. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2022;97(1):217–250. 10.1111/brv.12797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lawson LJ, Perry VH, Dri P, Gordon S. Heterogeneity in the distribution and morphology of microglia in the normal adult mouse brain. Neuroscience 1990;39(1):151–170. 10.1016/0306-4522(90)90229-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tan YL, Yuan Y, Tian L. Microglial regional heterogeneity and its role in the brain. Mol Psychiatry 2020;25(2):351–367. 10.1038/s41380-019-0609-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Davis EJ, Foster TD, and Thomas WE. Cellular forms and functions of brain microglia. Brain Res Bull 1994;34(1):73–78. 10.1016/0361-9230(94)90189-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nimmerjahn A, Kirchhoff F, Helmchen F. Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science 2005;308(5726):1314–8. 10.1126/science.1110647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Paolicelli RC, Bolasco G, Pagani F, et al. Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development. Science 2011;333(6048),1456–8. 10.1126/science.1202529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li Y, Du XF, Liu CS, Wen ZL, Du JL. Reciprocal regulation between resting microglial dynamics and neuronal activity in vivo. Dev Cell 2012;23(6): 1189–1202. 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miyamoto A, Wake H, Moorhouse AJ, Nabekura J. Microglia and synapse interactions: fine tuning neural circuits and candidate molecules. Front Cell Neurosci 2013;7:70. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Béchade C, Cantaut-Belarif Y, Bessis A. Microglial control of neuronal activity. Front Cell Neurosci 2013;7:32. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thion MS, Ginhoux F, Garel S. Microglia and early brain development: An intimate journey. Science 2018;362(6411):185–189. 10.1126/science.aat0474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Traiffort E, Kassoussi A, Zahaf A, Laouarem Y. Astrocytes and Microglia as Major Players of Myelin Production in Normal and Pathological Conditions. Front Cell Neurosci 2020;14:79. 10.3389/fncel.2020.00079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Santos EN, Fields RD. Regulation of myelination by microglia. Sci Adv 2021;7(50):eabk1131. 10.1126/sciadv.abk1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Streit WJ, Sammons NW, Kuhns AJ, Sparks DL. Dystrophic microglia in the aging human brain. Glia 2004;45(2):208–12. 10.1002/glia.10319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Davies DS, Ma J, Jegathees T, Goldsbury C. Microglia show altered morphology and reduced arborization in human brain during aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol 2021;27(6):795–808. 10.1111/bpa.12456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bennett ML, Viaene AN. What are activated and reactive glia and what is their role in neurodegeneration? Neurobiol Dis 2021;148:105172. 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kinney JW, Bemiller SM, Murtishaw AS, Leisgang AM, Salazar AM, Lamb BT. Inflammation as a central mechanism in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2018;4:575–590. 10.1016/j.trci.2018.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Streit W, Khoshbouei H, Bechmann I. Dystrophic microglia in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Glia 2020;68(4):845–854. 10.1002/glia.23782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sobue A, Komine O, Hara Y, et al. Microglial gene signature reveals loss of homeostatic microglia associated with neurodegeneration of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2021;9(1):1. 10.1186/s40478-020-01099-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Streit WJ, Khoshbouei H, Bechmann I. The Role of Microglia in Sporadic Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2021;79(3):961–968. 10.3233/JAD-201248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Edler MK, Mhatre-Winters I, Richardson JR. Microglia in Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Comparative Species Review. Cells 2021;10(5):1138. 10.3390/cells10051138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Baron R, Babcock AA, Nemirovsky A, Finsen B, Monsonego A. Accelerated microglial pathology is associated with Aβ plaques in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell 2014;13(4):584–95. 10.1111/acel.12210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Crapser JD, Spangenberg EE, Barahona RA, Arreola MA, Hohsfield LA, Green KN. Microglia facilitate loss of perineuronal nets in the Alzheimer’s disease brain. EBioMedicine 2020;58:102919. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Safaiyan S, Besson-Girard S, Kaya T, et al. White matter aging drives microglial diversity. Neuron 2021;109(7):1100–1117.e10. 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oddo S, Caccamo A, Shepherd JD, et al. Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Aβ and synaptic dysfunction. Neuron 2003;39(3):409–421. 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00434-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Oddo S, Caccamo A, Kitazawa M, Tseng BP, LaFerla FM. Amyloid deposition precedes tangle formation in a triple transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2003;24(8):1063–70. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Oddo S, Caccamo A, Tran L, et al. Temporal profile of amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomerization in an in vivo model of Alzheimer disease. A link between Aβ and tau pathology. J Biol Chem 2006;281(3):1599–604. 10.1074/jbc.M507892200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Belfiore R, Rodin A, Ferreira E, et al. Temporal and regional progression of Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in 3xTg-AD mice. Aging Cell 2019;18(1):e12873. 10.1111/acel.12873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Janelsins MC, Mastrangelo MA, Oddo S, LaFerla FM, Federoff HJ, Bowers WJ. Early correlation of microglial activation with enhanced tumor necrosis factor-alpha and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression specifically within the entorhinal cortex of triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice. J Neuroinflammation 2005;18;2:23. 10.1186/1742-2094-2-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Desai MK, Sudol KL, Janelsins MC, Mastrangelo MA, Frazer ME, Bowers WJ. Triple-transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice exhibit region-specific abnormalities in brain myelination patterns prior to appearance of amyloid and tau pathology. Glia 2009;57(1):54–65. 10.1002/glia.20734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Desai MK, Mastrangelo MA, Ryan DA, Sudol KL, Narrow WC, Bowers WJ. Early oligodendrocyte/myelin pathology in Alzheimer’s disease mice constitutes a novel therapeutic target. Am J Pathol 2010;177(3):1422–35. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sterniczuk R, Dyck RH, Laferla FM, Antle MC. Characterization of the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: part 1. Circadian changes. Brain Res 2010; 1348:139–48. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Le Bihan D, Johansen-Berg H. Diffusion MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function. Neuroimage 2012;61(2):324–41. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Afzali M, Pieciak T, Newman S, et al. The sensitivity of diffusion MRI to microstructural properties and experimental factors. J Neurosci Methods 2021;347:108951. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Falangola MF, Nie X, Ward R, et al. Diffusion MRI detects basal forebrain cholinergic abnormalities in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Magn Reson Imaging 2021;83:1–13. 10.1016/j.mri.2021.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nie X, Falangola MF, Ward R, et al. Diffusion MRI detects longitudinal white matter changes in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Magn Reson Imaging 2019;57:235–242. 10.1016/j.mri.2018.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Falangola MF, Nie X, Ward R, et al. Diffusion MRI detects early brain microstructure abnormalities in 2-month-old 3×Tg-AD mice. NMR Biomed 2020;33(9):e4346. 10.1002/nbm.4346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Carroll JC, Rosario ER, Kreimer S, et al. Sex differences in β-amyloid accumulation in 3xTg-AD mice: role of neonatal sex steroid hormone exposure. Brain research 2010;1366:233–45. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hirata-Fukae C, Li HF, Hoe HS, et al. Females exhibit more extensive amyloid, but not tau, pathology in an Alzheimer transgenic model. Brain Res 2008;1216:92–103. 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn reson Med 2005;53(6):1432–40. 10.1002/mrm.20508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lu H, Jensen JH, Ramani A, Helpern JA. Three-dimensional characterization of non-gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging. NMR Biomed 2006;19(2):236–247. 10.1002/nbm.1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jensen JH, Helpern JA. MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. NMR Biomed 2010;23(7):698–710. 10.1002/nbm.1518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tabesh A, Jensen JH, Ardekani BA, Helpern JA. Estimation of tensors and tensor-derived measures in diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011;65(3):823–36. 10.1002/mrm.22655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Glenn GR, Helpern JA, Tabesh A, Jensen JH. Quantitative assessment of diffusional kurtosis anisotropy. NMR Biomed 2015;28(4):448–59. 10.1002/nbm.3271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Veraart J, Poot DH, Van Hecke W, et al. More accurate estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using diffusion kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011;65(1):138–45. 10.1002/mrm.22603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012;9(7):671–5. 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Paxinos G, Franklin K. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. Compact 2nd ed. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Meyer F Topographic distance and watershed lines. Signal Process 1994;38(1):113–125. 10.1016/0165-1684(94)90060-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Karperien A. FracLac for ImageJ, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/plugins/fraclac/Frac_Lac.jar; 2001. [Accessed October 1, 2011].
- 50.Karperien A, Ahammer H, Jelinek HF. Quantitating the subtleties of microglial morphology with fractal analysis. Front Cell Neurosci 2013;7:3. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Young K, Morrison H. Quantifying Microglia Morphology from Photomicrographs of Immunohistochemistry Prepared Tissue Using ImageJ. J Vis Exp 2018;(136). 10.3791/57648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Morrison H, Young K, Qureshi M, Rowe RK, Lifshitz J. Quantitative microglia analyses reveal diverse morphologic responses in the rat cortex after diffuse brain injury. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):13211. 10.1038/s41598-017-13581-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fernández-Arjona MDM, Grondona JM, Granados-Durán P, Fernández-Llebrez P, López-Ávalos MD. Microglia Morphological Categorization in a Rat Model of Neuroinflammation by Hierarchical Cluster and Principal Components Analysis. Front Cell Neurosci 2017;11:235. 10.3389/fncel.2017.00235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Morrison HW, Filosa JA. A quantitative spatiotemporal analysis of microglia morphology during ischemic stroke and reperfusion. J Neuroinflammation 2013;10:4. 10.1186/1742-2094-10-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Young K, Morrison H. Quantifying Microglia Morphology from Photomicrographs of Immunohistochemistry Prepared Tissue Using ImageJ. J Vis Exp 2018;(136):57648. 10.3791/57648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kong V, Devenyi GA, Gallino D, et al. Early-in-life neuroanatomical and behavioural trajectories in a triple transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Struct Funct 2018;223(7):3365–3382. 10.1007/s00429-018-1691-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chiquita S, Ribeiro M, Castelhano J, et al. A longitudinal multimodal in vivo molecular imaging study of the 3xTg-AD mouse model shows progressive early hippocampal and taurine loss. Hum Mol Genet 2019;28(13):2174–2188. 10.1093/hmg/ddz045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dudal S, Krzywkowski P, Paquette J, et al. Inflammation occurs early during the Aβ deposition process in TgCRND8 mice. Neurobiol Aging 2004;25(7):861–71. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Radde R, Bolmont T, Kaeser SA, et al. Aβ42-driven cerebral amyloidosis in transgenic mice reveals early and robust pathology. EMBO Rep 2006;7(9):940–6. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yin Z, Raj D, Saiepour N, van Dam D, et al. Immune hyperreactivity of Aβ plaque-associated microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2017;55:115–122. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rodríguez JJ, Witton J, Olabarria M, Noristani HN, Verkhratsky A. Increase in the density of resting microglia precedes neuritic plaque formation and microglial activation in a transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Death Dis 2010;1:e1. 10.1038/cddis.2009.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rodríguez J, Noristani H, Hilditch T, et al. Increased densities of resting and activated microglia in the dentate gyrus follow senile plaque formation in the CA1 subfield of the hippocampus in the triple transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 2013;552:129–34. 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Heneka MT, Carson MJ, El Khoury J, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2015;14(4):388–405. 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70016-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Xu YJ, Au NPB, Ma CHE. Functional and Phenotypic Diversity of Microglia: Implication for Microglia-Based Therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2022;14:896852. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.896852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Girão da Cruz MT, Jordão J, Dasilva KA, et al. Early increases in soluble amyloid-β levels coincide with cholinergic degeneration in 3xTg-AD mice. J Alzheimers Dis 2012;32(2):267–72. 10.3233/JAD-2012-100732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tomiyama T, Matsuyama S, Iso H, et al. A mouse model of amyloid β oligomers: their contribution to synaptic alteration, abnormal tau phosphorylation, glial activation, and neuronal loss in vivo. J Neurosci 2010;30(14):4845–56. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5825-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Taquet M, Jankovski A, Rensonnet G, et al. Extra-axonal restricted diffusion as an in vivo marker of reactive microglia. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):13874. 10.1038/s41598-019-50432-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Liu L, Liu Y, Li N, et al. Multiple inflammatory profiles of microglia and altered neuroimages in APP/PS1 transgenic AD mice. Brain Res Bull 2020;156:86–104. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yi SY, Stowe NA, Barnett BR, Dodd K, Yu JJ. Microglial Density Alters Measures of Axonal Integrity and Structural Connectivity. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 2020;5(11):1061–1068. 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
