Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2023 Jul 20;33(16):3325–3337.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.061

A conserved pressure-driven mechanism for regulating cytosolic osmolarity

Katrina B Velle 1, Rikki M Garner 2, Tatihana K Beckford 1, Makaela Weeda 3, Chunzi Liu 4, Andrew S Kennard 1, Marc Edwards 3, Lillian K Fritz-Laylin 1,5,6,*
PMCID: PMC10529079  NIHMSID: NIHMS1914668  PMID: 37478864

SUMMARY

Controlling intracellular osmolarity is essential to all cellular life. Cells that live in hypo-osmotic environments like freshwater must constantly battle water influx to avoid swelling until they burst. Many eukaryotic cells use contractile vacuoles to collect excess water from the cytosol and pump it out of the cell. Although contractile vacuoles are essential to many species, including important pathogens, the mechanisms that control their dynamics remain unclear. To identify basic principles governing contractile vacuole function, we here investigate the molecular mechanisms of two species with distinct vacuolar morphologies from different eukaryotic lineages—the discoban Naegleria gruberi, and the amoebozoan slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. Using quantitative cell biology we find that, although these species respond differently to osmotic challenges, they both use actin for osmoregulation, as well as vacuolar-type proton pumps for filling contractile vacuoles. We also use analytical modeling to show that cytoplasmic pressure is sufficient to drive water out of contractile vacuoles in these species, similar to findings from the alveolate Paramecium multimicronucleatum. These analyses show that cytoplasmic pressure is sufficient to drive contractile vacuole emptying for a wide range of cellular pressures and vacuolar geometries. Because vacuolar-type proton-pump-dependent contractile vacuole filling and pressure-dependent emptying have now been validated in three eukaryotic lineages that diverged well over a billion years ago, we propose that this represents an ancient eukaryotic mechanism of osmoregulation.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1914668-f0001.jpg

eTOC blurb:

Contractile vacuoles—organelles that collect water and pump it out of cells—are essential for osmoregulation in species from across the eukaryotic tree. Despite their variable morphology, Velle et al. show that mechanisms used by Paramecium also drive contractile vacuole activity in Naegleria and Dictyostelium.

INTRODUCTION

Osmoregulation is critical for cell survival, and must be tightly controlled. Many species that inhabit hypo-osmotic environments use contractile vacuoles to collect excess water and pump it out of the cell—a similar strategy to bailing water from a leaking boat. Although these organelles are common across eukaryotic phyla (Figure 1A),1-11 have been long-studied,12 and are considered relevant drug targets in important pathogens,5, 10, 13 the mechanisms that drive contractile vacuole pumping remain mysterious.

Figure 1. Naegleria has a contractile vacuole network that requires vacuolar-type H+ ATPase activity.

Figure 1.

(A) The evolutionary relationships between select eukaryotes are shown using a cladogram, with Naegleria gruberi and Dictyostelium discoideum in bold. Filled circles indicate species that have been shown to use contractile vacuoles (CVs). (B) A representative N. gruberi cell stained with the membrane dye FM4-64 highlights the emptying and filling of its contractile vacuole network. (C) Contractile vacuole networks were imaged through multiple pump cycles. Vacuoles were tracked as they formed, grew, merged, and collapsed and are pseudocolored by pump (top). The graph shows the area (the 2-D footprint) corresponding to each contractile vacuole network over time. (D) Cells were treated with 100 nM of the vacuolar-type H+ ATPase inhibitor Bafilomycin A1 or 0.1% DMSO (carrier control), and imaged. Contractile vacuole network areas were tracked as in panel C.

See also Figures S1-S2, and Videos S1-S2.

Osmotic regulation by contractile vacuoles can be divided into two major steps: collection of water into a contractile vacuole network, and expulsion of water from the cell. The collection step relies on active transport of solutes and passive flow of water. Conserved vacuolar-type H+-ATPases (vacuolar-type proton pumps) establish an electrochemical gradient across the contractile vacuole membrane that is thought to promote ion flow into the contractile vacuole. The resulting ion gradient facilitates passive water flow from the cytosol through aquaporins,3, 14-22 although other mechanisms can also contribute to contractile vacuole filling via transfer of ions and membrane proteins, e.g. the fusion of acidocalcisomes with contractile vacuoles.5, 20, 23, 24 Contractile vacuole network morphology is dynamic and varies among species. Paramecium, for example, has two star-shaped contractile vacuole networks, with “canals” that extend outward into the cytosol to collect water that then flows into a central “bladder.”25, 26 In contrast, the contractile vacuole networks of Dictyostelium are less uniform, comprising tubules that collect water and expand to form bladders.4, 16, 27 Meanwhile, Amoeba proteus collects water into clusters of vacuoles that fuse to form bladders.28 In all of these networks, the bladders periodically expel their contents into the environment. During expulsion events, the contractile vacuole is maintained as a distinct compartment, which collapses into a membranous network when emptied.4, 27, 28 Paramecium contractile vacuoles expel water through a stable, dedicated pore,29 while Dictyostelium forms a transient pore encircled by an actin mesh that prevents intermixing of contractile vacuole and plasma membranes.30

The forces that power bladder emptying have been the focus of much speculation. One hypothesis suggests that contractile vacuole membranes prefer to form thin tubules rather than spherical bladders, and this tendency to tubulate pushes water out of the cell.16, 30-32 This hypothesis has not been directly tested, although water expulsion is slower in Dictyostelium cells lacking proteins that reinforce membrane curvature, consistent with an important role for tubulation in contractile vacuole function.33 A second hypothesis, based largely on localization data from Acanthamoba,34-37 invokes the existence of actomyosin networks that surround the bladder and contract to squeeze water out of the cell.2, 38 A third hypothesis, supported by analytical modeling of Paramecium contractile vacuoles,7 suggests that cytoplasmic pressure alone is sufficient to drive expulsion.11 To test these hypotheses and identify basic principles underlying contractile vacuole function, we study species from two distinct eukaryotic lineages: the well-studied amoebozoan slime mold Dictyostelium and Naegleria—a freshwater amoeba that diverged from amoebozoans over a billion years ago39-41 (Figure 1A).

In addition to occupying an evolutionary position useful for identifying conserved contractile vacuole mechanisms, Naegleria amoebae also have simplified cell biology and potential relevance to human health. Naegleria amoebae lack cytoplasmic microtubules,42-47 which guide contractile vacuole membrane trafficking in Dictyostelium,48 and anchor the contractile vacuole in a stable location in other species (e.g. Paramecium29). Contractile vacuoles are obvious in Naegleria; even early cell biologists observed 1-3 large contractile vacuole bladders forming from the coalescence of smaller vacuoles.8, 49 Studying Naegleria contractile vacuoles also has practical value; one Naegleria species, the “brain-eating amoeba” N. fowleri, causes a deadly brain infection for which we currently lack effective therapeutics.50 During infection, Naegleria transition from freshwater to cerebrospinal fluid, which is two orders of magnitude higher in osmolarity,51 making its contractile vacuole50 a potential Naegleria fowleri drug target.

Here, we identify core mechanisms used by both Naegleria and Dictyostelium to drive contractile vacuole function. We show that Naegleria, like Dictyostelium, rely on vacuolar-type proton pumps for filling contractile vacuoles. We also show that, although Naegleria and Dictyostelium respond differently to osmotic challenges, they both use actin networks for osmoregulation, but not for the water expulsion step. Finally, we use biophysical modeling to show that cytoplasmic pressure is sufficient to drive water expulsion in both Naegleria and Dictyostelium under a wide range of cellular pressures and vacuolar geometries. These findings suggest the potential for a universal mechanism of contractile vacuole pumping.

RESULTS

Naegleria use asynchronously filling contractile vacuole networks that require vacuolar-type proton pump activity

Unlike Dictyostelium,4, 15, 16, 27, 30, 32, 33, 48, 52-61 there is limited information available about Naegleria contractile vacuoles.8, 49, 62 To determine how similar Naegleria contractile vacuoles are to those of Dictyostelium, we quantified their dynamics using live cell imaging. To this end, we treated Naegleria gruberi cells with FM4-64, a membrane dye used in other species to label contractile vacuole membranes.16, 28 We also used an agarose overlay which flattened the cells and restricted the contractile vacuoles to a single focal plane (Figure 1B, S1A-B) and allowed the area of the contractile vacuole to be used as a proxy for its volume. Consistent with previous descriptions,8, 49, 62 we observed membrane-enclosed vacuoles that grew and shrank at regular intervals, with large bladders forming from the merging of smaller vacuoles (Figure 1B, Video S1A). These networks consist of round vacuoles, and therefore differ from the tubular networks formed by Dictyostelium.4, 16 Also in line with prior reports,8, 49, 62 these vacuoles were localized to the back of migrating cells (Figure S1C).

To track the fate of each compartment of a contractile vacuole network, we imaged cells through multiple pump cycles using phase contrast microscopy at a higher frame rate of 4 frames/sec (Figure 1C, Video S1B). To stimulate contractile vacuole activity, we imaged cells in water, which Naegleria can tolerate for at least 24 h (Figure S1B). Tracking individual vacuoles over time revealed occasional pauses during the expulsion period, where bladders neither grew nor shrank (e.g. Figure 1C, pump 1, 3-8 s). Rather than a single vacuole swelling period followed by a single pumping event, concurrent swelling and shrinking occurred in distinct compartments (Figure 1C, graph); as one large bladder collapses, other, smaller vacuoles grow, and eventually fuse to form the next bladder. This means that multiple generations of contractile vacuoles co-exist, with vacuoles sometimes becoming detectable two pumps in advance of their own pump (Figure 1C, pumps 3 and 4). The identity of the contractile vacuole system appears fluid, with vacuoles occasionally dispersing to occupy distinct spaces in the cell, and dispersed vacuoles sometimes fusing into larger systems (Video S2).

We next sought to determine how water moves from the cytosol into contractile vacuole networks. Other species,14, 19, 20, 22, 63 including Dictyostelium,15, 16 transport protons into their contractile vacuoles using vacuolar-type proton pumps, resulting in a contractile vacuole lumen that is hyperosmotic relative to the cytosol.21 Aquaporins in the contractile vacuole membrane then allow water to flow passively into the contractile vacuole.3, 17, 18 In Dictyostelium, vacuolar-type proton pumps are readily visualized using deep etch electron microscopy, where they appear as 10 nm pegs protruding from the contractile vacuole membrane.16 Similar pegs have been reported in Naegleria as well,16 consistent with our identification of a full complement of vacuolar-type H+ATPase subunits along with aquaporins in the Naegleria genome (Table 1, Figure S2A-B). To directly test if these proton pumps are required for contractile vacuole function in Naegleria, we treated cells with the vacuolar-type H+ATPase inhibitor Bafilomycin A1.64, 65 Treatment with 100 nM Bafilomycin A1 prevented the refilling of contractile vacuoles (Figure 1D, Figure S2C), consistent with vacuolar-type proton pump activity facilitating water flow from the cytosol into the contractile vacuole.

Table 1. The Naegleria genome contains homologs of aquaporins and a bafilomycin-sensitive v-ATPase.

Table of N. gruberi genes matching the given PFAM models for aquaporins or subunits of v-ATPase, as well as the top-scoring BLASTP hit to each N. gruberi gene in the S. cerevisiae or D. discoideum genome. Genes are referred to by their NCBI accession ID, as well as the JGI ID (for N. gruberi) or a conventional name (for S. cerevisiae and D. discoideum). Asterisk indicates that V1 subunit G did not return significant matches unless the low complexity filter was removed from the BLASTP settings–see Figure S2A-B and Methods.

Subunit Matching
PFAM ID(s)
N. gruberi gene Top S. cerevisiae
BLASTP hit
Top D. discoideum
BLASTP hit
JGI NCBI name NCBI name NCBI
v-ATPase V0 a PF01496 59034 XP_002673239.1 Vph1 NP_014913.3 vatM XP_629892.1
75402 XP_002669641.1
c, c' PF00137 82300 XP_002668836.1 Vma11 NP_015090.1 vatP XP_644319.1
4925 XP_002678119.1
83282 XP_002671873.1
c" 80877 XP_002673621.1 Vma16 NP_011891.1 DDB_G0274141 XP_644318.1
d PF01992 81090 XP_002672968.1 Vma6 NP_013552.3 vatD-2 XP_644445.1
v-ATPase V1 A PF00006, PF16886 59416 XP_002671597.1 Vma1 NP_010096.1 vatA XP_637351.1
B PF00006 55664 XP_002680466.1 Vma2 NP_009685.3 vatB XP_642608.1
C PF03223 77339 XP_002678623.1 Vma5 NP_012843.1 vatC XP_638562.1
D PF01813 49328 XP_002676793.1 Vma8 NP_010863.1 atp6v1d XP_643919.1
74068 XP_002670923.1
75597 XP_002669461.1
E PF01991 71627 XP_002673226.1 Vma4 NP_014977.3 vatE XP_643473.1
F PF01990 32528 XP_002678706.1 Vma7 NP_011534.1 vatF XP_645434.1
G PF03179 79649 XP_002677534.1 Vma10* NP_011905.1* vatG* XP_642039.2*
H PF03224, PF11698 78643 XP_002680972.1 Vma13 NP_015361.1 vatH XP_644034.1
Aquaporins PF00230 78300 XP_002681822.1 Aqy3 NP_116601.1 aqpB XP_641629.1
75649 XP_002669389.1 Aqy3 NP_116601.1 aqpB XP_641629.1

Because the contractile vacuole membrane and associated vacuolar-type proton pumps facilitate water flow into the vacuole lumen, its surface area likely plays a key role in osmoregulation. Having multiple smaller vacuoles provides a larger surface area than one single compartment of equal volume. To explore whether this increased surface area helps in building and/or maintaining an osmotic gradient, we developed a mathematical model based on mass conservation to derive a relation between the osmotic gradient across the contractile vacuole membrane and the osmotic gradient across the plasma membrane (Methods S1). This model suggests that an increased surface area allows water to flow into the contractile vacuole at a lower osmotic pressure difference between the cytosol and vacuole lumen. This means that a larger contractile vacuole membrane requires less vacuolar-type proton pump activity—and therefore less ATP—to regulate intracellular osmolarity. We also performed an orders-of-magnitude estimation of the “critical size” at which a contractile vacuole will pump by balancing the energetic gain from lowering the osmotic pressure and the energetic penalty from increasing membrane surface area. Entering reasonable values for membrane tension66, 67 into this equation results in a critical radius of 1 μm, consistent with our experimental measurements of 2.2-4.4 μm (Figure 1C-D). (Because individual cells vary in a wide variety of parameters, and because this is an order-of-magnitude estimation, these data are within the expected variability.) Taken together, these analyses indicate that the filling of Naegleria contractile vacuoles can be explained by a simple energetic balance between the osmotic pressure and membrane tension.

The contractile vacuoles of Naegleria respond differently to environmental changes than those of Dictyostelium

Cells typically modulate their contractile vacuole dynamics based on environmental conditions.6, 55, 61, 68-71 Although we typically grow Naegleria in the lab at 28 °C in a standard medium, in the wild, Naegleria experience a wide range of environmental conditions and must adapt to ambient pond temperatures and osmolarities. To determine how Naegleria contractile vacuole dynamics change under varying environmental conditions, we imaged Naegleria at two temperatures (20 °C and 35 °C) and two osmolarities (0 mOsm and 50 mOsm) using sorbitol—a non-metabolizable sugar used to increase osmolarity7, 61 (Note: the concentration of sorbitol in mM matches its osmolarity in mOsm). We then quantified the frequency of expulsion events from the largest recurring bladder (pumping rate of main contractile vacuole) and the largest bladder size (maximum CV area) for each of ten cells in five independent experiments (Figure 2A). The pumping rate more than doubled at the higher temperature, regardless of external osmolarity: at 20 °C, contractile vacuoles pumped at an average of 0.9 pumps/min in both 0 and 50 mM sorbitol, while at 35 °C, contractile vacuoles pumped at 2.0 pumps/min in both osmolarities (p=1.1E-9 at 0 mM, p=2.2E-9 at 50 mM). These rates are within the previously reported range of 0.3-2.4 pumps per minute.8, 62 Although pumping frequency did not vary with osmolarity, the maximum size of the bladder did: contractile vacuoles were over 3 times larger in 0 mM sorbitol than in 50 mM sorbitol (45.9 vs. 14.5 μm2 at 20 °C, p=4.7E-8 and 61.8 vs. 17.8 μm2 at 35 °C, p=3E-10). At 35 °C, the vacuoles in 0 (but not 50) mM sorbitol were significantly larger than at 20 °C (p=2.3E-4). To determine the extent to which Naegleria can respond to external osmolarity by altering contractile vacuole size but not pumping rate, we repeated these experiments under an extended range of osmolarities, from 0 to 100 mM sorbitol at room temperature (Figure 2B). We found a similar result: the maximum size decreased from 54.5 μm2 in 0 mM sorbitol to 7.7 μm2 in 100 mM sorbitol (p=2.1E-6), while the pumping rate did not vary significantly (a high of 1.2 pumps/min was measured in 25 mM sorbitol, and a low of 0.9 pumps/min was measured in 100 mM sorbitol). Together, these data indicate that, while Naegleria contractile vacuoles respond to temperature primarily by modulating pumping rate, they respond to osmolarity by modulating bladder size.

Figure 2. The contractile vacuoles of Naegleria respond differently to environmental changes than those of Dictyostelium.

Figure 2.

(A) Cells were incubated in water or 50 mM sorbitol, and imaged at low (20+/−1 °C) or high (35+/−1 °C) temperatures. The images show one example cell for each condition with one contractile vacuole bladder outlined in purple for each cell. Contractile vacuoles were quantified to determine the pumping rate of the main bladder (top), as well as the largest contractile vacuole bladder per cell (bottom). Each small gray symbol represents a single cell (10 cells per experiment), while larger symbols represent experiment-level averages for 5 replicates, with symbols coordinated by experiment, and the representative cells in purple. (B) Cells were treated with water or the indicated concentrations of sorbitol and imaged as in A, but at room temperature. The pumping rate (top) and maximum contractile vacuole area (bottom) were quantified as in A, with 5 cells per experimental replicate. (C) N. gruberi cells were exposed to water or the indicated concentration of sorbitol, and imaged. Top panels show example cells with insets magnified at 1.5X. Bottom graphs show the maximum contractile vacuole area for each pumping event (left, violin plot) or cell (center, SuperPlot), and the number of pumping events per minute (right, SuperPlot). The violin plot shows the pooled values for 5 experimental replicates, with white lines indicating the median and quartiles (also see Figure S3). In the SuperPlots, each small gray symbol represents a single cell (5 cells per experiment), while larger symbols represent experiment-level averages for 5 replicates, with symbols coordinated by experiment. The two example cells are highlighted in blue. (D) D. discoideum cells were exposed to water or the indicated concentration of sorbitol, and imaged and quantified as in A.

See also Figure S3.

Our finding that Naegleria maintains a constant contractile vacuole pumping rate under different osmolarities contrasts with Dictyostelium discoideum, which has been reported to increase pumping activity as a response to hypo-osmotic stress.55 To confirm this difference, we directly compared the contractile vacuole networks of Naegleria and Dictyostelium in side-by-side experiments. We measured every pumping event in both cell types across a range of sorbitol concentrations (Figure 2C-D, Figure S3). Both Naegleria and Dictyostelium cells formed larger vacuoles at lower concentrations of sorbitol as measured by area (Figure 2) as well as when quantified as the percent of the cell’s area (Figure S3 A-B). The average maximum vacuole size per cell for Naegleria was 43.0 μm2 in 0 mM sorbitol and 7.0 μm2 in 100 mM sorbitol (p=3.9E-11), while those of Dictyostelium ranged from 9.7 μm2 in 0 mM sorbitol to only 2.6 μm2 in 100 mM sorbitol (p=5.1E-6). Unlike Naegleria cells, which maintained a pumping rate of 1.0-1.1 pumps/min across sorbitol concentrations, Dictyostelium cells had a higher pumping rate at lower concentrations of sorbitol (2.2 pumps/min at 0 mM, 1.9 at 12.5 mM, 1.7 at 25 mM, 0.9 at 50 mM, and 0.4 at 100 mM sorbitol). Collectively, these data show that while both amoebae adjust vacuole size to account for osmolarity, only Dictyostelium pumps more frequently when under higher hypo-osmotic stress.

Actin is involved in Naegleria osmoregulation, but is not required for contractile vacuole pumping

To probe the mechanism of contractile vacuole emptying, we first considered tubulation, but quickly ruled this out as Naegleria contractile vacuoles do not appear to form tubules (Figure 1B). Because actin networks have also been hypothesized to drive contractile vacuole pumping in Acanthamoeba,2 we next searched for actin polymers at Naegleria contractile vacuoles in samples subjected to quick-freeze deep-etch electron microscopy. Although we did observe actin filaments at the cell cortex, we did not observe any actin filaments at contractile vacuole membranes (Figure 3A), a similar result to what has been described for Dictyostelium.16 Although the lack of actin at contractile vacuoles strongly suggests that actin network contraction cannot drive water expulsion from contractile vacuoles, it is possible that actin assembly is transient and difficult to detect using electron microscopy. Therefore, we treated cells with 5 μM Latrunculin B (LatB)—which results in global actin depolymerization72, 73 (Figure S4A)—and measured contractile vacuole activity. Strikingly, this treatment did not eliminate contractile vacuole pumping (Figure 3B, Video S3). The ability of these vacuoles to continue pumping in the absence of actin filaments is incompatible with the actomyosin contractility hypothesis that relies on the existence of an actin network.

Figure 3. Actin is involved in osmoregulation but is not required for contractile vacuole pumping events.

Figure 3.

(A) N. gruberi cells (strain NEG) were subjected to Quick-Freeze Deep-Etch Electron Microscopy. Representative contractile vacuoles and a section of the actin cortex are shown. (B) N. gruberi cells were incubated in water with small molecules and controls (5 μM Latrunculin B (LatB), 50 μM CK-666, 50 μM CK-689, or 0.1% DMSO) for ~20 min, then imaged for 15 min. Each contractile vacuole bladder was measured at its maximum size, and the cumulative contractile vacuole area was calculated over the imaging time. Left panels show examples of pumping events when the largest contractile vacuole was present (dashed outline; time is in min:s after imaging began). Middle panels show the cumulative area pumped out of the cell for 25 cells: 5 cells each from 5 experiments, with example cells from the left highlighted in magenta. Right panels show the area pumped per minute, the total number of pumping events per minute, the number of pumping events above a threshold of 20 μm2 per minute, and the maximum contractile vacuole area for each cell. Each small gray symbol represents a single cell (5 cells per experiment), while larger symbols represent experiment-level averages for 5 replicates, with symbols coordinated by experiment. The example cells are highlighted in magenta. (C) D. discoideum cells were incubated in water and treated with 5 μM LatB or 0.1% DMSO (vehicle control), and imaged and quantified as in A. The average area pumped per minute, the total number of pumping events per minute, and the maximum contractile vacuole area for each cell are shown. See Figure S4B for additional inhibitors. (D) A D. discoideum cell expressing a fluorescently-labeled actin-binding protein (RFP-LimE) is shown through a pumping cycle. Line scans bisecting a contractile vacuole show no enrichment of actin around the pumping bladder. See Figure S4C for an additional example.

See also Figure S4, and Videos S3-S4.

Although Naegleria contractile vacuoles clearly do not require actin to pump, cells treated with actin inhibitors do have defects in osmoregulation. To quantify these defects, we estimated the volume of water expelled over time by summing the maximum bladder sizes from each pumping event (Figure 3B). Treating cells with LatB resulted in a ~65% reduction in water pumped compared to a DMSO carrier control (as measured by contractile vacuole area pumped over time: 24.4 μm2/min vs. 69.8 μm2/min, p=2.0E-4). To explore the nature of this defect, we treated cells with 50 μM CK-666, which inhibits the Arp2/3 complex to specifically block branched actin network assembly.74, 75 This resulted in ~23% drop in water pumped out that was not statistically significant compared to the inactive control CK-689 (44.5 μm2/min vs. 57.8 μm2). These differences must be due to changes in contractile vacuole numbers, sizes, and/or pumping rates. We therefore quantified each parameter and found that compared to DMSO-treated cells, LatB-treated cells have fewer pumping events per minute (5.0 pumps/min for DMSO and 1.7 pumps/min for LatB, p=1.6E-3)—a difference that is exacerbated when looking only at large (>20 μm2) pumping events, which were relatively rare in LatB-treated cells (1.1 pumps/min for DMSO and 0.3 pumps/min for LatB, p=3.1E-6). Meanwhile, although CK-666-treated cells had fewer large pumping events than control cells (0.5 pumps/min for CK-666 vs. 1.0 pumps/min for CK-689, p=1.1E-3), these included some of the largest pumping events observed in this study, with some topping 200 μm2. These results show that, although not required for contractile vacuole pumping, actin is important for osmoregulation and the reformation of large vacuoles. This may be due to a requirement for cortical actin to prevent loss of contractile vacuole membranes to the plasma membrane, similar to what has been described for Dictyostelium.30

Actin networks are also dispensable for Dictyostelium contractile vacuole emptying

The lack of visible actin polymers around Dictyostelium contractile vacuoles in deep-etch electron micrographs16 suggests that Dictyostelium contractile vacuoles may also empty using an actomyosin-independent mechanism. We therefore directly tested the requirement for actin polymers in Dictyostelium contractile vacuole pumping by treating cells with LatB. Similar to Naegleria, depolymerizing Dictyostelium actin76 did not eliminate contractile vacuole pumping (Figure 3C, Figure S4B). As a final test of the actomyosin contractility hypothesis, we imaged cells transfected with RFP-LimE, a probe for polymerized actin. While contractile vacuoles were readily observed as voids that routinely grew and shrank, there was no detectable enrichment of actin at these sites as vacuoles filled or emptied (Figure 3D, Figure S4C, Video S4). The Latrunculin data and this live imaging support an actin-independent mechanism for contractile vacuole emptying.

Although actin is not required for expulsion events, the cytoskeleton of Dictyostelium has been implicated in osmoregulation. Dictyostelium contractile vacuoles use microtubules to traffic through the cell, and a type V myosin to engage the actin cortex.48 We therefore directly tested the role of cytoskeletal polymers in Dictyostelium osmoregulation by treating cells with a panel of actin and microtubule inhibitors (Figure S4B). Consistent with a role for the cytoskeleton in contractile vacuole membrane trafficking, LatB-treated cells expelled ~67% less water compared to controls, while CK-666-treated cells pumped out ~45% less, and nocodazole-treated cells pumped out ~36% less water (DMSO: 17.4 μm2/min; LatB: 5.7 μm2/min, p=1.0E-4; CK-666: 9.6 μm2/min, p=5.2E-3; nocodazole: 11.1 μm2/min, p=2.6E-2). Taken together, these data show that, like Naegleria, Dictyostelium uses actin for osmoregulation but not to drive water expulsion from the contractile vacuole.

Biophysical modeling suggests that cytoplasmic pressure is sufficient to power water expulsion from Naegleria and Dictyostelium contractile vacuoles

Having ruled out actomyosin-mediated contraction, we next explored other mechanisms that could explain the rapid emptying of Naegleria and Dictyostelium contractile vacuoles. Physical models of fluid expulsion from Paramecium multimicronucleatum contractile vacuoles have suggested that cytoplasmic pressure alone can provide sufficient force to empty the contents of a vacuole within seconds.7 We therefore wondered whether cytoplasmic pressure could also be driving vacuole emptying in Naegleria and/or Dictyostelium. To test this possibility, we developed a biophysical model of the emptying process (Figure 4A, Methods S1). Our model extends the previous Paramecium work7 to predict contractile vacuole dynamics for cells under confinement. Here, we define cytoplasmic pressure as the pressure on the cell periphery due to high intracellular concentrations of ions, osmolytes, and macromolecules. This pressure is a combination of both osmotic and oncotic (crowding) pressure.77 Under this model, we assume all of the contents of the vacuole exit through a pore of defined size (Figure 4A). Flow through this pore is driven by the pressure difference on either side of the pore, meaning that increasing cytoplasmic pressure increases the emptying rate. The pore itself resists flow, such that having a longer, thinner pore reduces the emptying rate. The major prediction of the cytoplasmic pressure model is that the rate of vacuole expulsion is constant in time, meaning the cross-sectional area decreases linearly (Figure 4A). To test this prediction, we measured Naegleria and Dictyostelium contractile vacuole areas through expulsion events. In both species, the cross-sectional area decreased linearly with time (Figure 4B-C), consistent with our cytoplasmic pressure model.

Figure 4. A biophysical model of cytoplasmic pressure-driven contractile vacuole emptying is consistent with contractile vacuole expulsion rates measured in Naegleria and Dictyostelium.

Figure 4.

(A) Schematic of the model. Top: A view of the cell from above. The contractile vacuole (darker circle) is treated as a cylinder sitting inside of a cylindrical cell (lighter circle). Middle: A side view of a cell. The contractile vacuole has a diameter, DV, and a height, H, which is equal to the height of the cell. Cytoplasmic pressure, denoted PC, squeezes water out of the contractile vacuole through a pore. The pressure inside the vacuole is assumed to be equal to the cytoplasmic pressure. As water exits through the pore, the diameter of the contractile vacuole begins to shrink while the height of the contractile vacuole remains constant. Inset: A side-view of the pore with diameter DP and width LP. Bottom: An equation describing the reduction in the contractile vacuole cross-sectional area, A, over time, t, as water leaves the vacuole through the pore. The contractile vacuole area is described as a function of the initial vacuole area A0, the area of the pore AP, the pressure difference across the pore (PC - PO), the viscosity of water η, the length of the pore LP, and the height of the contractile vacuole, H. (B) N. gruberi amoebae were imaged at a rate of 0.11 s/frame, and vacuole area was measured for each frame during expulsion. Periods of rapid expulsion were isolated using a threshold of 14 μm2/s, and the first time point when rapid expulsion occurred was set to 0. Vacuoles with expulsions lasting for at least 5 consecutive timepoints were analyzed. On the plot of contractile vacuole area over time (left), each point represents the area of the contractile vacuole bladder (n=4 vacuoles from 4 different cells), and the linear regression trendline and R2 values are shown. The residual plot (right) is shown to demonstrate the suitability of the linear model. (C) The contractile vacuoles of D. discoideum cells were imaged at a rate of 0.25 s/frame and quantified as in B, but with a threshold of 4.9 μm2/s. (D) The graph (left) displays parameters for the cytoplasmic pressure model that allow the contractile vacuole to dispense its entire volume in 1 s. The required pore diameter is plotted as a function of the choice of pore width, given a cytoplasmic pressure of 10 Pa (solid line), 100 Pa (dashed line), or 1000 Pa (dotted line). Any reasonable choice of cytoplasmic pressure in between 10 and 1000 Pa (blue shading) allows for a wide range of possible pore diameters and pore depths. The table (right) shows the allowable parameters for cytoplasmic pressure78 and vacuole and pore geometry. The width of the pore was estimated to be larger than the thickness of the membrane but smaller than the typical z-resolution for light microscopy. The pore diameter was derived such that the expulsion time = 1 s (See Methods S1).

To function, contractile vacuoles must expel their contents faster than the rate at which water enters the cell. Consistent with this idea, contractile vacuoles in Naegleria and Dictyostelium, like Paramecium7, expel their contents in ~1 second (Figure 4B-C). In our model, expulsion rates depend on cytoplasmic pressure and the geometry of the pore that connects the contractile vacuole to the extracellular space. Because these properties vary widely across cell types, species, and environmental conditions (e.g. 78), we therefore calculated the expulsion rate for a wide range of biologically-relevant cytoplasmic pressures and pore geometries. We found that cytoplasmic pressure is sufficient to expel the entire contents of a contractile vacuole within one second for cytoplasmic pressures ranging from 10-1000 Pa, as well as pore sizes ranging from 10-1000 nm (Figure 4D). Taken together, these analyses show that cytoplasmic pressure is a plausible mechanism for the rapid expulsion of water from contractile vacuoles that is robust to variations in cell pressure and contractile vacuole morphology.

DISCUSSION

Osmoregulation is critical for cell survival and must be tightly controlled. Here, we show that Naegleria and Dictyostelium amoebae osmoregulate using contractile vacuole networks that respond to environmental changes. We also show that, like other species, Naegleria use vacuolar-type proton pumps for contractile vacuole filling. We confirm that although actin plays roles in osmoregulation, it is dispensable for expelling water from contractile vacuoles of both Naegleria and Dictyostelium. Instead, our analyses indicate that cytoplasmic pressure is sufficient for this process, similar to findings from the alveolate Paramecium multimicronucleatum.7 Together, these data reveal simple, conserved mechanisms that underlie contractile vacuole filling and emptying in diverse eukaryotic species with diverse contractile vacuole morphologies.

Our detailed quantification of contractile vacuole pumping shows that once Naegleria bladders begin to empty, they do not again swell until the next pump cycle, suggesting that water may no longer be flowing into these compartments. This raises the possibility that cytosolic water concentration could spike during pumping events. This possibility is ameliorated by a key feature of Naegleria’s contractile vacuole network—a division of labor: when one contractile vacuole bladder is pumping water out of the cell, other vacuoles are filling. This asynchronous activity allows for constant water flow out of the cytosol, a potentially conserved feature. For example, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has two bladders that take turns,79 and Paramecium has canals that continue to fill while the bladder empties, and has two contractile vacuole networks that alternate.25

Exploring the responses of contractile vacuoles to environmental changes also reveals new directions for future research. Similar to other species,68-70 Naegleria’s contractile vacuoles pump more frequently at higher temperatures, a finding that is consistent with the hypothesis that the historical increase in reported pumping rates of Naegleria contractile vacuoles may be due to improvements in laboratory heating.80 Unlike other protists,6, 55, 69 however, Naegleria maintains a constant contractile vacuole pumping rate in different osmotic environments. In side-by-side comparisons, Dictyostelium quintupled its pumping rate in water compared to 100 mM sorbitol, while Naegleria continued to pump about once per minute in both solutions. This raises an obvious question: how does Naegleria maintain a constant contractile vacuole pumping rate? One possible answer may lie in work from Paramecium that showed regular membrane tensing of surgically-removed contractile vacuoles,81, 82 hinting at the existence of a membrane-associated cycling activity. At the molecular scale, pump frequency may be regulated by ion channels, which are critical for pacemaking activity in cardiac and neuronal cells.83-85 Alternatively, the initiation of expulsion events may be controlled by activation of SNARE proteins, which have been implicated in Dictyostelium58 and Trypanosome22 contractile vacuole membrane trafficking, and which are encoded in the Naegleria genome.86

Although not required for pumping, actin networks do contribute to osmoregulation, as the contractile vacuoles of Latrunculin-treated cells expelled 65% less water in Naegleria and 67% less in Dictyostelium compared to controls. This defect could be due to impaired contractile vacuole membrane trafficking,48 potentially combined with differences in actin networks at pore sites. Supporting this idea, Dictyostelium actin and MyoJ regulate contractile vacuole membrane movement and tubulation at the cell cortex.48 Moreover, the actin mesh that surrounds the pore in Dictyostelium cells prevents proton pumps and the contractile vacuole membrane from being lost to the plasma membrane.30 Without an actin cortex, contractile vacuole membranes may completely fuse with the plasma membrane, thereby reducing the available volume of the contractile vacuole network and reducing total water output. On the other hand, having too much actin may also impede osmoregulation. CK-666 treatment—which results in a thicker actin cortex in Naegleria cells73—could block the contractile vacuole from contacting the plasma membrane, again reducing total water output. This would also explain the slower pumping rate and large contractile vacuole bladders we observed upon treating Naegleria with CK-666 (Figure 3B). Because the cytoskeleton regulates overall cell morphology, which differs greatly between amoebae and ciliates, the potential role for actin in regulating contractile vacuole pores may not apply to non-amoeboid species like Paramecium.

While our data confirm previous descriptions of Naegleria contractile vacuole dynamics,8, 49, 62 they refute previous hypotheses of how contractile vacuoles pump. Firstly, the lack of tubules in Naegleria contractile vacuole networks makes it unlikely that membrane tubulation drives contractile vacuole emptying, at least in this species. Secondly, despite the popularity of the actomyosin contractility hypothesis in the literature,2, 13, 35-38, 87 we and others failed to observe actin around active contractile vacuole bladders in any species,16, 88-91 and disassembly of all actin networks in Naegleria and Dictyostelium failed to halt water expulsion. Furthermore, analytical modeling of this mechanism is unable to explain the dynamics of contractile vacuole emptying in Paramecium.7 These data do, however, fit the cytoplasmic pressure model,7 as do our biophysical modeling of expulsion events in Naegleria and Dictyostelium. Therefore, a pressure differential is sufficient to drive contractile vacuole emptying in Naegleria, Dictyostelium, and Paramecium, despite the differences in their contractile vacuole morphology. Together, our results indicate that cytoplasmic pressure-based expulsion is a robust mechanism that can work under wide ranges of cytoplasmic pressure and pore geometries. Cytoplasmic pressure therefore represents an emptying mechanism which should be successful across diverse cell types.

Based on these data, we propose that there are only three requirements for pressure-driven contractile vacuole systems: (1) a membrane-bound vacuole that can connect to the cell exterior, (2) a system for transporting water into the vacuole, and (3) cytoplasmic pressure that can push on the contractile vacuole membrane. The simplicity of this system raises the possibility that contractile vacuole networks may be even more widely distributed amongst eukaryotic phyla than is currently appreciated. We now know that cytoplasmic pressure is sufficient to drive contractile vacuole emptying in at least three eukaryotic lineages that diverged from each other over a billion years ago, suggesting that this may represent an ancestral eukaryotic mechanism for regulating intracellular osmolarity.

STAR METHODS

RESOURCE AVAILABILITY

Lead Contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Lillian Fritz-Laylin (lfritzlaylin@umass.edu).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new, unique reagents.

Data and code availability

All data are available in the figures, tables, and supplemental files associated with this manuscript. All original code has been deposited at Zenodo and is publicly available; the DOI is listed in the key resources table. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

KEY RESOURCES TABLE

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant Proteins
Low-melt agarose Affymetrix Cat#32830 25 GM
Sorbitol Sigma Aldrich Cat#S1876-500G
Latrunculin B Abcam Cat#ab144291
CK-666 Calbiochem/Sigma Aldrich Cat#182515
CK-689 Calbiochem/Sigma Aldrich Cat#182517
DMSO Sigma Aldrich Cat#D2650-5x5ML
Nocodazole Sigma Aldrich Cat#M1404
Bafilomycin A1 Sigma Aldrich Cat#19-148
FM 4-64 Dye Invitrogen Cat#T13320
Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin Thermo Fisher Cat#A12379
Deposited Data
Pfam-A database (v35.0) 95 RRID:SCR_004726
JGI genome portal (N. gruberi proteins Naegr1_best_proteins.fasta) 86 RRID:SCR_002383
Experimental Models: Cell Lines
Naegleria gruberi strain NEG-M Chandler Fulton ATCC30224
Dictyostelium discoideum strain Ax2-ME (cloned and expanded from strain AX2-RRK) Dictybase stock center DBS0235521
Recombinant DNA
RFP-LimE plasmid Dictybase.org 475
Software and Algorithms
NIS Elements with Advanced Research Package Nikon Instruments RRID:SCR_014329
Fiji 94 RRID:SCR_002285
GraphPad Prism v9 GraphPad RRID:SCR_002798
Custom code This work Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8034763)

EXPERIMENTAL MODEL DETAILS

Naegleria gruberi

Naegleria gruberi cells (strain NEG-M, a gift from Dr. Chandler Fulton) were cultured axenically in M7 Media (10% FBS + 45 mg/L L-methionine + 5 g/L yeast extract + 5.4 g/L glucose + 2% (v/v) M7 Buffer (18.1 g/L KH2PO4 + 25 g/L Na2HPO4), made with deionized water further purified using a Milli-Q IQ 7000 water purification system that produces water of 18.2 MΩ.cm) in plug seal tissue culture-treated flasks (CELLTREAT; cat. no. 229330) and grown at 28°C. Cells were split into fresh media every 2-3 days for a maximum of 30 passages. Naegleria gruberi strain NEG was used for Quick-Freeze Deep-Etch Electron microscopy and grown on lawns of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria as previously described.80

Dictyostelium discoideum

Dictyostelium discoideum cells (strain Ax2-ME, cloned and expanded from AX2-RRK DBS0235521 obtained from the Dictybase stock center)92 were grown axenically in HL5 Media (14g/L peptone + 7g/L yeast extract + 13.5 g/L glucose + 0.5g/L KH2PO4 + 0.5g/L NA2HPO4) supplemented with streptomycin (300 μg/mL) and ampicillin (100 μg/mL) on tissue culture-treated plastic 100 mm or 150 mm plates (Fisherbrand Tissue Culture Dish) at 21 °C and maintained at 50% confluency by sub-culturing. For transformation and exogenous gene expression of the plasmid RFP-LimE (Dictybase.org), cells were electroporated as previously described.93 Briefly, cells were washed twice and resuspended in H-50 buffer (16.5mM HEPES, 50mM KCl, 10mM NaCl, 1mM MgSO4, 5mM NaHCO3, and 1mM NaH2PO4, pH 7). 5-6 million cells were transferred to a cold 0.1cm electroporation cuvette containing 2 μg of the plasmid and electroporated twice (0.85kV, 25μF) with a 5 s gap between pulses. Electroporated cells were maintained under selection in HL5 supplemented with 20μg/mL G418.

METHOD DETAILS

FM4-64 membrane staining

To visualize cell membranes (Figure 1B), ~3X105 NEG-M cells were seeded into a 6-well glass-bottom plate (Cellvis, P06-1.5H-N). FM 4-64 Dye (Invitrogen, T13320) was added to a final concentration of 50 μg/mL. A 1.5% agarose pad (without dye, see under agarose assays below) was overlaid, and the media/staining solution was aspirated off the cells. Cells were imaged in DIC and fluorescence using a single imaging plane, with images captured every 1.58 s for several pumping cycles (Figure 1), or with fluorescence only to capture the entire volume at intervals of 4.25 sec (Figure S1A). See the microscopy section for details.

Quantifying contractile vacuole area over time

~3X105 cells were seeded into a 6-well glass-bottom plate (Cellvis, P06-1.5H-N), rinsed with 1 mL of water (deionized water further purified using a Milli-Q IQ 7000 water purification system that produces water of 18.2 MΩ.cm), and confined under a 1.5% agarose pad (see under agarose assays below). Images were acquired every 250 ms, for multiple pumping cycles (see microscopy section for details). Pumping events were quantified in Fiji94 by outlining contractile vacuole bladders at their largest (using the wand tracing tool, or the freehand selection tool for less clear bladders), then measuring the vacuole size every 250 ms as it shrank until it was undetectable, and also working backward from the maximum size to measure the combined area of every smaller vacuole that fused to form that bladder every 2 s (Figure 1C). This information was used to color code the vacuoles by pump using Adobe Illustrator (Figure 1C) or Adobe Photoshop (Video S1B). A similar analysis was performed for Figure 1D, but with measurements every 250 ms.

To quantify contractile vacuole expulsion (Figure 4B-C), cells were treated as above and videos of N. gruberi were taken at a rate of 110 ms/frame, and videos of D. discoideum were taken at a rate of 250 ms/frame. 10 cells were quantified for each species; the area of the bladder was determined at its largest (using the wand tracing tool or freehand selection tool), and the vacuole area was measured in each frame until it was no longer detectable. Because contractile vacuoles sometimes pause during expulsion, periods of rapid expulsion were isolated for analysis using a threshold of 14 μm2/s for N. gruberi and 4.9 μm2/s for D. discoideum. Cells that had rapid expulsion events encompassing at least 5 data points were used to analyze the linearity of contractile vacuole area over time.

Homolog Identification

To identify N. gruberi v-ATPase subunit homologs, PFAM models corresponding to each of the 13 subunits were extracted from the Pfam-A database (v35.0)95 and used to search a curated list of predicted N. gruberi proteins (Naegr1_best_proteins.fasta available at https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/portal/Naegr1/Naegr1.download.ftp.html), using HMMER v3.3.2 with default gathering thresholds to filter matches. A BLASTP search was performed by comparing each of the resulting N. gruberi genes to proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain S288C (NCBI taxid: 559292) and Dictyostelium discoideum strain AX4 (NCBI taxid: 352472), using a word size of 3 and the BLOSUM45 scoring matrix, with all other settings set to their default. Only the top-scoring hit from each species was reported. The score for all reported hits was greater than 74 and the E-value was less than 1e-17. When running this BLASTP search, no significant hits were found matching the N. gruberi subunit G (JGI ID: 79649). This may be due to the small size of the protein and its low sequence complexity. A second BLASTP search was conducted for this protein removing the low complexity filter, which returned the reported hits, which had a score greater than 44 and an E-value less than 3e-7. A reciprocal BLASTP search, with the low-complexity filter applied using the S. cerevisiae homolog as bait, returned both N. gruberi and D. discoideum hits. The sequences were aligned with T-COFFEE using default settings and displayed with JalView, using the Clustal coloring scheme with a conservation threshold of 30. N. gruberi aquaporins were identified using HMMER, scanning the curated list of N. gruberi proteins for matches to the Major Intrinsic Protein PFAM model (PF00230) that passed default gathering thresholds. Examination of these matches with InterProScan only returned related domain predictions (e.g. transmembrane domains or aquaporin-like domains, IPR023271). A BLASTP search using the same settings described above was performed to return the closest matches in S. cerevisiae or D. discoideum, which had scores greater than 57 and E-values less than 2e-9.

Measuring contractile vacuole orientation

~1X105 N. gruberi cells were seeded into a 6-well glass-bottom plate (Cellvis, P06-1.5H-N), rinsed with 2 mL of water, and confined under a 1.5% agarose pad (see details on under agarose assays below). Cells were imaged at a rate of 1 frame/s for 5 min.

A semi-automated procedure was developed to quantify the contractile vacuole orientation across multiple cells over time. Briefly, phase contrast movies of sparsely seeded N. gruberi cells under agarose were manually contrast-adjusted, and the initial positions of cells were recorded manually. Cells were automatically segmented using an edge-detection filter and Otsu segmentation, followed by a watershed algorithm and refinement of the cell boundary using active contours. Cells were tracked in the process of segmentation using the centroids of cells in frame t – 1 as seeds for cell segmentation in frame t. Once cells were segmented and tracked, the centroid velocity was calculated from the total displacement over 5 frames. Contractile vacuole locations at the moment of pumping were identified manually using Fiji, and each pump was associated with the corresponding cell. The orientation of the contractile vacuole was then defined as the angle between the cell to contractile vacuole centroid-to-centroid vector and the cell centroid velocity vector, with the origin of both vectors at the cell centroid (Figure S1C). Custom code for these operations and the resulting windrose plot was written in Python v3.9.1 using scikit-image v0.19.3, pandas v1.4.4, SciPy v1.9.1, and numpy v1.23.2.96-98 Code is available on Github: https://github.com/fritzlaylinlab/contractile-vacuole-pressure.

Environmental perturbations under agarose

To assess the effects of temperature and sorbitol concentration on N. gruberi cells (Figure 2A), 1.5% agarose pads were prepared by microwaving low-melt agarose (Affymetrix, 32830 25 GM) in water or 50 mM sorbitol (Sigma, S1876-500G), and pipetting 1.5 mL of solution into wells of 6-well tissue culture treated plates (CellTreat, 229105). Agarose pads solidified at room temperature, and were then wrapped in parafilm and stored at 4 °C for up to 1 month. Prior to the start of an experiment, agarose pads were warmed to room temperature. To control the temperature, an air conditioning unit in the microscope room was turned on >1 h prior to the experiment to achieve a stable temperature of 20±1 °C for the colder condition, and a stage heater (okolab UNO stage top incubator) was set to 35 °C for the warmer condition. 3X105 - 5X105 Naegleria gruberi NEG-M cells (grown at room temperature overnight to prevent differentiation to flagellates) were seeded into each well of a fresh 6-well tissue culture plate and allowed to settle for ~5 min. For each well, media was aspirated, cells were rinsed with 2 mL of water, and then 1 mL of water or 50 mM sorbitol was added. Using a small scoopula, agarose pads with matching concentrations of sorbitol were loosened at the edges, and a wedge was removed, resulting in a pac-man shape. The agarose pad was transferred onto the cells, and the solution was pipetted out of the well from the mouth of the pac-man. Sample preparation was staggered such that each well was treated approximately 1 h before imaging. Cells were transitioned to the proper temperature at least 20 min prior to imaging, and imaged for 16 min with 2 s between images using phase contrast. Experiments shown in Figure 2B were performed similarly at room temperature (~24 °C), with the following exceptions: after seeding, cells were rinsed in 1 mL of 0-100 mM sorbitol, then 0.5 mL of 0-100 mM sorbitol were added prior to the addition of the agarose pad; cells were imaged after ~30 minutes of treatment; cells were imaged for 10 min total.

For Figure 2A-B, conditions were tested in a different order for each of 5 trials (although the 20 °C condition was always completed before the 35 °C condition), and file names were blinded prior to analysis. For each replicate, 10 cells (Figure 2A) or 5 cells (Figure 2B) from each condition were randomly selected from the initial field of view for analysis (cells were only reselected if they left the field of view or divided during the movie). The largest recurring vacuole in each cell (the “main contractile vacuole”) was analyzed by measuring its area at its largest point prior to the pump using the freehand selection tool and measure command in Fiji. The pumping rate (frequency) was calculated by dividing the number of pumps −1 by the time between the first collapse and the last fullest point. Data were analyzed and graphs were created using GraphPad Prism.

N. gruberi and D. discoideum under agarose

For the side-by-side comparisons of N. gruberi and D. discoideum (Figure 2C-D, Figure S3), 1.0% agarose pads in 12.5-100 mM sorbitol were prepared and stored as described above. Approximately 5X105 Naegleria gruberi NEG-M cells (grown at room temperature overnight to prevent differentiation to flagellates) or 1X106 Dictyostelium discoideum Ax2 cells were seeded into each well of a 6 well plate and allowed to settle. Media was aspirated from cells, and 1 mL of fresh media was added to each well prior to starting the experiment. For each well, media was aspirated, cells were rinsed with 2 mL followed by 1 mL of water or 12.5-100 mM sorbitol, and the agarose pad was transferred onto the cells as described above. 10 minutes were intentionally left between wells, to maintain a consistent timing of approximately 1 hour between exposure to water/sorbitol and imaging. Cells were imaged for 8 min with 2 s between images using phase contrast. Conditions were tested in a different order for each trial, and file names were blinded prior to analysis. For each replicate, 5 cells from each condition were randomly selected from the initial field of view for analysis (cells were only reselected if they left the field of view or divided during the movie). Every time a vacuole pumped (i.e. disappeared), the vacuole was measured at its largest point prior to the pump using the freehand selection and measure command in Fiji. Because every pumping event was measured (not only the main contractile vacuole as in Figure 2A-B), the pumping rate was calculated by dividing the total number of pumps by the length of the movie (8 min). Data were analyzed and graphs were created using GraphPad Prism.

Chemical inhibitors

Chemical inhibitor experiments (Figure 3B) were performed under agarose at room temperature as described above (see: Environmental perturbations under agarose), with the following modifications. When making 1.5% agarose pads, small molecule inhibitors and controls were incorporated for final concentrations of: 5 μM Latrunculin B (Abcam, ab144291); 50 μM CK-666 (Calbiochem/Sigma, 182515); 50 μM CK-689 (Calbiochem/Sigma, 182517); or 0.1% DMSO (Sigma, D2650-5x5ML). After media was aspirated from cells, 1 mL of water was used to rinse cells, and 1 mL of inhibitor or control solutions (diluted in water) was added. Cells were imaged by phase contrast, beginning ~20 minutes after the addition of the agarose pad, and for 15 minutes with 2 seconds between frames. 20 minutes were left between wells to stagger the imaging times. Images of D. discoideum were taken at a rate of 250 ms/frame. Cells were imaged under 1.5% agarose pads with inhibitors as described above (or using Nocodazole (Sigma, M1404) at 10 μg/ml). Experiments with Bafilomycin (Figure 1D, Figure S1D) were performed in a similar way with the following exceptions: 100 nM Bafilomycin A1 (Sigma, 19-148), 0.1% DMSO (Sigma, D2650-5x5ML), or 0.1% water were used in the 1.5% agarose pads and to make the inhibitor or control solutions; agarose pads and solutions were diluted into 10% M7 media instead of water; and cells were seeded into 6-well glass-bottom plates (Cellvis, P06-1.5H-N).

Actin staining of DMSO and Latrunculin-treated N. gruberi cells (Figure S4A) was performed live on the microscope using the OneStep fixing and staining protocol.99 Briefly, ~2X104 cells (in 150 μl of M7 media) were seeded into a 96-well glass bottom plate (dot scientific, MGB096-1-2-LG-L), and imaged using DIC. During imaging, cells were treated with 150 μl of 0.2% DMSO or 10 μM LatB (for final concentrations of 0.1% DMSO and 5 μM LatB). We verified that DMSO- and Latrunculin-treated cells continued to pump their contractile vacuoles. Then, 150 μl of solution was removed from the well and 150 μl of OneStep fixing and staining solution (100 mM sucrose, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 3.6% PFA, 0.025% NP-40, DAPI, and Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin: see 99 for additional details) were added. Imaging continued, adding in fluorescence to detect actin polymer and DNA. Once the staining had plateaued, a Z-stack was taken to encompass the thickness of the cells (step size: 0.6 μm, 40 slices). The images shown in Figure S4A are maximum intensity projections.

Microscopy

The experiments shown in Figure 1B, Figure 2A, and Figure S4A were performed using a Nikon eclipse Ti2, equipped with a Crest X-Light spinning disk (50 μm pinhole), a Photometrics Prime 95B camera, a Lumencor Celesta light source for fluorescence, controlled through NIS-Elements AR software. Images in Figure 1B and Figure S4A were taken in DIC (acquired using transmitted light) and Fluorescence (excitation wavelengths: 546 (FM4-64), 477 (Alexa fluor 488 Phalloidin), and 405 (DAPI); emission wavelengths: 620 (FM4-64), 535 (Alexa fluor 488 Phalloidin), and 460 (DAPI)) with a Plan Apo λ 100x 1.45 NA oil objective (Figure 1B) or a Plan Apo λ 40x 0.95 NA air objective (Figure S4A). Experiments shown in Figure 2A were performed without the spinning disk, using a ph2 40x S Plan Fluor 0.6 NA objective (with a correction collar set to 1.2).

The imaging completed for experiments shown in Figure 1C-D, Figure 2B-D, Figure 3B, Figure 4B, Figure S1B-C, Figure S2C, and Figure S1C were collected using a Nikon eclipse Ti2, equipped with a pco.panda sCMOS camera, external phase system, and controlled through NIS-Elements AR software. A Plan Apo λ 100x 1.45 NA oil objective was used for Figure 1C and Figure 4B, a Plan Fluor 40x 1.3 NA oil objective was used for Figure 1D, Figure S1C, and Figure S2C, and a ph2 40x S Plan Fluor 0.6 NA air objective (with a correction collar set to 1.2) was used for Figure 2B-D, Figure 3B, and Figure S1B.

Microscopy for Figure 4C was completed using Nikon eclipse Ti2 equipped with a Ds-QI2 cMOS camera, external phase, and Plan Apo 40x 1.2 NA oil objective, controlled through NIS-Elements AR software. Experiments in Figure 3D and Figure S4C were completed using a Zeiss 980 laser scanning confocal with AiryScan2 equipped with a Plan Apo 63x 1.4 NA oil objective, and controlled by ZEN Blue software.

Microscopy for Figure S1A was completed using a Zeiss Lattice Light Sheet 7 microscope equipped with 40X objectives with NAs of 1.0 and 0.44, an ORCA-Fusion Digital CMOS camera (C14440-20UP), and controlled by ZEN Blue software. FM4-64 staining was detected using an excitation wavelength of 561 nm and emission of 596.5 nm.

Line scans

The line scans shown in Figure 3D and Figure S4C were generated by drawing a line through a contractile vacuole and using the plot profile tool in Fiji. The same line was used for multiple frames, to determine the intensity along the line over time. The data were exported into GraphPad Prism to plot final graphs. Figure 3D used a line thickness of 5 pixels, those in Figure S4C used a line thickness of 10 pixels.

Quick-Freeze Deep-Etch Electron Microscopy

Amoebae were scraped from bacteria-seeded agar plates and quick-frozen using the Heuser-designed slammer/cryopress device.100, 101 The freezing, which occurs at liquid helium (−269°C, 4°K) temperatures, is sufficiently rapid that water is immobilized in its vitreous state and does not associate to form distorting ice crystals. The frozen samples were stored at −196°C (liquid N2) and transferred to an evacuated Balzers BAF 400 D Freeze Etching System (Balzers AG, Lichtenstein), cooled with liquid N2, for fracturing. Fracturing was followed by etching, during which the temperature is raised from −196°C to −100°C for two minutes, allowing a surface layer of frozen water to sublimate into the vacuum, and leaving behind cellular elements and macromolecules suspended in their physiological state. The temperature was then reduced, and a film of vaporized platinum (Pt) was deposited onto the fractured surface from an angle of 25°. The sample is rapidly rotated during the deposition process and hence exposed to the Pt stream from all directions. A thin film of carbon was then deposited to hold the Pt grains in place. Pt does not condense on the surface as a uniform and amorphous coat. Instead it forms small crystals, 10-20 Å in diameter, which migrate and clump together in various ways depending on the texture and composition of the surface. Hence the resultant replica is a high-resolution platinum cast which mimics the contours of the exposed sample. The replica was cleaned with chromosulfuric acid to remove biological material, generating a very thin film of Pt/C – the replica -- that was placed on a formvar-coated copper grid and viewed using the electron beam of a transmission electron microscope (JEOL model JEM 1400 (JEOL, Peabody, MA 01960)), equipped with an AMT (Advanced Microscopy Techniques, Woburn, MA 01801, USA) V601 digital camera.

Modeling contractile vacuole emptying

The cytosolic pressure model assumes that all of the contents of the vacuole exit through a single pore in the membrane. The pore is assumed to have constant radius and thickness throughout time. The fluid in the vacuole is assumed to be an incompressible Newtonian fluid (water) engaging in laminar flow through the pore. The flow through this pore is therefore determined by the Hagen–Poiseuille law for laminar flow through a cylinder: dVdt=γΔP. The pressure difference across the pore (i.e., between the inside of the vacuole and the extracellular space) forces fluid through the pore. The small size of the pore gives a resistance to fluid flow, defined by γ. For a cylindrical pore, γ=AP28πηLP, where AP and LP are the area and length of the pore, respectively, and η is the viscosity of the medium (Figure 4A). See the Methods S1 for a full derivation for the equation shown in Figure 4A.

Importantly, this model assumes the membrane is impermeable to water at short timescales, such that water can only leave through the pore. Water cannot leave or enter through the membrane itself. We can make this approximation because the rate of fluid flow through the vacuole membrane (e.g., the vacuole fill rate) is more than ten times slower than that of the fluid expulsion rate through the pore.

QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Experiments shown in Figure 1, 2, 3B and 3C were each performed at least 5 times. All data were analyzed using Graphpad Prism, and plotted as SuperPlots102 when possible. The number of cells quantified for each experiment is specified in the figure legends. For all comparisons that included more than two conditions, statistical significance between experiment-level averages was determined using ordinary one-way ANOVAs with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests to calculate p values. For experiments comparing two conditions, unpaired t-tests were used to determine significance between experiment-level averages. 0.05 was used as a cutoff for significance.

Supplementary Material

1

Methods S1. Modeling contractile vacuole filling and emptying. Related to Figure 4.

2
3

Video S1. Contractile vacuole networks in Naegleria comprise small vacuoles and large bladders, with multiple generations co-existing. Related to Figure 1. (A) An N. gruberi cell stained with the membrane dye FM4-64 cell shows a contractile vacuole pumping cycle. Frames from this movie were selected for Figure 1B. (B) A representative cell shows multiple contractile vacuole pumping cycles, with full bladders pseudocolored through their expulsion. Note the surrounding network of uncolored vacuoles grows as each pseudocolored bladder pumps. This movie was also used in Figure 1C.

Download video file (49.2MB, mp4)
4

Video S2. Naegleria contractile vacuole networks are dynamic. Related to Figure 1. (A) A representative contractile vacuole fusion event is shown, with initial contractile vacuoles fusing to form a single bladder at 3 min 34 s. The two networks that merge are indicated with pink asterisks, displayed for 2 frames prior to the start of the pump. The single merged bladder is indicated with a magenta asterisk. (B) A representative fission event is shown, where a single bladder (magenta asterisk) becomes smaller contractile vacuoles (green asterisks). (C) A cell with multiple large and small contractile vacuole networks is shown. The two largest systems are indicated with yellow and cyan asterisks. Cells in A and B were untreated control cells from the experiments shown in Figure S1D. Cells in C are from a control experiment shown in Figure 3B (DMSO-treated control).

Download video file (19.5MB, mp4)
5

Video S3. Latrunculin does not prevent contractile vacuole pumping events in Naegleria. Related to Figure 3. A representative video of N. gruberi cells treated with 5 μM LatB shows that contractile vacuole expulsion events are still common.

Download video file (28.5MB, mp4)
6

Video S4. Actin does not localize to Dictyostelium contractile vacuoles. Related to Figure 3. A representative video of an RFP-LimE-expressing D. discoideum cell (the same example shown in Figure 3D) shows no enrichment of actin at contractile vacuoles (highlighted with green asterisks).

Download video file (2.8MB, mp4)

Highlights:

  • Vacuolar-type proton pumps contribute to contractile vacuole filling in Naegleria.

  • Actin networks are dispensable for vacuole emptying in Naegleria and Dictyostelium.

  • Cytoplasmic pressure is sufficient to drive emptying in Naegleria and Dictyostelium.

  • Modeling shows pressure can drive emptying in a wide variety of cells.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Ursula Goodenough (Washington University) for providing Quick-Freeze Deep-Etch Electron Microscopy images of Naegleria cells, Dr. Chandler Fulton (Brandeis University) for providing NEG cells for Quick-Freeze Deep-Etch Electron Microscopy and the NEG-M cell line. We thank Dr. Nicholas Martin (University of California San Francisco) and Manuela Richter (University of California San Francisco) for important discussions and experiments during the Physiology Course at the Marine Biological Laboratory. We thank Dr. Chris Bjornsson and the Marine Biological Laboratory Central Microscopy Facility for assistance with lattice light sheet microscopy. We also thank Erik Kalinka for translating key sections of the reference (Schardinger, 1899) into English, and Dr. Sam Lord, Dr. Ken Campellone, Dr. Madelaine Bartlett, and Dr. Meg Titus for providing feedback on this work. This work was supported by: the National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F32AI150057 to K.B.V.; the National Institute of General Medical Science of the National Institutes of Health under award number K99GM147656 to K.B.V., award number F32GM148023 to A.S.K., and award number R35GM143039 to L.K.F.-L.; a Smith Family Foundation Award for Excellence in Biomedical Science to L.K.F.-L.; and The Pew Charitable Trusts (awarded to L.K.F.-L.). M.E. and M.W. were supported by the National Institute of General Medical Science of the National Institutes of Health under award number R15GM143733 (awarded to M.E.), and imaging completed by M.E. and M.W. was supported by The National Science Foundation, award number 2117798. R.M.G and C.L. were supported by The National Science Foundation Simons Center for Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Biology at Harvard (Award #1764269). L.K.F.-L. Is a fellow of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Fungal Kingdom Program.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS

The authors declare no competing interests.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Coppellotti O, Piccinni E, Colombetti G, and Leno F (1979). Responses of Euglena gracilis to Cytochalasins B and D. Italian Journal of Zoology 46, 71–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Doberstein SK, Baines IC, Wiegand G, Korn ED, and Pollard TD (1993). Inhibition of contractile vacuole function in vivo by antibodies against myosin-I. Nature 365, 841–843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Figarella K, Uzcategui NL, Zhou Y, LeFurgey A, Ouellette M, Bhattacharjee H, and Mukhopadhyay R (2007). Biochemical characterization of Leishmania major aquaglyceroporin LmAQP1: possible role in volume regulation and osmotaxis. Mol Microbiol 65, 1006–1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gabriel D, Hacker U, Köhler J, Müller-Taubenberger A, Schwartz J-M, Westphal M, and Gerisch G (1999). The contractile vacuole network of Dictyostelium as a distinct organelle: its dynamics visualized by a GFP marker protein. J Cell Science. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jimenez V, Miranda K, and Augusto I (2022). The old and the new about the contractile vacuole of Trypanosoma cruzi. J Eukaryot Microbiol, e12939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Komsic-Buchmann K, Wostehoff L, and Becker B (2014). The contractile vacuole as a key regulator of cellular water flow in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryot Cell 13, 1421–1430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Naitoh Y, Tominaga T, Ishida M, Fok A, Aihara M, and Allen R (1997). How does the contractile vacuole of Paramecium multimicronucleatum expel fluid? Modelling the expulsion mechanism. J Exp Biol 200, 713–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schardinger F. (1899). Entwicklungskreis eine Amoeba lobosa (gymnamoeba): Amoeba gruberi. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse 108, 713–734. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Toret C, Picco A, Boiero-Sanders M, Michelot A, and Kaksonen M (2022). The cellular slime mold Fonticula alba forms a dynamic, multicellular collective while feeding on bacteria. Curr Biol. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Troster V, Setzer T, Hirth T, Pecina A, Kortekamp A, and Nick P (2017). Probing the contractile vacuole as Achilles' heel of the biotrophic grapevine pathogen Plasmopara viticola. Protoplasma 254, 1887–1901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wigg D, Bovee EC, and Jahn TL (1967). The evacuation mechanism of the water expulsion vesicle ("contractile vacuole") of Amoeba proteus. J Protozool 14, 104–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Spallanzani L, and Bonnet C (1776). Opuscoli di fisica animale, e vegetabile dell'Abate Spallanzani, Regio Professore di Storia Naturale nell'Università di Pavia, socio delle Accademie di Londra de'Curiosi della Natura di Germania, di Berlino, Stockolm, Gottinga, Bologna, Siena, ec. : aggiuntevi alcune lettere relative, (In Modena: Presso la Società tipografica; ). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martin-Navarro CM, Lorenzo-Morales J, Lopez-Arencibia A, Reyes-Batlle M, Pinero JE, Valladares B, and Maciver SK (2014). Evaluation of Acanthamoeba myosin-IC as a potential therapeutic target. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 58, 2150–2155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Becker B, and Hickisch A (2005). Inhibition of contractile vacuole function by brefeldin A. Plant Cell Physiol 46, 201–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clarke M, Kohler J, Arana Q, Liu T, Heuser J, and Gerisch G (2002). Dynamics of the vacuolar H(+)-ATPase in the contractile vacuole complex and the endosomal pathway of Dictyostelium cells. Journal of Cell Science 115, 2893–2905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heuser J, Zhu Q, and Clarke M (1993). Proton pumps populate the contractile vacuoles of Dictyostelium amoebae. J Cell Biol 121, 311–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ishida M, Hori M, Ooba Y, Kinoshita M, Matsutani T, Naito M, Hagimoto T, Miyazaki K, Ueda S, Miura K, et al. (2021). A functional Aqp1 gene product localizes on the contractile vacuole complex in Paramecium multimicronucleatum. J Eukaryot Microbiol 68, e12843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Montalvetti A, Rohloff P, and Docampo R (2004). A functional aquaporin co-localizes with the vacuolar proton pyrophosphatase to acidocalcisomes and the contractile vacuole complex of Trypanosoma cruzi. J Biol Chem 279, 38673–38682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nishihara E, Yokota E, Tazaki A, Orii H, Katsuhara M, Kataoka K, Igarashi H, Moriyama Y, Shimmen T, and Sonobe S (2008). Presence of aquaporin and V-ATPase on the contractile vacuole of Amoeba proteus. Biology of the Cell 100, 179–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ruiz FA, Marchesini N, Seufferheld M, Govindjee, and Docampo R (2001). The polyphosphate bodies of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii possess a proton-pumping pyrophosphatase and are similar to acidocalcisomes. J Biol Chem 276, 46196–46203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stock C, Gronlien HK, Allen RD, and Naitoh Y (2002). Osmoregulation in Paramecium: in situ ion gradients permit water to cascade through the cytosol to the contractile vacuole. Journal of Cell Science 115, 2339–2348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ulrich PN, Jimenez V, Park M, Martins VP, Atwood J 3rd, Moles K, Collins D, Rohloff P, Tarleton R, Moreno SN, et al. (2011). Identification of contractile vacuole proteins in Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS One 6, e18013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rohloff P, Montalvetti A, and Docampo R (2004). Acidocalcisomes and the contractile vacuole complex are involved in osmoregulation in Trypanosoma cruzi. J Biol Chem 279, 52270–52281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Marchesini N, Ruiz FA, Vieira M, and Docampo R (2002). Acidocalcisomes are functionally linked to the contractile vacuole of Dictyostelium discoideum. J Biol Chem 277, 8146–8153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tani T, Tominaga T, Allen RD, and Naitoh Y (2002). Development of periodic tension in the contractile vacuole complex membrane of paramecium governs its membrane dynamics. Cell Biology International 26, 853–860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Young RA (1924). On the excretory apparatus in Paramecium. Science 60, 244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gerisch G, Heuser J, and Clarke M (2002). Tubular-vesicular transformation in the contractile vacuole system of Dictyostelium. Cell Biology International 26, 845–852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nishihara E, Shimmen T, and Sonobe S (2007). New aspects of membrane dynamics of Amoeba proteus contractile vacuole revealed by vital staining with FM 4-64. Protoplasma 231, 25–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McKanna JA (1973). Fine structure of the contractile vacuole pore in Paramecium. J Protozool 20, 631–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Heuser J. (2006). Evidence for recycling of contractile vacuole membrane during osmoregulation in Dictyostelium amoebae--a tribute to Gunther Gerisch. Eur J Cell Biol 85, 859–871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Docampo R, Jimenez V, Lander N, Li ZH, and Niyogi S (2013). New insights into roles of acidocalcisomes and contractile vacuole complex in osmoregulation in protists. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 305, 69–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gerald NJ, Siano M, and De Lozanne A (2002). The Dictyostelium LvsA protein is localized on the contractile vacuole and is required for osmoregulation. Traffic 3, 50–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Heath RJ, and Insall RH (2008). Dictyostelium MEGAPs: F-BAR domain proteins that regulate motility and membrane tubulation in contractile vacuoles. Journal of Cell Science 121, 1054–1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baines IC, Corigliano-Murphy A, and Korn ED (1995). Quantification and localization of phosphorylated myosin I isoforms in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Journal of Cell Biology 130, 591–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baines IC, and Korn ED (1990). Localization of myosin IC and myosin II in Acanthamoeba castellanii by indirect immunofluorescence and immunogold electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology 111, 1895–1904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kong HH, and Pollard TD (2002). Intracellular localization and dynamics of myosin-II and myosin-IC in live Acanthamoeba by transient transfection of EGFP fusion proteins. Journal of Cell Science 115, 4993–5002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yonemura S, and Pollard T (1992). The localization of myosin I and myosin II in Acanthamoeba by fluorescence microscopy. J Cell Science 102, 629–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bement WM, and Mooseker MS (1993). Keeping out the rain. Nature 365, 785–786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Betts HC, Puttick MN, Clark JW, Williams TA, Donoghue PCJ, and Pisani D (2018). Integrated genomic and fossil evidence illuminates life's early evolution and eukaryote origin. Nat Ecol Evol 2, 1556–1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Knoll AH (2014). Paleobiological perspectives on early eukaryotic evolution. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Parfrey LW, Lahr DJ, Knoll AH, and Katz LA (2011). Estimating the timing of early eukaryotic diversification with multigene molecular clocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, 13624–13629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chung S, Cho J, Cheon H, Paik S, and Lee J (2002). Cloning and characterization of a divergent alpha-tubulin that is expressed specifically in dividing amebae of Naegleria gruberi. Gene 293, 77–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fulton C, and Dingle AD (1971). Basal bodies, but not centrioles, in Naegleria. J Cell Biol 51, 826–836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee JH, and Walsh CJ (1988). Transcriptional regulation of coordinate changes in flagellar mRNAs during differentiation of Naegleria gruberi amebae into flagellates. Mol Cell Biol 8, 2280–2287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Velle KB, Kennard AS, Trupinic M, Ivec A, Swafford AJM, Nolton E, Rice LM, Tolic IM, Fritz-Laylin LK, and Wadsworth P (2022). Naegleria's mitotic spindles are built from unique tubulins and highlight core spindle features. Curr Biol. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Walsh CJ (2012). The structure of the mitotic spindle and nucleolus during mitosis in the amebo-flagellate Naegleria. PLoS One 7, e34763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Walsh CJ (2007). The role of actin, actomyosin and microtubules in defining cell shape during the differentiation of Naegleria amebae into flagellates. Eur J Cell Biol 86, 85–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jung G, Titus MA, and Hammer JA 3rd (2009). The Dictyostelium type V myosin MyoJ is responsible for the cortical association and motility of contractile vacuole membranes. Journal of Cell Biology 186, 555–570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wilson CW (1916). On the life history of a soil amoeba. University of California Press, 241–292. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Siddiqui R, Ali IKM, Cope JR, and Khan NA (2016). Biology and pathogenesis of Naegleria fowleri. Acta Trop 164, 375–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Goldberg NB, Sawinski VJ, and Goldberg AF (1965). Human cerebrospinal fluid osmolality at 37-degree C. Anesthesiology 26, 829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Albers T, Maniak M, Beitz E, and von Bülow J (2016). The C isoform of Dictyostelium tetraspanins localizes to the contractile vacuole and contributes to resistance against osmotic stress. PLoS One 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Becker M, Matzner M, and Gerisch G (1999). Drainin required for membrane fusion of the contractile vacuole in Dictyostelium is the prototype of a protein family also represented in man. EMBO J 18, 3305–3316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Clarke M, Maddera L, Engel U, and Gerisch G (2010). Retrieval of the vacuolar H-ATPase from phagosomes revealed by live cell imaging. PLoS One 5, e8585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Du F, Edwards K, Shen Z, Sun B, De Lozanne A, Briggs S, and Firtel RA (2008). Regulation of contractile vacuole formation and activity in Dictyostelium. EMBO J 27, 2064–2076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Essid M, Gopaldass N, Yoshida K, Merrifield C, and Soldati T (2012). Rab8a regulates the exocyst-mediated kiss-and-run discharge of the Dictyostelium contractile vacuole. Mol Biol Cell 23, 1267–1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Malchow D, Lusche DF, Schlatterer C, De Lozanne A, and Muller-Taubenberger A (2006). The contractile vacuole in Ca2+-regulation in Dictyostelium: its essential function for cAMP-induced Ca2+-influx. BMC Developmental Biology 6, 31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Manna PT, Barlow LD, Ramirez-Macias I, Herman EK, and Dacks JB (2023). Endosomal vesicle fusion machinery is involved with the contractile vacuole in Dictyostelium discoideum. Journal of Cell Science 136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Maringer K, Yarbrough A, Sims-Lucas S, Saheb E, Jawed S, and Bush J (2016). Dictyostelium discoideum RabS and Rab2 colocalize with the Golgi and contractile vacuole system and regulate osmoregulation. J Biosci 41, 205–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nolta KV, and Steck TL (1994). Isolation and initial characterization of the bipartite contractile vacuole complex from Dictyostelium discoideum. J Biol Chem 269, 2225–2233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhu Q, and Clarke M (1992). Association of calmodulin and an unconventional myosin with the contractile vacuole complex of Dictyostelium discoideum. Journal of Cell Biology 118, 347–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Page FC (1967). Taxonomic Criteria for Limax Amoebae, with Descriptions of 3 New Species of Hartmannella and 3 of Vahlkampfia. J Protozool 14, 499–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fok AK, Aihara MS, Ishida M, Nolta KV, Steck TL, and Allen RD (1995). The pegs on the decorated tubules of the contractile vacuole complex of Paramecium are proton pumps. Journal of Cell Science 108 (Pt 10), 3163–3170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bowman EJ, Siebers A, and Altendork K (1988). Bafilomycins: A class of inhibitors of membrane ATPases from microorganisms, animal cells, and plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85, 7972–7976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Crider BP, Xie XS, and Stone DK (1994). Bafilomycin inhibits proton flow through the H+ channel of vacuolar proton pumps. J Biol Chem 269, 17379–17381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dai J, Ting-Beall HP, Hochmuth RM, Sheetz MP, and Titus MA (1999). Myosin I contributes to the generation of resting cortical tension. Biophysical Journal 77, 1168–1176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Manoussaki D, Shin WD, Waterman CM, and Chadwick RS (2015). Cytosolic pressure provides a propulsive force comparable to actin polymerization during lamellipod protrusion. Sci Rep 5, 12314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cole WH (1925). Pulsation of the contractile vacuole of Paramecium as affected by temperature. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kitching JA (1948). The physiology of contractile vacuoles; temperature and osmotic stress. J Exp Biol 25, 421–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nematbakhsh S, and Bergquist BL (1993). Periodicity and the influence of temperature and cellular size in contractile vacuole contraction intervals. T Am Microsc Soc 112, 292–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Stock C, Allen RD, and Naitoh Y (2001). How external osmolarity affects the activity of the contractile vacuole complex, the cytosolic osmolarity and the water permeability of the plasma membrane in Paramecium multimicronucleatum. J Exp Biol 204, 291–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Spector I, Shochet NR, Kashman Y, and Groweiss A (1983). Latrunculins: novel marine toxins that disrupt microfilament organization in cultured cells. Science 219, 493–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Velle KB, and Fritz-Laylin LK (2020). Conserved actin machinery drives microtubule-independent motility and phagocytosis in Naegleria. Journal of Cell Biology 219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hetrick B, Han MS, Helgeson LA, and Nolen BJ (2013). Small molecules CK-666 and CK-869 inhibit actin-related protein 2/3 complex by blocking an activating conformational change. Chem Biol 20, 701–712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nolen BJ, Tomasevic N, Russell A, Pierce DW, Jia Z, McCormick CD, Hartman J, Sakowicz R, and Pollard TD (2009). Characterization of two classes of small molecule inhibitors of Arp2/3 complex. Nature 460, 1031–1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gerisch G, Bretschneider T, Muller-Taubenberger A, Simmeth E, Ecke M, Diez S, and Anderson K (2004). Mobile actin clusters and traveling waves in cells recovering from actin depolymerization. Biophysical Journal 87, 3493–3503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mitchison TJ (2019). Colloid osmotic parameterization and measurement of subcellular crowding. Mol Biol Cell 30, 173–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Petrie RJ, and Koo H (2014). Direct measurement of intracellular pressure. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 63, 12 19 11–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Luykx P, Hoppenrath M, and Robinson DG (1997). Structure and behavior of contractile vacuoles in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Protoplasma 198, 73–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Fulton C. (1970). Amebo-flagellates as research partners: The laboratory biology of Naegleria and Tetramitus. In Methods in Cell Physiology, Volume 4. pp. 341–476. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tani T, Allen RD, and Naitoh Y (2000). Periodic tension development in the membrane of the in vitro contractile vacuole of Paramecium multimicronucleatum: modification by bisection, fusion and suction. J Exp Biol 203, 239–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tani T, Allen RD, and Naitoh Y (2001). Cellular membranes that undergo cyclic changes in tension: Direct measurement of force generation by an in vitro contractile vacuole of Paramecium multimicronucleatum. J Cell Sci 114, 785–795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bean BP (2007). The action potential in mammalian central neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci 8, 451–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lakatta EG, Maltsev VA, and Vinogradova TM (2010). A coupled SYSTEM of intracellular Ca2+ clocks and surface membrane voltage clocks controls the timekeeping mechanism of the heart's pacemaker. Circulation Research 106, 659–673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ren D. (2011). Sodium leak channels in neuronal excitability and rhythmic behaviors. Neuron 72, 899–911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fritz-Laylin LK, Prochnik SE, Ginger ML, Dacks JB, Carpenter ML, Field MC, Kuo A, Paredez A, Chapman J, Pham J, et al. (2010). The genome of Naegleria gruberi illuminates early eukaryotic versatility. Cell 140, 631–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hellsten M, and Roos UP (1998). The actomyosin cytoskeleton of amoebae of the cellular slime molds Acrasis rosea and Protostelium mycophaga: structure, biochemical properties, and function. Fungal Genet Biol 24, 123–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Allen RD, and Fok AK (1988). Membrane dynamics of the contractile vacuole complex of Paramecium. J Protozool 35, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cohen J, Garreau de Loubresse N, and Beisson J (1984). Actin microfilaments in Paramecium: localization and role in intracellular movements. Cell Motility 4, 443–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Pappas GD, and Brandt PW (1958). The fine structure of the contractile vacuole in Ameba. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 4, 485–488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Tominaga T, Allen RD, and Naitoh Y (1998). Electrophysiology of the in situ contractile vacuole complex of Paramecium reveals its membrane dynamics and electrogenic site during osmoregulatory activity. J Exp Biol 201, 451–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Fey P, Dodson RJ, Basu S, and Chisholm RL (2013). One stop shop for everything Dictyostelium: dictyBase and the Dicty Stock Center in 2012. Methods Mol Biol 983, 59–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Gaudet P, Fey P, and Chisholm R (2008). Transformation of Dictyostelium with plasmid DNA by electroporation. CSH Protoc 2008, pdb prot5103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9, 676–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Heger A, Hetherington K, Holm L, Mistry J, et al. (2014). Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 42, D222–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Harris CR, Millman KJ, van der Walt SJ, Gommers R, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D, Wieser E, Taylor J, Berg S, Smith NJ, et al. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.McKinney W. (2010). Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference 445. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.van der Walt S, Schonberger JL, Nunez-Iglesias J, Boulogne F, Warner JD, Yager N, Gouillart E, Yu T, and scikit-image c. (2014). scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ 2, e453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Velle KB, Fermino do Rosario C, Wadsworth P, and Fritz-Laylin LK (2021). A OneStep Solution to Fix and Stain Cells for Correlative Live and Fixed Microscopy. Curr Protoc 1, e308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Heuser J. (1981). Preparing biological samples for stereomicroscopy by the quick-freeze, deep-etch, rotary-replication technique. Methods Cell Biol 22, 97–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Heuser JE (2011). The origins and evolution of freeze-etch electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 60 Suppl 1, S3–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lord SJ, Velle KB, Mullins RD, and Fritz-Laylin LK (2020). SuperPlots: Communicating reproducibility and variability in cell biology. Journal of Cell Biology 219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Methods S1. Modeling contractile vacuole filling and emptying. Related to Figure 4.

2
3

Video S1. Contractile vacuole networks in Naegleria comprise small vacuoles and large bladders, with multiple generations co-existing. Related to Figure 1. (A) An N. gruberi cell stained with the membrane dye FM4-64 cell shows a contractile vacuole pumping cycle. Frames from this movie were selected for Figure 1B. (B) A representative cell shows multiple contractile vacuole pumping cycles, with full bladders pseudocolored through their expulsion. Note the surrounding network of uncolored vacuoles grows as each pseudocolored bladder pumps. This movie was also used in Figure 1C.

Download video file (49.2MB, mp4)
4

Video S2. Naegleria contractile vacuole networks are dynamic. Related to Figure 1. (A) A representative contractile vacuole fusion event is shown, with initial contractile vacuoles fusing to form a single bladder at 3 min 34 s. The two networks that merge are indicated with pink asterisks, displayed for 2 frames prior to the start of the pump. The single merged bladder is indicated with a magenta asterisk. (B) A representative fission event is shown, where a single bladder (magenta asterisk) becomes smaller contractile vacuoles (green asterisks). (C) A cell with multiple large and small contractile vacuole networks is shown. The two largest systems are indicated with yellow and cyan asterisks. Cells in A and B were untreated control cells from the experiments shown in Figure S1D. Cells in C are from a control experiment shown in Figure 3B (DMSO-treated control).

Download video file (19.5MB, mp4)
5

Video S3. Latrunculin does not prevent contractile vacuole pumping events in Naegleria. Related to Figure 3. A representative video of N. gruberi cells treated with 5 μM LatB shows that contractile vacuole expulsion events are still common.

Download video file (28.5MB, mp4)
6

Video S4. Actin does not localize to Dictyostelium contractile vacuoles. Related to Figure 3. A representative video of an RFP-LimE-expressing D. discoideum cell (the same example shown in Figure 3D) shows no enrichment of actin at contractile vacuoles (highlighted with green asterisks).

Download video file (2.8MB, mp4)

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the figures, tables, and supplemental files associated with this manuscript. All original code has been deposited at Zenodo and is publicly available; the DOI is listed in the key resources table. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

KEY RESOURCES TABLE

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant Proteins
Low-melt agarose Affymetrix Cat#32830 25 GM
Sorbitol Sigma Aldrich Cat#S1876-500G
Latrunculin B Abcam Cat#ab144291
CK-666 Calbiochem/Sigma Aldrich Cat#182515
CK-689 Calbiochem/Sigma Aldrich Cat#182517
DMSO Sigma Aldrich Cat#D2650-5x5ML
Nocodazole Sigma Aldrich Cat#M1404
Bafilomycin A1 Sigma Aldrich Cat#19-148
FM 4-64 Dye Invitrogen Cat#T13320
Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin Thermo Fisher Cat#A12379
Deposited Data
Pfam-A database (v35.0) 95 RRID:SCR_004726
JGI genome portal (N. gruberi proteins Naegr1_best_proteins.fasta) 86 RRID:SCR_002383
Experimental Models: Cell Lines
Naegleria gruberi strain NEG-M Chandler Fulton ATCC30224
Dictyostelium discoideum strain Ax2-ME (cloned and expanded from strain AX2-RRK) Dictybase stock center DBS0235521
Recombinant DNA
RFP-LimE plasmid Dictybase.org 475
Software and Algorithms
NIS Elements with Advanced Research Package Nikon Instruments RRID:SCR_014329
Fiji 94 RRID:SCR_002285
GraphPad Prism v9 GraphPad RRID:SCR_002798
Custom code This work Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8034763)

RESOURCES