Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Injury. 2023 Jun 4;54(9):110859. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110859

Table 3.

Unadjusted In-Hospital Mortality by Trauma Funding Status


Trauma Funding Statusa

Without Trauma Funding
(N=99071)
With Trauma Funding
(N=142685)
p-value

All Patients 3293 (3.3%) 4820 (3.4%) 0.4806f
Re-triage Status <0.0001f
Field Triage
  Appropriate Triageb 2540 (4.6%) 2995 (5.2%)
  Under-Triagec 595 (1.5%) 1195 (1.7%)
Re-Triage
  Optimald 105 (6.3%) 189 (4.7%)
  Sub-optimale 13 (9.3%) 60 (4.8%)
Other 40 (1.2%) 381 (4.9%)
Homogeneity of ORs Across Trauma Funding Status Groups 0.0009g
a.

Trauma Funding Status was determined by the absence ($0.00) or presence (>$0.00) of per capita state trauma funding in the state that the patient was hospitalized in.

b.

Patients presenting to an emergency department at or directly admitted to a Level I or II trauma center, with no subsequent transfer, were defined as Appropriate Triage on the field.

c.

Patients presenting to an emergency department at or directly admitted to a Level III, IV, or non-trauma center, with no subsequent transfer, were defined as Under-Triage on the field.

d.

Patients emergently transferred from any emergency department to a Level I or II trauma center were defined as Optimal Re-Triage.

e.

Patients emergently transferred from any emergency department to a Level III, IV, or non-trauma center were defined as Sub-optimal Re-Triage.

f.

P-value testing the association between total mortality and trauma funding status obtained using a Pearson’s chi-square test.

g.

P-value testing for the homogeneity of odds ratios between funding status groups via a test of a three-way interaction between trauma funding status, re-triage status, and mortality. The Other group was excluded when performing this test.