Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Immunol. 2023 Jun 27;53(9):e2250362. doi: 10.1002/eji.202250362

A novel cryopreservation and biobanking strategy to study lymphoid tissue stromal cells in human disease

Joshua D Brandstadter 1, Angelina De Martin 2, Mechthild Lϋtge 2, Antonio Ferreira 3, Brian T Gaudette 4, Yves Stanossek 5, Shumei Wang 3, Michael V Gonzalez 6, Edward Camiolo 7, Gerald Wertheim 7, Bridget Austin 6, David Allman 4, Adam Bagg 4, Megan S Lim 8, David C Fajgenbaum 6, Jon C Aster 3, Burkhard Ludewig 2, Ivan Maillard 1
PMCID: PMC10529925  NIHMSID: NIHMS1918857  PMID: 37366295

Abstract

Non-hematopoietic lymph node stromal cells (LNSCs) regulate lymphocyte trafficking, survival, and function for key roles in host defense, autoimmunity, alloimmunity, and lymphoproliferative disorders. However, the study of LNSCs in human diseases is complicated by a dependence on viable lymphoid tissues, which are most often excised prior to establishment of a specific diagnosis. Here, we demonstrate that cryopreservation can be used to bank lymphoid tissue for the study of LNSCs in human disease. Using human tonsils and lymph nodes, lymphoid tissue fragments were cryopreserved for subsequent enzymatic digestion and recovery of viable non-hematopoietic cells. Flow cytometry and single-cell transcriptomics identified comparable proportions of LNSC cell types in fresh and cryopreserved tissue. Moreover, cryopreservation had little effect on transcriptional profiles, which showed significant overlap between tonsils and lymph nodes. The presence and spatial distribution of transcriptionally defined cell types was confirmed by in situ analyses. Our broadly applicable approach promises to greatly enable research into the roles of LNSCs in human disease.

Keywords: Lymph node, Tonsil, Stromal cells, Lymphoid tissue fibroblasts, Cryopreservation

Introduction

Despite comprising less than five percent of cells in lymphoid tissues, non-hematopoietic lymph node stromal cells (LNSCs) have an out-sized role in shaping immune cell responses and homeostasis (1). LNSCs include heterogenous fibroblast and endothelial cell populations with profound effects on lymphocyte trafficking, survival, and activation (2) with roles in host defense, autoimmunity, alloimmunity, the tumor microenvironment, responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibition, and inflammatory disorders (313).

Lymph nodes (LN) and other secondary lymphoid organs function as specialized sentinel sites for the processing of foreign antigens and the generation of specific adaptive immune responses (1, 2, 8, 14). Proper LN function requires a delicate choreography between antigen-presenting cells, T cells, B cells, and other cellular partners. LNSCs coordinate the interaction of these multiple cells via compartmentalization of regional LN microenvironments that control lymphocyte recruitment, survival, and function. LNSCs include distinct cell types, including fibroblastic stromal cells (FSCs), lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs), and blood endothelial cells (BECs). FSCs are themselves a collection of heterogenous cells with distinct immunological functions whose inflammation-induced remodeling is critical to the adaptive immune response (1, 2, 8, 14). FSC subsets include contractile and lymphocyte-interacting groups. Contractile fibroblasts include vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Immune-interacting fibroblasts include T cell zone reticular cells (TRCs) that can be further subdivided by their microanatomical location and level of expression of the chemokine CCL19, as well as perivascular reticular cells (PRCs) and B cell-interacting reticular cells (BRCs), including follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) in germinal centers. LECs and BECs can also be further defined into different subsets, largely related to their microanatomical position. For example, different populations of LECs have been described at the floor and ceiling of the subcapsular sinus, efferent and afferent lymphatics, and medullary sinus (15). Recent single-cell transcriptomic data have heightened our understanding of lymphoid tissue stromal cell subsets (1320), and capturing this rich information is essential to understand the role and regulation of these cells in human disease.

Unlike hematopoietic cells that have been analyzed extensively with the aid of large-scale biobanking, the study of LNSCs in human disease has been limited. Embedded in collagen and other extracellular matrix proteins, LNSCs require enzymatic digestion to be extracted efficiently from tissues. These limitations have restricted the study of these cells in human disease to fresh tissue processed as soon as possible after harvest, a labor-intensive strategy that is costly and subject to batch effects, and by necessity often involves work-up of tissues prior to establishment of a definitive diagnosis (11, 13, 1922). Thus, an effective cryopreservation method is needed for large-scale biobanking of lymphoid tissues to learn more about the role of LNSCs in human disease.

Here, we introduce the use of whole-tissue cryopreservation for the study of LNSCs by flow cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). Following this protocol, we demonstrate that 2–3 mm fragments of lymphoid tissue can be cryopreserved with good subsequent recovery of viable non-hematopoietic cells, enabling the identification of the same variety of LNSC subsets by flow cytometry and scRNAseq as observed in fresh tissue. We demonstrate effective tissue cryopreservation using two different DMSO-containing reagents and following different protocols, with superior viability and cell yield compared to when cryopreservation is performed after enzymatic digestion. Our strategy can facilitate the collection of a wide variety of clinical samples without excessive upfront financial and labor commitments. Our approach also provides time for investigators to define the pathological diagnosis ahead of committing resources to a sample and to process multiple samples concurrently, thus minimizing batch effects. Altogether, this strategy enables systematic studies of LNSCs in lymphomas and other human lymphoid tissue disorders via large-scale biobanking of lymphoid tissue.

Results

Tissue cryopreservation preserves cell viability to allow lymphoid tissue stromal cell isolation.

Tissue cryopreservation would represent a major advance to enable large-scale collection of lymphoid tissues for the study of LNSCs in human disease. We developed a workflow to process cryopreserved lymphoid tissue into a single-cell suspension for flow cytometry-based immunophenotyping, cell sorting, and scRNAseq (Figure 1A). To systematically validate our approach, we applied our workflow to hyperplastic human tonsils received fresh as excess discarded tissue. Tonsils were cut into 2–3 mm fragments that were stirred to ensure random sampling from all anatomical parts of the tonsil (Figure 1B). Fragments were cryopreserved through various strategies described below and thawed or processed fresh (Figure 1AB). These cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry or flow sorted to enrich for CD45EpCAM stromal cells before scRNAseq.

Figure 1. Whole tissue cryopreservation preserves cell viability to allow biobanking of lymphoid tissue.

Figure 1.

(A) Schematic overview of the procedure to process lymphoid tissue for single-cell RNA sequencing. Tissue processing involved gross dissection of adipose and connective tissue, cutting samples into 2–3 mm tissue fragments, and serial enzymatic digestion with collagenase, dispase, and DNase to extract LNSCs into single-cell suspensions. Selection of LNSCs by cell sorting involved gating on live singlets with a CD45EpCAM immunophenotype. 10,000 sorted cells were then loaded into the 10X Chromium Controller before next-generation sequencing. Image made with Biorender. (B) Fresh tonsils received as pathology excess specimen (top) and after gross dissection and cutting into 2–3 mm pieces (bottom). As pictured, 8–10 pieces (ca. 150mg total) were placed in each cryovial containing 1mL DMSO-containing cryopreservative for freezing. (C) Tonsil pieces were either kept fresh in FBS-containing RPMI at 4°C for two days or cryopreserved for two days or cryopreserved for two months. Flow cytometry analysis of freshly processed, 2-day cryopreserved, or 2-month cryopreserved tonsil cells. The first column shows flow cytometry plots with live/dead cell discrimination based upon DAPI uptake. Live cells were then analyzed for expression of CD45 and hematopoietic lineage markers (CD3, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD20, CD56) with gating on non-hematopoietic cells. These non-hematopoietic cells were analyzed for expression of the fibroblast marker podoplanin (PDPN) and endothelial marker (CD31), with subsequent gating identifying fibroblastic stromal cells (PDPN+CD31), blood endothelial cells (PDPNCD31+), and lymphatic endothelial cells (PDPN+CD31+). Bar graphs compare viability and recovery of non-hematopoietic cells from tonsils that were freshly processed or cryopreserved for 2 days (p = 0.68 and p = 0.78, respectively, by Student’s t-test, n= 3 patients/group).

We first assessed the viability of cells recovered by enzymatic digestion from cryopreserved versus fresh tonsils and key phenotypic features of the CD45 stromal cell compartment (Figure 1C). A fraction of the processed tonsillar fragments was frozen in a DMSO-containing cryopreservative reagent (Cryostor CS10), while another fraction was stored at 4°C in RPMI medium with 2% FBS. Two days later, cryopreserved samples were thawed and digested in parallel to fresh samples kept at 4°C. The single-cell suspension was then stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. Additional cryopreserved tissue was stored at −80°C for two months before being thawed, digested, stained, and analyzed. Among all singlets (which included both hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cells), there was a comparable proportion of viable cells in samples that had been left fresh or cryopreserved for 2 days (n = 3 patients, p = 0.68) or 2 months (Figure 1C). Among viable cells, fresh and cryopreserved tissue contained a similar proportion of CD45 non-hematopoietic cells (p = 0.78). Furthermore, similar proportions of PDPN+CD31 FSCs among all CD45 cells were recovered from fresh vs. cryopreserved tissue (30% fresh vs. 33% cryopreserved). The same was true for PDPNCD31+ BECs (20% fresh vs. 14% cryopreserved) and PDPN+CD31+ LECs (0.7% fresh vs. 0.8% cryopreserved). Altogether, these data indicate that viable fibroblasts and endothelial cells could be efficiently recovered after cryopreservation of whole lymphoid tissue.

Single-cell RNA sequencing of sorted cells identifies stromal subsets in fresh lymphoid tissue.

To capture the diversity of stromal elements in human tonsils, we turned to scRNAseq as a sensitive and unbiased approach to identify LNSC subsets. We first generated scRNAseq data for freshly acquired tonsillar LNSCs. We processed hyperplastic tonsils into 2–3 mm fragments. After enzymatic digestion and cell sorting of CD45EpCAM cells, we analyzed 27,608 total cells from three patients with tonsillar hyperplasia. The relative expression of established marker genes for FSCs (PDGFRA, PDGFRB, CXCL13, APOE, CCL21, CCL19, and PDPN), BECs (CDH5, ENG, CD34, PECAM1), and LECs (PROX1, PECAM1, PDPN) was displayed on a heat map to identify stromal cell types (Figure 2A). FSCs could be further sub-divided into distinct subsets (Figure 2BD), including VSMCs, ACTA2+ PRCs, and CCL19+ TRCs. VSMCs are contractile fibroblasts that express high levels of ACTA2 in addition to MCAM and genes encoding proteins involved in contractility (TAGLN, MYH11, TPM2). ACTA2+ PRCs express a lower level of ACTA2 and other contractile genes in addition to CCL19 and collagen mRNA produced by TRCs (COL1A1, COL1A2). Immune-interacting TRCs could also be identified via expression of CCL19 and CCL21. A subset of CXCL13-expresssing FDCs that sustain germinal center responses was also observed (22). These fibroblast and endothelial subset identifications are comparable to similar recently published data after accounting for divergent sorting strategies employed upstream of scRNAseq (11, 13, 19, 20). A recent detailed analysis of human tonsils identified PDPN+ FRCs that were comparable to our CCL19-expressing TRCs, CD21+ FDCs, and an ACTA2+ “double-negative” (PDPNCD21) fibroblast subset similar to our ACTA2+ PRCs and VSMCs (11).

Figure 2. Single-cell RNA sequencing of sorted CD45EpCAM cells identifies distinct stromal cell subsets in fresh lymphoid tissue.

Figure 2.

(A) Heatmap showing gene expression of known markers for fibroblastic stromal cells (PDGFRA, PDGFRB, CXCL13, APOE, CCL21, CCL19, and PDPN), blood endothelial cells (CDH5, ENG, CD34, PECAM1), and lymphatic endothelial cells (PROX1, PECAM1, PDPN). Underneath, UMAP shows all cells through Seurat-based clustering of sorted CD45EpCAM cells acquired from three freshly processed tonsils after filters for quality control and removal of residual hematopoietic and epithelial cells. Cell coloring based on cell type: fibroblastic stromal cells in grey, blood endothelial cells in yellow, lymphatic endothelial cells in green, and other cells in red. (B) Heatmap showing gene expression of known markers for fibroblastic stromal cell subsets, including ACTA2+ perivascular reticular cells (ACTA2, TAGLN, TPM2, PDGFRB), vascular smooth muscle cells (ACTA2, MYH11, MCAM), CCL19hi T-zone fibroblastic reticular cells (CCL19, CCL21, CXCL12, CXCL9), CCL19lo T-zone fibroblastic reticular cells (LUM, DCN, PDPN, PDGFRA), Pi16+ reticular cells (PI16, LEPR), and follicular dendritic cells (CXCL13, CLU, FDCSP, DES). (C) UMAP showing Seurat-based clustering with labeled cell-types based on expression of known markers. (D) Feature plots show relative expression of cluster-defining markers.

Whole tissue cryopreservation preserves diverse stromal cell subsets.

Given the sensitivity of scRNAseq to identify LNSC subsets, we tested whether all subsets identified in fresh samples could be recovered in cryopreserved tissue. Hyperplastic tonsils were cut into 2–3 mm pieces and either stored at 4°C or cryopreserved for two days before processing. Tissue from the same tonsil was also left cryopreserved for two months before thawing and similar processing. The number of genes in each cell (nFeature_RNA), the number of molecules in each cell (nCount_RNA), and the mitochondrial content for each cell (percent.mt) were similar for tonsillar tissue processed fresh (median values 956, 1841, 5.2%, respectively), after cryopreservation for two days (median values 876, 1683, 5.9%, respectively), or after cryopreservation for two months (median values 1086, 2142, 6.0%, respectively) (Supplementary Figure 1A). Gene expression in tissue processed fresh or cryopreserved (averaging expression from 2-day and 2-month cryopreserved samples) was largely within a standard deviation, indicating a lack of any significant effect of cryopreservation on transcript representation (Figure 3A). Similar proportions of fibroblasts (grey; 77% fresh vs. 83% cryopreserved), BECs (yellow; 20% fresh vs. 14% cryopreserved), and LECs (green; 0.7% fresh vs. 0.4% cryopreserved) were recovered across fresh and cryopreserved tissue (Figure 3B). Furthermore, no fibroblast or endothelial cell subpopulation was lost with cryopreservation, and no subset was significantly differentially abundant (all spatialFDR > 0.99) (Figure 3C, Supplementary Figure 2A).

Figure 3. Whole tissue cryopreservation preserves diverse stromal cell subsets detected by single-cell RNA sequencing.

Figure 3.

Tonsil pieces were either kept fresh in FBS-containing RPMI at 4°C for two days vs. cryopreserved for two days or cryopreserved for two months. (A) Linear regression of gene expression between freshly processed and cryopreserved tonsil (with “cryo” defined as an average expression of two-day and two-month cryopreserved tissue). Pearson correlation with associated p-value listed in graph with genes showing increased transcript abundance in cryopreserved tissue highlighted in red and decreased abudandance highlighted in blue. (B) Colors in each bar define proportions of each subset within the entire sample with fibroblastic stromal cells (FSCs) highlighted in grey, blood endothelial cells (BECs) in yellow, lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) in green, and otherwise unidentified cells (other) in red. (C) Colors in each bar define proportions of each Seurat-defined cluster within the entire sample. Cluster identities were determined by expression of known markers from analysis of freshly processed tonsil in Figure 2.

Whole tissue cryopreservation is feasible with different DMSO-containing reagents.

Whole tissue cryopreservation appears successful at recovering all fibroblast and endothelial cell subsets from lymphoid tissue using a commercial DMSO-containing cryopreservative reagent, Cryostor CS10 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). We then asked whether we could achieve similar results using 10% DMSO and 90% FBS for cryopreservation. Cryopreservation with Cryostor reagent or DMSO/FBS were similarly successful at maintaining cell viability (77% Cryostor vs. 80% DMSO) and recovery of FSCs (PDPN+CD31; 53% vs. 56%), BECs (PDPNCD31+; 13% vs. 13%), and LECs (PDPN+CD31+; 1.8% vs. 1.4%) as assessed by flow cytometry (Supplementary Figure 3A). We then analyzed CD45EpCAM cells sorted from these conditions by scRNAseq. Samples processed fresh or through either cryopreservative strategy for two days showed comparable quality control parameters (Supplementary Figure 1B). No transcript appeared to be enriched beyond a standard deviation in cryopreserved tissue compared to fresh tissue after averaging gene expression from both cryopreservation strategies (Supplementary Figure 3B). Expression of only one gene was enriched in Cryostor-preserved cells compared to DMSO/FBS-preserved cells – the hemoglobin beta globin gene (HBB), representing a likely contaminant. We observed similar recovery of a dominant FSC population (grey; 69% Cryostor vs. 75% DMSO) in addition to BECs (yellow; 23% Cryostor vs. 20% DMSO) and LECs (green) (Supplementary Figure 3C; 6.8% Cryostor vs. 3.2% DMSO) between cryopreserved samples using either Cryostor or DMSO in FBS. All Seurat-defined clusters were present at similar proportions in freshly processed tonsil, Cryostor-preserved tonsil, or DMSO/FBS-preserved tonsil (all spatialFDR > 0.99) (Supplementary Figure 2A, Supplementary Figure 3D). Altogether, our data show that several DMSO-containing cryopreservation reagents (including an inexpensive non-commercial preparation) can be used to biobank whole lymphoid tissue for the study of stromal cells.

Cryopreservation of enzymatically digested cells impairs viability but preserves stromal subsets.

We next studied the impact of enzymatic digestion prior to cryopreservation. The percentage of viable cells was decreased when enzymatically digested cells were cryopreserved (65%) compared to fresh tissue (93%) or whole tissue cryopreservation (90%) (Figure 4A). After accounting for this loss of viability, similar proportions of FSCs (59% whole tissue vs. 59% enzymatically digested cells), BECs (13% whole tissue vs. 7% enzymatically digested cells), and LECs (1.2% whole tissue vs. 0.7% enzymatically digested cells) were observed by flow cytometry. Using scRNAseq, no change in the number of gene transcripts per cell, number of molecules per cell, or increase in the mitochondrial content was observed when enzymatic digestion preceded cryopreservation (Supplementary Figure 1C). Similarly, no change in transcript representation by over one standard deviation was observed between freshly processed tissue or cryopreserved tissue (with averaged data from the two cryopreservation strategies) (Figure 4B). Whole tissue cryopreservation and cryopreservation of enzymatically digested cells also generated similar transcriptomic data within a standard deviation. FSCs (74% whole tissue vs. 86% enzymatically digested), BECs (22% whole tissue vs. 12% enzymatically digested), and LECs (1.1% whole tissue vs. 0.9% enzymatically digested) were extracted in similar proportions regardless of whether whole tissue or enzymatically digested cells were cryopreserved (Figure 4C). All fibroblast and endothelial cell subsets were preserved in similar proportions with cryopreservation of enzymatically digested cells compared to fresh tissue or whole tissue cryopreservation (all spatialFDR > 0.99) (Figure 4D, Supplementary Figure 2A). Thus, for samples that are large enough to tolerate loss of cell viability, creation of cell suspensions prior to cryopreservation appears to be a suitable alternative approach, although it is more labor-intensive upfront.

Figure 4. Cryopreservation of enzymatically digested cells impairs viability but preserves stromal cell subsets.

Figure 4.

Tonsil fragments were either kept fresh in FBS-containing RPMI at 4°C for two days or cryopreserved either as whole tissue or cells that have been enzymatically digested. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of freshly processed tonsil cells, whole-tissue cryopreserved cells, or cryopreserved enzymatically digested cells. The first column represents live/dead discrimination by DAPI uptake among all singlets. Viability is also shown as a bar graph (n = 3 tonsils) * p < 0.05 by Student’s t-test comparison after one-way ANOVA. Live cells were then analyzed for expression of CD45 and hematopoietic lineage markers (CD3, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD20, CD56) in the second column with gating showing non-hematopoietic cells. These non-hematopoietic cells were then analyzed for expression of the fibroblast marker podoplanin (PDPN) and endothelial marker (CD31) with gating showing fibroblastic stromal cells (PDPN+CD31), blood endothelial cells (PDPN CD31+), and lymphatic endothelial cells (PDPN+CD31+). (B) Linear regression of gene expression between (left) freshly processed and cryopreserved tonsil (with “cryo” defined as an average expression of whole tissue and enzymatically digested cell cryopreservation). Linear regression of gene expression between (right) whole tissue and enzymatically digested cell cryopreservation is also shown. Pearson correlation with associated p-value listed in graph. (C) Colors in each bar define the proportion of each subset within the entire sample with fibroblastic stromal cells (FSCs) in grey, blood endothelial cells (BECs) in yellow, lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) in green, and otherwise un-identified cells (other) in red. (D) Colors in each bar define proportions of each Seurat-defined cluster within the entire sample. Cluster identities were determined via expression of known markers from analysis of freshly processed tonsil in Figure 2.

In situ localization of lymphoid stromal cell subsets identified by single-cell RNA sequencing.

To assess if gene expression data from cryopreserved lymphoid tissue could be used for downstream spatial analysis, we stained tissue sections for specific proteins and transcripts. Our scRNAseq analysis of sorted CD45EpCAM cells from fresh tonsils identified major populations of contractile and immune-interacting fibroblasts (Figure 2). Contractile fibroblasts express VSMC genes, suggesting a role as perivascular cells. Immune-interacting fibroblasts express chemokines, such as CCL19 and CCL21, and other molecules consistent with their identity as fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) that form fine conduits for soluble antigen transport and other immunological functions. ACTA2+ PRCs were predicted to act as FRCs based on prior work as well as their collagen and chemokine expression profile (2). We sought to verify these histologic inferences about the fibroblast subsets identified in our scRNAseq data by immunofluorescent microscopy of tonsillar tissue. Cells that stain for alpha-smooth muscle actin (aSMA, the ACTA2 gene product) were observed to encircle CD31+CD34+ endothelial cells in tonsils (Supplementary Figure 4AC) consistent with the expected distribution of VSMCs. In contrast, cells expressing CCL19 or another FRC marker, PDPN, showed a reticular morphology and were scattered diffusely throughout the tissue. Another group of ACTA2-expressing cells were observed to form mesh-like reticular networks, fitting with their identity as ACTA2+ PRCs (Supplementary Figure 4B). To further validate the microanatomical positioning of our transcriptionally defined subsets, we employed in situ hybridization to directly detect mRNA. As proof-of-principle, our scRNAseq data identified a FDC subset of fibroblasts that expressed FDCSP mRNA. Consistent with our transcriptomic data, we detected FDCSP mRNA in a germinal center pattern, while CCL19 mRNA was present in interfollicular regions (Supplementary Figure 4D). PDPN+CD31+ LECs could also be identified in tonsils by immunofluorescent imaging (Supplementary Figure 4E).

Altogether, this work demonstrates that whole tissue cryopreservation can be employed to facilitate the study of LNSCs in human disease. Despite concern that cryopreservation would impair cell yield or gene expression due to the need for enzymatic digestion to extract LNSC, we could recover cells with comparable viability. Furthermore, whole tissue cryopreservation – including with a simple 10% DMSO solution in fetal bovine serum – led to no loss of even rare LNSC subsets and no global impact on transcript representation. Features of LNSCs identified in tonsils by flow cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing could be orthogonally confirmed by fluorescent microscopy and in situ hybridization.

Tonsillar stromal cells have LN correlates and model LN tissue.

Given limited access to fresh lymphoid tissue, we used hyperplastic tonsils to test the efficacy of cryopreservation strategies. However, LNs are the lymphoid tissue of primary clinical interest – the most common microenvironment for lymphomas and other lymphoproliferative disorders. We therefore sought to compare tonsils to LNs to determine commonalities and differences in their stromal composition. Following the same experimental protocol, we processed three LNs that had non-specific inflammatory (“reactive”) histologies as compared to freshly processed tonsils. We generated scRNAseq data from a total of 20,397 analyzable LN cells. Analysis of all freshly processed tonsillar and LN cells in a single dimensionality reduction UMAP showed significant overlap between clusters regardless of tissue of origin with the exception of one cluster that was predominantly observed in tonsils and a nearby cluster disproportionately composed of LN cells (Supplementary Figure 5A5B). Using relative expression of established markers for FSCs, BECs, and LECs (Supplementary Figure 5C), we determined the cell type of Seurat-defined clusters (Supplementary Figure 5B). Overall, we observed similar proportions of each FSCs (77.1%±0.9% tonsil vs. 75.6%±10.6% LN), BECs (18.9%±1.5% tonsil vs. 19.5%±10.6% LN), and LECs (1.8%±1.3% tonsil vs. 4.3%±0.7% LN) across samples irrespective of tissue of origin. Similarly, we used the relative expression of fibroblast subset markers (Supplementary Figure 5D) to identify Seurat-defined clusters (Supplementary Figure 5B). Comparing the proportions of each LNSC subset, we observed distinct tonsillar (LogFC = 6.00, SpatialFDR = 0.11, p = 0.051) and LN (LogFC = −7.83, SpatialFDR = 0.089, p = 0.032) CCL19+ TRC clusters and increased Pi16+ PRCs in LN tissue compared to tonsil (LogFC = −5.67, SpatialFDR = 0.094, p = 0.038) (Supplementary Figure 2B, Supplementary Figure 5E). While tonsil and LN subsets expressed CCL19 similarly, they differentially expressed other genes, such as CCL21, CXCL12, TNFSF11, and CXCL9 (Supplementary Figure 5FG). Altogether, these data suggest that LN CCL19+ TRC have a more inflammatory phenotype compared to the corresponding tonsillar cells, possibly as a result of sampling LN with reactive inflammation. Otherwise, similar cell-type representation and gene expression was observed upon comparing tonsillar to LN stromal cells.

Cryopreserved human lymph nodes maintain viability, gene expression, and fibroblast composition.

To test whether whole-tissue cryopreservation could be applied to LNs (the lymphoid tissue of greatest clinical interest), we compared human LNs processed fresh and after cryopreservation. Two LNs with inflammatory changes (one with non-specific reactive changes and another resembling hyaline vascular Castleman Disease) were left fresh at 4°C or cryopreserved at −80°C for two days, similar to how we processed tonsils using Cryostor. Another LN with an atypical T cell expansion was processed fresh on the day after surgical resection and, separately, after 18 months of cryopreservation at −80°C. All three LNs were pathologically enlarged. No difference was observed in cell viability from LNs processed fresh or cryopreserved (Figure 5A), with both demonstrating similar scRNASeq quality control metrics (Supplementary Figure 1DE). LN fibroblastic and endothelial cell subsets could be identified by scRNAseq (Figures 5BC). We observed no significant difference in gene expression between the three cryopreserved LNs and the same LNs processed fresh (Figure 5D). Despite subtle differences, similar proportions of all LNSCs were observed between freshly processed and cryopreserved LNs (Figure 5E). No significant differences were observed by differential abundance analysis (all spatialFDR > 0.99; Supplementary Figure 2C).

Figure 5. Human lymph nodes can be cryopreserved to maintain viability, gene expression, and fibroblast subset composition.

Figure 5.

Three LNs were processed fresh or after cryopreservation for two days or 18 months prior to enzymatic digestion, CD45-EpCAM- cell sorting, and scRNAseq following the schematic in Figure 1A. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of freshly processed (top) and cryopreserved (bottom) LN cells. The first column represents live/dead discrimination by DAPI uptake among all singlets. The second column shows the percentage of CD45- cells among live singlets in the fresh and cryopreserved tissue. Viability on all samples is also shown as a bar graph (n = 3 LNs, p = 0.64 by Student’s t-test). (B) UMAP showing Seurat-based clustering with labeled cell types based on expression of known markers. (C) Feature plots show relative expression of cluster-defining markers. (D) Linear regression of gene expression between freshly processed and cryopreserved LNs. Pearson correlation with associated p-value listed in graph. (E) Colors in each bar define proportions of each Seurat-defined cluster within the entire sample.

For the LN that was cryopreserved for 18 months, we also sorted CD45+ cells for scRNAseq to compare fresh and cryopreserved hematopoietic cells with similar quality control metrics (Supplementary Figure 1E). In keeping with the histopathological observation of an atypical T cell infiltrate, scRNAseq showed a high proportion of T cells (Supplementary Figure 6AB). Importantly, gene expression and cellular composition were similar in freshly processed and cryopreserved hematopoietic cells (Supplementary Figure 6CD).

Finally, we also re-clustered LEC subsets, revealing LEC heterogeneity in our inflamed LNs (Supplementary Figure 7AC) that could be compared to previous work on resting LNs (15). We observed one subset that did not express the LEC gene PROX1, but expressed both PECAM1, JAM2 and CCL19, consistent with previously described CD34+ stromal cells (SCs) (15) (Supplementary Figure 7B). We identified a ceiling LEC (cLEC) cluster expressing NT5E and CAV1 in addition to two medullary LEC (mLEC) clusters expressing CAV1, TNFRSF9, MARCO, and LYVE1, as well as two floor LEC (fLEC) clusters expressing CAV1, TNFRSF9, and MARCO. These subsets were similar to those previously identified in resting LNs (15). Focusing on LEC subsets, we observed no differences in gene expression between fresh and cryopreserved LNs (Supplementary Figure 7D). Subtle differences could be observed in proportions of LEC subsets (Supplementary 7E). However, these differences were not statistically significant (spatialFDR > 0.99) by formal differential abundance analysis of the LECs accounting for variation between all samples (Supplementary Figure 2D).

Discussion

We have established a versatile approach for whole lymphoid tissue cryopreservation that can allow biobanking of specimens and build insights into how lymphoid tissue stromal cells influence human health. By testing alternative cryopreservation strategies, we showed that small pieces of lymphoid tissue frozen in a broadly available, non-commercial solution can enable long-term biobanking of clinical samples despite the added stress of enzymatic digestion needed to recover LNSCs. Altogether, our insights pave the way to a scale of research that will be needed to establish the roles of LNSCs in human disease.

So far, a heavy dependence on fresh tissue limited the investigation of LNSCs in human disease. For example, follicular lymphoma – a common hematological malignancy where stroma has long been suggested to influence lymphomagenesis and chemotherapy refractoriness – was recently shown to involve remodeling of LNSCs (11). However, this study was limited to 3–4 follicular lymphoma LNs that could be processed as fresh tissue, without comparison to other types of lymphomas or to reactive LNs. Instead, mechanistic insights into human lymphoid stromal cells were achieved using more readily available tonsils, a limitation in the applicability of the findings noted by the authors. Other recent work described a novel LNSC niche that plays a key role in dendritic cell homeostasis in mice and that was shown to be critical in T cell immunity (20). Confirmation of the applicability of this finding to humans relied upon data from only 3 resting human LNs resected during cancer staging surgeries, where a LNSC subset with a similar transcriptomic signature was observed. The availability of a biobanking approach as described here will enable collection of large numbers of LNs, which will both control for the heterogeneity inherent to clinical samples and facilitate the study of rare or unusual LN pathologies.

Peripheral T cell lymphomas such as angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL) and atypical lymphoproliferative disorders such as Castleman disease have characteristic histologic aberrations involving LNSCs that make them attractive for further investigation. For AITL, this includes an increase in FDC numbers, a highly arborized vasculature, expanded B cell subsets and heterogeneous inflammatory cells (23). Histologic aberrations in stroma and an expansion of non-neoplastic immune cells can complicate the diagnosis of AITL. Castleman disease is characterized by prominent FDCs in addition to hypervascularity and atretic germinal centers (24). In addition, past work suggested clonality of LNSCs in the unicentric form of Castleman disease (2527). Insights into the role that LNSCs might play in their pathogenesis will be facilitated by cryopreservation strategies and could inform the development of new diagnostic approaches for these rare diseases with a challenging diagnosis.

We found superior stromal cell viability for whole tissue cryopreservation compared to cryopreservation of enzymatically digested cells, although analysis of all viable cells found no change in transcript representation or loss of any LNSC subset. Other strategies such as single nuclei RNA sequencing can be useful to extract single cell transcriptomic information from complex tissues, including tissue cryopreserved shortly after harvest. Indeed, this approach can be used in place of single-cell RNA sequencing to avoid the challenges of extracting cells from extracellular matrix (28, 29). Single nuclear RNA sequencing protects against dissociation-induced gene alterations and can detect rare cell types missed by other RNA-sequencing strategies (2931). Despite these advantages, all LNSCs are rare cell types in bulk lymphoid tissue and single nuclear sequencing without dissociation into single-cell suspension would prohibit LNSC enrichment by CD45 bead- or column-based depletion or cell sorting. The loss of LNSC enrichment would prevent detailed analysis of LNSCs as most of the sample would be comprised of hematopoietic cells. Particularly rare but important LNSC subtypes – such as FDCs that are critical for germinal center responses – would be especially difficult and costly to capture with single-nuclear RNA sequencing alone, as it would mandate RNA sequencing from a very large number of nuclei. Therefore, whole tissue cryopreservation remains the more attractive approach for the study of LNSCs.

Hyperplastic tonsils, typically discarded without pathologic review after resection, provided a large quantity of regularly available tissue to evaluate whether cryopreserved and fresh tissues could produce comparable quality data. However, LNs are the lymphoid tissue that harbors the vast majority of lymphomas and other lymphoproliferative disorders and where further investigation of LNSCs would be of most clinical interest. We therefore compared tonsillar to LN stroma using LNs with non-specific inflammatory (“reactive”) histologies. We found substantial overlap of fibroblastic and endothelial cell populations despite distinct tissues of origin. The greatest distinction between the tissues was the CCL19+ TRC subset, which appeared more inflammatory in LNs with higher expression of CCL21, CXCL9, CXCL12, and TNFSF11. Overall, these differences could be related to the fact that sampled LNs were likely more acutely inflamed than chronically enlarged tonsils that were resected for obstructive sleep apnea. Finally, we showed that our whole-tissue cryopreservation approach could be applied to LNs, as even LNs cryopreserved for 18 months preserved good fidelity in cellular composition and gene expression compared to freshly processed tissue.

Altogether, we have developed whole tissue cryopreservation to advance the study of LNSCs in human disease by providing a method whereby tissue can be banked for later study. We hope that this will foster insights into how LNSCs might contribute to the lymphoma microenvironment, atypical lymphoproliferative disorders such as Castleman Disease, responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment as well as pathogenesis of infectious and autoimmune diseases. Additional technical advances, including use of spatial transcriptomic approaches that might better define LNSC-lymphocyte interactions, will provide even greater insight into the potential roles that these cells play in human disease.

Materials and Methods

Human tonsil collection and gross dissection

De-identified, anonymous human tonsils were procured as pathology excess from pediatric donors at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia via a material transfer agreement with the University of Pennsylvania. Patients were six to 21 years of age with tonsillar hyperplasia. Samples were received on the same day as surgical resection. Using a scalpel blade, electrocauterized fragments and adipose tissue were carefully removed, and tonsils were then cut finely into 2–3 mm pieces. Specifically, tonsils were cut longitudinally with parallel incisions to create thick sections that were then successively cut across the perpendicular axis into smaller and smaller pieces until each piece was 2–3 mm in size. Smaller fragments maximize the surface area subsequently exposed to enzymes, thus enabling faster and more complete digestion. Tonsil fragments were mixed by gentle stirring to ensure uniform sampling from all areas of the tonsil. Finally, the pieces were stored fresh at 4°C in RPMI-1640 media with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) or cryopreserved as described below.

Human LN collection

Patients with lymphadenopathy undergoing surgical resection provided consent to donate a portion of their resected LN for research per protocol approved by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institutional Review Board (Protocol #826185). A portion of all lymph nodes was fixed in formalin for hematopathology review of a hematoxylin and eosin-stained slide by an experienced hematopathologist (M.S.L. or A.B.). Six LNs are included in this study: three LNs processed as fresh tissue with a reactive histology that were compared to tonsils, and three LNs that were processed as fresh and cryopreserved tissue. Of the latter three LNs processed both as fresh and cryopreserved tissue, two had inflammatory histologies and were left fresh or cryopreserved for two days. One of these had non-specific reactive changes while the other had a histologic appearance resembling hyaline vascular Castleman Disease. The third LN included an atypical T lymphocytic expansion and was processed both fresh on the day of surgical resection and after 18 months of cryopreservation.

Whole-tissue cryopreservation and thawing

First, tonsils were cut with a scalpel into 2–3 mm pieces as described above. Next, fragments were gently stirred to prevent selection biases from overrepresentation of any part of the tonsil. After mixing, 8–10 pieces (ca. 150mg total) were placed in each cryovial containing 1mL Cryostor CS10 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) or 1mL 90% FBS/10% DMSO and placed in Corning CoolCell LX Cell Freezing Container (Sigma Aldrich) for storage in a −80°C freezer. Cryotubes were thawed in 37°C water baths and samples were transferred to 5mL FACS tubes where they were washed three times in RPMI with 2% FBS before addition of enzymatic digestion solution. At least three cryovials were used to generate sufficient digested cells so that 10,000 sorted CD45 EpCAM cells could be loaded into the Chromium Controller (see below).

Enzymatic digestion of tonsils

Fresh or thawed cryopreserved samples were incubated in 37°C water bath with 3mL enzymatic digestion solution. Enzymatic digestion of fresh or thawed, cryopreserved tissue was performed otherwise similarly to prior descriptions (32, 33). An enzymatic medium was prepared by adding 2 mg/mL dispase II (Gibco), 0.6 mg/ml collagenase P (Sigma Aldrich), and 0.3 mg/mL DNase I (Sigma Aldrich) to pre-warmed RPMI with 2% FBS and 20mM HEPES. Every 10 minutes, samples were agitated by pipetting using a 1000μl micropipette. Every 15 minutes, the digestion medium with cells in suspension was aspirated, transferred through 70μm filters to 20mL ice-cold FACS buffer (PBS containing 2% FBS, 20mM HEPES, and 2mM EDTA) before being spun at 1500rpm for 5 minutes and resuspended in fresh FACS buffer. Fresh digestion medium was immediately added to the residual tissue for a total of three serial, 15-minute digestions.

Flow Cytometry Antibodies

For flow cytometry, the following antibodies were used: anti-CD45 APCFire750 (clone HI30, Biolegend, 1:100), anti-EpCAM APCFire750 (clone 9C4, Biolegend, 1:100), anti-podoplanin PE-Cy7 (clone NC-08, Biolegend, 1:200), and anti-CD31 PerCP Cy5.5 (clone WM59, Biolegend, 1:200). DAPI (Sigma Aldrich) at 10μg/mL final concentration was added immediately before sorting for live-dead cell discrimination.

Low-pressure flow cytometry and cell sorting

Flow cytometric cell sorting was performed with the FACSDIVA software on a BD FACSAria (Franklin Lakes, NJ) set to 20 psi with a 100μm nozzle. The sorting protocol was as previously described, although we did not require any bead-based enrichment prior to sorting and could compensate successfully with antibody-stained UltraComp eBeads Compensation Beads (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) (32). We sorted ≥ 30,000 CD45 EpCAM live singlet cells into 1.5mL DNA LoBind tubes (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) containing 40μl FBS. Purity was routinely > 95%. Tubes were spin-concentrated with only a part of the supernatant removed by gentle aspiration to leave ~50μl volume in the tube. The concentrated cells were then fully resuspended in the remaining volume and counted with a hemacytometer using a Trypan Blue viability dye. Flow cytometric analysis was performed using FlowJo v.10.6.1 (Ashland, OR).

Single-cell RNAseq library preparation and sequencing

Sorted cells were loaded into a 10X Chromium Controller and next-generation sequencing libraries were built using Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3’ GEM, Library, & Gel Bead Kit v3.1 kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (10X Genomics, Pleasanton, CA). After sorting, 10,000 cells were loaded per sample into the Chromium Controller and captured in gel bead emulsions. The mRNA was reverse transcribed and the cDNA was amplified for 11 cycles with manufacturer-supplied primers. Libraries were then constructed through fragmentation, adapter ligation, and a sample indexing PCR with double-sided size selection using SPRIselect beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA). All samples were quantified by Qubit High-sensitivity DNA fluorometry (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and checked for library quality by TapeStation High-sensitivity D5000 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Indexed samples were pooled, denatured, and diluted to 1.8pM before being loaded onto a NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 (150 cycles, Illumina, San Diego, CA) for paired-end sequencing on a NextSeq 550 (Illumina).

Bioinformatic analysis

Raw sequencing files were aligned to the Ensembl human GRCh38 reference genome in Cell Ranger software (v.3.1.0, 10X Genomics) (34). Quality control was performed in R (v.4.2.0) with the Seurat R package (v.4.1.1) in order to remove damaged cells or doublets/multiplets based on high or low UMI counts (filtering out feature counts over 3,000 or less than 200) or high percent mitochondrial genes (filtering out cells with > 15% mitochondrial counts) (35). Cells that had positive read counts between 200 and 3000 and percent mitochondrial genes less than 15% were retained. Cells expressing leukocyte-specific (CD3E, PTPRC, CD79A, MZB1, CCR7, CD7, CD52) or epithelial marker genes (KRT5, KRT15, and KRT17) or MKI67 were also removed. After quality control to remove damaged and contaminating cells, the final dataset included 22,691 human non-hematopoietic tonsillar cells across samples for downstream analysis. Downstream analysis was performed with the Seurat R package (v.4.1.1) with normalization, scaling, dimensionality reduction with PCA and UMAP, and clustering (34). Clusters were labeled based on calculated cluster-defining gene expression and known markers reported in previous publications (2, 17, 35).

Following cluster identification, individual samples were compared based on how the upstream tissue was processed (fresh vs. different cryopreservation strategies as described above). This comparison was done by determining the proportion of each cluster that accounts for the total cells in each sample. In this way, differentially abundant cell-types that may have weathered cryopreservation relatively less well or better could be identified compared with cells from freshly processed samples. Additionally, the Milo framework for differential abundance testing was employed (36, 37). The milo package constructs a KNN graph (k = 30, p = 0.1) to assign cells to neighborhoods distinct from Seurat-defined clusters. Individual neighborhoods were assigned cell-type labels based on Seurat-defined clusters on the basis of the majority of cells in that neighborhood.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Tissues were embedded in FSC 22 Clear (Leica Biosystems), fresh frozen in an isopropanol-dry ice bath and stored at −80°C. 10 μm sections were cut with a cryostat (Leica CM1950) and mounted onto Thermo slides and fixed for 10 min in methanol at −20°C. Mounted tissues were then blocked with PBS containing 10% FCS, 1 mg/ml anti-Fcγ receptor (BD Biosciences) and 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) at 4°C for 2 hours. These slides were incubated overnight with anti-human CD34 FITC (Clone 581, Biolegend 343504, 1:200), anti-human/mouse ACTA2 Cy3 (Clone 1A4, Sigma C6198, 1:1000), anti-human CD31 A647 (Clone WM59, Biolegend 303112, 1:100) or unconjugated anti-human CCL19 (polyclonal, R&D AF361-SP, 1:200) that was detected with anti-goat IgG A488 (Jackson Immunoresearch 705-545-003, 1:1000) and unconjugated anti-human PDPN (Clone NZ-1.3, eBioscience 14-9381-82, 1:200) that was detected with anti-rat IgG A647 (Jackson Immunoresearch 712-605-153, 1:1000) secondary antibodies. Microscopy was performed using a confocal microscope (LSM-980, Carl Zeiss), and images were recorded and processed with ZEN 2010 software (Carl Zeiss). Imaris Version 9 (Bitplane) was used for image analysis.

RNA-Scope

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned to 5 μm using a microtome (Leica RM2255). Assays for CCL19 and FDCSP mRNA (Catalog 474361 and 444231, respectively, Advanced Cell Diagnostics) were used according to the manufacturer’s RNA-Scope TM Multiplex Fluorescent v2 kit instructions (Advanced Cell Diagnostics). Images were obtained using a confocal microscope (LSM-780, Zeiss) and images were recorded and processed with ZEN 2012 software (Zeiss). ImageJ 1.49v software (Wayne Rasband) was used for image analysis, rendering, masking, and reconstruction.

Statistics

Statistical comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-tests where p < 0.05 was considered significant using GraphPad Prism. Linear regression and Pearson correlations were calculated using the stats and ggplot2 packages, respectively, in the R programing environment. To compare differential gene expression, a linear regression was fitted to data comparing the normalized log2-transformed gene expression of the comparison groups. A gene was considered differentially expressed if it was one standard deviation off the fitted line as defined by an absolute residual > 1. Statistics related to differential abundance analysis were made using the milo package in the R programming environment (36). Neighborhoods were considered differentially abundant when spatialFDR was < 0.1, logFC > or < 0, and Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p-value < 0.05.

Supplementary Material

Fig S1-S7

Acknowledgements:

J.D.B. is supported by a Doris Duke Foundation’s Physician Scientist Fellowship and American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy New Investigator Award. J.D.B. previously received support from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Young Investigator Award and American Society of Hematology Research Training Award for Fellows. Additional support was from NHLBI (T32-HL07439 to J.D.B.) and the NCI (T32-CA009140 to B.T.G.). This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01-AI091627 to I.M., R01-HL141408 to D.C.F.).

Conflict-of-interest disclosures:

J.D.B. has consulted for EUSA Pharma. I.M. has received research funding from Genentech and Regeneron, and he is a member of Garuda Therapeutics’ scientific advisory board. J.C.A. has consulted for Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Cellestia, Inc., and Remix Therapeutics. All conflicts are unrelated to the contents of this manuscript.

Abbreviations:

LNSC

Lymph node stromal cell

LN

Lymph node

VSMC

Vascular smooth muscle cell

TRC

T cell zone reticular cell

PRC

Perivascular reticular cell

BRC

B cell-interacting reticular cell

FDC

Follicular dendritic cell

scRNAseq

Single-cell RNA sequencing

Footnotes

Ethics approval

The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Tonsil use was approved by a material transfer agreement between the University of Pennsylvania and Children’s’ Hospital of Philadelphia (ID: 58590/00). All tonsils were received without any protected health information or identifiers, exempt from review by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Institutional Review Board (SOP 407, Section XII “Secondary Use of De-Identified Data or Specimens”). All lymph nodes were received after patient provided consent as part of a University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board protocol (#826185).

Data sharing statement

All de-identified data generated or analyzed are available in the main text, supplementary materials, or in the Gene Expression Omnibus (accession GSE224661, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE224661).

References

  • 1.Buechler MB, Turley SJ. A short field guide to fibroblast function in immunity. Seminars in Immunology. 2018;35:48–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pikor NB, Cheng HW, Onder L, Ludewig B. Development and Immunological Function of Lymph Node Stromal Cells. J Immunol. 2021;206(2):257–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chai Q, Onder L, Scandella E, Gil-Cruz C, Perez-Shibayama C, Cupovic J, Danuser R, Sparwasser T, Luther SA, Thiel V, Rülicke T, Stein JV, Hehlgans T, Ludewig B. Maturation of Lymph Node Fibroblastic Reticular Cells from Myofibroblastic Precursors Is Critical for Antiviral Immunity. Immunity. 2013;38(5):1013–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gil-Cruz C, Perez-Shibayama C, Onder L, Chai Q, Cupovic J, Cheng HW, Novkovic M, Lang PA, Geuking MB, McCoy KD, Abe S, Cui G, Ikuta K, Scandella E, Ludewig B. Fibroblastic reticular cells regulate intestinal inflammation via IL-15-mediated control of group 1 ILCs. Nature Immunology. 2016;17(12):1388–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Perez-Shibayama C, Gil-Cruz C, Cheng HW, Onder L, Printz A, Morbe U, Novkovic M, Li C, Lopez-Macias C, Buechler MB, Turley SJ, Mack M, Soneson C, Robinson MD, Scandella E, Gommerman J, Ludewig B. Fibroblastic reticular cells initiate immune responses in visceral adipose tissues and secure peritoneal immunity. Sci Immunol. 2018;3(26). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brown FD, Sen DR, LaFleur MW, Godec J, Lukacs-Kornek V, Schildberg FA, Kim HJ, Yates KB, Ricoult SJH, Bi K, Trombley JD, Kapoor VN, Stanley IA, Cremasco V, Danial NN, Manning BD, Sharpe AH, Haining WN, Turley SJ. Fibroblastic reticular cells enhance T cell metabolism and survival via epigenetic remodeling. Nature Immunology 2019 20:12. 2019;20(12):1668–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fletcher AL, Lukacs-Kornek V, Reynoso ED, Pinner SE, Bellemare-Pelletier A, Curry MS, Collier A-R, Boyd RL, Turley SJ. Lymph node fibroblastic reticular cells directly present peripheral tissue antigen under steady-state and inflammatory conditions. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2010;207(4):689–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Malhotra D, Fletcher AL, Astarita J, Lukacs-Kornek V, Tayalia P, Gonzalez SF, Elpek KG, Chang SK, Knoblich K, Hemler ME, Brenner MB, Carroll MC, Mooney DJ, Turley SJ, Zhou Y, Shinton SA, Hardy RR, Bezman NA, Sun JC, Kim CC, Lanier LL, Miller J, Brown B, Merad M, Bellemare-Pelletier A, Narayan K, Sylvia K, Kang J, Gazit R, Garrison B, Rossi DJ, Jojic V, Koller D, Jianu R, Laidlaw D, Costello J, Collins J, Cohen N, Brennan P, Shay T, Regev A, Kim F, Rao TN, Wagers A, Gautier EL, Jakubzick C, Randolph GJ, Monach P, Best AJ, Knell J, Goldrath A, Heng T, Kreslavsky T, Painter M, Mathis D, Benoist C. Transcriptional profiling of stroma from inflamed and resting lymph nodes defines immunological hallmarks. Nature Immunology. 2012;13(5):499–510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Magnusson FC, Liblau RS, von Boehmer H, Pittet MJ, Lee JW, Turley SJ, Khazaie K. Direct Presentation of Antigen by Lymph Node Stromal Cells Protects Against CD8 T-Cell-Mediated Intestinal Autoimmunity. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(4):1028–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chung J, Ebens CL, Perkey E, Radojcic V, Koch U, Scarpellino L, Tong A, Allen F, Wood S, Feng J, Friedman A, Granadier D, Tran IT, Chai Q, Onder L, Yan M, Reddy P, Blazar BR, Huang AY, Brennan TV, Bishop DK, Ludewig B, Siebel CW, Radtke F, Luther SA, Maillard I. Fibroblastic niches prime T cell alloimmunity through Delta-like Notch ligands. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2017;127(4):1574–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mourcin F, Verdière L, Roulois D, Amin R, Lamaison C, Sibut V, Thamphya B, Pangault C, Monvoisin C, Huet S, Seffals M, Baulande S, Mechta-Grigoriou F, Legoix P, Rossille D, Guirriec M, Léonard S, Cartron G, Salles G, Fest T, Tarte K. Follicular lymphoma triggers phenotypic and functional remodeling of the human lymphoid stromal cell landscape. Immunity. 2021;54(8):1788–806.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Biasci D, Thaventhiran J, Tavaré S. Fibroblastic reticular cells predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. bioRxiv. 2020:2020.02.19.955666–2020.02.19. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Abe Y, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, Fujisawa M, Miyoshi H, Suehara Y, Hattori K, Kusakabe M, Sakamoto T, Nishikii H, Nguyen TB, Owada Y, Enomoto T, Sawa A, Bando H, Yoshida C, Tabata R, Terao T, Nakayama M, Ohshima K, Usuki K, Oda T, Matsue K, Chiba S. A single-cell atlas of non-haematopoietic cells in human lymph nodes and lymphoma reveals a landscape of stromal remodelling. Nature Cell Biology. 2022;24(4):565–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rodda LB, Lu E, Bennett ML, Sokol CL, Wang X, Luther SA, Barres BA, Luster AD, Ye CJ, Cyster JG. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Lymph Node Stromal Cells Reveals Niche-Associated Heterogeneity. Immunity. 2018;48(5):1014–28.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Takeda A, Hollmen M, Dermadi D, Pan J, Brulois KF, Kaukonen R, Lonnberg T, Bostrom P, Koskivuo I, Irjala H, Miyasaka M, Salmi M, Butcher EC, Jalkanen S. Single-Cell Survey of Human Lymphatics Unveils Marked Endothelial Cell Heterogeneity and Mechanisms of Homing for Neutrophils. Immunity. 2019;51(3):561–72 e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pikor NB, Morbe U, Lutge M, Gil-Cruz C, Perez-Shibayama C, Novkovic M, Cheng HW, Nombela-Arrieta C, Nagasawa T, Linterman MA, Onder L, Ludewig B. Remodeling of light and dark zone follicular dendritic cells governs germinal center responses. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(6):649–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cheng HW, Onder L, Novkovic M, Soneson C, Lütge M, Pikor N, Scandella E, Robinson MD, Miyazaki Ji, Tersteegen A, Sorg K, Pfeffer U, Rü, licke T, Hehlgans T, Ludewig B. Origin and differentiation trajectories of fibroblastic reticular cells in the splenic white pulp. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):1739-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alexandre YO, Schienstock D, Lee HJ, Gandolfo LC, Williams CG, Devi S, Pal B, Groom JR, Cao W, Christo SN, Gordon CL, Starkey G, D’Costa R, Mackay LK, Haque A, Ludewig B, Belz GT, Mueller SN. A diverse fibroblastic stromal cell landscape in the spleen directs tissue homeostasis and immunity. Sci Immunol. 2022;7(67):eabj0641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fujimoto N, He Y, D’Addio M, Tacconi C, Detmar M, Dieterich LC. Single-cell mapping reveals new markers and functions of lymphatic endothelial cells in lymph nodes. PLOS Biology. 2020;18(4):e3000704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kapoor VN, Muller S, Keerthivasan S, Brown M, Chalouni C, Storm EE, Castiglioni A, Lane R, Nitschke M, Dominguez CX, Astarita JL, Krishnamurty AT, Carbone CB, Senbabaoglu Y, Wang AW, Wu X, Cremasco V, Roose-Girma M, Tam L, Doerr J, Chen MZ, Lee WP, Modrusan Z, Yang YA, Bourgon R, Sandoval W, Shaw AS, de Sauvage FJ, Mellman I, Moussion C, Turley SJ. Gremlin 1(+) fibroblastic niche maintains dendritic cell homeostasis in lymphoid tissues. Nat Immunol. 2021;22(5):571–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Knoblich K, Cruz Migoni S, Siew SM, Jinks E, Kaul B, Jeffery HC, Baker AT, Suliman M, Vrzalikova K, Mehenna H, Murray PG, Barone F, Oo YH, Newsome PN, Hirschfield G, Kelly D, Lee SP, Parekkadan B, Turley SJ, Fletcher AL. The human lymph node microenvironment unilaterally regulates T-cell activation and differentiation. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(9):e2005046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Heesters BA, Van Megesen K, Tomris I, De Vries RP, Magri G, Spits H. Characterization of human FDCs reveals regulation of T cells and antigen presentation to B cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2021;218(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chiba S, Sakata-Yanagimoto M. Advances in understanding of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Leukemia. 2020;34:2592–606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fajgenbaum DC, Uldrick TS, Bagg A, Frank D, Wu D, Srkalovic G, Simpson D, Liu AY, Menke D, Chandrakasan S, Lechowicz MJ, Wong RSM, Pierson S, Paessler M, Rossi J-F, Ide M, Ruth J, Croglio M, Suarez A, Krymskaya V, Chadburn A, Colleoni G, Nasta S, Jayanthan R, Nabel CS, Casper C, Dispenzieri A, Fosså A, Kelleher D, Kurzrock R, Voorhees P, Dogan A, Yoshizaki K, van Rhee F, Oksenhendler E, Jaffe ES, Elenitoba-Johnson KSJ, Lim MS. International, evidence-based consensus diagnostic criteria for HHV-8-negative/idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease. Blood. 2017;129(12):1646–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fajgenbaum DC, Shilling D. Castleman Disease Pathogenesis. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America. 2018;32(1):11–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chang K-C, Wang Y-C, Hung L-Y, Huang W-T, Tsou J-H, M Jones D, Song H-L, Yeh Y-M, Kao L-Y, Medeiros LJ. Monoclonality and cytogenetic abnormalities in hyaline vascular Castleman disease. Modern Pathology. 2014;27(6):823–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li Z, Lan X, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Xue W, Lu L, Jin M, Zhou Z, Wang X, Li L, Zhang L, Li X, Fu X, Sun Z, Wu J, Zhang X, Yu H, Nan F, Chang Y, Yan J, Wu X, Wang G, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Young KH, Zhang M. Recurrent PDGFRB mutations in unicentric Castleman disease. Leukemia. 2019;33(4):1035–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Grindberg RV, Yee-Greenbaum JL, McConnell MJ, Novotny M, O’Shaughnessy AL, Lambert GM, Araúzo-Bravo MJ, Lee J, Fishman M, Robbins GE, Lin X, Venepally P, Badger JH, Galbraith DW, Gage FH, Lasken RS. RNA-sequencing from single nuclei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(49):19802–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ding J, Adiconis X, Simmons SK, Kowalczyk MS, Hession CC, Marjanovic ND, Hughes TK, Wadsworth MH, Burks T, Nguyen LT, Kwon JYH, Barak B, Ge W, Kedaigle AJ, Carroll S, Li S, Hacohen N, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Shalek AK, Villani A-C, Regev A, Levin JZ. Systematic comparison of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing methods. Nature Biotechnology. 2020;38(6):737–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lake BB, Ai R, Kaeser GE, Salathia NS, Yung YC, Liu R, Wildberg A, Gao D, Fung H-L, Chen S, Vijayaraghavan R, Wong J, Chen A, Sheng X, Kaper F, Shen R, Ronaghi M, Fan J-B, Wang W, Chun J, Zhang K. Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Science. 2016;352(6293):1586–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lake BB, Codeluppi S, Yung YC, Gao D, Chun J, Kharchenko PV, Linnarsson S, Zhang K. A comparative strategy for single-nucleus and single-cell transcriptomes confirms accuracy in predicted cell-type expression from nuclear RNA. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fletcher AL, Malhotra D, Acton SE, Lukacs-Kornek V, Bellemare-Pelletier A, Curry M, Armant M, Turley SJ. Reproducible isolation of lymph node stromal cells reveals site-dependent differences in fibroblastic reticular cells. Frontiers in Immunology. 2011;2(SEP):1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bar-Ephraim YE, Konijn T, Gonultas M, Mebius RE, Reijmers RM. A Reproducible Method for Isolation and In Vitro Culture of Functional Human Lymphoid Stromal Cells from Tonsils. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0167555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(5):411–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Prados A, Onder L, Cheng HW, Morbe U, Lutge M, Gil-Cruz C, Perez-Shibayama C, Koliaraki V, Ludewig B, Kollias G. Fibroblastic reticular cell lineage convergence in Peyer’s patches governs intestinal immunity. Nat Immunol. 2021;22(4):510–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dann E, Henderson NC, Teichmann SA, Morgan MD, Marioni JC. Differential abundance testing on single-cell data using k-nearest neighbor graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40(2):245–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Suo C, Dann E, Goh I, Jardine L, Kleshchevnikov V, Park JE, Botting RA, Stephenson E, Engelbert J, Tuong ZK, Polanski K, Yayon N, Xu C, Suchanek O, Elmentaite R, Dominguez Conde C, He P, Pritchard S, Miah M, Moldovan C, Steemers AS, Mazin P, Prete M, Horsfall D, Marioni JC, Clatworthy MR, Haniffa M, Teichmann SA. Mapping the developing human immune system across organs. Science. 2022;376(6597):eabo0510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig S1-S7

Data Availability Statement

All de-identified data generated or analyzed are available in the main text, supplementary materials, or in the Gene Expression Omnibus (accession GSE224661, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE224661).

RESOURCES