SUMMARY
Selective clearance of organelles, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria, by autophagy plays an important role in cell health. Here we describe a developmentally programmed selective ER clearance by autophagy. We show that Parkinson’s disease associated PINK1, as well as Atl, Rtnl1 and Trp1 receptors, regulate ER clearance by autophagy. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin functions downstream of PINK1 and is required for mitochondrial clearance while having the opposite function in ER clearance. By contrast, Keap1 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cullin3 function downstream of PINK1 to regulate ER clearance by influencing Rtnl1 and Atl. PINK1 regulates a change in Keap1 localization and Keap1-dependent ubiquitylation of the ER-phagy receptor Rtnl1 to facilitate ER clearance. Thus, PINK1 regulates the selective clearance of ER and mitochondria by influencing the balance of Keap1- and Parkin-dependent ubiquitylation of substrates that determine which organelle is removed by autophagy.
Graphical Abstract
In Brief
Investigation into the clearance of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) during fly intestine development unveils a crosstalk between mitophagy and ER-phagy, and provides mechanistic insights into autophagy-mediated cross-organelle remodeling that is important for cell- and organism- health.
INTRODUCTION
Macroautophagy (autophagy) is a catabolic process that facilitates the degradation of either bulk non-specific cytoplasmic components or specific cytoplasmic cargoes, including mitochondria and ER, by delivery to lysosomes. The selective removal of each type of organelle by autophagy depends on specific initiation signals and receptors1,2. For example, the clearance of mitochondria by autophagy (mitophagy) is triggered when stimuli induce stabilization of the PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) on the surface of mitochondria3. PINK1 then phosphorylates ubiquitin and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin on mitochondria4,5, thus marking mitochondria and associated proteins with ubiquitin to target them for degradation by autophagy6–9.
The recruitment of mitochondria into forming autophagosomes depends on receptors that bind to both ubiquitin and the core autophagy protein LC3/GABARAP (Atg8 in lower organisms)10,11. Similarly, selective clearance of ER by autophagy (ER-phagy) requires receptors for recruitment of ER into forming autophagosomes12–19. Importantly, the signal and receptor codes that mediate and distinguish selective mitophagy from ER-phagy are thought to be unique for mitochondria and ER.
The mechanisms that distinguish mitophagy and ER-phagy within a single cell has been challenging. This is because of limitations in the availability of physiological models to study the clearance of specific organelles within a single cell. In addition, the mechanisms that control organelle-specific autophagy is largely based on the use of chemicals that stress either mitochondria or ER in cultured cells. It remains unclear if different autophagy cargoes are cleared by distinct programs within the same cell, and how organelle-specific genetic regulatory programs influence one another.
Here we show that mitochondria and ER are differentially cleared by autophagy in a single cell during development in the Drosophila intestine. Although mitochondria and ER require common autophagy genes for clearance, each organelle utilizes specific receptors for removal. Mitochondrial PINK1 is required for ER-phagy even though it is thought to specifically influence mitophagy. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin that functions downstream of PINK1 in mitophagy has the opposite function in ER-phagy. By contrast, the Keap1 and Cullin3 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex is required for ER-phagy downstream of PINK1. PINK1 influences the localization of Keap1, and PINK1 and Keap1 are required for ubiquitylation of the ER-phagy receptor Rtnl1. Our data indicates that PINK1 regulates the clearance of ER and mitochondria, and organelle-specificity is achieved through the functions of either Keap1 or Parkin.
RESULTS
ER clearance is regulated by autophagy during development
A rise in steroid triggers the development from a larva to prepupa in Drosophila, and induces autophagy in enterocyte cells of the intestine anterior midgut20. This autophagy is specific to enterocytes, and is required for cell size reduction. Mitochondria are removed in an autophagy (Atg) gene-dependent manner from enterocytes20,21. However, it is unclear if ER is cleared by autophagy from enterocytes. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses of control enterocytes 2 hours after puparium formation (APF) revealed autophagosomes that contain rough ER (Figure 1A). By contrast, Atg8aΔ mutant intestine enterocytes exhibit decreased autophagosome structures and possess numerous dilated ER structures (Figure 1B and 1C, Figure S1A–S1B). The presence of dilated ER in Atg8a mutant cells is consistent with the ER morphology observed in ER-phagy receptor deficient mammalian cells12.
To investigate whether ER degradation requires autophagy in Drosophila intestine cells, we examined ER-localized Sec61α-GFP reporter clearance in autophagy mutant enterocytes 2 hours APF. Cells lacking the function of either Atg9, Atg16, or Vps34 exhibit increased levels of Sec61α-GFP compared to neighboring control cells (Figure 1D–1G, Figure S1C–S1D). Consistent with loss of autophagy, Atg9d51, Atg16Δ and Vps34m22mutant intestine cells possessed increased levels of the autophagy receptor and substrate Ref(2)p (p62 in mammals), and elevated levels of the ER-localized Calnexin protein compared to neighboring control cells (Figure S1E–S1J). Similarly, Calnexin protein levels increased in Atg1 and Atg9 knockdown intestines compared to control intestines expressing Luciferase RNAi (Figure 1H and 1I). Additionally, homozygous Atg16 Δ mutant intestines possess 55% more Calnexin protein compared to control w1118 intestines (Figure 1J and 1K).
We constructed an ER-phagy sensor to investigate the dynamics of ER autophagic flux. Tandem fluorochromes, including modified pH sensitive pHluorin and pH resistant mKate2, were fused in between the ER-targeting sequence of Bip and a KDEL-ER retention signal, and placed under control of a UAS promoter (UAS-ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5, Figure 1L) to measure ER-phagy in the intestine. Both green and red fluorochromes of the sensor exhibit ER-like structures in third instar larval intestine cells before the initiation of autophagy (Figure S1K)20. Additionally, ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 levels in Atg16Δ mutant larval intestines are similar to control intestines (Figure S1L–S1M). After activation of autophagy, the ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-containing ER fragments are delivered to autophagosomes followed by fusion with lysosomes, causing a lack of green fluorescence due to the acidic nature of autolysosomes (Figure 1M). Consistent with the requirement for autophagy in ER clearance, ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 reporter levels are elevated in Atg16Δ mutant enterocytes compared to control intestine cells 2 hours APF (Figure S1L–S1M). Importantly, the smaller control intestine enterocytes (Figure 1N, yellow rectangles in lower magnification images and upper panels in insets) exhibit increased ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localization with lysotracker-stained lysosomes and contain less ss-pHluorin-KDEL (Figure 1N and 1O). By contrast, either Atg9d51 or Atg16Δ mutant enterocytes are larger in size, contain more ss-pHluorin-KDEL and possess decreased ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localization with lysotracker compared to control cells 2 hours APF (Figure 1N and 1O, Figure S1N–S1O).
Selective clearance of organelles requires both common genes and distinct receptors
To investigate whether ER clearance in the Drosophila intestine is selective, we queried the Drosophila melanogaster genome for ER-phagy receptors using an orthologue prediction tool22. Orthologues of the mammalian ER-phagy receptors ATL3, RTN3 and Sec62 are conserved and encoded by Atl, Rtnl1 and Trp1 (Figure S2A). By contrast, ER-phagy receptors FAM134B, CCPG1, TEX264 and CALCOCO1 do not possess clear fly orthologues. Significantly, Atl2, Rtnl11W and Trp1KG mutant intestine cells possess increased Sec61α-GFP ER reporter levels compared to control cells (Figure 2A–2F). In addition, Atl, Rtnl1 and Trp1 proteins interact with Atg8a in vitro (Figure 2G). Consistent with roles as ER-phagy receptors, Atl and Trp1 interact with Atg8a through putative LC3-interacting region (LIR) motifs (Figure S2B–S2G).
We investigated whether Rtnl1 and Atl proteins are influenced by autophagy. Antibodies do not exist against Drosophila ER-phagy receptors. Thus, we used CRISPR-Cas9 to tag the C-termini of both Rtnl1 and Atl with 3×Flag-V5 (Figure S2H–S2I) to enable detection of all isoforms of these ER-phagy receptors. Loss of either Atg8a or Atg16 resulted in failure to clear Rtnl1 compared to control enterocytes 2 hours APF (Figure 2H–2K). Similarly, enterocyte cell loss of either Atg9 or Atg8a resulted in failure to clear Atl compared to control cells 2 hours APF (Figure 2L–2O). Interestingly, loss of Atl mutant intestine cells exhibit an increase in Rtnl1 and Calnexin (Figure S2J–S2K). Furthermore, TEM analyses of either Atl2 or Rtnl11W mutant intestine enterocytes revealed increased amounts of interconnected and elongated rough ER structures in the cytoplasm that are similar to the influence of RTN3 on ER morphology in mammals15, while control cells possessed rough ER in autophagic structures (Figure 2P–2S).
The selective recruitment of autophagic cargoes is thought to be defined by specific receptor combinations1,2, but no studies have tested this model in a single cell in an animal. Since both mitochondria and ER clearance occur in the same intestine cell context during developmental autophagy20,21 (Figure 1), we compared the specificities of autophagy receptors in selective mitophagy and ER-phagy. Vps13D has characteristics of an autophagy receptor23, is required for clearance of mitochondria21,23, influences mitochondria ER contact24, and ER morphology25. Consistent with previous work21,23, Vps13DMI mutant intestine cells exhibit increased mitochondrial Mito-GFP puncta compared to control enterocytes (Figure 3A, 3A”, and 3B). Significantly, the ER protein Calnexin is elevated in the same Vps13DMI loss-of-function intestine cells compared to neighboring control cells (Figure 3A’, 3A”, and 3C), thus Vps13D is required for both mitophagy and ER-phagy in the same cell. Vps13D knockdown cells also exhibit increased Sec61α-GFP compared to control cells (Figure S3A–S3B). In addition, TEM analyses of Vps13D mutant intestine cells accumulate dilated ER compared to control enterocytes (Figure S3C–S3D). These data indicate that ER-phagy and mitophagy share common regulators.
We investigated the functions of the Rtnl1, Trp1 and Atl ER-phagy receptors in selective ER-phagy and mitophagy. Core autophagy Atg16-deficient intestine enterocytes fail to clear mitochondrial-localized Mito-GFP puncta (Figure 3D and 3H), similar to how Atg16 loss prevents ER clearance (Figure 1). By contrast, loss of either Rtnl11W, Trp1KG or Atl2 in mutant intestine enterocytes fails to impact Mito-GFP puncta clearance and have similar levels to their respective neighboring control cells (Figure 3E–3H). Therefore, core regulators of autophagy impact both mitochondria and ER clearance, while the Rtnl1, Trp1 and Atl receptors are specific to ER-phagy.
We next examined if the mammalian mitophagy receptor BNIP326 is conserved in Drosophila and functions to specifically regulate the clearance of mitochondria. BNIP3 is conserved in Drosophila, including two amino acids in the LIR motif that are required for BNIP3 to function as a mitophagy receptor (Figure S3E–S3F). Consistent with the function of BNIP3 in mammals26–28, fly BNIP3 gRNAs/Cas9-expressing enterocytes possess increased mitochondrial ATP5A compared to control enterocytes (Figure 3I, 3I”, and 3J). In contrast to the impact of BNIP3 on mitochondrial clearance, ER Sec61α-GFP levels are decreased in BNIP3 mutant compared to control intestine cells (Figure 3I’–3I” and 3K). In addition, ER-phagy flux is increased in BNIP3 mutant enterocytes compared to control intestine cells (Figure S3H–S3J). These results indicate that BNIP3 is required for mitophagy in the same cells where Rtnl1, Trp1 and Atl are specifically required for ER-phagy.
Developmentally programmed ER clearance requires PINK1
PINK1 appears to function upstream of Vps13D in the regulation of mitophagy in intestine enterocytes21. Since Vps13D influences the clearance of both mitochondria and ER, we tested the influence of PINK1 on ER-phagy. Surprisingly, PINK1B9 mutant intestine enterocytes exhibit increased Sec61α-GFP and Calnexin compared to neighboring control cells (Figure 4A and 4D, Figure S4A–S4B). Similarly, PINK1 knockdown intestine cells expressing PINK1 RNAis exhibit elevated Sec61α-GFP compared to control cells (Figure S4C–S4F). In addition, Atg8aΔ loss-off-unction mutant intestine cells exhibit increased Sec61α-GFP compared to neighboring control enterocytes, and Atg8aΔ PINK1B9 double-mutant cells exhibit similar Sec61α-GFP levels as PINK1B9 and Atg8aΔ single-mutant intestine cells (Figure 4B–4D), indicating that PINK1 and Atg8a function in the same ER-phagy pathway. Consistent with a role in ER-phagy, PINK1B9 and PINK15 mutant intestine cells that express the ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 ER-phagy sensor exhibit decreased ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localization with lysotracker compared to control intestines (Figure S4G–S4J).
PINK1 is localized to and activated on mitochondria to regulate phosphorylation of ubiquitin (serine 65) and ubiquitination of multiple mitochondria-associated proteins7,9,10. Since PINK1 regulates clearance of both mitochondria and ER during development, we investigated if PINK1 expression and kinase activity changes in association with autophagy during development. To measure PINK1 levels in flies, we utilized a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged PINK1 that was created by making an in-frame fusion of GFP to the C-terminus of PINK1 (PINK1-GFP) by gene editing29. Interestingly, PINK1-GFP is increased 2 hours APF in both male and female intestines compared to respective staged larval controls (Figure S4K–S4L). However, we did not observe significant co-localization of PINK1-GFP with the ER-phagy receptor Rtnl1 (Figure S4M–S4N). Consistent with increased PINK1 levels at the stage when autophagy is induced, phosphorylation of the PINK1 substrate, ubiquitin serine 65, is increased after pupariation compared to larval intestines (Figure 4E and 4F). Furthermore, Atg8aΔ mutant intestines exhibit elevated levels of phosphorylated ubiquitin compared to control intestines after pupariation (Figure 4E and 4F), suggesting that PINK1 is activated during development and autophagy influences phospho-ubiquitin levels. Importantly, PINK1B9 single mutant and PINK1B9Atg8aΔ double mutant intestines lack phosphorylated ubiquitin (Figure 4E and 4F). In addition, PINK1B9 single mutant intestines possess similar levels of Ref(2)p compared to control intestines after pupariation, and PINK1B9Atg8aΔ double mutant intestines possess similar Ref(2)p levels compared to Atg8aΔ single mutant intestines (Figure 4E and 4G).
To investigate if PINK1 regulates ER-phagy through receptors, we tested if Rtnl1 and Atl are altered by PINK1 loss in enterocytes. Interestingly, PINK1B9 mutant cells possess decreased Rtnl1–3×Flag-V5 levels (Figure 4H and 4I), and increased Atl-3×Flag-V5 levels (Figure 4J and 4K) compared to neighboring control enterocytes 2 hours APF. Consistent with these data, 28 kDa and 41 kDa Rtnl1 protein levels are decreased in homozygous PINK1 mutant compared to control intestines 2 hours APF (Figure 4L–4N). A long exposure revealed a high molecular weight Rtnl1 protein smear that was decreased in PINK1 mutant compared to control intestines (Figure 4L and 4O). In contrast to the decrease in Rtnl1 proteins, Atl is increased in PINK1 mutant compared to control intestines 2 hours APF (Figure 4L and 4P). These data indicate that PINK1 influences ER-phagy receptor levels.
Parkin has an opposite function from PINK1 in ER clearance
The E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin is activated by PINK1 to facilitate ubiquitylation of proteins associated with mitochondria during mitophagy2. Parkin also functions downstream of PINK1 in Drosophila30,31. Since the levels of both PINK1 and phosphorylation of its substrate ubiquitin are elevated during autophagy in the intestine (Figure 4), we tested if Parkin has a similar function to PINK1 in ER-phagy. ParkΔ mutant (Figure S5A) intestine enterocytes possess elevated markers of mitochondria, including ATP5A and Mito-GFP, compared to control cells (Figure S5B–S5G). Surprisingly, ParkΔ mutant intestine enterocytes exhibit decreased Calnexin intensity and elevated levels of phospho-ubiquitin in the cytoplasm compared to control enterocytes (Figure 5A and 5B, Figure S5D–S5G). Interestingly, ParkΔ mutant enterocytes exhibit elevated levels of PINK1 puncta, and more PINK1 puncta co-localize with mitochondria compared to neighboring control cells (Figure S5H and S5I). ParkΔ mutant intestine cells also possess similar levels of pan-ubiquitin that localize with mitochondria compared to neighboring control cells (Figure S5J–S5K).
Our data indicate that Parkin has the opposite phenotype of PINK1 in the regulation of ER clearance by autophagy in the intestine. Therefore, investigated how Parkin influences the Rtnl1 and Atl ER-phagy receptors. Rtnl1 was localized in more distinct puncta in Parkin mutant enterocytes than control cells, and elevated levels of phosphorylated ubiquitin partly co-localize with Rtnl1 in Parkin mutant compared to neighboring control enterocytes (Figure 5C–5D). In addition, Rtnl1 co-localization with Atg8a was increased in Parkin mutant compared to control intestines at 2 hours APF (Figure 5E–5G). By contrast, Atl appeared similar between Parkin mutant and control cells, and also had elevated phosphorylated ubiquitin with increased co-localization with Atl (Figure S5L–S5M). Similarly, Park25 mutant intestines possess elevated levels of phosphorylated ubiquitin, and similar levels of pan-ubiquitin (Figure 5H–5J). Western blot analysis of ER-phagy receptors revealed that homozygous Parkin mutant intestines possess elevated Rtnl1 protein levels while Atl protein levels did not change (Figure 5K–5O). Thus, Parkin and PINK1 mutant intestines possess opposite influences on ER-phagy receptor levels.
We next investigated the influence of PINK1 and Parkin on the content of autophagosomes by TEM. TEM analyses revealed that PINK1B9 mutant intestine cells exhibit decreased ER-containing autophagosomes and autolysosomes compared to control intestine cells that possess autophagosomes that contain both ER and mitochondria (Figure 5P, 5Q, and 5S). In contrast to PINK1B9 mutant enterocytes, Park25 mutant intestine cells possess autophagosomes that contain ER, and are similar to control intestine cells (Figure 5Q–5S). These data reveal that in addition to their previously described functions in mitophagy, PINK1 and Parkin have opposing functions in ER clearance.
PINK1 and Keap1 function in a pathway to regulate ubiquitylation of Rtnl1 and ER-phagy
The distinct ER-phagy phenotypes of PINK1 and Parkin mutant intestine cells prompted us to consider if a different E3 ubiquitin ligase may be required for ER clearance. Kelch-like-ECH-associated-protein 1 (KEAP1) is part of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex with Cullin3 (Cul3) that is associated with autophagy and the autophagy receptor p62/Ref(2)p32,33. Therefore, we tested if Keap1 is required for ER clearance. Keap1036 mutant intestine enterocytes fail to clear ER, and possess increased Sec61α-GFP intensity and puncta that partially co-localized with Ref(2)p puncta compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF (Figure 6A and 6B). Since Keap1 is an adaptor in the Cul3 E3-ubiquitin ligase complex, we tested if Cul3 is required for ER clearance. Similar to Keap1 mutant cells, Cul3Δ mutant enterocytes possess increased Sec61α-GFP compared to control cells 2 hours APF (Figure 6C and 6D).
The Keap1 and Cul3 complex ubiquitylates Nrf2 (Cnc in flies) to target this transcriptional regulator of antioxidant stress response for degradation34–36. Consistent with previous studies, the Cnc-regulated antioxidant response element (ARE)-GFP reporter is activated in Keap1036 mutant intestine enterocytes (Figure S6A–S6B), suggesting that the Keap1-Cul3-Cnc signaling axis is conserved in enterocytes 2 hours APF. In contrast to Keap1 mutant enterocytes, cells lacking Cnc function fail to accumulate the autophagy receptor Ref(2)p (Figure S6C–S6E). Importantly, Keap1 and Cnc double mutant cells fail to modify Calnexin levels compared to Keap1 single mutant enterocytes (Figure S6F–S6H), suggesting that Keap1-Cul3 regulates ER clearance in a Cnc-independent manner in enterocytes.
We investigated the specificity of Keap1 in the regulation of ER-phagy. Consistent with a role in ER clearance, Keap1 mutant intestine enterocytes exhibit decreased ER-phagy flux as measured by the ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 sensor (Figure S6I–S6J). In contrast to the increase in ER-associated Calnexin in Keap1 mutant enterocytes, Mito-GFP puncta are decreased in Keap1 mutant compared to neighboring control cells (Figure 6E–6G). Importantly, Keap1 mutant cells exhibit increased conjugated ubiquitin puncta that co-localize with Ref(2)p puncta, but not with Mito-GFP puncta (Figure S6K–S6L). These data indicate that Keap1 is required for ER clearance.
Since Keap1 mutant cells appear to possess fewer mitochondria than control cells, we investigated the impact of Keap1 on mitophagy. We analyzed phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) using an antibody against double strand DNA (dsDNA) in Keap1 mutant and control intestine cells. Interestingly, Keap1 mutant cells exhibit decreased mtDNA puncta (dsDNA) that are co-localized with Mito-GFP puncta compared to neighboring control cells (Figure 6H and 6I). Importantly, this decrease in mtDNA puncta in Keap1 mutant cells is suppressed by loss of Atg16 function (Figure S6M–S6N). In addition, Keap1 mutant cells possess increased co-localization of phospho-ubiquitin puncta and Mito-GFP puncta compared to control cells (Figure 6H and 6J).
PINK1 and Keap1 mutant intestine cells possess similar defects in ER clearance. Therefore, we investigated the influence of Keap1 on ER-phagy receptors. Consistent with PINK1 mutants, Keap1 mutant enterocytes possess reduced Rtnl1 levels compared to control cells 2 hours APF (Figure 6K and 6L). In addition, Keap1 RNAi knockdown cells exhibit slightly increased Atl levels compared to neighboring control enterocytes (Figure 6M and 6N). Western blot analysis also revealed decreased Rtnl1 and increased Atl protein levels in intestines with reduced Keap1 function (Figure 6O–6S).
We next examined the relationship between PINK1 and Keap1 by measuring ER-phagy flux using the ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 sensor in Keap1 knockdown and PINK1 mutant intestines. Either Keap1 knockdown or homozygous PINK1B9 mutant intestines exhibit a comparable decrease in ER-phagy flux (Figure 7A–7C, and 7E). Significantly, intestines that express Keap1 RNAi in homozygous PINK1B9 mutant animals possess a similar decrease in ER-phagy flux compared to either Keap1 knockdown or PINK1 mutant intestines alone (Figure 7D and 7E). These data suggest that Keap1 and PINK1 are in the same pathway to regulate ER clearance.
To investigate how PINK1 and Parkin influence Keap1, we created tagged Keap1–3×Flag-V5 Drosophila by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing (Figure S7A). In Atg9 mutant enterocytes, Keap1 levels are slightly increased and co-localize with mitochondrial ATP5A puncta (Figure S7B–S7C). Interestingly, PINK1 mutant enterocytes possess enlarged Keap1 puncta that co-localize with mitochondrial ATP5A (Figure 7F and 7G). Although Parkin mutant enterocytes also possess elevated mitochondrial ATP5A, Keap1 levels are similar and mitochondria exhibit less co-localization with Keap1 compared to PINK1 mutant cells (Figure 7H and 7I). Furthermore, Parkin mutant cells possess increased co-localization of Keap1 with phosphorylated ubiquitin (Figure S7D–S7E). Although Keap1 protein is present in both PINK1 and Parkin mutant intestines, Keap1 is elevated in PINK1 mutants compared to both control and Parkin mutant intestines (Figure 7J and 7K). These data indicate that PINK1 influences Keap1 mitochondrial localization, and that Parkin is not required for Keap1 proximity with mitochondria.
PINK1 and Keap1 mutant cells have similar defects in ER clearance, as well as similar influences on Rtnl1 and Atl ER-phagy receptor levels. Interestingly, Parkin mutants possess opposite phenotypes to both PINK1 and Keap1. Given the high molecular weight Rtnl1 protein smear that was changed in PINK1, Parkin and Keap1 deficient intestines (Figure 4L and 4O, Figure 5J and 5M, and Figure 6O and 6R), we examined if this may reflect ubiquitylation of Rtnl1. Intestines were dissected from staged animals, followed by immunoprecipitation of Rtnl1, and immunoblotting for ubiquitin. Loss of PINK1 results in decreased ubiquitylation of Rtnl1 (Figure 7L and 7M). By contrast, Parkin mutant intestines possess increased Rtnl1 ubiquitylation compared to control intestines (Figure 7N and 7O). Consistent with PINK1, Keap1 knockdown intestines possess decreased Rtnl1 ubiquitylation compared to control intestines (Figure 7P and 7Q). These data indicate that PINK1 and Keap1 are required for Rtnl1 ubiquitylation, and that Parkin negatively regulates Rtnl1 ubiquitylation. Together, our data indicate that PINK1 regulates the clearance of ER and mitochondria by autophagy, and that Keap1 is required for ER-phagy while Parkin regulates mitophagy.
DISCUSSION
The ER provides membranes to form different vesicles, including autophagosomes37. In addition, ER contacts multiple organelles38, raising complexity in understanding how organelle relationships influence cell quality control. Mitochondria and ER are selectively removed by utilizing distinct proteins during intestine development. Specifically, the mitophagy receptor BNIP3 regulates mitochondria clearance, and the ER-phagy receptors Trp1, Atl and Rtnl1 regulate ER clearance.
PINK1 is a mitochondrial protein that phosphorylates ubiquitin to promote the recruitment of mitophagy components to mitochondria, including Parkin2. Interestingly, our data indicates that PINK1 is required for ER clearance. In contrast to PINK1 mutant cells that fail to clear ER, Parkin mutant cells possess decreased ER, and increased phosphorylated ubiquitin. Parkin is known to facilitate ubiquitylation of mitochondrial proteins during mitophagy2. Thus, Parkin influences the localization of PINK1-dependent phosphorylated ubiquitin to influence selective organelle clearance.
Cells lacking the E3 ubiquitin ligase component Keap1 have the same defect in ER-phagy as PINK1 mutant cells. In contrast to Parkin mutant cells that fail to clear mitochondria and have decreased ER, Keap1 mutant intestine cells fail to clear ER and possess decreased mitochondria. These opposing phenotypes indicate that PINK1 functions in divergent pathways to clear ER and mitochondria, with Keap1 regulating ER-phagy and Parkin controlling mitophagy. PINK1 is localized to mitochondria where it phosphorylates ubiquitin to regulate mitophagy39. Thus, inter-organelle communication influences cargoe selection for autophagy. In contrast to the Keap1, Cul3 and Nrf2 pathway that modulates autophagy and antioxidant stress response32,36, the Keap1 and Cul3 E3 complex facilitates ER-phagy and inhibits mitophagy during developmental organelle clearance in the fly intestine. PINK1 functions upstream of Keap1, and PINK1 and Keap1 have similar influence on Rtnl1 and Atl ER-phagy receptors. Both PINK1 and Keap1 are required for ubiquitylation of Rtnl1. In addition, Keap1 is enriched near mitochondria in PINK1 mutant cells. Therefore, PINK1 influences distinct E3 ubiquitin ligases to specify clearance of ER and mitochondria.
The roles of mitophagy receptor ubiquitylation are clear, but less is known about ubiquitin and ER-phagy receptors. Two recent studies indicate that ubiquitin plays an important role in ER-phagy40,41. Our data indicate that phospho-ubiquitin partly localized with Rtnl1 in Parkin mutant compared to control cells. Since Parkin mutant cells possess increased ER clearance, these data suggest that phospho-ubiquitin association with Rtnl1 contributes to ER-phagy. ER-phagy receptors are resident ER proteins that bind to Atg8/LC3, and influence ER shape42,43. Multiple ER-phagy receptors are required for ER clearance. Interestingly, Rtnl1 and Atl mutant intestine cells manifest different ER morphologies. In addition, PINK1 and Keap1 mutant cells possess the same decrease in Rtnl1 and increase in Atl, while Atl mutant cells fail to clear Rtnl1. These data suggest that ubiquitylation of receptors influences their levels, and this could influence ER shape needed for ER-phagy.
In summary, ER is selectively degraded during developmental autophagy. This physiological model reveals that clearance of ER and mitochondria requires common autophagy machinery, as well as organelle-specific receptors within a single cell. Significantly, PINK1 is required for clearance of both ER and mitochondria. By contrast, Keap1 and Parkin possess opposing roles in the clearance of ER and mitochondria downstream of PINK1. These studies reveal that much remains to be learned about how a cell determines how much and which autophagic substrates are cleared, and the impact of these selective autophagy programs on health and disease.
Limitations of the study
Further investigations are needed to understand if PINK1, Keap1 and Cul3 regulate ER-phagy in other cell contexts, including human cells. It is also important to discover other cell contexts where ER-phagy is a normal physiological response. Mechanistic issues need to be resolved, including how PINK1 kinase function regulates Keap1 and Cul3 ubiquitylation of Rtnl1. Finally, it is critical to resolve the relationships between the ER-phagy receptors, and determine how their ubiquitylation influences ER shape and ER-phagy.
STAR★METHODS
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact: Eric H. Baehrecke (eric.baehrecke@umassmed.edu).
Materials availability
Plasmids, Drosophila lines and datasets generated in this study are available on request from the lead contact.
Data and code availability
Microscopy data and original western blot images reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request.
No original code was used in this study.
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND STUDY PARTICIPANT DETAILS
Drosophila melanogaster strains used in this study are listed in the KEY RESOURCES TABLE. All Drosophila genotypes are provided (Table S1). The animals used in this study were of both genders unless noted for specific mutant genotypes. Animals were analyzed as either feeding third instar larvae or 2 hours after puparium formation as noted. We did not observe any influence of gender on results. Flies were reared at 25 °C on standard cornmeal/molasses/agar media.
REAGENTS or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER | |
---|---|---|---|
Antibodies | |||
Ref(2)p/p62 | Abcam | ab178440 | |
Atg8a | Cell Signaling | 13733 | |
ATP5a | Abcam | Ab14748 | |
Calnexin | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank | Cnx99A 6-2-1 | |
GFP | Abcam | ab150169 | |
GFP | Roche | 11814460001 | |
V5 | Invitrogen | R960–25 | |
V5 | Cell signaling | 13202 | |
FLAG | Cell signaling | 14793 | |
Calnexin | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank | Cnx99A 6-2-1 | |
Phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, E2J6T) | Cell Signaling | 62802 | |
Phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, E5T1W) | Cell Signaling | 70973 | |
Ubiquitin (P4D1) | Cell Signaling | 3936 | |
Conjugated ubiquitin (UBCJ2) | Enzo Life Science | ENZ-ABS840–0100 | |
autoimmune double stranded DNA | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank | autoanti-dsDNA | |
Actin | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank | JLA20 | |
Anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 | Invitrogen | A-11029 | |
Anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 | Invitrogen | A-27034 | |
Anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 546 | Invitrogen | A-11035 | |
Anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 546 | Invitrogen | A-11030 | |
Anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 647 | Invitrogen | A-S28181 | |
Anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 647 | Invitrogen | A-27040 | |
Anti-chicken Alexa Fluor 488 | Abcam | ab150169 | |
Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Secondary Antibody, HRP | Invitrogen | 31460 | |
Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Secondary Antibody, HRP | Invitrogen | 31430 | |
MBP Monoclonal Antibody (HRP conjugated) | NEB | E8038 | |
MBP magnetic beads | NEB | E8037S | |
Glutathione Magnetic Agarose Beads | Thermo Scientific | 78602 | |
ChromoTek V5-Trap Agarose | Proteintech | V5ta-20 | |
Bacterial and virus strains | |||
BL21 Competent E. coli | NEB | C2530H | |
Chemicals, peptides and recombinant proteins | |||
Glutathione (reduced) | Thermo Scientific | 78259 | |
D-(+)-Maltose monohydrate | SUPELCO | 47288 | |
Normal goat serum | Life technologies | PCN5000 | |
PBS | GIBCO | 70011 | |
Hoechst | Invitrogen | 33342 | |
Vectashield | Vector Laboratories | H-1200 | |
LysoTracker Deep Red | Invitrogen | L12492 | |
Halt™ Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Single-Use Cocktail, EDTA-Free (100X) | Thermo Scientific | 78445 | |
PMSF | Roche | 10837091001 | |
Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains | |||
PINK1-GFP | Hong Xu | N/A | |
Rtnl1–3×Flag-V5 | This study | N/A | |
Atl-3×Flag-V5 | This study | N/A | |
Keap1–3×Flag-V5 | This study | N/A | |
UAS-Bip-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 | This study | N/A | |
Atg9 D51 | Guangchao Chen | N/A | |
Vps34 m22 | Thomas Neufeld | N/A | |
Atl 2 | James McNew | N/A | |
Rtnl1 1W | James McNew | N/A | |
Park 25 | Leo Pallanck | N/A | |
PINK1 B9 | Jongkyeong Chung | N/A | |
PINK1 5 | Ming Guo | N/A | |
Atg16 Δ | Eric Baehrecke | N/A | |
Atg8 Δ | This study | N/A | |
Park Δ | This study | N/A | |
BNIP3 Δ | This study | N/A | |
Keap1 036 | Dirk Bohmann | N/A | |
ARE-GFP | Dirk Bohmann | N/A | |
Cnc 1223 | Fengwei Yu | N/A | |
Cul3GFT2, FRT40A | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | 23866 | |
vasa-Cas9 | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | 56552 | |
vasa-Cas9 | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | 51324 | |
UAS-Cas9 | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | 67078 | |
UAS-mitoGFP | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | 8442 | |
UAS-mitoGFP | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | 8443 | |
Vps13D MI11101 | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 56282 | |
Df(3L)BSC631 | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 25722 | |
Park (TKO.GS00852) | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 77064 | |
Atg1 RNAi | Vienna Drosophila Resource Center | 16133 | |
Atg9 RNAi | Vienna Drosophila Resource Center | 10045 | |
PINK1 RNAi | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 38262 | |
PINK1 RNAi | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 55886 | |
Vps13D RNAi | Vienna Drosophila RNAi Cente | 41792 | |
Luciferase RNAi | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 31603 | |
BNIP3 (WKO.3-C11) | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 82537 | |
Keap1 RNAi | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 40932 | |
His2Av-mRFP, FRT2A | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 34498 | |
HsFlp, Ubi-nlsRFP, FRT19A | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 31416 | |
HsFlp, His2Av-GFP, FRT19A | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 32045 | |
hsFlp(D5) | Bloomington Drosophila stock center | 55814 | |
hsFlp; FRT42D,Ubi-nlsRFP | Eric Baehrecke | N/A | |
hsFlp; Ubi-nlsRFP, FRT40A | Eric Baehrecke | N/A | |
hsFlp;;FRT82B, Ubi-nlsRFP | Eric Baehrecke | N/A | |
hsFlp;;His2Av-mRFP, FRT2A | This study | N/A | |
hsFlp;;Sec61a-GFP, Act(CD2)Gal4, UAS-dsRed | This study | N/A | |
hsFlp; UAS-Cas9; Sec61a-GFP, Act(CD2)Gal4, UAS-dsRed | This study | N/A | |
hsFlp; FRT42D | This study | N/A | |
hsFlp;;FRT82B | This study | N/A | |
hsFlp;;FRT2A | This study | N/A | |
FRT19A;hsFlp | This study | N/A | |
Tub-Gal4 | Eric Baehrecke | N/A | |
NP1-Gal4 | Eric Baehrecke | N/A | |
Sec61α-GFP | Vienna Drosophila RNAi Cente (VDRC) | 318343 | |
Trp1K13305, FRT40A | Kyoto Drosophila Genetic Resource Center | 114350 | |
Recombinant DNA | |||
U6droBsagRNA | Drosophila Genomics Resources Center | 1341 | |
pCFD3.1-w-dU6:3gRNA | Addgene | 123366 | |
pUASTattB | Drosophila Genomics Resources Center | 1419 | |
pCR™ 2.1-TOPO™ TA vector | Invitrogen | 450641 | |
Oligonucleotides (See Table S2 for a list of oligonucleotides) | |||
Software and Algorithms | |||
Image J | NIH | https://imagej.nih.govij/ | |
Image Studio Lite Ver 5.2 | LI-COR | https://www.licor.com/bio/image-studio-lite/ | |
Prism | Graphpad Software | https://www.graphpac.com/scientific-software/prism/ | |
ZEN | Zeiss | https://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/us/prodats/microscopesoftware/;en.html | |
NIS-Elements | Nikon | https://www.microscope.healthcare.nikon.com/products/software/nis-elements |
METHOD DETAILS
Fly stocks
Flies were reared at 25 °C on standard cornmeal-molasses-agar media. PINK1-GFP was a gift from Hong Xu29. Atg9D51 was a gift from G. Chen44. Vps34m22 was a gift from Thomas Neufeld45. Alt2 46 and Rtnl11W 47 were gifts from James McNew. Park25 48 were gifts from Leo Pallanck. PINK1B9 was a gift from Jongkyeong Chung30. PINK15 was a gift from Ming Guo31. Keap1036 was a gift from Dirk Bohmann36. Cnc1223 was a gift from Fengwei Yu49.
To generate UAS-ss-Rtnl1-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5, the coding region flanked by 15 bp homologous arms (Table S2) was synthesized by IDT (San Diego, California) and assembled into a pUAST-attB vector using the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Takara, 639650). Plasmid DNA was injected by Bestgene (Chino Hills, California) into a strain carrying either attP40 or attP2 landing sites, and integrated into either the second or the third chromosome of the Drosophila genome using phiC31 integrase.
The Atg8a loss-of-function mutant Atg8aΔ strain was created using the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing50. sgRNA targeting sequences are provided (Table S2). A 0.8 kb gblock flanking the region of deletion was synthesized by IDT (San Diego, California) and inserted into a TOPO vector (Invitrogen, 450641). gRNAs and donors were co-injected into vasa-Cas9 transgenic flies with different chromosome of Cas9 insertion against target gene localized chromosome. Germline injection was done by Bestgene (Chino Hills, California). Progeny were collected and screened for Atg8a deletion by DNA sequencing.
The Parkin loss-of-function ParkΔ FRT2A strain was created by crossing vas-Cas9; FRT2A with Park gRNA transgenic flies (gRNA sequence provided in Table S2). The BNIP3 loss-of-function BNIP3Δ strain was generated by crossing vas-Cas9 with BNIP3 dual-gRNA transgenic flies (gRNA sequence provided in (Table S2). Progeny were collected and screened for deletion by DNA sequencing (sequencing primers provided in Table S2).
Gene editing to tag Rtnl1, Atl and Keap1
Rtnl1, Atl and Keap1 encoded proteins were tagged on their C-termini with 3×Flag-V5 separated by a 15 amino acids poly-glycine peptide linker (GGGGSGLRSSRGPFE) by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. gRNAs were designed by https://flycrispr.org/ and https://www.flyrnai.org/crispr3/web/ with low off-target score and high frame shift score and selected against off-targeting on the gene located chromosome. We used two gRNAs flanking the Rtnl1 stop codon, one gRNA proximal to the Atl stop codon and two gRNAs flanking the Keap1 stop codon for gene editing. gRNA oligonucleotides were synthesized by IDT and subcloned into pCFD2-dU6:3 gRNA (Addgene). Related guide RNA sequences are provided in Table S2. We designed 600–800 bp homologous arms for each gene and all PAM sequences were silent mutations unless the PAM was located in the intron or 3’-UTR regions. Homologous directed repair donor templates were synthesized by IDT and subcloned into TOPO vectors (Invitrogen). gBlock sequences are provided in Table S2. gRNAs and donors were co-injected into vasa-Cas9 transgenic flies with a different chromosome of Cas9 insertion against target gene located chromosome. Germline injection was conducted by Bestgene (Chino Hills, California). Progeny were collected and screened for precise insertions by DNA sequencing.
Induction of mosaic RNAi/mutant cell clones and whole intestine RNAi expression
Mosaic dsRed positive RNAi- and transgene-expressing cell clones and fluorescent-negative cell clones were induced as described23. To induce RNAi-expressing cell clones in the intestine, virgin female hsFlp;; Sec61α-GFP, Act>CD2>GAL4, UAS-dsRed were crossed with RNAi line males. One-day-old eggs were heat shocked at 37 °C for 5 minutes. To induce BNIP3wko CRISPR mutant cell clones the midgut, virgin female hsFlp; UAS-Cas9; Sec61α-GFP, Act>CD2>GAL4, UAS-dsRed were crossed with male BNIP3wko. One-day-old eggs were heat shocked at 37 °C for 15 minutes. To induce loss-of-function cell clones, 0–4 hour-old embryos were heat shocked at 37 °C for 1 hour. Myo31DFNP0001 (NP1-GAL4) was used to drive RNAi expression in the whole intestine.
Protein expression and purification
The coding regions of Drosophila Atl, Rtnl1, Trp1 and Atg8a cDNAs from clones GH09383, LD14068, RE23984 and LD05816 (Drosophila Genomics Resource Center, Bloomington, IN, USA) were amplified using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB, M0492S) with primers in Table S2, and subcloned into pMAL-c5X (NEB N8108S) MBP and pGEX-6P-2 GST (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) expression vectors. Mutations in putative LC3/GABARAP/Atg8a interacting regions (LIR) of Atl (EAGRA), Trp1 (AAVWA, DAEIA, EALDA) that were predicted by software (https://ilir.warwick.ac.uk/search.php) were mutated with primers in Table S2 using Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (NEB, E0554S) so that two essential amino acids were replaced by alanine. MBP alone, MBP-Atl and LIR mutant ATL, MBP-Rtnl1, MBP-Trp1 and LIR mutant Trp1, and GST-Atg8a were expressed in E. coli BL21, immobilized with either MBP magnetic beads (NEB, E8037S) or Glutathione magnetic beads in binding (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % β-ME, protease inhibitor cocktail) and wash buffer (1% Triton-X100, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % β-ME, protease inhibitor cocktail). MBP tagged proteins were eluted in maltose elution buffer (10 mM maltose, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5), and GST-Atg8a was eluted in glutathione elution buffer (10 mM glutathione, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5).
Atg8a binding assay
20 μg of GST-Atg8a protein was immobilized onto glutathione magnetic beads in Atg8a binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % β-ME, protease inhibitor cocktail) for 30 minutes at 4 °C. Atg8a binding beads were then incubated with 20 μg MBP-Rtnl1, MBP-Atl, MBP-Trp1 and relatives containing putative LIR mutant proteins for 2 hours at 4 °C. The beads were washed 6 times with wash buffer (1% Triton-X100, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % β-ME, protease inhibitor cocktail) and resuspended in 2xLaemli sample buffer. The samples were separated using 4%−20% SDS-PAGE, transferred, and antibody against MBP (HRP conjugated, 1:20000, NEB, E8038) was used to detect MBP-fusion proteins. Atg8a was detected using antibody against GABARAP (1:1000, Cell signaling, 13733).
Immunolabeling and microscopy
Intestines were dissected from staged animals in PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS 0.3% Triton X-100 (PBST), and blocked with goat serum for 2 hours before incubating with primary antibodies in 0.3% PBST with 5% goat serum. We used mouse anti-Calnexin (1:100), rabbit anti-Ref(2)p/p62 (1:200), mouse anti-ATP5A (1:200), mouse anti-dsDNA (1:40), rabbit anti-phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, 1:200, E5T1W), mouse anti-ubiquitin (1:200, P4D1), mouse anti-conjugated ubiquitin (1:200, UBCJ2), mouse anti-GFP (1:200), mouse anti-V5 (1:200), rabbit anti-V5 (1:200), and rabbit anti-FLAG (1:200) for immunostaining. All secondary antibodies (1:200) were incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. Hoechst 33342 dye was used to stain DNA. Tissues were mounted in VectaShield.
Samples were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope equipped with a Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.40 Oil DIC M27 objective using Zeiss Zen Software and a Nikon A1R HD25 confocal microscope equipped with a CFI Plan Apochromat 60x/1.4 Oil DIC objective NIS-Elements Viewer software. Images collected with the Nikon confocal microscope were further magnified by 2.88. Images were deconvoluted using NIS-Elements C software and processed with Fiji51.
LysoTracker staining
Fly intestines expressing the Rtnl1-pHluorin-mKate2 sensor were dissected 2 hours after pupariation in PBS, and incubated with LysoTracker Deep Red (1:300, Invitrogen, L12492) and Hoechst 33342 DNA stain (1:100) in PBS at room temperature for 10–15 minutes. Intestines were mounted in VectaShield and immediately imaged by confocal microscopy.
Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation
Intestines from 20 staged Drosophila were dissected 2 hours after puparium formation in prechilled PBS for each genotype, including those expressing RNAis and UAS-ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 driven by NP1-GAL4, homozygous mutants, and respective controls, and homogenized in 2xSDS sample buffer (2% SDS, 63 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail and 1 mM PMSF. 20 μg of protein measured by BCA protein assay from each genotype lysate was mixed with LDS sample buffer analyzed by western and immunoblotted with mouse anti-Calnexin (1:1000), rabbit anti-Ref(2)p (1:1000), rabbit anti-phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, 1:1000, E2J6T), mouse anti-ubiquitin (1:1000, P4D1), mouse anti-V5 (1:2000), mouse anti-GFP (1:2000) and mouse anti-Actin (1:1000) antibodies.
For immunoprecipitation experiments, intestines from 70–90 staged Drosophila were dissected 2 hours APF in prechilled PBS for each genotype. A subgroup of 20–30 intestines of each genotype were ground in 40 μl prechilled freshly made co-immunoprecipitation (COIP) buffer (1% Triton X-100, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 142.5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2,1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail and 1 mM PMSF. All subgroup lysates of each genotype were placed on ice until dissection was completed, and then merged and supplemented with COIP buffer to 500 μl for an extra 1 hour of incubation at 4 °C with rotation. 15–20 μl of total lysates (input) were collected and mixed with LDS sample buffer followed by boiling. 600–700 mg proteins of each genotype as determined by BCA protein assay were incubated with 20 μl of V5-Trap agarose beads supplemented with COIP buffer to 1 ml at 4 °C overnight with rotation. Agarose beads were washed 5 times with COIP buffer for 20 minutes at 4 °C with rotation and eluted with LDS sample buffer followed by boiling. Both input lysates and immunoprecipitated lysates were analyzed by western and immunoblotted with mouse anti-ubiquitin (P4D1, 1:1000), mouse anti-V5 (1:1000), rabbit anti-V5 (1:1000) and mouse anti-Actin (1:1000) antibodies.
Transmission electron microscopy
As previously described23, intestines were dissected in PBS 2 hours after pupariation, fixed over night at 4°C in a solution of 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, osmicated, and washed in distilled water. Preparations were stained en bloc in 1% aqueous uranyl acetate and dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, treated with propylene oxide and infiltrated in SIP-pon/Araldite for embedding. Ultrathin sections of the anterior region of the midgut were collected and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. For each genotype, at least 3 intestines were embedded and sectioned for analyses and quantification. Imaging was performed using a Phillips CM10 TEM.
QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Fiji51 was used to quantify immunofluorescence intensity and puncta in images. Fiji and Image Studio Lite were used to quantify protein levels in western blot analyses. p-values were calculated using either a two-tailed unpaired t-test, Kruskal-Wallis H test or One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey’s post-hoc test or Fisher’s LSD test from Graphpad Prism 5 (https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/). The number (n) of samples analyzed by immunostaining represents number of enterocytes cells from at least 4 independent animals from each genotype. No animals were excluded from statistical analyses, the experiments were not randomized, and the investigators were not blinded. All error bars are SEM.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) clearance by autophagy occurs during development
ER clearance requires PINK1 kinase
The ubiquitin E3 ligase Parkin is required for clearance of mitochondria but not ER
Keap1 is required for ubiquitylation of Rtnl1 and clearance of ER
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank F. Yu, G. Chen, H. Xu, J.A. McNew, L.J. Pallanck, Vienna Drosophila Resource Center, Bloomington Drosophila stock center, and Kyoto Drosophila Genetic Resource Center for flies, the Electron Microscopy Core Facility at UMass Chan Medical School, and I. Dikic, F. Kraus and J.W. Harper for advice. This work was supported by R35GM131689 to E.H.B and F30CA239374 to J.L.S..
Footnotes
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS:
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hubner CA, and Dikic I (2020). ER-phagy and human diseases. Cell Death Differ 27, 833–842. 10.1038/s41418-019-0444-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pickles S, Vigie P, and Youle RJ (2018). Mitophagy and Quality Control Mechanisms in Mitochondrial Maintenance. Curr Biol 28, R170–R185. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jin SM, Lazarou M, Wang C, Kane LA, Narendra DP, and Youle RJ (2010). Mitochondrial membrane potential regulates PINK1 import and proteolytic destabilization by PARL. J Cell Biol 191, 933–942. 10.1083/jcb.201008084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim Y, Park J, Kim S, Song S, Kwon SK, Lee SH, Kitada T, Kim JM, and Chung J (2008). PINK1 controls mitochondrial localization of Parkin through direct phosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 377, 975–980. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shiba-Fukushima K, Imai Y, Yoshida S, Ishihama Y, Kanao T, Sato S, and Hattori N (2012). PINK1-mediated phosphorylation of the Parkin ubiquitin-like domain primes mitochondrial translocation of Parkin and regulates mitophagy. Sci Rep 2, 1002. 10.1038/srep01002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ordureau A, Sarraf SA, Duda DM, Heo JM, Jedrychowski MP, Sviderskiy VO, Olszewski JL, Koerber JT, Xie T, Beausoleil SA, et al. (2014). Quantitative proteomics reveal a feedforward mechanism for mitochondrial PARKIN translocation and ubiquitin chain synthesis. Mol Cell 56, 360–375. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Koyano F, Okatsu K, Kosako H, Tamura Y, Go E, Kimura M, Kimura Y, Tsuchiya H, Yoshihara H, Hirokawa T, et al. (2014). Ubiquitin is phosphorylated by PINK1 to activate parkin. Nature 510, 162–166. 10.1038/nature13392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wauer T, Simicek M, Schubert A, and Komander D (2015). Mechanism of phosphoubiquitin-induced PARKIN activation. Nature 524, 370–374. 10.1038/nature14879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kane LA, Lazarou M, Fogel AI, Li Y, Yamano K, Sarraf SA, Banerjee S, and Youle RJ (2014). PINK1 phosphorylates ubiquitin to activate Parkin E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. J Cell Biol 205, 143–153. 10.1083/jcb.201402104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lazarou M, Sliter DA, Kane LA, Sarraf SA, Wang C, Burman JL, Sideris DP, Fogel AI, and Youle RJ (2015). The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy. Nature 524, 309–314. 10.1038/nature14893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abudu YP, Shrestha BK, Zhang W, Palara A, Brenne HB, Larsen KB, Wolfson DL, Dumitriu G, Oie CI, Ahluwalia BS, et al. (2021). SAMM50 acts with p62 in piecemeal basal- and OXPHOS-induced mitophagy of SAM and MICOS components. J Cell Biol 220. 10.1083/jcb.202009092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khaminets A, Heinrich T, Mari M, Grumati P, Huebner AK, Akutsu M, Liebmann L, Stolz A, Nietzsche S, Koch N, et al. (2015). Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum turnover by selective autophagy. Nature 522, 354–358. 10.1038/nature14498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mochida K, Oikawa Y, Kimura Y, Kirisako H, Hirano H, Ohsumi Y, and Nakatogawa H (2015). Receptor-mediated selective autophagy degrades the endoplasmic reticulum and the nucleus. Nature 522, 359–362. 10.1038/nature14506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fumagalli F, Noack J, Bergmann TJ, Cebollero E, Pisoni GB, Fasana E, Fregno I, Galli C, Loi M, Solda T, et al. (2016). Translocon component Sec62 acts in endoplasmic reticulum turnover during stress recovery. Nat Cell Biol 18, 1173–1184. 10.1038/ncb3423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Grumati P, Morozzi G, Holper S, Mari M, Harwardt MI, Yan R, Muller S, Reggiori F, Heilemann M, and Dikic I (2017). Full length RTN3 regulates turnover of tubular endoplasmic reticulum via selective autophagy. Elife 6. 10.7554/eLife.25555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chino H, Hatta T, Natsume T, and Mizushima N (2019). Intrinsically Disordered Protein TEX264 Mediates ER-phagy. Mol Cell 74, 909–921 e906. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen Q, Xiao Y, Chai P, Zheng P, Teng J, and Chen J (2019). ATL3 Is a Tubular ER-Phagy Receptor for GABARAP-Mediated Selective Autophagy. Curr Biol 29, 846–855 e846. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liang JR, Lingeman E, Ahmed S, and Corn JE (2018). Atlastins remodel the endoplasmic reticulum for selective autophagy. J Cell Biol 217, 3354–3367. 10.1083/jcb.201804185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nthiga TM, Kumar Shrestha B, Sjottem E, Bruun JA, Bowitz Larsen K, Bhujabal Z, Lamark T, and Johansen T (2020). CALCOCO1 acts with VAMP-associated proteins to mediate ER-phagy. EMBO J 39, e103649. 10.15252/embj.2019103649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chang TK, Shravage BV, Hayes SD, Powers CM, Simin RT, Wade Harper J, and Baehrecke EH (2013). Uba1 functions in Atg7- and Atg3-independent autophagy. Nat Cell Biol 15, 1067–1078. 10.1038/ncb2804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shen JL, Fortier TM, Wang R, and Baehrecke EH (2021). Vps13D functions in a Pink1-dependent and Parkin-independent mitophagy pathway. J Cell Biol 220. 10.1083/jcb.202104073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hu Y, Flockhart I, Vinayagam A, Bergwitz C, Berger B, Perrimon N, and Mohr SE (2011). An integrative approach to ortholog prediction for disease-focused and other functional studies. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 357. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Anding AL, Wang C, Chang TK, Sliter DA, Powers CM, Hofmann K, Youle RJ, and Baehrecke EH (2018). Vps13D Encodes a Ubiquitin-Binding Protein that Is Required for the Regulation of Mitochondrial Size and Clearance. Curr Biol 28, 287295.e286. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shen JL, Fortier TM, Zhao YG, Wang R, Burmeister M, and Baehrecke EH (2021). Vmp1, Vps13D, and Marf/Mfn2 function in a conserved pathway to regulate mitochondria and ER contact in development and disease. Curr Biol. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang R, Miao G, Shen JL, Fortier TM, and Baehrecke EH (2022). ESCRT dysfunction compromises endoplasmic reticulum maturation and autophagosome biogenesis in Drosophila. Curr Biol 32, 1262–1274 e1264. 10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Novak I, Kirkin V, McEwan DG, Zhang J, Wild P, Rozenknop A, Rogov V, Lohr F, Popovic D, Occhipinti A, et al. (2010). Nix is a selective autophagy receptor for mitochondrial clearance. EMBO Rep 11, 45–51. 10.1038/embor.2009.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ordureau A, Kraus F, Zhang J, An H, Park S, Ahfeldt T, Paulo JA, and Harper JW (2021). Temporal proteomics during neurogenesis reveals large-scale proteome and organelle remodeling via selective autophagy. Mol Cell 81, 5082–5098 e5011. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang T, Xue L, Li L, Tang C, Wan Z, Wang R, Tan J, Tan Y, Han H, Tian R, et al. (2016). BNIP3 Protein Suppresses PINK1 Kinase Proteolytic Cleavage to Promote Mitophagy. Journal of Biological Chemistry 291, 21616–21629. 10.1074/jbc.M116.733410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang Y, Wang ZH, Liu Y, Chen Y, Sun N, Gucek M, Zhang F, and Xu H (2019). PINK1 Inhibits Local Protein Synthesis to Limit Transmission of Deleterious Mitochondrial DNA Mutations. Mol Cell 73, 1127–1137 e1125. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Park J, Lee SB, Lee S, Kim Y, Song S, Kim S, Bae E, Kim J, Shong M, Kim JM, and Chung J (2006). Mitochondrial dysfunction in Drosophila PINK1 mutants is complemented by parkin. Nature 441, 1157–1161. 10.1038/nature04788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Clark IE, Dodson MW, Jiang C, Cao JH, Huh JR, Seol JH, Yoo SJ, Hay BA, and Guo M (2006). Drosophila pink1 is required for mitochondrial function and interacts genetically with parkin. Nature 441, 1162–1166. 10.1038/nature04779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Komatsu M, Kurokawa H, Waguri S, Taguchi K, Kobayashi A, Ichimura Y, Sou YS, Ueno I, Sakamoto A, Tong KI, et al. (2010). The selective autophagy substrate p62 activates the stress responsive transcription factor Nrf2 through inactivation of Keap1. Nat Cell Biol 12, 213–223. 10.1038/ncb2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Taguchi K, Fujikawa N, Komatsu M, Ishii T, Unno M, Akaike T, Motohashi H, and Yamamoto M (2012). Keap1 degradation by autophagy for the maintenance of redox homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 13561–13566. 10.1073/pnas.1121572109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kobayashi A, Kang MI, Okawa H, Ohtsuji M, Zenke Y, Chiba T, Igarashi K, and Yamamoto M (2004). Oxidative stress sensor Keap1 functions as an adaptor for Cul3based E3 ligase to regulate proteasomal degradation of Nrf2. Mol Cell Biol 24, 71307139. 10.1128/MCB.24.16.7130-7139.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang DD, Lo SC, Cross JV, Templeton DJ, and Hannink M (2004). Keap1 is a redox-regulated substrate adaptor protein for a Cul3-dependent ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol Cell Biol 24, 10941–10953. 10.1128/MCB.24.24.10941-10953.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sykiotis GP, and Bohmann D (2008). Keap1/Nrf2 signaling regulates oxidative stress tolerance and lifespan in Drosophila. Dev Cell 14, 76–85. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tooze SA, and Yoshimori T (2010). The origin of the autophagosomal membrane. Nat Cell Biol 12, 831–835. 10.1038/ncb0910-831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Phillips MJ, and Voeltz GK (2016). Structure and function of ER membrane contact sites with other organelles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17, 69–82. 10.1038/nrm.2015.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pickrell AM, and Youle RJ (2015). The roles of PINK1, parkin, and mitochondrial fidelity in Parkinson’s disease. Neuron 85, 257–273. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gonzalez A, Covarrubias-Pinto A, Bhaskara RM, Glogger M, Kuncha SK, Xavier A, Seemann E, Misra M, Hoffmann ME, Brauning B, et al. (2023). Ubiquitination regulates ER-phagy and remodelling of endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 618, 394–401. 10.1038/s41586-023-06089-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Foronda H, Fu Y, Covarrubias-Pinto A, Bocker HT, Gonzalez A, Seemann E, Franzka P, Bock A, Bhaskara RM, Liebmann L, et al. (2023). Heteromeric clusters of ubiquitinated ER-shaping proteins drive ER-phagy. Nature 618, 402–410. 10.1038/s41586-023-06090-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shibata Y, Hu J, Kozlov MM, and Rapoport TA (2009). Mechanisms shaping the membranes of cellular organelles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 25, 329–354. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gubas A, and Dikic I (2022). ER remodeling via ER-phagy. Mol Cell 82, 1492–1500. 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wen JK, Wang YT, Chan CC, Hsieh CW, Liao HM, Hung CC, and Chen GC (2017). Atg9 antagonizes TOR signaling to regulate intestinal cell growth and epithelial homeostasis in Drosophila. Elife 6. 10.7554/eLife.29338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Juhasz G, Hill JH, Yan Y, Sass M, Baehrecke EH, Backer JM, and Neufeld TP (2008). The class III PI(3)K Vps34 promotes autophagy and endocytosis but not TOR signaling in Drosophila. J Cell Biol 181, 655–666. 10.1083/jcb.200712051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lee M, Paik SK, Lee MJ, Kim YJ, Kim S, Nahm M, Oh SJ, Kim HM, Yim J, Lee CJ, et al. (2009). Drosophila Atlastin regulates the stability of muscle microtubules and is required for synapse development. Dev Biol 330, 250–262. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wakefield S, and Tear G (2006). The Drosophila reticulon, Rtnl-1, has multiple differentially expressed isoforms that are associated with a sub-compartment of the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell Mol Life Sci 63, 2027–2038. 10.1007/s00018-006-6142-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Greene JC, Whitworth AJ, Kuo I, Andrews LA, Feany MB, and Pallanck LJ (2003). Mitochondrial pathology and apoptotic muscle degeneration in Drosophila parkin mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 4078–4083. 10.1073/pnas.0737556100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chew LY, Zhang H, He J, and Yu F (2021). The Nrf2-Keap1 pathway is activated by steroid hormone signaling to govern neuronal remodeling. Cell Rep 36, 109466. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gratz SJ, Ukken FP, Rubinstein CD, Thiede G, Donohue LK, Cummings AM, and O’Connor-Giles KM (2014). Highly specific and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-catalyzed homology-directed repair in Drosophila. Genetics 196, 961–971. 10.1534/genetics.113.160713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9, 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Microscopy data and original western blot images reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request.
No original code was used in this study.
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.