Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 14.
Published in final edited form as: Cell. 2023 Aug 25;186(19):4172–4188.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.008

PINK1, Keap1 and Rtnl1 regulate selective clearance of endoplasmic reticulum during development

Ruoxi Wang 1, Tina M Fortier 1, Fei Chai 1, Guangyan Miao 1, James L Shen 1, Lucas J Restrepo 1, Jeromy J DiGiacomo 1, Panagiotis D Velentzas 1, Eric H Baehrecke 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC10530463  NIHMSID: NIHMS1924183  PMID: 37633267

SUMMARY

Selective clearance of organelles, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria, by autophagy plays an important role in cell health. Here we describe a developmentally programmed selective ER clearance by autophagy. We show that Parkinson’s disease associated PINK1, as well as Atl, Rtnl1 and Trp1 receptors, regulate ER clearance by autophagy. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin functions downstream of PINK1 and is required for mitochondrial clearance while having the opposite function in ER clearance. By contrast, Keap1 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cullin3 function downstream of PINK1 to regulate ER clearance by influencing Rtnl1 and Atl. PINK1 regulates a change in Keap1 localization and Keap1-dependent ubiquitylation of the ER-phagy receptor Rtnl1 to facilitate ER clearance. Thus, PINK1 regulates the selective clearance of ER and mitochondria by influencing the balance of Keap1- and Parkin-dependent ubiquitylation of substrates that determine which organelle is removed by autophagy.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1924183-f0001.jpg

In Brief

Investigation into the clearance of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) during fly intestine development unveils a crosstalk between mitophagy and ER-phagy, and provides mechanistic insights into autophagy-mediated cross-organelle remodeling that is important for cell- and organism- health.

INTRODUCTION

Macroautophagy (autophagy) is a catabolic process that facilitates the degradation of either bulk non-specific cytoplasmic components or specific cytoplasmic cargoes, including mitochondria and ER, by delivery to lysosomes. The selective removal of each type of organelle by autophagy depends on specific initiation signals and receptors1,2. For example, the clearance of mitochondria by autophagy (mitophagy) is triggered when stimuli induce stabilization of the PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) on the surface of mitochondria3. PINK1 then phosphorylates ubiquitin and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin on mitochondria4,5, thus marking mitochondria and associated proteins with ubiquitin to target them for degradation by autophagy69.

The recruitment of mitochondria into forming autophagosomes depends on receptors that bind to both ubiquitin and the core autophagy protein LC3/GABARAP (Atg8 in lower organisms)10,11. Similarly, selective clearance of ER by autophagy (ER-phagy) requires receptors for recruitment of ER into forming autophagosomes1219. Importantly, the signal and receptor codes that mediate and distinguish selective mitophagy from ER-phagy are thought to be unique for mitochondria and ER.

The mechanisms that distinguish mitophagy and ER-phagy within a single cell has been challenging. This is because of limitations in the availability of physiological models to study the clearance of specific organelles within a single cell. In addition, the mechanisms that control organelle-specific autophagy is largely based on the use of chemicals that stress either mitochondria or ER in cultured cells. It remains unclear if different autophagy cargoes are cleared by distinct programs within the same cell, and how organelle-specific genetic regulatory programs influence one another.

Here we show that mitochondria and ER are differentially cleared by autophagy in a single cell during development in the Drosophila intestine. Although mitochondria and ER require common autophagy genes for clearance, each organelle utilizes specific receptors for removal. Mitochondrial PINK1 is required for ER-phagy even though it is thought to specifically influence mitophagy. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin that functions downstream of PINK1 in mitophagy has the opposite function in ER-phagy. By contrast, the Keap1 and Cullin3 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex is required for ER-phagy downstream of PINK1. PINK1 influences the localization of Keap1, and PINK1 and Keap1 are required for ubiquitylation of the ER-phagy receptor Rtnl1. Our data indicates that PINK1 regulates the clearance of ER and mitochondria, and organelle-specificity is achieved through the functions of either Keap1 or Parkin.

RESULTS

ER clearance is regulated by autophagy during development

A rise in steroid triggers the development from a larva to prepupa in Drosophila, and induces autophagy in enterocyte cells of the intestine anterior midgut20. This autophagy is specific to enterocytes, and is required for cell size reduction. Mitochondria are removed in an autophagy (Atg) gene-dependent manner from enterocytes20,21. However, it is unclear if ER is cleared by autophagy from enterocytes. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses of control enterocytes 2 hours after puparium formation (APF) revealed autophagosomes that contain rough ER (Figure 1A). By contrast, Atg8aΔ mutant intestine enterocytes exhibit decreased autophagosome structures and possess numerous dilated ER structures (Figure 1B and 1C, Figure S1AS1B). The presence of dilated ER in Atg8a mutant cells is consistent with the ER morphology observed in ER-phagy receptor deficient mammalian cells12.

Figure 1. Autophagy regulates ER clearance during development.

Figure 1.

(A and B) TEM images of homozygous Atg8aΔ mutant enterocytes exhibit decreased ER in autophagic structures, and reveal increased dilated ER surrounded by ribosomes compared to control (Atg8aΔ/+) cells. Blue masks label ER-autophagosomes. Magenta masks label dilated ER.

(C) Quantification of average ER-autophagosomes per μm2 (ERap/μm2) in Atg8a mutant compared to control cells. n = 32 (Ctrl), n = 32 (Atg8aΔ) images from at least 3 animals were quantified.

(D and D’) Atg9D51 mutant enterocytes (lacking RFP, white dotted line) exhibit increased Sec61α (green) compared to control cells (red).

(E) Quantification of Sec61α mean intensity (mean intst) in Atg9 mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 6 (Ctrl) cells and n = 6 (Atg9D51) cells were measured.

(F and F’) Atg16Δ mutant enterocytes (lacking RFP, white dotted line) possess increased Sec61α (green) compared to control cells (red).

(G) Quantification of Sec61α mean intensity (mean intst) in Atg16 mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 5 (Ctrl), n = 6 (Atg16Δ) cells were measured.

(H) Calnexin and Ref(2)p levels in Atg1 RNAi knockdown (Atg1 IR) intestines, Atg9 RNAi knockdown (Atg9 IR) intestines, and control intestines analyzed by western blot.

(I) Quantification of the ratio (fold) of Calnexin (CANX)/Actin normalized to control. n = 3 independent experiments.

(J) Calnexin and Ref(2)p levels in homozygous Atg16Δ mutant and control intestines analyzed by western blot.

(K) Quantification of the ratio (fold) of Calnexin (CANX)/Actin normalized to control. n = 3 independent experiments.

(L) Diagram of ER-phagy sensor.

(M) Schematic of ER-phagy detection using the ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 sensor.

(N) Atg9D51 mutant enterocytes (white dotted line) that express ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 (ss-PK-KDEL) in all cells exhibit increased cell size and decreased ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta (red puncta, mK2) co-localization with lysotracker (gray) compared to control cells (smaller cells).

(O) Quantification of ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localized with lysotracker in Atg9 mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 7 (Ctrl), n = 7 (Atg9D51), cells were measured.

All animals were staged 2 hours APF. Scale bars in (A) and (B) represent 0.5 μm and scale bars in (A’) and (B’) represent 0.25 μm. Scale bars in (D), (F), and (N) represent 20 μm and scale bar in inset (N) represent 5 μm. Insets in (N) are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle = Atg9 mutant cell, yellow rectangle = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *. p<0.05, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001 from One-way ANOVA corrected by Tukey’s post-hoc test and unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments. See also Figure S1.

To investigate whether ER degradation requires autophagy in Drosophila intestine cells, we examined ER-localized Sec61α-GFP reporter clearance in autophagy mutant enterocytes 2 hours APF. Cells lacking the function of either Atg9, Atg16, or Vps34 exhibit increased levels of Sec61α-GFP compared to neighboring control cells (Figure 1D1G, Figure S1CS1D). Consistent with loss of autophagy, Atg9d51, Atg16Δ and Vps34m22mutant intestine cells possessed increased levels of the autophagy receptor and substrate Ref(2)p (p62 in mammals), and elevated levels of the ER-localized Calnexin protein compared to neighboring control cells (Figure S1ES1J). Similarly, Calnexin protein levels increased in Atg1 and Atg9 knockdown intestines compared to control intestines expressing Luciferase RNAi (Figure 1H and 1I). Additionally, homozygous Atg16 Δ mutant intestines possess 55% more Calnexin protein compared to control w1118 intestines (Figure 1J and 1K).

We constructed an ER-phagy sensor to investigate the dynamics of ER autophagic flux. Tandem fluorochromes, including modified pH sensitive pHluorin and pH resistant mKate2, were fused in between the ER-targeting sequence of Bip and a KDEL-ER retention signal, and placed under control of a UAS promoter (UAS-ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5, Figure 1L) to measure ER-phagy in the intestine. Both green and red fluorochromes of the sensor exhibit ER-like structures in third instar larval intestine cells before the initiation of autophagy (Figure S1K)20. Additionally, ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 levels in Atg16Δ mutant larval intestines are similar to control intestines (Figure S1LS1M). After activation of autophagy, the ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-containing ER fragments are delivered to autophagosomes followed by fusion with lysosomes, causing a lack of green fluorescence due to the acidic nature of autolysosomes (Figure 1M). Consistent with the requirement for autophagy in ER clearance, ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 reporter levels are elevated in Atg16Δ mutant enterocytes compared to control intestine cells 2 hours APF (Figure S1LS1M). Importantly, the smaller control intestine enterocytes (Figure 1N, yellow rectangles in lower magnification images and upper panels in insets) exhibit increased ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localization with lysotracker-stained lysosomes and contain less ss-pHluorin-KDEL (Figure 1N and 1O). By contrast, either Atg9d51 or Atg16Δ mutant enterocytes are larger in size, contain more ss-pHluorin-KDEL and possess decreased ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localization with lysotracker compared to control cells 2 hours APF (Figure 1N and 1O, Figure S1NS1O).

Selective clearance of organelles requires both common genes and distinct receptors

To investigate whether ER clearance in the Drosophila intestine is selective, we queried the Drosophila melanogaster genome for ER-phagy receptors using an orthologue prediction tool22. Orthologues of the mammalian ER-phagy receptors ATL3, RTN3 and Sec62 are conserved and encoded by Atl, Rtnl1 and Trp1 (Figure S2A). By contrast, ER-phagy receptors FAM134B, CCPG1, TEX264 and CALCOCO1 do not possess clear fly orthologues. Significantly, Atl2, Rtnl11W and Trp1KG mutant intestine cells possess increased Sec61α-GFP ER reporter levels compared to control cells (Figure 2A2F). In addition, Atl, Rtnl1 and Trp1 proteins interact with Atg8a in vitro (Figure 2G). Consistent with roles as ER-phagy receptors, Atl and Trp1 interact with Atg8a through putative LC3-interacting region (LIR) motifs (Figure S2BS2G).

Figure 2. Atg8a binding and ER-localized proteins regulate ER clearance.

Figure 2.

(A and A’) Atl2 mutant intestine enterocytes (lacking RFP) exhibit increased Sec61α (green) compared to control cells (red).

(B) Quantification of Sec61α mean intensity (mean intst) in Atl mutant compared to control cells. n = 4 (Ctrl) cells and n = 4 (Atl2) cells were measured.

(C and C’) Rtnl11w mutant intestine enterocytes (lacking RFP) possess increased Sec61α (green) compared to control cells (red).

(D) Quantification of Sec61α mean intensity (mean intst) in Atl mutant compared to control cells. n = 6 (Ctrl) cells and n = 6 (Rtnl11W) cells were measured.

(E and E’) Trp1KG mutant enterocytes (lacking RFP) exhibit increased Sec61α-GFP (green) compared to control cells (red).

(F) Quantification of Sec61α mean intensity (mean intst) in Trp1 mutant compared to control cells. n = 7 (Ctrl) cells and n = 4 cells (Trp1KG) were measured.

(G) Physical interactions between MBP, MBP-Atl, MBP-Rtnl1 and MBP-Trp1 with GST-Atg8a.

(H and H’) Enterocytes expressing Rtnl1–3×Flag-V5 possess increased Rtnl1 (red, detected by anti-V5 antibody) and Ref(2)p puncta (green) in Atg8aΔ mutant compared to control cells.

Ref(2)p puncta were used to label Atg8aΔ mutant cells.

(I) Quantification of Rtnl1 intensity in Atg8aΔ mutant compared to control cells. n = 12 (Ctrl), n = 13 (Atg8aΔ) cells were measured.

(J and J’) Enterocytes expressing Rtnl1–3×Flag-V5 possess increased Rtnl1 (red, detected by anti-V5 antibody) and Ref(2)p puncta (green) in Atg16Δ mutant compared to control cells.

Ref(2)p puncta were used to label Atg16Δ mutant cells.

(K) Quantification of Rtnl1 intensity in Atg16Δ mutant compared to control cells. n = 8 (Ctrl), n = 9 (Atg16Δ) cells were quantified.

(L and L’) Enterocytes expressing Atl-3×Flag-V5 possess increased Atl (red, detected by anti-V5 antibody) and Ref(2)p puncta (green) in Atg9D51 mutant compared to control cells. Ref(2)p puncta were used to label Atg9D51 mutant cells.

(M) Quantification of Atl intensity in Atg9D51 mutant compared to control cells. n = 8 (Ctrl), n = 8 (Atg9D51) cells were quantified.

(N and N’) Enterocytes expressing Atl-3×Flag-V5 possess increased Atl (red, detected by anti-V5 antibody) and Ref(2)p puncta (green) in Atg8aΔ mutant compared to control cells. Ref(2)p puncta were used to label Atg8aΔ mutant cells.

(O) Quantification of Atl intensity in Atg8aΔ mutant compared to control cells. n = 8 (Ctrl), n = 10 (Atg8aΔ) cells were quantified

(P-R) TEM images reveal distinct ER structures in homozygous Atl2 and Rtnl11w mutant and control intestine cells. Blue arrowheads indicate ER in autophagic structures. Yellow arrowheads indicate ER structures. Magenta masks in the insets label rough ER structures.

(S) Quantification of 3–5 rough ER area per image in Atl and Rtnl1 mutant compared to control cells. n = 132 (Ctrl), n = 39 (Atl2), n = 67 (Rtnl11W) ER structures from 60 (Ctrl), 45 (Atl2), 51 (Rtnl11W) images measured.

All animals were staged 2 hours APF. Mutant cells are indicated with white dotted lines. Scale bars in (A), (C), (E), (H), (J), (L) and (N) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in (P) to (R) lower magnification represent 0.5 μm, and scales bars in insets represent 0.25 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001 from unpaired, two-tailed t-test and One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey’s post-hoc test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments. See also Figure S2.

We investigated whether Rtnl1 and Atl proteins are influenced by autophagy. Antibodies do not exist against Drosophila ER-phagy receptors. Thus, we used CRISPR-Cas9 to tag the C-termini of both Rtnl1 and Atl with 3×Flag-V5 (Figure S2HS2I) to enable detection of all isoforms of these ER-phagy receptors. Loss of either Atg8a or Atg16 resulted in failure to clear Rtnl1 compared to control enterocytes 2 hours APF (Figure 2H2K). Similarly, enterocyte cell loss of either Atg9 or Atg8a resulted in failure to clear Atl compared to control cells 2 hours APF (Figure 2L2O). Interestingly, loss of Atl mutant intestine cells exhibit an increase in Rtnl1 and Calnexin (Figure S2JS2K). Furthermore, TEM analyses of either Atl2 or Rtnl11W mutant intestine enterocytes revealed increased amounts of interconnected and elongated rough ER structures in the cytoplasm that are similar to the influence of RTN3 on ER morphology in mammals15, while control cells possessed rough ER in autophagic structures (Figure 2P2S).

The selective recruitment of autophagic cargoes is thought to be defined by specific receptor combinations1,2, but no studies have tested this model in a single cell in an animal. Since both mitochondria and ER clearance occur in the same intestine cell context during developmental autophagy20,21 (Figure 1), we compared the specificities of autophagy receptors in selective mitophagy and ER-phagy. Vps13D has characteristics of an autophagy receptor23, is required for clearance of mitochondria21,23, influences mitochondria ER contact24, and ER morphology25. Consistent with previous work21,23, Vps13DMI mutant intestine cells exhibit increased mitochondrial Mito-GFP puncta compared to control enterocytes (Figure 3A, 3A”, and 3B). Significantly, the ER protein Calnexin is elevated in the same Vps13DMI loss-of-function intestine cells compared to neighboring control cells (Figure 3A’, 3A”, and 3C), thus Vps13D is required for both mitophagy and ER-phagy in the same cell. Vps13D knockdown cells also exhibit increased Sec61α-GFP compared to control cells (Figure S3AS3B). In addition, TEM analyses of Vps13D mutant intestine cells accumulate dilated ER compared to control enterocytes (Figure S3CS3D). These data indicate that ER-phagy and mitophagy share common regulators.

Figure 3. Selective organelle clearance requires both common regulators and distinct autophagy receptors for each organelle.

Figure 3.

(A-A”) Vps13DMI mutant cells exhibit increased Mito-GFP (A, green), Calnexin (A’, red, CANX) and Ref(2)p (magenta, inset in A”) compared to control cells.

Quantification of average Mito-GFP puncta per μm2 in Vps13D mutant compared to respective control cells. n = 7 (Ctrl), n = 8 (Vps13DMI) cells were measured.

Quantification of Calnexin mean intensity (mean intst) in Vps13D mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 10 (Ctrl), n = 10 (Vps13DMI) cells were measured.

(D-G) Atg16Δ, Rtnl11w, Trp1KG and Atl2 mutant enterocytes (lacking RFP) exhibit either elevated Mito-GFP (green) puncta (Atg16Δ) or comparable Mito-GFP puncta (Rtnl11w, Trp1KG and Atl) compared to control cells (red).

(H) Quantification of Mito-GFP puncta in Atg16, Rtnl1, Trp1 and Atl mutant compared to respective control cells. n = 19 (Ctrl), n = 10 (Atg16Δ), n = 11 (Rtnl11w), n = 7 (Trp1KG), n = 13 (Atl2) cells were measured.

(I-I”) Intestine cells expressing Cas9 and dsRed (red) in BNIP3 dual-gRNA (BNIP3WKO) transgenic flies that express Sec61a-GFP in all cells exhibit increased levels of ATP5A puncta (I, magenta) and decreased intensity of Sec61a-GFP (I’, green) compared to control cells.

(J) Quantification of average ATP5A puncta per μm2 in BNIP3 mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 7 (Ctrl), n = 7 (BNIP3WKO) cells were measured.

(K) Quantification of Sec61α mean intensity (mean intst) in BNIP3 mutant compared to control cells. n = 7 (Ctrl), n = 8 (BNIP3WKO) cells were measured.

All animals were staged 2 hours APF. Mutant cells are indicated with white dotted lines. Scale bars in (A”), (D-G), (I) and scale bar in inset (A”) and (I”) represent 20 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s. = not significant, *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, ****, p<0.0001 from unpaired, twotailed t-test and One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments. See also Figure S3.

We investigated the functions of the Rtnl1, Trp1 and Atl ER-phagy receptors in selective ER-phagy and mitophagy. Core autophagy Atg16-deficient intestine enterocytes fail to clear mitochondrial-localized Mito-GFP puncta (Figure 3D and 3H), similar to how Atg16 loss prevents ER clearance (Figure 1). By contrast, loss of either Rtnl11W, Trp1KG or Atl2 in mutant intestine enterocytes fails to impact Mito-GFP puncta clearance and have similar levels to their respective neighboring control cells (Figure 3E3H). Therefore, core regulators of autophagy impact both mitochondria and ER clearance, while the Rtnl1, Trp1 and Atl receptors are specific to ER-phagy.

We next examined if the mammalian mitophagy receptor BNIP326 is conserved in Drosophila and functions to specifically regulate the clearance of mitochondria. BNIP3 is conserved in Drosophila, including two amino acids in the LIR motif that are required for BNIP3 to function as a mitophagy receptor (Figure S3ES3F). Consistent with the function of BNIP3 in mammals2628, fly BNIP3 gRNAs/Cas9-expressing enterocytes possess increased mitochondrial ATP5A compared to control enterocytes (Figure 3I, 3I”, and 3J). In contrast to the impact of BNIP3 on mitochondrial clearance, ER Sec61α-GFP levels are decreased in BNIP3 mutant compared to control intestine cells (Figure 3I’3I” and 3K). In addition, ER-phagy flux is increased in BNIP3 mutant enterocytes compared to control intestine cells (Figure S3HS3J). These results indicate that BNIP3 is required for mitophagy in the same cells where Rtnl1, Trp1 and Atl are specifically required for ER-phagy.

Developmentally programmed ER clearance requires PINK1

PINK1 appears to function upstream of Vps13D in the regulation of mitophagy in intestine enterocytes21. Since Vps13D influences the clearance of both mitochondria and ER, we tested the influence of PINK1 on ER-phagy. Surprisingly, PINK1B9 mutant intestine enterocytes exhibit increased Sec61α-GFP and Calnexin compared to neighboring control cells (Figure 4A and 4D, Figure S4AS4B). Similarly, PINK1 knockdown intestine cells expressing PINK1 RNAis exhibit elevated Sec61α-GFP compared to control cells (Figure S4CS4F). In addition, Atg8aΔ loss-off-unction mutant intestine cells exhibit increased Sec61α-GFP compared to neighboring control enterocytes, and Atg8aΔ PINK1B9 double-mutant cells exhibit similar Sec61α-GFP levels as PINK1B9 and Atg8aΔ single-mutant intestine cells (Figure 4B4D), indicating that PINK1 and Atg8a function in the same ER-phagy pathway. Consistent with a role in ER-phagy, PINK1B9 and PINK15 mutant intestine cells that express the ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 ER-phagy sensor exhibit decreased ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localization with lysotracker compared to control intestines (Figure S4GS4J).

Figure 4. PINK1 regulates developmentally programmed ER clearance.

Figure 4.

(A to C) PINK1B9 single mutant (A), Atg8aΔ single mutant (B), and PINK1B9 and Atg8aΔ double (C, PINK1B9, Atg8aΔ) mutant intestine cells (lacking RFP, white dotted line) exhibit increased Sec61α (green) compared to respective control cells (red). PINK1B9 and Atg8aΔ (C) double mutant cells possess comparable Sec61α-GFP intensity to either PINK1B9 or Atg8aΔ single mutant icells 2 hours APF.

(D) Quantification of relative Sec61α-GFP intensity in PINK1 single, Atg8a single, and PINK1 Atg8a double mutant cells normalized to Sec61α-GFP intensity in respective control cells. n = 14 (Ctrl), n = 14 (PINK1B9), and n = 7 (PINK1B9, Atg8aΔ) cells were measured.

(E) Western blot analysis of phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, p-Ubi), pan-ubiquitin (P4D1), Ref(2)p, Atg8a and Actin in feeding third larval instar (Larva3rd) w1118, w1118 (Ctrl2 hr APF), Atg8aΔ single mutant (2 hr APF), PINK1B9 single mutant (2 hr APF), and PINK1B9 Atg8aΔ double mutant (2 hr APF) intestines.

(F) Quantification of the ratio of phospho-ubiquitin (S65)/pan-ubiquitin (P4D1) normalized to larva. n = 3 independent experiments.

(G) Quantification of the ratio of Ref(2)p/actin normalized to larva. n = 3 independent experiments.

(H) Intestines from animals containing Rtnl1–3×Flag-V5 possess decreased Rtnl1 (red, detected by anti-V5 antibody) in PINK1B9 mutant (white dotted line, non-green nuclei) compared to control cells 2 hours APF.

(I) Quantification of Rtnl1 intensity in PINK1B9 mutant compared to control cells. n = 6 (Ctrl), n = 6 (PINK1B9) cells were measured.

(J) Intestines from animals containing Atl-3×Flag-V5 possess increased Atl (red, detected by anti-V5 antibody) in PINK1B9 mutant (white dotted line, non-green nuclei) compared to control cells 2 hours APF.

(K) Quantification of Atl intensity in PINK1B9 mutant compared to control cells. n = 10 (Ctrl), n = 10 (PINK1B9) cells were measured.

(L) Rtnl1 and Atl levels in male homozygous PINK1B9 mutant and control intestines 2 hours APF analyzed by western blot. Rtnl1 and Atl were detected by anti-V5 antibody.

(M) Quantification of 28 kDa Rtnl1 in PINK1B9 mutant normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

(N) Quantification of 41 kDa Rtnl1 in PINK1B9 mutant normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

(O) Quantification of high molecular weight (>100kDa, HW) Rtnl1 in PINK1B9 mutant normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

(P) Quantification of Atl in PINK1B9 mutant normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

Scales bars in (A to C, H and J) represent 20 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s. = not significant, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001 from One-Way ANOVA Fisher’s LSD test and unpaired, two tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments. See also Figure S4.

PINK1 is localized to and activated on mitochondria to regulate phosphorylation of ubiquitin (serine 65) and ubiquitination of multiple mitochondria-associated proteins7,9,10. Since PINK1 regulates clearance of both mitochondria and ER during development, we investigated if PINK1 expression and kinase activity changes in association with autophagy during development. To measure PINK1 levels in flies, we utilized a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged PINK1 that was created by making an in-frame fusion of GFP to the C-terminus of PINK1 (PINK1-GFP) by gene editing29. Interestingly, PINK1-GFP is increased 2 hours APF in both male and female intestines compared to respective staged larval controls (Figure S4KS4L). However, we did not observe significant co-localization of PINK1-GFP with the ER-phagy receptor Rtnl1 (Figure S4MS4N). Consistent with increased PINK1 levels at the stage when autophagy is induced, phosphorylation of the PINK1 substrate, ubiquitin serine 65, is increased after pupariation compared to larval intestines (Figure 4E and 4F). Furthermore, Atg8aΔ mutant intestines exhibit elevated levels of phosphorylated ubiquitin compared to control intestines after pupariation (Figure 4E and 4F), suggesting that PINK1 is activated during development and autophagy influences phospho-ubiquitin levels. Importantly, PINK1B9 single mutant and PINK1B9Atg8aΔ double mutant intestines lack phosphorylated ubiquitin (Figure 4E and 4F). In addition, PINK1B9 single mutant intestines possess similar levels of Ref(2)p compared to control intestines after pupariation, and PINK1B9Atg8aΔ double mutant intestines possess similar Ref(2)p levels compared to Atg8aΔ single mutant intestines (Figure 4E and 4G).

To investigate if PINK1 regulates ER-phagy through receptors, we tested if Rtnl1 and Atl are altered by PINK1 loss in enterocytes. Interestingly, PINK1B9 mutant cells possess decreased Rtnl1–3×Flag-V5 levels (Figure 4H and 4I), and increased Atl-3×Flag-V5 levels (Figure 4J and 4K) compared to neighboring control enterocytes 2 hours APF. Consistent with these data, 28 kDa and 41 kDa Rtnl1 protein levels are decreased in homozygous PINK1 mutant compared to control intestines 2 hours APF (Figure 4L4N). A long exposure revealed a high molecular weight Rtnl1 protein smear that was decreased in PINK1 mutant compared to control intestines (Figure 4L and 4O). In contrast to the decrease in Rtnl1 proteins, Atl is increased in PINK1 mutant compared to control intestines 2 hours APF (Figure 4L and 4P). These data indicate that PINK1 influences ER-phagy receptor levels.

Parkin has an opposite function from PINK1 in ER clearance

The E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin is activated by PINK1 to facilitate ubiquitylation of proteins associated with mitochondria during mitophagy2. Parkin also functions downstream of PINK1 in Drosophila30,31. Since the levels of both PINK1 and phosphorylation of its substrate ubiquitin are elevated during autophagy in the intestine (Figure 4), we tested if Parkin has a similar function to PINK1 in ER-phagy. ParkΔ mutant (Figure S5A) intestine enterocytes possess elevated markers of mitochondria, including ATP5A and Mito-GFP, compared to control cells (Figure S5BS5G). Surprisingly, ParkΔ mutant intestine enterocytes exhibit decreased Calnexin intensity and elevated levels of phospho-ubiquitin in the cytoplasm compared to control enterocytes (Figure 5A and 5B, Figure S5DS5G). Interestingly, ParkΔ mutant enterocytes exhibit elevated levels of PINK1 puncta, and more PINK1 puncta co-localize with mitochondria compared to neighboring control cells (Figure S5H and S5I). ParkΔ mutant intestine cells also possess similar levels of pan-ubiquitin that localize with mitochondria compared to neighboring control cells (Figure S5JS5K).

Figure 5. Parkin facilitates mitophagy and inhibits ER-phagy.

Figure 5.

(A) ParkΔ mutant cells (white dotted line) exhibit decreased calnexin (green), increased phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, red, p-Ubi) compared to control cells. p-Ubi was used to locate ParkΔ mutant cells.

(B) Quantification of calnexin mean intensity (mean intst) in ParkΔ mutant compared to control cells. n = 8 (Ctrl), n = 8 (ParkΔ) cells were measured.

(C) Intestines from animals that contain Rtnl1–3×Flag-V5 possess decreased Rtnl1 intensity (magenta, detected by anti-V5 antibody) with increased fragmented Rtnl1 puncta that partially co-localize with phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, green, p-Ubi) in ParkΔ mutant (white dotted line, non-red nuclei) compared to control cells.

(D) Quantification of co-localized Rtnl1 puncta with phosphorylated-ubiquitin puncta in Park mutant compared to control cells. n = 11 (Ctrl), n = 11 (ParkΔ) cells were quantified.

(E-F) Park25 mutant enterocytes (F) that contain Rtnl1–3xFlag-V5 (detected by anti-V5 antibody, red) exhibit increased Atg8a (green) puncta and increased co-localization of Atg8a with Rtnl1 puncta compared to control enterocytes (E).

(G) Quantification of the ratio of co-localized Atg8a-Rtnl1 puncta of total Atg8a puncta (%) in Park mutant compared to control intestine cells. n = 17 (Ctrl), n = 14 (Park25) cells were analyzed.

(H) Western blot analysis of phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, p-Ubi), pan-ubiquitin (P4D1), and Actin in Park25 mutant and control (Ctrl) intestines.

(I) Quantification of the ratio of phospho-ubiquitin (S65)/pan-ubiquitin (P4D1) in Park mutant normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

(J) Quantification of the ratio of pan-ubiquitin/Actin in Park mutant normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

(K) Rtnl1 and Atl levels in homozygous Park25 mutant and control intestines analyzed by western blot. Rtnl1 and Atl were detected by anti-V5 antibody.

(L) Quantification of 28 kDa Rtnl1 in Park25 mutant intestines normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

(M) Quantification of 41 kDa Rtnl1 in Park25 mutant intestines normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

(N) Quantification of high molecular weight (>100kDa, HW) Rtnl1 in Park25 mutant intestines normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

(O) Quantification of Atl in Park25 mutant intestines normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

(P-R) TEM images reveal that control w1118 intestines possess autophagosomes containing both ER and mitochondria (P), male homozygous PINK1B9 mutant intestines exhibit decreased autophagosomes/autolysosomes that contain ER (Q), and homozygous Park25 loss-of-function mutant intestines exhibit comparable autophagosomes containing ER structures (R) compared to control intestines. Blue arrowheads in (P) and (R) indicate ER in autophagic structures. Yellow arrowhead in (Q) indicates ER structures.

(S) Quantification of ER-containing autophagosomes (AP) and autolysosomes (ALY) in each image. n = 6 (Ctrl), n = 8 (PINK1B9), n = 7 (Park25) images were quantified.

All animals were staged 2 hours APF. Scale bars in (A”), (C), (E) and (F) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in (C), (E) and (F) insets represent 5 μm. Scale bars in (P), (Q) and (R) represent 0.2 μm, and scale bars in the inset represent 0.1 μm. Insets in (C), (E) and (F) are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle = Park mutant cell, yellow rectangle = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s. = not significant, *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001 from One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test and unpaired, two-tailed ttest. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments. See also Figure S5.

Our data indicate that Parkin has the opposite phenotype of PINK1 in the regulation of ER clearance by autophagy in the intestine. Therefore, investigated how Parkin influences the Rtnl1 and Atl ER-phagy receptors. Rtnl1 was localized in more distinct puncta in Parkin mutant enterocytes than control cells, and elevated levels of phosphorylated ubiquitin partly co-localize with Rtnl1 in Parkin mutant compared to neighboring control enterocytes (Figure 5C5D). In addition, Rtnl1 co-localization with Atg8a was increased in Parkin mutant compared to control intestines at 2 hours APF (Figure 5E5G). By contrast, Atl appeared similar between Parkin mutant and control cells, and also had elevated phosphorylated ubiquitin with increased co-localization with Atl (Figure S5LS5M). Similarly, Park25 mutant intestines possess elevated levels of phosphorylated ubiquitin, and similar levels of pan-ubiquitin (Figure 5H5J). Western blot analysis of ER-phagy receptors revealed that homozygous Parkin mutant intestines possess elevated Rtnl1 protein levels while Atl protein levels did not change (Figure 5K5O). Thus, Parkin and PINK1 mutant intestines possess opposite influences on ER-phagy receptor levels.

We next investigated the influence of PINK1 and Parkin on the content of autophagosomes by TEM. TEM analyses revealed that PINK1B9 mutant intestine cells exhibit decreased ER-containing autophagosomes and autolysosomes compared to control intestine cells that possess autophagosomes that contain both ER and mitochondria (Figure 5P, 5Q, and 5S). In contrast to PINK1B9 mutant enterocytes, Park25 mutant intestine cells possess autophagosomes that contain ER, and are similar to control intestine cells (Figure 5Q5S). These data reveal that in addition to their previously described functions in mitophagy, PINK1 and Parkin have opposing functions in ER clearance.

PINK1 and Keap1 function in a pathway to regulate ubiquitylation of Rtnl1 and ER-phagy

The distinct ER-phagy phenotypes of PINK1 and Parkin mutant intestine cells prompted us to consider if a different E3 ubiquitin ligase may be required for ER clearance. Kelch-like-ECH-associated-protein 1 (KEAP1) is part of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex with Cullin3 (Cul3) that is associated with autophagy and the autophagy receptor p62/Ref(2)p32,33. Therefore, we tested if Keap1 is required for ER clearance. Keap1036 mutant intestine enterocytes fail to clear ER, and possess increased Sec61α-GFP intensity and puncta that partially co-localized with Ref(2)p puncta compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF (Figure 6A and 6B). Since Keap1 is an adaptor in the Cul3 E3-ubiquitin ligase complex, we tested if Cul3 is required for ER clearance. Similar to Keap1 mutant cells, Cul3Δ mutant enterocytes possess increased Sec61α-GFP compared to control cells 2 hours APF (Figure 6C and 6D).

Figure 6. Keap1 facilitates ER-phagy and inhibits mitophagy.

Figure 6.

(A) Keap1036 mutant intestine cells lacking RFP (red, white dotted line) exhibit increased Sec61α (green) and Sec61α puncta co-localization with Ref(2)p (magenta) puncta compared to the control cells. Control insets (yellow rectangle), and Keap1 mutant insets (white rectangle).

White arrowheads indicate co-localized Sec61α and Ref(2)p puncta.

(B) Quantification of Sec61α-GFP (Sec61α) mean intensity (Sec61α intst) in Keap1036 mutant compared to control cells. n = 9 (Ctrl), n = 9 (Keap1036) cells were measured.

(C) Animals that express Sec61α-GFP in all cells exhibit increased Sec61α-GFP (green) in Cul3Δ mutant enterocytes (white dotted line, non-red) compared to control cells.

(D) Quantification of Sec61α-GFP intensity in Cul3Δ mutant compared to control cells. n = 7 (Ctrl), n = 7 (Cul3Δ) cells were quantified.

(E-E”) Keap1036 mutant intestine cells exhibit increased calnexin (magenta, CANX) and increased Ref(2)p puncta (red), and decreased Mito-GFP (green, Mito) puncta. Ref(2)p was used to label the Keap1 mutant cells.

(F) Quantification of calnexin (CANX) mean intensity (CANX intst) in Keap1 mutant compared to control cells. n = 5 (Ctrl), n = 5 (Keap1036) cells were measured.

(G) Quantification of average Mito-GFP puncta (Mito) per nm2 (Avg Mito/nm2) in Keap1 mutant compared to control cells. n = 5 (Ctrl), n = 5 (Keap1036) cells were measured.

(H) Keap1036 mutant intestine cells possess decreased mitochondrial DNA (dsDNA, magenta) co-localization with Mito-GFP puncta (green), and increased phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, red, p-Ubi) co-localization with Mito-GFP puncta compared to control cells. Yellow arrowheads indicate co-localized dsDNA puncta and Mito-GFP puncta. White arrowheads indicate co-localized phospho-ubiquitin puncta and Mito-GFP puncta with lack of dsDNA.

(I) Quantification of average Mito-GFP co-localization with dsDNA puncta per nm2 (Avg Mito-dsDNA/nm2) in Keap1 mutant compared to control cells. n = 6 (Ctrl), n = 7 (Keap1036) cells were measured.

(J) Quantification co-localized phospho-ubiquitin puncta and Mito-GFP puncta ratio of total Mito-GFP puncta (pUbi-Mito/Mito%) in Keap1 mutant compared to control cells. n = 8 (Ctrl), n = 9 (Keap1) cells were measured.

(K) Intestines from animals containing Rtnl1–3×Flag-V5 possess decreased Rtnl1 (red, detected by anti-V5 antibody) in Keap1036 mutant (white dotted line) compared to control cells. Ref(2)p was used to label mutant cells.

(L) Quantification of Rtnl1 intensity in Keap1 mutant compared to control cells. n = 7 (Ctrl), n = 7(Keap1036) cells were measured.

(M) Intestines from animals containing Atl-3×Flag-V5 possess increased Atl (red, detected by anti-V5 antibody) in Keap1 RNAi knockdown enterocytes (white dotted line, non-green nuclei) compared to control cells.

(N) Quantification of Atl intensity in Keap1 RNAi cells compared to control cells. n = 6 (Ctrl), n = 6 (Keap1036) cells were measured

(O) Rtnl1 and Atl levels in Keap1 RNAi knockdown and control intestines analyzed by western blot. Rtnl1 and Atl were detected by anti-V5 antibody.

(P) Quantification of 28 kDa Rtnl1 in Keap1 RNAi intestines normalized to control intestines. n = 3 (Ctrl), n = 3 (Keap1036) independent experiments.

(Q) Quantification of 41 kDa Rtnl1 in Keap1 RNAi intestines normalized to control intestines. n = 3 (Ctrl), n = 3 (Keap1036) independent experiments.

(R) Quantification of high molecular weight (>100kDa, HW) Rtnl1 in Keap1 RNAi intestines normalized to control intestines. n = 3 (Ctrl), n = 3 (Keap1IR) independent experiments.

(S) Quantification of Atl in Keap1 RNAi intestines normalized to control intestines. n = 3 (Ctrl), n = 3 (Keap1IR) independent experiments.

All animals were staged 2 hours APF. Scale bars in (A and inset at the right corner), (C and inset), (E”), (H), (K and inset), (M and inset) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in (A, right panel), (H, right panel) insets represent 5 μm. Insets in (A) and (H) are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle = Keap1 mutant cell, yellow rectangle = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s. = not significant, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001, from One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test and unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments. See also Figure S6.

The Keap1 and Cul3 complex ubiquitylates Nrf2 (Cnc in flies) to target this transcriptional regulator of antioxidant stress response for degradation3436. Consistent with previous studies, the Cnc-regulated antioxidant response element (ARE)-GFP reporter is activated in Keap1036 mutant intestine enterocytes (Figure S6AS6B), suggesting that the Keap1-Cul3-Cnc signaling axis is conserved in enterocytes 2 hours APF. In contrast to Keap1 mutant enterocytes, cells lacking Cnc function fail to accumulate the autophagy receptor Ref(2)p (Figure S6CS6E). Importantly, Keap1 and Cnc double mutant cells fail to modify Calnexin levels compared to Keap1 single mutant enterocytes (Figure S6FS6H), suggesting that Keap1-Cul3 regulates ER clearance in a Cnc-independent manner in enterocytes.

We investigated the specificity of Keap1 in the regulation of ER-phagy. Consistent with a role in ER clearance, Keap1 mutant intestine enterocytes exhibit decreased ER-phagy flux as measured by the ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 sensor (Figure S6IS6J). In contrast to the increase in ER-associated Calnexin in Keap1 mutant enterocytes, Mito-GFP puncta are decreased in Keap1 mutant compared to neighboring control cells (Figure 6E6G). Importantly, Keap1 mutant cells exhibit increased conjugated ubiquitin puncta that co-localize with Ref(2)p puncta, but not with Mito-GFP puncta (Figure S6KS6L). These data indicate that Keap1 is required for ER clearance.

Since Keap1 mutant cells appear to possess fewer mitochondria than control cells, we investigated the impact of Keap1 on mitophagy. We analyzed phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) using an antibody against double strand DNA (dsDNA) in Keap1 mutant and control intestine cells. Interestingly, Keap1 mutant cells exhibit decreased mtDNA puncta (dsDNA) that are co-localized with Mito-GFP puncta compared to neighboring control cells (Figure 6H and 6I). Importantly, this decrease in mtDNA puncta in Keap1 mutant cells is suppressed by loss of Atg16 function (Figure S6MS6N). In addition, Keap1 mutant cells possess increased co-localization of phospho-ubiquitin puncta and Mito-GFP puncta compared to control cells (Figure 6H and 6J).

PINK1 and Keap1 mutant intestine cells possess similar defects in ER clearance. Therefore, we investigated the influence of Keap1 on ER-phagy receptors. Consistent with PINK1 mutants, Keap1 mutant enterocytes possess reduced Rtnl1 levels compared to control cells 2 hours APF (Figure 6K and 6L). In addition, Keap1 RNAi knockdown cells exhibit slightly increased Atl levels compared to neighboring control enterocytes (Figure 6M and 6N). Western blot analysis also revealed decreased Rtnl1 and increased Atl protein levels in intestines with reduced Keap1 function (Figure 6O6S).

We next examined the relationship between PINK1 and Keap1 by measuring ER-phagy flux using the ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 sensor in Keap1 knockdown and PINK1 mutant intestines. Either Keap1 knockdown or homozygous PINK1B9 mutant intestines exhibit a comparable decrease in ER-phagy flux (Figure 7A7C, and 7E). Significantly, intestines that express Keap1 RNAi in homozygous PINK1B9 mutant animals possess a similar decrease in ER-phagy flux compared to either Keap1 knockdown or PINK1 mutant intestines alone (Figure 7D and 7E). These data suggest that Keap1 and PINK1 are in the same pathway to regulate ER clearance.

Figure 7. PINK1 influences Keap1 localization, Rtnl1 ubiquitylation and ER clearance.

Figure 7.

(A-D) Male Keap1 knockdown (Keap1IR, B) intestines expressing Keap1 RNAi, male PINK1B9 loss-of-function intestines (C) and male PINK1B9 mutant intestines expressing Keap1 RNAi (PINK1B9, Keap1IR, D) that express ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 exhibit decreased red puncta co-localization with lysotracker (gray) compared to control Luciferase RNAi intestine cells (A). PINK1 and Keap1 double mutant intestines exhibit similar decrease in ER-phagy flux measured by the ER-phagy sensor compared to either of the PINK1 or Keap1 single mutant intestines. Insets are from yellow rectangles. White arrowheads indicate co-localized red puncta and lysotracker puncta. Yellow arrowheads indicate co-localized green and red puncta.

(E) Quantification of ratio of lysotracker co-localized red with ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta/total ssmKate2-KDEL puncta (mK2(lyso)/total%). n = 9 (Ctrl), n = 17 (Keap1IR), n = 8 (PINK1B9), n = 6 (PINK1B9, Keap1IR) cells were measured.

(F and F’) Intestines from animals that contain Keap1–3×Flag-V5 possess increased and large Keap1 puncta (green, detected by anti-V5 antibody) that co-localize with increased ATP5A puncta (magenta) in PINK1B9 mutant (white dotted line) compared to control cells.

(G) Quantification of Keap1 intensity in PINK1 mutant compared to neighboring control cells. n = 8 (Ctrl), n = 8 (PINK1B9) cells were measured.

(H and H’) Intestines from animals that contain Keap1–3×Flag-V5 exhibit similar Keap1 intensity (green, detected by anti-V5 antibody) and some co-localization with ATP5A puncta (magenta) in ParkΔ mutant enterocytes (white dotted line, non-red in nuclei) compared to control cells.

(I) Quantification of Keap1 intensity in Parkin mutant compared to control cells. n = 23 (Ctrl), n = 23 (ParkΔ) cells were analyzed.

(J) Keap1 levels in male homozygous PINK1B9, Park25 mutant and control intestines analyzed by western blot. Keap1 was detected by anti-V5 antibody.

(K) Quantification of Keap1 in PINK1 and Parkin mutant intestines normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

(L) Rtnl1 was immunoprecipitated from either control or PINK1B9 mutant intestines. Whole lysates (Input) and immunoprecipitated proteins (IP) were immunoblotted with anti-ubiquitin (P4D1), anti-V5, and anti-Actin antibodies.

(M) Quantification the ratio of ubiquitin (IP)/total Rtnl1-V5 (IP) in PINK1B9 mutant intestines normalized to control intestines. n = 3 independent experiments.

(N) Rtnl1 was immunoprecipitated from either control or Park25 mutant intestines. Whole lysates (Input) and immunoprecipitated proteins (IP) were immunoblotted with anti-ubiquitin (P4D1), anti-V5, and anti-Actin antibodies.

(O) Quantification of the ratio of ubiquitin (IP)/total Rtnl1-V5 (IP) in Park25 mutant normalized to control intestines. n = 3 (Ctrl), n = 3 (Park25) independent experiments.

(P) Rtnl1 was immunoprecipitated from either control or Keap1 RNAi intestines. Whole lysates (Input) and immunoprecipitated proteins (IP) were immunoblotted with anti-ubiquitin (P4D1), anti-V5, and anti-Actin antibodies.

(Q) Quantification of the ratio of ubiquitin (IP)/total Rtnl1-V5 (IP) in Keap1 knockdown intestines normalized to control intestines. n = 3 (Ctrl), n = 3 (Keap1IR) independent experiments.

All animals were staged 2 hours APF. Scale bars in (A-D), (F’) and (H’) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in (A-D), (F) and (H) insets represent 5 μm. Insets are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle in (F) and (H) = mutant cell, yellow rectangle in (F) and (H) = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s. = not significant, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001, from One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test, Kruskal-Wallis H test and unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments. See also Figure S7.

To investigate how PINK1 and Parkin influence Keap1, we created tagged Keap1–3×Flag-V5 Drosophila by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing (Figure S7A). In Atg9 mutant enterocytes, Keap1 levels are slightly increased and co-localize with mitochondrial ATP5A puncta (Figure S7BS7C). Interestingly, PINK1 mutant enterocytes possess enlarged Keap1 puncta that co-localize with mitochondrial ATP5A (Figure 7F and 7G). Although Parkin mutant enterocytes also possess elevated mitochondrial ATP5A, Keap1 levels are similar and mitochondria exhibit less co-localization with Keap1 compared to PINK1 mutant cells (Figure 7H and 7I). Furthermore, Parkin mutant cells possess increased co-localization of Keap1 with phosphorylated ubiquitin (Figure S7DS7E). Although Keap1 protein is present in both PINK1 and Parkin mutant intestines, Keap1 is elevated in PINK1 mutants compared to both control and Parkin mutant intestines (Figure 7J and 7K). These data indicate that PINK1 influences Keap1 mitochondrial localization, and that Parkin is not required for Keap1 proximity with mitochondria.

PINK1 and Keap1 mutant cells have similar defects in ER clearance, as well as similar influences on Rtnl1 and Atl ER-phagy receptor levels. Interestingly, Parkin mutants possess opposite phenotypes to both PINK1 and Keap1. Given the high molecular weight Rtnl1 protein smear that was changed in PINK1, Parkin and Keap1 deficient intestines (Figure 4L and 4O, Figure 5J and 5M, and Figure 6O and 6R), we examined if this may reflect ubiquitylation of Rtnl1. Intestines were dissected from staged animals, followed by immunoprecipitation of Rtnl1, and immunoblotting for ubiquitin. Loss of PINK1 results in decreased ubiquitylation of Rtnl1 (Figure 7L and 7M). By contrast, Parkin mutant intestines possess increased Rtnl1 ubiquitylation compared to control intestines (Figure 7N and 7O). Consistent with PINK1, Keap1 knockdown intestines possess decreased Rtnl1 ubiquitylation compared to control intestines (Figure 7P and 7Q). These data indicate that PINK1 and Keap1 are required for Rtnl1 ubiquitylation, and that Parkin negatively regulates Rtnl1 ubiquitylation. Together, our data indicate that PINK1 regulates the clearance of ER and mitochondria by autophagy, and that Keap1 is required for ER-phagy while Parkin regulates mitophagy.

DISCUSSION

The ER provides membranes to form different vesicles, including autophagosomes37. In addition, ER contacts multiple organelles38, raising complexity in understanding how organelle relationships influence cell quality control. Mitochondria and ER are selectively removed by utilizing distinct proteins during intestine development. Specifically, the mitophagy receptor BNIP3 regulates mitochondria clearance, and the ER-phagy receptors Trp1, Atl and Rtnl1 regulate ER clearance.

PINK1 is a mitochondrial protein that phosphorylates ubiquitin to promote the recruitment of mitophagy components to mitochondria, including Parkin2. Interestingly, our data indicates that PINK1 is required for ER clearance. In contrast to PINK1 mutant cells that fail to clear ER, Parkin mutant cells possess decreased ER, and increased phosphorylated ubiquitin. Parkin is known to facilitate ubiquitylation of mitochondrial proteins during mitophagy2. Thus, Parkin influences the localization of PINK1-dependent phosphorylated ubiquitin to influence selective organelle clearance.

Cells lacking the E3 ubiquitin ligase component Keap1 have the same defect in ER-phagy as PINK1 mutant cells. In contrast to Parkin mutant cells that fail to clear mitochondria and have decreased ER, Keap1 mutant intestine cells fail to clear ER and possess decreased mitochondria. These opposing phenotypes indicate that PINK1 functions in divergent pathways to clear ER and mitochondria, with Keap1 regulating ER-phagy and Parkin controlling mitophagy. PINK1 is localized to mitochondria where it phosphorylates ubiquitin to regulate mitophagy39. Thus, inter-organelle communication influences cargoe selection for autophagy. In contrast to the Keap1, Cul3 and Nrf2 pathway that modulates autophagy and antioxidant stress response32,36, the Keap1 and Cul3 E3 complex facilitates ER-phagy and inhibits mitophagy during developmental organelle clearance in the fly intestine. PINK1 functions upstream of Keap1, and PINK1 and Keap1 have similar influence on Rtnl1 and Atl ER-phagy receptors. Both PINK1 and Keap1 are required for ubiquitylation of Rtnl1. In addition, Keap1 is enriched near mitochondria in PINK1 mutant cells. Therefore, PINK1 influences distinct E3 ubiquitin ligases to specify clearance of ER and mitochondria.

The roles of mitophagy receptor ubiquitylation are clear, but less is known about ubiquitin and ER-phagy receptors. Two recent studies indicate that ubiquitin plays an important role in ER-phagy40,41. Our data indicate that phospho-ubiquitin partly localized with Rtnl1 in Parkin mutant compared to control cells. Since Parkin mutant cells possess increased ER clearance, these data suggest that phospho-ubiquitin association with Rtnl1 contributes to ER-phagy. ER-phagy receptors are resident ER proteins that bind to Atg8/LC3, and influence ER shape42,43. Multiple ER-phagy receptors are required for ER clearance. Interestingly, Rtnl1 and Atl mutant intestine cells manifest different ER morphologies. In addition, PINK1 and Keap1 mutant cells possess the same decrease in Rtnl1 and increase in Atl, while Atl mutant cells fail to clear Rtnl1. These data suggest that ubiquitylation of receptors influences their levels, and this could influence ER shape needed for ER-phagy.

In summary, ER is selectively degraded during developmental autophagy. This physiological model reveals that clearance of ER and mitochondria requires common autophagy machinery, as well as organelle-specific receptors within a single cell. Significantly, PINK1 is required for clearance of both ER and mitochondria. By contrast, Keap1 and Parkin possess opposing roles in the clearance of ER and mitochondria downstream of PINK1. These studies reveal that much remains to be learned about how a cell determines how much and which autophagic substrates are cleared, and the impact of these selective autophagy programs on health and disease.

Limitations of the study

Further investigations are needed to understand if PINK1, Keap1 and Cul3 regulate ER-phagy in other cell contexts, including human cells. It is also important to discover other cell contexts where ER-phagy is a normal physiological response. Mechanistic issues need to be resolved, including how PINK1 kinase function regulates Keap1 and Cul3 ubiquitylation of Rtnl1. Finally, it is critical to resolve the relationships between the ER-phagy receptors, and determine how their ubiquitylation influences ER shape and ER-phagy.

STAR★METHODS

RESOURCE AVAILABILITY

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact: Eric H. Baehrecke (eric.baehrecke@umassmed.edu).

Materials availability

Plasmids, Drosophila lines and datasets generated in this study are available on request from the lead contact.

Data and code availability

  • Microscopy data and original western blot images reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request.

  • No original code was used in this study.

  • Any additional information required to reanalyze the data in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND STUDY PARTICIPANT DETAILS

Drosophila melanogaster strains used in this study are listed in the KEY RESOURCES TABLE. All Drosophila genotypes are provided (Table S1). The animals used in this study were of both genders unless noted for specific mutant genotypes. Animals were analyzed as either feeding third instar larvae or 2 hours after puparium formation as noted. We did not observe any influence of gender on results. Flies were reared at 25 °C on standard cornmeal/molasses/agar media.

KEY RESOURCES TABLE

REAGENTS or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Antibodies
Ref(2)p/p62 Abcam ab178440
Atg8a Cell Signaling 13733
ATP5a Abcam Ab14748
Calnexin Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank Cnx99A 6-2-1
GFP Abcam ab150169
GFP Roche 11814460001
V5 Invitrogen R960–25
V5 Cell signaling 13202
FLAG Cell signaling 14793
Calnexin Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank Cnx99A 6-2-1
Phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, E2J6T) Cell Signaling 62802
Phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, E5T1W) Cell Signaling 70973
Ubiquitin (P4D1) Cell Signaling 3936
Conjugated ubiquitin (UBCJ2) Enzo Life Science ENZ-ABS840–0100
autoimmune double stranded DNA Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank autoanti-dsDNA
Actin Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank JLA20
Anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 Invitrogen A-11029
Anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 Invitrogen A-27034
Anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 546 Invitrogen A-11035
Anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 546 Invitrogen A-11030
Anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 647 Invitrogen A-S28181
Anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 647 Invitrogen A-27040
Anti-chicken Alexa Fluor 488 Abcam ab150169
Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Secondary Antibody, HRP Invitrogen 31460
Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Secondary Antibody, HRP Invitrogen 31430
MBP Monoclonal Antibody (HRP conjugated) NEB E8038
MBP magnetic beads NEB E8037S
Glutathione Magnetic Agarose Beads Thermo Scientific 78602
ChromoTek V5-Trap Agarose Proteintech V5ta-20
Bacterial and virus strains
BL21 Competent E. coli NEB C2530H
Chemicals, peptides and recombinant proteins
Glutathione (reduced) Thermo Scientific 78259
D-(+)-Maltose monohydrate SUPELCO 47288
Normal goat serum Life technologies PCN5000
PBS GIBCO 70011
Hoechst Invitrogen 33342
Vectashield Vector Laboratories H-1200
LysoTracker Deep Red Invitrogen L12492
Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Single-Use Cocktail, EDTA-Free (100X) Thermo Scientific 78445
PMSF Roche 10837091001
Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
PINK1-GFP Hong Xu N/A
Rtnl1–3×Flag-V5 This study N/A
Atl-3×Flag-V5 This study N/A
Keap1–3×Flag-V5 This study N/A
UAS-Bip-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 This study N/A
Atg9 D51 Guangchao Chen N/A
Vps34 m22 Thomas Neufeld N/A
Atl 2 James McNew N/A
Rtnl1 1W James McNew N/A
Park 25 Leo Pallanck N/A
PINK1 B9 Jongkyeong Chung N/A
PINK1 5 Ming Guo N/A
Atg16 Δ Eric Baehrecke N/A
Atg8 Δ This study N/A
Park Δ This study N/A
BNIP3 Δ This study N/A
Keap1 036 Dirk Bohmann N/A
ARE-GFP Dirk Bohmann N/A
Cnc 1223 Fengwei Yu N/A
Cul3GFT2, FRT40A Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center 23866
vasa-Cas9 Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center 56552
vasa-Cas9 Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center 51324
UAS-Cas9 Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center 67078
UAS-mitoGFP Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center 8442
UAS-mitoGFP Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center 8443
Vps13D MI11101 Bloomington Drosophila stock center 56282
Df(3L)BSC631 Bloomington Drosophila stock center 25722
Park (TKO.GS00852) Bloomington Drosophila stock center 77064
Atg1 RNAi Vienna Drosophila Resource Center 16133
Atg9 RNAi Vienna Drosophila Resource Center 10045
PINK1 RNAi Bloomington Drosophila stock center 38262
PINK1 RNAi Bloomington Drosophila stock center 55886
Vps13D RNAi Vienna Drosophila RNAi Cente 41792
Luciferase RNAi Bloomington Drosophila stock center 31603
BNIP3 (WKO.3-C11) Bloomington Drosophila stock center 82537
Keap1 RNAi Bloomington Drosophila stock center 40932
His2Av-mRFP, FRT2A Bloomington Drosophila stock center 34498
HsFlp, Ubi-nlsRFP, FRT19A Bloomington Drosophila stock center 31416
HsFlp, His2Av-GFP, FRT19A Bloomington Drosophila stock center 32045
hsFlp(D5) Bloomington Drosophila stock center 55814
hsFlp; FRT42D,Ubi-nlsRFP Eric Baehrecke N/A
hsFlp; Ubi-nlsRFP, FRT40A Eric Baehrecke N/A
hsFlp;;FRT82B, Ubi-nlsRFP Eric Baehrecke N/A
hsFlp;;His2Av-mRFP, FRT2A This study N/A
hsFlp;;Sec61a-GFP, Act(CD2)Gal4, UAS-dsRed This study N/A
hsFlp; UAS-Cas9; Sec61a-GFP, Act(CD2)Gal4, UAS-dsRed This study N/A
hsFlp; FRT42D This study N/A
hsFlp;;FRT82B This study N/A
hsFlp;;FRT2A This study N/A
FRT19A;hsFlp This study N/A
Tub-Gal4 Eric Baehrecke N/A
NP1-Gal4 Eric Baehrecke N/A
Sec61α-GFP Vienna Drosophila RNAi Cente (VDRC) 318343
Trp1K13305, FRT40A Kyoto Drosophila Genetic Resource Center 114350
Recombinant DNA
U6droBsagRNA Drosophila Genomics Resources Center 1341
pCFD3.1-w-dU6:3gRNA Addgene 123366
pUASTattB Drosophila Genomics Resources Center 1419
pCR 2.1-TOPO TA vector Invitrogen 450641
Oligonucleotides (See Table S2 for a list of oligonucleotides)
Software and Algorithms
Image J NIH https://imagej.nih.govij/
Image Studio Lite Ver 5.2 LI-COR https://www.licor.com/bio/image-studio-lite/
Prism Graphpad Software https://www.graphpac.com/scientific-software/prism/
ZEN Zeiss https://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/us/prodats/microscopesoftware/;en.html
NIS-Elements Nikon https://www.microscope.healthcare.nikon.com/products/software/nis-elements

METHOD DETAILS

Fly stocks

Flies were reared at 25 °C on standard cornmeal-molasses-agar media. PINK1-GFP was a gift from Hong Xu29. Atg9D51 was a gift from G. Chen44. Vps34m22 was a gift from Thomas Neufeld45. Alt2 46 and Rtnl11W 47 were gifts from James McNew. Park25 48 were gifts from Leo Pallanck. PINK1B9 was a gift from Jongkyeong Chung30. PINK15 was a gift from Ming Guo31. Keap1036 was a gift from Dirk Bohmann36. Cnc1223 was a gift from Fengwei Yu49.

To generate UAS-ss-Rtnl1-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5, the coding region flanked by 15 bp homologous arms (Table S2) was synthesized by IDT (San Diego, California) and assembled into a pUAST-attB vector using the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Takara, 639650). Plasmid DNA was injected by Bestgene (Chino Hills, California) into a strain carrying either attP40 or attP2 landing sites, and integrated into either the second or the third chromosome of the Drosophila genome using phiC31 integrase.

The Atg8a loss-of-function mutant Atg8aΔ strain was created using the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing50. sgRNA targeting sequences are provided (Table S2). A 0.8 kb gblock flanking the region of deletion was synthesized by IDT (San Diego, California) and inserted into a TOPO vector (Invitrogen, 450641). gRNAs and donors were co-injected into vasa-Cas9 transgenic flies with different chromosome of Cas9 insertion against target gene localized chromosome. Germline injection was done by Bestgene (Chino Hills, California). Progeny were collected and screened for Atg8a deletion by DNA sequencing.

The Parkin loss-of-function ParkΔ FRT2A strain was created by crossing vas-Cas9; FRT2A with Park gRNA transgenic flies (gRNA sequence provided in Table S2). The BNIP3 loss-of-function BNIP3Δ strain was generated by crossing vas-Cas9 with BNIP3 dual-gRNA transgenic flies (gRNA sequence provided in (Table S2). Progeny were collected and screened for deletion by DNA sequencing (sequencing primers provided in Table S2).

Gene editing to tag Rtnl1, Atl and Keap1

Rtnl1, Atl and Keap1 encoded proteins were tagged on their C-termini with 3×Flag-V5 separated by a 15 amino acids poly-glycine peptide linker (GGGGSGLRSSRGPFE) by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. gRNAs were designed by https://flycrispr.org/ and https://www.flyrnai.org/crispr3/web/ with low off-target score and high frame shift score and selected against off-targeting on the gene located chromosome. We used two gRNAs flanking the Rtnl1 stop codon, one gRNA proximal to the Atl stop codon and two gRNAs flanking the Keap1 stop codon for gene editing. gRNA oligonucleotides were synthesized by IDT and subcloned into pCFD2-dU6:3 gRNA (Addgene). Related guide RNA sequences are provided in Table S2. We designed 600–800 bp homologous arms for each gene and all PAM sequences were silent mutations unless the PAM was located in the intron or 3’-UTR regions. Homologous directed repair donor templates were synthesized by IDT and subcloned into TOPO vectors (Invitrogen). gBlock sequences are provided in Table S2. gRNAs and donors were co-injected into vasa-Cas9 transgenic flies with a different chromosome of Cas9 insertion against target gene located chromosome. Germline injection was conducted by Bestgene (Chino Hills, California). Progeny were collected and screened for precise insertions by DNA sequencing.

Induction of mosaic RNAi/mutant cell clones and whole intestine RNAi expression

Mosaic dsRed positive RNAi- and transgene-expressing cell clones and fluorescent-negative cell clones were induced as described23. To induce RNAi-expressing cell clones in the intestine, virgin female hsFlp;; Sec61α-GFP, Act>CD2>GAL4, UAS-dsRed were crossed with RNAi line males. One-day-old eggs were heat shocked at 37 °C for 5 minutes. To induce BNIP3wko CRISPR mutant cell clones the midgut, virgin female hsFlp; UAS-Cas9; Sec61α-GFP, Act>CD2>GAL4, UAS-dsRed were crossed with male BNIP3wko. One-day-old eggs were heat shocked at 37 °C for 15 minutes. To induce loss-of-function cell clones, 0–4 hour-old embryos were heat shocked at 37 °C for 1 hour. Myo31DFNP0001 (NP1-GAL4) was used to drive RNAi expression in the whole intestine.

Protein expression and purification

The coding regions of Drosophila Atl, Rtnl1, Trp1 and Atg8a cDNAs from clones GH09383, LD14068, RE23984 and LD05816 (Drosophila Genomics Resource Center, Bloomington, IN, USA) were amplified using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB, M0492S) with primers in Table S2, and subcloned into pMAL-c5X (NEB N8108S) MBP and pGEX-6P-2 GST (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) expression vectors. Mutations in putative LC3/GABARAP/Atg8a interacting regions (LIR) of Atl (EAGRA), Trp1 (AAVWA, DAEIA, EALDA) that were predicted by software (https://ilir.warwick.ac.uk/search.php) were mutated with primers in Table S2 using Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (NEB, E0554S) so that two essential amino acids were replaced by alanine. MBP alone, MBP-Atl and LIR mutant ATL, MBP-Rtnl1, MBP-Trp1 and LIR mutant Trp1, and GST-Atg8a were expressed in E. coli BL21, immobilized with either MBP magnetic beads (NEB, E8037S) or Glutathione magnetic beads in binding (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % β-ME, protease inhibitor cocktail) and wash buffer (1% Triton-X100, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % β-ME, protease inhibitor cocktail). MBP tagged proteins were eluted in maltose elution buffer (10 mM maltose, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5), and GST-Atg8a was eluted in glutathione elution buffer (10 mM glutathione, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5).

Atg8a binding assay

20 μg of GST-Atg8a protein was immobilized onto glutathione magnetic beads in Atg8a binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % β-ME, protease inhibitor cocktail) for 30 minutes at 4 °C. Atg8a binding beads were then incubated with 20 μg MBP-Rtnl1, MBP-Atl, MBP-Trp1 and relatives containing putative LIR mutant proteins for 2 hours at 4 °C. The beads were washed 6 times with wash buffer (1% Triton-X100, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % β-ME, protease inhibitor cocktail) and resuspended in 2xLaemli sample buffer. The samples were separated using 4%−20% SDS-PAGE, transferred, and antibody against MBP (HRP conjugated, 1:20000, NEB, E8038) was used to detect MBP-fusion proteins. Atg8a was detected using antibody against GABARAP (1:1000, Cell signaling, 13733).

Immunolabeling and microscopy

Intestines were dissected from staged animals in PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS 0.3% Triton X-100 (PBST), and blocked with goat serum for 2 hours before incubating with primary antibodies in 0.3% PBST with 5% goat serum. We used mouse anti-Calnexin (1:100), rabbit anti-Ref(2)p/p62 (1:200), mouse anti-ATP5A (1:200), mouse anti-dsDNA (1:40), rabbit anti-phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, 1:200, E5T1W), mouse anti-ubiquitin (1:200, P4D1), mouse anti-conjugated ubiquitin (1:200, UBCJ2), mouse anti-GFP (1:200), mouse anti-V5 (1:200), rabbit anti-V5 (1:200), and rabbit anti-FLAG (1:200) for immunostaining. All secondary antibodies (1:200) were incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. Hoechst 33342 dye was used to stain DNA. Tissues were mounted in VectaShield.

Samples were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope equipped with a Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.40 Oil DIC M27 objective using Zeiss Zen Software and a Nikon A1R HD25 confocal microscope equipped with a CFI Plan Apochromat 60x/1.4 Oil DIC objective NIS-Elements Viewer software. Images collected with the Nikon confocal microscope were further magnified by 2.88. Images were deconvoluted using NIS-Elements C software and processed with Fiji51.

LysoTracker staining

Fly intestines expressing the Rtnl1-pHluorin-mKate2 sensor were dissected 2 hours after pupariation in PBS, and incubated with LysoTracker Deep Red (1:300, Invitrogen, L12492) and Hoechst 33342 DNA stain (1:100) in PBS at room temperature for 10–15 minutes. Intestines were mounted in VectaShield and immediately imaged by confocal microscopy.

Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation

Intestines from 20 staged Drosophila were dissected 2 hours after puparium formation in prechilled PBS for each genotype, including those expressing RNAis and UAS-ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 driven by NP1-GAL4, homozygous mutants, and respective controls, and homogenized in 2xSDS sample buffer (2% SDS, 63 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail and 1 mM PMSF. 20 μg of protein measured by BCA protein assay from each genotype lysate was mixed with LDS sample buffer analyzed by western and immunoblotted with mouse anti-Calnexin (1:1000), rabbit anti-Ref(2)p (1:1000), rabbit anti-phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, 1:1000, E2J6T), mouse anti-ubiquitin (1:1000, P4D1), mouse anti-V5 (1:2000), mouse anti-GFP (1:2000) and mouse anti-Actin (1:1000) antibodies.

For immunoprecipitation experiments, intestines from 70–90 staged Drosophila were dissected 2 hours APF in prechilled PBS for each genotype. A subgroup of 20–30 intestines of each genotype were ground in 40 μl prechilled freshly made co-immunoprecipitation (COIP) buffer (1% Triton X-100, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 142.5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2,1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail and 1 mM PMSF. All subgroup lysates of each genotype were placed on ice until dissection was completed, and then merged and supplemented with COIP buffer to 500 μl for an extra 1 hour of incubation at 4 °C with rotation. 15–20 μl of total lysates (input) were collected and mixed with LDS sample buffer followed by boiling. 600–700 mg proteins of each genotype as determined by BCA protein assay were incubated with 20 μl of V5-Trap agarose beads supplemented with COIP buffer to 1 ml at 4 °C overnight with rotation. Agarose beads were washed 5 times with COIP buffer for 20 minutes at 4 °C with rotation and eluted with LDS sample buffer followed by boiling. Both input lysates and immunoprecipitated lysates were analyzed by western and immunoblotted with mouse anti-ubiquitin (P4D1, 1:1000), mouse anti-V5 (1:1000), rabbit anti-V5 (1:1000) and mouse anti-Actin (1:1000) antibodies.

Transmission electron microscopy

As previously described23, intestines were dissected in PBS 2 hours after pupariation, fixed over night at 4°C in a solution of 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, osmicated, and washed in distilled water. Preparations were stained en bloc in 1% aqueous uranyl acetate and dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, treated with propylene oxide and infiltrated in SIP-pon/Araldite for embedding. Ultrathin sections of the anterior region of the midgut were collected and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. For each genotype, at least 3 intestines were embedded and sectioned for analyses and quantification. Imaging was performed using a Phillips CM10 TEM.

QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Fiji51 was used to quantify immunofluorescence intensity and puncta in images. Fiji and Image Studio Lite were used to quantify protein levels in western blot analyses. p-values were calculated using either a two-tailed unpaired t-test, Kruskal-Wallis H test or One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey’s post-hoc test or Fisher’s LSD test from Graphpad Prism 5 (https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/). The number (n) of samples analyzed by immunostaining represents number of enterocytes cells from at least 4 independent animals from each genotype. No animals were excluded from statistical analyses, the experiments were not randomized, and the investigators were not blinded. All error bars are SEM.

Supplementary Material

1

Figure S1. Autophagy regulates ER clearance during development, related to Figure 1 (A) Schematic of the fly Atg8aΔ mutant that was generated by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to create a 378 bp deletion of exon 2 and exon 3.

(B) Genotyping of heterozygous Atg8aΔ mutant fly and control w1118 fly.

(C and C’) Vps34m22 loss-of-function mutant cells (lacking RFP, white dotted line) exhibit increased Sec61α-GFP intensity (green) compared to neighboring heterozygous control intestine cells (red) 2 hours after puparium formation (APF).

(D) Quantification of Sec61α mean intensity (mean intst) in Vps34 mutant cells compared to respective control cells. n = 4 (Ctrl) cells and n = 3 (Vps34m22) cells were measured.

(E and E’) Atg9D51 loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) possess increased Calnexin and Ref(2)p 2 hours APF.

(F) Quantification of Calnexin mean intensity (mean intst) in Atg9 mutant intestine cells compared to control cells. n = 12 (Ctrl), n = 12 (Atg9D51) cells were measured.

(G and G’) Atg16Δ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) possess increased Calnexin and Ref(2)p compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF.

(H) Quantification of Calnexin mean intensity (mean intst) in Atg16 mutant cells compared to control cells after pupariation. n = 12 (Ctrl), n = 12 (Atg16Δ) cells were measured.

(I) Vps34m22 loss-of-function mutant cells (white dotted line) possess increased Calnexin and Ref(2)p compared to neighboring control intestine cells 2 hours APF.

(J) Quantification of Calnexin mean intensity (mean intst) in Vps34 mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n = 12 (Ctrl) and n = 12 (Vps34m22) cells were measured.

(K) Cells expressing ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 sensor in intestine cells of feeding third larva instar exhibit similar ss-pH-KDEL and ss-mK2-KDEL fluorescence in ER-like structures.

(L) Atg16Δ loss-of-function mutant feeding third larval instar intestines possess similar sspHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 (ss-PK-KDEL-V5) compared to control intestines (Ctrl, Larva). After pupariation, Atg16Δ mutant intestines possess increased ss-PK-KDEL-V5 compared to control intestines (Ctrl, APF). The sensor was detected by antibody against V5 and Actin was used as loading control.

(M) Quantification of ss-PK-KDEL-V5 ratio to Actin normalized to larva control.

(N) Atg16Δ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) that express ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 (ss-PK-KDEL) in all cells exhibit increased cell size and decreased ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta (red puncta, mK2) co-localization with lysosomal lysotracker (gray) compared to respective neighboring control cells. ss-pHluorin-KDEL (green) does not co-localize with lysotracker in either Atg16 mutant cells or control cells.

(O) Quantification of the ratio of ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localized with lysotracker of total ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta in Atg16 mutant cells compared to respective neighboring control cells. n = 6 (Ctrl), n = 6 (Atg16Δ), cells were measured.

Scale bars in lower magnification represent 20 μm and scale bars in insets represent 5 μm.

Insets in (N) are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle = Atg16 mutant cell, yellow rectangle = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001 from One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test and unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

2

Figure S2. Putative Atg8a binding with and relationship between ER-phagy receptors, related to Figure 2 (A) Conservation of human RTN3, ATL3 and SEC62 in Drosophila melanogaster.

(B) Alignment of human ATL3 and fly Atl.

(C) Interaction of MBP, fly wild-type Atl (MBP-Atl WT) and Atl putative LIR mutant (MBP-EAGRA) with GST-Atg8a.

(D) Quantification of MBP, MBP-Atl WT and MBP-Atl EAGRA normalized to MBP.

(E) Alignment of human SEC62 and fly Trp1.

(F) Interaction of MBP, fly wild-type Trp1 (MBP-Trp1 WT), or Trp1 putative LIR mutants (MBPAAVWA, MBP-EALDA or MBP-DAEIA) with GST-Atg8a.

(G) Quantification of the ratio of MBP, MBP-Trp1 WT and Trp1 putative LIR mutants (MBPAAVWA, MBP-EALDA and MBP-DAEIA) of GST-Atg8a normalized to MBP.

(H) Schematic of in-frame tagging of Rtnl1 isoforms. The C-termini of all Rtnl1 protein isoforms were fused with 3×Flag-V5. Rtnl1 isoforms and the 3×Flag-V5 tags were separated by a 15 amino acid linker.

(I) Schematic of in-frame tagging of Atl isoforms. The C-termini of all Atl protein isoforms were fused with 3×Flag-V5. Atl isoforms and the 3×Flag-V5 tags were separated by a 15 amino acid linker.

(J-J”) Intestines from animals containing Rtnl1–3xFlag-V5 possess increased Rtnl1 (green, detected by anti-V5 antibody) in Atl2 loss-of-function mutant enterocyte cells (white dotted line) compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF. Calnexin (CANX, red) was used to label mutant cells and serve as an additional ER marker.

(K) Quantification of Rtnl1 intensity in Atl mutant cells compared to control cells. n (Ctrl) = 27, n (Atl2) = 29 cells were measured. Scale bar represents 20 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ****, p<0.0001, from unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, ****, p<0.0001 from One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test and unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

3

Figure S3. Vps13D is required for ER-phagy and BNIP3 is required for mitophagy during development, related to Figure 3 (A) Vps13D knockdown cells expressing Vps13D RNAi (red, white dotted line) and Sec61α-GFP (green) possess increased Sec61α-GFP intensity compared to neighboring control cells (lacking dsRed) 2 hours APF.

(B) Quantification of Sec61α-GFP mean intensity (mean intst) in Vps13D knockdown cells compared to neighboring control cells. n = 5 (Ctrl), n = 5 (Vps13DIR) cells were measured.

(C and D) TEM images reveal increased and dilated ER in Vps13D ΔUBA/Df(3L)BSC613 (G, ΔUBA/Df) intestine cells compared to control w1118 (F, Ctrl) intestine cells 2 hours APF. White arrowhead indicates ER in an autophagic structure, and yellow arrowheads indicate dilated ER.

(E) Conservation of human BNIP3 with CG5059 in Drosophila melanogaster.

(F) Two essential amino acids (red bold) in the LC3-interacting-region of human BNIP3 LIR motif are conserved in the fly.

(G) Diagram of the new BNIP3 mutant allele with 41 base pair (bp) deletion in exon 1 creating a frame shift and an early stop codon 87 bp downstream of the deletion generated by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.

(H and I) Homozygous BNIP3Δ loss-of-function mutant intestines (I) expressing ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 (ss-PK-KDEL) sensor exhibit increased co-localization of ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta (red, mK2) with lysotracker (gray, lyso) compared to control intestines (H).

(J) Quantification of ratio of lysotracker co-localized red ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta/total ssmKate2-KDEL puncta (%). n (Ctrl) = 9, n = 10 (BNIP3Δ) cells were measured.

Scale bars in (A and inset), and (H-I) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in (D) represent 0.2 μm. Scale bars in (H and I) right panel insets represent 5 μm. Insets in (H and I) are from indicated rectangles. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *, p<0.05, ***, p<0.001 from unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

4

Figure S4. PINK1 is required for ER-phagy during development, related to Figure 4 (A and A’) PINK1B9 loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) that express Mito-GFP (green) in all cells exhibit increased large Mito-GFP puncta and increased intensity of Calnexin (red, CANX) compared to neighboring control cells (smaller Mito-GFP puncta).

(B) Quantification of mean intensity of calnexin (CANX) in PINK1B9 mutant cells compared to control cells. n (Ctrl) = 5, n (PINK1B9) = 5 cells were measured.

(C to C”) PINK1 knockdown cells expressing PINK1 RNAi (HMC04160) and dsRed (red, white dotted line) exhibit increased intensity of Sec61α-GFP (green) and increased ATP5A puncta (magenta) compared to neighboring control cells after pupariation.

(D) Quantification of Sec61α-GFP mean intensity (mean intst) compared to control cells. n (Ctrl) = 7, n (PINK1IR) = 7 cells were measured.

(E to E”) PINK1 knockdown cells expressing PINK1 RNAi (HMS01707) and dsRed (red, white dotted line) exhibit increased intensity of Sec61α-GFP (green) and increased ATP5A puncta (magenta) compared to neighboring control cells.

(F) Quantification of Sec61α-GFP mean intensity (mean intst) compared to control cells. n (Ctrl) = 8, n (PINK1IR) = 8 cells were measured.

(G to I) Both male PINK1B9 loss-of-function intestines (H) and male PINK15 loss-of-function intestines (I) that express ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 exhibit decreased ss-mKate2 puncta (red) co-localization with lysotracker (gray) and increased ss-mKate2-KDEL co-localization with ss-pHluorin-KDEL (green) compared to control w1118 intestine cells (G). Insets are from yellow rectangle regions.

(J) Quantification of the ratio of ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localized with lysotracker of total ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta. n (Ctrl) = 11, n (PINK1B9) = 5, n (PINK15) = 8 cells were measured.

(K) Western blot analysis of PINK1-GFP that was tagged at the endogenous PINK1 locus with GFP in female and male in the 3rd instar larval (larva) and 2 hours after puparium formation (APF) stages. PINK1 was detected by antibody against GFP. A w1118 strain without the GFP tag was used as negative control.

(L) Quantification of the ratio of all PINK1 bands to actin, and normalized to w1118. n= 3 independent experiments.

(M) Wild-type intestine cells containing PINK1-GFP (detected with GFP antibody, green) exhibit co-localization of PINK1 and ATP5A (red) puncta at 2 hours APF.

(N) Wild-type intestine cells containing PINK1-GFP (detected with GFP antibody, green) and Rtnl1–3xFlag-V5 (detected by anti-V5 antibody, red) exhibit little to no PINK1 and Rtnl1 co-localization at 2 hours APF.

Scale bars in (A), (C), (E) and insets, (G) to (I), (M) to (N) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in the (G) to (I) and (M) to (N) insets represent 5 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001 from One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test and unpaired, two tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

5

Figure S5. Parkin deficiency inhibits clearance of mitochondria and results in elevated phospho-ubiquitin, related to Figure 5 (A) Diagram of the new Parkin (ParkΔ) mutant allele with 13 bp deletion in exon 1 creating a frame shift and an early stop codon 24 bp downstream of the deletion.

(B) ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (lacking RFP in the nuclei, white dotted line) expressing Mito-GFP (green) in all cells exhibit elevated ATP5A and larger Mito-GFP puncta compared to respective neighboring control cells (red nuclei) 2 hours APF.

(C) Quantification of ATP5A puncta per nm2 in ParkΔ mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 5 (Ctrl), n = 5 (ParkΔ) cells were measured.

(D) ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) expressing Mito-GFP (green) in all cells exhibit increased larger Mito-GFP (green), ATP5A puncta (red) and Ref(2)p puncta (magenta) compared to neighboring control cells (less and smaller Mito-GFP and ATP5A puncta) 2 hours APF. Mitochondria markers were used to locate ParkΔ mutant clones.

(E) Quantification of Ref(2)p puncta (>2 μm) in ParkΔ mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 6 (Ctrl), n = 6 (ParkΔ) cells were measured.

(F) ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) expressing Mito-GFP (green) in all cells exhibit increased larger Mito-GFP (green), ATP5A (red), and increased mitochondria localized and cytoplasmic phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, magenta) puncta compared to neighboring control cells with less smaller Mito-GFP and ATP5A puncta 2 hours APF.

Mitochondria markers were used to locate ParkΔ mutant clones.

(G) Quantification of phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65) mean intensity (mean intst) in ParkΔ mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 5 (Ctrl), n = 5 (ParkΔ) cells were measured.

(H) ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line), and expressing PINK1-GFP in all intestine cells, exhibited elevated level of phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, red, p-Ubi) puncta and ATP5A puncta (magenta), and increased PINK1 puncta (green) stained by antibody against GFP compared to neighboring control cells (less p-Ubi and ATP5A puncta) 2 hours APF. Phospho-ubiquitin and ATP5A were used to locate ParkΔ mutant clones.

(I) Quantification of PINK1 mean intensity (mean intst) in ParkΔ mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 16 (Ctrl), n = 16 (ParkΔ) cells were measured.

(J) ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) that express Mito-GFP (green) in all cells exhibit increased larger Mito-GFP (green) and elevated levels of phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, p-Ubi) puncta (magenta), but similar level of pan-ubiquitin puncta (P4D1, red) compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF. Mito-GFP and phospho-ubiquitin were used to locate ParkΔ mutant clones. White arrowheads indicate co-localized Mito-GFP and phospho-ubiquitin puncta.

(K) Quantification of pan-ubiquitin (P4D1) mean intensity (mean intst) compared to control cells. n = 7 (Ctrl), n = 7 (ParkΔ) cells were measured.

(L) Intestines from animals containing Atl-3×Flag-V5 possess similar amounts of Atl (magenta, detected with V5 antibody) that is slightly co-localized with phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, green) in ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant enterocyte cells (white dotted line, non-red nuclei) compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF.

(M) Quantification of co-localization of Atl with phospho-ubiquitin puncta in Park mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n (Ctrl) = 10, n (ParkΔ) = 10 cells were quantified.

Scale bars in (B”), (D), (F), (H), (J), (L) and inset (B”) represent 20 μm and scale bars in (D), (F), (H), (J) and (L) insets represent 5 μm. Insets in (D), (F), (H) and (J) are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle = ParkΔ mutant cell, yellow rectangle = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s. = not significant, *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001 from unpaired n.s. = not significant from unpaired, two tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

6

Figure S6. Keap1 regulates ER-phagy, related to Figure 6 (A) Keap1036 loss-of-function mutant cells (white dotted line, lacking red) expressing an AREGFP (green) in all cells exhibit increased level of GFP compared to neighboring control cells.

(B) Quantification of GFP intensity in Keap1036 mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n (Ctrl) = 8, n (Keap1036) = 8 cells were quantified.

(C and D) CNCΔ loss-of-function mutant cells (C, non-red) possessed less Ref(2)p puncta (green) compared to Keap1036 loss-of-function mutant cells (D, non-red).

(E) Quantification of Ref(2)p puncta in CNC and Keap1 mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n (Ctrl) = 8, n (CNCΔ) = 9, n (Keap1036) = 8 cells were analyzed.

(F and G) Keap1036, CNCΔ loss-of-function double mutant cells (G, white dotted line) exhibit similar intensity of calnexin (CANX, magenta) compared to Keap1036 loss-of-function single mutant cells (F, white dotted line), and increased intensity of calnexin compared to neighboring control cells.

(H) Quantification of calnexin intensity of Keap1,CNC double mutant and Keap1 single mutant cells compared to relative neighboring control cells. Calnexin intensity of mutant cells were normalized to relative control cells. n (Ctrl) = 10, n (Keap1036) = 5, n (CNCΔ, Keap1036) = 10 cells were analyzed.

(I) Keap1036 loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) that express ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 (ss-PK-KDEL) in all cells exhibit decreased ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta (red puncta) co-localized with lysosomal lysotracker (gray, smaller) compared to neighboring control cells with larger lysotracker puncta.

(J) Quantification of ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localized with lysotracker in Keap1 mutant cells compared to respective control cells. n = 6 (Ctrl), n = 7 (Keap1036), cells were measured.

(K) Keap1036 loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) that express Mito-GFP (green) in all cells possess increased co-localized Ref(2)p (red) puncta and conjugated ubiquitin puncta (magenta, UBCJ2) compared to neighboring control cells. Ref(2)p and conjugated ubiquitin puncta are not associated with Mito-GFP puncta in Keap1 mutant cells. White arrowheads indicate co-localized Ref(2)p puncta and conjugated ubiquitin puncta.

(L) Quantification of Ref(2)p puncta (size>2 μm) of Keap1 mutant cells compared to respective control cells. n = 8 (Ctrl), n = 8 (Keap1036), cells were measured.

(M) Keap1 Atg16 (Keap1036, Atg16Δ) double homozygous mutant intestine cells possess increased mitochondrial DNA (dsDNA, magenta) co-localization with Mito-GFP puncta (green), and increased phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, red, p-Ubi) co-localization with Mito-GFP puncta compared to neighboring heterozygous Keap1036/+ Atg16Δ/+ control cells.

(N) Quantification of average Mito-GFP co-localization with dsDNA puncta per nm2 (Avg Mito-dsDNA/nm2) of Keap1 Atg16 double mutant cells compared to respective control cells. n = 5 (Ctrl), n = 5 (Keap1036, Atg16Δ) cells were measured.

Scale bars in (A), (C), (D), (F) and inset, (G) and inset, (I), (K), and (M) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in (I), (K), and (M) insets represent 5 μm. Insets in (I), (K) and (M) are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle = Keap1 mutant cell, yellow rectangle = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001, from One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test and unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

7

Figure S7. Parkin deficiency promotes Keap1 localization with phospho-ubiquitin, related to Figure 7 (A) Schematic of in-frame tagging of Keap1 isoforms. The C-termini of all Keap1 protein isoforms were fused with 3×Flag-V5. Keap1 isoforms and the 3×Flag-V5 tags were separated by a 15 amino acid linker.

(B and B’) Intestines from animals that contain Keap1–3×Flag-V5 possess increased Keap1 (green, detected by anti-V5 antibody) and increased ATP5A puncta (magenta) in Atg9D51 mutant enterocyte cells (white dotted line) compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF. Atg9D51 mutant cells also possess increased Keap1 co-localization with ATP5A puncta compared to control cells. ATP5A was used to label mutant cells. Arrows indicate co-localization.

(C) Quantification of Keap1 intensity of Atg9 mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n (Ctrl) = 11, n (Atg9D51) = 11 cells were analyzed.

(D and D’) Intestines from animals that contain Keap1–3×Flag-V5 exhibit increased Keap1 (magenta, detected by anti-V5 antibody) co-localization with phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65) puncta (p-Ubi, green) in ParkΔ mutant enterocyte cells compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF. Arrows indicate co-localization.

(E) Quantification of Keap1 puncta co-localization with phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65) puncta of Parkin mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n (Ctrl) = 23, n (ParkΔ) = 23 cells were analyzed.

Scale bars in (B’), (D) right conner, and (D’) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in (B) and (D) insets at the right panel represent 5 μm. Insets in (B) and (D) right panels are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle = mutant cell, yellow rectangle = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s. = not significant, *, p<0.05, ****, p<0.0001 from unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

8
9

Table S2. Oligonucleotides and gBlocks, related to STAR Methods

Highlights.

  • Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) clearance by autophagy occurs during development

  • ER clearance requires PINK1 kinase

  • The ubiquitin E3 ligase Parkin is required for clearance of mitochondria but not ER

  • Keap1 is required for ubiquitylation of Rtnl1 and clearance of ER

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank F. Yu, G. Chen, H. Xu, J.A. McNew, L.J. Pallanck, Vienna Drosophila Resource Center, Bloomington Drosophila stock center, and Kyoto Drosophila Genetic Resource Center for flies, the Electron Microscopy Core Facility at UMass Chan Medical School, and I. Dikic, F. Kraus and J.W. Harper for advice. This work was supported by R35GM131689 to E.H.B and F30CA239374 to J.L.S..

Footnotes

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS:

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hubner CA, and Dikic I (2020). ER-phagy and human diseases. Cell Death Differ 27, 833–842. 10.1038/s41418-019-0444-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pickles S, Vigie P, and Youle RJ (2018). Mitophagy and Quality Control Mechanisms in Mitochondrial Maintenance. Curr Biol 28, R170–R185. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jin SM, Lazarou M, Wang C, Kane LA, Narendra DP, and Youle RJ (2010). Mitochondrial membrane potential regulates PINK1 import and proteolytic destabilization by PARL. J Cell Biol 191, 933–942. 10.1083/jcb.201008084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim Y, Park J, Kim S, Song S, Kwon SK, Lee SH, Kitada T, Kim JM, and Chung J (2008). PINK1 controls mitochondrial localization of Parkin through direct phosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 377, 975–980. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shiba-Fukushima K, Imai Y, Yoshida S, Ishihama Y, Kanao T, Sato S, and Hattori N (2012). PINK1-mediated phosphorylation of the Parkin ubiquitin-like domain primes mitochondrial translocation of Parkin and regulates mitophagy. Sci Rep 2, 1002. 10.1038/srep01002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ordureau A, Sarraf SA, Duda DM, Heo JM, Jedrychowski MP, Sviderskiy VO, Olszewski JL, Koerber JT, Xie T, Beausoleil SA, et al. (2014). Quantitative proteomics reveal a feedforward mechanism for mitochondrial PARKIN translocation and ubiquitin chain synthesis. Mol Cell 56, 360–375. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Koyano F, Okatsu K, Kosako H, Tamura Y, Go E, Kimura M, Kimura Y, Tsuchiya H, Yoshihara H, Hirokawa T, et al. (2014). Ubiquitin is phosphorylated by PINK1 to activate parkin. Nature 510, 162–166. 10.1038/nature13392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wauer T, Simicek M, Schubert A, and Komander D (2015). Mechanism of phosphoubiquitin-induced PARKIN activation. Nature 524, 370–374. 10.1038/nature14879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kane LA, Lazarou M, Fogel AI, Li Y, Yamano K, Sarraf SA, Banerjee S, and Youle RJ (2014). PINK1 phosphorylates ubiquitin to activate Parkin E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. J Cell Biol 205, 143–153. 10.1083/jcb.201402104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lazarou M, Sliter DA, Kane LA, Sarraf SA, Wang C, Burman JL, Sideris DP, Fogel AI, and Youle RJ (2015). The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy. Nature 524, 309–314. 10.1038/nature14893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abudu YP, Shrestha BK, Zhang W, Palara A, Brenne HB, Larsen KB, Wolfson DL, Dumitriu G, Oie CI, Ahluwalia BS, et al. (2021). SAMM50 acts with p62 in piecemeal basal- and OXPHOS-induced mitophagy of SAM and MICOS components. J Cell Biol 220. 10.1083/jcb.202009092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khaminets A, Heinrich T, Mari M, Grumati P, Huebner AK, Akutsu M, Liebmann L, Stolz A, Nietzsche S, Koch N, et al. (2015). Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum turnover by selective autophagy. Nature 522, 354–358. 10.1038/nature14498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mochida K, Oikawa Y, Kimura Y, Kirisako H, Hirano H, Ohsumi Y, and Nakatogawa H (2015). Receptor-mediated selective autophagy degrades the endoplasmic reticulum and the nucleus. Nature 522, 359–362. 10.1038/nature14506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fumagalli F, Noack J, Bergmann TJ, Cebollero E, Pisoni GB, Fasana E, Fregno I, Galli C, Loi M, Solda T, et al. (2016). Translocon component Sec62 acts in endoplasmic reticulum turnover during stress recovery. Nat Cell Biol 18, 1173–1184. 10.1038/ncb3423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grumati P, Morozzi G, Holper S, Mari M, Harwardt MI, Yan R, Muller S, Reggiori F, Heilemann M, and Dikic I (2017). Full length RTN3 regulates turnover of tubular endoplasmic reticulum via selective autophagy. Elife 6. 10.7554/eLife.25555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chino H, Hatta T, Natsume T, and Mizushima N (2019). Intrinsically Disordered Protein TEX264 Mediates ER-phagy. Mol Cell 74, 909–921 e906. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen Q, Xiao Y, Chai P, Zheng P, Teng J, and Chen J (2019). ATL3 Is a Tubular ER-Phagy Receptor for GABARAP-Mediated Selective Autophagy. Curr Biol 29, 846–855 e846. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liang JR, Lingeman E, Ahmed S, and Corn JE (2018). Atlastins remodel the endoplasmic reticulum for selective autophagy. J Cell Biol 217, 3354–3367. 10.1083/jcb.201804185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nthiga TM, Kumar Shrestha B, Sjottem E, Bruun JA, Bowitz Larsen K, Bhujabal Z, Lamark T, and Johansen T (2020). CALCOCO1 acts with VAMP-associated proteins to mediate ER-phagy. EMBO J 39, e103649. 10.15252/embj.2019103649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chang TK, Shravage BV, Hayes SD, Powers CM, Simin RT, Wade Harper J, and Baehrecke EH (2013). Uba1 functions in Atg7- and Atg3-independent autophagy. Nat Cell Biol 15, 1067–1078. 10.1038/ncb2804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shen JL, Fortier TM, Wang R, and Baehrecke EH (2021). Vps13D functions in a Pink1-dependent and Parkin-independent mitophagy pathway. J Cell Biol 220. 10.1083/jcb.202104073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hu Y, Flockhart I, Vinayagam A, Bergwitz C, Berger B, Perrimon N, and Mohr SE (2011). An integrative approach to ortholog prediction for disease-focused and other functional studies. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 357. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Anding AL, Wang C, Chang TK, Sliter DA, Powers CM, Hofmann K, Youle RJ, and Baehrecke EH (2018). Vps13D Encodes a Ubiquitin-Binding Protein that Is Required for the Regulation of Mitochondrial Size and Clearance. Curr Biol 28, 287295.e286. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shen JL, Fortier TM, Zhao YG, Wang R, Burmeister M, and Baehrecke EH (2021). Vmp1, Vps13D, and Marf/Mfn2 function in a conserved pathway to regulate mitochondria and ER contact in development and disease. Curr Biol. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang R, Miao G, Shen JL, Fortier TM, and Baehrecke EH (2022). ESCRT dysfunction compromises endoplasmic reticulum maturation and autophagosome biogenesis in Drosophila. Curr Biol 32, 1262–1274 e1264. 10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Novak I, Kirkin V, McEwan DG, Zhang J, Wild P, Rozenknop A, Rogov V, Lohr F, Popovic D, Occhipinti A, et al. (2010). Nix is a selective autophagy receptor for mitochondrial clearance. EMBO Rep 11, 45–51. 10.1038/embor.2009.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ordureau A, Kraus F, Zhang J, An H, Park S, Ahfeldt T, Paulo JA, and Harper JW (2021). Temporal proteomics during neurogenesis reveals large-scale proteome and organelle remodeling via selective autophagy. Mol Cell 81, 5082–5098 e5011. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang T, Xue L, Li L, Tang C, Wan Z, Wang R, Tan J, Tan Y, Han H, Tian R, et al. (2016). BNIP3 Protein Suppresses PINK1 Kinase Proteolytic Cleavage to Promote Mitophagy. Journal of Biological Chemistry 291, 21616–21629. 10.1074/jbc.M116.733410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang Y, Wang ZH, Liu Y, Chen Y, Sun N, Gucek M, Zhang F, and Xu H (2019). PINK1 Inhibits Local Protein Synthesis to Limit Transmission of Deleterious Mitochondrial DNA Mutations. Mol Cell 73, 1127–1137 e1125. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Park J, Lee SB, Lee S, Kim Y, Song S, Kim S, Bae E, Kim J, Shong M, Kim JM, and Chung J (2006). Mitochondrial dysfunction in Drosophila PINK1 mutants is complemented by parkin. Nature 441, 1157–1161. 10.1038/nature04788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Clark IE, Dodson MW, Jiang C, Cao JH, Huh JR, Seol JH, Yoo SJ, Hay BA, and Guo M (2006). Drosophila pink1 is required for mitochondrial function and interacts genetically with parkin. Nature 441, 1162–1166. 10.1038/nature04779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Komatsu M, Kurokawa H, Waguri S, Taguchi K, Kobayashi A, Ichimura Y, Sou YS, Ueno I, Sakamoto A, Tong KI, et al. (2010). The selective autophagy substrate p62 activates the stress responsive transcription factor Nrf2 through inactivation of Keap1. Nat Cell Biol 12, 213–223. 10.1038/ncb2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Taguchi K, Fujikawa N, Komatsu M, Ishii T, Unno M, Akaike T, Motohashi H, and Yamamoto M (2012). Keap1 degradation by autophagy for the maintenance of redox homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 13561–13566. 10.1073/pnas.1121572109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kobayashi A, Kang MI, Okawa H, Ohtsuji M, Zenke Y, Chiba T, Igarashi K, and Yamamoto M (2004). Oxidative stress sensor Keap1 functions as an adaptor for Cul3based E3 ligase to regulate proteasomal degradation of Nrf2. Mol Cell Biol 24, 71307139. 10.1128/MCB.24.16.7130-7139.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang DD, Lo SC, Cross JV, Templeton DJ, and Hannink M (2004). Keap1 is a redox-regulated substrate adaptor protein for a Cul3-dependent ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol Cell Biol 24, 10941–10953. 10.1128/MCB.24.24.10941-10953.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sykiotis GP, and Bohmann D (2008). Keap1/Nrf2 signaling regulates oxidative stress tolerance and lifespan in Drosophila. Dev Cell 14, 76–85. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tooze SA, and Yoshimori T (2010). The origin of the autophagosomal membrane. Nat Cell Biol 12, 831–835. 10.1038/ncb0910-831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Phillips MJ, and Voeltz GK (2016). Structure and function of ER membrane contact sites with other organelles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17, 69–82. 10.1038/nrm.2015.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pickrell AM, and Youle RJ (2015). The roles of PINK1, parkin, and mitochondrial fidelity in Parkinson’s disease. Neuron 85, 257–273. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gonzalez A, Covarrubias-Pinto A, Bhaskara RM, Glogger M, Kuncha SK, Xavier A, Seemann E, Misra M, Hoffmann ME, Brauning B, et al. (2023). Ubiquitination regulates ER-phagy and remodelling of endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 618, 394–401. 10.1038/s41586-023-06089-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Foronda H, Fu Y, Covarrubias-Pinto A, Bocker HT, Gonzalez A, Seemann E, Franzka P, Bock A, Bhaskara RM, Liebmann L, et al. (2023). Heteromeric clusters of ubiquitinated ER-shaping proteins drive ER-phagy. Nature 618, 402–410. 10.1038/s41586-023-06090-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shibata Y, Hu J, Kozlov MM, and Rapoport TA (2009). Mechanisms shaping the membranes of cellular organelles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 25, 329–354. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gubas A, and Dikic I (2022). ER remodeling via ER-phagy. Mol Cell 82, 1492–1500. 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wen JK, Wang YT, Chan CC, Hsieh CW, Liao HM, Hung CC, and Chen GC (2017). Atg9 antagonizes TOR signaling to regulate intestinal cell growth and epithelial homeostasis in Drosophila. Elife 6. 10.7554/eLife.29338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Juhasz G, Hill JH, Yan Y, Sass M, Baehrecke EH, Backer JM, and Neufeld TP (2008). The class III PI(3)K Vps34 promotes autophagy and endocytosis but not TOR signaling in Drosophila. J Cell Biol 181, 655–666. 10.1083/jcb.200712051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lee M, Paik SK, Lee MJ, Kim YJ, Kim S, Nahm M, Oh SJ, Kim HM, Yim J, Lee CJ, et al. (2009). Drosophila Atlastin regulates the stability of muscle microtubules and is required for synapse development. Dev Biol 330, 250–262. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wakefield S, and Tear G (2006). The Drosophila reticulon, Rtnl-1, has multiple differentially expressed isoforms that are associated with a sub-compartment of the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell Mol Life Sci 63, 2027–2038. 10.1007/s00018-006-6142-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Greene JC, Whitworth AJ, Kuo I, Andrews LA, Feany MB, and Pallanck LJ (2003). Mitochondrial pathology and apoptotic muscle degeneration in Drosophila parkin mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 4078–4083. 10.1073/pnas.0737556100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chew LY, Zhang H, He J, and Yu F (2021). The Nrf2-Keap1 pathway is activated by steroid hormone signaling to govern neuronal remodeling. Cell Rep 36, 109466. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gratz SJ, Ukken FP, Rubinstein CD, Thiede G, Donohue LK, Cummings AM, and O’Connor-Giles KM (2014). Highly specific and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-catalyzed homology-directed repair in Drosophila. Genetics 196, 961–971. 10.1534/genetics.113.160713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9, 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Figure S1. Autophagy regulates ER clearance during development, related to Figure 1 (A) Schematic of the fly Atg8aΔ mutant that was generated by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to create a 378 bp deletion of exon 2 and exon 3.

(B) Genotyping of heterozygous Atg8aΔ mutant fly and control w1118 fly.

(C and C’) Vps34m22 loss-of-function mutant cells (lacking RFP, white dotted line) exhibit increased Sec61α-GFP intensity (green) compared to neighboring heterozygous control intestine cells (red) 2 hours after puparium formation (APF).

(D) Quantification of Sec61α mean intensity (mean intst) in Vps34 mutant cells compared to respective control cells. n = 4 (Ctrl) cells and n = 3 (Vps34m22) cells were measured.

(E and E’) Atg9D51 loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) possess increased Calnexin and Ref(2)p 2 hours APF.

(F) Quantification of Calnexin mean intensity (mean intst) in Atg9 mutant intestine cells compared to control cells. n = 12 (Ctrl), n = 12 (Atg9D51) cells were measured.

(G and G’) Atg16Δ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) possess increased Calnexin and Ref(2)p compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF.

(H) Quantification of Calnexin mean intensity (mean intst) in Atg16 mutant cells compared to control cells after pupariation. n = 12 (Ctrl), n = 12 (Atg16Δ) cells were measured.

(I) Vps34m22 loss-of-function mutant cells (white dotted line) possess increased Calnexin and Ref(2)p compared to neighboring control intestine cells 2 hours APF.

(J) Quantification of Calnexin mean intensity (mean intst) in Vps34 mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n = 12 (Ctrl) and n = 12 (Vps34m22) cells were measured.

(K) Cells expressing ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 sensor in intestine cells of feeding third larva instar exhibit similar ss-pH-KDEL and ss-mK2-KDEL fluorescence in ER-like structures.

(L) Atg16Δ loss-of-function mutant feeding third larval instar intestines possess similar sspHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 (ss-PK-KDEL-V5) compared to control intestines (Ctrl, Larva). After pupariation, Atg16Δ mutant intestines possess increased ss-PK-KDEL-V5 compared to control intestines (Ctrl, APF). The sensor was detected by antibody against V5 and Actin was used as loading control.

(M) Quantification of ss-PK-KDEL-V5 ratio to Actin normalized to larva control.

(N) Atg16Δ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) that express ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 (ss-PK-KDEL) in all cells exhibit increased cell size and decreased ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta (red puncta, mK2) co-localization with lysosomal lysotracker (gray) compared to respective neighboring control cells. ss-pHluorin-KDEL (green) does not co-localize with lysotracker in either Atg16 mutant cells or control cells.

(O) Quantification of the ratio of ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localized with lysotracker of total ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta in Atg16 mutant cells compared to respective neighboring control cells. n = 6 (Ctrl), n = 6 (Atg16Δ), cells were measured.

Scale bars in lower magnification represent 20 μm and scale bars in insets represent 5 μm.

Insets in (N) are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle = Atg16 mutant cell, yellow rectangle = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001 from One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test and unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

2

Figure S2. Putative Atg8a binding with and relationship between ER-phagy receptors, related to Figure 2 (A) Conservation of human RTN3, ATL3 and SEC62 in Drosophila melanogaster.

(B) Alignment of human ATL3 and fly Atl.

(C) Interaction of MBP, fly wild-type Atl (MBP-Atl WT) and Atl putative LIR mutant (MBP-EAGRA) with GST-Atg8a.

(D) Quantification of MBP, MBP-Atl WT and MBP-Atl EAGRA normalized to MBP.

(E) Alignment of human SEC62 and fly Trp1.

(F) Interaction of MBP, fly wild-type Trp1 (MBP-Trp1 WT), or Trp1 putative LIR mutants (MBPAAVWA, MBP-EALDA or MBP-DAEIA) with GST-Atg8a.

(G) Quantification of the ratio of MBP, MBP-Trp1 WT and Trp1 putative LIR mutants (MBPAAVWA, MBP-EALDA and MBP-DAEIA) of GST-Atg8a normalized to MBP.

(H) Schematic of in-frame tagging of Rtnl1 isoforms. The C-termini of all Rtnl1 protein isoforms were fused with 3×Flag-V5. Rtnl1 isoforms and the 3×Flag-V5 tags were separated by a 15 amino acid linker.

(I) Schematic of in-frame tagging of Atl isoforms. The C-termini of all Atl protein isoforms were fused with 3×Flag-V5. Atl isoforms and the 3×Flag-V5 tags were separated by a 15 amino acid linker.

(J-J”) Intestines from animals containing Rtnl1–3xFlag-V5 possess increased Rtnl1 (green, detected by anti-V5 antibody) in Atl2 loss-of-function mutant enterocyte cells (white dotted line) compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF. Calnexin (CANX, red) was used to label mutant cells and serve as an additional ER marker.

(K) Quantification of Rtnl1 intensity in Atl mutant cells compared to control cells. n (Ctrl) = 27, n (Atl2) = 29 cells were measured. Scale bar represents 20 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ****, p<0.0001, from unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, ****, p<0.0001 from One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test and unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

3

Figure S3. Vps13D is required for ER-phagy and BNIP3 is required for mitophagy during development, related to Figure 3 (A) Vps13D knockdown cells expressing Vps13D RNAi (red, white dotted line) and Sec61α-GFP (green) possess increased Sec61α-GFP intensity compared to neighboring control cells (lacking dsRed) 2 hours APF.

(B) Quantification of Sec61α-GFP mean intensity (mean intst) in Vps13D knockdown cells compared to neighboring control cells. n = 5 (Ctrl), n = 5 (Vps13DIR) cells were measured.

(C and D) TEM images reveal increased and dilated ER in Vps13D ΔUBA/Df(3L)BSC613 (G, ΔUBA/Df) intestine cells compared to control w1118 (F, Ctrl) intestine cells 2 hours APF. White arrowhead indicates ER in an autophagic structure, and yellow arrowheads indicate dilated ER.

(E) Conservation of human BNIP3 with CG5059 in Drosophila melanogaster.

(F) Two essential amino acids (red bold) in the LC3-interacting-region of human BNIP3 LIR motif are conserved in the fly.

(G) Diagram of the new BNIP3 mutant allele with 41 base pair (bp) deletion in exon 1 creating a frame shift and an early stop codon 87 bp downstream of the deletion generated by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.

(H and I) Homozygous BNIP3Δ loss-of-function mutant intestines (I) expressing ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 (ss-PK-KDEL) sensor exhibit increased co-localization of ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta (red, mK2) with lysotracker (gray, lyso) compared to control intestines (H).

(J) Quantification of ratio of lysotracker co-localized red ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta/total ssmKate2-KDEL puncta (%). n (Ctrl) = 9, n = 10 (BNIP3Δ) cells were measured.

Scale bars in (A and inset), and (H-I) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in (D) represent 0.2 μm. Scale bars in (H and I) right panel insets represent 5 μm. Insets in (H and I) are from indicated rectangles. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *, p<0.05, ***, p<0.001 from unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

4

Figure S4. PINK1 is required for ER-phagy during development, related to Figure 4 (A and A’) PINK1B9 loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) that express Mito-GFP (green) in all cells exhibit increased large Mito-GFP puncta and increased intensity of Calnexin (red, CANX) compared to neighboring control cells (smaller Mito-GFP puncta).

(B) Quantification of mean intensity of calnexin (CANX) in PINK1B9 mutant cells compared to control cells. n (Ctrl) = 5, n (PINK1B9) = 5 cells were measured.

(C to C”) PINK1 knockdown cells expressing PINK1 RNAi (HMC04160) and dsRed (red, white dotted line) exhibit increased intensity of Sec61α-GFP (green) and increased ATP5A puncta (magenta) compared to neighboring control cells after pupariation.

(D) Quantification of Sec61α-GFP mean intensity (mean intst) compared to control cells. n (Ctrl) = 7, n (PINK1IR) = 7 cells were measured.

(E to E”) PINK1 knockdown cells expressing PINK1 RNAi (HMS01707) and dsRed (red, white dotted line) exhibit increased intensity of Sec61α-GFP (green) and increased ATP5A puncta (magenta) compared to neighboring control cells.

(F) Quantification of Sec61α-GFP mean intensity (mean intst) compared to control cells. n (Ctrl) = 8, n (PINK1IR) = 8 cells were measured.

(G to I) Both male PINK1B9 loss-of-function intestines (H) and male PINK15 loss-of-function intestines (I) that express ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 exhibit decreased ss-mKate2 puncta (red) co-localization with lysotracker (gray) and increased ss-mKate2-KDEL co-localization with ss-pHluorin-KDEL (green) compared to control w1118 intestine cells (G). Insets are from yellow rectangle regions.

(J) Quantification of the ratio of ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localized with lysotracker of total ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta. n (Ctrl) = 11, n (PINK1B9) = 5, n (PINK15) = 8 cells were measured.

(K) Western blot analysis of PINK1-GFP that was tagged at the endogenous PINK1 locus with GFP in female and male in the 3rd instar larval (larva) and 2 hours after puparium formation (APF) stages. PINK1 was detected by antibody against GFP. A w1118 strain without the GFP tag was used as negative control.

(L) Quantification of the ratio of all PINK1 bands to actin, and normalized to w1118. n= 3 independent experiments.

(M) Wild-type intestine cells containing PINK1-GFP (detected with GFP antibody, green) exhibit co-localization of PINK1 and ATP5A (red) puncta at 2 hours APF.

(N) Wild-type intestine cells containing PINK1-GFP (detected with GFP antibody, green) and Rtnl1–3xFlag-V5 (detected by anti-V5 antibody, red) exhibit little to no PINK1 and Rtnl1 co-localization at 2 hours APF.

Scale bars in (A), (C), (E) and insets, (G) to (I), (M) to (N) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in the (G) to (I) and (M) to (N) insets represent 5 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001 from One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test and unpaired, two tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

5

Figure S5. Parkin deficiency inhibits clearance of mitochondria and results in elevated phospho-ubiquitin, related to Figure 5 (A) Diagram of the new Parkin (ParkΔ) mutant allele with 13 bp deletion in exon 1 creating a frame shift and an early stop codon 24 bp downstream of the deletion.

(B) ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (lacking RFP in the nuclei, white dotted line) expressing Mito-GFP (green) in all cells exhibit elevated ATP5A and larger Mito-GFP puncta compared to respective neighboring control cells (red nuclei) 2 hours APF.

(C) Quantification of ATP5A puncta per nm2 in ParkΔ mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 5 (Ctrl), n = 5 (ParkΔ) cells were measured.

(D) ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) expressing Mito-GFP (green) in all cells exhibit increased larger Mito-GFP (green), ATP5A puncta (red) and Ref(2)p puncta (magenta) compared to neighboring control cells (less and smaller Mito-GFP and ATP5A puncta) 2 hours APF. Mitochondria markers were used to locate ParkΔ mutant clones.

(E) Quantification of Ref(2)p puncta (>2 μm) in ParkΔ mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 6 (Ctrl), n = 6 (ParkΔ) cells were measured.

(F) ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) expressing Mito-GFP (green) in all cells exhibit increased larger Mito-GFP (green), ATP5A (red), and increased mitochondria localized and cytoplasmic phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, magenta) puncta compared to neighboring control cells with less smaller Mito-GFP and ATP5A puncta 2 hours APF.

Mitochondria markers were used to locate ParkΔ mutant clones.

(G) Quantification of phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65) mean intensity (mean intst) in ParkΔ mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 5 (Ctrl), n = 5 (ParkΔ) cells were measured.

(H) ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line), and expressing PINK1-GFP in all intestine cells, exhibited elevated level of phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, red, p-Ubi) puncta and ATP5A puncta (magenta), and increased PINK1 puncta (green) stained by antibody against GFP compared to neighboring control cells (less p-Ubi and ATP5A puncta) 2 hours APF. Phospho-ubiquitin and ATP5A were used to locate ParkΔ mutant clones.

(I) Quantification of PINK1 mean intensity (mean intst) in ParkΔ mutant cells compared to control cells. n = 16 (Ctrl), n = 16 (ParkΔ) cells were measured.

(J) ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) that express Mito-GFP (green) in all cells exhibit increased larger Mito-GFP (green) and elevated levels of phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, p-Ubi) puncta (magenta), but similar level of pan-ubiquitin puncta (P4D1, red) compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF. Mito-GFP and phospho-ubiquitin were used to locate ParkΔ mutant clones. White arrowheads indicate co-localized Mito-GFP and phospho-ubiquitin puncta.

(K) Quantification of pan-ubiquitin (P4D1) mean intensity (mean intst) compared to control cells. n = 7 (Ctrl), n = 7 (ParkΔ) cells were measured.

(L) Intestines from animals containing Atl-3×Flag-V5 possess similar amounts of Atl (magenta, detected with V5 antibody) that is slightly co-localized with phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, green) in ParkΔ loss-of-function mutant enterocyte cells (white dotted line, non-red nuclei) compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF.

(M) Quantification of co-localization of Atl with phospho-ubiquitin puncta in Park mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n (Ctrl) = 10, n (ParkΔ) = 10 cells were quantified.

Scale bars in (B”), (D), (F), (H), (J), (L) and inset (B”) represent 20 μm and scale bars in (D), (F), (H), (J) and (L) insets represent 5 μm. Insets in (D), (F), (H) and (J) are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle = ParkΔ mutant cell, yellow rectangle = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s. = not significant, *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001 from unpaired n.s. = not significant from unpaired, two tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

6

Figure S6. Keap1 regulates ER-phagy, related to Figure 6 (A) Keap1036 loss-of-function mutant cells (white dotted line, lacking red) expressing an AREGFP (green) in all cells exhibit increased level of GFP compared to neighboring control cells.

(B) Quantification of GFP intensity in Keap1036 mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n (Ctrl) = 8, n (Keap1036) = 8 cells were quantified.

(C and D) CNCΔ loss-of-function mutant cells (C, non-red) possessed less Ref(2)p puncta (green) compared to Keap1036 loss-of-function mutant cells (D, non-red).

(E) Quantification of Ref(2)p puncta in CNC and Keap1 mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n (Ctrl) = 8, n (CNCΔ) = 9, n (Keap1036) = 8 cells were analyzed.

(F and G) Keap1036, CNCΔ loss-of-function double mutant cells (G, white dotted line) exhibit similar intensity of calnexin (CANX, magenta) compared to Keap1036 loss-of-function single mutant cells (F, white dotted line), and increased intensity of calnexin compared to neighboring control cells.

(H) Quantification of calnexin intensity of Keap1,CNC double mutant and Keap1 single mutant cells compared to relative neighboring control cells. Calnexin intensity of mutant cells were normalized to relative control cells. n (Ctrl) = 10, n (Keap1036) = 5, n (CNCΔ, Keap1036) = 10 cells were analyzed.

(I) Keap1036 loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) that express ss-pHluorin-mKate2-KDEL-V5 (ss-PK-KDEL) in all cells exhibit decreased ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta (red puncta) co-localized with lysosomal lysotracker (gray, smaller) compared to neighboring control cells with larger lysotracker puncta.

(J) Quantification of ss-mKate2-KDEL puncta co-localized with lysotracker in Keap1 mutant cells compared to respective control cells. n = 6 (Ctrl), n = 7 (Keap1036), cells were measured.

(K) Keap1036 loss-of-function mutant intestine cells (white dotted line) that express Mito-GFP (green) in all cells possess increased co-localized Ref(2)p (red) puncta and conjugated ubiquitin puncta (magenta, UBCJ2) compared to neighboring control cells. Ref(2)p and conjugated ubiquitin puncta are not associated with Mito-GFP puncta in Keap1 mutant cells. White arrowheads indicate co-localized Ref(2)p puncta and conjugated ubiquitin puncta.

(L) Quantification of Ref(2)p puncta (size>2 μm) of Keap1 mutant cells compared to respective control cells. n = 8 (Ctrl), n = 8 (Keap1036), cells were measured.

(M) Keap1 Atg16 (Keap1036, Atg16Δ) double homozygous mutant intestine cells possess increased mitochondrial DNA (dsDNA, magenta) co-localization with Mito-GFP puncta (green), and increased phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65, red, p-Ubi) co-localization with Mito-GFP puncta compared to neighboring heterozygous Keap1036/+ Atg16Δ/+ control cells.

(N) Quantification of average Mito-GFP co-localization with dsDNA puncta per nm2 (Avg Mito-dsDNA/nm2) of Keap1 Atg16 double mutant cells compared to respective control cells. n = 5 (Ctrl), n = 5 (Keap1036, Atg16Δ) cells were measured.

Scale bars in (A), (C), (D), (F) and inset, (G) and inset, (I), (K), and (M) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in (I), (K), and (M) insets represent 5 μm. Insets in (I), (K) and (M) are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle = Keap1 mutant cell, yellow rectangle = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001, from One-Way ANOVA corrected by Tukey post-hoc test and unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

7

Figure S7. Parkin deficiency promotes Keap1 localization with phospho-ubiquitin, related to Figure 7 (A) Schematic of in-frame tagging of Keap1 isoforms. The C-termini of all Keap1 protein isoforms were fused with 3×Flag-V5. Keap1 isoforms and the 3×Flag-V5 tags were separated by a 15 amino acid linker.

(B and B’) Intestines from animals that contain Keap1–3×Flag-V5 possess increased Keap1 (green, detected by anti-V5 antibody) and increased ATP5A puncta (magenta) in Atg9D51 mutant enterocyte cells (white dotted line) compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF. Atg9D51 mutant cells also possess increased Keap1 co-localization with ATP5A puncta compared to control cells. ATP5A was used to label mutant cells. Arrows indicate co-localization.

(C) Quantification of Keap1 intensity of Atg9 mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n (Ctrl) = 11, n (Atg9D51) = 11 cells were analyzed.

(D and D’) Intestines from animals that contain Keap1–3×Flag-V5 exhibit increased Keap1 (magenta, detected by anti-V5 antibody) co-localization with phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65) puncta (p-Ubi, green) in ParkΔ mutant enterocyte cells compared to neighboring control cells 2 hours APF. Arrows indicate co-localization.

(E) Quantification of Keap1 puncta co-localization with phospho-ubiquitin (serine 65) puncta of Parkin mutant cells compared to neighboring control cells. n (Ctrl) = 23, n (ParkΔ) = 23 cells were analyzed.

Scale bars in (B’), (D) right conner, and (D’) represent 20 μm. Scale bars in (B) and (D) insets at the right panel represent 5 μm. Insets in (B) and (D) right panels are from indicated rectangles (white rectangle = mutant cell, yellow rectangle = control cell). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s. = not significant, *, p<0.05, ****, p<0.0001 from unpaired, two-tailed t-test. Representative of 3 or more independent biological experiments.

8
9

Table S2. Oligonucleotides and gBlocks, related to STAR Methods

Data Availability Statement

  • Microscopy data and original western blot images reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request.

  • No original code was used in this study.

  • Any additional information required to reanalyze the data in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

RESOURCES