Abstract
This study discovers the complement protein profile in the aqueous humor (AH) of human subjects and investigates its association with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) pathogenesis. Among the 32 complement proteins identified, 22 were highly abundant and detected in more than 50% of AH samples. The most predominant active complement proteins in the AH are C3, C4B, C4A, CFB, CFD, and C9. Additionally, the most prevalent complement regulators and receptors include CLU, SERPING1, F2, CFH, CFI, and VTN. Significant alterations in complement proteins were observed in individuals with POAG compared to those with cataracts. Specifically, complement protein F2 was upregulated, while C8G, C6, and CFH were downregulated in POAG samples. Stratification of the samples by race and sex revealed distinct alterations of complement proteins in patients with POAG. In the African American cohort, five complement proteins (C4A, C4B, F2, C7, and C3) were upregulated in POAG compared to cataract patients. In the Caucasian cohort, eight complement proteins (C3, SERPING1, CFI, CLU, CFHR1, C8G, C6, and CFH) were downregulated in the POAG samples compared to the cataract samples. Within the male cohort, three complement proteins (CLU, C6, and CFH) were downregulated in POAG patients compared to those with cataracts. Whereas, within the female cohort, two complement proteins (C4B and F2) were upregulated and one (C8G) downregulated in the POAG samples when compared to cataracts. Discerning these changes in the AH complement protein profile will assist in the development of tailored therapies to modulate the complement system for managing ocular disorders. These insights may also lead to novel biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring disease progression.
Keywords: glaucoma, POAG, complement proteins, aqueous humor, proteomics, mass spectrometry
1. Introduction
The ocular environment exhibits a unique combination of immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory characteristics referred to as ocular immune privilege [1,2]. Several mechanisms contribute to maintaining this privilege, including mucosal immunity [3,4], blood–ocular barriers [5,6,7,8], ocular parenchymal cells [9], and the secretion of regulatory molecules in the vitreous and aqueous humor [10,11]. However, disruption in any of these pathways can disturb the ocular immune privilege, leading to the development of ocular pathophysiological conditions [12,13,14,15,16].
The aqueous humor (AH) serves various vital functions, including the regulation of intraocular pressure (IOP), the removal of metabolic waste, and the supply of nutrients and oxygen to non-vascular ocular tissues [17]. The AH also contains a significant concentration of immunomodulatory molecules [17], including the prominent complement family [18].
Complement proteins are involved in various host defense and inflammatory responses, playing an essential role in immune modulation within the eye [19,20,21]. Previous studies have shown that alterations in complement proteins within the AH are associated with the pathogenesis of various ocular disorders, including primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), uveitis, and macular degeneration [22,23,24]. Additionally, inhibiting components of the complement cascade have shown promise in preventing synaptic degeneration in experimental models of glaucoma [25,26].
The objective of this study is to investigate the presence of complement proteins in the AH of human subjects and examine their association with POAG pathogenesis. In this study, we quantified the levels of complement proteins in the AH of 258 subjects who underwent either glaucoma or cataract surgeries. Furthermore, we evaluated the association of these proteins with POAG, considering potential differences based on sex and race.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Augusta University (IRB #611480), and written informed consent was acquired from all participants prior to sample collection. Subjects undergoing cataract or glaucoma surgery were included. During the surgical procedure, after making the initial corneal incision, ~60 μL AH was aspirated from the anterior chamber using a cortical cleaving hydrodissector (Beaver-Visitec International #585157). The samples were carefully collected in sterile tubes and immediately frozen at −80 °C. No additional ocular procedures or modifications were performed during the AH collection process. The study included 196 AH samples from cataract surgery patients and 62 AH samples from POAG patients, as outlined in Table 1. Additional patient information is available in Supplementary File S1.
Table 1.
Demographic information of the subjects.
| Demographic Characteristic | Cataract (n = 196) | POAG (n = 62) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years, mean ± SD) | 67.38 ± 9.48 | 67.87 ± 11.23 | 0.76 a |
| Sex (F/M) | 122/74 | 38/24 | 1 b |
| Race (African Americans/Caucasians) | 107/89 | 38/24 | 0.44 b |
a: two-sample t-test b: chi-square test.
2.2. Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis
The AH samples (60 μL) were subjected to lyophilization and then reconstituted in 30 μL of 8 M urea in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8). Cysteine residues were reduced using 20 mM dithiothreitol and alkylated with 55 mM iodoacetamide. Subsequently, 240 μL of a 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer was added to reduce the urea concentration to less than 1 mM. The protein concentration was determined using a Bradford assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein digestion was performed by adding trypsin at a 1:20 ratio (w/w) and incubating overnight at 37 °C.
The digested AH samples were purified using a C18 spin plate (Nest Group, Southborough, MA, USA), and the resulting peptides were separated using an Ultimate 3000 nano-UPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and analyzed using an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A 6 μL portion of the reconstituted peptide mixture was trapped and washed on a Pepmap100 C18 trap (5 μm, 0.3 × 5 mm) at a flow rate of 20 μL/min using a solution of 2% acetonitrile in water with 0.1% formic acid for 10 min. The peptides were then separated on a Pepman100 RSLC C18 column (2.0 μm, 75 μm × 150 mm) using a gradient of 2% to 40% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid over 120 min (flow rate: 300 nL/min; column temperature: 40 °C). Eluted peptides were subjected to data-dependent acquisition in positive mode with the following settings: precursor scan in the Orbitrap MS analyzer at 120,000 FWHM from 300 to 1500 m/z, and MS/MS scans in top speed mode (2-s cycle time) using the ion-trap MS analyzer. Dynamic exclusion settings were applied (repeat count: 1; repeat duration: 15 s; exclusion duration: 30 s). Higher-energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) was employed as the fragmentation method with a normalized collision energy of 30%.
2.3. Protein Identification and Quantification
The raw MS data were processed using Proteome Discoverer software (v1.4; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and analyzed with the SequestHT algorithm. The search was performed against the Uniprot-SwissProt human database, which contained 20,385 entries. The search parameters were set as follows: 10 ppm precursor ion tolerance and 0.6 Da product ion tolerance; static carbidomethylation (+57.021 Da) for cysteine; dynamic oxidation (+15.995 Da) for methionine; and dynamic phosphorylation (+79.966 Da) for serine, threonine, and tyrosine.
To validate peptide spectrum matches (PSMs), the Percolator peptide spectrum matching validator within the Proteome Discoverer software was utilized. Proteins with similar peptide compositions that could not be differentiated based on MS/MS analysis alone were grouped using parsimony principles. Spectrum counts (number of PSMs) and identities for each protein were then exported as a semi-quantitative measure of the relative protein levels detected in each AH sample.
2.4. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and Heidelberg Retinal Tomography (HRT) Measurements
Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was measured using SPECTRALIS Tracking Laser Tomography (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). This system captured a 24-line high-resolution radial scan, 3.5 mm in diameter, of the optic nerve head centered on Bruch’s membrane opening (BMO). The region between the BMO and the closest point on the internal limiting membrane was defined as the “neuroretinal rim”. Three circular scans centered on the optic nerve head, as delineated by the BMO, were used to determine RNFL thickness. The results were compared to a reference database of healthy eyes, adjusted for BMO size and age. The findings were presented in the Garway–Heath sector format, facilitating structural and functional correlations. In addition, the ganglion cell layer (GCL) and the macula were evaluated using multi-layer segmentation software, and the results were visualized through a GCL thickness map.
The Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) was also employed for imaging the optic nerve head. Multiple 3D images were captured at different depths, providing a comprehensive representation of the optic nerve and surrounding retina. These images were combined to generate a 3D representation of the entire optic nerve, from which various stereometric parameters were calculated. These parameters include the cup shape measure, cup-to-disc area ratio, and rim volume. The cup shape measure quantifies the configuration of the cup, incorporating assessments of cup wall steepness and depth variation. In individuals without glaucomatous damage, this measure is generally negative. Conversely, glaucomatous eyes typically exhibit values that are less negative or positive [27]. The cup-to-disc area ratio assesses the extent of cupping relative to the area of the optic disc. In patients with uncontrolled glaucoma, this ratio tends to increase over time. Lastly, the rim area assesses the neuroretinal rim, which marks the boundary between the cup and the disc. Among patients with glaucoma, this metric is typically lower, indicating the degradation or loss of nerve fibers within the neuroretinal rim.
2.5. Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were conducted using the R project for Statistical Computing (version 3.6.3). The chi-square test and two-tailed t-test were used to compare the clinical characteristics of POAG and cataract patients. Prior to analysis, the peptide spectrum matching (PSM) values obtained from the LC-MS/MS analysis were quantile normalized, and the proportion of samples in which each protein was detected was determined. Disease-specific differences in complement protein levels were assessed using a negative binomial regression model. Spearman’s correlation coefficients were employed to evaluate the correlations between complement proteins and clinical parameters, such as OCT and HRT measures. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Complement Proteins Detected in the Human Aqueous Humor
According to the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, there are a total of 56 proteins that belong to the complement system group, including 27 complement system activation components and 29 complement system regulators and receptors (https://www.genenames.org; accessed on 17 July 2023) [28]. In the 258 human aqueous humor samples analyzed, 32 out of the 56 complement proteins known in the human proteome were detected (Figure 1). Complete data files are available in Supplementary File S2.
Figure 1.
Complement proteins detected in the human aqueous humor. A total of 32 complement proteins were detected in the human AH samples analyzed. The mean PSM values were log2 transformed for comparison.
The mean PSM values and the proportion of samples in which each specific complement protein was detected are provided in Table 2. Among these proteins, 22 were detected in more than 50% of the AH samples, while 6 were detected in all 258 samples. The most abundant complement proteins identified were as follows, listed with their respective mean PSM values ± standard deviation (SD): complement C3 (227.59 ± 68.1), complement C4B (134.07 ± 64.43), complement C4A (112.39 ± 77.95), clusterin (CLU) (95.22 ± 40.97), and complement factor B (CFB) (52.12 ± 13.43) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Complement system proteins detected in the human aqueous humor.
| UniProt ID | Gene Symbol | Description | Mean PSM Value (±SD) | Proportion of Samples Detected (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activation Components | ||||
| P01024 | C3 | Complement C3 | 227.59 ± 68.1 | 100.0 |
| P0C0L5 | C4B | Complement C4B | 134.07 ± 64.43 | 96.5 |
| P0C0L4 | C4A | Complement C4-A | 112.39 ± 77.95 | 79.8 |
| P00751 | CFB | Complement factor B | 52.12 ± 13.43 | 100 |
| P00746 | CFD | Complement factor D | 11.32 ± 6.3 | 99.2 |
| P02748 | C9 | Complement component C9 | 11.03 ± 8.76 | 93.8 |
| P00736 | C1R | Complement C1r subcomponent | 6.92 ± 5.76 | 85.7 |
| P10643 | C7 | Complement component C7 | 5.14 ± 4.49 | 91.5 |
| P09871 | C1S | Complement C1s subcomponent | 3.26 ± 3.33 | 76.4 |
| P07357 | C8A | Complement component C8 alpha chain | 3.13 ± 2.59 | 90.3 |
| P13671 | C6 | Complement component C6 | 2.57 ± 2.72 | 74.8 |
| P07358 | C8B | Complement component C8 beta chain | 1.91 ± 2.62 | 54.7 |
| P07360 | C8G | Complement component C8 gamma chain | 1.58 ± 1.63 | 65.9 |
| P01031 | C5 | Complement C5 | 1.55 ± 2.16 | 58.9 |
| P06681 | C2 | Complement C2 | 1.11 ± 1.43 | 54.7 |
| P02747 | C1QC | Complement C1q subcomponent subunit C | 0.81 ± 1.2 | 43.0 |
| P02746 | C1QB | Complement C1q subcomponent subunit B | 0.36 ± 0.6 | 29.8 |
| O00187 | MASP2 | Mannan-binding lectin serine protease 2 | 0.09 ± 0.31 | 8.1 |
| O00602 | FCN1 | Ficolin-1 | ND | ND |
| P48740 | MASP1 | Mannan-binding lectin serine protease 1 | ND | ND |
| P02745 | C1QA | Complement C1q subcomponent subunit A | ND | ND |
| P27918 | CFP | Properdin | ND | ND |
| O75636 | FCN3 | Ficolin-3 | ND | ND |
| P11226 | MBL2 | Mannose-binding protein C | ND | ND |
| Q9BWP8 | COLEC11 | Collectin subfamily member 11 | ND | ND |
| Q15485 | FCN2 | Ficolin-2 | ND | ND |
| Q9Y6Z7 | COLEC10 | Collectin subfamily member 10 | ND | ND |
| Regulators and Receptors | ||||
| P10909 | CLU | Clusterin | 95.22 ± 40.97 | 100.0 |
| P05155 | SERPING1 | Plasma protease C1 inhibitor | 35.57 ± 12.07 | 100.0 |
| P00734 | F2 | Prothrombin | 31.86 ± 15.52 | 100.0 |
| P08603 | CFH | Complement factor H | 21.11 ± 12.14 | 98.1 |
| P05156 | CFI | Complement factor I | 19.12 ± 7.18 | 100.0 |
| P04004 | VTN | Vitronectin | 14.92 ± 6.39 | 98.1 |
| Q03591 | CFHR1 | Complement factor H-related protein 1 | 3.85 ± 4.28 | 54.7 |
| P36980 | CFHR2 | Complement factor H-related protein 2 | 0.86 ± 1.98 | 20.9 |
| P13987 | CD59 | CD59 glycoprotein | 0.38 ± 0.7 | 29.1 |
| P20702 | ITGAX | Integrin alpha-X | 0.31 ± 0.68 | 20.5 |
| P08174 | CD55 | Complement decay-accelerating factor | 0.17 ± 0.48 | 13.6 |
| P04003 | C4BPA | C4b-binding protein alpha chain | 0.12 ± 0.64 | 6.6 |
| Q7Z408 | CSMD2 | CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 2 | 0.08 ± 0.3 | 6.6 |
| P05107 | ITGB2 | Integrin beta-2 | 0.07 ± 0.3 | 6.2 |
| Q7Z407 | CSMD3 | CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 3 | ND | ND |
| Q96PZ7 | CSMD1 | CUB and sushi domain-containing protein 1 | ND | ND |
| P11215 | ITGAM | Integrin alpha-M | ND | ND |
| Q9BXR6 | CFHR5 | Complement factor H-related protein 5 | ND | ND |
| P17927 | CR1 | Complement receptor type 1 | ND | ND |
| Q9NPY3 | CD93 | Complement component C1q receptor | ND | ND |
| Q16581 | C3AR1 | C3a anaphylatoxin chemotactic receptor | ND | ND |
| P20023 | CR2 | Complement receptor type 2 | ND | ND |
| P15529 | CD46 | Membrane cofactor protein | ND | ND |
| Q9Y279 | VSIG4 | V-set and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein 4 | ND | ND |
| P20851 | C4BPB | C4b-binding protein beta chain | ND | ND |
| Q92496 | CFHR4 | Complement factor H-related protein 4 | ND | ND |
| Q02985 | CFHR3 | Complement factor H-related protein 3 | ND | ND |
| P08246 | ELANE | Neutrophil elastase | ND | ND |
| P21730 | C5AR1 | Complement C5a receptor 1 | ND | ND |
ND: not detected; PSM: peptide spectrum match.
3.2. Alterations in Aqueous Humor Complement Proteins Associated with POAG
The specific changes in complement proteins within the aqueous humor of POAG patients were examined (Figure 2; Table 3). The fold change (FC) values indicate the alterations in protein levels observed in the POAG group (n = 62) compared to the cataract group (n = 196). The results revealed decreased levels of complement component C8 gamma chain (C8G) (FC = 0.83, p = 0.026), complement C6 (FC = 0.81, p = 0.032), and complement factor H (CFH) (FC = 0.77, p = 0.024) in POAG subjects relative to those with cataracts. Conversely, the expression of prothrombin (F2) (FC = 1.19, p = 0.046) was significantly higher in the POAG group compared to the cataract cohort.
Figure 2.
Alterations in the aqueous humor complement proteins associated with glaucoma. Fold change values were compared across groups (POAG vs. cataracts). A total of four proteins (C6, C8G, CFH, and F2) displayed significant alterations in protein levels. * p < 0.05.
Table 3.
Race-specific changes in the aqueous humor complement proteins in glaucoma patients.
| Gene Symbol | Description | Overall | African American | Caucasian | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC | p-Value | FC | p-Value | FC | p-Value | ||
| C4A | Complement C4-A | 1.44 | 0.210 | 2.33 | 0.027 * | 0.72 | 0.452 |
| C4B | Complement C4B | 1.30 | 0.074 | 1.69 | 0.015 * | 0.89 | 0.517 |
| F2 | Prothrombin | 1.19 | 0.046 * | 1.31 | 0.023 * | 1.03 | 0.811 |
| C7 | Complement component C7 | 1.06 | 0.576 | 1.38 | 0.025 * | 0.72 | 0.057 |
| C3 | Complement C3 | 1.03 | 0.607 | 1.21 | 0.027 * | 0.82 | 0.038 * |
| SERPING1 | Plasma protease C1 inhibitor | 1.00 | 0.946 | 1.13 | 0.114 | 0.83 | 0.015 * |
| CFI | Complement factor I | 0.93 | 0.261 | 1.06 | 0.490 | 0.77 | 0.007 * |
| CLU | Clusterin | 0.93 | 0.325 | 1.05 | 0.626 | 0.77 | 0.021 * |
| CFHR1 | Complement factor H-related protein 1 | 0.85 | 0.273 | 1.25 | 0.257 | 0.48 | 0.002 * |
| C8G | Complement component C8 gamma chain | 0.83 | 0.026 * | 0.94 | 0.600 | 0.67 | 0.004 * |
| C6 | Complement component C6 | 0.81 | 0.032 * | 0.95 | 0.716 | 0.63 | 0.002 * |
| CFH | Complement factor H | 0.77 | 0.024 * | 0.95 | 0.702 | 0.57 | 0.003 * |
FC: fold change in glaucoma patients compared to cataract patients; * p < 0.05.
3.3. Race-Specific Alterations in Aqueous Humor Complement Proteins Associated with POAG
After stratifying the samples based on race, eleven complement proteins exhibited significant alterations in POAG patients compared to cataract subjects (Figure 3; Table 3). In African Americans with POAG, five complement proteins were significantly elevated in the AH samples compared to those with cataracts: C4A (FC = 2.33, p = 0.027), C4B (FC = 1.69, p = 0.015), complement component C7 (FC = 1.38, p = 0.025), F2 (FC = 1.31, p = 0.023), and C3 (FC = 1.21, p = 0.027). No proteins were found significantly decreased in African American AH samples with POAG compared to cataracts.
Figure 3.
Race-specific alterations in the aqueous humor complement proteins associated with glaucoma. Patient samples were stratified according to race and compared across the two disease cohorts. Five proteins were found significantly altered within African Americans and eight within white subjects between the POAG and cataract cohorts. AA = Black/African American subjects; * p < 0.05.
In the Caucasian cohort, eight complement proteins were found to be significantly lower in the POAG group compared to cataract subjects: C3 (FC = 0.82, p = 0.038), plasma protease C1 inhibitor (SERPING1) (FC = 0.83, p = 0.015), complement factor I (CFI) (FC = 0.77, p = 0.007), CLU (FC = 0.77, p = 0.021), complement factor H-related protein 1 (CFHR1) (FC = 0.48, p = 0.002), C8G (FC = 0.67, p = 0.004), C6 (FC = 0.63, p = 0.002), and CFH (FC = 0.57, p = 0.003). Interestingly, within the Caucasian cohort, no complement proteins were found to be elevated in glaucoma samples compared to cataracts. These race-specific differences in complement proteins between POAG and cataracts are shown in Figure 3.
3.4. Sex-Specific Alterations in the Aqueous Humor Complement Proteins Associated with POAG
After stratifying the samples by sex, we identified significant differences in six complement proteins between the two patient groups (Figure 4; Table 4). Among males, the POAG group exhibited significant decreases in three complement proteins compared to the cataract group: CLU (FC = 0.78, p = 0.046), C6 (FC = 0.67, p = 0.009), and CFH (FC = 0.63, p = 0.015). Conversely, no significant increases in complement proteins were observed in the POAG group relative to cataracts within the male cohort. In contrast, within the female samples, two complement proteins showed significant upregulation in the POAG group compared to cataracts: C4B (FC = 1.56, p = 0.030) and F2 (FC = 1.37, p = 0.007). Additionally, C8G (FC = 0.78, p = 0.025) exhibited downregulation in the POAG group compared to cataracts (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Sex-specific alterations in the aqueous humor complement proteins associated with glaucoma. Patient samples were stratified according to sex and compared across the two disease cohorts. Three proteins were found significantly altered within males and three within females between the POAG and cataract subjects. * p < 0.05.
Table 4.
Sex-specific changes in the aqueous humor complement proteins in glaucoma patients.
| Gene Symbol | Description | Overall | Male | Female | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC | p-Value | FC | p-Value | FC | p-Value | ||
| C4B | Complement C4B | 1.30 | 0.074 | 0.96 | 0.853 | 1.56 | 0.030 * |
| F2 | Prothrombin | 1.19 | 0.046 * | 0.94 | 0.630 | 1.37 | 0.007 * |
| CLU | Clusterin | 0.93 | 0.325 | 0.78 | 0.046 * | 1.03 | 0.781 |
| C8G | Complement component C8 gamma chain | 0.83 | 0.026 * | 0.88 | 0.388 | 0.78 | 0.025 * |
| C6 | Complement component C6 | 0.81 | 0.032 * | 0.67 | 0.009 * | 0.92 | 0.519 |
| CFH | Complement factor H | 0.77 | 0.024 * | 0.63 | 0.015 * | 0.87 | 0.339 |
FC: fold change in glaucoma patients compared to cataract patients; * p < 0.05.
3.5. Alterations in Complement Proteins Correlated with Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD) and Visual Field Index (VFI)
Two glaucoma metrics, PSD and VFI, have been correlated with disease severity. To determine if any complement proteins within the AH were associated with these metrics, a correlation analysis was conducted within the POAG cohort (Table 5). The majority of the correlation coefficients (R) did not exceed the absolute value of 0.5, indicating that the correlations, whether positive or negative, were not strong (|R| > 0.5) [29]. Seven complement proteins demonstrated a significant, positive correlation with PSD, with |R| values ranging from 0.33 to 0.47. These proteins include C5 (R = 0.47, p = 0.002), C7 (R = 0.43, p = 0.006), complement C1R (R = 0.39, p = 0.014), C4B (R = 0.38, p = 0.019), complement component C8 alpha chain (C8A) (R = 0.37, p = 0.020), F2 (R = 0.36, p = 0.024), and C4A (R = 0.33, p = 0.038). For the VFI, seven complement proteins including C7 (R = −0.64, p = 0.0006), C8G (R = −0.54, p = 0.006), C1R (R = −0.52, p = 0.008), F2 (R = −0.49, p = 0.014), C4B (R = −0.46, p = 0.020), C4A (R = −0.44, p = 0.027), and C9 (R = −0.44, p = 0.027) demonstrated a significant negative correlation.
Table 5.
The complement proteins correlated with PSD and VFI values.
| Gene Symbol | Description | PSD Glaucoma | VFI Glaucoma | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation Coefficient (R) | p-Value | Correlation Coefficient (R) | p-Value | ||
| C5 | Complement C5 | 0.47 | 0.002 * | −0.31 | 0.125 |
| C7 | Complement component C7 | 0.43 | 0.006 * | −0.64 | 0.0006 * |
| C1R | Complement C1r subcomponent | 0.39 | 0.014 * | −0.52 | 0.008 * |
| C4B | Complement C4B | 0.38 | 0.019 * | −0.46 | 0.020 * |
| C8A | Complement component C8 alpha chain | 0.37 | 0.020 * | −0.29 | 0.162 |
| F2 | Prothrombin | 0.36 | 0.024 * | −0.49 | 0.014 * |
| C4A | Complement C4-A | 0.33 | 0.038 * | −0.44 | 0.027 * |
| C9 | Complement component C9 | 0.30 | 0.063 | −0.44 | 0.027 * |
| C8G | Complement component C8 gamma chain | 0.24 | 0.143 | −0.54 | 0.006 * |
PSD: pattern standard deviation; VFI: visual field index; * p < 0.05.
3.6. Complement Proteins Correlated with Ocular Stereometric Heidelberg Retinal Tomography (HRT) Parameters
Complement proteins were examined in relation to ocular stereometric HRT parameters. Moderate correlations (0.5 > |R| ≥ 0.3) and weak correlations (0.30 > |R| ≥ 0.20) were observed between several complement proteins and specific stereometric patterns, including cup area, cup volume, cup depth, disc area, and cup-to-disc (CD) ratio (Table 6). Specifically, six complement proteins (CFI, VTN, CLU, C3, CFH, and CFHR1) exhibited negative correlations with cup area. The |R| values for these proteins ranged from 0.17 to 0.33. For cup volume, nine complement proteins (CFI, VTN, C3, CLU, CFH, CFHR1, C4B, C2, and F2) demonstrated negative correlations, with |R| values ranging from 0.16 to 0.33. Regarding maximum cup depth, eight complement proteins (CFI, VTN, C3, CFH, F2, CFHR1, C5, and C8B) were found to be negatively correlated, with |R| values ranging from 0.17 to 0.27. Mean cup depth found four proteins (CFI, CFH, C3, and CFHR1) with significant correction. Of these, all displayed negative R values, with |R| values varying from 0.17 to 0.23. For the disc area, four complement proteins (CFI, VTN, CFHR1, and C3) demonstrated a negative correlation with the metric, and |R| values ranged from 0.17 to 0.19. Furthermore, six complement proteins (CFI, CLU, CFH, VTN, C3, and CFHR1) exhibited a negative correlation with CD area ratio, with |R| values varying from 0.16 to 0.28.
Table 6.
The complement proteins correlated with HRT parameters.
| Gene Symbol | Cup Area (mm2) | Cup Volume (mm3) | Maximum Cup Depth (mm) | Mean Cup Depth (mm) | Disc Area (mm2) | CD Area Ratio | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corr. Coeff. (R) | p-Value | Corr. Coeff. (R) | p-Value | Corr. Coeff. (R) | p-Value | Corr. Coeff. (R) | p-Value | Corr. Coeff. (R) | p-Value | Corr. Coeff. (R) | p-Value | |
| CFI | −0.33 | 6 × 10−5 * | −0.33 | 5 × 10−5 * | −0.27 | 0.001 * | −0.23 | 0.005 * | −0.19 | 0.020 * | −0.28 | 0.0004 * |
| VTN | −0.26 | 0.001 * | −0.29 | 0.0005 * | −0.22 | 0.009 * | −0.15 | 0.061 | −0.19 | 0.021 * | −0.19 | 0.022 * |
| CLU | −0.26 | 0.002 * | −0.25 | 0.002 * | −0.15 | 0.066 | −0.13 | 0.121 | −0.09 | 0.291 | −0.21 | 0.010 * |
| C3 | −0.22 | 0.007 * | −0.26 | 0.002 * | −0.22 | 0.007 * | −0.19 | 0.022 * | −0.17 | 0.045 * | −0.19 | 0.022 * |
| CFH | −0.20 | 0.015 * | −0.23 | 0.005 * | −0.22 | 0.008 * | −0.20 | 0.014 * | −0.14 | 0.105 | −0.21 | 0.009 * |
| CFHR1 | −0.17 | 0.036 * | −0.20 | 0.018 * | −0.18 | 0.030 * | −0.17 | 0.032 * | −0.18 | 0.034 * | −0.16 | 0.049 * |
| C4B | −0.15 | 0.074 | −0.19 | 0.023 * | −0.15 | 0.074 | −0.15 | 0.062 | −0.09 | 0.307 | −0.12 | 0.143 |
| C2 | −0.15 | 0.065 | −0.16 | 0.049 * | −0.13 | 0.116 | −0.13 | 0.116 | −0.11 | 0.188 | −0.12 | 0.146 |
| F2 | −0.14 | 0.093 | −0.18 | 0.034 * | −0.20 | 0.015 * | −0.16 | 0.054 | −0.08 | 0.358 | −0.10 | 0.213 |
| C5 | −0.08 | 0.358 | −0.11 | 0.194 | −0.17 | 0.038 * | −0.13 | 0.102 | −0.14 | 0.083 | −0.05 | 0.533 |
| C8B | −0.08 | 0.360 | −0.11 | 0.171 | −0.17 | 0.044 * | −0.13 | 0.111 | −0.07 | 0.395 | −0.05 | 0.504 |
HRT: Heidelberg Retinal Tomography; CD: cup-to-disc; * p < 0.05.
4. Discussion
Complement proteins play a critical role in immune responses and inflammatory processes, with their dysregulation being linked to various ocular disorders, including glaucoma. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the complement proteins present in the human AH. In addition, we explored the relationship between AH complement protein profiles and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was utilized to both identify and quantify complement proteins in the AH samples collected from both POAG and cataract patients.
The findings reveal significant changes in complement proteins among POAG patients compared to those with cataracts. Furthermore, these alterations exhibit variations based on race and sex. Gaining insight into complement protein profiles in the AH will assist us in the development of targeted therapies to effectively modulate the complement system for treating ocular disorders and establish novel biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring disease progression.
We successfully identified a total of 32 complement proteins within the AH samples collected from 62 POAG and 196 cataract patients. Twenty-two were notably abundant, appearing in more than 50% of the AH samples and corroborating previous findings [30,31]. Proteomic analysis revealed significant downregulation of three complement proteins, including C6, C8G, and CFH, while one protein, F2, was upregulated in POAG subjects compared to cataract controls.
Complement proteins trigger the formation of the terminal membrane attack complex, (MAC), which plays a crucial role in targeting pathogens and regulating immune responses [32,33]. The downregulation of C6 in the AH from POAG subjects is intriguing, as past reports have found upregulated MAC components, such as C6, in human and mouse glaucomatous retinas [34]. Lower C6 levels may be the body’s attempt to regulate or compensate for increased oxidative stress, apoptosis, or dysregulation in immune responses. Moreover, upon binding to the α-chain of C5b, C6 gains the capacity to interact with cell membranes [35]. The greater activation of the complement cascades in POAG patients might lead to the conversation of C6 and subsequent association to target cell membranes, resulting in reduced levels within the measured AH. Alternatively, recent studies highlighting independent complement gene transcription and protein synthesis within retinal cells offer an alternative approach for decreased AH C6 levels [36,37,38]. The elevated cell death in the retinal cells of POAG patients could contribute to a decrease in C6 levels in the surrounding environment. Nevertheless, investigating the origins of complement proteins within the AH and their correlation to retinal protein profiles could provide further insight.
Another component of the MAC, C8G [39], was found significantly downregulated in AH from POAG subjects compared to cataracts. Though the role of C8G outside of MAC formation is limited, one study found C8 subunit deficiency associated with recurrent Neisserial bacterial infections in humans [40]. Also, recent studies have shown the neuroprotective effects of C8G and its anti-inflammatory properties within the brain, where the upregulation of C8G acts as an antagonist of microglial S1PR2, resulting in the attenuation of neuroinflammation in mice models [41,42,43]. A decrease in C8G levels in the AH of POAG subjects could signal impairment in anti-inflammatory pathways and increased risk for infection compared to non-glaucoma individuals.
As an essential regulator, CFH indirectly inhibits complement pathway elements like C3b, C3 convertase, and subsequently, MAC formation [44,45]. Prior studies have reported the downregulation of CFH in retinas from glaucomatous patients and mice exposed to oxidative stress [34,46,47]. The observed reduction in CFH levels in the retina of glaucoma patients aligns with our findings and may suggest a potential AH biomarker for elevated oxidative stress and POAG. However, it is notable that decreased CFH levels in the AH of the POAG patients coincide with a decreased MAC component, C6. As CFH mainly inhibits the alternative pathway [48], a corresponding decrease in C6 may signal downstream pathway dysfunction or other active mechanisms hindering C6 accumulation. This may also suggest a non-MAC-associated role for CFH in POAG. However, further studies on the regulatory influence of CFH on MAC regulation and POAG in the AH are needed.
In our study, we also found elevated prothrombin (F2) in POAG aqueous humor samples. It is primarily recognized for its role in the coagulation cascade [49]. The pathogenesis of glaucoma involves vascular dysregulation and the associated oxidative stress [43,50]. Changes in the coagulation system, including increased F2 levels, could contribute to microvascular abnormalities or blood flow changes in the optic nerve head and retina that may ultimately contribute to retinal cell damage in POAG patients. Consistent with our findings of elevated F2 levels in the AH samples, another study reported an increase in F2 concentrations in the venous blood of POAG patients when compared to the controls and normal pressure glaucoma patients [51], which might suggest a potential involvement of F2 in the pathophysiology of POAG.
Interestingly, complement C3 was the highest detected protein in our AH samples. Furthermore, C3 levels increased 1.21-fold in African American POAG patients compared to those with cataracts, whereas decreased levels were detected in Caucasians with POAG, suggesting that there is perhaps a race-dependent role of the alternative complement pathway in glaucoma. Several studies have consistently reported a higher prevalence of glaucoma within the African American population, although the specific factors contributing to this disparity remain unclear [52]. Upregulated C3 levels in the AH of African Americans could be one of the factors posing higher risks for glaucoma severity, with subsequent complement cascade activation triggering the proteolytic cleavage of C3 into C3a and C4b. C3a and C5a are anaphylatoxins that have been linked to glaucoma pathogenesis [53,54,55] and the progression of other ocular diseases, like AMD [56]. As potential inflammatory mediators, these molecules can target a broad range of immune and non-immune cells, causing an increase in the permeability of small blood vessels, oxidative bursts, and the release of histamine [57]. Controlling the regulation of these molecules offers the potential to reduce the severity of glaucoma, and anti-C3a and anti-C5a drugs are currently in clinical trials as treatment options for late-stage AMD [58].
Furthermore, the findings from our study indicate that four additional complement proteins, C4A, C4B, F2, and C7, were significantly elevated in the African American population with glaucoma compared to those with cataracts. However, eight proteins (C6, C8G, CFH, C3, CFHR1, CFI, CLU, and SERPING1) were significantly downregulated in Caucasian glaucoma subjects. These findings indicate race-specific differences in complement protein profiles associated with glaucoma, suggesting potential variations in the underlying pathogenesis and immune response between the two racial groups. Cleavage of C4 into C4A and C4B is known to generate classical pathway C3 convertase [59,60], an enzyme that cleaves C3 into C3A and C3B, leading to a potential elevation in pro-inflammatory pathways. The increased levels of AH C4A and C4B in African American POAG subjects compared to those with cataracts emphasize the potential involvement of the complement cascade in the accelerated onset and progression of glaucoma within this demographic group.
Within the Caucasian cohort, several regulatory proteins, specifically CFI and CLU, were also downregulated in POAG. CFI is a serine protease that inhibits the complement pathways through the degradation of activated complement proteins C3A and C4B [61]. CLU has been investigated for its potential neuroprotective effects [62] and acts as an extracellular molecular chaperone [63,64], where it can capture and clear soluble precursors to the membrane attack complex. With its involvement in the removal of potentially toxic protein oligomers, downregulation in POAG patients compared to the controls may contribute to the buildup of inflammatory molecules within the ocular environment.
Further, in our study, we found sex-specific differences, with the levels of CLU, C6, and CFH proteins significantly decreased in males with POAG compared to the controls. As an inhibitor of MAC formation, reduced CLU in males could render retinal neurons more vulnerable to complement-mediated inflammation and cell damage. Further, decreased levels of CFH might suggest a compromised regulatory control over the alternative complement pathway. Complement proteins C4B and F2 increased while C8G decreased in the AH of female POAG subjects. Increased C4B levels may signify heightened activation of the classical and lectin pathways of the complement system, while increased F2 in the AH may hint at broader implications in the vasculature of the eye [65]. A previous study has shown that inhibition of the classical pathway of the complement cascade prevents early dendritic and synaptic degeneration in mouse and rat models of glaucoma [66].
While these findings expand our understandings of complement proteins in the AH and their relation to POAG, it should be noted that there were several limitations to our study. We were unable to compare African American males/females to Caucasian males/females with POAG and cataracts due to limited statistical power. Another limitation is the potential influence of anti-glaucoma therapy on the AH complement profile. Given that certain anti-glaucoma treatments have been reported to induce alterations in the dynamics of AH production [67], there is potential for these therapies to influence the abundance and activity of complement proteins within the ocular environment. However, since most patients undergoing glaucoma surgery are already receiving anti-glaucoma therapy, the absence of a substantial treatment-naïve cohort constrained our statistical power. Therefore, a detailed examination focused on the interplay between anti-glaucoma therapies and complement protein expression within the AH is necessary for a more complete understanding. Furthermore, while alterations in the complement composition of the AH may be associated with POAG, more studies of the optical nerve and retinal tissues in relation to the AH are needed to better understand the molecular mechanisms regulating POAG.
5. Conclusions
In summary, this study uses modern LC-MS/MS analyses to advance our current knowledge of aqueous humor-associated complement proteins in relation to POAG. Our results provide insights into the relation between AH’s complement profile and its differential expression within race, sex, and glaucoma subgroups. Further investigations are needed to unveil the precise contribution of the complement system to glaucoma disease pathology and its impact on ocular susceptibility. Future research incorporating complement proteins in ocular diseases will help advance personalized treatment strategies, ultimately improving glaucoma management and therapies.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to Kapil Bharti, Director of the National Eye Institute (NEI) Intramural Research Program, for his insightful comments and thorough edits.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jpm13091400/s1, Supplementary File S1: Patient sample information and associated phenotypic data. Supplementary File S2: Normalized protein levels.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.V., S.W.M., A.S. and S.S.; methodology, G.J. and W.Z.; software, T.J.L.; formal analysis, T.J.L.; investigation, J.A., G.J., K.E.B., M.T.-H., L.U. and A.J.E.; resources, K.E.B., L.U., M.T.-H., A.J.E., S.S. and A.S.; data curation, J.A., G.J. and T.J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.V. and S.W.M.; writing—review and editing, J.A., G.J., M.T.-H. and S.S.; visualization, A.V., S.W.M. and J.A.; supervision, A.S.; project administration, A.S.; funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Augusta University (IRB Project ID No. 611480; approval date: 19 April 2019).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.
Data Availability Statement
All raw data are available in the Supplementary Materials.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Eye Institute (Bethesda, MD, USA) grant No. R01 EY029728, awarded to Ashok Sharma, and grant No. P30 EY031631, the Center Core Grant for Vision Research.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Benhar I., London A., Schwartz M. The privileged immunity of immune privileged organs: The case of the eye. Front. Immunol. 2012;3:296. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Streilein J.W. Ocular immune privilege: Therapeutic opportunities from an experiment of nature. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003;3:879–889. doi: 10.1038/nri1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McDermott A.M. Antimicrobial compounds in tears. Exp. Eye Res. 2013;117:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Paiva C.S., Leger A.J.S., Caspi R.R. Mucosal immunology of the ocular surface. Mucosal Immunol. 2022;15:1143–1157. doi: 10.1038/s41385-022-00551-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Crane I.J., Liversidge J. Seminars in Immunopathology. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2008. Mechanisms of leukocyte migration across the blood–retina barrier; pp. 165–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen M., Luo C., Zhao J., Devarajan G., Xu H. Immune regulation in the aging retina. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2019;69:159–172. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Freddo T.F. A contemporary concept of the blood–aqueous barrier. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2013;32:181–195. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Katamay R., Nussenblatt R.B. Blood–retinal barrier, immune privilege, and autoimmunity. Retina. 2013:579–589. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Keino H., Horie S., Sugita S. Immune privilege and eye-derived T-regulatory cells. J. Immunol. Res. 2018;2018:1679197. doi: 10.1155/2018/1679197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Taylor A.W. Ocular immunosuppressive microenvironment. Immune Response Eye. 2007;92:71–85. doi: 10.1159/000099255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sonoda K.H., Sakamoto T., Qiao H., Hisatomi T., Oshima T., Tsutsumi-Miyahara C., Exley M., Balk S.P., Taniguchi M., Ishibashi T. The analysis of systemic tolerance elicited by antigen inoculation into the vitreous cavity: Vitreous cavity-associated immune deviation. Immunology. 2005;116:390–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02239.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Williams P.A., Braine C.E., Kizhatil K., Foxworth N.E., Tolman N.G., Harder J.M., Scott R.A., Sousa G.L., Panitch A., Howell G.R. Inhibition of monocyte-like cell extravasation protects from neurodegeneration in DBA/2J glaucoma. Mol. Neurodegener. 2019;14:6. doi: 10.1186/s13024-018-0303-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mangan B.G., Al-Yahya K., Chen C.T., Gionfriddo J.R., Powell C.C., Dubielzig R.R., Ehrhart E.J., Madl J.E. Retinal pigment epithelial damage, breakdown of the blood–retinal barrier, and retinal inflammation in dogs with primary glaucoma. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2007;10:117–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2007.00585.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Duh E.J., Sun J.K., Stitt A.W. Diabetic retinopathy: Current understanding, mechanisms, and treatment strategies. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e93751. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.93751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang W., Lo A.C. Diabetic retinopathy: Pathophysiology and treatments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1816. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Klaassen I., Van Noorden C.J., Schlingemann R.O. Molecular basis of the inner blood-retinal barrier and its breakdown in diabetic macular edema and other pathological conditions. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2013;34:19–48. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kodeboyina S.K., Lee T.J., Churchwell L., Ulrich L., Bollinger K., Bogorad D., Estes A., Zhi W., Sharma S., Sharma A. The Constitutive Proteome of Human Aqueous Humor and Race Specific Alterations. Proteomes. 2020;8:34. doi: 10.3390/proteomes8040034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Altay L., Sitnilska V., Schick T., Widmer G., Duchateau-Nguyen G., Piraino P., Jayagopal A., Drawnel F., Fauser S. Early local activation of complement in aqueous humour of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Eye. 2019;33:1859–1864. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0501-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Janeway C.A., Jr., Travers P., Walport M., Shlomchik M.J. Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease. 5th ed. Garland Science; New York, NY, USA: 2001. The complement system and innate immunity. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bora N.S., Jha P., Bora P.S. Seminars in Immunopathology. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2008. The role of complement in ocular pathology; pp. 85–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Keir L.S., Firth R., Aponik L., Feitelberg D., Sakimoto S., Aguilar E., Welsh G.I., Richards A., Usui Y., Satchell S.C., et al. VEGF regulates local inhibitory complement proteins in the eye and kidney. J. Clin. Investig. 2017;127:199–214. doi: 10.1172/JCI86418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Botling Taube A., Konzer A., Alm A., Bergquist J. Proteomic analysis of the aqueous humour in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019;103:1190–1194. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yu M., Xie F., Liu X., Sun H., Guo Z., Liu X., Li W., Sun W., Wang Y., He C. Proteomic Study of Aqueous Humor and Its Application in the Treatment of Neovascular Glaucoma. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020;7:587677. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.587677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schick T., Steinhauer M., Aslanidis A., Altay L., Karlstetter M., Langmann T., Kirschfink M., Fauser S. Local complement activation in aqueous humor in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Eye. 2017;31:810–813. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Howell G.R., Macalinao D.G., Sousa G.L., Walden M., Soto I., Kneeland S.C., Barbay J.M., King B.L., Marchant J.K., Hibbs M. Molecular clustering identifies complement and endothelin induction as early events in a mouse model of glaucoma. J. Clin. Investig. 2011;121:1429–1444. doi: 10.1172/JCI44646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gassel C.J., Reinehr S., Gomes S.C., Dick H.B., Joachim S.C. Preservation of optic nerve structure by complement inhibition in experimental glaucoma. Cell Tissue Res. 2020;382:293–306. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03240-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Salgarello T., Colotto A., Falsini B., Buzzonetti L., Cesari L., Iarossi G., Scullica L. Correlation of pattern electroretinogram with optic disc cup shape in ocular hypertension. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999;40:1989–1997. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Eyre T.A., Ducluzeau F., Sneddon T.P., Povey S., Bruford E.A., Lush M.J. The HUGO gene nomenclature database, 2006 updates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D319–D321. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk. J. Emerg. Med. 2018;18:91–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chowdhury U.R., Madden B.J., Charlesworth M.C., Fautsch M.P. Proteome analysis of human aqueous humor. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51:4921–4931. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Adav S.S., Wei J., Terence Y., Ang B.C., Yip L.W., Sze S.K. Proteomic analysis of aqueous humor from primary open angle glaucoma patients on drug treatment revealed altered complement activation cascade. J. Proteome Res. 2018;17:2499–2510. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aleshin A.E., Schraufstatter I.U., Stec B., Bankston L.A., Liddington R.C., DiScipio R.G. Structure of Complement C6 Suggests a Mechanism for Initiation and Unidirectional, Sequential Assembly of Membrane Attack Complex (MAC)*♦. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:10210–10222. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.327809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bubeck D. The making of a macromolecular machine: Assembly of the membrane attack complex. Biochemistry. 2014;53:1908–1915. doi: 10.1021/bi500157z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tezel G., Yang X., Luo C., Kain A.D., Powell D.W., Kuehn M.H., Kaplan H.J. Oxidative stress and the regulation of complement activation in human glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51:5071–5082. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tegla C.A., Cudrici C., Patel S., Trippe R., Rus V., Niculescu F., Rus H. Membrane attack by complement: The assembly and biology of terminal complement complexes. Immunol. Res. 2011;51:45–60. doi: 10.1007/s12026-011-8239-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Luo C., Zhao J., Madden A., Chen M., Xu H. Complement expression in retinal pigment epithelial cells is modulated by activated macrophages. Exp. Eye Res. 2013;112:93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pauly D., Agarwal D., Dana N., Schäfer N., Biber J., Wunderlich K.A., Jabri Y., Straub T., Zhang N.R., Gautam A.K. Cell-type-specific complement expression in the healthy and diseased retina. Cell Rep. 2019;29:2835–2848.e2834. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xu H., Chen M. Targeting the complement system for the management of retinal inflammatory and degenerative diseases. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016;787:94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Serna M., Giles J.L., Morgan B.P., Bubeck D. Structural basis of complement membrane attack complex formation. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:10587. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kojima T., Horiuchi T., Nishizaka H., Fukumori Y., Amano T., Nagasawa K., Niho Y., Hayashi K. Genetic basis of human complement C8α-γ deficiency. J. Immunol. 1998;161:3762–3766. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.161.7.3762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kim J.-H., Afridi R., Han J., Jung H.-G., Kim S.-C., Hwang E.M., Shim H.S., Ryu H., Choe Y., Hoe H.-S. Gamma subunit of complement component 8 is a neuroinflammation inhibitor. Brain. 2021;144:528–552. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim J.-H., Han J., Suk K. Protective effects of complement component 8 gamma against blood-brain barrier breakdown. Front. Physiol. 2021;12:671250. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.671250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Suk K. Gamma subunit of complement component 8 is an innate immune suppressor in brain. J. Immunol. 2020;204:144-14. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.204.Supp.144.14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Heinen S., Hartmann A., Lauer N., Wiehl U., Dahse H.M., Schirmer S., Gropp K., Enghardt T., Wallich R., Hälbich S., et al. Factor H-related protein 1 (CFHR-1) inhibits complement C5 convertase activity and terminal complex formation. Blood. 2009;114:2439–2447. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-02-205641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.De Córdoba S.R., De Jorge E.G. Translational mini-review series on complement factor H: Genetics and disease associations of human complement factor H. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2008;151:1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03552.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Borras C., Canonica J., Jorieux S., Abache T., El Sanharawi M., Klein C., Delaunay K., Jonet L., Salvodelli M., Naud M.-C. CFH exerts anti-oxidant effects on retinal pigment epithelial cells independently from protecting against membrane attack complex. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:13873. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50420-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Weismann D., Hartvigsen K., Lauer N., Bennett K.L., Scholl H.P., Issa P.C., Cano M., Brandstätter H., Tsimikas S., Skerka C. Complement factor H binds malondialdehyde epitopes and protects from oxidative stress. Nature. 2011;478:76–81. doi: 10.1038/nature10449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kopp A., Hebecker M., Svobodová E., Józsi M. Factor h: A complement regulator in health and disease, and a mediator of cellular interactions. Biomolecules. 2012;2:46–75. doi: 10.3390/biom2010046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chinnaraj M., Planer W., Pozzi N. Structure of coagulation factor II: Molecular mechanism of thrombin generation and development of next-generation anticoagulants. Front. Med. 2018;5:281. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Grieshaber M.C., Mozaffarieh M., Flammer J. What is the link between vascular dysregulation and glaucoma? Surv. Ophthalmol. 2007;52:S144–S154. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.O’Brien C., Butt Z., Ludlam C., Detkova P. Activation of the coagulation cascade in untreated primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:725–730. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30245-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Siegfried C.J., Shui Y.B. Racial Disparities in Glaucoma: From Epidemiology to Pathophysiology. Mo Med. 2022;119:49–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Harboe M., Mollnes T.E. The alternative complement pathway revisited. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2008;12:1074–1084. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00350.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Harder J.M., Williams P.A., Braine C.E., Yang H.S., Thomas J.M., Foxworth N.E., John S.W., Howell G.R. Complement peptide C3a receptor 1 promotes optic nerve degeneration in DBA/2J mice. J. Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:336. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-02011-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Howell G.R., Soto I., Ryan M., Graham L.C., Smith R.S., John S.W. Deficiency of complement component 5 ameliorates glaucoma in DBA/2J mice. J. Neuroinflammation. 2013;10:851. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sharma R., George A., Nimmagadda M., Ortolan D., Karla B.-S., Qureshy Z., Bose D., Dejene R., Liang G., Wan Q. Epithelial phenotype restoring drugs suppress macular degeneration phenotypes in an iPSC model. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:7293. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27488-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Klos A., Tenner A.J., Johswich K.-O., Ager R.R., Reis E.S., Köhl J. The role of the anaphylatoxins in health and disease. Mol. Immunol. 2009;46:2753–2766. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.04.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Qin S., Dong N., Yang M., Wang J., Feng X., Wang Y. Complement inhibitors in age-related macular degeneration: A potential therapeutic option. J. Immunol. Res. 2021;2021:9945725. doi: 10.1155/2021/9945725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Girardi G., Lingo J.J., Fleming S.D., Regal J.F. Essential role of complement in pregnancy: From implantation to parturition and beyond. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:1681. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang H., Liu M. Complement C4, infections, and autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:694928. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.694928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nilsson S.C., Sim R.B., Lea S.M., Fremeaux-Bacchi V., Blom A.M. Complement factor I in health and disease. Mol. Immunol. 2011;48:1611–1620. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Giannakopoulos P., Kövari E., French L., Viard I., Hof P., Bouras C. Possible neuroprotective role of clusterin in Alzheimer’s disease: A quantitative immunocytochemical study. Acta Neuropathol. 1998;95:387–394. doi: 10.1007/s004010050815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wilson M.R., Easterbrook-Smith S.B. Clusterin is a secreted mammalian chaperone. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000;25:95–98. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01534-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Menny A., Lukassen M.V., Couves E.C., Franc V., Heck A.J., Bubeck D. Structural basis of soluble membrane attack complex packaging for clearance. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:6086. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26366-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Li S., Gao Y., Shao M., Tang B., Cao W., Sun X. Association between coagulation function and patients with primary angle closure glaucoma: A 5-year retrospective case-control study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Williams P.A., Tribble J.R., Pepper K.W., Cross S.D., Morgan B.P., Morgan J.E., John S.W., Howell G.R. Inhibition of the classical pathway of the complement cascade prevents early dendritic and synaptic degeneration in glaucoma. Mol. Neurodegener. 2016;11:26. doi: 10.1186/s13024-016-0091-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Dikopf M.S., Vajaranant T.S., Edward D.P. Topical treatment of glaucoma: Established and emerging pharmacology. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2017;18:885–898. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1328498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All raw data are available in the Supplementary Materials.




