Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1998 Nov;36(11):3352–3354. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.11.3352-3354.1998

Genetic Heterogeneity of Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato in Ixodes ricinus Ticks Collected in Belgium

Marie-Christine Misonne 1, Georges Van Impe 2, Philippe P Hoet 1,*
PMCID: PMC105328  PMID: 9774592

Abstract

Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.), the etiological agent of Lyme disease, is transmitted by the bite of Ixodes ricinus. Four hundred eighty-nine ticks, collected in four locations of a region of southern Belgium where Lyme disease is endemic, were examined for the presence of the spirochete. In a PCR test with primers that recognize a chromosomal gene of all strains, 23% of the ticks were found to be infected. The species B. burgdorferi s.l. comprises at least three pathogenic genomospecies, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (s.s.), Borrelia garinii, and Borrelia afzelii, which could be distinguished in PCR tests with species-specific primers that correspond to distinct plasmid sequences. B. garinii was most prevalent (53% of infected ticks), followed by B. burgdorferi s.s. (38%) and B. afzelii (9%). Of the infected ticks, 40% were infected with a single species, 40% were infected with two species, and 5% were infected with all three species. For 15% of the ticks, the infecting species could not be identified. No difference in rates of prevalence was observed among the four locations, which had similar ground covers, even though they belonged to distinct biogeographic regions. A greater heterogeneity of spirochetal DNA in ticks than in cultured reference DNA was suggested by a comparison of the results of PCRs with two different sets of species-specific primer sequences.


The etiological agent of Lyme borreliosis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.), is transmitted in Europe by the bite of Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) (6). B. burgdorferi s.l. organisms make up a heterogeneous group of spirochetes which has been divided into at least five genomospecies, three of which are pathogenic: B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (s.s.), Borrelia garinii, and Borrelia afzelii. Two recently discovered genomospecies, Borrelia japonica and Borrelia andersonii, have not been isolated from Lyme disease patients (10, 16). Differences in chromosomal and plasmid sequences and studies of outer membrane proteins led to this classification (3, 5, 7, 1215, 25, 26, 33, 35).

Lyme borreliosis exhibits a broad array of clinical manifestations: skin disorders (like erythema migrans and acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans), carditis, arthritis, and neurological symptoms. The patterns of disease in Europe and the United States appear to differ. Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans and neuroborreliosis are more common in Europe, whereas arthritis appears to be prevalent in the United States (32). The clinical outcome seems to depend on the infecting genomospecies. Lyme arthritis has been attributed to infection by B. burgdorferi s.s., neuroborreliosis has been attributed to B. garinii, and acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans has been attributed to B. afzelii (1, 2, 8, 34).

Information concerning the prevalence of Borrelia spirochetes in tick populations is an essential part of epidemiological surveys of Lyme disease in regions of endemicity. The identification of the different genomospecies in one particular region might help to anticipate the clinical outcomes of infected persons and to evaluate the potential of a given genomospecies to infect. In screening tests for the presence of spirochetes in the arthropod vector, targets used for the amplification by PCR of B. burgdorferi s.l. DNA range from chromosomal loci (a surface-exposed 66-kDa protein, flagellin, and 16S rRNA) to sequences carried by plasmids (8, 15, 18, 22, 25, 27).

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of each genomospecies of B. burgdorferi s.l. in Ixodes ricinus in a southern region of Belgium where Lyme disease is endemic and to evaluate the heterogeneity of strains in nature by the use of two different species-specific primer sets.

Prevalence of ticks in four geographic areas.

In 1996, during the month of July (which corresponds to the period of maximum activity of the tick), 489 I. ricinus ticks were collected by dragging a blanket over the vegetation on the ground in Matagne-la-Petite, close to Philippeville, Namur Province, Belgium (Table 1). Two hundred fourteen square meters (corresponding to 470 blanket sweeps) was examined for the presence of I. ricinus in each site. The four different geographic areas yielded similar numbers of ticks, amounting on average to 0.6 tick/m2 (no significant difference in numbers by the χ2 test; P > 0.3). The four prospected sites differ geologically and thus in their forest cover. It is well known that a main limiting factor of tick survival is the hygrometry of their microhabitat (11). A high humidity can be maintained within the vegetal litter covering the soil, provided it is sufficiently thick to buffer hygrometric variations. This was the case in each of prospected sites, so that significant differences in the numbers of ticks were actually unexpected.

TABLE 1.

Descriptions of the four prospected sites

Region of Belgium Site Locality UTMa coordinate Dominant trees Soil Subsoil
Condroz Bois de Bonne Fontaine Vodelée FR 235599 Fagus sylvatica (beech), Carpinus betulus (hornbeam) Leaf litter, ivy Sandstone
Fagne Bois des Fagnes Doische FR 245585 Quercus robur (oak), Carpinus betulus (hornbeam) Leaf litter, bramble Schist
Calestienne Bois de Matignolle Treignes FR 188513 Fagus sylvatica (beech) Leaf litter Calcareous rock
Ardenne Chêne à l’Image Vierves-sur-Viroin FR 172483 Quercus petraea (oak), Betula pendula (birch) Leaf litter, fern Siliceous rock
a

UTM, Universal Transverse Mercator (global coordinate system). 

Infection of ticks by different B. burgdorferi genomospecies.

Immediately after collection, the ticks were immersed in 70% ethanol and stored at 4°C until use. The ticks were dried and incubated in 100 μl of TE (10 mM Tris [pH 7.8], 1 mM EDTA) containing 200 μg of proteinase K per ml. After overnight incubation at room temperature, they were crushed with a pipette tip, boiled for 10 min, and then placed on ice for 10 min. The samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 × g, and the supernatants were collected and stored at −20°C. A 5-μl amount of each supernatant was added to the PCR buffer, and amplification was obtained and analyzed as described previously (18). All samples were first amplified in the presence of the c and c′ primers of Rosa et al. (30), which correspond to a highly conserved chromosomal gene supposedly present in all B. burgdorferi s.l. strains. Of a total of 489 ticks (444 nymphs and 45 adults) (Table 2), B. burgdorferi s.l. was detected in 23% of the ticks examined, and detection ranged from 20 to 26% at the various sites (no statistical difference; P > 0.6). At three sites, adult ticks appeared to be more infected than nymphs. Of 22 locations in the same Belgian province along the Meuse and Sambre valleys, 14 showed the presence of infected ticks (4), stressing the endemicity of Lyme disease in the southern part of Belgium.

TABLE 2.

Detection by PCR of genomic groups of B. burgdorferi s.l. in Ixodes ticks

Areaa Stageb Tick infection ratec
No. of ticks with spirochetes in genomic groupd:
No. of ticks tested No. positive (%) Ss Ga Af
Co N 97 18 (19) 14 14 0
A 8 3 (38) 1 3 0
 Subtotal 105 21 (20) 15 17 0
F N 116 32 (28) 16 22 4
A 12 0 (0)
 Subtotal 128 32 (25) 16 22 4
Ca N 109 24 (22) 11 17 6
A 23 10 (43) 9 10 2
 Subtotal 132 34 (26) 20 27 8
A N 122 25 (20) 5 13 2
A 2 2 (100) 0 0 0
 Subtotal 124 27 (22) 5 13 2
  Total 489 114 (23) 56 79 14
a

Co, Condroz; F, Fagne; Ca, Calestienne; A, Ardenne. 

b

N, nymph; A, adult. 

c

Infection rate determined by PCR with the primers of Rosa et al. (30). 

d

Genomic groups were determined by PCR with species-specific primers (18). Ss, B. burgdorferi s.s.; Ga, B. garinii; Af, B. afzelii

Positive samples were next amplified in the presence of species-specific primers, designed on the basis of sequences corresponding to different plasmids belonging to the three spirochete genomospecies (18). Inhibition of the DNA polymerase in PCR-negative tick extracts was tested by adding spirochetal DNA to the reaction mixture. As shown in Table 2, B. garinii was most abundant (53% of infected ticks), followed by B. burgdorferi s.s. (38%) and B. afzelii (9%). These proportions correspond to results obtained in other European countries (19, 21, 34, 36). In a previous study (8), the three genomospecies of B. burgdorferi s.l. were shown to infect Belgian patients in a proportion corresponding to what we now find in ticks. The three genomospecies seem to be equally distributed among the four sites (P > 0.3). This is at variance with observations made in Valais (Switzerland) and The Netherlands, where the proportions of the three genomic groups were not the same in different areas (19, 23).

Only one species of B. burgdorferi s.l. was found in 40% of infected ticks, whereas two species were found in 40% and all three species were found in 5% of the ticks (with species being undetermined in 15% of the infected ticks [see below]). Infection by a single genomospecies was prevalent in one region (Ardenne), whereas infection by multiple genomospecies prevailed in another region (Calestienne) (P < 0.01). Mixed infections were associated mainly with B. garinii and B. burgdorferi s.s. These results for ticks were in agreement with the results of others (9, 24, 28, 29) and are also reflected in the fact that the same proportion of mixed infections occurs in patients (8).

Of the 114 ticks that scored positive with the c and c′ primers, 17 (15%) showed no amplification product with any of the three recently developed plasmid species-specific primers (18). When we amplified the same tick extracts with previously described ospA-derived species-specific primers (8), the number of unassigned species among infected ticks rose to 51% (result not shown). This is not due to inhibition of DNA polymerase in tick extracts, since spiked samples gave amplification products. Both primer sets were species specific, since for samples that gave an amplification signal with the ospA primers, the genomospecies assignment confirmed the results reported in Table 2, which were obtained with the recently described plasmid primers (18).

In all biological fluids of patients diagnosed with the c and c′ primers, the genomic group could be identified with the ospA-derived primers (8). With the same primers in the present study, the genomospecies could not be assigned for 51% of infected ticks, whereas with different plasmid species-specific primers, the genomospecies could not be assigned for 15% (18). This may be due to the absence of plasmids or mutations in the primer binding sequences. In any case, our results imply that the ospA gene might be more divergent than the three species-specific plasmid sequences and point to a wider genetic heterogeneity of Borrelia spp. in ticks than in humans. Similar conclusions were reached by different approaches and in several countries (17, 19, 36). Culturing of B. burgdorferi might also select specific genotypes among the ones able to infect ticks (20).

The amplification products obtained with the B. garinii primers and 12 ticks were sequenced (31) and compared with the N34 cloned plasmid sequence which had allowed the design of the species-specific primers (18). The aligned sequences over a limited region were identical to the N34 B. garinii sequence (not shown). This sequencing (which confirmed that the amplified products originated from B. burgdorferi DNA templates) stresses the possibility that the strains in ticks which could not be identified by species-specific primers belong to genetically distinct species.

Acknowledgments

M.-C. Misonne received a predoctoral grant from the Institut pour l’Encouragement de la Recherche Scientifique dans l’Industrie et l’Agriculture. P. P. Hoet is research director of the National Fund for Scientific Research (Brussels, Belgium). This work was supported by a grant (contract 1.5.019.98) from the National Fund for Scientific Research.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Anthonissen F, De Kesel M, Hoet P P, Bigaignon G H. Evidence for the involvement of different genospecies of Borrelia in the clinical outcome of Lyme disease in Belgium. Res Microbiol. 1994;145:327–331. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(94)90187-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Assous M V, Postic D, Paul G, Névot P, Baranton G. Western blot analysis of sera from Lyme borreliosis patients according to the genomic species of the Borrelia strains used as antigens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993;12:261–268. doi: 10.1007/BF01967256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baranton G, Postic D, Saint Girons I, Boerlin P, Piffaretti J C, Assous M, Grimont P A D. Delineation of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, Borrelia garinii sp. nov., and group VS461 associated with Lyme borreliosis. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992;42:378–383. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-3-378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bigaignon G, Martin P, Tomasi J P, Gonzalez M, Lozes E, Gillion P, Fain A. La maladie de Lyme en Belgique: présence du spirochète Borrelia burgdorferi dans les tiques Ixodes ricinus récoltées dans la région mosane. Rev Med Liege. 1989;64:489–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boerlin P, Péter O, Bretz A-G, Postic D, Baranton G, Piffaretti J-C. Population genetic analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi isolates by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Infect Immun. 1992;60:1677–1683. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.4.1677-1683.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Burgdorferi W, Barbour A G, Hayes S F, Benach J L, Grunwaldt E, Davis J P. Lyme disease—a tick-borne spirochetosis? Science. 1982;216:1317–1319. doi: 10.1126/science.7043737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Canica M M, Nato F, du Merle L, Mazie J C, Baranton G, Postic D. Monoclonal antibodies for identification of Borrelia afzelii sp. nov. associated with late cutaneous manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. Scand J Infect Dis. 1993;25:441–448. doi: 10.3109/00365549309008525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Demaerschalck I, Ben Messaoud A, De Kesel M, Hoyois B, Lobet Y, Hoet P, Bigaignon G, Bollen A, Godfroid E. Simultaneous presence of different Borrelia burgdorferi genospecies in biological fluids of Lyme disease patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:602–608. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.3.602-608.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guttman D S, Wang P W, Wang I N, Bosler E M, Luft B J, Dykhuizen D E. Multiple infections of Ixodes scapularis ticks by Borrelia burgdorferi as revealed by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:652–656. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.3.652-656.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kawabata H, Masuzawa T, Yanagihara Y. Genomic analysis of Borrelia japonica sp. nov. isolated from Ixodes ovatus in Japan. Microbiol Immunol. 1993;37:843–848. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1993.tb01714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lonneux J F, Van Impe G, Lebrun P, Tricot J M. Une spirochétose transmise par les tiques (Acariens): la maladie de Lyme. Rev Quest Sci. 1990;161:189–208. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Marconi R T, Garon C F. Development of polymerase chain reaction primer sets for diagnosis of Lyme disease and for species-specific identification of Lyme disease isolates by 16S rRNA signature nucleotide analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:2830–2834. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2830-2834.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Marconi R T, Garon C F. Identification of a third genomic group of Borrelia burgdorferi through signature nucleotide analysis and 16S rRNA sequence determination. J Gen Microbiol. 1992;138:533–536. doi: 10.1099/00221287-138-3-533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marconi R T, Garon C F. Phylogenic analysis of the genus Borrelia: a comparison of North American and European isolates of B. burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:241–244. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.1.241-244.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marconi R T, Lubke L, Hauglum W, Garon C F. Species-specific identification of and distinction between Borrelia burgdorferi genomic groups by using 16S rRNA-directed oligonucleotide probes. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:628–632. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.3.628-632.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marconi R T, Liveris D, Schwartz I. Identification of novel insertion elements, restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns, and discontinuous 23S rRNA in Lyme disease spirochetes: phylogenetic analyses of rRNA genes and their intergenic spacers in Borrelia japonica sp. nov. and genomic group 21038 (Borrelia andersonii sp. nov.) isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2427–2434. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2427-2434.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mathiesen D A, Oliver J H, Jr, Kolbert C P, Tullson E D, Johnson B J B, Campbell G L, Mitchell P D, Reed K D, Telford III S R, Anderson J F, Lane R S, Persing D H. Genetic heterogeneity of Borrelia burgdorferi in the United States. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:98–107. doi: 10.1093/infdis/175.1.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Misonne M-C, Hoet P. Species-specific plasmid sequences for the PCR identification of the three species of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato involved in Lyme disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:269–272. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.1.269-272.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nohlmans L M K E, deBoer R, van den Bogaard A E J M, van Boven C P A. Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi isolates from The Netherlands. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:119–125. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.119-125.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Norris D E, Johnson B J B, Piesman J, Maupin G O, Clark J L, Black W C., IV Culturing selects for specific genotypes of Borrelia burgdorferi in an enzootic cycle in Colorado. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2359–2364. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.9.2359-2364.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Olsén B, Jaenson T G T, Bergström S. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato-infected ticks on migrating birds. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:3082–3087. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.8.3082-3087.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Persing D H, Telford III S R, Spielman A, Barthold S W. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in Ixodes dammini ticks with the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:566–572. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.3.566-572.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Péter O, Bretz A-G, Bee D. Occurrence of different genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in ixodid ticks of Valais, Switzerland. Eur J Epidemiol. 1995;11:463–467. doi: 10.1007/BF01721234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pichon B, Godfroid E, Hoyois B, Bollen A, Rodhain F, Perez-Eid C. Simultaneous infection of Ixodes ricinus nymphs by two Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species: possible implications for clinical manifestations. Emerg Infect Dis. 1995;1:89. doi: 10.3201/eid0103.950304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Picken R P. Polymerase chain reaction primers and probes derived from flagellin gene sequences for specific detection of the agents of Lyme disease and North American relapsing fever. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:99–114. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.99-114.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Postic D, Assous M V, Grimont P A D, Baranton G. Diversity of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato evidenced by restriction fragment polymorphism of rrf (5S)-rrl (23S) intergenic spacer amplicons. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994;44:743–752. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-4-743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Probert W S, Allsup K M, LeFebvre R B. Identification and characterization of a surface-exposed, 66-kilodalton protein from Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 1995;63:1933–1939. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.5.1933-1939.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rijpkema S G T, Molkenboer M J C H, Schouls L M, Jongejan F, Schellekens J F P. Simultaneous detection and genotyping of three genomic groups of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in dutch Ixodes ricinus ticks by characterization of the amplified intergenic spacer region between 5S and 23S rRNA genes. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:3091–3095. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.12.3091-3095.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rijpkema S, Golubic D, Molkenboer M, Verbeek-De Kruif N, Schellekens J. Identification of four genomic groups of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in a Lyme borreliosis endemic region of northern Croatia. Exp Appl Acarol. 1996;20:23–30. doi: 10.1007/BF00051474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rosa P A, Hogan D, Schwan T G. Polymerase chain reaction analyses identify two distinct classes of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:524–532. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.524-532.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Steere A C. Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:586–596. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198908313210906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Theisen M, Frederiksen B, Lebech A M, Vuust J, Hansen K. Polymorphism in ospC gene of Borrelia burgdorferi and immunoreactivity of OspC protein: implications for taxonomy and for use of OspC protein as a diagnostic antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:2570–2576. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2570-2576.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.van Dam A P, Kuiper H, Vos K, Widjojokusumo A, de Jongh B M, Spanjaard L, Ramselaar A C P, Kramer M D, Dankert J. Different genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi are associated with distinct clinical manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;17:708–717. doi: 10.1093/clinids/17.4.708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Welsh J, Pretzman C, Postic D, Saint Girons I, Baranton G, McClelland M. Genomic fingerprinting by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction resolves Borrelia burgdorferi into three distinct phyletic groups. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992;42:370–377. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-3-370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Gobel U B, Graf B, Jauris S, Soutschek E, Schwab E, Zumstein G. An OspA serotyping system for Borrelia burgdorferi based on reactivity with monoclonal antibodies and OspA sequence analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:340–350. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.340-350.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES