ABSTRACT
Proinflammatory factors play important roles in the pathogenesis of African swine fever virus (ASFV), which is the causative agent of African swine fever (ASF), a highly contagious and severe hemorrhagic disease. Efforts in the prevention and treatment of ASF have been severely hindered by knowledge gaps in viral proteins responsible for modulating host antiviral responses. In this study, we identified the I10L protein (pI10L) of ASFV as a potential inhibitor of the TNF-α- and IL-1β-triggered NF-κB signaling pathway, the most canonical and important part of host inflammatory responses. The ectopically expressed pI10L remarkably suppressed the activation of NF-κB signaling in HEK293T and PK-15 cells. The ASFV mutant lacking the I10L gene (ASFVΔI10L) induced higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines production in primary porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) compared with its parental ASFV HLJ/2018 strain (ASFVWT). Mechanistic studies suggest that pI10L inhibits IKKβ phosphorylation by reducing the K63-linked ubiquitination of NEMO, which is necessary for the activation of IKKβ. Morever, pI10L interacts with the kinase domain of IKKβ through its N-terminus, and consequently blocks the association of IKKβ with its substrates IκBα and p65, leading to reduced phosphorylation. In addition, the nuclear translocation efficiency of p65 was also altered by pI10L. Further biochemical evidence supported that the amino acids 1–102 on pI10L were essential for the pI10L-mediated suppression of the NF-κB signaling pathway. The present study clarifies the immunosuppressive activity of pI10L, and provides novel insights into the understanding of ASFV pathobiology and the development of vaccines against ASF.
IMPORTANCE
African swine fever (ASF), caused by the African swine fever virus (ASFV), is now widespread in many countries and severely affects the commercial rearing of swine. To date, few safe and effective vaccines or antiviral strategies have been marketed due to large gaps in knowledge regarding ASFV pathobiology and immune evasion mechanisms. In this study, we deciphered the important role of the ASFV-encoded I10L protein in the TNF-α-/IL-1β-triggered NF-κB signaling pathway. This study provides novel insights into the pathogenesis of ASFV and thus contributes to the development of vaccines against ASF.
KEYWORDS: African swine fever virus, inflammatory response, I10L protein, IKKβ
INTRODUCTION
African swine fever (ASF) is a highly contagious disease of swine with mortality approaching 100%. Since it was first identified in Kenya in 1921, ASF has currently distributed in 42 countries in five different world regions, with more than 1,120,000 animal losses from January 2021 to March 2023 (1) (https://www.oie.int/en/animal-health-in-the-world/animal-diseases/african-swine-fever /). Although the ASF outbreak has now reached epidemic proportions and has severely affected the global production of swine, the effective vaccines are currently unavailable for the control of ASF except the ASFV-G-ΔI177L vaccine in Vietnam (2).
African swine fever virus (ASFV), the causative agent of ASF, is the only known member of the genus Asfivirus within the family Asfarviridae (3). ASFV is a multilayered double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) virus that shares structural, genomic, and replicative characteristics with other large nucleocytoplasmic DNA viruses. ASFV encodes more than 160 proteins that enable successful infection, replication, and immune evasion in vivo (4 – 6). To date, the functions, subcellular locations, and transcriptional features of only a few viral proteins have been described (6, 7). Large gaps in knowledge regarding the composition of infectious virions, viral proteins responsible for immune evasion, and pathogenesis have severely hindered the development of vaccines (8).
ASFV mainly targets primary macrophages and monocytes (9 – 11), which increase the secretion of the proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and IL-8 (12). As major components of host antiviral innate immunity, TNF-α and IL-1β play central roles in controlling the replication of many viruses, such as classical swine fever virus (13) and Japanese encephalitis virus (14). Previous studies have demonstrated that the elevated levels of TNF-α play important roles in the pathogenesis of ASF due to its proinflammatory, proapoptotic, and procoagulant profile (15, 16). NF-κB activation is one of the hallmarks following TNF-α and IL-1β stimulation. Once the plasma membrane-anchored receptors [tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) or interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R)] bind to their respective ligands, they recruit and activate adaptors and kinases, including TNFR-associated death domain protein (TRADD), Myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88), TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), TAK1-binding protein 2 (TAB2), TAB3, and IκB kinase β (IKKβ) (17, 18). Following the phosphorylation and degradation of IκBα, the transcription factor NF-κB is released and translocated to the nucleus, leading to the expression of various cytokines and chemokines and subsequent inflammatory responses (19, 20).
Recently, several ASFV proteins that regulate the activation of NF-κB have been identified. The F317L protein interacts with IKKβ and suppresses its phosphorylation, which subsequently stabilizes IκBα and blocks the activation and nuclear translocation of NF-κB, which results in decreased expression of various proinflammatory cytokines and an increased viral replication efficiency (21). The MGF505-7R protein (pMGF505-7R) inhibits NF-κB activation by binding to IKKα, leading to a reduced IL-1β production. ASFV lacking the MGF505-7R gene has shown reduced virulence in piglets (22). Deletion of the H240R gene decreases infectious viral progeny production due to the aberrant virion morphogenesis and enhanced inflammatory cytokine expression, both in vitro and in vivo (23, 24). The MGF360-12L protein significantly inhibits the host mRNA transcription and the promoter activity of IFN-β and NF-κB, as well as the nuclear localization of p50 and p65 by competitively inhibiting the interaction between NF-κB and nuclear transport proteins (25). The early expressed L83L protein (pL83L) specifically associates with IL-1β; however, deletion of the L83L gene only slightly affects the virulence of ASFV (26). Further in-depth studies on the mechanisms underlying the regulation of inflammatory responses by ASFV are urgently needed and may be helpful in understanding this devastating disease.
In the present study, we identified the ASFV I10L protein (pI10L) as a potential inhibitor of the TNF-α- and IL-1β-triggered NF-κB signaling pathway. The pI10L contains approximately 170 amino acids (aa), and belongs to the ASFV p22 family (27). Similar to the inner envelope structural protein p22, pI10L has a transmembrane domain at its N terminus (28). However, little is known about the biological function of pI10L (29). Our results demonstrate that pI10L significantly inhibits the TNF-α- and IL-1β-induced transcription of proinflammatory genes and activation of the NF-κB promoter. The ASFV mutant lacking the I10L gene (ASFVΔI10L) induced much higher levels of CCL2, IL-8, and TNF-α than did the parental ASFV HLJ/2018 strain (ASFVWT). The phosphorylation of IKKβ, IκBα, and p65 in the ASFVΔI10L-infected primary porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) was significantly increased. Mechanistic studies suggest that the K63-linked ubiquitination of the NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO) is dramatically reduced by pI10L, followed by the inhibition of the phosphorylation of IKKβ. Besides, pI10L inhibits the association of IKKβ with IκBα and p65, which in turn inhibits the phosphorylation and degradation of IκBα, as well as the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of p65, leading to reduced expression of proinflammatory cytokines. Taken together, our findings reveal the immunomodulatory activity of pI10L, which will help better illustrate the immune evasion mechanisms and pathogenesis of ASFV. These efforts will contribute to the development of vaccines against ASF as well as therapeutics to treat the disease.
RESULTS
The ASFV pI10L inhibits the TNF-α- and IL-1β-triggered activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway
To identify candidate molecules involved in virus-induced inflammatory responses, we screened 179 ASFV proteins for their ability to regulate the TNF-α-triggered activation of the NF-κB signaling in reporter assays. These efforts led to the identification of the ASFV pI10L (Fig. 1A). Further experiments in HEK293T cells indicated that pI10L inhibited the TNF-α- and IL-1β-triggered activation of the NF-κB promoter in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1B). To investigate whether pI10L is involved in the regulation of endogenous NF-κB signaling, we measured the transcription levels of several proinflammatory cytokines following treatment with TNF-α and IL-1β in the pI10L-expressing HEK293T cells. The ectopically expressed pI10L remarkably inhibited the mRNA transcription levels of the CCL20, IL-8, and TNF-α genes induced by TNF-α and IL-1β, as demonstrated by quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) (Fig. 1C). Consistently, the phosphorylation of IκBα and p65 induced by TNF-α and IL-1β, which are the hallmarks of the activation of downstream signaling components, was remarkably inhibited in the pI10L-expressing HEK293T cells compared with the empty vector (Vec)-transfected cells (Fig. 1D). These results suggest that pI10L is involved in regulating the expression of proinflammatory cytokines triggered by TNF-α and IL-1β.
Considering that pigs are the only mammalian species known to be susceptible to ASFV, a PK-15 cell line stably expressing pI10L was established to further identify its function. Immunoblotting analysis demonstrated that pI10L was expressed in PK-15 cells (Fig. 2A). Confocal microscopy indicated that pI10L was expressed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig. 2B). In agreement with results from HEK293T cells, RT-qPCR results showed that the ectopically expressed pI10L dramatically inhibited the TNF-α- and IL-1β-induced transcription of the CCL2, IL-8, and TNF-α genes in PK-15 cells (Fig. 2C). Moreover, pI10L reduced the phosphorylation of IκBα and p65, followed by delayed degradation of IκBα in PK-15 cells (Fig. 2D). Taken together, the results suggest that pI10L inhibits the TNF-α- and IL-1β-triggered NF-κB signaling pathway.
Deletion of the I10L gene from ASFV results in enhanced activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway
To characterize the functional role of pI10L in the regulation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, recombinant ASFVΔI10L was generated from highly virulent ASFVWT by homologous recombination. The I10L gene was replaced with a fluorescent gene EGFP-containing cassette under the control of the ASFV p72 promoter (Fig. 3A). ASFVΔI10L was generated and purified after 10 rounds of fluorescence screening (Fig. 3B). The recombinant ASFV without parental ASFV contamination was confirmed by diagnostic PCR (Fig. 3C). The results of hemadsorption assay revealed “rosettes” of red blood cells on the ASFVΔI10L- or ASFVWT-infected PAMs, indicating that the deletion of I10L did not affect the hemadsorption property of ASFV (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, the growth kinetics of ASFVΔI10L were similar to those of ASFVWT depending on the time point considered (Fig. 3E), indicating that the I10L gene deletion did not affect the replication of ASFV in PAMs.
To verify the function of pI10L, we next examined the abilities of ASFVΔI10L in regulating the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway. ASFVΔH240R, a recombinant ASFV lacking the H240R gene (23) was included as a positive control to validate the results. Following infection of PAMs with ASFVΔI10L, ASFVΔH240R, or ASFVWT at a multiplication of infection (MOI) of one for 48 hours, the PAMs were treated with TNF-α or RPMI-1640 medium for another 20 minutes. As shown in the Fig. 3F, the deletion of the I10L or H240R gene resulted in enhanced transcription of proinflammatory cytokines compared with ASFVWT upon treatment with TNF-α in PAMs, and the data of pH240R were consistent with the previous studies (23, 24, 30). Consistently, the ASFVΔI10L-infected PAMs showed elevated phosphorylation levels of IκBα and p65 (Fig. 3G). These results suggest that pI10L plays an important role in the evasion of antiviral responses to ASFV.
The ASFV pI10L is associated with IKKβ, NEMO, and NF-κB
It has been previously reported that pI10L functions in the TNF-α- and IL-1β-triggered NF-κB signaling, suggesting that this protein probably works at TAK1/TABs complex or its downstream level, which is the convergence of two pathways (19). To identify the targets involved in pI10L function, various components involved in NF-κB signaling (including TRADD, MYD88, TRAF6, TAK1, TAB1, IKKβ, and p65) were co-expressed with pI10L. As shown in Fig. 4A, pI10L inhibited the activation of the NF-κB promoter mediated by all tested molecules upstream of p65, indicating that pI10L may function at the p65 level. In addition, transient transfection and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) experiments confirmed that pI10L interacted with IKKβ, NEMO, p65, and p50, but not with TAK1, TAB2, TAB3, or IKKα (Fig. 4B and C). The results of GST pulldown assays further confirmed that pI10L was directly associated with IKKβ, NEMO, p65, and p50 directly in vitro (Fig. 4D). In addition, endogenous co-IP experiments indicated that pI10L was constitutively associated with IKKβ, NEMO, p65, and p50 in PK-15 cells. Moreover, this interaction was not affected by TNF-α (Fig. 4E). Consistently, confocal microscopy showed that pI10L co-localized with IKKβ, NEMO, p65, and p50 mainly in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4F). These results suggest that pI10L is associated with IKKs and NF-κB, and may function at the p65 level.
The ASFV I10L protein regulates the activation and the association of IKKβ with IκBα and p65
IKKβ is the principal kinase responsible for phosphorylating IκBα (31) and p65 (32), and IKKβ phosphorylation plays a central role in IKK complex activation. This study indicated that the TNF-α-triggered phosphorylation of IKKβ was significantly prevented by the ectopically expressed pI10L (Fig. 5A). It has been reported that NEMO, the regulatory subunit of IKK complex, can be ubiquitinated by TRAF6 and TRAF2/5, and this K63-linked polyubiquitination is essential for the activation of IKKβ (33). To determine how pI10L regulates IKKβ activation, the K63-linked ubiquitination (Ub) of NEMO was examined. Western blot analysis showed that Ub-K63 linked conjugation to NEMO was decreased in the presence of pI10L (Fig. 5B). Compared with the parental virus ASFVWT, ASFVΔI10L infection consistently and remarkably enhanced the phosphorylation levels of IKKβ (Fig. 5C) and the K63-linked ubiquitination of NEMO (Fig. 5D) upon TNF-α treatment. This suggests that the pI10L inhibits the IKKβ phosphorylation by reducing the K63-linked ubiquitination of NEMO.
It has been shown that the assembly of the IKK complex is indispensable for IKKβ activation (34). The results demonstrated that pI10L had no effect on the expression or dimerization of NEMO (Fig. 6A and B), nor did it affect the association between IKKβ and NEMO (Fig. 6C). Thus, pI10L does not regulate the assembly of the IKK complex assembly. Competitive binding experiments were subsequently carried out to explore whether pI10L affects the assembly of NF-κB complexes, as well as the association between IKKβ and its substrates IκBα and p65. As shown in Fig. 6D, pI10L is not involved in the binding of p65 and p50. Interestingly, pI10L remarkably impaired the interaction between IKKβ and IκBα or p65 (Fig. 6E and F). In addition, upon treatment with increasing concentrations of pI10L, the IKKβ-mediated phosphorylation of IκBα and p65 was decreased in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6G). To investigate whether pI10L directly regulates the kinase activity of IKKβ, an in vitro kinase assay was performed. Immunoblotting analysis showed that IκBα and p65 were phosphorylated by IKKβ in the presence of ATP, whereas the addition of pI10L dramatically impaired this phosphorylation process (Fig. 6H). Taken together, our findings show that pI10L functions by regulating K63-linked polyubiquitination of NEMO to suppress the activation of IKKβ. Furthermore, pI10L is associated with IKKβ, which in turn suppresses its kinase activity towards IκBα and p65, thereby inhibiting the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway.
The ASFV I10L protein inhibits the nuclear translocation of p65
It has been shown that the nuclear translocation of p65, which is released after IκBα is degraded upon phosphorylation by IKKβ, is an indicator of the NF-κB signaling activation (20). Therefore, we examined whether p65 is translocated to the nucleus in the presence of pI10L. The results of subcellular fractionation assay and confocal microscopy analysis showed that the TNF-α-induced nuclear translocation of p65 was inhibited in the pI10L-expressing cells (Fig. 7A and B). Furthermore, the results indicated that the deficiency of pI10L attenuated the ability of ASFV to antagonize the TNF-α-induced nuclear translocation of p65 (Fig. 7C). The results indicated that the deletion of pI10L weakened the ability of ASFV to block the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway.
Amino acids 1–102 on pI10L are essential for suppressing NF-κB activation
To investigate the crucial regions in IKKβ and pI10L responsible for their interaction, as well as the suppression of NF-κB activation, we constructed a series of plasmids expressing the complete or truncated IKKβ (Fig. 8A) and pI10L (Fig. 8B). Domain mapping analysis revealed that the kinase domain of IKKβ was responsible for its interaction with pI10L (Fig. 8C). Consistently, the truncated pI10L containing aa 1–102 was sufficient to bind to IKKβ (Fig. 8D). These results further confirm that the binding of pI10L to IKKβ ultimately suppresses the catalytic activity of IKKβ.
We next evaluated whether the aa 1–102 of pI10L are sufficient to inhibit the TNF-α-triggered activation of the NF-κB signaling. In reporter assay, all the mutants containing aa 1–102 were found to remarkably inhibit the activation of the NF-κB promoter (Fig. 8E). RT-qPCR experiments demonstrated that the ectopic expression of pI10L or pI10L(aa1-102) dramatically reduced the transcript level of the CCL2, IL-8, and TNF-α genes in PK-15 cells (Fig. 8F). Consistently, the phosphorylation of IκBα and p65 (Fig. 8G), as well as the nuclear translocation of p65 (Fig. 8H), were remarkably impaired in the pI10L- or pI10L(aa1-102)-expressing PK-15 cells. Taken together, our results suggest that the domain defined by aa 1–102 on pI10L is essential for the suppression of NF-κB activation.
DISCUSSION
The innate immune response is the first line of host defense against viral infection and is initiated upon sensing conserved viral structural components called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) in host cells (35 – 37). The sensing of viral PAMPs by PRRs activates a series of signaling events, leading to the expression of downstream antiviral effector proteins including type I interferons and proinflammatory cytokines (37 – 39). ASFV is a giant, complex DNA virus that encodes more than 160 proteins required for successful infection, thereby enabling replication and immune evasion in vivo. Previous studies have demonstrated that ASFV infection activates antiviral signaling pathways with increased expression levels of interferon-stimulated genes and proinflammatory cytokines (15), especially the NF-κB signaling (40). However, the mechanisms of ASFV immune evasion remain unclear. In this study, we identified the ASFV pI10L as an inhibitor of virus-induced inflammatory responses following viral infection and treatment with TNF-α or IL-1β.
We found that transient transfection of I10L in HEK293T cells remarkably inhibited the activation of the NF-κB promoter, transcription of proinflammatory cytokines, and the phosphorylation of IκBα and p65 induced by TNF-α or IL-1β. We obtained the same results as in the PK-15 cells stably expressing pI10L. These findings suggest that pI10L plays an important role in the immune escape of ASFV in different cell types.
Considering the unbiased effects on the TNF-α- and IL-1β-triggered NF-κB signaling, we hypothesized that pI10L functions at the level of or downstream of the TAK1-TABs complex. Interestingly, pI10L inhibited p65 and all the tested proteins upstream of the p65-mediated activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway. In addition, pI10L was found to be associated with IKKβ, NEMO, and NF-κB. There are several possible mechanisms underlying how pI10L functions. Firstly, pI10L inhibits the activation of IKKβ by impairing the assembly of the IKK complex or the polyubiquitination of NEMO. Secondly, it is possible that pI10L suppresses the binding of p65 to p50. Thirdly, pI10L could block the activation and nuclear translocation of p65. The results demonstrated that pI10L inhibits the phosphorylation of IKKβ by regulating the K63-linked ubiquitination of NEMO, as well as reduced the catalytic activity of towards IκBα and p65 by interacting with IKKβ. However, pI10L only slightly interfered with the assembly of the NF-κB or IKK complex.
It has been reported that IκBα and p65 are phosphorylated by IKKβ in the TNF-α- and IL-1β-triggered NF-κB signaling pathway (41). Therefore, we performed kinase assays in vitro. The results confirmed that IKKβ could phosphorylate IκBα and p65, but this effect was remarkably inhibited by pI10L, owing to the fact that pI10L interrupted the binding of IκBα and p65 to IKKβ. Using subcellular fractionation assay and confocal microscopy analysis, we found that ectopically expressed pI10L dramatically inhibited the translocation of p65 to the nuclear. Domain mapping analysis indicated that pI10L interacts with the kinase domain of IKKβ through its N-terminal (aa 1–102). Together, these findings demonstrate that pI10L inhibits IKKβ kinase activity through direct association with IKKβ, obstructing its catalytic center, or by competing with IκBα and p65 as a substrate. Confirming the exact mechanism will be a very interesting direction for future investigation.
Furthermore, the effects of pI10L on the expression of proinflammatory cytokines were explored using the I10L gene-deleted ASFV. The results showed that the hemadsorption and replication of ASFV were slightly affected by pI10L in PAMs. However, ASFVΔI10L induced higher activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway than did ASFVWT. To date, several other ASFV-encoded proteins that regulate the activation of NF-κB have been identified, such as the pL83L (26), pMGF505-7R (22, 42), and the H240R protein (pH240R) (23, 30). ASFV lacking these genes induces decreased expression of various proinflammatory cytokines and increased viral replication, whereas the relationship among these regulators remains unclear. Single gene deletion hardly affects the virulence of ASFV (except for pMGF505-7R and pH240R), which may be because these proteins function in concert during viral infection and pathogenesis. For example, the proteins may participate in the inflammatory response during different stages of viral infection. To hasten the development of an effective vaccine against ASF, further in-depth studies are needed to explore how these proteins work together.
In conclusion, as illustrated in Fig. 9, our findings demonstrated a critical role of pI10L in regulating the TNF-α- and IL-1β-triggered NF-κB signaling by targeting IKKβ. As the inflammatory response plays an important role in the pathogenesis of ASF (15, 16) and host antiviral innate immunity, the identification of pI10L helps clarify the complicated immune evasion mechanisms of ASFV and may lead to the discovery of potential targets for the development of novel ASF vaccines or antivirals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reagents, cells, and viruses
Recombinant human TNF-α (catalog no. 300-01A) and IL-1β (catalog no. 200-01B) were purchased from Peprotech (Cranbury, NJ, USA). HEK293T cells were kindly provided by Dr. Hong-Bing Shu, and PK-15 cells were obtained from the ATCC. The ASFV HLJ/2018 strain was isolated from field samples in China as previously described (GenBank accession no. MK333180.1)
Construction of plasmids
The plasmids expressing the HA-, Flag-, or His-tagged pI10L, TRADD, MYD88, TAK1, TAB1, TAB2, TAB3, IKKα, IKKβ, NEMO, IκBα, p65, p50, and their mutants were constructed by standard molecular biology techniques. The stable cell lines stabling expressing pI10L or its truncated mutants were established using the lentivirus-mediated gene-editing technology (43). Briefly, HEK293T cells were transfected with the packaging plasmids psPAX2 and pMD2.0G, recombinant plasmids, or the empty vector pLOV. After 36–48 hours, the pseudovirus-containing culture supernatant was harvested to infect PK-15 cells in the presence of polybrene (8 µg/mL). The infected cells were screened with puromycin (3 µg/mL) for 6 days to establish stable cell lines. The primers used in this study are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Plasmids | Primers (5’−3’) |
---|---|
pFlag-pI10L | F: CCGGGATTTGGATCCATGTTTTATCCTGTTGTTCA
R: CTTGTAGTCGCTAGCAAGTACATTTCTGGCTATTC |
pFlag-pI10L(aa 1–102) | F: CCGGGATTTGGATCCATGTTTTATCCTGTTGTTCA
R: CTTGTAGTCGCTAGCTATACGTGTTTTTCCAAATG |
Transfection and reporter assays
HEK293T and PK-15 cells were transfected using the standard polyetherimide method. In the reporter assays, an empty control plasmid was added separately to ensure the same amount of total DNA was present in a simple sample. Luciferase assays were performed using a dual-specific luciferase assay kit (catalog no. E1910; Promega). The data shown are the firefly luciferase activity levels of the indicated samples normalized to Renilla luciferase activity.
RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol Reagent (catalog no. 9108; TaKaRa) and reverse-transcribed to cDNA using the HiScript III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (catalog no. R312-01; Vazyme) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. qPCR was performed in triplicate using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix (catalog no. R223-01; Vazyme) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Data shown are the relative abundance of the indicated mRNAs normalized to those of GAPDH. The primers used for RT-qPCR are listed in Table 2.
TABLE 2.
Gene name | Sequence (5’−3’) |
---|---|
h-GAPDH | F:GACAAGCTTCCCGTTCTCAG
R:GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTGGT |
h-CCL20 | F:AAGTTGTCTGTGTGCGCAAATCC
R:CCATTCCAGAAAAGCCACAGTTTT |
h-IL8 | F:GAGAGTGATTGAGAGTGGACCAC
R:CACAACCCTCTGCACCCAGTTT |
h-TNF-α | F:GCCGCATCGCCGTCTCCTAC
R:CCTCAGCCCCCTCTGGGGTC |
Sus-GAPDH | F:ACATGGCCTCCAAGGAGTAAGA
R:GATCGAGTTGGGGCTGTGACT |
Sus-CCL2 | F:ATCTTCAAGACCATCGCGGG
R:TCAAGGCTTCGGAGTTTGGTT |
Sus-IL8 | F:TGGCAGTTTTCCTGCTTTCT
R:CAGTGGGGTCCACTCTCAAT |
Sus-TNF-α | F:GCCCAAGGACTCAGATCATC
R:GGCATTGGCATACCCACTCT |
I10L | F:ACAGATACGGATTGTAAGGA
R:ATCAGCAGTAGTGGCATTA |
Confocal microscopy
Confocal microscopy assay was performed as described previously (44). Briefly, at 24 hours post-transfection, HEK293T cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes and permeabilized for 20 minutes using 0.1% Triton X-100. Next, the cells were blocked with 1% BSA for 30 minutes and stained with DAPI (catalog no. 36308E; Yeasen) or mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) against Flag (catalog no. 66008-4-Ig; Proteintech), rabbit MAb against IKKβ (catalog no. 8943S; Cell Signaling Technology), NF-κB p65 (catalog no. 8242S; Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) against NF-κB1 (catalog no. A14754; ABclonal), or IKKγ (catalog no. A12536; ABclonal). Lastly, the cells were imaged using a Zeiss confocal microscope with a 63× oil objective.
Co-IP and immunoblotting analysis
The cells transfected with plasmids expressing indicated proteins were lysed with M2 lysis buffer (45) [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5% NP-40, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, and 3 mM EGTA] containing protease inhibitors, and sonicated for 2 minutes. The lysates were centrifuged at 13,000× g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatants were immunoprecipitated with the mouse anti-Flag MAb, rabbit anti-HA (catalog no. 66006-2-Ig; Proteintech), anti-Myc (catalog no. 60003-2-Ig; Proteintech), anti-IKKβ, or anti-NF-κB p65 MAb, or rabbit anti-NF-κB1 or anti-IKKγ PAb or anti-Flag M2 Magnetic Beads (catalog no. M8823, Sigma). The beads were then washed three times with cold M2 lysis buffer. Bound proteins were separated through SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting analysis.
GST pulldown assay
To prepare Escherichia coli for pI10L expression, the recombinant plasmid pGEX-6p-1-pI10L was transformed into E. coli (BL21) cells. The cells in the logarithmic phase were then incubated with IPTG (0.8 mmol/L) for 12 hours at 20°C. After centrifugation, enriched bacterial cultures were resuspended and lysed using a high-pressure homogeneous sterilizer. The supernatants containing recombinant GST or GST-pI10L protein were purified using ChromoTek GST-Trap Agarose beads (catalog no. sta; Proteintech). GST and GST-pI10L were incubated with cell lysates containing the ectopically expressed IKKβ, NEMO, p65, or p50 at 4°C for 12 hours. Subsequently, the bound proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting analysis.
Kinase assay
The flag-tagged pI10L, IKKβ, p65, or IκBα were ectopically expressed and collected for immunoprecipitation assay with anti-Flag M2 magnetic beads (catalog no. M8823; Sigma). Each enriched protein was dissolved in kinase reaction buffer (46) [25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.01% Triton X-100, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM Na3VO4, 2.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EGTA], with or without 100 µM ATP. Equal amounts of substrates IκBα or p65, with or without IKKβ and pI10L, were subjected to the kinase assay in the reaction buffer and incubated at 37°C for 3 hours. The reaction was stopped with SDS loading buffer, and the bound proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting analysis with mouse anti-Flag MAb, rabbit anti-phospho-NF-κB p65Ser536 (catalog no. 3033S; Cell Signaling Technology) or anti-phospho-IκBα Ser32 (catalog no. 2859S; Cell Signaling Technology) MAb.
Subcellular fractionation
To separate the nuclear fraction (Nuc) and cytoplasmic fraction (Cyt), PK-15 cell lines or PAMs under the treatment of TNF-α were washed three times with PBS and once in hypotonic buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2) (47) supplemented with the protease inhibitor PMSF, resuspended in hypotonic buffer, and lysed by leaching homogenization. The lysates were centrifuged at 4°C for 10 minutes at 500× g to obtain Nuc pellets, and the supernatants were collected as Cyt supernatant. Nuc pellets were lysed in RIPA buffer with an equal volume of Cyt supernatant, and subjected to western blot analysis with mouse anti-Flag or anti-β-actin (catalog no. CL594-66009; Proteintech) MAb, rabbit anti-lamin B1 PAb (catalog no. 12987-1-AP; Proteintech), or rabbit anti-NF-κB p65 MAb.
Generation and identification of the I10L-deleted ASFV mutant
The recombinant transfer vector pOK12-p72EGFP-ΔI10L, which harbors genomic sequences flanking the targeted gene mapping approximately 1.2 kb upstream and downstream homologous arms, and a reporter gene cassette containing the EGFP reporter under the control of the ASFV p72 gene promoter, was constructed. The left and right arms flanking the target gene were located in the ASFVWT genome at positions 180919-182119 and 182632-183832, respectively. The nucleotides in the genome at positions 182120–182632 were replaced with an expression cassette containing the EGFP reporter. Briefly, the left and right arms were amplified using PCR and assembled to contain an EGFP reporter harboring restriction enzyme sites at both termini using overlapping PCR. The cassette was cloned into the linearized pOK12 vector to generate the recombinant transfer vector pOK12-p72EGFP-ΔI10L using the Vazyme ClonExpress II one step cloning kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., China).
The I10L-deleted ASFV mutant ASFVΔI10L was generated by homologous recombination between the ASFVWT genome and the recombination transfer vector, using infection and transfection procedures in PAMs. This construct generated the expected deletion of the I10L gene. The virus resulting from homologous recombination was purified using successive limiting dilutions of PAMs. The purified ASFVΔI10L was amplified in PAMs to produce a viral stock. To ensure the absence of the desired deletion in each recombinant genome, viral DNA was extracted from ASFVΔI10L-infected PAMs and identified by PCR using specific primers targeting these genes. The primers used in this study are listed in Table 2.
Virus growth curve
PAM monolayers were prepared in 24-well plates and infected with ASFVΔI10L or ASFVWT at an MOI of 0.01. After 1 hour of adsorption, the cells were rinsed twice with PBS. The monolayers were incubated in the medium for 2, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, or 120 hours. At different time points, the ASFV-infected cultures were stored at −70°C. Subsequently, the thawed lysates were used to determine the viral titers in HAD50/mL in PAMs.
Hemadsorption assay
Approximately 5 × 104 PAMs were seeded in 96-well plates and infected with ASFVΔI10L or ASFVWT for 48 hours. The cells were then incubated with 5 × 105 porcine red blood cells diluted in PBS, and hemadsorption was observed on the fifth day.
Statistics analysis
GraphPad Prism and SPSS Statistics were used for statistical analysis. Quantitative data in histograms are shown as means ± SD. The data were analyzed using the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test or the unpaired Student’s t test. The number of asterisks represents the degree of significance with respect to P values. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. P values are indicated by asterisks in the figures as follows: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Prof. Hong-Bing Shu for providing the following essential materials: luciferase reporters, pRK vector, and HEK293T cells. We thank Prof. Youbao Zhao for valuable advice on writing the manuscript.
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 32102655, 32072855, 32272987, 31941001, and 32002278).
X.C., Z.Y.Y., B.W., W.R.H., L.F.L, G.Z., and H.J.Q. conceived and designed the study; X.C., Z.Y.Y., L.F.L., M.L., L.F.S., S.F., Z.Y.R., and X.J.C. performed the experiments; and all authors analyzed the data. X.C., B.W., W.R.H., L.F.L, and H.J.Q. wrote the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Contributor Information
Bo Wan, Email: wanboyi2000@163.com.
Hua-Ji Qiu, Email: qiuhuaji@caas.cn.
Gaiping Zhang, Email: zhanggaiping2003@163.com.
Wen-Rui He, Email: wrhe0111@163.com.
Jae U. Jung, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
REFERENCES
- 1. Netherton CL, Connell S, Benfield CTO, Dixon LK. 2019. The genetics of life and death: virus-host interactions underpinning resistance to African swine fever, a viral hemorrhagic disease. Front Genet 10:402. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ayanwale A, Trapp S, Guabiraba R, Caballero I, Roesch F. 2022. New insights in the interplay between African swine fever virus and innate immunity and its impact on viral pathogenicity. Front Microbiol 13:958307. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.958307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wang N, Zhao D, Wang J, Zhang Y, Wang M, Gao Y, Li F, Wang J, Bu Z, Rao Z, Wang X. 2019. Architecture of African swine fever virus and implications for viral assembly. Science 366:640–644. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz1439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Alonso C, Galindo I, Cuesta-Geijo MA, Cabezas M, Hernaez B, Muñoz-Moreno R. 2013. African swine fever virus-cell interactions: from virus entry to cell survival. Virus Res 173:42–57. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Simões M, Freitas FB, Leitão A, Martins C, Ferreira F. 2019. African swine fever virus replication events and cell nucleus: new insights and perspectives. Virus Res 270:197667. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2019.197667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wang GG, Xie MJ, Wu W, Chen ZZ. 2021. Structures and functional diversities of ASFV proteins. Viruses 13:2124. doi: 10.3390/v13112124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Malogolovkin A, Kolbasov D. 2019. Genetic and antigenic diversity of African swine fever virus. Virus Res 271:197673. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2019.197673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bosch-Camós L, López E, Rodriguez F. 2020. African swine fever vaccines: a promising work still in progress. Porcine Health Manag 6:17. doi: 10.1186/s40813-020-00154-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sánchez EG, Quintas A, Pérez-Núñez D, Nogal M, Barroso S, Carrascosa ÁL, Revilla Y. 2012. African swine fever virus uses macropinocytosis to enter host cells. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002754. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hernaez B, Alonso C. 2010. Dynamin- and clathrin-dependent endocytosis in African swine fever virus entry. J Virol 84:2100–2109. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01557-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Andrés G. 2017. African swine fever virus gets undressed: new insights on the entry pathway. J Virol 91:e01906-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01906-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zakaryan H, Cholakyans V, Simonyan L, Misakyan A, Karalova E, Chavushyan A, Karalyan Z. 2015. A study of lymphoid organs and serum proinflammatory cytokines in pigs infected with African swine fever virus genotype II. Arch Virol 160:1407–1414. doi: 10.1007/s00705-015-2401-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Liniger M, Gerber M, Renzullo S, García-Nicolás O, Ruggli N. 2021. TNF-mediated inhibition of classical swine fever virus replication is IRF1-, NF-kappaB- and JAK/STAT signaling-dependent. Viruses 13:2017. doi: 10.3390/v13102017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Das S, Mishra MK, Ghosh J, Basu A. 2008. Japanese encephalitis virus infection induces IL-18 and IL-1beta in microglia and astrocytes: correlation with in vitro cytokine responsiveness of glial cells and subsequent neuronal death. J Neuroimmunol 195:60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zheng Y, Li S, Li SH, Yu S, Wang Q, Zhang K, Qu L, Sun Y, Bi Y, Tang F, Qiu HJ, Gao GF. 2022. Transcriptome profiling in swine macrophages infected with African swine fever virus at single-cell resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2201288119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gómez-Villamandos JC, Bautista MJ, Sánchez-Cordón PJ, Carrasco L. 2013. Pathology of African swine fever: the role of monocyte-macrophage. Virus Res 173:140–149. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Barnabei L, Laplantine E, Mbongo W, Rieux-Laucat F, Weil R. 2021. NF-kappaB: at the borders of autoimmunity and inflammation. Front Immunol 12:716469. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.716469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zinatizadeh MR, Schock B, Chalbatani GM, Zarandi PK, Jalali SA, Miri SR. 2021. The nuclear factor Kappa B (NF-ΚB) signaling in cancer development and immune diseases. Genes Dis 8:287–297. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.06.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hu MM, Yang Q, Zhang J, Liu SM, Zhang Y, Lin H, Huang ZF, Wang YY, Zhang XD, Zhong B, Shu HB. 2014. TRIM38 inhibits TNFalpha- and IL-1beta-triggered NF-kappaB activation by mediating lysosome-dependent degradation of TAB2/3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:1509–1514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318227111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Verstrepen L, Bekaert T, Chau TL, Tavernier J, Chariot A, Beyaert R. 2008. TLR-4, IL-1R and TNF-R signaling to NF-kappaB: variations on a common theme. Cell Mol Life Sci 65:2964–2978. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8064-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Yang J, Li S, Feng T, Zhang X, Yang F, Cao W, Chen H, Liu H, Zhang K, Zhu Z, Zheng H, Lee B. 2021. African swine fever virus F317L protein inhibits NF-kappaB activation to evade host immune response and promote viral replication. mSphere 6. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00658-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Li J, Song J, Kang L, Huang L, Zhou S, Hu L, Zheng J, Li C, Zhang X, He X, Zhao D, Bu Z, Weng C, Dixon LK. 2021. Determines pathogenicity of African swine fever virus infection by inhibiting IL-1beta and type I IFN production. PLoS Pathog 17:e1009733. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhou P, Li LF, Zhang K, Wang B, Tang L, Li M, Wang T, Sun Y, Li S, Qiu HJ. 2022. Deletion of the H240R gene of African swine fever virus decreases infectious progeny virus production due to aberrant virion morphogenesis and enhances inflammatory cytokine expression in porcine macrophages. J Virol 96:e0166721. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01667-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Huang L, Liu H, Ye G, Liu X, Chen W, Wang Z, Zhao D, Zhang Z, Feng C, Hu L, Yu H, Zhou S, Zhang X, He X, Zheng J, Bu Z, Li J, Weng C, Jung JU. 2023. Deletion of African swine fever virus (ASFV) H240R gene attenuates the virulence of ASFV by enhancing NLRP3-mediated inflammatory responses. J Virol 97. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01227-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zhuo Y, Guo Z, Ba T, Zhang C, He L, Zeng C, Dai H. 2021. African swine fever virus MGF360-12L inhibits type I interferon production by blocking the interaction of importin alpha and NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Virol Sin 36:176–186. doi: 10.1007/s12250-020-00304-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Borca MV, O’Donnell V, Holinka LG, Ramírez-Medina E, Clark BA, Vuono EA, Berggren K, Alfano M, Carey LB, Richt JA, Risatti GR, Gladue DP. 2018. The L83L ORF of African swine fever virus strain Georgia encodes for a non-essential gene that interacts with the host protein IL-1beta. Virus Res 249:116–123. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2018.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Dixon LK, Chapman DAG, Netherton CL, Upton C. 2013. African swine fever virus replication and genomics. Virus Res 173:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Camacho A, Viñuela E. 1991. Protein p22 of African swine fever virus: an early structural protein that is incorporated into the membrane of infected cells. Virology 181:251–257. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90490-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Alejo A, Matamoros T, Guerra M, Andrés G. 2018. A proteomic atlas of the African swine fever virus particle. J Virol 92:e01293-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01293-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zhou P, Dai J, Zhang K, Wang T, Li L-F, Luo Y, Sun Y, Qiu H-J, Li S, Williams BRG. 2022. The H240R protein of African swine fever virus inhibits interleukin 1beta production by inhibiting NEMO expression and NLRP3 oligomerization. J Virol 96. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00954-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Li ZW, Chu W, Hu Y, Delhase M, Deerinck T, Ellisman M, Johnson R, Karin M. 1999. The IKKbeta subunit of IkappaB kinase (IKK) is essential for nuclear factor kappaB activation and prevention of apoptosis. J Exp Med 189:1839–1845. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.11.1839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Sakurai H, Chiba H, Miyoshi H, Sugita T, Toriumi W. 1999. IkappaB kinases phosphorylate NF-kappaB P65 subunit on serine 536 in the transactivation domain. J Biol Chem 274:30353–30356. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.43.30353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Perkins ND. 2006. Post-translational modifications regulating the activity and function of the nuclear factor kappa B pathway. Oncogene 25:6717–6730. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Israël A. 2010. The IKK complex, a central regulator of NF-kappaB activation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a000158. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Hu MM, Shu HB. 2020. Innate immune response to cytoplasmic DNA: mechanisms and diseases. Annu Rev Immunol 38:79–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-070119-115052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Wu J, Chen ZJ. 2014. Innate immune sensing and signaling of cytosolic nucleic acids. Annu Rev Immunol 32:461–488. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Yang Q, Shu HB. 2020. Deciphering the pathways to antiviral innate immunity and inflammation. Adv Immunol 145:1–36. doi: 10.1016/bs.ai.2019.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. 2006. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124:783–801. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Takeuchi O, Akira S. 2010. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 140:805–820. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Cackett G, Portugal R, Matelska D, Dixon L, Werner F. 2022. African swine fever virus and host response: transcriptome profiling of the Georgia 2007/1 strain and porcine macrophages. J Virol 96:e0193921. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01939-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Schoggins JW, MacDuff DA, Imanaka N, Gainey MD, Shrestha B, Eitson JL, Mar KB, Richardson RB, Ratushny AV, Litvak V, Dabelic R, Manicassamy B, Aitchison JD, Aderem A, Elliott RM, García-Sastre A, Racaniello V, Snijder EJ, Yokoyama WM, Diamond MS, Virgin HW, Rice CM. 2014. Pan-viral specificity of IFN-induced genes reveals new roles for cGAS in innate immunity. Nature 505:691–695. doi: 10.1038/nature12862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Li D, Yang W, Li L, Li P, Ma Z, Zhang J, Qi X, Ren J, Ru Y, Niu Q, Liu Z, Liu X, Zheng H. 2021. African swine fever virus MGF-505-7R negatively regulates cGAS-STING-mediated signaling pathway. J Immunol 206:1844–1857. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Li M, Shu HB. 2020. Dephosphorylation of cGAS by PPP6C impairs its substrate binding activity and innate antiviral response. Protein Cell 11:584–599. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00729-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. He WR, Cao LB, Yang YL, Hua D, Hu MM, Shu HB. 2021. VRK2 is involved in the innate antiviral response by promoting mitostress-induced mtDNA release. Cell Mol Immunol 18:1186–1196. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00673-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Liu ZS, Cai H, Xue W, Wang M, Xia T, Li WJ, Xing JQ, Zhao M, Huang YJ, Chen S, Wu SM, Wang X, Liu X, Pang X, Zhang ZY, Li T, Dai J, Dong F, Xia Q, Li AL, Zhou T, Liu ZG, Zhang XM, Li T. 2019. G3BP1 promotes DNA binding and activation of cGAS. Nat Immunol 20:18–28. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0262-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Chen H, Wang Z, Gao X, Lv J, Hu Y, Jung YS, Zhu S, Wu X, Qian Y, Dai J. 2022. ASFV pD345L protein negatively regulates NF-kappaB signalling by inhibiting IKK kinase activity. Vet Res 53:32. doi: 10.1186/s13567-022-01050-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Barnett KC, Coronas-Serna JM, Zhou W, Ernandes MJ, Cao A, Kranzusch PJ, Kagan JC. 2019. Phosphoinositide interactions position cGAS at the plasma membrane to ensure efficient distinction between self and viral DNA. Cell 176:1432–1446. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]