Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2023 Jul 17;131:182–195. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2023.07.007

An Alzheimer’s disease risk variant in TTC3 modifies the actin cytoskeleton organization and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway in iPSC-derived forebrain neurons

Holly N Cukier a,b,c, Carolina L Duarte a, Mayra J Laverde-Paz a, Shaina A Simon a, Derek J Van Booven a, Amanda T Miyares a,d, Patrice L Whitehead a, Kara L Hamilton-Nelson a, Larry D Adams a, Regina M Carney e, Michael L Cuccaro a,c, Jeffery M Vance a,b,c, Margaret A Pericak-Vance a,b,c, Anthony J Griswold a,c, Derek M Dykxhoorn a,c
PMCID: PMC10538380  NIHMSID: NIHMS1929634  PMID: 37677864

Abstract

A missense variant in the tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3 (TTC3) gene (rs377155188, p.S1038C, NM_003316.4:c.3113C>G) was found to segregate with disease in a multigenerational family with late onset Alzheimer’s disease. This variant was introduced into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from a cognitively intact individual using CRISPR genome editing and the resulting isogenic pair of iPSC lines were differentiated into cortical neurons. Transcriptome analysis showed an enrichment for genes involved in axon guidance, regulation of actin cytoskeleton, and GABAergic synapse. Functional analysis showed that the TTC3 p.S1038C iPSC-derived neuronal progenitor cells had altered 3D morphology and increased migration, while the corresponding neurons had longer neurites, increased branch points, and altered expression levels of synaptic proteins. Pharmacological treatment with small molecules that target the actin cytoskeleton could revert many of these cellular phenotypes, suggesting a central role for actin in mediating the cellular phenotypes associated with the TTC3 p.S1038C variant.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease (AD), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3 (TTC3) gene

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading form of dementia in older adults (Qiu et al., 2009). The underlying genetics contributing to AD are complex, with dozens of genes and loci being associated with disease through both family and population based studies (Lambert et al, 2013; Kunkle et al, 2019; Sims et al, 2020; Bellenguez et al, 2022). We previously identified the tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3 (TTC3) gene as a candidate contributing to AD risk (Kohli et al, 2016; Beecham, et al, 2018). A rare, nonsynonymous TTC3 variant, rs377155188, was the only alteration that segregated in all 11 AD individuals in a non-Hispanic white late onset AD (LOAD) family (mean age at onset = 75.7 years, Kohli et al, 2016). This alteration results in a missense change, p.S1038C, that is predicted to be deleterious and extremely rare in the gnomAD database (allele frequency=3.231x10−5). Thus, we hypothesized that this variant was contributing to the AD genetic burden in this LOAD family, and that TTC3 potentially plays a wider role in LOAD etiology. In addition to being involved in AD, it is possible that TTC3 plays a role in other dementias as well. Indeed, a patient with frontotemporal dementia was reported who carried a TTC3 p.V1893M alteration, along with an APOE ε4 allele and ADAM10 variant (Cochran, et al, 2019). The TTC3 gene is located on chromosome 21q22.2 in the Down syndrome critical region (DCR, Ohira et al, 1996; Tsukahara et al, 1996). It encodes a 2025 amino acid protein that contains four tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domains in the amino terminus, followed by a potential coiled-coil domain, Citron binding region, and a carboxy terminal E3 ubiquitin ligase (E3) ring finger domain (Tsukahara et al, 1996).

Additional evidence supports the role of TTC3 in AD pathogenesis. While TTC3 is ubiquitously expressed, it has been shown to have elevated levels in the brain (Rachidi, et al, 2000; Fagerberg, et al, 2014). Studies reported that cortical TTC3 expression is reduced in LOAD patients and negatively correlated with AD neuropathology (Webster et al, 2009; Zhang et al, 2013). TTC3 interacts with and mediates the ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of multiple target proteins, including heat shock proteins, polymerase gamma (POLG), and AKT. Phosphorylated AKT (AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3) is a primary target of TTC3 (Suizu et al, 2009; Kim et al, 2019). The E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of TTC3 is dependent on its phosphorylation by AKT, thus creating a negative feedback loop (Suizu et al, 2009). The serine-threonine kinase AKT plays a crucial role in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT pathway, which is activated by a wide variety of cellular signals to regulate multiple fundamental cellular processes, including cellular proliferation, survival, cell cycle arrest, cytoskeletal organization, vesicle trafficking, migration, and glucose transport, among others (Manning and Toker, 2017). Disruption of the PI3-K/Akt/mTOR pathway has been implicated in AD (O’ Neill, 2013). Additionally, TTC3 was shown to be upregulated in neurons from mice in which the ribosome quality control pathway gene, listerin E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (Ltn1), had been deleted (Endo et al, 2023). These Ltn1 knockout mice showed cognitive deficits that could be restored by the silencing of TTC3.

To understand the breadth of pathways impacted by a rare AD associated variant in TTC3 (p.S1038C), isogenic iPSC lines that either carry or lack the TTC3 p.S1038C variant were derived and differentiated into forebrain neurons (Laverde-Paz et al, 2021). Transcriptome analysis (RNA-seq) of day 70 iPSC-derived neurons showed an alteration in the expression of established AD risk genes (BACE1, A2M, INPP5F, and UNC5C) as well as genes located in AD GWAS loci (ADAMTS1, MAF, and NCK2). The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the TTC3 p.S1038C variant bearing and the isogenic parental iPSC-derived neurons showed an enrichment for KEGG pathways associated with focal adhesion, PI3K-Akt signalling, axon guidance, regulation of actin cytoskeleton, and GABAergic synapse. Previous studies had shown that the silencing of TTC3 expression led to increased neurite growth, while overexpression of TTC3 inhibited neurite extension and interfered with the compactness of Golgi (Berto et al, 2007; Berto et al, 2014). The TTC3 p.S1038C early neurons (D30) showed increased neurite length and branch points, similar to the phenotype that was previously reported upon TTC3 silencing. Treatment of the neurons with the selective actin polymerization inhibitor Cytochalasin D led to the reduction of neurite length and neurite branch point number in the variant-bearing neurons to levels similar to those seen in the control neurons. TTC3 p.S1038C bearing neuronal progenitor cells (NPCs) exhibited increased migration that was also ameliorated by Cytochalasin D treatment, suggesting that aberrations in the actin cytoskeleton may be driving TTC3 p.S1038C mediated neuronal irregularities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Derivation of iPSCs into Forebrain Neurons

The isogenic set of iPSCs with the homozygous p.S1038C change, TTC3 clone 50 (UMi028-A-2), and the unedited parental line were both differentiated into forebrain neurons (Laverde-Paz et al, 2021). To begin, the iPSC lines were grown in mTeSR1 medium (STEMCELL Technologies, #85850) on plates coated in Matrigel hESC-Qualified Matrix (Corning, #354277) and passaged with Gentle Cell Dissociation Reagent (STEMCELL Technologies, #100-0485). To initiate differentiation and the formation of embryoid bodies on day 0, the iPSCs were washed with PBS and dissociated into single cells with Accutase (STEMCELL Technologies, #07920), filtered with a 40 μm cell strainer to remove any clumps, and counted. The iPSCs were resuspended in STEMdiff Neural Induction Medium with the SMADi Neural Induction Supplement (STEMCELL Technologies, #08581), and 10 μm Y-27623 (Biogems, #1293823) at a concentration of 3x106 cells/mL. iPSCs were plated into AggreWell800 Microwell Plates (STEMCELL Technologies, #34811) with approximately 3x106 cells/well or 10,000 cells/microwell, spun down at 100 x g for 3 minutes, and incubated at 37°C. The media in the AggreWells was partially changed (3/4 replaced) for days 1-4. On day 5, the embryoid bodies were dislodged from each AggreWell using a wide-bore P1000 tip with DMEM/F12 (Gibco/ThermoFisher Scientific, #11320033) filtered with a 40 μm cell strainer to remove single cells, replated onto 1 well of a 6 well plate in STEMdiff Neural Induction Medium with the SMADi Neural Induction Supplement and 10 μm Y-27623, and incubated at 37°C. For days 6-11, full media changes were performed. On day 12, the cells were washed with DMEM/F12 and then incubated for ~1.5 hours with 1 mL of STEMdiff Neural Rosette Selection Reagent (STEMCELL Technologies, #05832) in each well. Neural rosette clusters were then dislodged, resuspended in STEMdiff Neural Induction Medium with the SMADi Neural Induction Supplement and 10 μm Y-27623, and replated onto Matrigel. Cells were maintained in STEMdiff Neural Induction Medium with the SMADi Neural Induction Supplement for days 12-19 and passaged as required, at about 90% confluency. On days 20-29, the cells were grown using the daily medium changes of STEMdiff Forebrain Neuron Differentiation kit (STEMCELL Technologies, #08600) and then transitioned to the STEMdiff Forebrain Neuron Maturation kit (STEMCELL Technologies, #08605) for days 30-70 with full medium changes every 2-3 days. For cytoskeleton rearrangement assays, the culture media was supplemented with 1 μM Cytochalasin D (Cayman Chemical, #11330), 10 nM Jasplakinolide (Cayman Chemical, # 11705) or 20 μM Y27632 (Biogems, # 1293823) and cells were cultured for 24 hrs with the supplemented medium. All were reconstituted in DMSO and the final concentration of DMSO in the culture media was between 0.2% to 0.05%.

2.2. Immunocytochemistry (ICC)

Cells were grown in coated 8-well chamber slides or black wall optical bottom 96-well plates and cultured in modified media as described above. Cell monolayers were washed with PBS, fixed and permeabilized using the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Fixation/Permeabilization Solution Kit (BD Bioscience, #BD554715) following the manufacturer’s recommendations and incubated in blocking buffer for 1hr. Following blocking, the primary antibodies were added [Recombinant Anti-PAX6 antibody [EPR15858] (Abcam, # ab195045), Human/Mouse/Rat SOX1 Antibody (R&D Systems, # AF3369), Purified anti-Tubulin β-3 (TUBB3) Antibody 1:1000 (Biolegend, # PRB-435P), Anti-MAP2 antibody 1:1000 (Abcam, # ab5392), Monoclonal Anti-Synaptophysin 1:200 (Sigma Aldrich, # S5768), Recombinant Anti-Synapsin I antibody [EPR23531-50] 1:200 (Abcam, # ab254349), TTC3 Polyclonal Antibody 1:200 (Abcam, ab80061)] and samples incubated overnight at 4°C. The cells were washed with PBS and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody in blocking buffer for 1 hour (donkey anti-rabbit IgG AF594 1:500, goat anti-chicken IgY AF647 1:500, goat anti-mouse IgG AF488 1:500). Phalloidin FITC Conjugate 1:1000 (Abcam, #ab235137) was added along with the secondary antibodies and incubated for 1 hour for the appropriate wells. Finally, the cells were washed with PBS and incubated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 10 minutes and, either mounted or stored in PBS prior to imaging. The stained cells were visualized using the Zeiss Axio Observer Z.1 Confocal Microscope with Spinning Disk and images analysed with Zen 2 Blue Edition (Carl Zeiss) or the EVOS FL Auto 2 Imaging System (Invitrogen) and images analysed using Celleste Image Analysis Software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For the cytoskeleton rearrangement assays, the cells were imaged in the ArrayScan XTI (Thermo Scientific) and analysed using the Cellomics Morphology Explorer V4 in HCS Studio (Thermo Scientific).

2.3. Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)

Cells were collected at day 0, day 30, and day 70 and stored in RNAprotect (Qiagen, #76106) at −20°C. To extract the RNA, the samples were thawed and processed using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Cat #74104) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cell lysates were homogenized using QIAshredder spin columns (Qiagen, Cat #79656) and genomic DNA was removed by an on-column DNase treatment (Qiagen, Cat #79254). 500 ng of total RNA was used for each sample for reverse transcription (RT) into cDNA using the iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix for RT-qPCR (Bio-Rad, #1708840). RNA expression levels for TTC3 (Hs01598175_m1) and GAPDH (Hs99999905_m1) were measured in triplicate using TaqMan Gene Expression assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on the QuantStudio 12 k Flex Real-Time PCR system machine.

2.4. Western blot analysis

Cells were lysed at day 0, day 30, and day 70 in RIPA Lysis and Extraction Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat # 89901) supplemented with Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail, EDTA-Free (100X, Thermo Scientific, Cat# 78441). The lysates were denatured, separated in 4–15% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX Precast Protein Gels (Bio-Rad, # 4561084DC) and transferred to a membrane in a Trans-Blot® Turbo Mini PVDF Transfer Pack (Bio-Rad, Cat# 1704156EDU). The membrane was blocked 1 hr with 5% Blotting Grade Blocker Non-Fat Dry Milk (Bio-Rad, Cat# 1706404XTU) and incubated overnight with the primary antibodies [TTC3 Polyclonal Antibody (Abcam, # AB80061), Recombinant Anti-AKT1 + AKT2 + AKT3 antibody [EPR16798] (Abcam, # AB179463), Recombinant Anti-AKT1 + AKT2 + AKT3 (phospho S472 + S473 + S474, Purified anti-Tubulin β-3 (TUBB3) Antibody 1:1000 (Biolegend, # PRB-435P), anti-GAPDH antibody 1:1000 (Sigma Aldrich, #SAB1405848), Monoclonal Anti-Synaptophysin 1:200 (Sigma Aldrich, # S5768), Recombinant Anti-Synapsin I antibody [EPR23531-50] 1:200 (Abcam, # ab254349),) antibody [EPR18853], (Abcam, # AB192623)] in blocking buffer. The cells were incubated with HRP-linked secondary antibodies, and the protein bands were detected using the chemiluminescent Clarity Max Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad, Cat# 1705062S). The bands were visualized in the ChemiDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad) and quantified in ImageLab 6.0.1 (Bio-Rad).

2.5. Neurite Tracking/Neurogenesis

Cells were grown in PLO/laminin coated 96-well plates, cultured in modified media as described above, and imaged live using the IncuCyte® Zoom system for automated live cell analysis (Sartorius). Time-lapse images were acquired every six hours. The growth rate of neurites in each well was obtained by measuring the length of neurites that extend from the cell bodies expressed as neurite length/surface area (mm/mm2), and the intersection of two masked neurites in an image expressed as branch points/cell body cluster count (1/cell body cluster).

2.6. Cell Migration

A monolayer scratch assay was performed on a 96-well Essen ImageLock plate (Sartorius) using the IncuCyte® WoundMaker Tool (Sartorius) and cells were imaged live every 6 hours using the IncuCyte® ZOO system for automated live cell analysis (Sartorius). Wound closure was analysed by measuring the spatial cell density in the wound area relative to the spatial cell density outside of the wound expressed as the Relative Wound Density (%) and the confluence of cells within the wound region expressed as Wound Confluence (%).

2.7. Chemotaxis Assay

Chemotaxis was assessed using a PLO/laminin coated μ-Slide Chemotaxis (iBidi, #80236) following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol and using 500μM Dibutyryl-cAMP (Stemcell Technologies, #73882) as the chemotactic agent. The EVOS FL Auto 2 Imaging System (Invitrogen) was used for time lapse image acquisition and cell tracking was performed using the FastTrack AI image analysis software (MetaVi Labs).

2.8. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and analysis

The RNA samples used for quantitative RT-PCR were the same used for the transcriptomic analysis. The concentration and quality of RNA samples from day 70 was assessed using a Bioanalyzer RNA kit (Agilent Technologies). Total RNA was prepped with the NuGEN Universal with AnyDeplete Human Ribo kit from ~100 ng of total RNA input. Libraries were sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000, yielding a minimum of 35 million reads/sample. Raw FASTQs were processed by a bioinformatics pipeline including adapter trimming by TrimGalore (v0.6.1) (https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore), alignment with the STAR alignerv2.5.0a to the GRCh38 human reference, and gene counts quanitified against the GENCODEv35 gene annotation release using the GeneCounts module implemented in STAR.

Differential expression analysis was conducted using edgeR with a false discovery rate (FDR) cut-off of 0.05 to correct for the multiple comparison testing and fold change (FC) of +/− 1.25 (Robinson et al, 2010). Pathway enrichment with differentially expressed protein coding genes was performed using the clusterProfiler package (v4.4.4) which supports the latest online version of KEGG data from the KEGG website (Yu et al, 2012; Chen et al, 2013).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Two means were compared using the Student’s t-test (unpaired, two tailed). Three or more means were analysed by one-way or two-way analysis of variance, followed by Dunnett’s test for pairwise comparisons. Time lapse assays were analysed using repeated measures analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s test for pairwise comparisons or by Mann-Whitney test for frequencies and ratios. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. iPSC-derived neurons bearing the TTC3 variant showed differences in known and novel AD genes compared to the isogenic unedited neurons

Global transcriptional analysis of day 70 neurons demonstrated a wide range of differentially expressed genes, including those previously implicated in AD, as well as novel genes. 978 protein coding genes were differentially expressed (FDR<0.05, FC +/−1.25) between the isogenic cells with and without the TTC3 alteration (Table 1, Supplemental Table 1). The volcano plot show the 381 upregulated and 597 down regulated genes and the heat map also demonstrate that there is a distinct transcriptional profile between the edited and unedited neurons (Fig. 1A). Hierarchal clustering demonstrated that the neurons derived from the edited and unedited cells are distinct from each other (Fig. 1B). In addition, the TTC3 p.S1038C variant-bearing neurons showed a − 1.31-fold change (FDR=8.70x10−9) in TTC3 expression compared to the unedited cell line. This reduction in TTC3 expression was confirmed by qRT-PCR analysis on day 70, as well as iPSC and day 30 neuronal progenitor cells (NPCs) (Supplemental Fig. 1A). Immunoblot analysis confirmed this decrease at the protein level (Supplementary Fig. 1B).

Table 1.

Top 20 significantly differentially expressed genes

Gene
name
Symbol Location logFC FC PValue FDR log10F
DR
NNAT ENSG00000053438.11 chr20:37521206-37523690 −6.480032644 −89.26561445 1.07E-176 6.51E-172 −171.19
TCEAL2 ENSG00000184905.9 chrX:102125679-102140426 −4.29672565 −19.6536539 2.25E-167 6.82E-163 −162.17
TFPI2 ENSG00000105825.14 chr7:93885396-93890753 −1.618804143 −3.071203571 1.13E-132 2.28E-128 −127.64
FN1 ENSG00000115414.20 chr2:215360440-215436073 −1.72222813 −3.299455889 2.58E-125 3.92E-121 −120.41
A2M ENSG00000175899.15 chr12:9067664-9116229 −2.014808053 −4.041268069 1.74E-116 2.11E-112 −111.68
COL1A2 ENSG00000164692.18 chr7:94394895-94431227 −1.478689906 −2.786955383 1.19E-103 1.21E-99 −98.92
CBR1 ENSG00000159228.13 chr21:36069941-36073166 −8.269245949 −308.5255051 8.27E-96 7.17E-92 −91.14
CPLX1 ENSG00000168993.15 chr4:784957-826129 2.134272132 4.390155 776 2.27E-94 1.72E-90 −89.77
CCN2 ENSG00000118523.6 chr6:131948176-131951372 −1.372359026 −2.588935506 1.73E-87 1.17E-83 −82.93
CRABP1 ENSG00000166426.8 chr15:78340353-78348225 1.264264 961 2.402047 967 2.49E-64 1.51E-60 −59.82
SV2C ENSG00000122012.14 chr5:76083383-76353939 −1.364726518 −2.575275035 1.30E-63 7.15E-60 −59.15
DLK1 ENSG00000185559.16 chr14:100725705-100738224 −0.799767597 −1.740820676 4.97E-61 2.51E-57 −56.60
FBLN5 ENSG00000140092.14 chr14:91869412-91947987 −0.99057515 −1.986976969 9.20E-59 4.29E-55 −54.37
AHNAK ENSG00000124942.14 chr11:62433542-62556235 −1.057266353 −2.080984692 4.90E-58 2.12E-54 −53.67
ZIC1 ENSG00000152977.10 chr3:147393422-147510293 −1.356075147 −2.559878163 4.15E-57 1.68E-53 −52.78
NKX6-2 ENSG00000148826.9 chr10:132783179-132786147 −1.471257893 −2.772635357 2.53E-56 9.60E-53 −52.02
GPC3 ENSG00000147257.15 chrX:133535745-133985594 −2.157511284 −4.461445711 3.21E-56 1.15E-52 −51.94
PLEKHG 4B ENSG00000153 404.14 chr5:92151-189972 −1.129323559 −2.187561473 2.80E-54 9.43E-51 −50.03
WNT2B ENSG00000134245.18 chr1:112466541-112530165 −2.950805804 −7.731807953 7.13E-49 2.28E-45 −44.64
GABBR2 ENSG00000136928.7 chr9:98288109-98708935 −0.944457823 −1.924465519 8.59E-49 2.60E-45 −44.58

Figure 1. Transcriptional analysis of day 70 neurons.

Figure 1.

A. Volcano plot of the 381 upregulated and 597 down regulated genes that were significant between the neurons with and without the TTC3 alteration. Genes marked in red have a FDR < 0.05 and FC +/−1.25. B. Heat map of the 978 significantly differentially expressed genes with a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and fold change (FC) +/−1.25 C. KEGG pathway analysis showing cellular functions overrepresented in the DEGs from the parental compared to TTC3 p.S1038C derived neurons.

Significant differentially expressed genes were also overlaid with known AD genes and loci (Lambert, et al, 2013, Kunkle, et al, 2019, Bellenguez, et al, 2022). Although no overall enrichment was seen for AD GWAS genes, four of the significantly differentially expressed genes identified in this study have been previously implicated in AD: beta-secretase 1 (BACE1), alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2M), unc-5 netrin receptor C (UNC5C) and inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase F (INPP5F, Wetzel-Smith, et al, 2014, Jiao, et al, 2014, Korvatska, et al, 2015, Xue, et al, 2022). Differential expression was identified for BACE1 with an increase of 1.28-fold change in the TTC3 variant-bearing neurons compared to the control neurons (FDR=2.39x10−4, Supplemental Table 1). BACE1 is one of the first genes found to cause AD (Vassar, et al, 1999). BACE1 encodes for a secretase that cleaves the amyloid precursor protein (APP), which is the product from which beta amyloid fragments are generated. A2M encodes a pan-protease inhibitor and chaperone that is involved in innate immunity which can clear and degrade amyloid beta and has been suggested to be a preclinical marker of AD (Blacker, et al, 1998, Varma, et al, 2017). More recently, studies identified numerous rare UNC5C alterations that segregate with disease in LOAD families, as well as a broader association with four large case-control datasets (Wetzel-Smith, et al, 2014, Jiao, et al, 2014, Korvatska, et al, 2015). In addition, imaging studies have demonstrated that polymorphisms in UNC5C can influence cognition over time, as well as the volume and atrophy rate of key brain regions, including the hippocampus, middle temporal, and precuneus areas (Sun, et al, 2015, Yang, et al, 2019). INPP5F was also associated with AD, in addition to being connected to Parkinson’s Disease (Nalls, et al, 2014, Blauwendraat, et al, 2019, Xue, et al, 2022). Moreover, INPP5F is in the same gene family as INPP5D, a significant AD GWAS locus (Kunkle, et al, 2019, Bellenguez, et al, 2022).

In addition, three genes located within established genome wide association study (GWAS) regions were found to be differentially regulated: ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 1 (ADAMTS1), MAF bZIP transcription factor (MAF), and NCK adaptor protein 2 (NCK2, Supplemental Table 1, Kunkle, et al, 2019, Schwartzentruber, et al, 2021, Bellenguez, et al, 2022). ADAMTS1 has been shown to be upregulated in the brains of AD patients and has been specifically connected to both brain amyloidosis and neurodegeneration (Ferrando Miguel, et al, 2005, Medoro, et al, 2019, Tan, et al, 2021). Variants in MAF have also been associated with limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathological changes (LATE-NC), a type of dementia similar to AD (Nelson, et al, 2019, Dugan, et al, 2022). Intriguingly, NCK2 has been shown to be involved in actin cytoskeleton dynamics as well as vascular remodeling (Rohatgi, et al, 2001, Alfaidi, et al, 2021)

Additionally, some of the most significantly differentially expressed genes have already been shown to be critical for neuronal function. Neuronatin (NNAT) was the most significant differentially expressed gene (FDR=6.51x10−176) and was strongly downregulated in the edited neurons (FC=−89.3). NNAT is an imprinted gene that encodes a proteolipid critical during brain development to regulate ion channels and can act in an anti-inflammatory manner (Joseph, et al, 1995, Oyang, et al, 2011, Ka, et al, 2017). Complexin 1 (CPLX1, FDR=1.72x10−90, FC=4.4), the highest gene that was upregulated in the edited neurons, encodes a protein involved in synaptic vesicle exocytosis and was previously shown to influence cognitive decline in humans, as well it was shown to be differentially expressed in a mouse AD model (Chang, et al, 2015, Ramons-Miguel, et al, 2018, Jesko, et al, 2021). Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2C (SV2C, FDR=7.15x10−60, FC=−2.6) encodes a synaptic vesicle protein involved in dopamine regulation and is altered in post-mortem tissue from patients with Parkinson’s disease (Dunn, et al, 2017, Stout, et al, 2019). SV2C has a relatively narrow expression in dopaminergic neurons, and some GABAergic and cholinergic neurons (Dardou, et al, 2011). Intriguingly, the closely related paralogs SV2A and SV2B both have altered expression in other AD models, with SV2B specifically being upregulated in the presence of Aβ42, reviewed by Bartholome, et al, 2017 (Heese, et al, 2001, Gomez Ravetti, et al, 2010, Stockburger, et al, 2016, Chen, et al, 2018).

3.2. Pathway analysis demonstrated alterations in multiple pathways

KEGG pathway analysis of the 979 significantly differentially regulated genes identified 23 pathways with an adjusted P-value < 0.05 (Fig. 1C, Table 2). This includes the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway, in which TTC3 has been previously implicated (adjusted p=7.99x10-5), as well as the axon guidance pathway, the regulation of actin cytoskeleton pathway, the GABAergic synapse pathway, and the Wnt signalling pathway (Fig. 1C). 39 genes in the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway, or 11% of the 354 genes recognized by KEGG, were significantly differentially expressed. Moreover, the most differentially expressed gene, C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 11 (CXCL11, FDR=4.08x10−15, FC=−1187), encodes a pro-inflammatory chemokine that depends on the AKT pathway (Callahan, et al, 2021). AKT signalling has been associated with a wide variety of cellular phenotypes from proliferation and cell cycle progression to cell survival. metabolism, and actin reorganization (Franke 2008). In neurons, AKT signalling has been shown to be important for protection against trophic factor deprivation, ischemic injury, and oxidative stress (Dudek et al, 1997; Salinas et al, 2001; Noshita et al, 2002). Dysregulation of AKT signalling has also been observed in Alzheimer disease with multiple possible means of action being suggested, including alteration to GSK3β signalling and Tau phosphorylation, to the response to insulin and induction of neuroinflammation (Rickle et al, 2004; Ryder et al, 2004; Wang et al, 2018; Hoyer 2002; van der Heide et al, 2005; Chiu et al, 2008; Capiralla et al, 2012). In fact, many of the pathways identified in our transcriptome analysis can be related back to AKT signalling.

Table 2.

Significant KEGG pathways and genes

Term Overlap P-value Adjusted P-
value
Odds Ratio
Focal adhesion 45/201 4.62E-18 1.32E-15 5.832921098
ECM-receptor interaction 27/88 5.53E-15 7.91E-13 8.824998707
Amoebiasis 24/102 9.43E-11 8.99E-09 6.109982261
Proteoglycans in cancer 28/205 8.68E-07 5.53E-05 3.138031519
Human papillomavirus infection 38/331 9.67E-07 5.53E-05 2.584060707
AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications 18/100 1.50E-06 7.17E-05 4.330792683
PI3K-Akt signaling pathway 39/354 1.96E-06 7.99E-05 2.466565242
Axon guidance 25/182 2.98E-06 1.06E-04 3.152131051
Small cell lung cancer 16/92 9.01E-06 2.82E-04 4.146186673
Protein digestion and absorption 17/103 9.86E-06 2.82E-04 3.895070542
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy 14/77 1.92E-05 4.99E-04 4.370447211
Morphine addiction 15/91 3.30E-05 7.86E-04 3.883013609
Regulation of actin cytoskeleton 24/218 1.79E-04 0.003772994 2.441548337
Relaxin signaling pathway 17/129 1.85E-04 0.003772994 2.986751152
GABAergic synapse 13/89 3.76E-04 0.007173163 3.358303791
Dilated cardiomyopathy 13/96 7.89E-04 0.014097705 3.0739372
Hippo signaling pathway 18/163 0.001059654 0.017827118 2.440991379
Wnt signaling pathway 18/166 0.001307032 0.020767286 2.391131757
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 12/90 0.001420274 0.02137886 3.01704093
Tight junction 18/169 0.001601787 0.022905551 2.343253311
TGF-beta signaling pathway 12/94 0.002072614 0.028227031 2.869262233
Adherens junction 10/71 0.002291585 0.029790608 3.21111638
Complement and coagulation cascades 11/85 0.002809557 0.034936235 2.912714162

3.3. Migration and chemotaxis are altered in TTC3 p.S1038C variant bearing neuronal progenitor cells compared to control NPCs

TTC3 activates the RhoA-PIIA actin polymerization and stabilization pathway that can alter NPC migration (Berto et al, 2007, Berto, et al, 2014). Therefore, actin cytoskeleton irregularities can be expected in cases of TTC3 mutation. To test cell migration, we performed wound healing assays on neuronal progenitor cells (NPCs) from the TTC3 p.S1038C and isogenic control lines. In day 30 NPCs, cell cultures with the TTC3 variant were able to recover more quickly from a scratch wound than unedited NPCs (Fig. 2 A-C). This was shown from the higher relative wound density (i.e. faster closing of the wound) as measured by time lapse imaging on the Incucyte® Zoom (Sartorius, Fig. 2B). In addition, the relative wound confluence (a measure of cell confluence in the wound area) was found to be modestly, but statistically significantly, higher in the TTC3 S.1038C variant bearing compared to the control NPCs (Fig. 2C). Migration of the NPCs towards a chemoattractant (Dibutyryl cyclic AMP (DBcAMP)) was assessed using a μ-Slide Chemotaxis assay (iBiDi). Consistent with the wound healing assay, NPCs bearing the p.S1038C variant had faster speed (as measured by the total distance travelled over time) and velocity (as measured by the vectorial cell displacement over time) compared to the isogenic control NPCs (Fig. 2F-H). There appeared to be no difference in the directionality of the migration since both the p.S1038C variant bearing and control NPCs migrated towards the chemoattractant; however, stronger chemotaxis was observed in the p.S1038C variant bearing NPCs as measured by the forward migration index values. The forward migration index on the X-axis represents the lateral displacement of cell movement that is not directed to the region of higher chemoattractant concentration. Therefore, the lower forward migration index on the X-axis seen on the p.S1038C variant bearing NPCs represents a stronger response to the chemoattractant and less lateral displacement during movement as evidenced in the endpoint tracking diagram (Fig. 2D,E). The morphometric analysis of phallodin-stained day 30 NPCs bearing the TTC3 p.S1038C variant showed an increase in the 3D structure of the cells as measured by the oblate and prolate volumes (Fig. 2G,H) compared to the unedited control NPCs while no differences in object entropy intensity or fiber length or width was observed (Fig. 2G,H).

Figure 2. Neuronal Precursor Cell Migration and Cytoskeleton Assessment.

Figure 2.

A-C. Scratch wound assay on D30 neuron precursor cells recording cell migration for three days. Migration rate was measured as the wound area relative to the spatial cell density outside of the wound (Wound Density) and the confluence of cells within the wound region (Wound Confluence). Scale Bars: 300 μm. D-E. Endpoint tracking of migrating cells using the μ-Slide Chemotaxis assay. The start point for each tracked cell is located in the center of the diagram and the vectorial displacement is delineated in the direction of movement. The Y-axis represents movement along the chemoattractant gradient, which is higher towards the top of the diagram, and the X-axis represents movement perpendicular to the chemoattractant gradient. F. Chemotaxis analysis. G. Representative images of D30 neurons. Blue: Nuclear counterstain DAPI, Green: Actin filament stain Phalloidin, Scale Bars: 125 μm. H. Immunofluorescent assessment of actin filament organization and cytoskeleton pattern analysis of D30 neurons. Ch1: Phalloidin. *: p-value<0.05, **: p-value<0.01, ***: p-value<0.001, ****: p-value<0.0001

3.4. Neurite length and number of branch points were elevated in the TTC3 p.S1038C variant bearing neurons compared to the control neurons

Similar morphometric analysis was performed on the day 70 neurons. Unlike the NPCs, the TTC3 p.S1038C variant bearing neurons showed no statistically significant differences in the 3D structure of the cell bodies (i,.e. no difference in the oblate or prolate volume). However, the TTC3 p.S1038C variant bearing neurons had higher entropy of the actin microfilaments (as measured by Phalloidin staining, Fig. 3A,B, Ch1) and microtubules (as measured by TUBB3 staining, Fig. 3A,B, Ch3) compared to the control unedited neurons. These results suggest that the ultrastructural organization of the neuronal cytoskeleton is affected by the TTC3 mutation and aligns with previous reports of TTC3 silencing (Berto et al, 2014).

Figure 3. iPSC-Derived Neuron Cytoskeleton Assessment and Neurite Formation.

Figure 3.

A. Representative images of D70 neurons. Blue: Nuclear counterstain DAPI, Green: Actin filament stain Phalloidin, Red: β-tubulin 3 (TUBB3). Scale Bars: 125 μm C-F. Immunofluorescent assessment of actin filament organization and cytoskeleton pattern analysis of D70 neurons Ch1: Phalloidin, Ch3: TUBB3. C-E. Representative images and quantification of neurite formation recorded from D30 to D35 and presented as neurite length per surface area. The intersection of two masked neurites in an image is presented as branch points/cell body cluster count. Scale Bars: 150 μm. *: p-value<0.05, **: p-value<0.01, ***: p-value<0.001, ****: p-value<0.0001

The transcriptome analysis highlighted differences in axon guidance. In addition, there is evidence that shows that modulation of TTC3 affects neurite growth (Berto et al, 2007; Berto et al, 2014). Therefore, morphological measures of neurite growth and branching were assessed in differentiating neuronal cultures using live cell imaging on the Incucyte® Zoom (Sartorius). The TTC3 p.S1038C variant bearing neurons had increased neurite length (Fig. 3D), which phenocopies previous studies in which TTC3 expression was silenced in rat hippocampal neurons using small interfering RNAs (siRNAs, Berto et al, 2007, Berto, et al, 2014). In addition, the edited neurons had significantly more branch points/cell body than the isogenic control neurons (Fig. 3E). Interestingly, the cell body clusters formed in the edited cells were less voluminous than those observed in control cells, with more single cells developing neurites and neuron-to-neuron connections (Fig. 3C).

Defects in neurite outgrowth and branching could affect the transport of molecules down the axon to the synapses. The transcriptome analysis also showed an enrichment for differentially expressed genes corresponding to “GABAergic synapse”. Therefore, we examined the levels of expression of Synapsin 1 (SYN1) and Synaptophysin (SYP). Interestingly, the TTC3 p.S1038C variant bearing neurons had increased expression of SYN1, while the level of SYP was decreased in these same cells compared to the isogenic control neurons (Fig. 4A-G). This dysregulation of synaptic protein expression may affect vesicle transport, fusion, and recycling in TTC3 p.S1038C neurons. SYN1 is a synaptic vesicle marker that can directly bind to PIIA (Witke et al, 1998), and both proteins have been associated with synaptic vesicle traffic and endocytic assembly (Witke et al, 1998; Shah and Rossie, 2018). Similarly, SYP, an integral membrane protein found in presynaptic vesicles, is associated with presynaptic vesicle trafficking, and is believed to play a role in pore complex formation during vesicle fusion (Thiel, 1993; Rao et al, 2017). Furthermore, SYP concentration in neurons is reduced during aging and, more remarkably, in AD (Hamos et al, 1989; Masliah and Terry, 1993).

Figure 4. Markers of Neuronal Differentiation and Synaptic Vesicle Formation.

Figure 4.

A-C. Immunofluorescent detection of markers of neuronal differentiation on D70 neurons. Scale Bars A & C: 10 μm. Scale Bars B: 20 μm. D-G. Western blot analysis and quantification of the expression of β-tubulin 3 and synaptic vesicle markers Synapsin 1 and Synaptophysin. β-tubulin 3 (TUBB3), Microtubule Associated Protein 2 (MAP2), Synapsin 1 (SYN1) and Synaptophysin (SYP). *: p-value<0.05, **: p-value<0.01, ***: p-value<0.001, ****: p-value<0.0001

3.5. Differences in NPC migration and neuronal outgrowth seen in the TTC3 p.S1038C variant bearing cells could be modulated by small molecules that alter the stability of the actin cytoskeleton

The phenotypes identified with the NPCs (morphology and migration) and the neurons (morphology, neurite outgrowth, and branch point number) from the TTC3 p.S1038C variant bearing iPSC can all be connected through the modulation of actin stability. Therefore, we tested the effect of several small molecules that are known to affect actin polymerization, either directly by interacting with actin or by targeting the upstream regulator of actin polymerization, Rho Associated Coiled-Coil Containing Protein (ROCK). Cytochalasin D (CytoD) is a potent inhibitor of actin polymerization which binds to the F-actin polymer and preventing the addition of actin monomers, as well as disrupting the microfilament network organization (Schliwa, 1982). Jasplakinolide (Jaspla) is an actin filament polymerizing and stabilizing small molecule, that can also contribute to neurite extension and microtubule plasticity in dendrites (Holzinger, 2001). Finally, Y27362 is a selective and potent inhibitor of ROCK1 and ROCK2 that contributes to actin cytoskeleton stabilization and neuritogenesis (Da Silva, et al, 2003; Shi et al, 2013).

The cytoskeletal characteristics that were previously found to be significantly different between unedited and TTC3 NPCs and neurons (Fig. 2C,D; Fig. 3A,B) were assessed after treatment with CytoD, Jaspla or Y27632. Microscopic assessment of the cytoskeleton of edited and unedited cells after treatment with CytoD showed dramatic actin bundling and cytoskeleton collapse; thus, CytoD treatment could disrupt the three-dimensional cell volume (prolate and oblate volume) in day 30 NPCs derived from both the TTC3 p.S1038C variant bearing and isogenic control iPSCs (Fig. 5A,C,D). Microscopic assessment of the Jaspla treated TTC3 mutants showed improved cytoskeleton organization that approximated the morphological characteristics of control cells (Fig. 5A,C,D). Although the treatment with Jaspla improved the morphology of the day 30 TTC3 variant bearing NPCs, it had no effect on the microtubule entropy (as measured by TUBB3 staining, Ch3) of the day 70 TTC3 variant bearing neurons (Fig.5B,E,F). On the other hand, Jaspla treatment of the isogenic control D70 neurons had a statistically significant increase in microtubule entropy (Ch3) so that they resemble the TTC3 variant bearing neurons (Fig. 5B,F). Although Y27632 treatment had no significant effect on the TTC3 variant bearing neurons, it showed a statistically significant increase in both the actin filament entropy (phallodin staining, Ch1) and microtubule entropy (TUBB3 staining, Ch3) of the unedited neurons so that they more closely resemble the TTC3 variant bearing neurons. No difference from the untreated NPCs were seen with the TTC3 variant bearing and control NPCs treated with Y27632 (Fig. 5A,C,D).

Figure 5. Cytoskeleton Rearrangement Assay of Neuronal Precursor Cells and iPSC-Derived Neurons.

Figure 5.

A. Representative images of D30 neuron progenitor cells. Blue: Nuclear counterstain DAPI, Green: Actin filament stain Phalloidin. Scale Bars: 125 μm B. Representative images of D70 neurons. Blue: Nuclear counterstain DAPI, Green: Actin filament stain Phalloidin, Red: β-tubulin 3. Scale Bars: 125 μm C-D. Comparison of cytoskeleton characteristics that were significantly different between D30 (C-D) and D70 (E-F) TTC3 pS1038C cells and unedited cells after treatment with Cytochalasin D (CytoD), Jasplakinolide (Jaspla) and Y27632. Ch1: Phalloidin, Ch3: β-tubulin 3. *: p-value<0.05, ***: p-value<0.001.

We next tested the impact of modulating the stability of the actin cytoskeleton on NPC migration (Fig. 6A-E) and neurite branching and outgrowth (Fig. 6F-H). The treatment with CytoD showed a significant decrease in the migration of both the TTC3 variant bearing and the isogenic control NPCs. The treatment of the control NPCs with Y27632 had a significant increase in migration into the wound (Relative wound density) that resembled that of the untreated TTC3 variant bearing NPCs (Fig. 6A-E). Jaspla had no effect on the control NPCs but showed a decrease in migration of the TTC3 variant bearing NPCs. The treatment of TTC3 variant bearing neurons with CytoD significantly decreased the neurite branch points/cell body and the neurite length so that they more closely resemble that of the isogenic control neurons (Fig. 6F-H). On the other hand, the treatment of the day 70 neurons (both isogenic control and the TTC3 variant bearing) with Y27632 led to increases in neurite length. The results of these analysis show that the alteration of NPC morphology and migration and neurite length and branching in the TTC3 p.S1038C variant bearing cells is regulated, at least in part, through the modulation of actin polymerization.

Figure 6. Migration and Neurite Formation of TTC3 pS1038C Bearing Neuronal Precursor Cells after Treatment with Actin Disrupting Agents.

Figure 6.

A-E. Scratch wound assay on D30 neuron precursor cells recording cell migration 24 hours before and 24 hours after treatment with Cytochalasin D (CytoD), Jasplakinolide (Jaspla) and Y27632. Migration rate was measured as the wound area relative to the spatial cell density outside of the wound (Wound Density) throughout the duration of the experiment (C-D) and at endpoint (E). Scale Bars: 300 μm F-H. Representative images and quantification of neurite formation after treatment with Cytochalasin D (CytoD), Jasplakinolide (Jaspla) and Y27632, recorded from D30 to D35 and presented as neurite length per surface area. The intersection of two masked neurites in an image presented as branch points/cell body cluster count. Scale Bars: 150 μm. *: p-value<0.05, **: p-value<0.01, ****: p-value<0.0001.

Altogether, these results demonstrate that ROCK inhibition by Y27632 induces phenotypical changes in unedited cells that resemble those observed in the TTC3 p.S1038C cells, which suggest the RhoA-PIIA pathway is, indeed, responsible for structural and physiological changes in these TTC3 mutation bearing cells. These results also suggest that corrections in ATP-Actin availability and actin microfilament stability at specific timepoints may both be necessary to rescue the TTC3 p.S1038 phenotype. Jaspla is an actin microfilament polymerization inducer that acts on thymosin-β4 to increase the availability of ATP-Actin that contributes to microfilament elongation (Bubb et al, 2000). Its effect on NPCs suggests that the availability of ATP-actin for microfilament polymerization is essential for ultrastructural integrity and mobility of NPCs, which is dysregulated by the inhibition of TTC3 activity. The actin microfilament polymerization inhibitor CytoD can bind to the ends of the actin microfilament and prevent monomer association, sever actin filaments and cause actin aggregation (Schliwa, 1982). Although CytoD reduced cell migration and neuritogenesis due to its drastic effects on the actin microfilaments, it did not improve the cytoskeletal patterns of the TTC3 pS1038C neurons. In addition, the pathway analysis also correlated directly with some of the cellular phenotypes that we characterised. Treatment of the neurons with the actin polymerization inhibitor Cytochalasin D reversed the enhanced neurite length and neurite branch points in the edited cells. Moreover, the actin cytoskeleton pathway was also dysregulated in the pathway analysis (adjusted p value = 3.8x10−3). This finding adds to the work of previous studies demonstrating a connection of TTC3 to actin organization (Berto, et al, 2014).

The TTC3 E3 ubiquitin ligase function maybe also be contributing to AD pathogenesis through additional mechanisms. In addition to AKT, both POLG and SMAD ubiquitination regulatory factor 2 (SMURF2) have been identified as targets and others may yet be discovered (Gong et al, 2017; Kim, et al, 2019). POLG is a critical replication and repair enzyme in the mitochondria (Gong et al, 2017). In addition, through the degradation of SMURF2, TTC3 influences TGF-β signalling (Kim, et al, 2019). While just one of hundreds of E3 ligases, TTC3 is an intriguing potential therapeutic target for AD by small molecules (Morreale and Walden, 2016; Gong, et al 2016). Moreover, disruption of the Ubiquitin Proteasome System (UPS) has been suggested as a contributing mechanism of neurodegeneration (Upadhyay et al, 2017). TTC3 is just one of numerous ubiquitin signalling genes connected to neurodegenerative diseases (Schmidt et al, 2021). Additional ubiquitin ligases implicated in AD include CHIP, HRD1, Nedd4, and RNF182 (Sahara et al, 2005; Kaneko et al, 2010; Rodrigues et al, 2016; Liu et al, 2008).

Consequences from modulation of TTC3 may be complex, for in addition to having numerous isoforms expressed, the gene has also been shown to generate circular and long noncoding RNAs (Cai et al, 2019, Zhang et al, 2021). These RNAs have demonstrated a myriad of functions, including regulating apoptosis in retinal ganglion cells and sequestering microRNAs to modulate cardiac function and protect against inflammation, oxidative stress, and hypoxic injury (Cai et al, 2019, Yu et al, 2020, Ma et al, 2021, Zhang, et al, 2021). In addition, TTC3-AS1 has been shown to be differentially expressed in Parkinson’s disease (Huang et al, 2022). Thus, the involvement of TTC3 with neurodegeneration may be both nuanced and multifaceted, requiring additional examination.

4. Conclusions

The results from this study suggest that the TTC3 p.S1038C variant causes a partial loss of function. This, along with the lower cortical TTC3 expression in LOAD patients and an inverse relationship between TTC3 levels and AD neuropathology, may indicate that reduced levels may contribute to AD pathology, and not merely be a consequence of the disease (Webster et al, 2009; Zhang et al, 2013).

Supplementary Material

1

Supplemental Figure 1. TTC3 Expression

A. TTC3 mRNA expression assessed by qPCR. B. Western blot analysis and quantification of TTC3 protein expression. C. Immunofluorescent detection of TTC3 in cell monolayers. Scale bars: 10 μm. D. Western Blot membrane images. Black arrow heads on C-E point to the TTC3 expected molecular weight of ~229 kDa. Red arrow on C points to a low molecular weight band of ~125 kDA observed in iPSCs. *: p-value<0.05.

2

Antibody List and Dilutions

Antibody Maker Item No. Antibody Dilution
ICC Western
Blot
Recombinant Anti-PAX6 antibody [EPR15858] Abcam ab195045 1:500
Human/Mouse/Rat SOX1 Antibody R&D Systems AF3369 1:20
Purified anti-Tubulin β-3 (TUBB3) Antibody Biolegend PRB-435P 1:1000 1:1000
Anti-MAP2 antibody Abcam ab5392 1:1000
Monoclonal Anti-Synaptophysin Sigma Aldrich S5768 1:200 1:1000
Recombinant Anti-Synapsin I antibody [EPR23531-50] Abcam ab254349 1:200 1:1000
TTC3 Polyclonal Antibody (200ul) rabbit 229kd Abcam ab80061 1:200 1:500
Recombinant Anti-AKT1 + AKT2 + AKT3 antibody [EPR16798] Abcam ab179463 1:10000
Recombinant Anti-AKT1 + AKT2 + AKT3 (phospho S472 + S473 + S474) antibody [EPR18853] Abcam ab192623 1:1000
Anti-GAPDH antibody produced in mouse Sigma Aldrich SAB1405848 1:1000
Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed SecondaryAntibody, Alexa Fluor Plus 594 Invitrogen A32754 1:500
Goat anti-Chicken IgY (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor Plus 647 Invitrogen A32933 1:500
Goat anti-Mouse IgM (Heavy chain) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 488 Invitrogen A21042 1:500
Anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked Antibody Cell Signaling Technology 7074P2 1:3000
Anti-mouse IgG, HRP-linked Antibody Bio-Rad 1706516 1:5000

Highlights.

  • The AD risk variant TTC3 p.S1038C reduces the expression levels of TTC3

  • The variant modifies the expression of AD specific genes BACE1, INPP5F, and UNC5C

  • Neurons with the variant are enriched for genes in the PI3K-Akt pathway

  • iPSC-derived neurons with the alteration have increased neurite length and branching

  • The variant interferes with actin cytoskeleton and is ameliorated by Cytochalasin D

Acknowledgements

Funding: This work was supported by the Florida Department of Health Ed and Ethel Moore Alzheimer’s Disease Research Program [grant number 7AZ20 to HNC], and the National Institutes of Health [grant number R25NS090624 to JMV].

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Disclosure Statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Verification

This work has not been published previously, nor is it under consideration for publication elsewhere. It is approved by all authors and, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form.

References

  1. Alfaidi et al. , 2021. Alfaidi M, Scott ML, Orr AW. Sinner or Saint?: Nck Adaptor Proteins in Vascular Biology. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 May 26;9:688388. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.688388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartholome et al. , 2017. Bartholome O, Van den Ackerveken P, Sánchez Gil J, et al. Puzzling Out Synaptic Vesicle 2 Family Members Functions. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017 May 22;10:148. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beecham et al. , 2018. Beecham GW, Vardarajan B, Blue E, et al. Rare genetic variation implicated in non-Hispanic white families with Alzheimer disease. Neurol Genet. 2018 Nov 21;4(6):e286. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bellenguez et al. , 2022. Bellenguez C, Küçükali F, Jansen IE, et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Nat Genet. 2022 Apr;54(4):412–436. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01024-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berto et al. , 2007. Berto G, Camera P, Fisco C, et al. The Down syndrome critical region protein TTC3 inhibits neuronal differentiation via RhoA and Citron kinase. J Cell Sci. 2007 Jun 1;120(Pt 11):1859–67. doi: 10.1242/jcs.000703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berto et al. , 2014. Berto GE, Iobbi C, Camera P, et al. The DCR protein TTC3 affects differentiation and Golgi compactness in neurons through specific actin-regulating pathways. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 2;9(4):e93721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blacker et al. , 1998. Blacker D, Wilcox MA, Laird NM, et al. Alpha-2 macroglobulin is genetically associated with Alzheimer disease. Nat Genet. 1998 Aug;19(4):357–60. doi: 10.1038/1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blauwendraat et al. , 2019. Blauwendraat C, Heilbron K, Vallerga CL, et al. Parkinson's disease age at onset genome-wide association study: Defining heritability, genetic loci, and α-synuclein mechanisms. Mov Disord. 2019 Jun;34(6):866–875. doi: 10.1002/mds.27659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bubb et al. , 2000. Bubb MR, Spector I, Beyer BB, et al. Effects of jasplakinolide on the kinetics of actin polymerization. An explanation for certain in vivo observations. J Biol Chem. 2000 Feb 18;275(7):5163–70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.7.5163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cai et al. , 2019. Cai L, Qi B, Wu X, et al. Circular RNA Ttc3 regulates cardiac function after myocardial infarction by sponging miR-15b. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2019 May;130:10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Callahan et al. , 2021. Callahan V, Hawks S, Crawford MA, et al. The Pro-Inflammatory Chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 Are Upregulated Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection in an AKT-Dependent Manner. Viruses. 2021 Jun 3;13(6):1062. doi: 10.3390/v13061062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Capiralla et al. , 2012. Capiralla Hemachander 1, Vingtdeux Valérie, Zhao Haitian, et al. Resveratrol mitigates lipopolysaccharide- and Aβ-mediated microglial inflammation by inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB/STAT signaling cascade. J Neurochem. 2012 Feb;120(3):461–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07594.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang et al. , 2015. Chang S, Reim K, Pedersen M, et al. Complexin stabilizes newly primed synaptic vesicles and prevents their premature fusion at the mouse calyx of held synapse. J Neurosci. 2015 May 27;35(21):8272–90. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4841-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen et al. , 2013. Chen EY, Tan CM, Kou Y, et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 15;14:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen et al. , 2017. Chen J, Wang Z, Zheng ZM, et al. Neuron and microglia/macrophage-derived FGF10 activate neuronal FGFR2/PI3K/Akt signaling and inhibit microglia/macrophages TLR4/NF-κB-dependent neuroinflammation to improve functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Cell Death Dis. 2017 Oct 5;8(10):e3090. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen et al. , 2018. Chen MK, Mecca AP, Naganawa M, et al. Assessing Synaptic Density in Alzheimer Disease With Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Oct 1;75(10):1215–1224. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chiu et al. , 2008. Chiu S-L, Chen C-M, Cline HT. Insulin receptor signaling regulates synapse number, dendritic plasticity, and circuit function in vivo. Neuron. 2008 Jun 12;58(5):708–19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cochran et al. , 2019. Cochran JN, McKinley EC, Cochran M, et al. Genome sequencing for early-onset or atypical dementia: high diagnostic yield and frequent observation of multiple contributory alleles. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2019 Dec 13;5(6):a003491. doi: 10.1101/mcs.a003491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dardou et al. , 2011. Dardou D, Dassesse D, Cuvelier L, et al. Distribution of SV2C mRNA and protein expression in the mouse brain with a particular emphasis on the basal ganglia system. Brain Res. 2011 Jan 7;1367:130–45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Da Silva et al. , 2003. Da Silva Jorge Santos 1, Medina Miguel, Zuliani Cecilia, et al. RhoA/ROCK regulation of neuritogenesis via profilin IIa-mediated control of actin stability. J Cell Biol. 2003 Sep 29;162(7):1267–79. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200304021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dudek et al. , 1997. Dudek H 1, Datta SR, Franke TF, et al. Regulation of neuronal survival by the serine-threonine protein kinase Akt. Science. 1997 Jan 31;275(5300):661–5. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5300.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dugan et al. , 2022. Dugan AJ, Nelson PT, Katsumata Y, et al. Association between WWOX/MAF variants and dementia-related neuropathologic endophenotypes. Neurobiol Aging. 2022 Mar;111:95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dunn et al. , 2017. Dunn AR, Stout KA, Ozawa M, et al. Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2C (SV2C) modulates dopamine release and is disrupted in Parkinson disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 14;114(11):E2253–E2262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616892114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ebrahimi-Barough et al. , 2016. Ebrahimi-Barough S, Hoveizi E, Yazdankhah M, et al. Inhibitor of PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway Small Molecule Promotes Motor Neuron Differentiation of Human Endometrial Stem Cells Cultured on Electrospun Biocomposite Polycaprolactone/Collagen Scaffolds. Mol Neurobiol. 2017 May;54(4):2547–2554. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-9828-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Endo et al. , 2023. Endo R, Chen Y-K, Burke J, et al. Dysregulation of ribosome-associated quality control elicits cognitive disorders via overaccumulation of TTC3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 21;120(12):e2211522120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211522120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fagerberg et al. , 2014. Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, Oksvold P, et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014 Feb;13(2):397–406. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.035600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Franke 2008. Franke TF. PI3K/Akt: getting it right matters. Oncogene. 2008 Oct 27;27(50):6473–88. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gómez Ravetti et al. , 2010. Gómez Ravetti M, Rosso OA, Berretta R, et al. Uncovering molecular biomarkers that correlate cognitive decline with the changes of hippocampus' gene expression profiles in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One. 2010 Apr 13;5(4):e10153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gong et al. , 2016. Gong B, Radulovic M, Figueiredo-Pereira ME, et al. The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System: Potential Therapeutic Targets for Alzheimer's Disease and Spinal Cord Injury. Front Mol Neurosci. 2016 Jan 26;9:4. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gong et al. , 2017. Gong Y, Wang X, Shang X, et al. Tetratricopeptide repeat domain 3 overexpression tends to form aggregates and inhibit ubiquitination and degradation of DNA polymerase γ. Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 17;8(63):106475–106485. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gong et al. , 2019. Gong Y, Wang K, Xiao SP, et al. Overexpressed TTC3 Protein Tends to be Cleaved into Fragments and Form Aggregates in the Nucleus. Neuromolecular Med. 2019 Mar;21(1):85–96. doi: 10.1007/s12017-018-8509-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hamos et al. , 1989. Hamos JE, DeGennaro LJ, Drachman DA. Synaptic loss in Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Neurology. 1989 Mar;39(3):355–61. doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.3.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Heese et al. , 2001. Heese K, Nagai Y, Sawada T. Identification of a new synaptic vesicle protein 2B mRNA transcript which is up-regulated in neurons by amyloid beta peptide fragment (1-42). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001 Dec 21;289(5):924–8. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Holzinger, 2001. Holzinger A. Jasplakinolide: An Actin-Specific Reagent that Promotes Actin Polymerization. Methods Mol Biol. 2001;161:109–20. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-051-9:109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hossini et al. , 2016. Hossini AM, Quast AS, Plötz M, et al. PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway Is Essential for Survival of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. PLoS One. 2016 May 3;11(5):e0154770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hoyer, 2002. Hoyer S. The aging brain. Changes in the neuronal insulin/insulin receptor signal transduction cascade trigger late-onset sporadic Alzheimer disease (SAD). A mini-review. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2002 Jul;109(7–8):991–1002. doi: 10.1007/s007020200082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Huang et al. , 2022. Huang T, Zhao JY, Pan RR, et al. Dysregulation of Circulatory Levels of lncRNAs in Parkinson's Disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2023 Jan;60(1):317–328. doi: 10.1007/s12035-022-03086-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jęśko et al. , 2021. Jęśko H, Wieczorek I, Wencel PL, et al. Age-Related Transcriptional Deregulation of Genes Coding Synaptic Proteins in Alzheimer's Disease Murine Model: Potential Neuroprotective Effect of Fingolimod. Front Mol Neurosci. 2021 Jul 9;14:660104. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2021.660104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jiao et al. , 2014. Jiao B, Liu X, Tang B, et al. Investigation of TREM2, PLD3, and UNC5C variants in patients with Alzheimer's disease from mainland China. Neurobiol Aging. 2014 Oct;35(10):2422.e9–2422.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Joseph et al. , 1995. Joseph R, Dou D, Tsang W. Neuronatin mRNA: alternatively spliced forms of a novel brain-specific mammalian developmental gene. Brain Res. 1995 Aug 28;690(1):92–8. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00621-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ka, et al. , 2017. Ka HI, Han S, Jeong AL, et al. Neuronatin Is Associated with an Anti-Inflammatory Role in the White Adipose Tissue. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017 Jun 28;27(6):1180–1188. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1702.02049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kaneko et al. , 2010. Kaneko M, Koike H, Saito R, et al. Loss of HRD1-mediated protein degradation causes amyloid precursor protein accumulation and amyloid-beta generation. J Neurosci. 2010 Mar 17;30(11):3924–32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2422-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim et al. , 2019. Kim JH, Ham S, Lee Y, et al. TTC3 contributes to TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and myofibroblast differentiation, potentially through SMURF2 ubiquitylation and degradation. Cell Death Dis. 2019 Jan 29;10(2):92. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1308-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kohli et al. , 2016. Kohli MA, Cukier HN, Hamilton-Nelson KL, et al. Segregation of a rare TTC3 variant in an extended family with late-onset Alzheimer disease. Neurol Genet. 2016 Jan 14;2(1):e41. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Korvatska et al. , 2015. Korvatska O, Leverenz JB, Jayadev S, et al. R47H Variant of TREM2 Associated With Alzheimer Disease in a Large Late-Onset Family: Clinical, Genetic, and Neuropathological Study. JAMA Neurol. 2015 Aug;72(8):920–7. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kunkle et al. , 2019. Kunkle BW, Grenier-Boley B, Sims R, et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat Genet. 2019 Mar;51(3):414–430. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lambert et al. , 2013. Lambert JC, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Harold D, et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet. 2013 Dec;45(12):1452–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.2802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Laverde-Paz et al. , 2021. Laverde-Paz MJ, Nuytemans K, Wang L, et al. Derivation of stem cell line UMi028-A-2 containing a CRISPR/Cas9 induced Alzheimer's disease risk variant p.S1038C in the TTC3 gene. Stem Cell Res. 2021 Apr;52:102258. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2021.102258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Li et al. , 2016. Li YH, Fu HL, Tian ML, et al. Neuron-derived FGF10 ameliorates cerebral ischemia injury via inhibiting NF-κB-dependent neuroinflammation and activating PI3K/Akt survival signaling pathway in mice. Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 27;6:19869. doi: 10.1038/srep19869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lien et al. , 2017. Lien EC, Dibble CC, Toker A. PI3K signaling in cancer: beyond AKT. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2017 Apr;45:62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu et al. , 2008. Liu QY, Lei JX, Sikorska M, et al. A novel brain-enriched E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF182 is up regulated in the brains of Alzheimer's patients and targets ATP6V0C for degradation. Mol Neurodegener. 2008 Feb 25;3:4. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-3-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ma et al. , 2021. Ma X, Zhu G, Jiao T, et al. Effects of circular RNA Ttc3/miR-148a/Rcan2 axis on inflammation and oxidative stress in rats with acute kidney injury induced by sepsis. Life Sci. 2021 May 1;272:119233. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Masliah and Terry, 1993. Masliah E, Terry R. The role of synaptic proteins in the pathogenesis of disorders of the central nervous system. Brain Pathol. 1993 Jan;3(1):77–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1993.tb00728.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Manning and Toker, 2017. Manning BD, Toker A. AKT/PKB Signaling: Navigating the Network. Cell. 2017 Apr 20;169(3):381–405. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Medoro et al. , 2019. Medoro A, Bartollino S, Mignogna D, et al. Proteases Upregulation in Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease Brain. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;68(3):931–938. doi: 10.3233/JAD-181284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Miguel et al. , 2005. Miguel RF, Pollak A, Lubec G. Metalloproteinase ADAMTS-1 but not ADAMTS-5 is manifold overexpressed in neurodegenerative disorders as Down syndrome, Alzheimer's and Pick's disease. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2005 Jan 5;133(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Morreale and Walden, 2016. Morreale FE, Walden H. Types of Ubiquitin Ligases. Cell. 2016 Mar 24;165(1):248–248.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Nalls et al. , 2014. Nalls MA, Pankratz N, Lill CM, et al. Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson's disease. Nat Genet. 2014 Sep;46(9):989–93. doi: 10.1038/ng.3043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nelson et al. , 2019. Nelson PT, Dickson DW, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE): consensus working group report. Brain. 2019 Jun 1;142(6):1503–1527. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Noshita et al. , 2002. Noshita N, Lewén A, Sugawara T, et al. Akt phosphorylation and neuronal survival after traumatic brain injury in mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2002 Apr;9(3):294–304. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.2002.0482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ohira et al. , 1996. Ohira M, Ootsuyama A, Suzuki E et al. Identification of a novel human gene containing the tetratricopeptide repeat domain from the Down syndrome region of chromosome 21. DNA Res. 1996 Feb 29;3(1):9–16. doi: 10.1093/dnares/3.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Oyang, et al. , 2011. Oyang EL, Davidson BC, Lee W, et al. Functional characterization of the dendritically localized mRNA neuronatin in hippocampal neurons. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. O’Neill, 2013. O’Neill C. PI3-kinase/Akt/mTOR signaling: impaired on/off switches in aging, cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. Exp Gerontol. 2013 Jul;48(7):647–53. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Qui et al. , 2009. Qiu C, Kivipelto M, von Stauss E. Epidemiology of Alzheimer's disease: occurrence, determinants, and strategies toward intervention. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(2):111–28. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.2/cqiu [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Rachidi et al. , 2000. Rachidi M, Lopes C, Gassanova S, et al. Regional and cellular specificity of the expression of TPRD, the tetratricopeptide Down syndrome gene, during human embryonic development. Mech Dev. 2000 May;93(1-2):189–93. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(00)00259-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ramons-Miguel et al. , 2018. Ramons-Miguel A, Jones AA, Sawada K, et al. Frontotemporal dysregulation of the SNARE protein interactome is associated with faster cognitive decline in old age. Neurobiol Dis. 2018 Jun;114:31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Rao et al. , 2017. Rao JS, Kellom M, Kim HW, et al. Neuroinflammation and synaptic loss. Neurochem Res. 2012 May;37(5):903–10. doi: 10.1007/s11064-012-0708-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Read and Gorman, 2009. Read DE, Gorman AM. Involvement of Akt in neurite outgrowth. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009 Sep;66(18):2975–84. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0057-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rickle et al. , 2004. Rickle A, Bogdanovic N, Volkman I, et al. Akt activity in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Neuroreport. 2004 Apr 29;15(6):955–9. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200404290-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Robinson et al. , 2010. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139–40. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Rodrigues et al. , 2016. Rodigues EM, Scudder SL, Goo MS, et al. Aβ-Induced Synaptic Alterations Require the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Nedd4-1. J Neurosci. 2016 Feb 3;36(5):1590–5. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2964-15.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Rohatgi et al. , 2001. Rohatgi R, Nollau P, Ho HY, et al. Nck and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate synergistically activate actin polymerization through the N-WASP-Arp2/3 pathway. J Biol Chem. 2001 Jul 13;276(28):26448–52. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103856200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ryder et al. , 2004. Ryder J, Su Y, Ni B. Akt/GSK3beta serine/threonine kinases: evidence for a signalling pathway mediated by familial Alzheimer's disease mutations. Cell Signal. 2004 Feb;16(2):187–200. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2003.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Sahara et al. , 2005. Sahara N, Murayama M, Mizoroki T, et al. In vivo evidence of CHIP up-regulation attenuating tau aggregation. J Neurochem. 2005 Sep;94(5):1254–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03272.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Salinas et al. , 2001. Salinas M, Martín D, Alvarez A. Akt1/PKBalpha protects PC12 cells against the parkinsonism-inducing neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and reduces the levels of oxygen-free radicals. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2001 Jan;17(1):67–77. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2000.0921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Schliwa, 1982. Schliwa M. Action of cytochalasin D on cytoskeletal networks. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jan;92(1):79–91. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.1.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Schmidt et al. , 2021. Schmidt MF, Gan ZY, Komander D, et al. Ubiquitin signalling in neurodegeneration: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Death Differ. 2021 Feb;28(2):570–590. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-00706-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Schwartzentruber et al. , 2021. Schwartzentruber J, Cooper S, Liu JZ, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis, fine-mapping and integrative prioritization implicate new Alzheimer's disease risk genes. Nat Genet. 2021 Mar;53(3):392–402. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00776-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Shah and Rossie, 2018. Shah K, Rossie S. Tale of the Good and the Bad Cdk5: Remodeling of the Actin Cytoskeleton in the Brain. Mol Neurobiol. 2018 Apr;55(4):3426–3438. doi: 10.1007/s12035-017-0525-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Shi et al. , 2013. Shi J, Wu X, Surma M, et al. Distinct roles for ROCK1 and ROCK2 in the regulation of cell detachment. Cell Death Dis. 2013 Feb 7;4(2):e483. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Shioda et al. , 2009. Shioda N, Han F, Fukunaga K. Role of Akt and ERK signaling in the neurogenesis following brain ischemia. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009;85:375–87. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(09)85026-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sims et al. , 2020. Sims R, Hill M, Williams J. The multiplex model of the genetics of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Neurosci. 2020 Mar;23(3):311–322. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0599-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Stockburger et al. , 2016. Stockburger C, Miano D, Baeumlisberger M, et al. A Mitochondrial Role of SV2a Protein in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease: Studies with Levetiracetam. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50(1):201–15. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Stout et al. , 2019. Stout KA, Dunn AR, Hoffman C, et al. The Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2: Structure, Function, and Disease Relevance. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019 Sep 18;10(9):3927–3938. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Suizu et al. , 2009. Suizu F, Hiramuki Y, Okumura F, et al. The E3 ligase TTC3 facilitates ubiquitination and degradation of phosphorylated Akt. Dev Cell. 2009 Dec;17(6):800–10. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Sun et al. , 2015. Sun JH, Wang HF, Zhu XC, et al. The Impact of UNC5C Genetic Variations on Neuroimaging in Alzheimer's Disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2016 Dec;53(10):6759–6767. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9589-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Tan et al. , 2021. Tan MS, Yang YX, Xu W, et al. Associations of Alzheimer's disease risk variants with gene expression, amyloidosis, tauopathy, and neurodegeneration. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021 Jan 8;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00755-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Thiel, 1993. Thiel G. Synapsin I, synapsin II, and synaptophysin: marker proteins of synaptic vesicles. Brain Pathol. 1993 Jan;3(1):87–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1993.tb00729.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Tsukahara et al. , 1996. Tsukahara F, Hattori M, Muraki T, et al. Identification and cloning of a novel cDNA belonging to tetratricopeptide repeat gene family from Down syndrome-critical region 21q22.2. J Biochem. 1996 Oct;120(4):820–7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Upadhyay et al. , 2017. Upadhyay A, Joshi V, Amanullah A, et al. E3 Ubiquitin Ligases Neurobiological Mechanisms: Development to Degeneration. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017 May 19;10:151. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Van der Heide et al. , 2005. van der Heide Lars P 1, Kamal Amer, Artola Alain, et al. , 2005. Insulin modulates hippocampal activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in a N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor and phosphatidyl-inositol-3-kinase-dependent manner. J Neurochem. 2005 Aug;94(4):1158–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Varma et al. , 2017. Varma VR, Varma S, An Y, et al. Alpha-2 macroglobulin in Alzheimer's disease: a marker of neuronal injury through the RCAN1 pathway. Mol Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;22(1):13–23. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Vassar et al. , 1999. Vassar R, Bennett BD, Babu-Khan S, et al. Beta-secretase cleavage of Alzheimer's amyloid precursor protein by the transmembrane aspartic protease BACE. Science. 1999 Oct 22;286(5440):735–41. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5440.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wang et al. , 2018. Wang Shanshan 1, He Benhong 2, Hang Weijian, et al. Berberine Alleviates Tau Hyperphosphorylation and Axonopathy-Associated with Diabetic Encephalopathy via Restoring PI3K/Akt/GSK3β Pathway. Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(4):1385–1400. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Webster et al. , 2009. Webster JA, Gibbs JR, Clarke J, et al. Genetic control of human brain transcript expression in Alzheimer disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Apr;84(4):445–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wetzel-Smith et al. , 2014. Wetzel-Smith MK, Hunkapillar J, Bhungale TR, et al. A rare mutation in UNC5C predisposes to late-onset Alzheimer's disease and increases neuronal cell death. Nat Med. 2014 Dec;20(12):1452–7. doi: 10.1038/nm.3736. Epub 2014 Nov 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Witke et al. , 1998. Witke W, Podtelejnikov AV, DiNardo A, et al. In mouse brain profilin I and profilin II associate with regulators of the endocytic pathway and actin assembly. EMBO J. 1998 Feb 16;17(4):967–76. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.4.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Xue et al. , 2022. Xue F, Gao L, Chen TT, et al. Parkinson's Disease rs117896735 Variant Regulates INPP5F Expression in Brain Tissues and Increases Risk of Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;89(1):67–77. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Yang et al. , 2019. Yang HS, Chhatwal JP, Xu J, et al. An UNC5C Allele Predicts Cognitive Decline and Hippocampal Atrophy in Clinically Normal Older Adults. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;68(3):1161–1170. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Yu et al. , 2012. Yu G, Wang L-G, Han Y, He Q-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012 May;16(5):284–7. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118. Epub 2012 Mar 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Yu et al. , 2020. Yu L, Wang Q, Liu N, et al. Circular RNA circ-Ttc3 protects HaCaT cells from hypoxic injury by downregulation of miR-449a. IUBMB Life. 2020 Mar;72(3):505–514. doi: 10.1002/iub.2236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhang et al. , 2013. Zhang B, Gaiteri C, Bodea LG, et al. Integrated systems approach identifies genetic nodes and networks in late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Cell. 2013 Apr 25;153(3):707–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Zhang et al. , 2021. Zhang R, Feng Y, Lu J, et al. lncRNA Ttc3-209 Promotes the Apoptosis of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Retinal Ischemia Reperfusion Injury by Targeting the miR-484/Wnt8a Axis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021 Mar 1;62(3):13. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.3.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Supplemental Figure 1. TTC3 Expression

A. TTC3 mRNA expression assessed by qPCR. B. Western blot analysis and quantification of TTC3 protein expression. C. Immunofluorescent detection of TTC3 in cell monolayers. Scale bars: 10 μm. D. Western Blot membrane images. Black arrow heads on C-E point to the TTC3 expected molecular weight of ~229 kDa. Red arrow on C points to a low molecular weight band of ~125 kDA observed in iPSCs. *: p-value<0.05.

2

RESOURCES