Abstract
Cinobufagin (CBF) is a bufadienolide, which is a major active ingredient of toad venom. In recent years, CBF has attracted increasing attention due to its highly potent and multiple pharmacological activities. To better understand the status of research on CBF, we collated recent studies on CBF to provide a valuable reference for clinical researchers and practitioners. According to reports, CBF exhibits extensive pharmacological properties, including antitumor, analgesic, cardioprotection, immunomodulatory, antifibrotic, antiviral, and antiprotozoal effects. Studies on the pharmacological activity of CBF have mainly focused on its anticancer activity. It has been demonstrated that CBF has a therapeutic effect on liver cancer, osteosarcoma, melanoma, colorectal cancer, acute promyelocytic leukemia, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, multiple myeloma, gastric cancer, and breast cancer. However, the direct molecular targets of CBF are currently unknown. In addition, there are few reports on toxicological and pharmacokinetic of CBF. Subsequent studies focusing on these aspects will help promote the development and application of CBF in clinical practice.
Keywords: Cinobufagin, Biotransformation, Amphibian Venoms
Background
Toad venom (Bufonis Venenum, known as ‘Chansu’ in Chinese) has been used as a traditional Chinese medicine for more than a thousand years and is listed in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2020 edition) [1,2]. It is prepared from the dried white secretion of the auricular glands and the skin glands of Bufo gargarizans Cantor or Bufo melanostictus Schneider [3]. According to the theory of traditional Chinese medicine, it has efficacy in providing detoxification, pain relief, resuscitation, and refreshment [4,5]. The chemical constituents of toad venom mainly include bufadienolides, indole alkaloids, sterols, polysaccharides, amino acids, and organic acids, among which bufadienolides and indole alkaloids are considered to be the main active ingredients [6–8]. Modern pharmacological studies have demonstrated that toad venom possesses a multitude of pharmacological activities, including antitumor, cardiac, antibacterial, and analgesic activities effects [4,9,10].
Cinobufagin (CBF), a bufadienolide derived from toad venom, was first isolated by Jensen et al from Chansu in 1932 [11]. Multiple studies have focused on its pharmacological effects and molecular mechanisms. This suggests that CBF has broad prospects in therapeutic applications. However, at present there is no systematic review on CBF. This article reviews the pharmacological properties of CBF, including its antitumor, analgesic, cardioprotection, immunomodulatory, antifibrotic, antiviral, and antiprotozoal effects, and its physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties. This article aims to review in vitro and preclinical studies on cinobufagin, a bufadienolide derived from toad venom.
Physicochemical Properties
As shown in Figure 1, CBF is a bufadienolide with properties such as molecular structure[(1R,2S,4R,5R,6R,7R,10S,11S,14S,16R)-14-hydroxy-7,11-dimethyl-6-(6-oxopyran-3-yl)-3-oxapentacyclo [8.8.0.02,4.02,7.011,16] octadecan-5-yl] acetate, molecular formula: C26H34O6, molecular weight of 442.54 g/mol, and melting point of 222–223°C [12–14].
Figure 1.

Cinobufagin.
Pharmacological Activities of CBF
Antitumor Effects of CBF
Cancer is a common disease globally that seriously affects human health. Recent studies have illuminated that CBF suppressed the growth of a wide variety of tumor cells, including liver cancer, osteosarcoma, melanoma, colorectal cancer, acute promyelocytic leukemia, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, multiple myeloma, breast cancer, and gastric carcinoma [15]. The anticancer activities and related mechanisms of CBF are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Anticancer activities of CBF – in vitro and in vivo studies summary.
| Cancer | Cell lines/model | Activity | Mechanism(s) of action | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver cancer | HepG2 | LD50=170 ng/L(12 h) LD50=78 ng/L (24 h) LD50=40 ng/L (48 h) |
Upregulates the p53 pathway and down-regulates the Akt and ERK pathways | In vitro | [16] |
| HepG2 | IC50=86.025 μM | Downregulation of prosurvival proteins (Bcl-2) and upregulation of the proapoptotic proteins (Fas and Bax) | In vitro | [11] | |
| Nude mice bearing HepG2 cells | 1.14 mg/kg CBF (intraperitoneal route every two day for 20 doses), tumors weight decreased | In vivo | [11] | ||
| Huh-7 | 1 μmol/L viability rate was 74.5±4.5% (12 h), 1 μmol/L viability rate was 53.7±3.8% (24 h), 1 μmol/L viability rate was 27.9±2.3% (36 h) | Triggers defects in spindle formation and cap-dependent translation by inhibiting the AURKA-mTOR-eIF4E Axis | In vitro | [17] | |
| Nude mice bearing Huh-7 cells | 10 mg/kg CBF (intratumorally injected for 21 days), tumors weight decreased | In vivo | [17] | ||
| Osteosarcoma | U2OS | Inhibits the viability | Induces cell cycle arrest at G2/M phases and induces apoptosis via inhibition of the GSK-3β/NF-κB pathway. | In vitro | [18] |
| MG63 | Inhibits the viability | In vitro | [18] | ||
| SaOS-2 | Inhibits the viability | In vitro | [18] | ||
| U2OS | Inhibits the viability | Downregulates the stem-like properties of osteosarcoma cells, thus inhibiting the process of tumorigenesis by inhibiting the IL-6-OPN-STAT3 pathway | In vitro | [19] | |
| MG63 | Inhibits the viability | In vitro | [19] | ||
| U2OS | IC50=120 mg/L (24 h) | Triggers apoptosis and autophagic cell death via activation of the ROS/JNK/p-38 axis | In vitro | [20] | |
| Melanoma | A375 | IC50=0.2 μg/mL (24 h) | Induces cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and induces apoptosis by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt pathway | In vitro | [21] |
| B16 | Inhibits the viability | In vitro | [21] | ||
| OCM1 | IC50=0.8023 μM (48 h) | CBF arrested the cell cycle in the G1 phase and induces apoptosis via intrinsic apoptosis pathway | In vitro | [22] | |
| Nude mice bearing OCM1 cells | 5 mg/kg CBF (injected once a day for 7 days), after 30 days, the mice were killed, the tumors weight decreased | In vivo | [22] | ||
| Colorectal cancer | HCT116 | IC50=0.7821uM (48 h) | Promotes cell apoptosis and inhibits the invasion and metastases via STAT3 signaling pathway | In vitro | [23] |
| RKO | IC50=0.3642uM (48 h) | In vitro | [23] | ||
| SW480 | IC50=0.1822uM (48 h) | In vitro | [23] | ||
| Nude mice bearing HCT116 cells | 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg CBF (intraperitoneal route every other day for 7 doses), the tumors weight decreased | In vivo | [23] | ||
| Acute promyelocytic leukaemia cell | NB4 | Inhibits the viability | Induces cell apoptosis and PML-RARA degradation by inhibiting the β-catenin signaling pathway | In vitro | [26] |
| NB4-R1 | Inhibits the viability | In vitro | [26] | ||
| Nasopharyngeal carcinoma | HK-1 | IC50=0.061 μg/ml | Induces cell cycle arrest at the S phase and induces apoptosis through the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway | In vitro | [27] |
| 5–8F | 446.0 nM | Induces ENKUR to repress the β-catenin/c-Jun/MYH9 signal and thus decreased UBE3A-mediated p53 ubiquitination degradation, ultimately, epithelial-mesenchymal transition signal is inactivated to suppress nasopharyngeal carcinoma metastasis | In vitro | [28] | |
| HONE-1 | 627.6 nM | In vitro | [28] | ||
| Multiple myeloma | U266 | Inhibits the viability | Inhibits ROS-mediated MAPKs signaling pathway and this led to the down-regulation of various gene products that mediate tumor cell survival, proliferation, metastasis and angiogenesis | In vitro | [29] |
| Gastric cancer | SGC-7901 | 0.24 mM (24 h) | Induces cell apoptosis and inhibition of autophagy enhances CBF-induced apoptosis | In vitro | [30] |
| Breast cancer | MCF-7 | 0.94±0.08 μM (24 h) 0.44±0.12 μM (48 h) 0.22±0.03 μM (72 h) |
Induces cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase and induces apoptosis through the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway | In vitro | [31] |
Liver Cancer
Liver cancer is a common digestive malignant cancer worldwide with a high mortality rate. Several studies have shown that CBF can inhibit proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Wendong Feng et al used CCK-8 assay to examine the growth of cells treated with CBF [16]. The results showed that when CBF concentration increased from 0 to 320 ng/l, the inhibition of HepG2 cells increased from 0% to 65% at 12 h, to 87% at 24 h, and to 99% at 48 h, and the LD50 of CBF was estimated to be 170, 78, and 40 ng/L, respectively. These data indicated that CBF inhibits the proliferation of HepG2 cells in a concentration- and time-dependent manner and has cytotoxicity to HepG2 cells even at very low concentrations. CBF has been found to induce HepG2 cells apoptosis. The apoptotic rate of HepG2 cells treated with CBF (100 ng/L) for 12 h, and 24 h were 13.6% and 25.5%, respectively, whereas the apoptotic rate of HepG2 cells in the control group was 1.6% and 3.2%, respectively. Moreover, CBF reduced the migration ability of HepG2 cells. Liang et al reported that CBF could inhibit HepG2 cell proliferation in vitro (IC50 values were 86.025 μM) and tumor growth in vivo [11]. Xiaohan Jin et al demonstrated that viability rates of Huh-7 cells treated with 1 μmol/L CBF for 12, 24, and 36 h were 74.5±4.5%, 53.7±3.8%, and 27.9±2.3%, respectively, in vitro and CBF induced cell cycle G2/M phase arrest in Huh-7 cells. CBF also suppressed the growth of Huh-7 tumors in vivo when CBF was intratumorally injected at a 10 mg/kg dose for 21 days [17].
Mechanistic studies indicated that CBF could inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of HepG2 cells by upregulating the p53 pathway and downregulating the Akt and ERK pathways [16]. In addition, CBF triggers defects in spindle formation and cap-dependent translation in liver cancer cells by inhibiting the AURKA-mTOR-eIF4E axis [17].
Osteosarcoma
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor. CBF has been reported to inhibit cell proliferation in osteosarcoma cells, including U2OS, MG63, and SaOS-2, in a time- and dose-dependent manner [18]. Researchers found that CBF induced cell cycle arrest at G2/M phases and apoptosis in U2OS, MG63, and SaOS-2 cells. Interestingly, toxicity studies have suggested that CBF has less toxicity or no toxicity to the human osteoblast cell line hFOB 1.19.
Researchers have conducted several studies on the potential mechanism of CBF for osteosarcoma therapy. Junqiang Yin et al found CBF-induced apoptosis via inhibition of the GSK-3β/NF-κB pathway [18]. Chuan Zhang et al demonstrated that CBF suppresses the characteristics of osteosarcoma cancer cells by inhibiting the IL-6-OPN-STAT3 pathway [19]. Kun Ma et al proved that CBF triggered apoptosis and autophagic cell death via activation of the ROS/JNK/p-38 axis [20].
Melanoma
Malignant melanoma is the deadliest type of skin cancer. CBF inhibited human malignant melanoma A375 cells proliferation (IC50=0.2 μg/mL, 24h) and cell colony formation. Additional studies demonstrated that CBF markedly increased the levels of ATM serine/threonine kinase (ATM) and checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) and decreased the levels of cell division cycle 25C (CDC25C), cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), and cyclin B, subsequently inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest in A375 cells [21]. Moreover, CBF induced A375 cells apoptosis by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt pathway [21]. CBF also induced cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and cell apoptosis in B16 cells [21]. In addition, CBF exerted cytotoxicity against human uveal melanoma OCM1 cells (IC50= 0.8023 μM, 48 h) and inhibited the growth of OCM1 xenograft tumors in nude mice [22]. Researcher found that CBF arrested the cell cycle in the G1 phase in a concentration-dependent manner in OCM1 cells and induced cell apoptosis of OCM1 by activating the mitochondrial apoptotic signal pathway [22].
Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal cancer is a common malignant tumor of the digestive system. CBF has been reported to inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion and also promote apoptosis of colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT116, RKO, and SW480 cells) [23]. In vivo, assays confirmed CBF inhibited the growth of HCT116 xenograft tumors in nude mice [23]. CBF also promoted apoptosis and inhibited the invasion, metastases, and angiogenesis of colorectal cancer cells [23, 24]. In addition, CBF demonstrated a strong reversal effect of multidrug resistance in P-gp-overexpressing LoVo/ADR, HCT116/L, and Caco-2/ADR cells, but did not affect their parental cells [25]. It also enhanced the effect of DOX against P-gp-overexpressing LoVo/ADR cell xenografts in nude mice [25].
Molecular mechanistic studies have illustrated CBF suppressed colorectal cancer growth via STAT3 pathway inhibition [23]. CBF also suppressed tumor neovascularization by disrupting the endothelial mTOR/HIF-1α pathway to trigger ROS- mediated vascular endothelial cell apoptosis [24]. The specific mechanism behind the reversal of drug resistance by CBF was also investigated. The results showed that CBF inhibited the activity of the P-gp ATPase but without altering the expression of P-gp [25].
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
Acute promyelocytic leukemia is a hematopoietic malignancy characterized by the accumulation of large amounts of immature blood cells in hematopoietic tissues. Studies have revealed that CBG inhibited the viability of NB4 and NB4-R1 cells in a time-and dose-dependent manner [26], and it induced NB4 and NB4-R1 cell apoptosis and PML-RARA degradation in a caspase-dependent manner by inhibiting the β-catenin signaling pathway.
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is an epithelial carcinoma arising from the nasopharyngeal mucosal lining. CBF significantly inhibited the proliferation of HK-1 cells [27]. Further analyses demonstrated that CBF induces cell cycle arrest at the S phase in HK-1 cells by downregulating the levels of CDK2 and cyclin E. Moreover, CBF downregulated the protein level of Bcl-2 and upregulated the levels of Bax, subsequently increasing the levels of cytoplasmic cytochrome c, Apaf-1, cleaved PARP1, cleaved caspase-3, and cleaved caspase-9, leading to HK-1 apoptosis. Furthermore, CBF increased ROS levels and decreased the mitochondrial membrane potential in HK-1 cells.
In addition, CBF inhibited 5–8F and HONE-1 cells proliferation and decreased the metastasis of 5–8F cells in vivo [28]. Molecular analysis revealed that CBF induced ENKUR to repress the β-catenin/c-Jun/MYH9 signal and thus decreased UBE3A-mediated p53 ubiquitination degradation. As a result, the epithelial-mesenchymal transition signal was inactivated to suppress nasopharyngeal carcinoma metastasis [28].
Multiple Myeloma
Multiple myeloma is a clonal B-cell neoplasia. Compared to peripheral blood mononuclear cells, CBF showed much higher cytotoxicity against multiple myeloma U266 cells [29]. Mechanistic studies have demonstrated that CBF suppressed multiple myeloma growth through modulation of the ROS-mediated MAPKs signaling pathway.
Other Cancers
Some scholars have studied other antitumor activities of CBF. Xuanxuan Xiong et al found that CBF inhibited gastric cancer SGC-7901 cell proliferation and induced caspase-mediated apoptosis [30]. The IC50 value of CBF treatment at 24 h was 0.24 mM. Ling Zhu et al determined the inhibitory effect of CBF on MCF-7 cells [31], showing that CBF inhibited the growth of breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 in a time- and dose-dependent manner, and the IC50 values at 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment were 0.94±0.08, 0.44±0.12, and 0.22±0.03 μM, respectively.
Analgesic Effects of CBF
CBF had been widely used in the treatment of carcinoma and played an important role in the relief of cancer pain. It has been reported that CBF was better than morphine in the treatment of cancer pain. Although morphine works immediately, CBF has an effect on peripheral opioid receptors, has no adverse effects such as addiction like morphine and other opioids, and can be used as a substitute for morphine in the treatment of patients with cancer pain. The underlying mechanism responsible for the analgesic action of CBF was associated with an improved level of peripheral β-END and the role of peripheral opioid receptors [32]. Tao Chen et al found that CBF relieved cancer pain in mice and the CBF-induced local analgesic effect might be associated with increased activity of the POMC/β-END/μ-OR pathway released from invaded CD3/4/8 lymphocytes in cancer tissues [33]. Longsheng Xu demonstrated that CBG exerted significant antinociceptive effects in thermal and chemical pain models, possibly via activating 7nAChR, thereby triggering inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway [34].
Cardiotonic Effects of CBF
The effect of CBF on experimentally induced heart failure caused by acute local ischemia was examined through ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery in a perfused guinea pig heart. The results demonstrated that CBF (3×10−7 M) restored coronary flow in the perfused guinea-pig heart to 90% of the pre-ligation level. Cardiac output and left ventricular pressure in the perfused heart increased to levels prior to the occurrence of acute local ischemia, and left ventricular work was enhanced by CBF (3×10−7 M) to 108% of the pre-ligation level. These findings suggest that CBF exhibits potent cardiotonic action in experimentally induced heart failure resulting from acute local ischemia [35]. Furthermore, researchers have discovered that CBF can inhibit Na+-K+-ATPase activity, shorten the action potential duration, and increase cardiac contractility in guinea pig hearts [36].
Immunomodulatory Effects of CBF
Scholars have found that CBF had potential immune system regulatory effects. They found that CBF stimulated cell proliferation of splenocytes and peritoneal macrophages and markedly enhanced the phagocytic activation of macrophages. CBF also significantly increased CD4+CD8+ double-positive T-cell populations and the percentage of S-phase cells of splenic lymphocytes and increased the ratio of Th1/Th2 [37,38]. Another study showed that CBF enhanced the protective efficacy of formalin-inactivated Salmonella typhimurium vaccine through Th1 immune response [39].
Antifibrotic Effects of CBF
CBF was reported to suppress fibroblast activation and differentiation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and, eventually, the extracellular matrix deposition by inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling. In vivo, experiments also proved that CBF attenuated bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice [40].
Antiviral Effects of CBF
The emergence of severe acute respiratory infectious diseases is often attributed to zoonotic beta coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 [41]. As reported by Jin et al, CBF showed high anti-MERS-CoV activities (IC50, 0.017 μM) and the selectivity indices (SI, CC50/IC50) were >564.7 for CBF [42]. CBF could be a promising bufadienolide for therapeutic use against emerging coronavirus infections such as COVID-19.
CBF was found to inhibit enterovirus 71(EV71) infection in vitro in cell viability and plaque reduction assays. The IC50 of CBF was (10.94±2.36) nmol/L, the 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50) of CBF was (1277±223) nmol/L, and the anti-EV71 selectivity index (SI50) of CBF was 116.7, suggesting promise for drug development. Researchers found that CBF disrupted the synthesis of EV71 protein, but did not affect EV71 RNA replication. Hence, CBF may be a promising candidate for the treatment of EV71-caused disease [43].
Antiprotozoal Effects of CBF
Bio-guided studies have revealed the notable antimicrobial and antiparasitic properties of bufadienolides [44]. The antitrypanosomal activity of CBF was tested in vitro against T. cruzi. The results showed that CBF displayed low mammalian cytotoxicity (IC50= 29.0±2.57) [45].
The Pharmacokinetics of CBF
Pharmacokinetic studies are an important aspect of drug evaluation. Currently, there are limited pharmacokinetic data available on CBF. Wenlong Wei et al reported the pharmacokinetics of CBF in rats [46]. A method was established for rapidly and accurately determining the concentration of CBF in plasma after intragastric administration in a dose of 20 mg/kg in rats, and its specificity, accuracy, precision, recovery, matrix effect, and stability were studied. The Cmax, the time to Cmax (Tmax), and the t1/2 of CBF were 45.83±4.56 ng/mL, 0.083±0 h, and 2.79±0.93 h, respectively. This result indicated that CBF was absorbed and eliminated quickly. The main metabolite was desacetylcinobufagin. The Cmax and area under the curve (AUC0-t) of desacetylcinobufagin were much higher than CBF in plasma samples. However, there are few studies about the pharmacological actions of desacetylcinobufagin.
Future Directions
In this review, we provide a summary of the physicochemical, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic characteristics of CBF to establish a basis for clinical research. According to reports, CBF has been found to possess multiple pharmacological activities, including antitumor, analgesic, cardiotonic, immunomodulatory, antifibrotic, antiviral, and antiprotozoal effects. While there have been numerous studies on its anticancer activity, there is a relative scarcity of research regarding its other pharmacological effects. CBF has demonstrated therapeutic effects on various types of cancer, such as liver cancer, osteosarcoma, melanoma, colorectal cancer, acute promyelocytic leukemia, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, multiple myeloma, gastric cancer, and breast cancer. However, most of the research focusing on its antitumor activity has been limited to the cellular level, necessitating the need for more in vivo and clinical trial investigations. Additionally, the direct targets and mechanism of action of CBF have yet to be fully elucidated. A comprehensive understanding of the targets will aid in guiding clinical treatment strategies involving CBF. Combining CBF with traditional chemotherapy drugs is considered an optimal option for reducing drug resistance and improving cancer treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, there are few reports on the combined treatment of cancers with CBF and traditional chemotherapy drugs. The toxicity of CBF has raised significant concerns regarding its safety as a drug candidate. However, there is a dearth of studies investigating the toxicological and pharmacokinetic aspects of CBF.
Despite possessing numerous pharmacological activities, CBF exhibits poor aqueous solubility, leading to low bioavailability, thus limiting its clinical application [7]. Structural modification is a potential approach to improve CBF’s solubility. However, such modifications may also impact its bioactivity. Developing new pharmaceutical formulations is another way to enhance the bioavailability and solubility of CBF. Various techniques, including solid dispersion, microemulsion, submicroemulsion, cyclodextrin inclusion, and nanodrug delivery systems, have been employed to improve solubility [47,48]. Nevertheless, these methods still face limitations, such as the unresolved instability issues of liposomes, such as aggregation, fusion, and drug leakage during storage. Moreover, the safety concerns associated with these materials hinder their progress in clinical application.
Conclusions
CBF holds great potential as a versatile drug with various pharmacological activities. Further research encompassing in-depth analytical studies, identification of direct binding targets, pharmacokinetic and toxicological investigations, and development of new strategies to overcome its poor solubility are necessary to advance the development and clinical application of CBF.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None declared
Publisher’s note: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher
Declaration of Figures’ Authenticity
All figures submitted have been created by the authors who confirm that the images are original with no duplication and have not been previously published in whole or in part.
Financial support: This work was supported by grants from Heilongjiang Touyan Innovation Team Program (No. 201905), Famous Old Chinese Medicine Experts Inheritance Studio Construction Project (No. 202275), Experienced Chinese Medicine Experts’ Academic Inheritance Project (No. 202276), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82104458)
Reference
- 1.Chan CO, Jing J, Xiao W, et al. Enhanced intestinal permeability of bufalin by a novel bufalin-peptide-dendrimer inclusion through Caco-2 cell monolayer. Molecules. 2017;22(12):2088. doi: 10.3390/molecules22122088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li FJ, Hu JH, Ren X, et al. Toad venom: A comprehensive review of chemical constituents, anticancer activities, and mechanisms. Arch Pharm (Weinheim) 2021;354(7):e2100060. doi: 10.1002/ardp.202100060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Apryani E, Ali U, Wang ZY, et al. The spinal microglial IL-10/beta-endorphin pathway accounts for cinobufagin-induced mechanical antiallodynia in bone cancer pain following activation of alpha7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1616-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ye Q, Zhou X, Han F, Zheng C. Toad venom-derived bufadienolides and their therapeutic application in prostate cancers: Current status and future directions. Front Chem. 2023;11:1137547. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1137547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li C, Hashimi SM, Cao S, et al. The mechanisms of chansu in inducing efficient apoptosis in colon cancer cells. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:849054. doi: 10.1155/2013/849054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Qi J, Zulfiker AHM, Li C, Good D, Wei MQ. The development of toad toxins as potential therapeutic agents. Toxins (Basel) 2018;10(8):336. doi: 10.3390/toxins10080336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shao H, Li B, Li H, et al. Novel strategies for solubility and bioavailability enhancement of bufadienolides. Molecules. 2021;27(1):51. doi: 10.3390/molecules27010051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kolodziejczyk-Czepas J, Stochmal A. Bufadienolides of Kalanchoe species: An overview of chemical structure, biological activity and prospects for pharmacological use. Phytochem Rev. 2017;16(6):1155–71. doi: 10.1007/s11101-017-9525-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wei W, Yu Y, Wang X, et al. Simultaneous determination of bufalin and its nine metabolites in rat plasma for characterization of metabolic profiles and pharmacokinetic study by LC(−)MS/MS. Molecules. 2019;24(9):1662. doi: 10.3390/molecules24091662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lim WJ, Yap AT, Mangudi M, et al. Gambir, “Gambir Sarawak” and toad venom. Drug Test Anal. 2017;9(3):491–99. doi: 10.1002/dta.2034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liang P, Ma Y, Yang L, et al. Uncovering the mechanisms of active components from toad venom against hepatocellular carcinoma using untargeted metabolomics. Molecules. 2022;27(22):7758. doi: 10.3390/molecules27227758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li C, Hashimi SM, Cao S, et al. Chansu inhibits the expression of cortactin in colon cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:207. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0723-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jensen H. Chemical studies on toad poisons, iv, bufagin and cinobufagin. Science. 1932;75(1932):53–54. doi: 10.1126/science.75.1932.53-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hofer P, Linde H, Meyer K. [The structure of cinobufagin]. Experientia. 1959;15:297–98. doi: 10.1007/BF02158531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jia J, Li J, Zheng Q, Li D. A research update on the antitumor effects of active components of Chinese medicine ChanSu. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1014637. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1014637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Feng W, Zhao X, Yao Q, Li D. Cinobufagin inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of hepatocarcinoma cells by activating apoptosis, AKT, and ERK pathways. Acta Biochim Pol. 2022;69(4):831–37. doi: 10.18388/abp.2020_6245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jin X, Wang J, Zou S, et al. Cinobufagin triggers defects in spindle formation and cap-dependent translation in liver cancer cells by inhibiting the AURKA-mTOR-eIF4E axis. Am J Chin Med. 2020;48(3):651–78. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X20500330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yin JQ, Wen L, Wu LC, et al. The glycogen synthase kinase-3beta/nuclear factor-kappa B pathway is involved in cinobufagin-induced apoptosis in cultured osteosarcoma cells. Toxicol Lett. 2013;218(2):129–36. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang C, Ma K, Li WY. Cinobufagin suppresses the characteristics of osteosarcoma cancer cells by inhibiting the IL-6-OPN-STAT3 pathway. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:4075–90. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S224312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 20.Ma K, Zhang C, Huang MY, et al. Cinobufagin induces autophagy-mediated cell death in human osteosarcoma U2OS cells through the ROS/JNK/p38 signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. 2016;36(1):90–98. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.4782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 21.Pan Z, Zhang X, Yu P, et al. Cinobufagin induces cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and promotes apoptosis in malignant melanoma cells. Front Oncol. 2019;9:853. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang L, Huang X, Guo T, et al. Study of cinobufagin as a promising anticancer agent in uveal melanoma through intrinsic apoptosis pathway. Front Oncol. 2020;10:325. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bai Y, Wang X, Cai M, et al. Cinobufagin suppresses colorectal cancer growth via STAT3 pathway inhibition. Am J Cancer Res. 2021;11(1):200–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li X, Chen C, Dai Y, et al. Cinobufagin suppresses colorectal cancer angiogenesis by disrupting the endothelial mammalian target of rapamycin/hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha axis. Cancer Sci. 2019;110(5):1724–34. doi: 10.1111/cas.13988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yuan Z, Shi X, Qiu Y, et al. Reversal of P-gp-mediated multidrug resistance in colon cancer by cinobufagin. Oncol Rep. 2017;37(3):1815–25. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bian Y, Xue M, Guo X, et al. Cinobufagin induces acute promyelocytic leukaemia cell apoptosis and PML-RARA degradation in a caspase-dependent manner by inhibiting the beta-catenin signalling pathway. Pharm Biol. 2022;60(1):1801–11. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2022.2118792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pan Z, Luo Y, Xia Y, et al. Cinobufagin induces cell cycle arrest at the S phase and promotes apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;122:109763. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hou R, Liu X, Yang H, et al. Chemically synthesized cinobufagin suppresses nasopharyngeal carcinoma metastasis by inducing ENKUR to stabilize p53 expression. Cancer Lett. 2022;531:57–70. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Baek SH, Kim C, Lee JH, et al. Cinobufagin exerts anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects through the modulation ROS-mediated MAPKs signaling pathway. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2015;37(3):265–73. doi: 10.3109/08923973.2015.1027916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xiong X, Lu B, Tian Q, et al. Inhibition of autophagy enhances cinobufagin-induced apoptosis in gastric cancer. Oncol Rep. 2019;41(1):492–500. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhu L, Chen Y, Wei C, et al. Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of cinobufagin on human breast cancer MCF-7 cells and its molecular mechanism. Nat Prod Res. 2018;32(4):493–97. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2017.1315575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen T, Hu W, He H, et al. A study on the mechanism of cinobufagin in the treatment of paw cancer pain by modulating local beta -endorphin expression in vivo. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:851256. doi: 10.1155/2013/851256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen T, Yuan S, Wan XN, et al. Chinese herb cinobufagin-reduced cancer pain is associated with increased peripheral opioids by invaded CD3/4/8 lymphocytes. Oncotarget. 2017;8(7):11425–41. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xu L, Zhang X, Feng Q, et al. Alpha-7 nicotinic receptor-targeted cinobufagin induces antinociception and inhibits NF-kappaB signaling pathway in DRG neurons. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019;10(1):497–506. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yamahara J, Tanaka S, Matsuda H, et al. [The mode of cardiac action of cardiotonic steroids isolated from Toad Cake in perfused working guinea-pig heart and effect of cinobufagin on experimental heart failure]. Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 1986;88(6):413–23. doi: 10.1254/fpj.88.413. [in Japanese] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hirai Y, Morishita S, Ito C, Sakanashi M. [Effects of bufadienolides and some kinds of cardiotonics on guinea pig hearts]. Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 1992;100(2):127–35. doi: 10.1254/fpj.100.127. [in Japanese] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang XL, Zhao GH, Zhang J, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of cinobufagin isolated from Chan Su on activation and cytokines secretion of immunocyte in vitro. J Asian Nat Prod Res. 2011;13(5):383–92. doi: 10.1080/10286020.2011.565746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yu Y, Wang H, Meng X, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of cinobufagin on murine lymphocytes and macrophages. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:835263. doi: 10.1155/2015/835263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wu SC, Yi PF, Guo X, et al. Cinobufagin enhances the protective efficacy of formalin-inactivated Salmonella typhimurium vaccine through Th1 immune response. Microb Pathog. 2016;99:264–70. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li X, Bi Z, Liu S, et al. Antifibrotic mechanism of cinobufagin in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1021. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.de Wit E, van Doremalen N, Falzarano D, Munster VJ. SARS and MERS: Recent insights into emerging coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(8):523–34. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jin YH, Jeon S, Lee J, et al. Broad spectrum antiviral properties of cardiotonic steroids used as potential therapeutics for emerging coronavirus infections. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(11):1839. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen J, Xu L, Sun S, et al. Identification of cinobufagin and resibufogenin as inhibitors of enterovirus 71 infection. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities. 2014;30:953–58. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cunha Filho GA, Schwartz CA, Resck IS, et al. Antimicrobial activity of the bufadienolides marinobufagin and telocinobufagin isolated as major components from skin secretion of the toad Bufo rubescens. Toxicon. 2005;45(6):777–82. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rodriguez C, Ibanez R, Mojica L, et al. Bufadienolides from the skin secretions of the neotropical toad Rhinella alata (Anura: Bufonidae): Antiprotozoal activity against Trypanosoma cruzi. Molecules. 2021;26(14):4217. doi: 10.3390/molecules26144217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wei WL, Li H, Li ZW, et al. Simultaneous determination of cinobufagin and its five metabolites in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS for characterization of metabolic profiles and pharmacokinetic study. Anal Methods-Uk. 2019;11(42):5464–71. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Guan Q, Sun S, Li X, et al. Preparation, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of mPEG-PLGA nanoparticles co-loaded with syringopicroside and hydroxytyrosol. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(2):24. doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5641-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sun S, Guan Q, Shang E, et al. Hyaluronic acid-coated nanostructured lipid carriers for loading multiple traditional Chinese medicine components for liver cancer treatment. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2020;33(1):109–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
