Skip to main content
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology logoLink to Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
. 2023 Oct 1;27(10):597–607. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3762

Distribution and Economic Burden of Diabetes-Related Microvascular Complications in Türkiye

Şuayıp Birinci 1,, Berna Simten Malhan 2
PMCID: PMC10541788  PMID: 37779367

Abstract

Background:

The aim of the study was to map microvascular complications associated with diabetes mellitus from personal health records and to guide chronic disease management by revealing the economic burden of the disease.

Method:

The data of patients with diabetes who developed microvascular complications were obtained from the e-Pulse database of the Ministry of Health, with the definitions of the disease. First, the distribution of patients by province and gender was determined and then patients with multiple complications were identified. Only direct costs and their distribution on the basis of complications were determined from the database according to the cost of illness methodology from the payer’s perspective. Then, average annual per-patient costs were determined using a top-down costing approach.

Results:

Between 2016 and 2020, a total of 7 656 700 patients with diabetes were reached. The number of patients with microvascular complications between 2016 and 2020 obtained from the e-Pulse database with the above definitions was 1 406 904. Regarding the complications, a total of 66 838 people developed nephropathy, 314 706 people developed retinopathy, and 1 084 843 people developed neuropathy. The total cost of patients with microvascular complications was $1 356 663 204.31 and the average annual cost per patient was $1096.21. The average annual cost of neuropathy is $659 862 971.96, retinopathy is $356 594 282.51 and nephropathy is $465 821 696.29, with per-patient costs of $701.82, $1495.24, and $10 516.11, respectively.

Conclusion:

Diabetes mellitus, with its microvascular complications, causes significant disease and economic burden. Türkiye’s national health database system, e-Pulse, is an important database that provides patient follow-up at both individual and population levels and helps with the management of the disease and taking preventive measures before the development of the complications.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus, economic burden of diabetes related microvascular complications, neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, personal health record


Highlights

  • Between 2016 and 2020, a total of number of 7 656 700 patients with diabetes were reached.

  • The total cost of patients with microvascular complications was $1 356 663 204.31, and the average annual cost per patient was $1096.21.

  • The number of patients with microvascular complications is 1 406 904. In terms of patient sex distribution: 534 124 were male (38%) and 872 780 (62%) were female.

  • On a provincial basis, the provinces with the highest number of complications were Gaziantep, Burdur, and Manisa, and the provinces with the lowest number were Ankara, Edirne, and Artvin.

Introduction

An electronic personal health record (PHR) is an electronic application through which individuals can access, manage, and share their own health information and the health information of others for whom they are authorized in a private, secure, and confidential environment. At a minimum, PHRs allow individuals to manually enter their health information on a website, which can then be accessed over the internet as needed. Advanced, interoperable PHRs can electronically transfer a patient’s clinical data from electronic health records (EHRs) of different hospitals, pharmacies, health insurers, and other institutions so that other health-care organizations can have access to the patient. In addition to storing and accessing clinical data, many PHRs provide secure patient–clinician messaging, prescription request and renewal features, access to high-quality educational materials, and other features designed to promote patient self-management and improved communication with health-care professionals.1

The collection of Turkish citizens’ health records electronically under the umbrella of “e-Nabız/e-Pulse” has been ongoing since 2015. The statisticalization and interpretation of these data is carried out through the SINA (Statistical Causation and Analyses in Health) system. In order to interpret the information from this system and provide added value to chronic disease management, this study focuses on diabetes mellitus (DM), which is of critical importance for Türkiye.2

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease with an increasing prevalence worldwide. In 2021, there were 537 million people living with DM, which causes significant disease burden and economic burden. According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), this number is projected to increase to 643 million in 2030 and 783 million in 2045. With a dramatic increase observed in all continents, it is obvious that it will create significant pressure on the health systems of countries.3

According to IDF estimates, 9 million people with diabetes live in Türkiye and the prevalence is estimated to be 15.9%. A cost study on diabetic patients in Türkiye was conducted by the SSI (Social Security Institution) in 2010 and was estimated at 10 billion Turkish liras (TL).4 In another study published in 2014, the estimated cost of diabetes to Türkiye was estimated to be in the range of 12.5 billion TL.5 In a report published in 2017, it was estimated that type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complication costs would reach 19 billion TL.6 In addition, complications cause serious negative health problems for the patient if they are not prevented and treated. In addition, while there is minimal resource utilization in case of precautions, the progression of the disease causes very high resource utilization, prolonged hospitalization, even disability, and early death.7

Prevention of acute and chronic complications and halting the progression of chronic complications are considered among the goals of diabetes treatment. The importance of increasing health literacy and access to primary health-care services is emphasized in preventing diabetes-related complications and reducing their effects.8 In Türkiye, the rate of individuals with diabetes with low treatment compliance and continuity can reach up to 40.4%, according to the results of a study conducted in a university hospital between October 2010 and October 2011. In the report published by IQVIA, when the CORE Diabetes Model is adapted by taking into account the level of T2DM treatment compliance and continuity in Türkiye, it is calculated that 7.42% of this cost (approximately 1.26 billion TL per year) is due to complications related to low T2DM treatment compliance and continuity. This avoidable expenditure and economic loss is only one dimension of the total cost of low T2DM treatment adherence and continuity; it is only associated with preventable complications.6

In this direction, we aimed to reveal the microvascular complication map of the disease for Türkiye and to determine the current economic burden of the disease by using the Ministry of Health digital database e-nabız for microvascular complications related to DM, which is known to be an important disease and economic burden.

Methods

In order to obtain data on microvascular complications of diabetes and diabetes-related patients, different definitions were made on the basis of both type 1 DM and T2DM and complications in order to obtain accurate data through the e-Pulse electronic registration system. In this definition, ICD (International Classification of Disease) data codes and patients who were in the system but did not meet the definitions but entered the system once with the correct ICD code were excluded. Microvascular complications were defined by the following criteria (Table 1). Based on the relevant ICD codes, patients with diabetes who developed microvascular complications in 2016-2020 were extracted from the system.

Table 1.

Definitions of DM Microvascular Complications

Microvascular complications 1 Nephropathy
①ICD10 Codes: E11.2 E13.2 E08.2, E09.2, E14.2 N18.x, I12, I13
OR
②Patients with kidney transplant (ICD Z94.0 or procedure P618610)
OR
③Patients on chronic dialysis program (with one of the procedures P704230 P704233 530710 704260 704270)
2 Retinopathy
①ICD10 Codes: E08.3 E09.3 E11.3 E13.3 E14.3 H36 H35.0 H35.3 H35.9
OR
Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
② Vitrectomy (SUT Code: P617660 or 617660 /P617640 or 617640 / P617650 or
617650 / 617640)
OR
Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema
③Macular Laser/Panretinal photocoagulation (SUT
Code: 617630 Laser photocoagulation)
OR
Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema
④Intravitreal injection (SUT code: 617620 AND ATC codes S01LA04 or S01LA05)
OR
Stable Diabetic Retinopathy
⑤Intravitreal injection (SUT code: 617620 and ATC code S01BA01)
3 Cataract
①ICD10: E08.36, E09.36, E10.36, E11.36, E13.36 H28 H26.2 H26.4 H26.8 H26.9
OR
②Those with cataract intervention (SUT Codes: P617341/P617342/P617540 / 617341
/ 617342 / 617540)
4 Neuropathy
①ICD10: E11.4 E14.4 G63.2
OR
②Use of pregabalin (N03AX) or duloxetine (N06AX21) or alpha-lipoic acid (A16AX01)

Launched in 2015 by the Ministry of Health, the e-Pulse system is a digital database where the personal health records of each individual who is a citizen of the Republic of Türkiye and has General Health Insurance are stored. The system contains the data of 68 million people. With the permission of the Ministry of Health, the E-95741342-708.01-206385672 number code was used to anonymize patient personal data, and patients were reached with the relevant codes. The reason for analyzing the data between 2016 and 2020 is that the e-Pulse system has been collecting data since 2015. The data were cleaned and were ready for analysis in 6 months. Between 2016 and 2020, a total of 7 656 700 patients (7 438 764 patients with T2DM and 217 936 patients with Type 1 DM) with diabetes were reached. Between 2016 and 2020, 1 406 904 patients who were diagnosed with DM and developed microvascular complications were identified. The provinces where these patients lived, the prevalence of the disease according to province, and the prevalence of retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy according to gender and province of residence were determined. Then, the economic burden of each complication according to the cost of disease method was determined from a payer perspective.

Cost of illness studies consisting of direct, indirect, and intangible costs can be presented differently according to the databases of countries and the data obtained. Moral costs are excluded from the studies since they cannot be quantified.9 In this study, only direct costs were calculated from the perspective of the reimbursing institution (SSI).

Direct cost is the money spent by individuals, insurance institutions, or the state for the care, cure, and prevention of a disease. It is the use or consumption of resources in the process of the direct treatment of a disease. Examples such as the use of time and knowledge of physicians, nurses, and medical care personnel, the use of machines and medical equipment, and the use of medicines and other consumables can be given for direct costs.9

Generally, direct costs are classified as direct medical and nondirect medical costs. This classification depends on whether the resource is used directly in treatment. Direct medical costs are the amount spent on outpatient clinic, other clinics, medical supplies, all laboratory or imaging tests, and interventions. Only direct medical costs were taken into consideration in the study.

For the calculation of direct disease costs, the method developed by Cowley et al10 on behalf of the World Bank (WB) and WHO was used. In the method, the clinical path is followed, and the number of uses of each expenditure item is multiplied by the percentage of cases using it and unit costs to reach the main total expenditure. The formulation used is as follows:

  • Unit cost of health services required to deliver the intervention (C)

  • Quantity of each type of service required for the intervention (V)

  • Number of people applying to the health institution for that service (n)

In the following equation, “i” denotes the service levels and “j” denotes the required services needed for the intervention. The equation assumes that there are s-types of appropriate services. If some of the services are not needed in the production of intervention j, the values of V will be 0.

graphic file with name ajc-27-10-597_eqn_001.jpg

Direct medical costs were obtained by multiplying the type and amount of service received by the utilization rate and unit cost.10 Total costs were then converted to per-patient costs based on the total number of patients using a top-down costing approach.

Results

Frequency Rate of Microvascular Complications in Patients with Diabetes

The number of patients with microvascular complications between 2016 and 2020, obtained from the e-Pulse database with the above definitions, was determined as 1 406 904. About 534 124 were male (38%) and 872 780 (62%) were female. On a provincial basis, the provinces with the highest number of complications were Gaziantep, Burdur, and Manisa, and the provinces with the lowest number were Ankara, Edirne, and Artvin (Table 2, Figure 1).

Table 2.

Number of People with DM Related Microvascular Complications (Türkiye)

Province Male Microvascular Complication Rate—Male Female Microvascular Complication Rate—Female Microvascular Complication Number Microvascular Complication Rate Total Diabetes Mellitus Patients
Adana 15 359 16.7 24 028 18.2 39 386 17.6 224  266
Adıyaman 2826 17.6 5041 19.7 7868 18.9 41 589
Afyonkarahisar 6387 19.0 12 220 22.0 18  609 20.9 89  123
Ağrı 1346 17.9 2680 21.8 4026 20.3 19 805
Amasya 2473 15.1 3925 16.1 6398 15.7 40 813
Ankara 28 065 13.2 47 462 15.3 75 529 14.4 523 944
Antalya 18 757 17.4 26 295 19.9 45 047 18.8 239 538
Artvin 1072 14.2 1532 15.9 2604 15.2 17 178
Aydın 11 371 20.1 16 977 22.6 28 346 21.5 131 762
Balıkesir 10 794 17.4 16 574 19.0 27 367 18.3 149 417
Bilecik 1590 17.0 2760 20.1 4351 18.8 23 123
Bingöl 1075 21.3 1527 20.5 2602 20.8 12 502
Bitlis 1314 22.4 2029 22.9 3343 22.7 14 731
Bolu 2235 15.3 3031 15.1 5265 15.2 34 707
Burdur 3351 23.9 4953 26.7 8303 25.5 32 560
Bursa 17 865 15.1 29 473 17.3 47 338 16.4 288 748
Çanakkale 4330 15.9 7124 18.6 11 455 17.5 65 449
Çankırı 2 212 18.5 3489 22.0 5701 20.5 27 773
Çorum 4241 17.0 7363 19.8 11 604 18.7 62 187
Denizli 11 977 20.8 18 157 23.5 30 132 22.3 134 877
Diyarbakır 4987 16.7 9756 20.2 14 744 18.9 78 189
Edirne 2932 14.2 4417 15.4 7348 14.9 49 461
Elazığ 3792 19.2 5747 19.7 9539 19.5 48 919
Erzincan 1549 16.8 2327 18.4 3875 17.7 21 864
Erzurum 3207 17.7 4720 18.6 7927 18.2 43 558
Eskişehir 6450 16.4 12 195 20.1 18 647 18.6 100 129
Gaziantep 15 548 24.8 28 664 28.1 44 215 26.8 164 682
Giresun 3809 17.0 6 862 20.8 10 672 19.2 55 490
Gümüşhane 867 17.9 1345 19.6 2212 18.9 11 712
Hakkâri 501 16.7 952 21.1 1453 19.3 7514
Hatay 10 914 17.3 15 510 19.9 26 422 18.7 140 986
Isparta 5162 22.8 7892 24.4 13 054 23.8 54 927
Mersin 14 322 18.2 21 469 20.7 35 789 19.6 182 442
İstanbul 82 124 15.0 132 777 17.1 214 900 16.2 1 325 186
İzmir 34 474 16.4 52 579 17.8 87 049 17.2 506 049
Kars 924 16.1 1531 19.5 2455 18.0 13 604
Kastamonu 4062 17.5 5592 18.6 9653 18.1 53 371
Kayseri 7723 15.9 13 101 17.9 20 825 17.1 121 524
Kırklareli 2777 15.4 4225 16.8 7002 16.2 43 270
Kırşehir 2029 17.4 3328 19.7 5357 18.8 28 489
Kocaeli 11  749 15.4 21 258 18.6 33 009 17.3 190 275
Konya 14 140 16.7 25 129 19.7 39 271 18.5 212 254
Kütahya 5855 19.9 10 438 23.4 16 294 22.0 73 947
Malatya 4215 14.9 6930 16.7 11 146 16.0 69 856
Manisa 16 308 24.3 26 357 26.3 42 665 25.5 167 396
Kahramanmaraş 6763 19.8 12 463 24.0 19 227 22.3 86 086
Mardin 2855 18.6 6082 24.7 8939 22.4 39 989
Muğla 8204 15.9 10 459 18.1 18 660 17.1 109 416
Muş 1212 20.0 2007 21.9 3219 21.1 15 254
Nevşehir 2091 15.6 3544 18.1 5634 17.1 32 900
Niğde 2314 17.5 4501 21.1 6816 19.7 34 530
Ordu 6673 19.0 12 132 22.7 18 806 21.2 88 750
Rize 2303 15.3 3382 17.7 5685 16.6 34 187
Sakarya 8090 19.3 13 159 21.7 21 249 20.7 102 510
Samsun 10 900 18.5 18 796 22.0 29 697 20.5 144 594
Siirt 1066 19.2 1902 23.0 2968 21.5 13 828
Sinop 2546 17.2 3726 19.2 6272 18.4 34 163
Sivas 4338 16.0 8286 19.4 12 626 18.1 69 765
Tekirdağ 6645 15.8 10 367 17.6 17 012 16.9 100 867
Tokat 5170 18.8 9950 22.8 15122 21.2 71 193
Trabzon 4698 14.8 7111 16.2 11 809 15.6 75 849
Tunceli 476 17.4 527 16.6 1003 17.0 5 908
Şanlıurfa 6818 19.0 11 859 22.8 18 678 21.3 87 782
Uşak 3488 17.8 5186 18.6 8674 18.3 47 483
Van 3614 21.3 5941 22.5 9555 22.0 43 406
Yozgat 3170 17.4 5464 19.2 8634 18.5 46 705
Zonguldak 5409 17.4 8928 20.0 14 338 18.9 75 678
Aksaray 2478 15.7 4630 18.9 7 108 17.7 40 253
Bayburt 417 15.4 620 18.3 1036 17.0 6099
Karaman 1905 19.7 3387 22.7 5292 21.5 24 569
Kırıkkale 2146 16.5 3678 18.3 5825 17.6 33 047
Batman 1803 17.7 3364 20.5 5167 19.4 26 585
Şırnak 1178 18.9 2410 22.6 3588 21.3 16 877
Bartın 2345 19.9 3876 24.0 6220 22.3 27 928
Ardahan 337 15.0 455 16.4 791 15.8 5015
Iğdır 759 18.9 1295 22.6 2054 21.1 9755
Yalova 1843 14.1 3046 16.2 4889 15.3 31 937
Karabük 2475 17.3 3745 19.6 6219 18.6 33 426
Kilis 1108 21.4 1867 24.7 2975 23.3 12 748
Osmaniye 4479 21.1 7690 25.5 12 169 23.7 51 394
Düzce 2946 19.4 5209 23.8 8155 22.0 37 039
Unknown 9570
534 124 17.0 872 780 19.4  1 406 904 18.4 7 656 700

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Prevalence of Microvascular Complications by Province, % (minimum–maximum 14.4%-26.8%).

The frequency rate of microvascular complications by district is presented in Figure 2. According to this detail, the Nizip district of Gaziantep had the highest frequency of microvascular complications (40.3%), while the Hamamözü district of Amasya had the lowest frequency rate (9.6%).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Prevalence of Microvascular Complications by District.

In terms of complications, there were a total of 66 838 people with nephropathy, 33 065 men (49%) and 33.773 women (51%). Its weight in microvascular complications is 5%. The highest prevalence is in Ardahan, Nevşehir, Rize, and Erzincan, and the lowest in Şanlıurfa, Uşak, Aksaray, and Denizli. The proportion of the population with a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value >7, which is considered uncontrolled, is 55%, 53.5%, 51.9%, and 50.1% in the provinces with the highest frequency of microvascular complications and 58.4%, 47.6%, 47.3%, and 40.4% in the provinces with the lowest frequency of complications, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3.

Patients Developing Nephropathy by Gender and Province (Türkiye)

City Male Female Total Patients
Adana 919 938 1857
Adıyaman 153 157 310
Afyonkarahisar 344 352 696
Ağrı 83 85 167
Amasya 176 179 355
Ankara 2025 2068 4093
Antalya 1290 1318 2608
Artvin 112 115 227
Aydın 758 774 1532
Balıkesir 576 589 1165
Bilecik 74 75 149
Bingöl 68 70 138
Bitlis 56 57 114
Bolu 172 175 347
Burdur 129 131 260
Bursa 1238 1265 2503
Çanakkale 258 264 523
Çankırı 123 125 248
Çorum 314 320 634
Denizli 443 453 896
Diyarbakır 261 266 527
Edirne 175 178 353
Elazığ 146 149 295
Erzincan 148 151 299
Erzurum 221 225 446
Eskişehir 404 412 816
Gaziantep 690 704 1394
Giresun 237 242 479
Gümüşhane 58 59 118
Hakkâri 29 29 58
Hatay 732 747 1479
Isparta 217 221 438
Mersin 720 736 1456
İstanbul 5778 5901 11679
İzmir 2199 2246 4444
Kars 53 54 107
Kastamonu 271 277 547
Kayseri 609 622 1231
Kırklareli 146 149 295
Kırşehir 151 154 306
Kocaeli 845 863 1708
Konya 754 770 1524
Kütahya 334 341 675
Malatya 258 264 523
Manisa 716 732 1448
Kahramanmaraş 298 305 603
Mardin 168 171 339
Muğla 557 569 1126
Muş 57 58 116
Nevşehir 192 196 388
Niğde 123 125 248
Ordu 481 492 973
Rize 258 264 523
Sakarya 562 574 1136
Samsun 592 604 1196
Siirt 52 53 105
Sinop 151 154 306
Sivas 296 303 599
Tekirdağ 378 386 764
Tokat 314 320 634
Trabzon 430 439 869
Tunceli 25 25 50
Şanlıurfa 206 211 417
Uşak 137 140 277
Van 187 191 378
Yozgat 204 209 413
Zonguldak 428 437 865
Aksaray 121 123 244
Bayburt 28 28 56
Karaman 91 93 184
Kırıkkale 132 135 266
Batman 73 74 147
Şırnak 62 64 126
Bartın 127 129 256
Ardahan 43 44 87
Iğdır 39 40 78
Yalova 158 162 320
Karabük 170 173 343
Kilis 55 56 112
Osmaniye 237 242 479
Düzce 173 176 349
Total 33 065 33 773 66 838

The total number of patients who developed retinopathy was 314 706, with 146 810 (47%) males and 167 896 (53%) females. Its weight in microvascular complications is 22%. When weighing the frequency of diabetes, Gaziantep, Burdur, Manisa, and Osmaniye have the highest frequency and Ankara, Bolu, and Ardahan have the lowest frequency. The proportion of the population with HbA1c values > 7 in these provinces is 50.9% in Gaziantep, 40.9% in Burdur, 40.8% in Manisa, 46.4% in Osmaniye, 40.3% in Ankara, 43.7% in Bolu, and 55% in Ardahan (Table 4).

Table 4.

Patients with Retinopathy According to Gender and Province

City Male Female Total Patients
Adana 4715  5231 9946
Adıyaman 636 894 1530
Afyonkarahisar 1820 2243 4063
Ağrı 235 344 579
Amasya 645 822 1467
Ankara 9160 10 655 19 815
Antalya 4548 3915 8462
Artvin 321 322 643
Aydın 3223 3120 6343
Balıkesir 3028 3384 6412
Bilecik 330 422 752
Bingöl 285 313 598
Bitlis 260 329 589
Bolu 627 661 1288
Burdur 989 1009 1998
Bursa 4643 5349 9991
Çanakkale 1232 1255 2487
Çankırı 631 723 1354
Çorum 1116 1461 2577
Denizli 3172 3267 6439
Diyarbakır 1034 1438 2472
Edirne 617 555 1172
Elazığ 937 1107 2044
Erzincan 442 476 919
Erzurum 552 604 1157
Eskişehir 1268 1605 2873
Gaziantep 3302 4013 7315
Giresun 1045 1209 2254
Gümüşhane 252 259 511
Hakkâri 110 140 250
Hatay 2703 2511 5214
Isparta 1531 1998 3529
Mersin 3680 3907 7587
İstanbul 26 377 29 290 55 667
İzmir 10 066 11 347 21 413
Kars 180 183 364
Kastamonu 1 337 1288 2625
Kayseri 2070 2799 4869
Kırklareli 730 647 1376
Kırşehir 521 687 1208
Kocaeli 3195 3972 7167
Konya 3415 4278 7693
Kütahya 1384 1857 3241
Malatya 1280 1520 2800
Manisa 5193 6214 11 407
Kahramanmaraş 1708 2044 3753
Mardin 554 836 1390
Muğla 2628 2014 4642
Muş 283 365 648
Nevşehir 526 704 1230
Niğde 561 711 1272
Ordu 1458 1902 3360
Rize 566 507 1073
Sakarya 2291 2700 4991
Samsun 2636 3264 5900
Siirt 200 273 472
Sinop 751 782 1532
Sivas 1177 1612 2790
Tekirdağ 1428 1495 2923
Tokat 1737 2544 4281
Trabzon 1315 1443 2759
Tunceli 137 114 251
Şanlıurfa 1292 1611 2904
Uşak 832 922 1754
Van 647 713 1360
Yozgat 1112 1390 2502
Zonguldak 1149 1407 2556
Aksaray 619 805 1424
Bayburt 90 128 218
Karaman 438 545 983
Kırıkkale 512 758 1270
Batman 386 625 1011
Şırnak 259 381 640
Bartın 620 893 1513
Ardahan 93 83 175
Iğdır 148 205 354
Yalova 543 604 1148
Karabük 773 836 1609
Kilis 318 340 658
Osmaniye 1105 1259 2364
Düzce 1,078 1459 2537
Türkiye 146 810 167 896 314 706

The total number of patients with DM-related neuropathy was 1 084 843, with 377 852 men (35%), and 706 991 women (65%) experiencing neuropathy complications. The highest rates were observed in Gaziantep (22.8%), Burdur (20.1%), and Manisa (19.3%). In these provinces, the population of patients with diabetes with HbA1c values > 7 was 50.9% in Gaziantep, 40.9% in Burdur, and 40.8% in Manisa (Table 5).

Table 5.

Patients with Neuropathy by Gender and Province

City Male Female Total Patients
Adana 10 595 19 116 29 710
Adıyaman 2164 4181 6345
Afyonkarahisar 4529 10 115 14 645
Ağrı 1059 2287 3347
Amasya 1763 3087 4851
Ankara 17 977 36 654 54 634
Antalya 13 693 22 308 35 997
Artvin 682 1182 1864
Aydın 7961 13 973 21 933
Balıkesir 7699 13 330 21 028
Bilecik 1255 2359 3613
Bingöl 791 1213 2004
Bitlis 1045 1686 2731
Bolu 1520 2330 3849
Burdur 2458 4074 6532
Bursa 12 679 23 877 36 557
Çanakkale 3051 5867 8919
Çankırı 1563 2805 4368
Çorum 3022 5932 8954
Denizli 8961 15 251 24 211
Diyarbakır 3842 8231 12 074
Edirne 2230 3757 5986
Elazığ 2884 4741 7624
Erzincan 1027 1816 2843
Erzurum 2468 3998 6465
Eskişehir 5030 10 516 15 547
Gaziantep 12 313 25 164 37 479
Giresun 2703 5693 8398
Gümüşhane 603 1081 1684
Hakkâri 378 805 1183
Hatay 7984 12 952 20 934
Isparta 3764 6187 9950
Mersin 10 641 17 805 28 444
İstanbul 53 278 102 764 156 045
İzmir 23 670 41 133 64 800
Kars 720 1338 2058
Kastamonu 2690 4356 7046
Kayseri 5346 10 223 15 569
Kırklareli 2007 3546 5553
Kırşehir 1445 2646 4091
Kocaeli 8204 17 223 25 429
Konya 10 546 21 010 31 557
Kütahya 4304 8624 12 928
Malatya 2833 5421 8255
Manisa 11 449 20 834 32 282
Kahramanmaraş 5071 10 630 15 703
Mardin 2239 5263 7503
Muğla 5406 8473 13 878
Muş 923 1658 2581
Nevşehir 1460 2791 4251
Niğde 1702 3817 5520
Ordu 5063 10 213 15 277
Rize 1587 2783 4370
Sakarya 5568 10 386 15 954
Samsun 8204 15 697 23 901
Siirt 842 1646 2489
Sinop 1727 2944 4671
Sivas 3060 6685 9747
Tekirdağ 5077 8829 13 906
Tokat 3444 7703 11 148
Trabzon 3138 5505 8642
Tunceli 346 402 747
Şanlıurfa 5576 10 393 15 969
Uşak 2647 4304 6950
Van 2898 5224 8122
Yozgat 2021 4091 6113
Zonguldak 3986 7333 11 319
Aksaray 1825 3853 5679
Bayburt 315 492 808
Karaman 1470 2908 4378
Kırıkkale 1601 2930 4531
Batman 1420 2767 4187
Şırnak 888 1982 2870
Bartın 1733 3066 4799
Ardahan 213 351 563
Iğdır 605 1086 1691
Yalova 1214 2388 3602
Karabük 1675 2951 4625
Kilis 804 1557 2361
Osmaniye 3399 6515 9913
Düzce 1876 3884 5761
Türkiye 377 852 706 991 1 084 843

Cost of Microvascular Complications

For 2020, the costs of patients with microvascular complications were calculated from a reimburser perspective. The dollar exchange rate was taken as the average for 2020 ($1 = 7.006 TL). The total cost of patients with microvascular complications from the total number of DM patients is $1356 663 204.31 per year, with inpatient (41%), intervention (22%), and outpatient (16%) treatments accounting for the highest cost. The share of drugs and medical supplies in total cost is 20%. The average annual cost per patient was $1096.21 (Table 6).

Table 6.

Cost of Microvascular Complications

Cost ($) Share of Total Cost Cost Per Patient ($)
Oral antidiabetics 85 371 151.76 6% 63.04
Needle tip and strip 15 580 426.72 1% 11.50
Insulin 175 525 418.71 13% 129.61
Outpatient 217 860 095.57 16% 160.87
Inpatient 557 367 293.61 41% 472.60
Intervention 304 958 817.95 22% 258.58
Total 1 356 663 204.31 100% 1096.21

The average 1-year total cost of patients with neuropathy from microvascular complications is $659 862 971.96, with the highest cost item being inpatient treatments (36%). This was followed by drugs and medical supplies (29%) and outpatient treatments (23%). The average annual cost per patient was $701.82 (Table 7).

Table 7.

Cost of Neuropathy Complication

Cost ($) Share of Total Cost Cost Per Patient ($)
Oral antidiabetics 67 291 122.98 10% 62.35
Needle tip and strip 109 393 522.77 17% 101.36
Insulin 10 613 244.00 2% 9.83
Outpatient 154 895 646.33 23% 143.52
Inpatient 237 418 502.64 36% 252.51
Intervention 80 250 933.24 12% 85.35
Total 659 862 971.96 100% 701.82

The total cost of retinopathy from microvascular complications is $356 594 282.51, with the highest cost in inpatient treatments (40%), followed by drugs and medical supplies (26%), and intervention (20%). The total annual average cost per patient was $1495.24 (Table 8).

Table 8.

Retinopathy Complication Cost ($)

Cost ($) Share of Total Cost Cost Per Patient ($)
Oral antidiabetics 20 535 767.64 6% 78.36
Needle tip and strip 68 637 546.83 19% 261.91
Insulin 5 084 155.69 1% 19.40
Outpatient 50 907 939.84 14% 194.26
Inpatient 141 542 315.79 40% 593.50
Intervention 69 886 556.73 20% 293.04
Total 356 594 282.51 100% 1495.24

Finally, the total annual cost of patients with nephropathy is $465 821 696.29, with the largest cost item being inpatient treatment at 50% and intervention at 41%. The annual cost per patient is $10 516.11 (Table 9).

Table 9.

Cost of Nephropathy Complications ($)

Cost ($) Share of Total Cost Cost Per Patient ($)
Oral antidiabetics 1 675 960.29 0,4% 27.32
Needle tip and strip 12 165 550.85 3% 198.29
Insulin 933 553.18 0,2% 15.22
Outpatient 25 180 939.66 5% 410.44
Inpatient 234 019 930.58 50% 5283.09
Intervention 191 845 761.73 41% 4331.00
Total 465 821 696.29 100% 10516.11

Discussion

Türkiye’s population is aging and the burden of chronic diseases is increasing, forcing health-care organizations to seek innovations for the efficient and effective care of these patients. In order to make the most effective use of scarce resources allocated to health, PHRs offer important outputs. Thanks to the outputs obtained, it is possible to ensure proper treatment, prevention of complications, and control of the disease. Personal health records can be used for a variety of purposes but may have the greatest potential clinical value in chronic disease management, which requires continuity of care and long-term follow-up. In Europe, Estonia is among the leading countries with e-prescription and digital health infrastructure. National electronic patient records are kept in a system called the Estonian National Health Information System (ENHIS), which includes all disease histories of the entire population of the country and where health data is recorded. The system has facilitated the early diagnosis of diseases, and thus treatment processes have been both correctly managed and shortened.11 Another example of a country whose citizens trust its health infrastructure is Denmark. On the portal developed, citizens’ health histories are stored with an identification number. Israel started a similar health digitalization project in 1995.12 In Israel, e-prescription, telemedicine, and online access to health data have been implemented within the scope of health services organizations. Another important example is Spain. There are digital health projects in different regions of the country with their own budgets.11 The costs associated with diabetes and related conditions are rising even higher. Diabetes can be successfully managed, and associated complications can be prevented, especially if it is diagnosed and treated early.13 Significant advances and global initiatives in chronic disease management have focused on leveraging digital health solutions such as mobile apps, wearables, remote monitoring systems, EHRs and disease management platforms. Electronic health record digitally store patients’ medical histories, lab results, allergy information, drug prescriptions, and treatment plans, allowing health-care providers and patients to easily access and share them. These systems enable better and faster decisions in chronic disease management, help patients adjust treatment plans based on their current condition, and improve continuity of care.

In this study, the total cost of patients with microvascular complications was $1 356 663 204.31, and the average annual cost per patient was $1096.21. The highest complication cost belongs to patients who developed nephropathy, and the average annual cost is $10 516.11. Then retinopathy had an average annual cost per patient of $1495.24, and neuropathy had an average annual cost per patient of $701.82. Of the total costs for patients with microvascular complications, inpatient treatment at 41% and intervention at 22% accounted for the highest cost. The total annual cost of neuropathy was $659 862 971.96, and the cost of retinopathy was $356 594 282.51. On a provincial basis, the provinces with the highest complications have a large population whose HbA1c value cannot be controlled according to population weight.

The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and other studies have clearly demonstrated that glycemic control is important in DM.14,15 For every 1% decrease in HbA1c levels in T2DM, DM-related mortality can be reduced by 25% and all-cause mortality by 7%. A 1% reduction in HbA1c also leads to an 18% reduction in the prevalence of myocardial infarction (AMI), a 16% reduction in the development of heart failure (congestive heart failure), a 43% reduction in lower limb amputations, a 12% reduction in the development of stroke, and a 35% risk reduction in microvascular complications. There is also a 34% risk reduction in the development of microalbuminuria with tight blood glucose control. The results of the UKPDS and some other epidemiologic studies have shown that an HbA1c level of 7% and a systolic blood pressure below 130 mmHg reduce the risk of chronic complications.14,15 For type 1 DM, a 1% decrease in HbA1c reduces the risk of retinopathy by 35%, neuropathy by 30%, and nephropathy by 24%-44%.16

In general, if there is no special condition that increases the risk of hypoglycemia in T2DM and life expectancy is long enough, it should be preferred to set the HbA1c target at ≤7.0% (53 mmol/mol) to reduce microvascular complications. In order to manage the complications that arise according to the study results and to protect patients who have not yet developed complications, the course of the disease should be well followed, the health literacy of patients should be increased, and awareness should be raised. The distribution of patients with microvascular complications on a provincial basis is known from this study, so preventive and preventive medicine services should be mobilized in accordance with the regional conditions. Follow-up of DM patients should primarily be performed by the family medicine system, and patient education should be ensured. In order to eliminate risk factors, both primary care and secondary care should take an active role, and measures to reduce risk factors (such as smoking cessation) should be developed.

Study Limitations

The number of patients with microvascular complications is expected to be much higher, according to previously published national data. The frequency of nephropathy is given as 5% of the microvascular complications in this study. This is a much lower rate when compared to the previous national reports published so far. The frequency of diabetic kidney disease is given as between 20% and 30% of the patient population with diabetes.17 Using the ICD codes alone would inevitably miss patients without ICD codes but with albuminuria or low glomerular filtration rate. Because many of the clinicians do not use these codes in their daily practice. That is why analyses were made based on data from the relevant ICD codes, as far as the available data allowed. We think that using ICD codes alone would inevitably miss many subjects who were not registered with codes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, these and similar cost-of-illness studies reveal the economic burden that society has to bear when any member of society suffers from a disease. This will provide important evidence on how much of the scarce resources allocated to health care are spent on which diseases, how to prevent these diseases, and how to ensure efficiency through proper resource allocation. It is essential to ensure the continuity of studies. Diabetes mellitus causes significant disease burden and economic burden. For the management of the disease, patients can be followed up thanks to the e-Pulse system in Türkiye. By using this important resource, disease management can be achieved with correct and appropriate interventions, and complications can be prevented.

Funding Statement

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

Footnotes

Ethics Committee Approval: Anonymous data usage decision approval was provided by the Ministry of Health at the date of January 5, 2023. Approval number: E-95741342-708.01-206385672.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions: Concept – Ş.B., B.S.M.; Design – Ş.B., B.S.M.; Supervision – Ş.B., B.S.M.; Resources – Ş.B., B.S.M.; Materials – Ş.B., B.S.M.; Data Collection and/or Processing – Ş.B., B.S.M.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – Ş.B., B.S.M.; Literature Search – Ş.B., B.S.M.; Writing – Ş.B., B.S.M.; Critical Review – Ş.B., B.S.M.

Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  • 1. Birinci Ş. A digital opportunity for patients to manage their health: Turkey national personal health record system (the e-Nabız). Balk Med J. 2023;40(3):215 221. ( 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2023.2023-2-77) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Birinci Ş. An Example of Chronic Disease Management in Türkiye: Macrovascular Complication Due to Diabetes Mellitus [PhD thesis]. Istanbul: Üsküdar Üniversitesi; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. International Diabetes Federation; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. SSI. Social security Incopration. Istanbul: Turk Uluslararası Diyabet Liderler Zirvesi. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Malhan S, Öksüz E, Babineaux SM, Ertekin A, Palmer JP. Assessment of the direct medical costs of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications in Turkey. Turk J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(2):39 43. ( 10.4274/tjem.2441) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. IQVIA. Improving Compliance and Continuity in Type 2 Diabetes Treatment in Turkey. IQVIA Institute; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Einarson TR, Acs A, Ludwig C, Panton UH. Economic burden of cardiovascular disease in Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Value Health. 2018;21(7):881 890. ( 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.019) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. National Diabetes Consensus Group. Diabetes Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines. Istanbul: Türkiye Diabetes Foundation; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Rascati KL. Essentials of pharmacoeconomics. J Comm Biotechnol. 2009;15(1):92 94. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cowley P, Bodabilla L, Musgrove P, Saxenian H. Content and Financing of an Essential National Package of Health Services, Global Assessments in the Health Sector. World Health Organization; 1994:171 181. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Dijital sağlık: Başkalarından öğrenmek. deutschland.de. Available at: https://www.deutschland.de/tr/topic/bilim/dijital-saglik-hizmetleri-baska-ulkelerden-ogrenmek. (Published January 3, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Williams J, Malden S, Heeney C, et al. Optimizing hospital electronic prescribing systems: a systematic scoping review. J Patient Saf. 2022;18(2):e547 e562. ( 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000867) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Yeaw J, Halinan S, Hines D, et al. Direct medical costs for complications among children and adults with diabetes in the US commercial payer setting. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12(2):219 230. ( 10.1007/s40258-014-0086-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Turner RC. Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). JAMA. 1999;281(21):2005 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837 853. ( 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, Nathan DM, Genuth S, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977 986. ( 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Süleymanlar G, Utaş C, Arinsoy T, et al. A population-based survey of Chronic REnal disease in Turkey–the CREDIT study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(6):1862 1871. ( 10.1093/ndt/gfq656) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anatolian Journal of Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Turkish Society of Cardiology

RESOURCES