Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1987 Oct;85(2):542–547. doi: 10.1104/pp.85.2.542

On the Nature and Origin of the Calcium Asymmetry Arising during Gravitropic Response in Etiolated Pea Epicotyls 1

Fernando Migliaccio 1, Arthur W Galston 1
PMCID: PMC1054291  PMID: 11539707

Abstract

Seven day old etiolated pea epicotyls were loaded symmetrically with 3H-indole 3-acetic acid (IAA) or 45Ca2+, then subjected to 1.5 hours of 1g gravistimulation. Epidermal peels taken from top and bottom surfaces after 90 minutes showed an increase in IAA on the lower side and of Ca2+ on the upper side. Inhibitors of IAA movement (TIBA, 9-hydroxyfluorene carboxylic acid) block the development of both IAA and Ca2+ asymmetries, but substances known to interfere with normal Ca2+ transport (nitrendipine, nisoldipine, Bay K 8644, A 23187) do not significantly alter either IAA or Ca2+ asymmetries. These substances, however, are active in modifying both Ca2+ uptake and efflux through oat and pea leaf protoplast membranes. We conclude that the 45Ca2+ fed to pea epicotyls occurs largely in the cell wall, and that auxin movement is primary and Ca2+ movement secondary in gravitropism. We hypothesize that apoplastic Ca2+ changes during graviresponse because it is displaced by H+ secreted through auxin-induced proton release. This proposed mechanism is supported by localized pH experiments, in which filter paper soaked in various buffers was applied to one side of a carborundum-abraded epicotyls. Buffer at pH 3 increases calcium loss from the side to which it is applied, whereas pH 7 buffer decreases it. Moreover, 10 micromolar IAA and 1 micromolar fusicoccin, which promote H+ efflux, increase Ca2+ release from pea epicotyl segments, whereas cycloheximide, which inhibits H+ efflux, has the reverse effect. We suggest that Ca2+ does not redistribute actively during gravitropism: the asymmetry arises because of its release from the wall adjacent to the region of high IAA concentration, proton secretion, and growth. Thus, the asymmetric distribution of Ca2+ appears to be a consequence of growth stimulation, not a critical step in the early phase of the graviresponse.

Full text

PDF
542

Images in this article

543Fig. 1
on p.543
543Fig. 2
on p.543

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bandurski R. S., Schulze A., Dayanandan P., Kaufman P. B. Response to gravity by Zea mays seedlings. I. Time course of the response. Plant Physiol. 1984;74:284–288. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.2.284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chandra S., Chabot J. F., Morrison G. H., Leopold A. C. Localization of calcium in amyloplasts of root-cap cells using ion microscopy. Science. 1982 Jun 11;216(4551):1221–1223. doi: 10.1126/science.216.4551.1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cleland R. E. Reevaluation of the Effect of Calcium Ions on Auxin-induced Elongation. Plant Physiol. 1977 Nov;60(5):709–712. doi: 10.1104/pp.60.5.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daye S., Biro R. L., Roux S. J. Inhibition of gravitropism in oat coleoptiles by the calcium chelator, ethyleneglycol-bis-(beta-aminoethyl ether)-N,N'-tetraacetic acid. Physiol Plant. 1984 Jul;61(3):449–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1984.tb06354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Godfraind T. Mechanisms of action of calcium entry blockers. Fed Proc. 1981 Dec;40(14):2866–2871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee J. S., Mulkey T. J., Evans M. L. Inhibition of polar calcium movement and gravitropism in roots treated with auxin-transport inhibitors. Planta. 1984;160:536–543. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee J. S., Mulkey T. J., Evans M. L. Reversible loss of gravitropic sensitivity in maize roots after tip application of calcium chelators. Science. 1983 Jun 24;220(4604):1375–1376. doi: 10.1126/science.220.4604.1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Migliaccio F., Rayle D. L. Sequence of key events in shoot gravitropism. Plant Physiol. 1984 May;75(1):78–81. doi: 10.1104/pp.75.1.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pickard B. G. Early events in geotropism of seedling shoots. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1985;36:55–75. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.36.060185.000415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sievers A., Behrens H. M., Buckhout T. J., Gradmann D. Can a Ca2+ pump in the endoplasmic reticulum of the Lepidium root be the trigger for rapid changes in membrane potential after gravistimulation? J Plant Physiol. 1984 Apr;114(3):195–200. doi: 10.1016/s0044-328x(84)80010-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Slocum R. D., Gaynor J. J., Galston A. W. Cytological and ultrastructural studies on root tissues. Ann Bot. 1984 Nov;54(Suppl 3):65–76. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Slocum R. D., Roux S. J. An improved method for the subcellular localization of calcium using a modification of the antimonate precipitation technique. J Histochem Cytochem. 1982 Jul;30(7):617–629. doi: 10.1177/30.7.6179981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith R. D. Calcium entry blockers: key issues. Fed Proc. 1983 Feb;42(2):201–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES