Skip to main content
NCBI home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Maltreat. 2023 Jul 25;28(4):556–562. doi: 10.1177/10775595231191395

Intergenerational Continuity of Child Maltreatment, Parenting, and Racism: Commentary on Valentino et al., (2012)

Kristin Valentino 1, Jenny Zhen-Duan 2, Jenny Padilla 1, Donte Bernard 3
PMCID: PMC10543487  NIHMSID: NIHMS1928779  PMID: 37491779

Abstract

Recent editorials published in Child Maltreatment bring much needed attention to racism in child maltreatment reporting and investigation. In this commentary, we extend these efforts by responding to Valentino et al., (2012) and addressing prior omissions in our race-related work by explicitly discussing the role of racism in our explanation of key study findings. Together with scholars with expertise in the impact of racism on children and families, this commentary (a) discusses theoretical models of child maltreatment and of the influence of racism on parenting and child development; (b) discusses parental responses to racism in relation to the Valentino et al., (2012) findings; and (c) highlights future research directions.

Keywords: child maltreatment, racism, parenting, authoritarian parenting, intergenerational continuity

Introduction

The recent editorials published in Child Maltreatment (Briggs-King, et al., 2023; Palusci et al., 2023) bring much needed attention to racism in child maltreatment reporting and investigation. The first editorial details the history of systemic racism and child welfare in the United States and describes the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children’s (APSAC) commitment to an anti-racist publication process. It outlines specific commitments from APSAC towards the goals of promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) across all stages of publishing with a focus on representation, process, and content (Briggs-King et al., 2023). Further, the editorial written by the editorial leadership of Child Maltreatment, expands on APSAC’s position on DEIJ, affirms the journal’s commitment and plans for addressing these issues, and highlights new articles that further our understanding of race and racism in the child welfare and child protection system (Palusci et al., 2023). Both editorials provide important commitments to anti-racist science at the level of the journal.

There are also actions we may take as individual scholars to address racism in child welfare, and to respond and amend prior omissions in our work on racism-related issues. Racism is defined as “a system of dominance, power, and privilege based on racial group designations; rooted in the historical oppression of a group defined or perceived by dominant-group members as inferior, deviant or undesirable” (Harrell, 2000, p. 43). Systemic racism emphasizes policies and practices that leads to organized and sustained oppression whereas interpersonal racism tends to play out in individual racialized aggression and violence, both of which reinforce the belief that certain racial groups are inferior to others (Jones, 1972; Williams, & Williams-Morris, 2000). In this commentary, we respond to Valentino et al. (2012), by specifically discussing the role of racism as a possible explanation for key study findings. Valentino et al. (2012), examined exosystemic (i.e., community violence) and microsystemic (i.e., parenting) factors hypothesized to be involved in the intergenerational continuity of child abuse, and examined whether families’ race moderated these associations. Among mothers with a history of child abuse, higher exposure to community violence and lower authoritarian parenting attitudes were associated with increased risk for intergenerational continuity of abuse. However, the protective effects of authoritarian parenting, characterized by higher parental control and lower warmth, were limited to Black1 families only. Although we grappled with the meaning and potential explanations of these race-related differences in parenting and their impact on child abuse, the discussion never directly addresses racism and the ways in which experiences of racism shape parenting in different racial-ethic groups. Together with scholars with expertise in the impact of racism on children and families, this commentary addresses this oversight by: a) discussing theoretical models of child maltreatment and of the influence of racism on parenting and child development; b) discussing parental responses to racism in relation to the Valentino et al., (2012) findings; and c) highlighting future research directions.

Theoretical Models

Grounded in a developmental psychopathology perspective, we currently understand child maltreatment as a phenomenon that emerges out of a complex pattern of maladaptation across time and multiple levels of ecology (Valentino, & Edler, 2022). The Ecological-Transactional Model of Child Maltreatment (Cicchetti & Lynch, 1995; Cicchetti & Valentino, 2006) provides a framework of how processes at each level of the child’s ecology may exert reciprocal or transactional influences on each other to explain the emergence of child maltreatment and to shape the course of child development. The Ecological-Transactional model focuses on four levels of ecology in which the individual is embedded. The most distal ecological level is the macrosystem, including cultural values and beliefs. Embedded within this level is the exosystem, which includes community-level factors (e.g., community violence, neighborhood racial concentrations). Even more proximal to the child is the microsystem, which refers to the child’s immediate contexts such as the family or school communities. Finally, the model includes emphasis on the ontogenic level of development, which are processes operating at the individual level such as emotional and physiological regulation.

The ecological-transactional perspective emphasizes that risk and protective factors associated with child maltreatment are present at each level of ecology. Consistent with other ecological frameworks, factors operating at levels more proximal to the child are expected to have a greater influence on child development relative to factors operating at more distal levels of ecology (e.g., Cecil et al., 2014). Accordingly, research on child maltreatment has typically focused most on proximal (micro-system) level processes relative to factors that are at more distal levels (macro-system). Thus, despite the well-documented influence of context and culture on children’s health and development in the past several decades, especially with regard to the association between racism and child development (GarcíaColl et al., 1996; Iruka et al., 2022; Priest et al., 2013; Quintana et al., 2006; Shonkoff et al., 2021; Valrie et al., 2020); efforts to understand more macro influences on child maltreatment have lagged behind. This problem is not unique to research on child maltreatment; related fields, such as clinical science, have also raised awareness of the lack of research on macrosystem factors, including racism, in particular (Buchanan, & Wiklund, 2020).

Although there has been explicit acknowledgment that risk and protective factors may influence other factors at the same level (horizontally) and across levels (vertically) over time (Cicchetti, & Lynch, 1995; Cicchetti, & Valentino, 2006), there has been relatively little evaluation of macro-level risk and protective processes in child maltreatment research, or discussion of how risk factors (e.g., racism) or protective factors (e.g., cultural values) may influence processes, such as parenting, at other ecological levels in relation to child maltreatment, specifically. Importantly, the influence of risk and protective factors at the macro level on and across other ecological levels of analyses have been elaborated in theoretical models of minority youth development (e.g., Cross et al., 2022; GarcíaColl et al., 1996).

Garcia-Coll et al.’s (1996) integrative developmental model of minority youth development posits that racism, discrimination, segregation, and marginalization create conditions that directly affect the family’s social environments, including parenting practices. This model is seminal and innovative from prior ecological frameworks of child development for introducing constructs associated with social position and social stratification, including racism, at the core, rather than at the periphery of theory on child development. In particular, this integrative model posits that racism has direct and indirect effects on children and the multiple ecological levels in which they are embedded and highlights the complex ways that parenting behaviors are influenced by racism, discrimination and oppression (García-Coll et al., 1996). Indeed, in studies with Black mother-youth dyads, Murry et al., (2022) found that mother’s experiences of racism impacted her psychological functioning, which in turn were associated with more negative parenting styles and worsened parent and child relationship quality. Similar trends were observed with African American family triads, such that youth’s reports of racial discrimination were associated with poorer relationship quality with fathers and mothers, and lower mother-child warmth (Riina, & McHale, 2012). In both studies, the authors (Murry et al., 2022; Riina, & McHale, 2012) conceptualized the phenomenon within the emotional spillover framework, which posits that stress experienced in one context can spillover to a different context and affect family functioning (Bolger et al., 1989). Racism, in its multiple forms, adversely affects Black families and consequently spills over into everyday life functioning, proliferating stress, disrupting attachment-based and cooperative parenting efforts through increased familial conflict (Brody et al., 2008; Murry et al., 2022; Williams, 2018). It is worth noting that both parents’ and youth’s individual experiences of racism impact parent and youth relationship quality, highlighting that one family member’s experience of racism can negatively impact the entire family dynamic. Thus, while previous models of ecological theory define the macrosystem as a system that affects “attitudes and ideologies of culture” as a separate entity, we see here that prejudicial beliefs and discriminatory practices permeate across all systems and negatively impact child development (Vélez-Agosto et al., 2017).

Racism and Child Maltreatment

Racism, described analogous to an endemic virus, is ever present in society and affects development since before the child’s conception and the negative effects persist until death (Anderson et al., 2022; Gee et al., 2012; Jones et al., 2020). The adverse effects of racism have been documented in maternal and infant health outcomes (Margerison-Zilko et al., 2017; Mehra et al., 2017), educational experiences (e.g., Bates, & Glick, 2013), places of residence (Phelan, & Link, 2015), community violence (Burrell et al., 2021), healthcare experiences (Peek et al., 2010; Wren Serbin, & Donnelly, 2016), and even mortality rates (Chae et al., 2015; Siegel et al., 2022). Specific to Black youth, racism is a unique adverse childhood experience that must be conceptualized within the understanding that it draws from historical/generational traumatic experiences of their ancestors (Bernard et al., 2020) and impacts neurodevelopment, socioemotional and cognitive well-being, health behaviors, and health outcomes (e.g., Assari & Mincy, 2021; Becares et al., 2015; Rosenthal et al., 2018). The evidence is clear, Black youth, compared to their white peers, are disproportionately impacted by the adverse childhood experiences of maltreatment and household dysfunction (Maguire-Jack et al., 2020; Zhang, & Monnet, 2021). Racial biases, including those among child protection workers, and systemic racism contribute to racial disproportionality and disparity in the child welfare system (Miller et al., 2013; Stephens, 2022), even after controlling for socioeconomic factors (Dettlaff et al., 2011). Indeed, children of color are at greater risk of child protection reports (Fontes, 2005). Further, Black and Latinx children are more likely to be removed from their homes and placed into foster care, to remain in care longer, and have more placement disruptions/changes, and are also less likely to be reunified with their parents (Hill, 2008). Clearly, greater efforts to evaluate structural racism and to delineate how it affects both risk for child maltreatment directly, and indirectly through processes operating at other ecological levels, are important priorities for future research.

Relevance for Valentino et al., 2012

In Valentino et al., (2012) authoritarian parenting attitudes, characterized by higher parental control and lower parental warmth, were identified as protective against the intergenerational continuity of child abuse for Black families only. The discussion highlights that authoritarian parenting may be associated with more positive outcomes for Black families because higher control over children in environments where families experience daily threat is both adaptive and appropriate (e.g., Furstenberg et al., 1989). In further discussing the threats that Black families may face, however, the discussion points to high rates of community violence, rather than considering the threat of racism. As such, the discussion wonders why there would be differences in the function of authoritarian parenting between Black and white families, if they are living in the same neighborhoods with the same levels of exposure to community violence. An obvious answer, of course, is that Black families are navigating exposure to racism whereas white families are not, and this has important implications for parenting behavior. Indeed, recent work estimates that Black adolescents average over five discrimination experiences each day (English et al., 2020), and that parental experiences of discrimination can increase parent-child conflict in the home (Galán et al., 2022).

In the context of racism, Black parents approach parenting in complex ways to prepare their children to navigate a society in which they are marginalized (Hughes et al., 2006). Black mothers may be concerned that their parenting, or their children’s behavior, may be judged more negatively in the context of racism (Cauce et al., 1996; Hill, 1995). As such, they may engage in more limit setting and have narrower expectations for acceptable child behavior compared to white mothers to ensure their children avoid scrutiny and harm (LeCuyer, & Swanson, 2017; Thomas, & Blackmon, 2015). Indeed, LeCuyer (2017) note that “higher levels of ‘restrictive’ attitudes can be seen as protective and prudent under socially inequitable conditions (p. 838).” Thus, parenting behaviors and attitudes that value parental control (i.e., authoritarian styles) may be adaptive for Black families (Cole, & Tan, 2007). Moreover, it is important to be clear that parenting is multi-dimensional and that Black families are not a monolith. Therefore, the endorsement of higher authoritarian parenting attitudes among Black mothers compared to white mothers, does not preclude the presence of other positive, supportive, or protective parenting behaviors that Black mothers may engage in to balance the more restrictive attitudes they hold to help their children navigate a highly racialized society.

Lastly, it is important to acknowledge that the protective effects of authoritarian parenting were in relation to the intergenerational continuity of child abuse. Continuity of child abuse refers to situations where abused parents have a child who experiences abuse without distinguishing whether the perpetrator is the parent or not, whereas transmission refers to a subset of those families in which parents who were victims of childhood abuse are identified as the perpetrators of abuse toward their own children (Berlin et al., 2011). Thus, in the current study the abuse assessed did not specifically implicate parents as perpetrator. Future research should seek to disentangle how authoritarian parenting may be protective from abuse perpetrated by others, as opposed to perpetrated by a parent. As an example, though speculative, it is possible that more authoritative parents may be more likely to set firmer limits and to closely monitor who their children are around, limiting the potential for child exposure to abusive adults.

Future Research Directions

There are many important issues at the intersection of racism and child maltreatment to be addressed in future research. First, as the recent editorials emphasized, as a field, we need to address race as a social construct and to explicitly discuss racism in studies involving different racialized and minoritized groups (Briggs-King et al., 2023; Palusci et al., 2023). We also need to systematically study and consider racism as a pervasive stressor that uniquely impacts Black individuals and families, and seeps into all aspects of development and adaptive functioning. This notion is supported by recent studies noting that “there has been limited attention to the impact of racism in developmental science and how racism in all of its forms directly and indirectly impacts children’s development…” (Iruka et al., 2022, p. 110).

Further, we need to advance conceptual models of child maltreatment to incorporate racism and culture—both in etiological models and in our attempts to understand the sequelae of child maltreatment and child welfare involvement on parent and child outcomes (Stephens, 2022). Given the racial disproportionality of those affected by child maltreatment (Detlaff et al., 2011), our conceptual models are incomplete without giving attention to the factors that contribute to and maintain these disparities. Moreover, we are just beginning to understand the racism experienced by Black and Latinx mothers through their involvement in the child welfare system and the impact of this racism in the surveillance, reporting and assessment, and resulting determinations regarding Black and Latinx people in the child welfare system (Merritt, 2021). Broadly, our collective research on the impact of child maltreatment, or even foster care, has not attempted to disentangle the effects of child maltreatment itself from the trauma associated with racism encountered in the child welfare system.

Additionally, future research should consider additional neighborhood characteristics and intra-individual changes in neighborhood characteristics such as concentrations of white residents in relation to how exposure to racism may be perceived. Residential segregation is another social stratification reflecting classism and racism (Williams & Collins, 2001). Although African American and White families may be living in the same neighborhoods with the same levels of exposure to community violence, culturally informed research demonstrates that the concentrations of racial minority groups within neighborhoods also influence adolescent development. Indeed, Black youth and families living in neighborhoods with high White concentrations experience hypervisibility, and in turn, may feel unwanted and experience higher levels of racism (Assari et al., 2018; Stevenson et al., 2005; Stewart et al., 2009).

Finally, efforts to move beyond cross group comparisons to instead consider within-group variability in cultural constructs at ontogenic and microsystem levels such as acculturation, ethnic identity, and racial identity (e.g., Cuéllar et al., 1995; Volpe et al., 2022) are critical. Such efforts are essential for moving beyond erroneous deficit-based models that inappropriately attribute disparities to race and ethnicity rather than to structural inequities, and for extending and testing theories about human development and parenting that have been assumed to be universal but were developed with majority white samples (Volpe et al., 2022). Moreover, within-group designs may aid the identification of culturally-relevant risk and protective factors that influence risk for and outcomes associated with child maltreatment. This work will be particularly important for identifying developmentally appropriate mechanistic prevention and intervention targets, as well as for creating culturally appropriate treatment adaptations for Black families.

In conclusion, this commentary extends efforts to promote anti-racist science, diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) recommended by APSAC and Child Maltreatment, by commenting on Valentino et al., 2012. In particular, we addressed prior omissions in the interpretation of the results, to explicitly discuss how racism influences parenting and the intergenerational continuity of child abuse among Black families in the context of racism. In doing so, we hope to encourage additional efforts to delineate how racism affects risk for child maltreatment directly and indirectly through processes operating at all ecological levels.

Funding

The author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (K08AA029150; K23MD016168; R01HD091235).

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

1.

We use the term Black individuals/families throughout this manuscript to be inclusive of African American and all other Black individuals/families.

References

  1. Anderson RE, Heard-Garris N, & DeLapp RCT (2022). Future directions for vaccinating children against the American endemic: Treating racism as a virus. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 51(1), 127–142. 10.1080/15374416.2021.1969940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Assari S, Gibbons FX, & Simons R (2018). Depression among black youth; Interaction of class and place. Brain Sciences, 8(6), 108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Assari S, & Mincy R (2021). Racism may interrupt age-related brain growth of african American children in the United States. Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health Care, 6(3), 1047. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates LA, & Glick JE (2013). Does it matter if teachers and schools match the student? Racial and ethnic disparities in problem behaviors. Social Science Research, 42(5), 1180–1190. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bécares L, Nazroo J, & Kelly Y (2015). A longitudinal examination of maternal, family, and area-level experiences of racism on children’s socioemotional development: Patterns and possible explanations. Social Science and Medicine, 142, 128–135. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berlin LJ, Appleyard K, & Dodge KA (2011). Intergenerational continuity in child maltreatment: Mediating mechanisms and implications for prevention. Child Development, 82(1), 162–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernard DL, Calhoun CD, Banks DE, Halliday CA, Hughes-Halbert C, & Danielson CK (2020). Making the “CACE” for a culturally-informed adverse childhood experiences framework to understand the pervasive mental health impact of racism on black youth. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 14(2), 233–247. 10.1007/s40653-020-00319-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bolger N, DeLongis A, Kessler RC, & Wethington E (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(1), 175–183. 10.2307/352378 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Briggs-King E, Hanson R, Klika JB, LeBlanc S, Maddux J, Merritt D, Palusci V, Panlilio CC, Roygardner D, Schelbe S, Stormer B, Valentino K, & Vaughan-Eden V (2023). Addressing systemic racism in APSAC Publications. Child Maltreatment, 28, xxx–xxx. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brody GH, Chen YF, Kogan SM, Murry VM, Logan P, & Luo Z (2008). Linking perceived discrimination to longitudinal changes in African American mothers’ parenting practices. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(2), 319–331. [Google Scholar]
  11. Buchanan NT, & Wiklund L (2020). Why clinical science must change or die: Integrating intersectionality and social justice. Women and Therapy, 43(3–4), 309–329. 10.1080/02703149.2020.1729470 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Burrell M, White AM, Frerichs L, Funchess M, Cerulli C, DiGiovanni L, & Hassmiller Lich K, (2021). Depicting “the system”: How structural racism and disenfranchisement in the United States can cause dynamics in community violence among males in urban black communities. Social Science and Medicine, 272 (21), 113469. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cauce AM, Hiraga Y, Graves D, Gonzales N, Ryan-Finn K, & Grove K (1996). African-American mothers and their adolescent daughters: Closeness, conflict, and control. In Ross Leadbeater BJ & Way N (Eds.), Urban girls:Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 100–116). New York: University Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cecil CAM, Viding E, Barker ED, Guiney J, & McCrory EJ (2014). Double disadvantage: The influence of childhood maltreatment and community violence exposure on adolescent mental health. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(7), 839–848. 10.1111/jcpp.12213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chae DH, Clouston S, Hatzenbuehler ML, Kramer MR, Cooper HLF, Wilson SM, Stephens-Davidowitz SI, Gold RS, & Link BG (2015). Association between an internet-based measure of area racism and black mortality. PloS One, 10(4), Article e0122963. 10.1371/journal.pone.0122963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cicchetti D, & Lynch M (1995). Failures in the expectable environment and their impact on individual development: The case of child maltreatment. In Cicchetti D & Cohen D (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology, Vol 2. Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 32–71). Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cicchetti D, & Valentino K (2006). An ecological transactional perspective on child maltreatment: Failure of the average expectable environment and its influence upon child development. In Cicchetti D & Cohen DJ (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology. (2nd ed. pp. 129–201). Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cole PM, & Tan PZ (2007).Emotion socialization from a cultural perspective. In Grusec JE & Hastings PD (Eds.), Handbookof socialization: Theory and research. (pp. 516–542). Guilford. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cross CJ, Fomby P, & Letiecq B (2022). Interlinking structural racism and heteropatriarchy: Rethinking family structure’s effects on child outcomes in a racialized, unequal society. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 14(3), 482–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cuéllar I, Arnold B, & González G (1995). Cognitive referents of acculturation: Assessment of cultural constructs in Mexican Americans. J Community Psychol, 23(4), 339–356. 10.1002/1520-6629 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dettlaff AJ, Rivaux SL, Baumann DJ, Fluke JD, Rycraft JR, & James J (2011). Disentangling substantiation: The influence of race, income, and risk on the substantiation decision in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(9), 1630–1637. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. English D, Lambert SF, Tynes BM, Bowleg L, Zea MC, & Howard LC (2020). Daily multidimensional racial discrimination among Black U.S. American adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 66(66), 101068. 10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fontes LA (2005). Child abuse and culture: Working with diverse families (pp. xv, 239). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Furstenberg F, Brooks-Gunn J, & Chase-Lansdale L (1989). Teenaged pregnancy and childbearing. The American Psychologist, 44(2), 313–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Galán CA, Meza JI, Ridenour TA, & Shaw DS (2022). Racial discrimination experienced by black parents: Enduring mental health consequences for adolescent youth. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 61(10), 1251–1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. García Coll C, Lamberty G, Jenkins R, McAdoo HP, Crnic K, Wasik BH, & Vázquez García H (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67(5), 1891–1914. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gee GC, Walsemann KM, & Brondolo E (2012). A life course perspective on how racism may Be related to health inequities. American Journal of Public Health, 102(5), 967–974. 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Harrell SP (2000). A multidimensional conceptualization of racism-related stress: Implications for the well-being of people of color. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70(1), 42–57. 10.1037/h0087722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hill NE (1995). The relationship between family environment and parenting style: A preliminary study of African American families. Journal of Black Psychology, 21(4), 408–423. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hill RB (2008). An analysis of racial/ethnic disproportionality and disparity at the national,state, and county levels. Casey Family Programs. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hughes D, Rodriguez J, Smith EP, Johnson DJ, Stevenson HC, & Spicer P (2006). Parents’ ethnic-racial socialization practices: A review of research and directions for future study. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Iruka IU, Gardner-Neblett N, Telfer NA, Ibekwe-Okafor N, Curenton SM, Sims J, & Neblett EW (2022). Effects of racism on child development: Advancing antiracist developmental science. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 4, 109–132. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones JM (1972). Prejudice and racism. Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jones SCT, Anderson RE, Gaskin-Wasson AL, Sawyer BA, Applewhite K, & Metzger IW (2020). From “crib to coffin”: Navigating coping from racism-related stress throughout the lifespan of Black Americans. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 90(2), 267–282. 10.1037/ort0000430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. LeCuyer EA, & Swanson DP (2017). A within-group analysis of african American mothers’ authoritarian attitudes, limit-setting and children’s self-regulation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(3), 833–842. 10.1007/s10826-0160609-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Maguire-Jack K, Lanier P, & Lombardi B (2020). Investigating racial differences in clusters of adverse childhood experiences. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 90(1), 106–114. 10.1037/ort0000405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Margerison-Zilko C, Perez-Patron M, & Cubbin C (2017). Residential segregation, political representation, and preterm birth among U.S.- and foreign-born Black women in the U.S. 2008–2010. Health and Place, 46, 13–20. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mehra R, Boyd LM, & Ickovics JR (2017). Racial residential segregation and adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 191, 237–250. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Merritt DH (2021). Lived experiences of racism among child welfare-involved parents. Race and Social Problems, 13, 63–72. 10.1007/s12552-021-09316-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Miller KM, Cahn K, Anderson-Nathe B, Cause AG, & Bender R (2013). Individual and systemic/structural bias in child welfare decision making: Implications for children and families of color. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(9), 1634–1642. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.07.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Murry VM, Gonzalez CM, Hanebutt RA, Bulgin D, Coates EE, Inniss-Thompson M, Debreaux ML, Wilson WE, Abel D, & Cortez MB (2022). Longitudinal study of the cascading effects of racial discrimination on parenting and adjustment among African American youth. Attachment and Human Development, 24(3), 322–338. 10.1080/14616734.2021.1976926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Palusci VJ, Barboza-Salerno G, Hanson RF, Maguire-Jack K, Valentino K, & Donlin J (2023). Editorial: Our commitment to promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice in child maltreatment. Child Maltreatment, 28, xxx–xxx. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Peek ME, Odoms-Young A, Quinn MT, Gorawara-Bhat R, Wilson SC, & Chin MH (2010). Race and shared decision-making: Perspectives of African-Americans with diabetes. Social Science and Medicine, 71(1), 1–9. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Phelan JC, & Link BG (2015). Is racism a fundamental cause of inequalities in health? Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 311–330. 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112305 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Priest N, Paradies Y, Trenerry B, Truong M, Karlsen S, & Kelly Y (2013). A systematic review of studies examining the relationship between reported racism and health and wellbeing for children and young people. Social Science and Medicine, 95, 115–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Quintana SM, Aboud FE, Chao RK, Contreras-Grau J, Cross WE, Hudley C, & Vietze DL (2006). Race, ethnicity, and culture in child development: Contemporary research and future directions. Child Development, 77(5), 1129–1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Riina EM, & McHale SM (2012). Adolescents’ experiences of discrimination and parent– adolescent relationship quality: The moderating roles of sociocultural processes. Journal of Family Issues, 33(7), 851–873. 10.1177/0192513X11423897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rosenthal L, Earnshaw VA, Moore JM, Ferguson DN, Lewis TT, Reid AE, Lewis JB, Stasko EC, Tobin JN, & Ickovics JR (2018). Intergenerational consequences: Women’s experiences of discrimination in pregnancy predict infant social-emotional development at six months and one year. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics : JDBP, 39(3), 228–237. 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shonkoff JP, Slopen N, & Williams DR (2021). Early childhood adversity, toxic stress, and the impacts of racism on the foundations of health. Annual Review of Public Health, 42, 115–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Siegel M, Critchfield-Jain I, Boykin M, Owens A, Nunn T, & Muratore R (2022). Actual racial/ethnic disparities in COVID19 mortality for the non-Hispanic black compared to non-Hispanic white population in 353 US counties and their association with structural racism. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 9(5), 1697–1725. 10.1007/s40615-021-01109-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Stephens T (2022). Black parents love their children too: Addressing anti-Black racism in the American child welfare system. Social Work, 67(2), 191–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Stevenson HC, McNeil JD, Herrero-Taylor T, & Davis GY (2005). Influence of perceived neighborhood diversity and racism experience on the racial socialization of Black youth. Journal of Black Psychology, 31(3), 273–290. [Google Scholar]
  53. Stewart EA, Baumer EP, Brunson RK, & Simons RL (2009). Neighborhood racial context and perceptions of police-based racial discrimination among black youth. Criminology, 47(3), 847–887. [Google Scholar]
  54. Thomas AJ, & Blackmon SKM (2015). The influence of the Trayvon Martin shooting on racial socialization practices of African American parents. Journal of Black Psychology, 41(1), 75–89. [Google Scholar]
  55. Valentino K, & Edler K (2022). Ecological transactional perspectives on child maltreatment. In St Laurent D, Dubout Comtois C, & Cyr C (Eds.), Maltreatment: Developmental and ecological perspectives. Press of the University of Quebec. [Google Scholar]
  56. Valentino K, Nuttall AK, Comas M, Borkowski JG, & Akai C (2012). Intergenerational continuity of child abuse among adolescent mothers: Authoritarian parenting, community violence, and race. Child Maltreatment, 17(2), 172–181. 10.1177/1077559511434945 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Valrie C, Thurston I, & Santos M (2020). Introduction to the special issue: Addressing health disparities in pediatric psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 45(8), 833–838. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Vélez-Agosto NM, Soto-Crespo JG, Vizcarrondo-Oppenheimer M, Vega-Molina S, & García Coll C (2017). Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory Revision: Moving culture from the macro into the micro. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 900–910. 10.1177/1745691617704397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Volpe VV, Smith NA, Skinner OD, Lozada FT, Hope EC, & Del Toro J (2022). Centering the Heterogeneity of black adolescents’ experiences: Guidance for within-group designs among African diasporic communities. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 32(4), 1298–1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Williams D, & Collins C (2001). Racial residential segregation: A fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Reports, 116(5), 404–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Williams DR (2018). Stress and the mental health of populations of color: Advancing our understanding of race-related stressors. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 59(4), 466–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Williams DR, & Williams-Morris R (2000) Racism and mental health: The African American experience, Ethnicity and Health, 5(3–4), 243–268. 10.1080/713667453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wren Serbin J, & Donnelly E (2016). The impact of racism and midwifery’s lack of racial diversity: A literature review. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 61(6), 694–706. 10.1111/jmwh.12572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang X, & Monnat SM (2021). Racial/ethnic differences in clusters of adverse childhood experiences and associations with adolescent mental health. SSM - Population Health, 17, 100997. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES