Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1988 Jan;86(1):200–203. doi: 10.1104/pp.86.1.200

Do Stomata Respond to CO2 Concentrations Other than Intercellular? 1

Keith A Mott 1
PMCID: PMC1054454  PMID: 16665866

Abstract

Most studies on stomatal responses to CO2 assume that guard cells respond only to intercellular CO2 concentration and are insensitive to the CO2 concentrations in the pore and outside the leaf. If stomata are sensitive to the CO2 concentration at the surface of the leaf or in the stomatal pore, the stomatal response to intercellular CO2 concentration will be incorrect for a `normally' operating leaf (where ambient CO2 concentration is a constant). In this study asymmetric CO2 concentrations for the two surfaces of amphistomatous leaves were used to vary intercellular and leaf surface CO2 concentrations independently in Xanthium strumarium L. and Helianthus annuus L. The response of stomata to intercellular CO2 concentration when the concentration at the leaf surface was held constant was found to be the same as the response when the surface concentration was varied. In addition, stomata did not respond to changes in leaf surface CO2 concentration when the intercellular concentration for that surface was held constant. It is concluded that stomata respond to intercellular CO2 concentration and are insensitive to the CO2 concentration at the surface of the leaf and in the stomatal pore.

Full text

PDF
200

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Farquhar G. D., Dubbe D. R., Raschke K. Gain of the feedback loop involving carbon dioxide and stomata: theory and measurement. Plant Physiol. 1978 Sep;62(3):406–412. doi: 10.1104/pp.62.3.406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mott K. A., O'leary J. W. Stomatal Behavior and CO(2) Exchange Characteristics in Amphistomatous Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1984 Jan;74(1):47–51. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sharkey T. D., Raschke K. Separation and measurement of direct and indirect effects of light on stomata. Plant Physiol. 1981 Jul;68(1):33–40. doi: 10.1104/pp.68.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wong S. C., Cowan I. R., Farquhar G. D. Leaf Conductance in Relation to Assimilation in Eucalyptus pauciflora Sieb. ex Spreng: Influence of Irradiance and Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide. Plant Physiol. 1978 Oct;62(4):670–674. doi: 10.1104/pp.62.4.670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES