Skip to main content
Reproductive Medicine and Biology logoLink to Reproductive Medicine and Biology
. 2023 Oct 2;22(1):e12542. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12542

Expression of RSPH6A in the first wave of rat spermatogenesis and oxidative stress conditions: Attenuation by melatonin

Maria Zelinda Romano 1, Mariem Ben Rhouma 2, Imed Messaoudi 2, Francesco Aniello 3, Sergio Minucci 1,, Massimo Venditti 1
PMCID: PMC10545975  PMID: 37795044

Abstract

Purpose

Here, we report, for the first time, the temporal expression and localization of axonemal radial spoke head homolog A (RSPH6A) protein during the first wave of rat spermatogenesis and in oxidative stress conditions.

Methods

For the developmental study, testes were collected from rats at different developmental stages (7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 60 postnatal days); for in vivo treatment, 24 rats were treated with cadmium and/or melatonin. From each sample, western blot (WB) and immunofluorescence (IF) analyses for RSPH6A were performed.

Results

RSPH6A expression starts at 21 PND alongside the appearance of I spermatocytes (SPC) with a significant increase up to 60 PND. Data were confirmed by IF analysis, showing that RPSH6A expression is restricted to I and II SPC, spermatids, and mature sperm. In vivo experiments showed that the expression and localization of RSPH6A in the testis and epididymal spermatozoa of adult rats treated with cadmium were impaired. Interestingly, melatonin (an antioxidant), given together with Cd, can counteract its damaging effects.

Conclusions

All combined data confirm that RSPH6A contributes to the onset of fertility by acting on sperm motility, raising the possibility of using RSPH6A as a marker for normal fertility in the general population.

Keywords: cadmium, melatonin, rat testis, RSPH6A, spermatozoa


Here is reported, for the first time, the temporal expression and localization of RSPH6A protein during the first wave of rat spermatogenesis. Its expression starts at 21 PND alongside the appearance of ISPC and increases up to 60 PND. The expression and localization of RSPH6A in the testis and epididymal spermatozoa of adult rats treated with cadmium were impaired. Melatonin, given together with Cd, can counteract its damaging effects.

graphic file with name RMB2-22-e12542-g005.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Radial spoke proteins connect the central pair of microtubules and the outer microtubules in each axoneme and are essential for its distinctive curvature pattern and motility. 1 RSPH6A (radial spoke head 6 homolog A), a component of the flagellar axoneme, 2 , 3 is a testis‐specific protein and, due to its specific localization in the tail of the mature spermatozoa (SPZ), is involved in flagellar motility. 4

RSPH6A mRNA is exclusively expressed in testicular germ cells (GC) during meiosis, and the protein is associated with flagellar cytoskeletal structures in mature mouse sperm 2 and in human testes and sperm flagella. 5 , 6

In addition, in our previous study, we found that RSPH6A protein expression and localization were compromised in the SPZ of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) patients, causing impaired motility and fertility, 6 producing the fertility defects observed in DM1 patients. 6 , 7 Furthermore, our recent study showed that in human SPZ samples, cadmium (Cd) treatment, via producing oxidative stress, reduced RSPH6A protein levels and consequently affect SPZ motility; this effect was counteracted by melatonin (Mlt). 8

A recent report showed that asthenospermia was present in 50.5% of infertile males examined 9 since an SPZ efficient motility is necessary for their passage through the female reproductive tract. 10 , 11 , 12 Decreased sperm motility significantly reduces SPZ ability both to reach the fertilization site and to penetrate the oocyte, thereby reducing male fertility; therefore, their motility is essential for the success of fertilization. 13 , 14

It is known that lifestyle and exposure to environmental pollutants, in addition to genetic and hormonal causes, are the most frequent etiologies of infertility. 15 Among the environmental substances directly involved in growing infertility, Cd is a heavy metal with a very long half‐life 16 that acts as an endocrine disruptor 17 , 18 and induces oxidative stress. 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 Cd deleterious effects on health and on the fertility rate are widely studied, 23 since Cd impairs spermatogenesis, 18 , 21 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 finally leading to a reduction in sperm quantity and quality, specifically by reducing SPZ motility. 28 , 29

Because Cd exposure is an inevitable phenomenon, numerous studies have concentrated on research to identify the precise molecular targets of Cd effects and, therefore, find potential ameliorative or suppressive molecules that could be utilized in new therapeutic advances. Of such protective molecules, melatonin (Mlt) is one of the most studied since it is known to have antiapoptotic and antioxidant effects. 30 Our previous study indicated the ability of Mlt to counteract/protect the morphology and physiology of the rat testis from the detrimental effects of Cd. 18 , 21

Considering that the motility of SPZ is a crucial factor for the success of fertilization and keeping in mind that RSPH6A is just involved in their motility, herein, for the first time, we evaluated the expression of RSPH6A protein during postnatal development, other than the effect of in vivo Cd‐Mlt treatments on its protein level in rat testis and SPZ.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Animals, treatments, and sample collection

2.1.1. Development study

Male Wistar rats were kept under specific conditions (12:12 h light/dark) and received standard food and water ad libitum. Animals at different development stages (7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 and 60 postnatal days, PND) (n = 3 per stage) were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg i.p.) and then sacrificed.

Testes were removed, and for each rat, right testis was fixed in Bouin's solution for histological studies, while the left was stored at –80°C for biomolecular studies.

2.1.2. In vivo treatment

Twenty‐four Wistar male rats, aged 2 months and weighing 225 ± 36 g, were kept in individual stainless‐steel cages under controlled conditions of light (12:12 h light/dark), temperature (22 ± 2°C) and humidity (55 ± 20%). Food and water were given ad libitum. Rats were divided into four groups (n = each); 1) control (Ctrl); 2) Cd‐treated (50 mg CdCl2/L in drinking water; Sigma‐Aldrich); 3) Mlt‐treated (3 mg/L in drinking water; Sigma‐Aldrich); 4) Cd + Mlt‐treated (50 mg CdCl2/L + 3 mg Mlt/L in drinking water). The concentration of Cd and Mlt was chosen according to the literature. 31 , 32 After 40 days, rats were sacrificed, and testes were sampled as above‐described. Epididymides were dissected and minced in PBS (pH 7.4) to allow SPZ to flow from the ducts. Then, the fluid samples were filtered and examined under a light microscope to exclude contamination by other cell types. Next, aliquots were spotted and air‐dried on slides and stored at −20°C; the remaining samples were centrifuged at 1000× g for 15 min at 4°C and stored at −80°C for molecular analysis.

The procedure was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research in Life Science and Health of the Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Monastir (CER‐SVS/ISBM – protocol 022/2020) and was carried out according to the UNESCO Recommendation Concerning Science and Scientific Research (1974, 2017).

2.2. Histology

The fixed testes were dehydrated in increasing ethanol concentrations before paraffin embedding. Five micrometres thick paraffin sections were stained with Hematoxylin/Eosin for histological evaluation.

2.3. Western blot (WB) analysis

Proteins were extracted from the testis and SPZ in RIPA lysis buffer [(#TCL131; HiMedia Laboratories GmbH) supplemented with protease inhibitors mix (#39102.01; SERVA Electrophoresis)]. The homogenized samples were sonicated 3 times (20 Hz for 20 s each), placed on ice for 30 min, centrifuged at 10000× g for 30 min at 4°C and the supernatants collected. 33

Forty micrograms of the protein extracts were separated by 9% SDS‐PAGE and then transferred to Hybond‐P PVDF membranes (#GE10600023; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at 280 mA for 2.5 h at 4°C. Filters were blocked with 5% powdered milk in TBST (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, containing 0.25% Tween – 20) for 3 h at RT. Then, they were incubated with primary antibodies anti‐RSPH6A (80 kDa, 1:1000; #HPA045382, Sigma–Aldrich) and anti‐α‐Tubulin (52 kDa, 1:5000; #E‐AB‐20036, Elabscience Biotechnology).

After incubation at 4°C overnight, the filters were washed three times in TBST and incubated with peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibody anti‐mouse IgG (1:5000; #AP130P; Sigma‐Aldrich) for the mouse anti‐α‐Tubulin or anti‐rabbit IgG (1:3000; #AP307P; Sigma‐Aldrich) secondary antibody for the anti‐RSPH6A, for 1 h at RT.

Filters were washed again in TBST three times. The immunocomplexes were detected using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) – WB detection system. ImageJ software (version 1.53 g; NIH) was used to analyze all bands. Each WB was performed in triplicate.

2.4. Immunofluorescence (IF) analysis

For IF staining, testis sections, and sperms were permeabilized with PBS pH 7.4 containing 0.1% Triton‐X‐100 for 30 min. Antigen retrieval was performed by putting slides in a pressure cooker for 3 min in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Non‐specific binding sites were blocked with PBS containing 5% BSA and normal goat serum diluted 1:5. 34 Sections were incubated with primary antibodies anti‐RSPH6A (1:100); anti‐SYCP3 (1:100; #sc‐74 569; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti‐α‐Tubulin (1:100) at 4°C. After three washes in PBS, slides were incubated for 1 h with PNA lectin (#L32458; Thermo Fisher Scientific) diluted at 1:50, and the appropriate secondary antibody [goat anti‐rabbit Alexa Fluor 488, (#A32731 Thermo Fisher Scientific); goat anti‐mouse CF™ 568 (#SAB4600082; Sigma–Aldrich)] both diluted to 1:500 in the blocking mixture for 1 h at RT. Nuclei were stained with Vectashield + DAPI and slides were observed and captured with the optical microscope (Leica DM 5000 B + CTR 5000) with a UV lamp and saved with IM 1000 software. Each IF was performed in triplicate.

2.5. Statistical analysis

Data are reported as mean ± SEM. Differences between the groups were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Analyses were performed using one‐way ANOVA; Tukey's post hoc t‐test was applied when appropriate with Prism 5.0, GraphPad.

3. RESULTS

3.1. RSPH6A protein expression and localization during development and in adult testis

To assess the expression level of RSPH6A protein in the rat testis during postnatal development, we performed a WB analysis (Figure 1A). Its expression occurs from 21 PND at the onset of meiotic spermatocytes (SPC; Figure 1A) and significantly increases at 28 and 35 PND (p < 0.01), up to 42 and 60 PND (p < 0.01; Figure 1B). To clarify the protein localization, we performed an IF analysis for RSPH6A, together with tubulin, SYCP3 (a meiotic marker), and PNA lectin, which highlights the acrosome (Figure 1C). The results confirmed the WB findings; in fact, the appearance of the protein signal was observed starting at 21 PND in meiotic SPC, which were distinguished by the SYCP3 nuclear staining (arrowhead – Figure 1C) and, in the subsequent cell stages, marked by PNA lectin staining, the signal was also observed in round spermatids (RSpt; thick arrow – Figure 1C), elongated spermatids (ESpt; triangle – Figure 1C) and, lastly, in luminal SPZ (asterisk – Figure 1C). Analysis of the fluorescence intensity showed a comparable pattern, statistically significant, as observed for the protein level (Figure 1D).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(A) WB and (B) relative histogram of RSPH6A in testis during developmental stages. Data were normalized with α‐Tubulin and reported as OD ratio. a vs. b p < 0.01; b vs. c p < 0.05. (C) IF analysis of RSPH6A (green) and α‐Tubulin (red) in testis during developmental stages. Cell nuclei were marked with DAPI (blue). The upper insets represent SYCP3 (red) and the lower insets represent PNA lectin (red). Arrowhead: SPC; thick arrow: RSpt; triangle: ESpt; asterisk: SPZ. Scale bars represent 20 μm and 10 μm in the insets. (D) Histogram showing the quantification of RSPH6A fluorescence signal intensity. a vs. b p < 0.001; b vs. c p < 0.01. All values are expressed as means ± SEM.

3.2. Testicular morphology of Cd and Mlt‐treated testis

To evaluate the histological characteristics of the testis of Cd‐ and Mlt‐treated rats, Hematoxylin–eosin staining was performed (Figure 2). Control and Mlt‐treated rats presented an intact seminiferous epithelium and GC in all the different stages of differentiation and with lumens filled with mature SPZ (triangle). The Cd‐treated group showed non‐homogeneous seminiferous tubules, characterized by desquamation (thin arrow) and space between GC (asterisk). In the Cd + Mlt treated group, due to the counteractive action of Mlt, improvement in tubules and epithelium morphology was observed.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Hematoxylin/Eosin stain of Cd and Mlt‐treated testis. Morphological evaluation of testes treated with Cd and/or Mlt. Thin arrow: GC desquamation; Triangle: lumen; Asterisk: space between GC Scale bars represent 20 μm.

3.3. RSPH6A expression and localization in Cd and Mlt‐treated testis

RPSH6A protein level was determined from the testis of rats treated with Cd and/or Mlt (Figure 3). WB analysis (Figure 3A,B) showed a significant decrease in RSPH6A levels in the Cd‐treated group when compared with Ctrl and Mlt groups (p < 0.001). In the Cd + Mlt group, RSPH6A level significantly increased compared with the Cd group (p < 0.05). No differences between Ctrl and Mlt‐treated groups were found. To confirm this data, we performed an IF analysis on testis from the four groups, together with the same markers described in section 3.1 (Figure 3C). The results were a consolidation of WB analysis; the Cd‐treated group showed a visible decrease in protein signal in the meiotic SPC, marked by SYCP3 (arrowhead), as well as in the post‐meiotic cells, highlighted by PNA lectin staining, RSpt (thick arrow), ESpt (triangle), and SPZ (asterisk) compared with the Ctrl and Mlt groups (p < 0.001), while the Cd + Mlt treated group showed a signal increase when compared to the Cd group (p < 0.01). There were no differences between Ctrl and Mlt‐treated groups (Figure 3D).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

(A) WB and (B) relative histogram of RSPH6A in the testis of animals treated with Cd and/or Mlt. Data were normalized with α‐Tubulin and reported as OD ratio. a vs. b p < 0.001; b vs. c p < 0.05. (C) IF analysis of RSPH6A (green) and α‐Tubulin (red) in the testis of animals treated with Cd and/or Mlt. Cell nuclei were marked with DAPI (blue). For each group, the upper insets represent SYCP3 (red) and the lower insets represent PNA lectin (red). Arrowhead: SPC; thick arrow: RSpt; triangle: ESpt; asterisk: SPZ. Scale bars represent 20 μm. (D) Histogram showing the quantification of RSPH6A fluorescence signal intensity. a vs. b p < 0.001; b vs. c p < 0.01. All values are expressed as means ± SEM.

3.4. RSPH6A expression and localization in Cd and Mlt‐treated SPZ

WB analysis on SPZ (Figure 4A,B) showed a significant decrease in RSPH6A expression in the Cd‐treated group when compared with Ctrl and Mlt groups (p < 0.001). Interestingly, when Mlt was administered along with Cd, there was a partial restoration of RSPH6A protein level, compared to Cd (p < 0.05), Ctrl and Mlt groups (p < 0.001; Figure 4A,B). To determine the localization of RSPH6A in the rat SPZ, we performed an IF on the SPZ of the four groups (Figure 4C). The results showed that the localization of RSPH6A is confined to the flagellum midpiece, as seen from the merge between α‐Tubulin and RSPH6A signals, in all the groups (Figure 4C). Finally, analysis of the fluorescence intensity showed a comparable pattern, statistically significant, as observed for the protein level (Figure 4D).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

(A) WB and (B) relative histogram of RSPH6A in SPZ of animals treated with Cd and/or Mlt. Data were normalized with α‐Tubulin and reported as OD ratio. a vs. b p < 0.001; b vs. c p < 0.05. (C) IF analysis of RSPH6A (green) and α‐Tubulin (red) in SPZ of animals treated with Cd and/or Mlt. Cell nuclei were marked with DAPI (blue). Scale bars represent 20 μm. (D) Histogram showing the quantification of RSPH6A fluorescence signal intensity. a vs. b p < 0.01; b vs. c p < 0.01. All values are expressed as means ± SEM.

4. DISCUSSION

Successful reproduction, necessary to ensure the continuation of the species, requires the production of good‐quality gametes. 35 In contrast, infertility is a principal concern today, affecting nearly 200 million people worldwide, of whom male infertility contributes 50 percent. 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 One of the most common diseases causing male infertility is asthenozoospermia, characterized by impaired motility of SPZ (<40%), 40 which does not allow them to reach the oocyte, causing sub‐infertility. 39 SPZ flagella formation occurs during spermiogenesis, an extremely dynamic process in which SPT intimately change their morphology. The whole spermatogenic process is regulated in a coordinated manner by several genes that are expressed in a spatial‐ and temporal‐specific pattern; however, the lack of an efficient in vitro system that mimics mammalian spermatogenesis encourages the use of other models, such as using knock‐out animals or studying the events occurring during the first wave of spermatogenesis. 41 This last model is a helpful tool to characterize proteins involved in spermatogenesis and spermiogenesis due to the gradual appearance and differentiation of the cells composing the seminiferous epithelium. Thus, it becomes particularly crucial to study the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying spermatogenesis to develop intervention strategies to enhance gametic quality and, therefore, to improve fertility.

In this context, our previous works confirmed the role of RSPH6A in human sperm motility, as its protein level and localization were impaired in abnormal conditions, such as DM1 6 and induced oxidative stress. 8 In this report, we analyzed, for the first time in rat testis, the temporal and spatial expression of RSPH6A during the first wave of spermatogenesis. WB analysis highlighted that the protein appeared at 21 PND, the developmental stage during which are produced I SPC, as well as a progressive increase in RSPH6A protein level until 60 PND. These results were confirmed by IF data, highlighting that the increased protein level, evidenced by WB, may be attributed to the gradual appearance of meiotic (SPC) and post‐meiotic (RSpt and ESpt) cells and, finally, mature luminal SPZ. We hypothesized that, although RSPH6A is necessary for the proper SPZ motility, its production during the stages preceding spermiogenesis, starting at 28 PND, may be needed to allow flagella formation. However, further studies are required to clarify this point. Nevertheless, our combined data confirmed the findings of previous works indicating the specific localization of RSPH6A in vertebrate GC. 2 , 4

Previously, we confirmed the involvement of RSPH6A in the regulation of sperm motility showing that in vitro Cd‐treatment of human SPZ, causing impairment of RSPH6A expression and localization, decreases their motility; simultaneous treatment with Mlt counteracted Cd effects. 8 Therefore, we verified whether in vivo treatment with Cd affected rat RSPH6A protein in the rat testis. It is well known that the testis is particularly susceptible to the consequences of induced‐oxidative stress 42 ; therefore, the choice of Cd was not accidental since its ability to generate oxidative stress and its effects on spermatogenesis have been widely demonstrated. 28 , 43 Thus, Cd treatment may be a useful model to study the effects of oxidative stress on spermatogenesis by unraveling the underlying molecular pathway(s).

In this report, we confirmed the detrimental effects caused by the oxidative stress Cd‐induced on testicular morphology, as well as the ability of Mlt to counteract these effects due to its well‐known antioxidant property.

As expected, results showed that 40 days of Cd treatment provoked a significant reduction in RSPH6A level in both the testis and SPZ. This data further confirms the detrimental action of Cd, which alters testicular activity at various levels, including steroidogenesis, 27 , 43 blood‐testis barrier integrity, 19 , 21 cytoarchitecture of the cells composing the seminiferous epithelium, 18 , 25 , 26 and sperm parameters, especially motility. 8 , 21 Interestingly, the antioxidant ability of Mlt to counteract the Cd‐induced effect was evidenced again, as only a slight decrease in RSPH6A expression was observed in the group treated simultaneously with Mlt and Cd. Thus, the reduced SPZ motility induced by Cd may also be the consequence of RSPH6A expression impairment; this finding further supports its involvement in SPZ motility, also highlighted by the fact that Mlt, while preventing the decrease in RSPH6A levels, ensures proper SPZ motility.

In conclusion, this is the first report evidencing the expression and localization of RSPH6A in the rat testis and in mature SPZ. In particular, the protein localized in meiotic and post‐meiotic GC, starting at 21 PDN and accumulating during the following proliferative and differentiative stages occurring during the first wave of rat spermatogenesis. In addition, the involvement of RSPH6A in SPZ motility was partially blocked by Cd treatment and restored by the simultaneous use of the antioxidant Mlt. Finally, this report suggests that RSPH6A may be a potential new marker of male fertility but also confirms that Mlt is a helpful tool for improving or preserving SPZ quality.

FUNDING INFORMATION

PRIN 2020 (prot. 20204YRYS5) and Erasmus KA‐1072020 (Naples‐Monastir).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. Antonia Pennino for her technical support under Erasmus KA107.

Romano MZ, Ben Rhouma M, Messaoudi I, Aniello F, Minucci S, Venditti M. Expression of RSPH6A in the first wave of rat spermatogenesis and oxidative stress conditions: Attenuation by melatonin. Reprod Med Biol. 2023;22:e12542. 10.1002/rmb2.12542

REFERENCES

  • 1. Zhu X, Liu Y, Yang P. Radial spokes‐a snapshot of the motility regulation, assembly, and evolution of cilia and flagella. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9:a028126. 10.1101/cshperspect.a028126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Paudel B, Gervasi MG, Porambo J, Caraballo DA, Tourzani DA, Mager J, et al. Sperm capacitation is associated with phosphorylation of the testis‐specific radial spoke protein Rsph6a. Biol Reprod. 2019;100:440–454. 10.1093/biolre/ioy202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Curry AM, Williams BD, Rosenbaum JL. Sequence analysis reveals homology between two proteins of the flagellar radial spoke. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:3967–3977. 10.1128/mcb.12.9.3967-3977.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Abbasi F, Miyata H, Shimada K, Morohoshi A, Nozawa K, Matsumura T, et al. RSPH6A is required for sperm flagellum formation and male fertility in mice. J Cell Sci. 2018;131:jcs221648. 10.1242/jcs.221648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kott E, Legendre M, Copin B, Papon J‐F, Dastot‐Le Moal F, Montantin G, et al. Loss‐of‐function mutations in RSPH1 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with central‐complex and radial‐spoke defects. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:561–570. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ergoli M, Venditti M, Picillo E, Minucci S, Politano L. Study of expression of genes potentially responsible for reduced fitness in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 and identification of new biomarkers of testicular function. Mol Reprod Dev. 2020;87:45–52. 10.1002/mrd.23307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Buckley L, Lacey M, Ehrlich M. Epigenetics of the myotonic dystrophy‐associated DMPK gene neighborhood. Epigenomics. 2016;8:13–31. 10.2217/epi.15.104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Minucci S, Venditti M. New insight on the In vitro effects of melatonin in preserving human sperm quality. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:5128. 10.3390/ijms23095128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wu Z‐G, Chen W‐K, Fei Q‐J, Liu Y‐L, Liu X‐D, Huang H, et al. Analysis of semen quality of 38 905 infertile male patients during 2008‐2016 in Wenzhou. China Asian J Androl. 2021;23:314–318. 10.4103/aja.aja_83_20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Suarez SS. How do sperm get to the egg? Bioengineering expertise needed! Exp Mech. 2010;50:1267–1274. 10.1007/s11340-009-9312-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Suarez SS. Control of hyperactivation in sperm. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:647–657. 10.1093/humupd/dmn029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Pereira R, Sá R, Barros A, Sousa M. Major regulatory mechanisms involved in sperm motility. Asian J Androl. 2017;19:5–14. 10.4103/1008-682X.167716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Guo Y, Jiang W, Yu W, Niu X, Liu F, Zhou T, et al. Proteomics analysis of asthenozoospermia and identification of glucose‐6‐phosphate isomerase as an important enzyme for sperm motility. J Proteomics. 2019;208:103478. 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Aitken RJ. Diagnosis of male infertility. In: Templeton AA, Drife JO, editors. Infertility [Internet]. London: Springer; 1992. p. 81–100. 10.1007/978-1-4471-1962-3_5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Karavolos S, Panagiotopoulou N, Alahwany H, Martins da Silva S. An update on the management of male infertility. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;22:267–274. 10.1111/tog.12688 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wang M, Chen Z, Song W, Hong D, Huang L, Li Y. A review on cadmium exposure in the population and intervention strategies against cadmium toxicity. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2021;106:65–74. 10.1007/s00128-020-03088-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bhardwaj JK, Panchal H, Saraf P. Cadmium as a testicular toxicant: a review. J Appl Toxicol. 2021;41:105–117. 10.1002/jat.4055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Venditti M, Ben Rhouma M, Romano MZ, Messaoudi I, Reiter RJ, Minucci S. Altered expression of DAAM1 and PREP induced by cadmium toxicity is counteracted by melatonin in the rat testis. Genes (Basel). 2021;12:1016. 10.3390/genes12071016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hassine MBH, Venditti M, Rhouma MB, Minucci S, Messaoudi I. Combined effect of polystyrene microplastics and cadmium on rat blood‐testis barrier integrity and sperm quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30:56700–56712. 10.1007/s11356-023-26429-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Nemmiche S. Oxidative signaling response to cadmium exposure. Toxicol Sci. 2017;156:4–10. 10.1093/toxsci/kfw222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Venditti M, Ben Rhouma M, Romano MZ, Messaoudi I, Reiter RJ, Minucci S. Evidence of melatonin ameliorative effects on the blood‐testis barrier and sperm quality alterations induced by cadmium in the rat testis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;226:112878. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Venditti M, Santillo A, Latino D, Ben Rhouma M, Romano MZ, Haddadi A, et al. Evidence of the protective role of D‐aspartate in counteracting/preventing cadmium‐induced oxidative stress in the rat testis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023;259:115067. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kumar S, Sharma A. Cadmium toxicity: effects on human reproduction and fertility. Rev Environ Health. 2019;34:327–338. 10.1515/reveh-2019-0016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Yari A, Sarveazad A, Asadi E, Raouf Sarshoori J, Babahajian A, Amini N, et al. Efficacy of Crocus sativus L. on reduction of cadmium‐induced toxicity on spermatogenesis in adult rats. Andrologia. 2016;48:1244–1252. 10.1111/and.12568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chemek M, Venditti M, Boughamoura S, Mimouna SB, Messaoudi I, Minucci S. Involvement of testicular DAAM1 expression in zinc protection against cadmium‐induced male rat reproductive toxicity. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:630–640. 10.1002/jcp.25923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Venditti M, Chemek M, Minucci S, Messaoudi I. Cadmium‐induced toxicity increases prolyl endopeptidase (PREP) expression in the rat testis. Mol Reprod Dev. 2020;87:565–573. 10.1002/mrd.23345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Venditti M, Ben Hadj Hassine M, Messaoudi I, Minucci S. The simultaneous administration of microplastics and cadmium alters rat testicular activity and changes the expression of PTMA, DAAM1 and PREP. Front cell. Dev Biol. 2023;11:1145702. 10.3389/fcell.2023.1145702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. de Angelis C, Galdiero M, Pivonello C, Salzano C, Gianfrilli D, Piscitelli P, et al. The environment and male reproduction: the effect of cadmium exposure on reproductive function and its implication in fertility. Reprod Toxicol. 2017;73:105–127. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.07.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zhu Q, Li X, Ge R‐S. Toxicological effects of cadmium on mammalian testis. Front Genet. 2020;11:527. 10.3389/fgene.2020.00527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kopustinskiene DM, Bernatoniene J. Molecular mechanisms of melatonin‐mediated cell protection and signaling in health and disease. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:129. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Knani L, Venditti M, Kechiche S, Banni M, Messaoudi I, Minucci S. Melatonin protects bone against cadmium‐induced toxicity via activation of Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2020;30:237–245. 10.1080/15376516.2019.1701595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Kechiche S, Venditti M, Knani L, Jabłońska K, Dzięgiel P, Messaoudi I, et al. First evidence of the protective role of melatonin in counteracting cadmium toxicity in the rat ovary via the mTOR pathway. Environ Pollut. 2021;270:116056. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Venditti M, Minucci S. Subcellular localization of prolyl endopeptidase during the first wave of rat spermatogenesis and in rat and human sperm. J Histochem Cytochem. 2019;67:229–243. 10.1369/0022155418810064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Venditti M, Aniello F, Santillo A, Minucci S. Study on PREP localization in mouse seminal vesicles and its possible involvement during regulated exocytosis. Zygote. 2019;27:160–165. 10.1017/S0967199419000194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Sang Q, Zhou Z, Mu J, Wang L. Genetic factors as potential molecular markers of human oocyte and embryo quality. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:993–1002. 10.1007/s10815-021-02196-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Bui AD, Sharma R, Henkel R, Agarwal A. Reactive oxygen species impact on sperm DNA and its role in male infertility. Andrologia. 2018;50:e13012. 10.1111/and.13012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Canipari R, De Santis L, Cecconi S. Female fertility and environmental pollution. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:8802. 10.3390/ijerph17238802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Tirpák F, Greifová H, Lukáč N, Stawarz R, Massányi P. Exogenous factors affecting the functional integrity of male reproduction. Life (Basel). 2021;11:213. 10.3390/life11030213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Krausz C. Male infertility: pathogenesis and clinical diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25:271–285. 10.1016/j.beem.2010.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. World Health Organization . WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Sixth edition. ISBN: 978 92 4 0030787.
  • 41. Yogo K. Molecular basis of the morphogenesis of sperm head and tail in mice. Reprod Med Biol. 2022;21:e12466. 10.1002/rmb2.12466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Sharma P, Kaushal N, Saleth LR, Ghavami S, Dhingra S, Kaur P. Oxidative stress‐induced apoptosis and autophagy: balancing the contrary forces in spermatogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2023;1869:166742. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2023.166742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ali W, Ma Y, Zhu J, Zou H, Liu Z. Mechanisms of cadmium‐induced testicular injury: a risk to male fertility. Cell. 2022;11:3601. 10.3390/cells11223601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Reproductive Medicine and Biology are provided here courtesy of John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.

RESOURCES