Skip to main content
PMC home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1988 Apr;86(4):1228–1235. doi: 10.1104/pp.86.4.1228

Role of Motility and Chemotaxis in Efficiency of Nodulation by Rhizobium meliloti1

Gustavo Caetano-Anollés 1,2,3,2, Luis G Wall 1,2,3, Ana T De Micheli 1,2,3, Edgardo M Macchi 1,2,3, Wolfgang D Bauer 1,2,3, Gabriel Favelukes 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1054656  PMID: 16666059

Abstract

Spontaneous mutants of Rhizobium meliloti L5-30 defective in motility or chemotaxis were isolated and compared against the parent with respect to symbiotic competence. Each of the mutants was able to generate normal nodules on the host plant alfalfa (Medicago sativa), but had slightly delayed nodule formation, diminished nodulation in the initially susceptible region of the host root, and relatively low representation in nodules following co-inoculation with equal numbers of the parent. When inoculated in growth pouches with increasing dosages of the parental strain, the number of nodules formed in the initially susceptible region of the root increased sigmoidally, with an optimum concentration of about 105 to 106 bacteria/plant. The dose-response behavior of the nonmotile and nonchemotactic mutants was similar, but they required 10- to 30-fold higher concentrations of bacteria to generate the same number of nodules. The distribution frequencies of nodules at different positions along the primary root were very similar for the mutants and parent, indicating that reduced nodulation by the mutants in dose-response experiments probably reflects reduced efficiency of nodule initiation rather than developmentally delayed nodule initiation. The number of bacteria that firmly adsorbed to the host root surface during several hours of incubation was 5- to 20-fold greater for the parent than the mutants. The mutants were also somewhat less effective than their parent as competitors in root adsorption assays. It appears that motility and chemotaxis are quantitatively important traits that facilitate the initial contact and adsorption of symbiotic rhizobia to the host root surface, increase the efficiency of nodule initiation, and increase the rate of infection development.

Full text

PDF
1228

Images in this article

1231Fig. 2
on p.1231

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler J. A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis by Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol. 1973 Jan;74(1):77–91. doi: 10.1099/00221287-74-1-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ames P., Bergman K. Competitive advantage provided by bacterial motility in the formation of nodules by Rhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol. 1981 Nov;148(2):728–p. doi: 10.1128/jb.148.2.728-729.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ames P., Schluederberg S. A., Bergman K. Behavioral mutants of Rhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol. 1980 Feb;141(2):722–727. doi: 10.1128/jb.141.2.722-727.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhuvaneswari T. V., Bhagwat A. A., Bauer W. D. Transient susceptibility of root cells in four common legumes to nodulation by rhizobia. Plant Physiol. 1981 Nov;68(5):1144–1149. doi: 10.1104/pp.68.5.1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhuvaneswari T. V., Mills K. K., Crist D. K., Evans W. R., Bauer W. D. Effects of culture age on symbiotic infectivity of Rhizobium japonicum. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):443–451. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.443-451.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bishop P. E., Dazzo F. B., Appelbaum E. R., Maier R. J., Brill W. J. Intergeneric transfer of genes involved in the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis. Science. 1977 Dec 2;198(4320):938–940. doi: 10.1126/science.929179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Caetano Anollés G., Favelukes G. Host-Symbiont Specificity Expressed during Early Adsorption of Rhizobium meliloti to the Root Surface of Alfalfa. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Aug;52(2):377–382. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.2.377-382.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Caetano Anollés G., Favelukes G. Quantitation of adsorption of rhizobia in low numbers to small legume roots. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Aug;52(2):371–376. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.2.371-376.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Currier W. W., Strobel G. A. Chemotaxis of Rhizobium spp. to Plant Root Exudates. Plant Physiol. 1976 May;57(5):820–823. doi: 10.1104/pp.57.5.820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Currier W. W., Strobel G. A. Chemotaxis of Rhizobium spp. to a Glycoprotein Produced by Birdsfoot Trefoil Roots. Science. 1977 Apr 22;196(4288):434–436. doi: 10.1126/science.196.4288.434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. De Ley J., Rassel A. DNA base composition, flagellation and taxonomy of the genus Rhizobium. J Gen Microbiol. 1965 Oct;41(1):85–91. doi: 10.1099/00221287-41-1-85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. FAHRAEUS G. The infection of clover root hairs by nodule bacteria studied by a simple glass slide technique. J Gen Microbiol. 1957 Apr;16(2):374–381. doi: 10.1099/00221287-16-2-374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gulash M., Ames P., Larosiliere R. C., Bergman K. Rhizobia are attracted to localized sites on legume roots. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Jul;48(1):149–152. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.1.149-152.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Halverson L. J., Stacey G. Host recognition in the Rhizobium-soybean symbiosis : evidence for the involvement of lectin in nodulation. Plant Physiol. 1985 Mar;77(3):621–625. doi: 10.1104/pp.77.3.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Halverson L. J., Stacey G. Host recognition in the Rhizobium-soybean symbiosis: detection of a protein factor in soybean root exudate which is involved in the nodulation process. Plant Physiol. 1984 Jan;74(1):84–89. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.1.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mulligan J. T., Long S. R. Induction of Rhizobium meliloti nodC expression by plant exudate requires nodD. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(19):6609–6613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.19.6609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Napoli C., Albersheim P. Infection and nodulation of clover by nonmotile Rhizobium trifolii. J Bacteriol. 1980 Feb;141(2):979–980. doi: 10.1128/jb.141.2.979-980.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peters N. K., Frost J. W., Long S. R. A plant flavone, luteolin, induces expression of Rhizobium meliloti nodulation genes. Science. 1986 Aug 29;233(4767):977–980. doi: 10.1126/science.3738520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Soby S., Bergman K. Motility and Chemotaxis of Rhizobium meliloti in Soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Nov;46(5):995–998. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.5.995-998.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ziegler R. J., Peirce C., Bergman K. Mapping and cloning of a fla-che region of the Rhizobium meliloti chromosome. J Bacteriol. 1986 Nov;168(2):785–790. doi: 10.1128/jb.168.2.785-790.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES