Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2023 Oct 3;18(10):e0292180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292180

Establishing an online resource to facilitate global collaboration and inclusion of underrepresented populations: Experience from the MJFF Global Genetic Parkinson’s Disease Project

Eva-Juliane Vollstedt 1, Harutyun Madoev 1, Anna Aasly 2, Azlina Ahmad-Annuar 3, Bashayer Al-Mubarak 4, Roy N Alcalay 5,6, Victoria Alvarez 7,8, Ignacio Amorin 9, Grazia Annesi 10, David Arkadir 11, Soraya Bardien 12,13, Roger A Barker 14, Melinda Barkhuizen 15, A Nazli Basak 16, Vincenzo Bonifati 17, Agnita Boon 18, Laura Brighina 19, Kathrin Brockmann 20,21, Andrea Carmine Belin 22, Jonathan Carr 13,23, Jordi Clarimon 24,25, Mario Cornejo-Olivas 26,27, Leonor Correia Guedes 28,29, Jean-Christophe Corvol 30, David Crosiers 31,32,33, Joana Damásio 34,35, Parimal Das 36, Patricia de Carvalho Aguiar 37,38, Anna De Rosa 39, Jolanta Dorszewska 40, Sibel Ertan 41, Rosangela Ferese 42, Joaquim Ferreira 32,43, Emilia Gatto 44, Gençer Genç 45, Nir Giladi 6, Pilar Gómez-Garre 46,47, Hasmet Hanagasi 48, Nobutaka Hattori 49, Faycal Hentati 50, Dorota Hoffman-Zacharska 51, Sergey N Illarioshkin 52, Joseph Jankovic 53, Silvia Jesús 46,47, Valtteri Kaasinen 54,55,56, Anneke Kievit 17, Peter Klivenyi 57, Vladimir Kostic 58, Dariusz Koziorowski 59, Andrea A Kühn 60, Anthony E Lang 61, Shen-Yang Lim 62, Chin-Hsien Lin 63, Katja Lohmann 1, Vladana Markovic 58, Mika Henrik Martikainen 54,56,64, George Mellick 65, Marcelo Merello 64,66,67, Lukasz Milanowski 59, Pablo Mir 46,47, Özgür Öztop-Çakmak 41, Márcia Mattos Gonçalves Pimentel 68, Teeratorn Pulkes 69, Andreas Puschmann 70,71, Ekaterina Rogaeva 72, Esther M Sammler 73,74, Maria Skaalum Petersen 75,76, Matej Skorvanek 77,78, Mariana Spitz 79, Oksana Suchowersky 80, Ai Huey Tan 62, Pichet Termsarasab 69, Avner Thaler 6, Vitor Tumas 81, Enza Maria Valente 82,83, Bart van de Warrenburg 84, Caroline H Williams-Gray 14, Ruey-Mei Wu 63, Baorong Zhang 85, Alexander Zimprich 86, Justin Solle 87, Shalini Padmanabhan 87, Christine Klein 1,*
Editor: Amina Nasri88
PMCID: PMC10547150  PMID: 37788254

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the fastest-growing neurodegenerative disorder, currently affecting ~7 million people worldwide. PD is clinically and genetically heterogeneous, with at least 10% of all cases explained by a monogenic cause or strong genetic risk factor. However, the vast majority of our present data on monogenic PD is based on the investigation of patients of European White ancestry, leaving a large knowledge gap on monogenic PD in underrepresented populations. Gene-targeted therapies are being developed at a fast pace and have started entering clinical trials. In light of these developments, building a global network of centers working on monogenic PD, fostering collaborative research, and establishing a clinical trial-ready cohort is imperative. Based on a systematic review of the English literature on monogenic PD and a successful team science approach, we have built up a network of 59 sites worldwide and have collected information on the availability of data, biomaterials, and facilities. To enable access to this resource and to foster collaboration across centers, as well as between academia and industry, we have developed an interactive map and online tool allowing for a quick overview of available resources, along with an option to filter for specific items of interest. This initiative is currently being merged with the Global Parkinson’s Genetics Program (GP2), which will attract additional centers with a focus on underrepresented sites. This growing resource and tool will facilitate collaborative research and impact the development and testing of new therapies for monogenic and potentially for idiopathic PD patients.

Introduction

As technologies for genetic testing are rapidly developing and are becoming more cost-effective, rare disorders and also rare subtypes of common disorders can increasingly be characterized genetically and thus stratified into genetically defined subgroups. This provides the basis not only to investigate disease mechanisms further but also to develop and test gene-targeted therapies. Parkinson’s disease (PD), the most rapidly growing neurodegenerative disorder [1] can serve as a model disease for this approach, as PD is a common disorder affecting about 7 million people worldwide in 2022, including an estimated 700,000–840,000 (10–12%) hereditary cases with pathogenic genetic variants (monogenic PD and PD due to strong genetic risk factors). In light of the development of gene-targeted therapies for PD, identifying and characterizing carriers of specific genetic pathogenic variants is imperative.

Only a small fraction of the estimated number of subjects with monogenic PD worldwide are currently represented in the literature [25]. Most study centers publishing in the English language are located in Europe and North America [6]. There is evidence for variable penetrance and expressivity of the disease across populations and ethnicities in monogenic forms of PD [2]. However, the majority of published cases are reported to be White and originate from Europe or North America, whereas most African, Asian, and South American populations, especially indigenous people, are highly underrepresented. Little is known about the actual worldwide epidemiology, frequency of population-specific variants, and possible local factors influencing the manifestation and course of the disease. Notably, even for published cases, the availability of detailed genetic and clinical data is limited, and genetically stratified clinical trial-ready cohorts are highly sought after.

Global collaboration both within academic research and with the pharmaceutical industry is paramount to expanding our knowledge of disease mechanisms, developing gene-targeted medications, and testing them in clinical trials. Building an international network of researchers from academia and industry will facilitate including more underrepresented populations in investigations and trials, both by enhancing the visibility of existing study centers and by providing genetic testing facilities. To open this network to new members and specifically allow researchers or clinicians from currently underrepresented countries to engage in these collaborative efforts, we established an online resource that provides an overview of centers worldwide working on monogenic PD and their facilities. While this effort sprung from the MJFF Global Genetic Parkinson’s Disease Project [6], it has recently been integrated into the Global Parkinson’s Genetics Program (GP2, https://gp2.org/), which will build global will and capacity while addressing emerging research questions in PD genetics [7].

Methods

How to find eligible centers?

Performing a systematic literature review on monogenic PD in the English literature [3, 4], our group identified the need for a new, systematic, and global approach to obtain more detailed clinical and genetic data from individuals with monogenic PD. Starting in March 2018, we contacted by email all corresponding authors from articles that we had included in the review and ran an online survey to collect information on the number of subjects with monogenic PD they follow, along with available clinical and genetic data. In a second step, we invited all researchers to provide individual case-level data and offered a small per-case fee to reimburse them for their effort to retrieve and enter the data in another online survey. The vast majority of participating centers expressed enthusiasm about our project, their strong interest in being part of the emerging study group, and support for further collaborative efforts.

To establish the online resource, we contacted all participating researchers, including their collaborators (n = 112). We received responses from 59 centers (53%) in 36 countries on all inhabited continents (Europe (n = 33), North (n = 4) and South America (n = 8), Asia (n = 10), Australia (n = 1), Africa (n = 3)). All centers have agreed to be contacted by researchers and the pharmaceutical industry, while the majority of centers (n = 41, 69%) would prefer not to be contacted directly but to have requests filtered first. The Monogenic Network of GP2 will handle collaboration requests. All participants provided written informed consent to the publication of the provided data. The ethics committee of the University of Lübeck confirmed that no ethical approval was required for this study.

How to obtain the data of interest?

An essential part of this project was communication and information. Having identified eligible researchers, we sent out information emails about our project and kept all participants updated in regular progress emails. To further improve the retention rate, we ensured a quick response in case of any queries and consistently named a specific contact person. When designing the survey, we aimed at providing an accessible online format, allowing different browser types and devices (again, our team was available and provided help in case of any technical difficulties), kept it brief, and phrased questions in a concise and explicit way (Table 1). Whenever possible, questions were designed to allow single-choice answers only, and free text fields were limited to maximize comparison between centers. For convenience, already available information (such as the name and location of the study center) was prefilled by our team. Participants received an invitation email including a link to their individual survey. Once complete, the survey was submitted by the participant. We sent out two rounds of reminder emails, personally addressing each participant, to improve the response rate and make sure all invitees received their email and got the opportunity to present their study center.

Table 1. Items assessed in the online survey.

Site details Name of site
Principal investigator
City/ Country
Active in other PD projects
New PD patients/year
Genetic testing available
How are genetic testing costs covered?
Qualified genetic counseling available?
Already performing clinical trials?
Availability of clinical data Sex
Age
Age at onset
UPDRS
Hoehn and Yahr scale
Nonmotor scales
Olfactory testing
Data sharing IRB consent
Shipment outside the country
Availability of biomaterials DNA/RNA/Serum/Plasma/whole blood/CSF/fibroblasts/iPSCs/brain tissue (storage?)
Availability of Omics Genomics/ Transcriptomics/ Proteomics/ Metabolomics
Laboratory facilities CSF handling
Serum Plasma handling
Culturing of fibroblasts
Isolation of cells from whole blood
Generation of iPSCs
Neuropathology
MRI
SPECT/PET
TCS

PD: Parkinson’s disease; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; IRB: institutional review board; DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid; RNA: Ribonucleic acid; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; iPSCs: induced pluripotent stem cells; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, SPECT/PET: Single-photon emission computed tomography/positron emission tomography, TCS: transcranial sonography

After completing the survey, we reviewed the data and double-checked for any inaccurate entries. In case of ambiguity, we reached out to the respective researcher for approval of the correction. After this first round of quality checks, we programmed the online tool and uploaded the provided data. In a second round of quality checks and to allow for possible updates, we invited all participants to review and verify the provided data and obtained permission to publish the presented resource. Regular updates of the resource and map will be provided biannually, and ongoing projects and trials using the network will be listed on the website to facilitate further collaboration while avoiding duplication of efforts.

Results

Our two-part online tool is now available at https://gp2networkdev.wpengine.com/monogenic-resource-map/. Firstly, it includes a searchable online table that allows for filtering for specific characteristics of interest (e.g., location of the center, available facilities, Table 1). Second, a map displays the locations of all research centers and provides individual profiles with information on each center (Fig 1).

Fig 1. The monogenic resource map.

Fig 1

This world map displays the distribution of all participating centers worldwide. The pins mark the location of the study centers. Clicking on a pin opens the respective study center profile. The profiles summarize information on the site and the availability of demographic and clinical data, biomaterials, methods, and facilities and provide information on other collaborative projects that the study center is part of.

The average number of new PD patients per year reported by the participants until May 2022 is 196. Genetic testing is regularly performed by 37 (63%) of the centers, and the costs are predominantly covered by in-house or external funding sources (39%), followed by coverage by health insurance and the patients themselves (10% each). The availability of biomaterials varies depending on how difficult they are to obtain, ranging from 53 centers (90%) reporting the availability of DNA for at least a subset of cases to 8 centers (14%) reporting the availability of brain tissue (Fig 2). Laboratory facilities that are part of the standard clinical workup like serum and plasma handling, are more frequently available (at 53 centers, 90%) than more specific ones that are more costly or require special training, such as the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (at 24 centers, 41%; Fig 3).

Fig 2. Availability of biomaterials.

Fig 2

Number of centers reporting availability of the listed biomaterials. DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid, RNA: Ribonucleic acid, CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, iPSCs: induced pluripotent stem cells.

Fig 3. Availability of methods and facilities.

Fig 3

Number of centers reporting availability of the listed methods and facilities. CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, iPSCs: induced pluripotent stem cells, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, SPECT/PET: Single-photon emission computed tomography/positron emission tomography, TCS: transcranial sonography.

Discussion and conclusions

Using a powerful team science approach, we have established a global network of academic centers involved in the clinical care of patients with monogenic PD and with a high interest in collaboration, research, and gene-targeted therapies for PD. Based on a systematic search of the world literature on monogenic PD published in the English language, we have tried to be as inclusive as possible. We have set up the project to serve as a growing resource open to all interested participants. Having focused our initial approach on articles in published in English is a limitation, as we certainly missed centers engaged in the care of patients with monogenic PD who did not publish on this topic or in a language other than English. This includes predominantly centers from regions with high percentages of underrepresented populations. In order to actively broaden this network and to reach out to active centers that have not yet published on monogenic PD (in English), the MJFF Global Genetic Parkinson’s Disease Project is currently being merged within GP2, which presently includes 119 centers that will be approached to join this effort if not yet part of the network. Information on GP2 is already available in several languages (https://gp2networkdev.wpengine.com/monogenic-resource-map/), including Arabic, Mandarin, French, German, Japanese, and Spanish. Through this merger, we expect the resource to proliferate and, most importantly, to include an increasing number of previously underrepresented populations and centers.

To facilitate access to this resource and to foster collaboration across centers, as well as between academia and industry, we have developed an interactive map and online tool allowing for a quick overview and descriptive statistics on available data, materials, and facilities, as well as for filtering for specific items of interest, for example, centers who have induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines of PRKN mutation carriers.

We will exploit and expand existing networks through this project and resource to make more clinical and research centers visible and study subjects available to the clinical and basic PD research community. Furthermore, such studies will spur collaborations across global clinical sites and between academia and industry, thus facilitating and expediting the testing of new therapies in relevant PD genetic subtypes. Given the emerging knowledge about disease mechanisms contributing to PD pathogenesis, our hope is that different subpopulations of idiopathic PD subjects would also benefit from these large genetic cohort-based efforts.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all contributing researchers for supporting this project.

Data Availability

The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from https://gp2networkdev.wpengine.com/monogenic-resource-map/.

Funding Statement

CK received a grant for this project by the Michael J Fox Foundation (ID 15015.03, https://www.michaeljfox.org/). Roger Barker and Caroline Williams-Gray are supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funders reviewed the study design and suggested additional items for the survey. They had no role in data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.

References

Decision Letter 0

Ahmed Nasreldein

20 Mar 2023

PONE-D-22-35560Establishing an online resource to facilitate global collaboration and inclusion of underrepresented populations: experience from the MJFF Global Genetic Parkinson’s Disease ProjectPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Klein,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 04 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ahmed Nasreldein, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. You indicated that ethical approval was not necessary for your study. We understand that the framework for ethical oversight requirements for studies of this type may differ depending on the setting and we would appreciate some further clarification regarding your research. Could you please provide further details on why your study is exempt from the need for approval and confirmation from your institutional review board or research ethics committee (e.g., in the form of a letter or email correspondence) that ethics review was not necessary for this study? Please include a copy of the correspondence as an "Other" file."

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“CK received a grant for this project by the Michael J Fox Foundation (ID 15015.03, https://www.michaeljfox.org/).”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

“This project is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation. Roger Barker and Caroline Williams-Gray are supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014).  The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.”

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“CK received a grant for this project by the Michael J Fox Foundation (ID 15015.03, https://www.michaeljfox.org/).”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

6. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

“I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Roy N. Alcalay received consulting fees from Avrobio, Caraway, Ono Therapeutics, GSK, Merck, Sanofi, Janssen and grants from the Michael J. Fox Foundation, DOD, the Parkinson’s Disease Foundation, and the NIH. Melinda Barkhuizen received a PhD scholarship from the National Research Foundation of South Africa (grant numbers 89230 and 98217) and internal funding from the research center where the study was conducted (DST/NWU Preclinical Drug Development Platform, North-West University, South Africa); Ampath Pathology laboratories in South Africa donated services in the form of drawing participant blood for DNA extractions, Several neurologists in South Africa assisted the authors with identifying patients with Parkinson`s disease and referring them to the genotyping study; the North-West University, South Africa provided Ethical oversight and approval of the genotyping project. Vincenzo Bonifati received grants from Stichting Parkinson Fonds (Netherlands) and Alzheimer Nederland, he received honoraria from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS), for lectures and as Chair of the International Congress Scientific Program Committee (2020-2021), and from Elsevier Ltd. as co-Editor in Chief of the journal Parkinsonism & Related Disorders (2018-current); he is unpaid member of the Stichting Parkinson Fonds (Netherlands). Kathrin Brockmann received grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; PDStrat; FKZ 031L0137B) and from the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), consulting fees from Abbvie, Lundbeck, UCB, Zambon, Roche, and honoraria from Abbvie and UCB. Jordi Clarimon is full-time employee at Lundbeck A/S (Denmark). Mario Cornejo-Olivas has subcontracts with Cleveland Clinic and San Marcos Foundation for recruiting participants for the LARGE PD study in Peru. Jean-Christophe Corvol received grants from Sanofi and the Michael J. Fox Foundation, consulting fees from Biogen, UCB, Denali, Idorsia, Prevail therapeutics, Theranexus, and honoraria from Biogen. Joana Damásio received honoraria from Zambon Pharmaceuticals. Anna De Rosa received grants for ROPAD – the Rostock International Parkinson’s Disease Study, sponsored by Centogene and grants from Zambon and AIFA (Italian Agency of Drug), and she is member of the advisory board at BIAL. Joaquim Ferreira received grants from Fundação MSD (Portugal), Novartis, Medtronic, and Abbvie, and lecture fees from Lundbeck, Abbvie, BIAL, Biogen, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, ONO, Affiris, and Zambon, payment for expert testimony from Novartis, and he participates in advisory boards of Lundbeck, Abbvie, BIAL, Affiris, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and Zambon; he is employed by CNS (Campus Néurologico Sénior) and the Medical Faculty of Lisbon. Emilia Gatto received consulting fees from Bago Argentina, honoraria from Bago Argentina,UCB, IPMDS, and Europharm, and participates in advisory boards of Bago Argentina and UCB. Nir Giladi received grants from the Michael J Fox Foundation, The National Parkinson Foundation, The European Union, The Israel Science Foundation Teva, NNE program, Biogen, Ionis, Sieratzki Family Foundation, and The Aufzien Academic Center in Tel-Aviv University; he holds royalties or licenses at Lysosomal Therapeutics (LTI); he received consulting fees from Sionara, NeuroDerm, Pharma2B, Denali, Neuron23, Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, and Abbvie; he received honoraria from Abbvie, Sanofi-Genzyme, and the Movement Disorder Society. Nobutaka Hattori received grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS; 18H04043, 21H04820, 19K22603), the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED; JP20dm0307101, JP20dm0207070, JP20ek0109358, JP19ek0109393, JP19gm0710011, JP19km0405206), Health Labour Sciences Research Grant (20FC1049, H29-FC1-062, H29-FC1-033), and the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJMS2024-5); he participates in advisory boards at Dai-Nippon Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, TEIJIN PHARMA LIMITED, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Biogen Idec Japan, and Kissei Pharmaceutical; he receives consulting fees from Hisamitsu Pharma; he received honoraria from Dai-Nippon Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, AbbVie GK, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Novartis Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, FP Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Nihon Medi-physics, and Daiichi Sankyo; he received payment for expert testimony from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma; he received support for attending meeting from Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Kyowa Kirin; he has 17 patents planned or pending and 5 issued; he is Team Leader at the Neurodegenerative Disorders Collaborative Laboratory, RIKEN Center for Brain Science; he holds equity stock (8%) of PARKINSON Laboratories Co. Ltd.,  unrelated to the submitted work. Silvia Jesús has received grants from “Consejería de Salud y Familias” PI-0459-2018, “acción B Clínicos-Investigdores” B-0007-2019 and from the “instituto de Salud Carlos III” PI-18/01898; she received honoraria from Abbvie, Bial, Merz, UCB, Italfarmaco, Zambon and Server. Valtteri Kaasinen received grants from Turku University Foundation, Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, and the Finnish Cultural Foundation; he received consulting fees from Nordic Infucare, Abbvie, and

Adamant Health; he received honoraria from Nordic Infucare and Abbvie; he received Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Nordic Infucare; he participates on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board at Nordic Infucare and Abbvie; he is board member of the Finnish Neurological Society. Christine Klein received royalties from Oxford University Press; she received consulting fees from Centogene and Retromer Therapeutics; she received payment or honoraria from Desitin Pharma; she received support to attend meetings from the Movement Disorder Society; she participates on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board at the Else Kroener Fresenius Foundation. Peter Klivenyi received honoraria from Abbvie and Medtronic. Vladimir Kostic received Grant 17590 from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia; he received honoraria from Novartis and Boehringer Ingelheim. Shen-Yang Lim received the following grants, (i) Stipend - Global Parkinson's Genetics Program (GP2) Working Group Co-Lead Award, from the Michael J. Fox Foundation, (ii) Michael J. Fox Foundation (Grant 18305: "Identifying leucocyte and urine biomarkers in PD patients with LRRK2 G2385R variant"). George Mellick received grants from the National Health and Medical Research Foundation, Australia (APP1151854, APP1084560). Lukasz Milanowski received grants from the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange Iwanowska’s Fellowship PPN/IWA/2018/1/00006/U/00001/01, the APDA, the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP) and the Haworth Family Professorship in Neurodegenerative Diseases Fund. Pablo mir received grants from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (RTC2019-007150-1), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (ISCIII-FEDER, PI19/01576), and the Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social de la Junta de Andalucía (PE-0210-2018); he received payment or honoraria for lectures from Abbvie, Abbott, and Zambon; he received Support for attending meetings and travel from Abbvie. Shalini Padmanabhan is employed by the Michael J. Fox Foundation. Andreas Puschmann received grants from Region Skåne, Sweden, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden, The Swedish Parkinson Academy, The Swedish Parkinson Foundation (Parkinsonfonden), MultiPark – a strategic research environment at Lund University, and Bundy Academy, Sweden; he received honoraria from Elsevier (Associate editor for Parkinsonism and Related Disorders), from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS), and from the International Association of Parkinsonism and Related Disorders; he received support for travels from the International Association of Parkinsonism and Related Disorders; he is board member of the International Association of Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. Mariana Spitz received funding from Centogene for the ROPAD study; she received support for travels from Roche. Justin Solle is employed by the Michel J. Fox Foundation. Oksana Suchowersky received grants from Roche and WaveLifeSciences; she holds royalties or licenses at UpToDate; she received consulting fees from Abbvie and Sunovion; she received honoraria from the World Parkinson Conference; she participates in advisory boards at Alexion; she is board member of the Parkinson Society Alberta. Pichet Termsarasab received book royalties from Elsevier and Springer Nature Switzerland; he received honoraria for manuscript writing from MedLink Neurology and for lectures from Viatris. Bart van de Warrenburg received grants from Radboudumc, ZonMW, Hersenstichting, Gossweiler Foundation, and the Michael J Fox Foundation; he holds royalties or licenses at BSL Springer Nature; he received consulting fees from uniQure; he received honoraria from UKM Medical Center Kuala Lumpur; he participates in Medical advisory board of patient organizations (unpaid); he is unpaid member of Steering committees or executive boards of various research consortia; he received a wearable sensor set by Brugling Fund/Hersenstichting. Caroline H. Williams-Gray collaborates with Astra-Zeneca on the microbiome in Parkinson’s disease; she received consultancy fees from Modus Outcomes and Evidera, Inc./GlaxoSmithKline; she received honoraria from Profile Pharma Limited. Eva-Juliane Vollstedt, Harutyun Madoev, Anna Aasly, Azlina Ahmad-Annuar, Bashayer Al-Mubarak, Victoria Alvarez, Ignacio Amorin, Grazia Annesi, David Arkadir, Soraya Bardien, Roger A. Barker, A. Nazli Basak, Agnita Boon, Laura Brighina, Andrea Carmine Belin, Jonathan Carr, Leonor Correia Guedes, David Crosiers, Parimal Das, Patricia de Carvalho Aguiar, Jolanta Dorszewska, Sibel Ertan, Rosangela Ferese, Gençer Genç, Pilar Gómez-Garre, Hasmet Hanagasi, Faycal Hentati, Dorota Hoffman-Zacharska, Sergey N. Illarioshkin, Joseph Jankovic,  Anneke Kievit, Dariusz Koziorowski, Andrea A. Kühn, Anthony E. Lang, Chin-Hsien Lin, Katja Lohmann, Vladana Markovic, Mika Henrik Martikainen, Marcelo Merello, Özgür Öztop-Çakmak, Márcia Mattos Gonçalves Pimentel, Teeratorn Pulkes, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Esther M. Sammler, Maria Skaalum Petersen, Matej Skorvanek, Ai Huey Tan, Avner Thaler, Vitor Tumas, Enza Maria Valente, Ruey-Mei Wu, Baorong Zhang, and Alexander Zimprich report no conflict of interest.”

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

7. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

8. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

9. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you very much for the impressive work and congratulations on the new resources.

Here are some comments from my side:

Please check the link provided: https://gp2networkdev.wpengine.com/monogenic-resource-map/ as it doesn’t show the mentioned contents: the table and the map

Revise the Editing, some phrases are unclear (example: one sentence was highlighted in yellow in the attached manuscript)

Figures should be in a better resolution.

Methodology:

Is the mentioned systematic review done first to find the centres and researchers published elsewhere?

Would you please provide the flow chart of the conducted systematic review? or a table with the included studies upon which the whole process was base?

Reviewer #2: The paper is simple and outlines a methodology to advance research into monogenic Parkinson's disease.

My hope will be that advancing genetic research may be of value to small number of PD patients but the vast majority of PD patients in underrepresented populations need access to better care for their PD which is significantly lacking so there is effort to advance upcoming genetic treatment but minimal to no effort to advance existence treatments for millions of affected populations, perhaps reprioritization of funds and resources is required.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Shaimaa El-Jaafary

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-35560_reviewer-2.pdf

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 3;18(10):e0292180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292180.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


27 May 2023

Dear Dr. Chenette and dear Dr. El-Jaafary,

We would like to thank you and the anonymous reviewer for the thoughtful review of our manuscript. We have tried to incorporate all of the helpful suggestions and comments as detailed below in our point-by-point reply.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

- Thank you very much for providing the style templates, we have formatted the manuscript accordingly.

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

- For our study, we invited researchers worldwide to complete an online survey on available facilities and data, no actual patient data was shared. The researchers who participated were informed about our plan to publish the information they shared in our online resource tool and as a manuscript, and they all gave their consent for publication via email.

3. You indicated that ethical approval was not necessary for your study. We understand that the framework for ethical oversight requirements for studies of this type may differ depending on the setting and we would appreciate some further clarification regarding your research. Could you please provide further details on why your study is exempt from the need for approval and confirmation from your institutional review board or research ethics committee (e.g., in the form of a letter or email correspondence) that ethics review was not necessary for this study? Please include a copy of the correspondence as an "Other" file."

- Our study was an online survey of PIs at various international centers dealing with genetic PD. We wanted to know what clinical or research facilities are available at the centers. For example, we asked whether there is a clinical study center, whether there is neuropathology on site, whether fibroblasts can be cultured, plasma extracted, etc. Thus, we are not interested in "direct" data from patients or subjects, but in a description of centers to facilitate clinical and research exchange between these centers dealing with rare genetic forms of PD. Attached please find a letter from our ethics committee confirming that no ethics vote was necessary for this study.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“CK received a grant for this project by the Michael J Fox Foundation (ID 15015.03, https://www.michaeljfox.org/).”

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

- The funders reviewed the study design and suggested additional items for the survey. They had no role in data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.

5. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

“This project is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation. Roger Barker and Caroline Williams-Gray are supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.”

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“CK received a grant for this project by the Michael J Fox Foundation (ID 15015.03, https://www.michaeljfox.org/).”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

- Thank you very much for pointing this out. We removed the funding-related text from the acknowledgment section and would like to ask you to amend the Funding Statement as follows: “CK received a grant for this project by the Michael J Fox Foundation (ID 15015.03, https://www.michaeljfox.org/). Roger Barker and Caroline Williams-Gray are supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.”

6. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

“I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Roy N. Alcalay received consulting fees from Avrobio, Caraway, Ono Therapeutics, GSK, Merck, Sanofi, Janssen and grants from the Michael J. Fox Foundation, DOD, the Parkinson’s Disease Foundation, and the NIH. Melinda Barkhuizen received a PhD scholarship from the National Research Foundation of South Africa (grant numbers 89230 and 98217) and internal funding from the research center where the study was conducted (DST/NWU Preclinical Drug Development Platform, North-West University, South Africa); Ampath Pathology laboratories in South Africa donated services in the form of drawing participant blood for DNA extractions, Several neurologists in South Africa assisted the authors with identifying patients with Parkinson`s disease and referring them to the genotyping study; the North-West University, South Africa provided Ethical oversight and approval of the genotyping project. Vincenzo Bonifati received grants from Stichting Parkinson Fonds (Netherlands) and Alzheimer Nederland, he received honoraria from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS), for lectures and as Chair of the International Congress Scientific Program Committee (2020-2021), and from Elsevier Ltd. as co-Editor in Chief of the journal Parkinsonism & Related Disorders (2018-current); he is unpaid member of the Stichting Parkinson Fonds (Netherlands). Kathrin Brockmann received grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; PDStrat; FKZ 031L0137B) and from the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), consulting fees from Abbvie, Lundbeck, UCB, Zambon, Roche, and honoraria from Abbvie and UCB. Jordi Clarimon is full-time employee at Lundbeck A/S (Denmark). Mario Cornejo-Olivas has subcontracts with Cleveland Clinic and San Marcos Foundation for recruiting participants for the LARGE PD study in Peru. Jean-Christophe Corvol received grants from Sanofi and the Michael J. Fox Foundation, consulting fees from Biogen, UCB, Denali, Idorsia, Prevail therapeutics, Theranexus, and honoraria from Biogen. Joana Damásio received honoraria from Zambon Pharmaceuticals. Anna De Rosa received grants for ROPAD – the Rostock International Parkinson’s Disease Study, sponsored by Centogene and grants from Zambon and AIFA (Italian Agency of Drug), and she is member of the advisory board at BIAL. Joaquim Ferreira received grants from Fundação MSD (Portugal), Novartis, Medtronic, and Abbvie, and lecture fees from Lundbeck, Abbvie, BIAL, Biogen, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, ONO, Affiris, and Zambon, payment for expert testimony from Novartis, and he participates in advisory boards of Lundbeck, Abbvie, BIAL, Affiris, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and Zambon; he is employed by CNS (Campus Néurologico Sénior) and the Medical Faculty of Lisbon. Emilia Gatto received consulting fees from Bago Argentina, honoraria from Bago Argentina,UCB, IPMDS, and Europharm, and participates in advisory boards of Bago Argentina and UCB. Nir Giladi received grants from the Michael J Fox Foundation, The National Parkinson Foundation, The European Union, The Israel Science Foundation Teva, NNE program, Biogen, Ionis, Sieratzki Family Foundation, and The Aufzien Academic Center in Tel-Aviv University; he holds royalties or licenses at Lysosomal Therapeutics (LTI); he received consulting fees from Sionara, NeuroDerm, Pharma2B, Denali, Neuron23, Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, and Abbvie; he received honoraria from Abbvie, Sanofi-Genzyme, and the Movement Disorder Society. Nobutaka Hattori received grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS; 18H04043, 21H04820, 19K22603), the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED; JP20dm0307101, JP20dm0207070, JP20ek0109358, JP19ek0109393, JP19gm0710011, JP19km0405206), Health Labour Sciences Research Grant (20FC1049, H29-FC1-062, H29-FC1-033), and the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJMS2024-5); he participates in advisory boards at Dai-Nippon Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, TEIJIN PHARMA LIMITED, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Biogen Idec Japan, and Kissei Pharmaceutical; he receives consulting fees from Hisamitsu Pharma; he received honoraria from Dai-Nippon Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, AbbVie GK, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Novartis Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, FP Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Nihon Medi-physics, and Daiichi Sankyo; he received payment for expert testimony from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma; he received support for attending meeting from Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Kyowa Kirin; he has 17 patents planned or pending and 5 issued; he is Team Leader at the Neurodegenerative Disorders Collaborative Laboratory, RIKEN Center for Brain Science; he holds equity stock (8%) of PARKINSON Laboratories Co. Ltd., unrelated to the submitted work. Silvia Jesús has received grants from “Consejería de Salud y Familias” PI-0459-2018, “acción B Clínicos-Investigdores” B-0007-2019 and from the “instituto de Salud Carlos III” PI-18/01898; she received honoraria from Abbvie, Bial, Merz, UCB, Italfarmaco, Zambon and Server. Valtteri Kaasinen received grants from Turku University Foundation, Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, and the Finnish Cultural Foundation; he received consulting fees from Nordic Infucare, Abbvie, and Adamant Health; he received honoraria from Nordic Infucare and Abbvie; he received Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Nordic Infucare; he participates on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board at Nordic Infucare and Abbvie; he is board member of the Finnish Neurological Society. Christine Klein received royalties from Oxford University Press; she received consulting fees from Centogene and Retromer Therapeutics; she received payment or honoraria from Desitin Pharma; she received support to attend meetings from the Movement Disorder Society; she participates on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board at the Else Kroener Fresenius Foundation. Peter Klivenyi received honoraria from Abbvie and Medtronic. Vladimir Kostic received Grant 17590 from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia; he received honoraria from Novartis and Boehringer Ingelheim. Shen-Yang Lim received the following grants, (i) Stipend - Global Parkinson's Genetics Program (GP2) Working Group Co-Lead Award, from the Michael J. Fox Foundation, (ii) Michael J. Fox Foundation (Grant 18305: "Identifying leucocyte and urine biomarkers in PD patients with LRRK2 G2385R variant"). George Mellick received grants from the National Health and Medical Research Foundation, Australia (APP1151854, APP1084560). Lukasz Milanowski received grants from the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange Iwanowska’s Fellowship PPN/IWA/2018/1/00006/U/00001/01, the APDA, the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP) and the Haworth Family Professorship in Neurodegenerative Diseases Fund. Pablo mir received grants from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (RTC2019-007150-1), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (ISCIII-FEDER, PI19/01576), and the Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social de la Junta de Andalucía (PE-0210-2018); he received payment or honoraria for lectures from Abbvie, Abbott, and Zambon; he received Support for attending meetings and travel from Abbvie. Shalini Padmanabhan is employed by the Michael J. Fox Foundation. Andreas Puschmann received grants from Region Skåne, Sweden, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden, The Swedish Parkinson Academy, The Swedish Parkinson Foundation (Parkinsonfonden), MultiPark – a strategic research environment at Lund University, and Bundy Academy, Sweden; he received honoraria from Elsevier (Associate editor for Parkinsonism and Related Disorders), from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS), and from the International Association of Parkinsonism and Related Disorders; he received support for travels from the International Association of Parkinsonism and Related Disorders; he is board member of the International Association of Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. Mariana Spitz received funding from Centogene for the ROPAD study; she received support for travels from Roche. Justin Solle is employed by the Michel J. Fox Foundation. Oksana Suchowersky received grants from Roche and WaveLifeSciences; she holds royalties or licenses at UpToDate; she received consulting fees from Abbvie and Sunovion; she received honoraria from the World Parkinson Conference; she participates in advisory boards at Alexion; she is board member of the Parkinson Society Alberta. Pichet Termsarasab received book royalties from Elsevier and Springer Nature Switzerland; he received honoraria for manuscript writing from MedLink Neurology and for lectures from Viatris. Bart van de Warrenburg received grants from Radboudumc, ZonMW, Hersenstichting, Gossweiler Foundation, and the Michael J Fox Foundation; he holds royalties or licenses at BSL Springer Nature; he received consulting fees from uniQure; he received honoraria from UKM Medical Center Kuala Lumpur; he participates in Medical advisory board of patient organizations (unpaid); he is unpaid member of Steering committees or executive boards of various research consortia; he received a wearable sensor set by Brugling Fund/Hersenstichting. Caroline H. Williams-Gray collaborates with Astra-Zeneca on the microbiome in Parkinson’s disease; she received consultancy fees from Modus Outcomes and Evidera, Inc./GlaxoSmithKline; she received honoraria from Profile Pharma Limited. Eva-Juliane Vollstedt, Harutyun Madoev, Anna Aasly, Azlina Ahmad-Annuar, Bashayer Al-Mubarak, Victoria Alvarez, Ignacio Amorin, Grazia Annesi, David Arkadir, Soraya Bardien, Roger A. Barker, A. Nazli Basak, Agnita Boon, Laura Brighina, Andrea Carmine Belin, Jonathan Carr, Leonor Correia Guedes, David Crosiers, Parimal Das, Patricia de Carvalho Aguiar, Jolanta Dorszewska, Sibel Ertan, Rosangela Ferese, Gençer Genç, Pilar Gómez-Garre, Hasmet Hanagasi, Faycal Hentati, Dorota Hoffman-Zacharska, Sergey N. Illarioshkin, Joseph Jankovic, Anneke Kievit, Dariusz Koziorowski, Andrea A. Kühn, Anthony E. Lang, Chin-Hsien Lin, Katja Lohmann, Vladana Markovic, Mika Henrik Martikainen, Marcelo Merello, Özgür Öztop-Çakmak, Márcia Mattos Gonçalves Pimentel, Teeratorn Pulkes, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Esther M. Sammler, Maria Skaalum Petersen, Matej Skorvanek, Ai Huey Tan, Avner Thaler, Vitor Tumas, Enza Maria Valente, Ruey-Mei Wu, Baorong Zhang, and Alexander Zimprich report no conflict of interest.”

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

- We confirm that the reported competing interest section does not alter our adherence to the PLOS ONE policies od sharing data and materials. Please include the following Competing Interest statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.”

7. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

- We added the ORCID iD for the corresponding author as requested.

8. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

- Thank you very much for your advice regarding the copyright. We altered Figure 1 using a non-copyrighted graphic.

9. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

- We confirm that the provided reference list is correct and nine of the cited papers have been retracted.

Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1:

Thank you very much for the impressive work and congratulations on the new resources.

Here are some comments from my side:

Please check the link provided: https://gp2networkdev.wpengine.com/monogenic-resource-map/ as it doesn’t show the mentioned contents: the table and the map

- The link is now fully functional in all common browsers (Safari, Firefox, Google Chrome, and Microsoft Edge).

Revise the Editing, some phrases are unclear (example: one sentence was highlighted in yellow in the attached manuscript)

- Thank you very much for pointing this out, we corrected the respective sentence.

Figures should be in a better resolution.

- We now provided all figures in a higher resolution.

Methodology:

Is the mentioned systematic review done first to find the centres and researchers published elsewhere?

Would you please provide the flow chart of the conducted systematic review? or a table with the included studies upon which the whole process was base?

- The identification of suitable study centers and researchers was indeed part of two other projects conducted prior to this study by our team (MDSGene, PMID 29644727 and 30357936; MJFF Global Genetic PD Project PMID 31155756 and 36692014). A flow chart on the systematic review is included as Figure 2 in “Using global team science to identify genetic Parkinson’s disease worldwide”, Vollstedt et al. 2019 (PMID 31155756, please see figure below).

Figure 2 from “Using global team science to identify genetic Parkinson’s disease worldwide”, Vollstedt et al (PMID 31155756):

Response quantification.

Of the n=336 researchers we contacted, n=125 (98% of those who completed the survey) were interested in further collaboration on genetic PD. Of those researchers who did not respond to our invitation to participate, we identified n=52 (29%) to be affiliated with one of the responding centers.

Reviewer #2:

The paper is simple and outlines a methodology to advance research into monogenic Parkinson's disease.

My hope will be that advancing genetic research may be of value to small number of PD patients but the vast majority of PD patients in underrepresented populations need access to better care for their PD which is significantly lacking so there is effort to advance upcoming genetic treatment but minimal to no effort to advance existence treatments for millions of affected populations, perhaps reprioritization of funds and resources is required.

- Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts on this very important matter. We also think that there is an urgent need to improve patient care for individuals with idiopathic PD. Our hope is that studying disease mechanisms in genetically predefined groups of patients will provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of the disease overall and will facilitate drug development and improve patient care for individuals with idiopathic PD as well. The disparity the reviewer mentions is a major unmet need. With the present manuscript and resource, we hope to highlight currently underrepresented centers and their resources (which are often unknown to other researchers or to pharmaceutical companies). Some of these underrepresented sites follow a relatively large number of pathogenic variant carriers; thus, our map may also aid in flagging such centers that would be good candidates for clinical trial sites and, thus, could offer their patients inclusion in gene-targeted clinical trials.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Christine Klein, MD, FEAN

Attachment

Submitted filename: Rebuttal_PONE_Vollstedt_2023_04_04_CK_JV.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Amina Nasri

29 Aug 2023

PONE-D-22-35560R1Establishing an online resource to facilitate global collaboration and inclusion of underrepresented populations: experience from the MJFF Global Genetic Parkinson’s Disease ProjectPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Klein,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 13 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Amina Nasri

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear Dr. Klein and co-authers.

Thank you very much for addressing all the comments.

The revised version only contain fig.2 from Vollstedt et al. So, please provide the figures (number 1,2,3) mentioned within the text in higher resolution as modified.

Reviewer #3: The authors have addressed the comments of the reviewers in detail and done so satisfactorily. The overall objective of the project described is to increase representation of under-represented populations. This flags one of the apparent shortcomings of the project which is that although a very significant population of URPs is in sub-Saharan black African populations across east, west and central Africa, the sites included in the efforts starkly exclude any sites from these African regions. Northern Africa (Tunisia) and Southern Africa are not typically regarded as underrepresented in terms of the ancestry of the population and their inclusion in genetic studies and one would presume that it would be important to have included other African regions. Indeed, excluding a significant underrepresented population in a project that seeks to enhance inclusion of underrepresented populations does seem counter-intuitive. The authors may wish to either clearly describe this as a limitation or, in implementing the initiative, address this drawback.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Shaimaa El-Jaafary

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 3;18(10):e0292180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292180.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


5 Sep 2023

Dear Dr. Chenette,

We would like to thank you, Dr. El-Jaafary, and the anonymous Reviewer #3 again for the second review of our manuscript. We have addressed the reviewer’s comment below and amended the manuscript accordingly.

Reviewer #3: The authors have addressed the comments of the reviewers in detail and done so satisfactorily. The overall objective of the project described is to increase representation of under-represented populations. This flags one of the apparent shortcomings of the project which is that although a very significant population of URPs is in sub-Saharan black African populations across east, west and central Africa, the sites included in the efforts starkly exclude any sites from these African regions. Northern Africa (Tunisia) and Southern Africa are not typically regarded as underrepresented in terms of the ancestry of the population and their inclusion in genetic studies and one would presume that it would be important to have included other African regions. Indeed, excluding a significant underrepresented population in a project that seeks to enhance inclusion of underrepresented populations does seem counter-intuitive. The authors may wish to either clearly describe this as a limitation or, in implementing the initiative, address this drawback.

Thank you very much for alluding to this misunderstanding. The reason for missing these centers is actually not active exclusion but lies in our initial approach to identifying suitable centers. For the initial step of this project, we contacted the corresponding authors of publications on genetic Parkinson’s disease that we had systematically identified for the MDSGene project (www.mdsgene.org). MDSGene is a database including individual-level data on subjects with genetic causes for movement disorders that have been extracted from publications available in English. Unfortunately, with this approach, we likely missed centers that could have been included, as they may have published in languages other than English.

We strongly agree that the lack of centers with underrepresented populations is currently a limitation of this project. In order to further expand the network and to actively include underrepresented populations, this project is currently being integrated into the Global Parkinson’s Genetic Program (GP2). GP2 specifically focuses on the inclusion of previously underrepresented populations and will consequently make more clinical and research centers visible and global study participants available to the clinical and basic PD research community. We have highlighted this limitation and outlook in the discussion section of our manuscript accordingly.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Christine Klein, MD, FEAN

Attachment

Submitted filename: Rebuttal_PONE_Vollstedt_2023_09_01_CK.pdf

Decision Letter 2

Amina Nasri

14 Sep 2023

Establishing an online resource to facilitate global collaboration and inclusion of underrepresented populations: experience from the MJFF Global Genetic Parkinson’s Disease Project

PONE-D-22-35560R2

Dear Dr. Christine Klein,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Amina Nasri

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Amina Nasri

25 Sep 2023

PONE-D-22-35560R2

Establishing an online resource to facilitate global collaboration and inclusion of underrepresented populations: experience from the MJFF Global Genetic Parkinson’s Disease Project

Dear Dr. Klein:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Amina Nasri

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-35560_reviewer-2.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal_PONE_Vollstedt_2023_04_04_CK_JV.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal_PONE_Vollstedt_2023_09_01_CK.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from https://gp2networkdev.wpengine.com/monogenic-resource-map/.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES