Skip to main content
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) logoLink to Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
editorial
. 2023 Apr 2;62(10):3223–3224. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead136

Fibromyalgia remains the elephant in the clinic room

Gui Tran 1,2,, Andrew Gough 3
PMCID: PMC10547501  PMID: 37004173

The era of DMARDs has transformed the lives of many with inflammatory arthritis. Despite this, rheumatology clinics still have patients with pain and disability. Fibromyalgia is a big contributor, affecting up to 5% of the UK population [1] and substantially more in our patient populations. Approximately one third of patients with RA fail DMARDs and bDMARDs [2]. How many of these patients are receiving/switching biologics because they also have fibromyalgia?

Sadly, patients with fibromyalgia in many rheumatology clinics receive little help, despite clinicians recognizing that it is an important cause of pain/disability [2]. Fibromyalgia remains ’the elephant in the clinic room’.

The first steps in management of fibromyalgia is recognition and diagnosis. The 1990 ACR criteria were based on the number of tender points [3], but fibromyalgia is now thought of as a spectrum termed ‘fibromyalgianess’ [4]. The widespread pain index (WPI) and the fibromyalgia impact score (FIS) are invaluable for screening, being both quick and easy to use in clinic [5].

To diagnose fibromyalgia requires a patient history of ≥3 months of constant widespread pain, poor sleep and fatigue. Patients wake unrefreshed, usually after 2–4 h of broken sleep. They are tender all over their body and often flinch when joints are touched. In RA, a high tender joint count with no swollen joints needs to trigger a WPI and FIS. By contrast, patients with CFS sleep for hours (often >10), without tender points or pain. Although it seems counterintuitive that patients could have both conditions, this is not uniformly accepted [6].

The tender points in the ACR 1990 criteria require firm pressure (4 kg via thumbs). If this induces wincing when applied over the trapezius and shins it suggests fibromyalgia. If the WPI is positive (>11/19), then a FIS is the next step [7]. WPI/FIS takes 1–2 min for patients to complete, and a min for a clinician to calculate. The FIS is invaluable to monitor a patient’s progress once treatment for fibromyalgia has started.

The cornerstone of fibromyalgia management is explaining the condition to the patient. Patients score pain higher than those with cancer or arthritis [2] and, despite looking well, invariably feel terrible. Furthermore, routine clinic tests are usually normal, which is why acknowledging how bad patients feel and an explanation is so important.

Sleep assessment is crucial and needs a detailed history, including: when they go to bed; how long before they sleep; when they first wake, how often and for how long. It takes 1–2 h to get into deep restorative sleep, so most patients have little or none of this. A smartwatch or similar gadget will generally indicate <1 h restorative or deep sleep per night.

When poor sleep patterns persist, the brain begins to malfunction in different ways. This is likened to failing to recharge a rechargeable battery. Short-term memory loss is frequent, and elderly patients often believe they have dementia. Patients, for example, forget why they enter rooms at home, or lose their train of thought. Many patients describe this as ‘brain fog’.

As the brain controls organ systems, these too can be affected: patients usually describe bloating, wind and pain [8]. Bladder control is often affected with urgency/frequency. Chest tightness, TMJ is common, as are temporomandibular joint pain and headaches are common. Autonomic system malfunction is frequent, with some patients displaying features of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.

Consequently, many patients living with fibromyalgia may undergo multiple investigations including endoscopies and scans, with huge healthcare resource implications. These multiple investigations with normal results cause further frustration for patients, who cannot understand how they can feel so bad when ‘nothing shows up’.

Sensory inputs to the brain appear to become dysregulated. The ‘dampening’ mechanism in the thalamus to ‘protect’ the cortex from overload appears less effective. Light perception becomes too bright and uncomfortable, which may explain the ‘tinted spectacles sign’. Sound becomes accentuated, so the TV has to be turned down. Strongly flavoured food and smells change. Sensory input from touch is amplified, so resulting in the characteristic widespread tenderness.

Patients with mild lumbar spondylosis can find their back pain unmanageable, leading to unremarkable scans or, worse still, abnormalities which may take patients down a surgical route. Understanding that these symptoms can be linked, why they experience these indicators, and why their tests are unhelpful is important.

Improving sleep patterns, and regaining restorative sleep, is crucial for improvement. We do not know if increasing deep sleep (stage 4) or REM sleep (stage 2), or both, in recovery is important; this remains unknown. What is clear is that without improving sleep quality and reducing fatigue, patients cannot be expected to progress any exercise program.

First, ensure patients have proper sleep hygiene, then consider over-the-counter sleep remedies (e.g. diphenhydramine) and sleep apps. Cognitive behavioural therapy (if available) may be important.

If the above measures lead to no improvement in sleep quality, prescription medication is the next step. For those with concordant depression, using antidepressants that improve sleep makes sense. Mirtazapine or trazodone taken in the late evening is often helpful. For others, low-dose tricyclics in the evening and titrating up to improve sleep may help. Morning doses of fluoxetine or duloxetine are further considerations in some patients, as there is some evidence of synergy [9].

Once patients have 6–8 h unbroken sleep, and fatigue improves, they may start a progressive exercise program. Without adequate sleep, fatigue prevents progress. Fibromyalgia classes where patients meet and exercise together can help and also prevent them feeling isolated. Hydrotherapy appears beneficial, but exercise in any form needs to be every 48–72 h if aerobic fitness is to improve.

Over 6–12 months as fitness steadily increases, patients’ sleep quality can improve, and evening medication may be reduced/withdrawn. With natural sleep rhythms returning, brain function can recover, with return of memory and other organ functions.

Rheumatologists can look back on the past two decades with satisfaction, having improved care of patients with autoimmune diseases. Managing patients with fibromyalgia whose FIS drops from over 80 to under 20 might garner even more satisfaction for clinicians, as this improved score may reflect treatment success.

Acknowledgements

We have greatly appreciated helpful discussion and advice from Dr Kate Jones, Consultant in sleep medicine at the York Sleep Centre, and Dr Richard Davey, Consultant Neurologist at Harrogate District Hospital.

Contributor Information

Gui Tran, Department of Rheumatology, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK; Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Andrew Gough, Department of Rheumatology, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK.

Data availability

There are no new data associated with this article.

Funding

G.T. is Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund Early Career Research Fellow.

Disclosure statement: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1. Jones GT, Atzeni F, Beasley M. et al. The prevalence of fibromyalgia in the general population: a comparison of the American College of Rheumatology 1990, 2010, and modified 2010 classification criteria. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:568–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hoffman DL, Dukes EM.. The health status burden of people with fibromyalgia: a review of studies that assessed health status with the SF-36 or the SF-12. Int J Clin Pract 2008;62:115–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB. et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. report of the multicenter criteria committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:160–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA. et al. 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2016;46:319–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA. et al. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2011;38:1113–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Natelson BH. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia: definitions, similarities, and differences. Clin Ther 2019;41:612–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Salaffi F, Franchignoni F, Giordano A. et al. Psychometric characteristics of the Italian version of the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire using classical test theory and Rasch analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2013;31(6 Suppl 79):S41–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Yang TY, Chen CS, Lin CL. et al. Risk for irritable bowel syndrome in fibromyalgia patients: a national database study. Medicine 2017;96:e6657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Goldenberg D, Mayskiy M, Mossey C, Ruthazer R, Schmid C.. A randomized, double-blind crossover trial of fluoxetine and amitriptyline in the treatment of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:1852–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

There are no new data associated with this article.


Articles from Rheumatology (Oxford, England) are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES