Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1992 Jun;1(2):89–93. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.2.89

Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures.

R Fitzpatrick 1, S Ziebland 1, C Jenkinson 1, A Mowat 1, A Mowat 1
PMCID: PMC1054970  PMID: 10136848

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess the sensitivity to change over time of four health status instruments in relation to patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN--Observational three month study of four self assessed instruments (arthritis impact measurement scales (AIMS), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), Nottingham health profile (NHP), functional limitations profile (FLP)). SETTING--One rheumatology unit. PATIENTS--101 patients with definite or classic rheumatoid arthritis. MAIN MEASURES--Change scores for dimensions of instruments, as determined by effect size (mean change in score/baseline standard deviation of variable) and conventional rheumatological measures, at baseline and after three months. RESULTS--Change scores for comparable dimensions (mobility, activities of daily living, household, pain, mood or emotion, and social scales) of the instruments were compared among 30 patients who considered their health status to have improved over three months. For all dimensions of health status the magnitude of change varied considerably according to the instrument. Maximum range in effect size was for social scales (AIMS 0.06, NHP 0.24, FLP 0.60). No single instrument seemed consistently to show the most change over all dimensions. CONCLUSION--Selection of health status instruments for audit or evaluation may have a considerable impact on the pattern of results obtained, and the "responsiveness" of such scales should be as carefully examined as their reliability and acceptability when selecting outcome measures.

Full text

PDF
89

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahlmen M., Sullivan M., Bjelle A. Team versus non-team outpatient care in rheumatoid arthritis. A comprehensive outcome evaluation including an overall health measure. Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Apr;31(4):471–479. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson J. J., Firschein H. E., Meenan R. F. Sensitivity of a health status measure to short-term clinical changes in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Jul;32(7):844–850. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bombardier C., Ware J., Russell I. J., Larson M., Chalmers A., Read J. L. Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a multicenter trial. Am J Med. 1986 Oct;81(4):565–578. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90539-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown J. H., Kazis L. E., Spitz P. W., Gertman P., Fries J. F., Meenan R. F. The dimensions of health outcomes: a cross-validated examination of health status measurement. Am J Public Health. 1984 Feb;74(2):159–161. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.2.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deyo R. A., Centor R. M. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(11):897–906. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90038-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Deyo R. A., Patrick D. L. Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S254–S268. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deyo R. A. The quality of life, research, and care. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 15;114(8):695–697. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-8-695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Donaldson L. J. Longitudinal changes in functional capacity among surviving old people continuously resident in hospitals and homes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1984 Sep;38(3):240–246. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.3.240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellwood P. M. Shattuck lecture--outcomes management. A technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jun 9;318(23):1549–1556. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198806093182327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fitzpatrick R., Newman S., Lamb R., Shipley M. A comparison of measures of health status in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1989 Jun;28(3):201–206. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/28.3.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fries J. F., Spitz P. W., Young D. Y. The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol. 1982 Sep-Oct;9(5):789–793. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guccione A. A., Jette A. M. Multidimensional assessment of functional limitations in patients with arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 1990 Mar;3(1):44–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guyatt G., Walter S., Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):171–178. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hunt S. M., McEwen J., McKenna S. P. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 Apr;35(273):185–188. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hunt S. M., McKenna S. P., McEwen J., Williams J., Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med A. 1981 May;15(3 Pt 1):221–229. doi: 10.1016/0271-7123(81)90005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. KATZ S., FORD A. B., MOSKOWITZ R. W., JACKSON B. A., JAFFE M. W. STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914–919. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kazis L. E., Anderson J. J., Meenan R. F. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S178–S189. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leigh J. P., Fries J. F. Mortality predictors among 263 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1991 Sep;18(9):1307–1312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liang M. H., Fossel A. H., Larson M. G. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990 Jul;28(7):632–642. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199007000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liang M. H., Larson M. G., Cullen K. E., Schwartz J. A. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum. 1985 May;28(5):542–547. doi: 10.1002/art.1780280513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MAHONEY F. I., BARTHEL D. W. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. MacKenzie C. R., Charlson M. E., DiGioia D., Kelley K. Can the Sickness Impact Profile measure change? An example of scale assessment. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(6):429–438. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90110-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meenan R. F., Anderson J. J., Kazis L. E., Egger M. J., Altz-Smith M., Samuelson C. O., Jr, Willkens R. F., Solsky M. A., Hayes S. P., Blocka K. L. Outcome assessment in clinical trials. Evidence for the sensitivity of a health status measure. Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Dec;27(12):1344–1352. doi: 10.1002/art.1780271204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meenan R. F., Gertman P. M., Mason J. H. Measuring health status in arthritis. The arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Feb;23(2):146–152. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Meenan R. F., Kazis L. E., Anthony J. M., Wallin B. A. The clinical and health status of patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Jun;34(6):761–765. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peck J. R., Smith T. W., Ward J. R., Milano R. Disability and depression in rheumatoid arthritis. A multi-trait, multi-method investigation. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Sep;32(9):1100–1106. doi: 10.1002/anr.1780320908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pincus T., Callahan L. F., Brooks R. H., Fuchs H. A., Olsen N. J., Kaye J. J. Self-report questionnaire scores in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional physical, radiographic, and laboratory measures. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Feb 15;110(4):259–266. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-4-259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sullivan M., Ahlmén M., Bjelle A. Health status assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. I. Further work on the validity of the sickness impact profile. J Rheumatol. 1990 Apr;17(4):439–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tarlov A. R., Ware J. E., Jr, Greenfield S., Nelson E. C., Perrin E., Zubkoff M. The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA. 1989 Aug 18;262(7):925–930. doi: 10.1001/jama.262.7.925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tugwell P., Bombardier C., Buchanan W. W., Goldsmith C., Grace E., Bennett K. J., Williams H. J., Egger M., Alarcon G. S., Guttadauria M. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Impact on quality of life assessed by traditional standard-item and individualized patient preference health status questionnaires. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Jan;150(1):59–62. doi: 10.1001/archinte.150.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Williams H. J. Methods of clinical measurement. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1990 Apr;2(2):309–315. doi: 10.1097/00002281-199002020-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wolfe F., Cathey M. A. The assessment and prediction of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1991 Sep;18(9):1298–1306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wolfe F., Pincus T. Standard self-report questionnaires in routine clinical and research practice--an opportunity for patients and rheumatologists. J Rheumatol. 1991 May;18(5):643–646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES