Abstract
Background
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)‐A‐mediated angiogenesis participates in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, thus inviting the hypothesis that anti‐VEGF‐A therapy could be beneficial in psoriasis. While anti‐angiogenic agents are used in oncology and ophthalmology, these therapeutic strategies remain unexplored for the management of psoriasis.
Objective
Our objective was to investigate ex vivo how VEGF‐A blockade impacts blood vessels, epidermis and immune cells in organ‐cultured plaque and non‐lesional skin from patients with psoriasis.
Methods
Skin biopsies from patients with psoriasis (n = 6; plaque and non‐lesional skin) and healthy controls (n = 6) were incubated with anti‐VEGF‐A monoclonal antibody (bevacizumab, Avastin®) or a human IgG1 isotype control for 72‐h in serum‐free organ culture. CD31/LYVE‐1, Ki‐67, and mast cell tryptase expression were assessed by quantitative immunohistomorphometry. VEGF‐A levels in plasma, PBMCs and skin culture supernatants were measured.
Results
Inhibition of VEGF‐A blocked all free VEGF‐A ex vivo, reduced blood vessel area and the number of blood vessel endothelial cells in plaques of psoriasis (*p < 0.05). The treatment effect correlated significantly with levels of VEGF‐A in organ culture supernatants (r = 0.94; *p < 0.05) from plaque skin and with plasma levels of VEGF‐A from patients with psoriasis (r = 0.943; *p = 0.017).
Conclusions
These ex vivo data are the first studies to objectively investigate the potential of VEGF‐A inhibition as a novel adjuvant treatment strategy for psoriasis. Taken together, our data encourage further investigation by clinical trial to explore whether downregulating pathological angiogenesis has clinical utility, especially in patients with severe psoriasis or those with elevated levels of VEGF‐A in plasma and/or skin.
We report that vascular endothelial growth factor‐A (VEGF‐A) inhibition downregulates inflammatory angiogenesis in psoriasis plaque skin ex vivo. Our data suggest that anti‐angiogenic agents, which are used in oncology and ophthalmology, could be repurposed and integrated into the management of patients with psoriasis. We also explore whether patients with severe psoriasis and/or high levels of VEGF‐A in skin/plasma could benefit most from VEGF‐A blocking therapy.

What is already known about this topic?
Vascular endothelial growth factor‐A (VEGF‐A)‐ mediated angiogenesis participates in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.
What does this study add?
Vascular endothelial growth factor‐A (VEGF‐A) inhibition downregulates blood vessel area in psoriasis plaque skin ex vivo.
Downregulation of blood vessel area is more abrupt in patients with high levels of VEGF‐A and severe disease.
What is the translational message?
This raises the question whether patients with severe psoriasis and/or high levels of VEGF‐A in skin/plasma could benefit most from VEGF‐A blocking therapy.
1. INTRODUCTION
Psoriasis is an immune‐mediated disease, 1 affecting 2%–4% of the world's population. 2 It is associated with reduced quality of life 3 and a higher risk of comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, 4 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. 5 , 6 Aberrant angiogenesis, a feature of the disease pathology, plays a more important role in psoriasis pathogenesis than is widely appreciated. 7 , 8 , 9 Vascular abnormalities precede epidermal hyperplasia in the development of lesions of psoriasis 10 , 11 and the clearance of lesions of psoriasis during therapy is accompanied by vascular normalisation. 12 Vascular abnormalities are macroscopically visible and represent the Auspitz phenomenon, a characteristic feature of psoriasis. 13
Cutaneous angiogenesis in patients with psoriasis is characterised by pronounced vascular dilation and elongation, in conjunction with enhanced vascular permeability. 14 , 15 Vascular endothelial growth factor‐A (VEGF‐A), a potent pro‐angiogenic cytokine, is highly expressed in the skin and plasma of patients with psoriasis, 16 , 17 promoting endothelial cell (EC) proliferation, migration, survival, increased vasodilation and permeability 9 , 18 ; as well as keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation. 19 , 20 Two common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the VEGF‐A gene, at −460 (rs833061) and +405 (rs2010963), determine VEGF‐A production, both in health and disease. 21 , 22 Moreover, individuals who are ‘high VEGF‐A producers’, are significantly more likely to develop psoriasis and to manifest a severe psoriasis phenotype. 21
Despite preclinical evidence 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 and substantial evidence from case reports of resolution of psoriasis whilst on treatment with anti‐VEGF‐A therapies, 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 the effects of VEGF‐A inhibition remain unexplored in psoriasis, thus raising the question of whether anti‐VEGF‐A therapy could be integrated into psoriasis management by repurposing licenced anti‐VEGF‐A biologicals. Therefore, we postulated that VEGF‐A inhibition represents a novel adjuvant treatment strategy for psoriasis, particularly in patients who are ‘high VEGF‐A producers’. 36
We interrogated this hypothesis by exposing organ‐cultured plaque and non‐lesional psoriatic skin to treatment with bevacizumab (Avastin®, Roche, Basel, Switzerland), a humanised monoclonal antibody against VEGF‐A or isotype control IgG1 ex vivo. 15 , 37 The effects of bevacizumab ex vivo were assessed by quantitative immunohistomorphometry on blood vessels using double immunofluorescence staining CD31/LYVE‐1 (CD31 is an endothelial cell marker and LYVE‐1 is a lymphatic‐specific endothelial cell marker) to visualise the blood capillary network (CD31+LYVE‐1‐). 38 , 39 The effects of VEGF‐A inhibition in the epidermis were assessed using the proliferation marker Ki‐67 and measuring keratin 6 expression, which is upregulated in psoriatic epidermis. 40 Lastly, we quantified the levels of mast cell activation, which contributes to psoriasis pathogenesis and constitutes an important source of VEGF‐A 20 , 41 , 42 ; and key immune mediators in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, CD4+ and CD8+ cells. This showed reduced blood vessel area and EC numbers in plaques of psoriasis following VEGF‐A inhibition, which was especially pronounced in patients with high VEGF‐A levels in plasma and/or in organ culture supernatant, thus supporting our working hypothesis.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Volunteers
Twelve individuals (6 with psoriasis and 6 without psoriasis) were recruited. Potential participants were excluded if they had used topical treatment on the biopsied area within 4 weeks or systemic treatments within 12 weeks of enrolment in the study; or had inflammatory arthropathy. The study was approved by the UK Health Research Authority (15/NW/0585, 09/H/101143) and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki Guidelines. All subjects gave written, informed consent.
2.2. Skin sampling
Skin punch biopsies (3 mm) were collected from all donors. Those with psoriasis had two biopsies taken from plaques of psoriasis and two additional biopsies from non‐lesional skin (at least 5 cm away from plaques). Anatomical site‐to‐site variations were minimised by biopsy of the same body site (buttock). A detailed description of skin sampling is provided in Supplementary Files S1.
2.3. Human skin organ culture
Skin biopsies were incubated at an air‐liquid interface in 1 mL of supplemented EpiLife media (MEPI500CA, Gibco, ThermoFisher Scientific) for 72 h. To stimulate T cells and restore their inflammatory activity in skin organ culture, a T‐cell activation mix containing 1 μg/ml anti‐CD3 (clone ICHT1, cat: MAB100), 1 μg/ml anti‐CD28 (clone 37407, Cat: MAB342) and 50 ng/mL rh IL‐23 (Cat:1290‐IL; all from R&D Systems, Bio‐techne, Minnesota, USA) was added to the culture as previously described. 43 A detailed description of skin organ culture and treatment is provided in Supplementary Files S1. Concentration of bevacizumab and duration of culture was iterated from our optimising study as previously described. 44 Biopsies were incubated with 0.8 mg/mL of bevacizumab or 0.8 mg/mL of IgG1 isotype control (BioXCell, 2BScientific Ltd, Oxford, UK) for 72 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Culture media was changed after 48 h. After 72 h, biopsies were embedded in optimal cutting temperature gel, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until cryosectioning.
2.4. Histochemistry, immunofluorescence and quantitative immunohistomorphometry
Cryosections (8‐μm) were affixed to Superfrost Plus slides (Menzel‐Glaser, ThermoFisher Scientific). Immunofluorescence staining included: mouse anti‐CD31 (clone JC/70A, M0823, DAKO, 1:100); rabbit anti‐LYVE‐1 (ab10278, abcam, 1:100); rabbit anti‐Ki‐67 (ab16667, abcam, 1:50); mouse anti‐keratin 6 (ab18586, abcam, 1:200), mouse anti‐mast cell tryptase (ab2378, abcam, 1:500), mouse anti‐CD4 (clone 4B12, MA5‐12259, ThermoFisher, 1:50) and mouse anti‐CD8 (MA5‐144B, ThermoFisher, 1:100). DAPI was used to stain nuclei. Secondary antibodies used were goat anti‐rabbit 488 Alexa fluor (AF; 1:200), goat anti‐mouse 594 AF (1:200), goat anti‐mouse 488 Alexa fluor (1:200) and goat anti‐rabbit 594 AF (1:200). After staining, slides were mounted using Fluoromount mounting medium (S3023, Dako) and were visualised and photographed using a Keyence Biozero 8000 (Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan) or 3D Histec Pannoramic250 Slide scanner (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Quantitative analysis was performed on QuPath v0.1.2 or ImageJ (Fiji). Morphometric analysis of blood vessel area, defined as the dermis area superficial to the deep vascular plexus (i.e., superficial vascular plexus and the capillary loop system) occupied by the blood vessels, was performed on ImageJ (Fiji) as previously described. 44 A detailed description of immunofluorescence and quantitative histochemical analysis is provided in Supplementary Files S1.
2.5. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells culture
Venous blood was collected into EDTA‐tubes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated using density gradient media – Lymphoprep ™ (STEMCELL Technologies Ltd, Cambridge, UK). Cells were incubated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS; L4391, Sigma‐Aldrich Inc, Munich, Germany) at 1 ng/mL or 5 ng/mL, as previously described. 45 Cell culture supernatant were harvested and stored at −20°C before VEGF‐A assay. A detailed description of PBMC culture is provided in Supplementary Files S1.
2.6. Quantification of VEGF‐A levels
Levels of VEGF‐A protein in PBMCs culture supernatant and in organ culture supernatant were measured using an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Duo set ELISA kit, R&D Systems Europe Ltd., Abingdon, UK). Plasma was separated from a portion of venous blood. A detailed description of plasma extraction is provided in Supplementary Files S1. Levels of VEGF‐A in plasma were measured using an ELISA (Quantikine ELISA, R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK) designed to assay both VEGF‐A165 and VEGF‐A121 isoforms. Optical density was determined using a microplate reader (CLARIOstar® plus, BMGLabtech).
2.7. DNA extraction and genotyping
Genomic DNA was isolated using QIAamp DNA blood midi kit (QIAGEN®, Crawley, UK). Genotyping of the −460 (rs833061) and +405 (rs2010963) VEGF‐A SNPs 15 , 16 , 37 was performed using the SNP genotyping assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City). A detailed description of DNA extraction and genotyping is provided in Supplementary Files S1.
2.8. Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism v8.1.2. Non‐normal distribution was assumed for continuous variables and results reported as median (interquartile range [IQR]), unless otherwise specified. The Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test was used to evaluate differences between control and treated samples for healthy, non‐lesional and plaque skin. Independent two‐sided t or Mann‐Whitney U tests were used to compare continuous variables between both groups. All tests were two‐sided and *p‐value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Non‐parametric Spearman's correlation was used to determine relationships between variables.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Inhibition of VEGF‐A with bevacizumab blocks free VEGF‐A in organ culture
Skin samples were taken from 5 women and 1 man with psoriasis, with median age of 46.5 years (inter‐quartile range ([IQR] 27.75), median age of psoriasis onset 24 years (IQR 17) and median PASI (psoriasis area and severity index) of 12.65 (IQR 9.8). 50% (n = 3) had a family history of psoriasis. Skin samples were taken from 6 healthy controls with median age of 42.5 years (IQR 14.5; Table 1). Psoriasis plaque skin maintained its psoriatic phenotype ex vivo, including increased rete ridge length, epidermal area, epidermal hyperproliferation and keratin 6 expression compared to non‐lesional and healthy skin (Figure S1).
TABLE 1.
Demographic details and clinical characteristics of donors.
| Patients with psoriasis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volunteer ID | PS1 | PS2 | PS3 | PS4 | PS5 | PS6 | Median (IQR) |
| Sex | F | F | F | F | F | M | |
| Age (years) | 42 | 51 | 57 | 61 | 28 | 31 | 46.5 (27.75) |
| Age of onset | 11 | 24 | 24 | 58 | 19 | 26 | 24 (17) |
| Disease duration | 31 | 28 | 33 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 18.5 (27) |
| Family history | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | |
| Severity | 10/10 | 8/10 | 3/10 | 3/10 | 5/10 | 5/10 | 5 (5.5) |
| PASI | 16 | 21.8 | 6.6 | 8.5 | 9.3 | 16.5 | 12.65 (9.8) |
| PEST | 4/5 | 2/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 2 (3.25) |
| DLQI | 25/30 | 5/30 | 10/30 | 14/30 | 13/30 | 25/30 | 13.5 (16.25) |
| Finger nails | Yes (3) | No | No | No | Yes (3) | Yes (10) | 1.5 (4.75) |
| Toe nails | Yes (3) | Yes (10) | No | No | Yes (2) | Yes (1) | 1.5 (4.75) |
| Height (m) | 1.72 | 1.67 | 1.69 | 1.55 | 1.72 | 1.88 | 1.7 (0.12) |
| Weight (kg) | 101.4 | 119 | 85.4 | 78.4 | 111.1 | 136.2 | 106.3 (39.65) |
| BMI | 34.2 | 42.6 | 29.9 | 32.6 | 37.5 | 38.5 | 35.91 (7.62) |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 116 | 129 | 177 | 131 | 136 | 128 | 130.5 (21.3) |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 77 | 84 | 107 | 82 | 80 | 84 | 83 (10.5) |
| VEGF‐A polymorphism | |||||||
| +405 | G/G | C/G | C/C | C/G | G/G | C/G | |
| −460 | C/C | C/T | T/T | T/T | C/C | C/T | |
| VEGF‐A plasma level (pg/ml) | 67.2 | 27.6 | 13 | 23 | 16.4 | 81.4 | 25.3 (55.21) |
| Healthy volunteers | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volunteer ID | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 | Median (IQR) |
| Sex | F | F | M | M | F | F | |
| Age | 38 | 49 | 46 | 39 | 54 | 29 | 42.5 (14.5) |
| Height (m) | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.82 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.68 (0.18) |
| Weight (kg) | 102.4 | 92 | 121.8 | 96.3 | 66.6 | 65 | 96.3 (32.8) |
| BMI | 39 | 33.8 | 36.7 | 29.4 | 23.6 | 23.3 | 33.79 (11.39) |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 110 | 138 | 126 | 124 | 98 | 119 | 124 (22) |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 80 | 78 | 100 | 86 | 68 | 77 | 80 (14.75) |
| VEGF‐A polymorphism | |||||||
| +405 | G/G | N/A | C/C | G/G | G/G | G/G | |
| −460 | C/T | N/A | T/T | C/C | C/C | C/T | |
| VEGF‐A plasma level (pg/ml) | 2.6 | 38.5 | 71 | 3 | 14.7 | 13.5 | 14.13 (43.65) |
Note: Values are expressed as median (range).
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; H, healthy; IQR, interquartile range (25th‐75th percentiles); N/A, Not available; PASI, Psoriasis Area Severity Index; PEST, Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool; PS, Psoriasis; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
First, we investigated whether bevacizumab effectively blocked VEGF‐A, showing that VEGF‐A was undetectable at 12 and 48 h in culture supernatant of healthy, non‐lesional and plaque skin incubated with 0.8 mg/mL of bevacizumab (Figure 1a,b). At 12 h, there were significantly higher levels of VEGF‐A in culture media of isotype‐control treated plaque compared to isotype control‐treated non‐lesional (**p < 0.01) and healthy skin (**p < 0.01, Figure 1a). Therefore, bevacizumab effectively blocks free VEGF‐A in human skin organ culture.
FIGURE 1.

Bevacizumab blocks free VEGF‐A in organ culture. VEGF‐A levels were measured in culture supernatant of organ‐cultured healthy, non‐lesional and plaque skin after 12 and 48 h using an ELISA. VEGF‐A was undetectable in organ culture supernatant of healthy, non‐lesional and psoriasis plaque skin 12 and 48 h after incubation with bevacizumab. (a) At 12 h, the levels of VEGF‐A in organ culture supernatant of isotype control‐treated plaque were higher than those of isotype control‐treated non‐lesional (**p < 0.01) and isotype control‐treated healthy skin (**p < 0.01). (b) At 48 h, the levels of VEGF‐A in organ culture supernatant of isotype control‐treated non‐lesional skin (1726 [320]) were higher than those of isotype control‐treated plaque (1338 [779.3]; *p < 0.05). Number of independent experiments n = 36 (1 punch biopsy per patient and per treatment group). Data were presented as median and were analysed with two‐tailed Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed rank test (paired analysis) or two‐tailed Mann Whitney test (unpaired analysis). CTR, isotype control; H, healthy; NL, non‐lesional; PLQ, plaque; T, treated with anti‐VEGF‐A monoclonal antibody.
3.2. VEGF‐A inhibition downregulates angiogenesis in plaques of psoriasis
Next, we asked whether VEGF‐A inhibition downregulates angiogenesis in skin organ culture using CD31/LYVE‐1 staining (Figure 2a). Blood vessel area, defined as the dermis area distal to the deep vascular plexus occupied by CD31+LYVE‐1‐ blood vessels, was significantly higher in isotype control‐treated plaque (6 [3.78]) compared to isotype control‐treated non‐lesional (1.52 [0.43]; **p < 0.01) and isotype control‐treated healthy skin (1.13 [1.15]; **p < 0.01; Figure 2b). After 3 days of anti‐VEGF‐A treatment ex vivo, the blood vessel area in bevacizumab‐treated, organ‐cultured plaque was significantly lower (3.54 [1.53]) than in isotype control‐treated plaque (6 [3.78]; *p < 0.05; Figure 2b).
FIGURE 2.

VEGF‐A blockade decreased blood vessel area and the number of blood endothelial cells in psoriasis plaque skin (a) Blood vessel area was assessed using double immunofluorescence stain CD31 (red)/LYVE‐1 (green). DAPI stained the nuclei. (b) Blood vessel area was higher in isotype control‐treated plaque (6 [3.78]) compared to isotype control‐treated non‐lesional (1.52 [0.43]; **p < 0.01) and isotype control‐treated healthy (1.13 [1.15]; **p < 0.01). (c) The number of blood endothelial cells (ECs) was higher in isotype control‐treated plaque (116.2 [84.45]) compared to isotype control‐treated non‐lesional (44.97 [27.9]; **p < 0.01) and isotype control‐treated healthy (55.8 [34.34]; p < 0.01). Bevacizumab decreased (a) blood vessel area (3.54 [1.53]; p < 0.05) and (b) the number of CD31+LYVE‐1‐ ECs (79.1 [50.72]; *p < 0.05) in plaques of psoriasis. Number of independent experiments n = 36 (1 punch biopsy per patient and per treatment group). Data were presented as median and were analysed with two‐tailed Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed rank test (paired analysis) or two‐tailed Mann Whitney test (unpaired analysis). Scale bars = 100 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. CTR, isotype control; H, healthy; NL, non‐lesional; PLQ, plaque; T, treated with anti‐VEGF‐A monoclonal antibody.
As expected from the literature, 46 , 47 , 48 the number of CD31+LYVE‐1‐ ECs in the dermis distal to the deep vascular plexus was significantly higher in isotype control‐treated plaque (116.2 [84.45]) compared to isotype control‐treated non‐lesional (44.97 [27.9]; **p < 0.01) and isotype control‐treated healthy skin (55.8 [34.34]; **p < 0.01; Figure 2c). After bevacizumab treatment, the number of ECs in plaques declined significantly (79.1 [50.72]), below that of isotype control‐treated plaques (116.2 [84.45]; *p < 0.05; Figure 2c). These data demonstrate that short‐term anti‐VEGF‐A therapy downregulates angiogenesis in plaques of psoriasis ex vivo.
3.3. VEGF‐A inhibition does not significantly change epidermal read‐out parameters
We assessed the effects of bevacizumab on the epidermis, finding that VEGF‐A inhibition did not affect rete ridge length, epidermal length, epidermal area or keratin 6 expression in plaques ex vivo (Figure S1). After 3 days organ culture, the number of proliferating keratinocytes in the stratum basale (SB) was significantly higher in isotype control‐treated plaque (16.74 [21.79]) compared to isotype control‐treated non‐lesional (0 [0.61]; **p < 0.01) and isotype control‐treated healthy skin (0.68 [1.25]; **p < 0.01; Figure 3a,b). VEGF‐A inhibition did not affect TUNEL expression in the epidermal SB (Figure S1). This suggests that short‐term anti‐VEGF‐A therapy hardly impacts on key epidermal parameters, at least ex vivo.
FIGURE 3.

VEGF‐A inhibition does not affect epidermal proliferation in psoriasis plaque skin ex vivo (a) Proliferation was assessed using double immunofluorescence staining CD31 (red)/Ki‐67 (green) in the stratum basale (SB). DAPI stained the nuclei. (b) Proliferation in the SB was higher in isotype control‐treated plaques (16.74 [21.79]) than in isotype control‐treated non‐lesional (0 [0.61); **p < 0.01) and isotype control‐treated healthy skin (0.37 [1.76]; **p < 0.01). Number of independent experiments n = 36 (1 punch biopsy per patient and per treatment group). Data were presented as median and were analysed with two‐tailed Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed rank test (paired analysis) or two‐tailed Mann Whitney test (unpaired analysis). Scale bars = 100 μm. **p < 0.01. CTR, isotype control; H, healthy; NL, non‐lesional; PLQ, plaque; T, treated with anti‐VEGF‐A monoclonal antibody.
3.4. VEGF‐A inhibition does not significantly change the number of tryptase+‐mast cells, CD4+ or CD8+ T‐cells in plaques of psoriasis
We also investigated ex vivo the impact of VEGF‐A inhibition on T‐cell localisation and dermal mast cells (MCs). The number of tryptase+‐MCs (mast cell tryptase+ DAPI+) was significantly higher in isotype control‐treated plaque (15.92 [15.47]) compared to isotype control‐treated non‐lesional (7.81 [9.9]; *p < 0.05) and isotype control‐treated healthy skin (5.67 [7.01]; *p < 0.05; Figure S2.
The number of CD4+ T‐cells was significantly higher in the dermis (33.71 [20.9]) and epidermis (1.67 [2.85]) of isotype control‐treated plaque compared to the dermis (8.43 [0.86]; **p < 0.01) and epidermis (0; **p < 0.01) of isotype control‐treated non‐lesional skin, respectively. The number of CD8+ T‐cells was significantly higher in the dermis of isotype control‐treated plaque (19.28 [9.86]) compared to the dermis of isotype control‐treated non‐lesional skin (3.66 [3.73]; **p < 0.01; Figures S3 and S4). Although the number of tryptase+‐MCs increased in bevacizumab‐treated plaque (24.81 [25.37]) compared to isotype control‐treated plaque (15.92 [15.47]), this did not reach significance (p = 0.15, Figure S2). VEGF‐A inhibition also did not significantly alter the number of CD4+ or CD8+ cells in the dermis or epidermis (Figure S3 and S4).
3.5. Anti‐angiogenic response to bevacizumab correlates with levels of VEGF‐A in the plasma and plaque skin
Finally, we asked whether differences in the anti‐angiogenic response to VEGF‐A inhibition were determined by levels of VEGF‐A in plasma or skin, disease severity, VEGF‐A polymorphisms or PBMC production of VEGF‐A. There were no differences in VEGF‐A genotype frequencies at the +405 or −460 sites between our donors when comparing healthy volunteers with patients with psoriasis or between volunteers with severe psoriasis and volunteers with mild to moderate psoriasis (Tables S1 and S2). Thus, no association between genotype and response to anti‐VEGF‐A treatment could be identified.
The VEGF‐A plasma levels between all patients with psoriasis and healthy volunteers, overall, showed no significant differences (Figure 4a). However, patients with severe disease (PASI>10: n = 3), tended towards exhibiting higher VEGF‐A plasma levels than patients with moderate disease (PASI<10; n = 3), although this did not reach significance (p = 0.1; Figure 4b). VEGF‐A production by PBMCs did not differ between healthy volunteers and psoriasis patients (Figure S5), and VEGF‐A production by PBMCs did not correlate with response to anti‐VEGF‐A treatment (Figure 4c). VEGF‐A plasma levels of patients with psoriasis correlated well with VEGF‐A levels measured in culture supernatant of plaques at 12 h (r = 0.94, *p < 0.05; Figure 4c).
FIGURE 4.

Blood vessel area downregulation correlated with the levels of VEGF‐A in plasma and VEGF‐A production in psoriasis plaque skin (a) The median level of VEGF‐A in plasma of patients with psoriasis and healthy volunteers was 25.38 (range 13–81) pg/ml and 14.13 (3–71) pg/ml, respectively. (b) The levels of VEGF‐A in plasma in volunteers with psoriasis with PASI<10 were not significantly different to those with PASI>10 (p = 0.10). (c) There was a positive correlation between blood vessel area downregulation in plaque skin and VEGF‐A levels in culture supernatant of plaque skin at 12 h (r = 0.89, p < 0.05). Blood vessel area downregulation also correlated positively with VEGF‐A levels in plasma of patients with psoriasis (r = 0.94; p < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between VEGF‐A levels in culture supernatant of plaque skin at 12 h and VEGF‐A levels in plasma of patients with psoriasis (r = 0.94; p < 0.05). Data were analysed using two‐tailed Mann‐Whitney test. Correlations were analysed using Spearman correlation coefficient (r). PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Importantly, we noted a positive correlation between bevacizumab‐induced blood vessel area downregulation in 3‐day organ‐cultured psoriasis plaques ex vivo with the VEGF‐A plasma levels of psoriasis patients (r = 0.94, *p < 0.05; Figure 4c). Bevacizumab‐induced blood vessel area downregulation in plaque also correlated with the levels of VEGF‐A in culture supernatant of isotype control‐treated plaque at 12 h (r = 0.89, *p < 0.05; Figure 4c). Despite the relatively low numbers that could be examined, these ex vivo/in vivo correlations suggest that the anti‐angiogenic response to bevacizumab is greater in those with higher levels of VEGF‐A in the skin and/or plasma.
4. DISCUSSION
In this ex vivo pilot study, we demonstrate that VEGF‐A inhibition by bevacizumab exerts significant anti‐angiogenic activity in plaques of psoriasis. In agreement with previous studies, 16 , 49 patients with severe psoriasis (PASI >10) had higher levels of VEGF‐A in plasma and plaques of psoriasis. Despite the limited number of skin biopsies and donors that were available for study, our preclinical data encourage one to systematically explore clinically whether blocking VEGF‐A is an effective adjunct management strategy for downregulating psoriasis‐associated pathological angiogenesis. We therefore hypothesise that this treatment strategy may be most effective in patients with high levels of VEGF‐A in the skin and/or plasma.
The ability of VEGF‐A inhibition to downregulate pathological angiogenesis has been demonstrated in pre‐clinical studies of cancer and is well established. 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 Bevacizumab, which is currently used to downregulate angiogenesis in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 non‐squamous non‐small cell lung cancer 58 , 59 and hepatic cell carcinoma, 60 is used as a long‐term treatment and is often combined with chemotherapeutic agents. 61 , 62 , 63 To the best of our knowledge, we describe here the first studies to explore a potential therapeutic effect in inflammatory skin disease, demonstrating that VEGF‐A inhibition by bevacizumab exerts significant anti‐angiogenic activity in skin organ culture of psoriasis. Manifest by significant diminution in blood vessel area and blood vessel ECs in plaques of psoriasis, response to bevacizumab was significantly greater in patients with high levels of VEGF‐A in plasma/plaque skin and appeared to offer most treatment benefit to those with severe psoriasis. These preclinical data encourage further exploration of whether downregulation of pathological angiogenesis represents an adjuvant management strategy for patients with psoriasis. Although we observed no histological resolution of psoriasis, this was expected, given the short incubation time (72 h). However, early knockdown of the blood vasculature and prolonged VEGF‐A inhibition could induce downregulation of epidermal hyperplasia due to keratinocyte starvation. While further research is required to test this hypothesis, psoriasis management could be optimised in the future through downregulation of angiogenesis in conjunction with the simultaneous inhibition of key regulatory pathways in psoriasis such as IL‐17/IL‐23.
Long‐term inhibition of VEGF‐A may lead to undesired age‐promoting effects 64 , 65 and, therefore, anti‐VEGF‐A therapy for the management of psoriasis may best be administered as repetitive pulse therapy. In addition, nanotechnology‐based angiogenesis‐targeting strategies could be used to minimise the potential systemic complications associated with tissue ageing effects of blocking VEGF‐A, as these can also lead to renal and cardiovascular impairment. 66 , 67 However, anti‐VEGF‐A therapy could be beneficial for patients with psoriasis through a direct effect on both the disease and its systemic sequelae, 68 , 69 , 70 perhaps reducing the risk of psoriasis‐associated vascular events (myocardial infarction and stroke), and cardio‐metabolic diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome). 71 , 72
We also show that VEGF‐A inhibition increases the number of tryptase+‐MCs in plaques. Since our skin organ cultures had no access to circulating MC progenitors, this could reflect a promoting effect on the differentiation of mature MCs from resident mast cell progenitor cells that we have previously shown to be present in human skin mesenchyme under organ culture conditions. 73 , 74 Tryptase, a major secretory product of human MCs, is a marker of MC activation 75 and a mitogen for dermal ECs, 76 , 77 and the release of pro‐inflammatory and pro‐angiogenic mediators from MCs can decrease the efficacy of anti‐angiogenic therapy in tumours. 78 , 79 Therefore, it deserves further exploration whether the efficacy of an anti‐angiogenic psoriasis management strategy can be further enhanced by combining it with inhibitors of MC degranulation.
A recent prospective cohort study identified a correlation between the degree of nail fold capillary (NFC) changes and the severity of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), suggesting that NFC abnormalities may be an indicator of PsA progression. 80 Anti‐VEGF therapy may not only be effective against psoriasis skin lesions, but may also inhibit the progression to PsA.
The study had limitations. First, a limited number of biopsies and donors were available and further investigations in a larger group of patients are required to identify associations between VEGF‐A genetic signatures and response to treatment. However, our experimental protocol was carefully and uniformly performed from various viewpoints, thus informing future investigations. Second, the ex vivo nature of the study and lack of tissue perfusion prevented investigation of histological changes over a prolonged period of time. Nevertheless, skin organ culture allows instructive study the effects of VEGF‐A inhibition on the vasculature, including all skin compartments and resident skin cells. Finally, skin organ culture may be intrinsically affected by a wound healing response at 48 h, and we observed levels of VEGF‐A increasing, in all groups in keeping with this. 81 However, despite this, bevacizumab effectively blocked all free VEGF‐A in culture supernatant of healthy, non‐lesional and plaque skin ex vivo after 72 h.
In conclusion, this pilot study provides proof‐of‐principle for the investigation of VEGF‐A inhibition as an adjuvant management strategy to selectively target vascular pathology in psoriasis. This approach could be especially beneficial for patients who have high levels of VEGF‐A, offering an opportunity to personalise management and complement current anti‐cytokine strategies and other standard‐of‐care psoriasis therapeutics.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors state no conflict of interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Andrea Luengas‐Martinez: conceptualization (supporting); data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); validation (equal); writing – review & editing (lead); writing – review & editing (lead). Dina Ismail: data curation (supporting); investigation (equal); methodology (supporting); resources (supporting); writing – original draft (supporting); writing – review & editing (supporting). Ralf Paus: conceptualization (supporting); data curation (supporting); formal analysis (supporting); funding acquisition (supporting); investigation (supporting); methodology (supporting); resources (supporting); supervision (supporting); writing – original draft (supporting); writing – review & editing (supporting). Helen S. Young: conceptualization (lead); data curation (supporting); formal analysis (supporting); funding acquisition (lead); investigation (supporting); methodology (lead); project administration (lead); resources (lead); supervision (lead); visualization (lead); writing – original draft (supporting); writing – review & editing (lead).
ETHICS STATEMENT
The study was approved by the UK Health Research Authority (15/NW/0585, 09/H/101143) and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki Guidelines. All subjects gave written, informed consent.
Supporting information
Supporting Information S1
Supporting Information S2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the volunteers who took part in this study. The Bioimaging Facility microscopes used in this study were purchased with grants from BBSRC, Wellcome and the University of Manchester Strategic Fund. Special thanks goes to Steve Marsden for their help with the microscopy. This study was funded by the British Skin Foundation.
Luengas‐Martinez A, Ismail D, Paus R, Young HS. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor‐A downregulates angiogenesis in psoriasis: A pilot study. Skin Health Dis. 2023;3(5):e245. 10.1002/ski2.245
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
REFERENCES
- 1. Armstrong AW, Read C. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of psoriasis: a review. JAMA. 2020;323(19):1945–1960. 10.1001/jama.2020.4006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Pezzolo E, Naldi L. Epidemiology of major chronic inflammatory immune‐related skin diseases in 2019. Expet Rev Clin Immunol. 2020;16(2):155–166. 10.1080/1744666x.2020.1719833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Langley RG, Augustin M, McBride S. 33950 Impact of psoriasis in special areas on patient quality‐of‐life outcomes and depression screening: findings from the multinational UPLIFT survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(3):AB67. 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.303 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Zwain A, Aldiwani M, Taqi H. The association between psoriasis and cardiovascular diseases. Eur Cardiol. 2021;13:16. 10.15420/ecr.2020.15.r2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ferdinando LB, Fukumoto PK, Sanches S, Fabricio LHZ, Skare TL. Metabolic syndrome and psoriasis: a study in 97 patients. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2018;64(4):368–373. 10.1590/1806-9282.64.04.368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Puig L, Reich A, Zaheri S. 32240 Baseline characteristics and comorbid conditions in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis enrolled in the Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(3):AB23. 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.124 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Varricchi G, Granata F, Loffredo S, Genovese A, Marone G. Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in inflammatory skin disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(1):144–153. 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.03.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Griffiths CE, Barker JN. Pathogenesis and clinical features of psoriasis. Lancet. 2007;370(9583):263–271. 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61128-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Luengas‐Martinez A, Hardman‐Smart J, Paus R, Young HS. Vascular endothelial growth factor‐A as a promising therapeutic target for the management of psoriasis. Exp Dermatol. 2020;29(8):687–698. 10.1111/exd.14151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Creamer D, Allen M, Jaggar R, Stevens R, Bicknell R, Barker J. Mediation of systemic vascular hyperpermeability in severe psoriasis by circulating vascular endothelial growth factor. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(6):791–796. 10.1001/archderm.138.6.791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Výbohová D, Adamicová K, Mellová Y, Hešková G. Microvascular changes in relation to inflammation and epidermal hyperplasia in chronic cutaneous lesions of psoriasis vulgaris. Histol Histopathol. 2017;32(5):461–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Braverman IM, Yen A. Ultrastructure of the capillary loops in the dermal pappilae of psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. 1977;68(1):53–60. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12485169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Holubar K, Fatović‐Ferencić S. Papillary tip bleeding or the Auspitz phenomenon: a hero wrongly credited and a misnomer resolved. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(2):263–264. 10.1067/mjd.2003.89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Heidenreich R, Röcken M, Ghoreschi K. Angiogenesis drives psoriasis pathogenesis. Int J Exp Pathol. 2009;90(3):232–248. 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2009.00669.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Folkman J. Angiogenesis. Annu Rev Med. 2006;57(1):1–18. 10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Detmar M, Brown LF, Claffey KP, Yeo KT, Kocher O, Jackman RW, et al. Overexpression of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in psoriasis. J Exp Med. 1994;180(3):1141–1146. 10.1084/jem.180.3.1141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Watanabe A, Kamata M, Shimizu T, Uchida H, Sakurai E, Suzuki S, et al. Serum levels of angiogenesis‐related factors in patients with psoriasis. J Dermatol. 2022;50(2):222–228. 10.1111/1346-8138.16588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ferrara N, Oncology M, Francisco SS. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004;25(4):581–611. 10.1210/er.2003-0027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wilgus TA, Matthies AM, Radek KA, Dovi JV, Burns AL, Shankar R, et al. Novel function for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐1 on epidermal keratinocytes. Am J Pathol. 2005;167(5):1257–1266. 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)61213-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Man XY, Yang XH, Cai SQ, Yao YG, Zheng M. Immunolocalization and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) and neuropilins (NRPs) on keratinocytes in human epidermis. Mol Med. 2006;12(7‐8):127–136. 10.2119/2006-00024.man [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Young HS, Bhushan M, Griffiths CEM, Summers AM, Brenchley PEC. Single‐nucleotide polymorphisms of vascular endothelial growth factor in psoriasis of early onset. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122(1):209–215. 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2003.22107.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Watson CJ, Webb NJA, Bottomley MJ, Brenchley PEC. Identification of polymorphisms within the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene: correlation with variation in VEGF protein production. Cytokine. 2000;12(8):1232–1235. 10.1006/cyto.2000.0692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Xia Y.‐P, Li B, Hylton D, Detmar M, Yancopoulos GD, Rudge JS. Transgenic delivery of VEGF to mouse skin leads to an inflammatory condition resembling human psoriasis. Blood. 2003;102(1):161–168. 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kunstfeld R, Hirakawa S, Hong Y.‐K, Schacht V, Lange‐Asschenfeldt B, Velasco P, et al. Induction of cutaneous delayed‐type hypersensitivity reactions in VEGF‐A transgenic mice results in chronic skin inflammation associated with persistent lymphatic hyperplasia. Blood. 2004;104(4):1048–1057. 10.1182/blood-2003-08-2964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Halin C, Fahrngruber H, Meingassner JG, Bold G, Littlewood‐Evans A, Stuetz A, et al. Inhibition of chronic and acute skin inflammation by treatment with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Am J Pathol. 2008;173(1):265–277. 10.2353/ajpath.2008.071074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Schonthaler HB, Huggenberger R, Wculek SK, Detmar M, Wagner EF. Systemic anti‐VEGF treatment strongly reduces skin inflammation in a mouse model of psoriasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(50):21264–21269. 10.1073/pnas.0907550106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Jung K, Lee D, Lim HS, Lee SI, Kim YJ, Lee GM, et al. Double anti‐angiogenic and anti‐inflammatory protein Valpha targeting VEGF‐A and TNF‐α in retinopathy and psoriasis. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(16):14410–14418. 10.1074/jbc.m111.228130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kuang Y.‐H, Lu Y, Liu Y.‐K, Liao L.‐Q, Zhou X.‐C, Qin Q.‐S, et al. Topical Sunitinib ointment alleviates Psoriasis‐like inflammation by inhibiting the proliferation and apoptosis of keratinocytes. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018;824:57–63. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.01.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Datta‐Mitra A, Riar NK, Raychaudhuri SP. Remission of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis during bevacizumab therapy for renal cell cancer. Indian J Dermatol. 2014;59(6):632. 10.4103/0019-5154.143574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Akman A, Yilmaz E, Mutlu H, Ozdogan M. Complete remission of psoriasis following bevacizumab therapy for colon cancer. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34(5):e202–e204. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.02991.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Fournier C, Tisman G. Sorafenib‐associated remission of psoriasis in hypernephroma: case report. Dermatol Online J. 2010;16(2). 10.5070/d32z47h80w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Antoniou EA, Koutsounas I, Damaskos C, Koutsounas S. Remission of psoriasis in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. In Vivo. 2016;30(5):677–680. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. van Kester MS, Luelmo SAC, Vermeer MH, Blank C, van Doorn R. Remission of psoriasis during treatment with sorafenib. JAAD case reports. 2018;4(10):1065–1067. 10.1016/j.jdcr.2018.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Narayanan S, Callis‐Duffin K, Batten J, Agarwal N. Improvement of psoriasis during sunitinib therapy for renal cell carcinoma. Am J Med Sci. 2010;339(6):580–581. 10.1097/maj.0b013e3181dd1aa5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Keshtgarpour M, Dudek AZ. SU‐011248, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor, controls chronic psoriasis. Transl Res. 2007;149(3):103–106. 10.1016/j.trsl.2007.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Luengas‐Martinez A, Paus R, Young HS. Antivascular endothelial growth factor‐A therapy: a novel personalized treatment approach for psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2021;186(5):82–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2335–2342. 10.1056/nejmoa032691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Dubin A, Freeman KS, Charles J, Ammar DA, Ehrhart EJ. Pilot study supporting the existence of novel lymphatic channels within the canine anterior uveal tract using Lyve‐1 and CD31. Vet Ophthalmol. 2021;24(4):354–360. 10.1111/vop.12893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Wang X.‐N, McGovern N, Gunawan M, Richardson C, Windebank M, Siah T.‐W, et al. A three‐dimensional atlas of human dermal leukocytes, lymphatics, and blood vessels. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(4):965–974. 10.1038/jid.2013.481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zhang X, Yin M, Zhang LJ. Keratin 6, 16 and 17‐critical barrier alarmin molecules in skin wounds and psoriasis. Cells. 2019;8(8):807. 10.3390/cells8080807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Keijsers RRMC, Joosten I, van Erp PEJ, Koenen HJPM, van de Kerkhof PCM. Cellular sources of IL‐17 in psoriasis: a paradigm shift? Exp Dermatol. 2014;23(11):799–803. 10.1111/exd.12487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Zhang Y, Shi Y, Lin J, Li X, Yang B, Zhou J. Immune cell infiltration analysis demonstrates excessive mast cell activation in psoriasis. Front Immunol. 2021;12:773280. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.773280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tiirikainen ML, Woetmann A, Norsgaard H, Santamaria‐Babí LF, Lovato P. Ex vivo culture of lesional psoriasis skin for pharmacological testing. J Dermatol Sci. 2020;97(2):109–116. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2019.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Luengas‐Martínez A, Hardman‐Smart J, Rutkowski D, Purba TS, Paus R, Young HS. Vascular endothelial growth factor blockade induces dermal endothelial cell apoptosis in a clinically relevant skin organ culture model. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2020;33(3):170–177. 10.1159/000508344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Young HS, Summers AM, Read IR, Fairhurst DA, Plant DJ, Campalani E, et al. Interaction between genetic control of vascular endothelial growth factor production and retinoid responsiveness in psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(2):453–459. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Anyfanti P, Margouta A, Goulas K, Gavriilaki M, Lazaridou E, Patsatsi A, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in psoriasis: an updated review. Front Med. 2022;9:864185. 10.3389/fmed.2022.864185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Michalska A, Teichman R, Kręcisz B, Siudak Z, Stępień R, Sadowski M. Cardiovascular risk in patients with plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis without a clinically overt cardiovascular disease: the role of endothelial progenitor cells. Adv Dermatol Allergol. 2020;37(3):299–305. 10.5114/ada.2020.96085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Li J, Hou H, Zhou L, Wang J, Liang J, Li J, et al. Increased angiogenesis and migration of dermal microvascular endothelial cells from patients with psoriasis. Exp Dermatol. 2021;30(7):937–981. 10.1111/exd.14329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Bhushan M, McLaughlin B, Weiss JB, Griffiths CE. Levels of endothelial cell stimulating angiogenesis factor and vascular endothelial growth factor are elevated in psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141(6):1054–1060.23. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03205.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Zhang N, Zhang G, Zheng Y, Wang T, Wang H. Effect of Avastin on the number and structure of tumor blood vessels of nude mice with A549 lung adenocarcinoma. Exp Ther Med. 2014;8(6):1723–1726. 10.3892/etm.2014.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Arjaans M, Oude Munnink TH, Oosting SF, Terwisscha van Scheltinga AGT, Gietema JA, Garbacik ET, et al. Bevacizumab‐induced normalization of blood vessels in tumors hampers antibody uptake. Cancer Res. 2013;73(11):3347–3355. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-3518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Principles and mechanisms of vessel normalization for cancer and other angiogenic diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(6):417–427. 10.1038/nrd3455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Winkler F, Kozin SV, Tong RT, Chae S.‐S, Booth MF, Garkavtsev I, et al. Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: role of oxygenation, angiopoietin‐1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell. 2004;6(6):553–563. 10.1016/s1535-6108(04)00305-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Willett CG, Duda DG, Di Tomaso E, Boucher Y, Ancukiewicz M, Sahani DV, et al. Efficacy, safety, and biomarkers of neoadjuvant bevacizumab, radiation therapy, and fluorouracil in rectal cancer: a multidisciplinary phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(18):3020–3026. 10.1200/jco.2008.21.1771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Batchelor TT, Sorensen AG, di Tomaso E, Zhang W.‐T, Duda DG, Cohen KS, et al. AZD2171, a pan‐VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Cell. 2007;11(1):83–95. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Claramunt García R, Muñoz Cid CL, Sánchez Ruiz A, Marín Pozo JF. Bevacizumab and aflibercept in second‐line metastatic colorectal cancer: 12 years of experience. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;78(2):287–291. 10.1007/s00228-021-03235-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Zhao Z, Li J, Ye R, Wu X, Gao L, Niu B. A phase II clinical study of combining FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus erlotinib in 2nd‐line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Medicine. 2017;96(30):e7182. 10.1097/md.0000000000007182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Wong M, Frank JH, Shields CL. Non‐small cell lung cancer with iris metastasis controlled with osimertinib and monthly intravitreal bevacizumab. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2022;25:p101269. 10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Yamasaki M, Akami I, Nakano K, Doi M, Kitaguchi S, Kondo T, et al. Carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab as first‐line treatment for non‐small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(2):923–928. 10.21873/anticanres.11400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Liu X, Lu Y, Qin S. Atezolizumab and bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanism, pharmacokinetics and future treatment strategies. Future Oncol. 2021;17(17):2243–2256. 10.2217/fon-2020-1290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Ferrara N, Adamis AP. Ten years of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(6):385–403. 10.1038/nrd.2015.17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Garcia J, Hurwitz HI, Sandler AB, Miles D, Coleman RL, Deurloo R, et al. Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in cancer treatment: a review of 15 years of clinical experience and future outlook. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020;86:102017. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Song L, Zhou R, Li X, Pan D. Combination of bevacizumab and dual immunotherapy for extensive‐disease small‐cell lung cancer: a case report. Immunotherapy. 2021;13(16):1309–1315. 10.2217/imt-2021-0025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Keren A, Bertolini M, Keren Y, Ullmann Y, Paus R, Gilhar A. Human organ rejuvenation by VEGF‐A: lessons from the skin. Sci Adv. 2022;8(25):eabm6756. 10.1126/sciadv.abm6756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Grunewald M, Kumar S, Sharife H, Volinsky E, Gileles‐Hillel A, Licht T, et al. Counteracting age‐related VEGF signaling insufficiency promotes healthy aging and extends life span. Science. 2022;373(6554):eabc8479. 10.1126/science.abc8479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Zhu D, Li Y, Zhang Z, Xue Z, Hua Z, Luo X, et al. Recent advances of nanotechnology‐based tumor vessel‐targeting strategies. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19(1):435. 10.1186/s12951-021-01190-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Elice F, Rodeghiero F. Side effects of anti‐angiogenic drugs. Thromb Res. 2012;129(Suppl l):S50–S53. 10.1016/s0049-3848(12)70016-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Karas A, Holmannova D, Borsky P, Fiala Z, Andrys C, Hamakova K, et al. Significantly altered serum levels of NAD, AGE, RAGE, CRP, and elastin as potential biomarkers of psoriasis and aging—a case‐control study. Biomedicines. 2022;10(5):1133. 10.3390/biomedicines10051133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Borsky P, Chmelarova M, Fiala Z, Hamakova K, Palicka V, Krejsek J, et al. Aging in psoriasis vulgaris: female patients are epigenetically older than healthy controls. Immun Ageing. 2021;18(1):10. 10.1186/s12979-021-00220-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Mercurio L, Lulli D, Mascia F, Dellambra E, Scarponi C, Morelli M, et al. Intracellular Insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) contributes to the senescence of keratinocytes in psoriasis by stabilizing cytoplasmic p21. Aging. 2020;12(8):6823–6851. 10.18632/aging.103045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Hu SCS, Lan CCE. Psoriasis and cardiovascular comorbidities: focusing on severe vascular events, cardiovascular risk factors and implications for treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2211. 10.3390/ijms18102211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Yan B.‐X, Chen X.‐Y, Ye L.‐R, Chen J.‐Q, Zheng M, Man X.‐Y. Cutaneous and systemic psoriasis: classifications and classification for the distinction. Front Med. 2021;8:649408. 10.3389/fmed.2021.649408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Ito N, Sugawara K, Bodó E, Takigawa M, van Beek N, Ito T, et al. Corticotropin‐releasing hormone stimulates the in situ generation of mast cells from precursors in the human hair follicle mesenchyme. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(4):995–1004. 10.1038/jid.2009.387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Sugawara K, Bíró T, Tsuruta D, Tóth BI, Kromminga A, Zákány N, et al. Endocannabinoids limit excessive mast cell maturation and activation in human skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(3):726–738.e8. 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Bai Q, Li X, Wang X, Xu Y, Wang L, Zhang Q, et al. VEGF is involved in the increase of dermal microvascular permeability induced by tryptase. ISRN Dermatol. 2012;2012:941465–941468. 10.5402/2012/941465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Ribatti D, Ranieri G. Tryptase, a novel angiogenic factor stored in mast cell granules. Exp Cell Res. 2015;332(2):157–162. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.11.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Blair RJ, Meng H, Marchese MJ, Ren S, Schwartz LB, Tonnesen MG, et al. Human mast cells stimulate vascular tube formation. Tryptase is a novel, potent angiogenic factor. J Clin Invest. 1997;99(11):2691–2700. 10.1172/jci119458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Lee KS, Kim SR, Park SJ, Min KH, Lee KY, Choe YH, et al. Mast cells can mediate vascular permeability through regulation of the PI3K‐HIF‐1alpha‐VEGF axis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(8):787–797. 10.1164/rccm.200801-008oc [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Wroblewski M, Bauer R, Cubas Córdova M, Udonta F, Ben‐Batalla I, Legler K, et al. Mast cells decrease efficacy of anti‐angiogenic therapy by secreting matrix‐degrading granzyme B. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):269. 10.1038/s41467-017-00327-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Fukasawa T, Toyama S, Enomoto A, Yoshizaki‐Ogawa A, Norimatsu Y, Tateishi S, et al. Utility of nailfold capillary assessment for predicting psoriatic arthritis based on a prospective observational cohort study. Rheumatology. 2022:664. 10.1093/rheumatology/keac664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Neil JE, Brown MB, WilliamsNeil ACJE, Brown MB, Williams AC. Human skin explant model for the investigation of topical therapeutics. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):21192. 10.1038/s41598-020-78292-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information S1
Supporting Information S2
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
