Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 Mar 25;87(8):5412–5418. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c00472

Metal-Mediated Organocatalysis in Water: Serendipitous Discovery of Aldol Reaction Catalyzed by the [Ru(bpy)2(nornicotine)2]2+ Complex

David Guzmán Ríos 1, Miguel A Romero 1, José A González-Delgado 1, Jesús F Arteaga 1,*, Uwe Pischel 1,*
PMCID: PMC10550203  PMID: 35337184

Abstract

graphic file with name jo2c00472_0009.jpg

The [Ru(bpy)2(Nor)2]2+ complex (Nor = nornicotine) is an efficient catalyst for the aldol reaction of acetone with activated benzaldehydes in a buffered aqueous solution. The metal plays the role of an activator for the nornicotine organocatalyst ligands. The resulting catalytic activity is potentiated by a factor of about 4.5 as compared to free nornicotine. Similar rate enhancements can be achieved by using Zn(II) cations as the activator. The observations are rationalized with the reduced basicity of the pyrrolidine N in nornicotine due to the enhanced electron withdrawal of the metal-complexed pyridyl moiety.

Introduction

In the past 2 decades, organocatalysis has developed into an indispensable tool in the synthesis of functional organic molecules, especially those with low molecular weight.1−7 A very prominent methodological approach toward organocatalysis is aminocatalysis, implying covalent activation through the formation of enamines or iminium ions between the catalyst and a substrate.4,6,8,9 Special focus has been on proline derivatives that can serve as organocatalysts (enamine activation) in aldol reactions,2,8−11 being an archetypal carbon–carbon bond formation strategy in synthetic organic chemistry. The efforts dedicated to the development of improved and more efficient catalysts have been always accompanied by concerns regarding the sustainability of organocatalysis. Hence, avoiding or reducing the environmentally hazardous use of organic solvents and shifting this type of chemistry to aqueous media have been continuous and central objectives in the field.6,8,9,12,13 In many cases, this challenge was approached by implementing experimental conditions that involve the use of water in the presence of organic solvents.14−18 This bears the additional effect that the organic transformations may be accelerated by making use of hydrophobic effects that assist spatial preorganization of the implied reaction partners. One of the first examples for “in-water” enamine catalysis,19−22 using a minimum amount of organic co-solvent, was published by the Janda group, who discovered that nornicotine (a nicotine metabolite) works for aldol reactions in buffered aqueous solution.10,23,24

In the quest for photoactivatable organocatalytic systems,25,26 we have recently focused on the use of Ru(II)-pyridyl complexes,27 which are known to release pyridine ligands on irradiation with visible light.28 However, when exploring the complex [Ru(bpy)2(Nor)2]2+ (1; Nor = nornicotine; see structure in Scheme 1) with the purpose of photoreleasing nornicotine and initiating a catalyzed aldol reaction between acetone and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde, we noted a significantly accelerated reaction without applying light irradiation. This process was noted to occur even faster than the catalysis by nornicotine alone. Motivated by this observation, we set out to study the process in more detail.

Scheme 1. Structures of the Ru(II) Complex 1 and Nornicotine (Employed in Racemic Form, Either as Free Catalyst or Ligand in Complex 1).

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

Aldol reaction between benzaldehydes and acetone. Note that the aldol is formed as a racemic mixture.

Results and Discussion

The [Ru(bpy)2(Nor)2]2+ complex (1) was prepared from Ru(bpy)2Cl2 as the precursor and stepwise ligand exchange according to procedures that are reported in the literature.27,28 The analytical characterization (1H NMR, 1H–1H COSY, 13C NMR DEPT-135, 13C NMR DEPTQ-135, 1H–13C HSQC, high-resolution mass spectrometry, and FT-IR) revealed the identity and purity of the compound; see Figures S1–S7 in the Supporting Information.

As a starting point, we have chosen the same model reaction as Janda and co-workers in their original work: the aldol reaction between acetone and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (4-NO2-BA) as activated carbonyl compound (see Scheme 1).10 The course of the reaction was followed by monitoring characteristic 1H NMR signals of the reactant benzaldehyde and the formed aldol product (see Figure 1). 4-NO2-BA is accompanied by some amount (ca. 20%) of the corresponding hydrate,29 being in a chemical equilibrium with the former. The presence of the hydrate is especially evident by the observation of the signal for the CH(OH)2 proton at 6.15 ppm. In the course of the aldol reaction, the signals of both forms disappear and the signals of the aldol product are observed. For the benzaldehyde, this is verified for the CHO proton at 10.12 ppm and the aromatic proton signals at 8.18 and 8.45 ppm. On the other hand, the aromatic proton signals at 7.64 and 8.28 ppm and the signal of the CH(OH) proton at 5.31 ppm of the aldol product appear progressively.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Monitoring of the reaction between 4-NO2-BA (3.6 mM) and acetone (270 mM) in the presence of 1 (1.1 mM) in phosphate-buffered D2O (45 mM, pD 8.5) at 298 K.

First, we compared the reaction kinetics for the aldol reaction of 270 mM acetone with 3.6 mM 4-NO2-BA in phosphate-buffered D2O (45 mM, pD 8.5). The corresponding plot for the noncatalyzed reaction and the aldol reaction in the presence of 1 or nornicotine (1.1 mM) is shown in Figure 2. As can be clearly seen, the reaction is considerably accelerated in the presence of 1, as compared to the nornicotine-catalyzed one or the noncatalyzed background reaction (see corresponding 1H NMR monitoring in the Supporting Information—Figures S15 and S16).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Kinetic curves for the reaction of 4-NO2-BA (3.6 mM) with acetone (270 mM) under varying conditions in phosphate-buffered (45 mM, pD 8.5) D2O. Black points: presence of 1 (1.1 mM); green points: presence of nornicotine (1.1 mM); blue points: noncatalyzed reaction. The curve constructed from the red points ([4-NO2-BA] = 4 mM; [acetone] = 300 mM; [1] = 1.2 mM) corresponds to a pre-irradiated sample in 45 mM phosphate-buffered D2O (25 min at >455 nm and before adding acetone).

Reaction rate constants kobs were determined from the slope of a plot of ln([benzaldehyde]) versus time t. For all investigated cases (see Table 1), a linear plot was obtained, which is in accordance with a pseudo-first order kinetic regime. The kobs values for the noncatalyzed aldol reaction of 4-NO2-BA with acetone and the nornicotine-catalyzed version were determined as 3.4 × 10–4 and 1.8 × 10–3 min–1, respectively (see Table 1). These values are ca. 2–5 times lower than those reported by the Janda group,10 which is explained by the lower temperature at which our study was performed (298 K in this work vs 310 K for the previous study). The kobs for the same reaction, but catalyzed by 1, was measured as 8.5 × 10–3 min–1. Hence, the presence of 1 yields an additional acceleration of the reaction by a factor of ca. 4.7 as compared to free nornicotine.

Table 1. Reaction Rate Constants and Chemical Yields for the Aldol Reaction between Acetone and Benzaldehyde Reactants.

entry conditionsa kobs (min–1)b yield (%)c
1 1 (1.1 mM), 4-NO2-BA 8.5 × 10–3 91
2 1 (0.55 mM), 4-NO2-BA 6.5 × 10–3 87
3 1 (1.2 mM), pre-irradiated >455 nm, 4-NO2-BAd 7.4 × 10–3 88
4 1 (1.2 mM), pre-irradiated >455 nm, 4-NO2-BA, TPPMS (1.2 mM)d 7.0 × 10–3 86
5 1 (1.1 mM), 4-NO2-BA, TPPMS (9 mM) 7.8 × 10–3 90
6 1 (1.1 mM), 4-NO2-BA, TPPMS (26 mM) 5.8 × 10–3 83
7 1 (1.1 mM), 4-NO2-BA, TPPMS (50 mM) 1.3 × 10–3 32
8 Zn(II) (0.3 mM), (±)-nornicotine (1.2 mM), 4-NO2-BAd,e 2.8 × 10–3 55
9 Zn(II) (0.6 mM), (±)-nornicotine (1.2 mM), 4-NO2-BAd,e 3.4 × 10–3 65
10 Zn(II) (1.2 mM), (±)-nornicotine (1.2 mM), 4-NO2-BAd,e 4.9 × 10–3 78
11 (±)-nornicotine (1.1 mM), 4-NO2-BAf 1.8 × 10–3 43
12 background reaction (non-catalyzed), 4-NO2-BA 3.4 × 10–4 8
13 1 (1.1 mM), 4-CN-BA 4.4 × 10–3 74
14 1 (1.1 mM), 4-CF3-BA 1.9 × 10–3 44
15 1 (1.1 mM), 4-Cl-BA 5.1 × 10–4 13
16 1 (1.1 mM), 4-H-BA 3.4 × 10–4 11
17 1 (1.1 mM), 4-Me-BA 1.7 × 10–4 6
18 1 (1.1 mM), 4-MeO-BA 4.9 × 10–5 2
Open in a new tab
a

The reactions were generally carried out with [4-R-BA] = 3.6 mM and [acetone] = 270 mM in phosphate-buffered D2O (45 mM, pD 8.5) at 298 K, except otherwise indicated (entries 3,4, 8, 9, and 10). The structures of the tested benzaldehydes 4-R-BA are given in Scheme 1. TPPMS: triphenylphosphine monosulfonate.

b

Pseudo-first-order reaction rate constants, corrected for the minor presence of hydrate for activated benzaldehydes (4-NO2-BA, 4-CN-BA, and 4-CF3-BA).

c

Chemical yield of the aldol product after 5 h, determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.

d

[4-NO2-BA] = 4 mM, [acetone] = 300 mM.

e

Done in a nonbuffered solution (pD 7.4).

f

The reaction at pD 7.4 (nonbuffered solution) yields the same reaction rate constant.

Note that the reaction rate constant shows a mild dependence on the catalyst concentration (see Table 1). However, even for 0.55 mM 1 (corresponding effectively to 1.1 mM nornicotine ligands), still a 3.6 times higher kobs (6.5 × 10–3 min–1) was obtained as compared to the reaction that was catalyzed by 1.1 mM free nornicotine. This excludes that a trivial concentration effect is at the origin of the observed acceleration by 1. Without surprise, the reaction that used 1 as catalyst, translated directly into a higher chemical yield (corresponding to a fixed reaction time of 5 h): 91% for 1.1 mM 1 versus 43% for 1.1 mM nornicotine and merely 8% for the noncatalyzed reaction.

In order to screen the scope of the reaction, we tested several other benzaldehyde-derived reactants (see Scheme 1), varying the electronic demands through the para substituent (see rate constants in Table 1 and the Supporting Information for the corresponding 1H NMR monitoring—Figures S9, S20–S25). The substituent constants cover an extended range of −0.27 ≤ σpara ≤ +0.78.30 The increment of the electrophilic character of the aldehyde carbon by electron accepting substituents is clearly evident, leading to the reactivity order NO2 > CN > CF3 ≫ Cl > H > CH3 > OCH3. Even with the less activated 4-CF3-BA, the reaction rate constant of the reaction catalyzed by 1 is as high as the nornicotine-catalyzed reaction of the far more activated 4-NO2-BA. The corresponding Hammett plot yields a straight line (n = 7, r2 = 0.9695) with a positive slope (see Figure 3) and the reaction constant ρ was determined as +1.89. This relatively large positive value points to the significant susceptibility of the reaction to electron-withdrawal from the reaction center of the benzaldehyde derivative.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Hammett plot for the aldol reaction between various benzaldehydes and acetone, catalyzed by 1.

The results of the linear-free-energy-relationship analysis are in line with the previously established mechanism of nornicotine-catalyzed aldol reactions between benzaldehydes and acetone.23 According to this literature precedence, the C–C bond formation between the enamine and the benzaldehyde reactant is the predominant process of the rate-determining step, which is accompanied by a minor contribution of the posterior C–N bond hydrolysis. Intuitively, the C–C bond formation is favored by an increased electrophilic character of the benzaldehyde carbonyl C atom.

The instrumental role of the Ru(II) metal center in the activation of the nornicotine ligand was confirmed by conducting the experiments (270 mM acetone; 3.6 mM 4-NO2-BA; 1.1 mM 1) in the presence of a strongly Ru(II)-binding phosphine (triphenylphosphine monosulfonate; TPPMS) as a competitive ligand. Increasing concentrations of TPPMS led to a significant slowing down of the aldol reaction (see reaction rate constants in Table 1). For example, for the presence of 50 mM TPPMS, the reaction rate constant was ca. 6.5 times smaller than for the absence of the competitor ligand and in absolute terms very close to the rate constant for the reaction catalyzed by free nornicotine. The observations can be interpreted in two scenarios: (a) the competitive displacement of the nornicotine from the ligand sphere of the Ru(II) by TPPMS or (b) the occupation of a previously generated vacancy at the Ru(II) metal center by TPPMS.

Indeed, as a working hypothesis, it is naturally tempting to postulate the thermal pre-dissociation of one nornicotine ligand, thereby creating a vacancy at the metal center. This could plausibly initiate a catalytic cycle. In this respect, it is important to return for a moment to the starting point of this work, comprising in the exploitation of the photoactivatable release of nornicotine by visible-light irradiation (λexc > 455 nm, long-pass filter) of 1. The photoreaction was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy and UV/vis spectroscopy (see Figure 4 and Figure S27 in the Supporting Information). It leads to the release of one of the nornicotine ligands (photoreaction quantum yield Φrca. 4.5%; determined by ferrioxalate actinometry), as confirmed by the relative integration of 1H NMR signals that belong to the released nornicotine and to the remaining complexed ligand. This was corroborated by the mass-spectrometric observation of the corresponding complex, where one of the nornicotine ligands is photosubstituted by water solvent (see Figure S28 in the Supporting Information).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Partial 1H NMR spectra, monitoring the photorelease of nornicotine from 1(1.2 mM) in phosphate-buffered D2O (50 mM, pD 8.5) at 298 K; irradiation at >455 nm. (b) Corresponding kinetics of the photorelease of nornicotine (blue line) from 1 (red line).

If the hypothesis of creating a vacancy, and thereby initiating a catalytic cycle, would be sustained, then the previous photoactivation of 1, forming [Ru(bpy)2(Nor)(D2O)]2+, should lead to a faster aldol reaction. A simple comparison of the kinetic curves for the reactions in the dark and for pre-irradiated 1 show that this is not the case. Instead of observing a more efficient reaction for pre-photoactivation, even a slightly less efficient reaction was noted, that is, 8.5 × 10–3 s–1 for 1 versus 7.4 × 10–3 s–1 for [Ru(bpy)2(Nor)(D2O)]2+ (see Figure 2 and Figure S13 in the Supporting Information). This is explained by the fact that the photoreleased nornicotine loses the extra activation by metal coordination (see below), with only one nornicotine remaining in the coordination sphere of the Ru center.

In addition, blocking the vacant position at the metal center by competitive displacement of D2O in the [Ru(bpy)2(Nor)(D2O)]2+ complex with one equivalent of the much stronger binding TPPMS has no further consequence for the rate constant (kobs = 7.0 × 10–3 s–1). Also, the 1H NMR spectrum of 1 (1.2 mM) in phosphate-buffered D2O in the presence of acetone (300 mM) does not evidence ligand exchange, as no free nornicotine is observed in the course of 17 h of monitoring. However, mass-spectrometric evidence was obtained for the formation of the nornicotine-derived enamine, with both modified ligands remaining in the coordination sphere of 1 (see Figures S30 and S31 in the Supporting Information). These joint observations support the interpretation that the metal center is not directly involved in the substrate activation, for example, through a type II mechanism, involving enolate stabilization. Instead, the aldol reaction is catalyzed via an enamine mechanism (type I mechanism).31,32

Consequently, we turned our attention to coordination-induced changes of the electronic nature of the nornicotine organocatalyst itself. The Janda group reported that the pyridine ring in nornicotine can be replaced with a phenyl ring bearing electronically variable substitution.24 They found that strong electron-accepting substituents (such as NO2 or CF3) further accelerate the aldol reaction between acetone and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde as compared to nornicotine as an organocatalyst. A plausible reasoning for this observation is the reduction of the basicity of the pyrrolidine, leaving a higher percentage of the amine nonprotonated and thus active for the required enamine formation with acetone. The pyridyl moiety in nornicotine has an electron-withdrawing character as compared to a plain phenyl ring. On interaction with positively charged metal cations [such as in the Ru(II) complex 1] this electron-withdrawing character should be potentiated, leading consequently to further rate enhancement as observed herein.

This result has additional consequences for conducting the nornicotine-catalyzed aldol reaction under physiological conditions. The common presence of biologically relevant metal cations that can coordinate with the pyridine may further accelerate the reaction, similar as observed for complex 1. To this end, we decided to monitor the reaction kinetics of the aldol reaction between 4-NO2-BA and acetone for the presence of Zn(II) cations. Noteworthy, Zn(II) has been used successfully before as Lewis-acid in proline-catalyzed aldol reactions31−37 or as a templating agent for the preorganization of bifunctional proline-thiourea organocatalysts.38,39

In order to avoid deactivation of the Zn(II) in the form of insoluble zinc salt precipitates, the reaction was carried out at pD 7.4 in nonbuffered D2O. As shown in Figure 5, increasing amounts of ZnCl2 result in a significantly faster reaction, being ca. 3 times faster for the presence of 1 equivalent Zn(II) as compared to the sole presence of only nornicotine (4.9 × 10–3 min–1 vs 1.8 × 10–3 min–1). Mass spectrometric evidence (see Supporting Information, Figure S29) was obtained for the formation of the [Zn(Nor)2]2+ complex (Nor = nornicotine). The complex is involved in the formation of the corresponding nornicotine-derived enamine with the ligand remaining attached to the Zn(II) center (see Figure S32). This observation hints on a prevailing type I mechanism (enamine catalysis) and a similar catalyst activation effect by the metal as discussed for the Ru(II) complex. Indeed, the catalysis of the reaction between acetone and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde by Zn(proline)2 was shown as well to proceed via the type I mechanism, excluding catalysis by enolate stabilization (type II) mechanism.31

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Influence of Zn(II) in the organocatalytic performance of nornicotine (1.2 mM) in the aldol reaction between 4-NO2-BA (4 mM) and acetone (300 mM) in nonbuffered D2O (pD 7.4); red: absence of Zn(II); black: 0.3 mM Zn(II); green: 0.6 mM Zn(II); and blue: 1.2 mM Zn(II).

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have found that the metal coordination of the pyridyl unit of nornicotine enhances its organocatalytic potential in the aldol reaction of benzaldehydes with acetone (see Scheme 2). The finding of metal-mediated activation of nornicotine provides an additional layer of fine-tuning for this archetypal organocatalyst. The linear free energy relationship analysis points toward an unaltered reaction mechanism with respect to what is established for nornicotine. The role of the metal [Ru(II) in this case] is that of an activator, but it does not participate in the catalytic process itself. This has been further corroborated by making use of the peculiar fact that the [Ru(bpy)2(Nor)2]2+ complex 1 photoreleases one nornicotine ligand. However, the thus created vacancy at the metal center did not lead to a further acceleration of the aldol reaction. The serendipitous finding for the Ru(II) can be expanded toward other metals with more biological relevance. In this context, we found that the nornicotine catalytic efficiency is also enhanced by the presence of Zn(II) ions.

Scheme 2. Proposed Catalytic Cycle for the Aldol Reaction of 4-NO2-BA with Acetone in the Presence of 1.

Scheme 2

Open in a new tab

Experimental Section

General

All reagents were obtained from commercial sources and used without further purification unless otherwise indicated. Ru(bpy)2Cl2, the benzaldehyde derivatives (4-R-BA, R = NO2, CN, CF3, Cl, H, CH3, and OCH3), acetone, ZnCl2, 3-(diphenylphosphino) benzenesulfonic acid sodium salt (triphenylphosphine monosulfonate; TPPMS), and ammonium hexafluoro phosphate (NH4PF6) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. (±)-(Pyrrolidin-2-yl)pyridine [(±)-nornicotine] was from Apollo Scientific. The NMR spectra were recorded on a 500 MHz spectrometer (Bruker 500 MR). Methanol-d4, dimethylsulfoxide-d6, and D2O (all 99 atom-% D) were used as solvents, and the spectra were referenced to the residual solvent peak (3.31, 2.50, and 4.79 ppm, respectively). The pD was adjusted with DCl or NaOD. Corrections due to isotope effects were applied using the equation pD = pH* + 0.4, where pH* is the reading taken from the pH meter.40 Photoirradiation experiments were conducted with a 150 W Xe lamp (LOT ORIEL) using a 455 nm long-pass filter. The irradiations were done with solutions contained in a 1-cm quartz cuvette or in an NMR tube at a 40 cm distance from the light source. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy measurements were performed using a FT/IR 4200 spectrometer (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan). High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was performed using an Elite QTOF, Bruker Daltonics autoflex MALDI-TOF. UV/vis absorption spectra were recorded using a Shimadzu UV-1603 spectrophotometer. Structural assignments were made with additional information from gCOSY and gHSQC experiments.

Synthesis of cis-Di[(±)-3-(pyrrolidin-2-yl)pyridine)](2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) Dichloride (1)

A suspension of Ru(bpy)2Cl2 (159 mg, 0.33 mmol) in water (7 mL), previously deoxygenated by bubbling with nitrogen gas during 15 min, was heated at 358 K until complete dissolution. Then, (±)-3-(pyrrolidin-2-yl)pyridine [(±)-nornicotine, 102 mg, 0.69 mmol, 0.1 mL] was added and the solution was heated at 358 K during 48 h. The compound was precipitated by the addition of NH4PF6, washed, and dried. The orange-red crude product of oily consistency was diluted in acetone and filtered through DowexS 1X8 (chloride form). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, obtaining a dark orange solid (208 mg, yield 81%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ 9.10 (dd, J = 9.4, 5.1 Hz, 2H), 8.55 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 8.48 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H), 8.38 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 8.21 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 8.00 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H), 7.90 (m, 5H), 7.48 (m, 2H), 7.37 (dd, J = 9.9, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 4.17 (m, 2H), 3.04 (m, 4H), 2.15 (m, 2H), 1.85 (m, 4H), 1.50 (m, 2H) ppm. 13C{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CD3OD): δ 159.3, 158.9, 154.2, 154.1, 153.9, 153.8, 153.7, 153.5, 153.4, 139.4, 139.1, 137.9, 137.7, 129.7, 129.1, 127.4, 127.3, 125.2, 125.0, 60.8, 60.7, 47.6, 47.5, 34.7, 34.4, 34.3, 26.0 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C38H40N8Ru, [M2+ – 2Cl] 355.1192; found, 355.1205. FTIR (nujol) νmax 3442, 2924, 2854, 2726, 1639, 1461, 1377, 1305, 845, 722 cm–1. UV/vis (20 μM in phosphate-buffered D2O) λmax (log ε/M–1cm–1): 245 (4.68), 298 (5.00), 345 (4.37), 452 (4.20) nm.

Rate Constant Determination

The rate constant for each substrate was determined by the method of initial rates under pseudo-first-order conditions. The assay was realized by preparing a solution of the catalyst [1 or (±)-nornicotine] in phosphate-buffered D2O (pD 8.5) and adding the benzaldehyde 4-R-BA in the form of a stock solution (50 mM) in dimethylsulfoxide-d6. This constituted the zero time solution. To this mixture, acetone was added in order to initiate the reaction. The amount of dimethylsulfoxide-d6 co-solvent in the aqueous solution was 7 vol %. For the presence of Zn(II) cations, the reaction was carried out in nonbuffered D2O and the pD was lowered to 7.4 in order to avoid the precipitation of insoluble zinc salts, such as hydroxides. The reaction kinetics was followed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The treatment of the kinetic data for the activated benzaldehydes 4-NO2-BA, 4-CN-BA, and 4-CF3-BA takes the small amount of hydrate into account.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the funding by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities (grant CTQ2017-89832-P and PID2020-119992GB-I00 for U.P.) and the University of Huelva (grant UHU-9-542-2019 for J.F.A.).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.2c00472.

  • NMR spectra, FT-IR spectrum, HRMS, and UV/vis absorption spectrum of 1; NMR monitoring of aldol reactions with benzaldehydes; and photorelease of nornicotine (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

jo2c00472_si_001.pdf (3.9MB, pdf)

References

  1. Ahrendt K. A.; Borths C. J.; MacMillan D. W. C. New strategies for organic catalysis: the first highly enantioselective organocatalytic Diels–Alder reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4243–4244. 10.1021/ja000092s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. List B.; Lerner R. A.; Barbas C. F. III Proline-Catalyzed Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2395–2396. 10.1021/ja994280y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Notz W.; List B. Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of anti-1,2-diols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7386–7387. 10.1021/ja001460v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mukherjee S.; Yang J. W.; Hoffmann S.; List B. Asymmetric Enamine Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5471–5569. 10.1021/cr0684016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MacMillan D. W. C. The advent and development of organocatalysis. Nature 2008, 455, 304–308. 10.1038/nature07367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. van der Helm M. P.; Klemm B.; Eelkema R. Organocatalysis in aqueous media. Nat. Rev. 2019, 3, 491–508. 10.1038/s41570-019-0116-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lassaletta J. M. Spotting trends in organocatalysis for the next decade. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3787–3791. 10.1038/s41467-020-17600-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mlynarski J.; Paradowska J. Catalytic asymmetric aldol reactions in aqueous media. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1502–1511. 10.1039/b710577k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mlynarski J.; Baś S. Catalytic asymmetric aldol reactions in aqueous media - a 5 year update. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 577–587. 10.1039/c3cs60202h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dickerson T. J.; Janda K. D. Aqueous Aldol Catalysis by a Nicotine Metabolite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3220–3221. 10.1021/ja017774f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Notz W.; Tanaka F.; Barbas C. F. III Enamine-Based Organocatalysis with Proline and Diamines: The Development of Direct Catalytic Asymmetric Aldol, Mannich, Michael, and Diels-Alder Reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 580–591. 10.1021/ar0300468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Raj M.; Singh V. K. Organocatalytic reactions in water. Chem. Commun. 2009, 45, 6687–6703. 10.1039/b910861k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jimeno C. Water in asymmetric organocatalytic systems: a global perspective. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 6147–6164. 10.1039/c6ob00783j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Córdova A.; Notz W.; Barbas C. F. III Direct organocatalytic aldol reactions in buffered aqueous media. Chem. Commun. 2002, 3024–3025. 10.1039/B207664K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brogan A. P.; Dickerson T. J.; Janda K. D. Enamine-Based Aldol Organocatalysis in Water: Are They Really “All Wet”. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8100–8102. 10.1002/anie.200601392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hayashi Y.; Sumiya T.; Takahashi J.; Gotoh H.; Urushima T.; Shoji M. Highly Diastereo- and Enantioselective Direct Aldol Reactions in Water. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 958–961. 10.1002/anie.200502488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mase N.; Nakai Y.; Ohara N.; Yoda H.; Takabe K.; Tanaka F.; Barbas C. F. III Organocatalytic Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reactions in Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 734–735. 10.1021/ja0573312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cruz-Acosta F.; de Armas P.; García-Tellado F. Water-compatible hydrogen-bond activation: a scalable and organocatalytic model for the stereoselective multicomponent aza-Henry reaction. Chem.—Eur J. 2013, 19, 16550–16554. 10.1002/chem.201303448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Oberhuber M.; Joyce G. F. A DNA-Templated Aldol Reaction as a Model for the Formation of Pentose Sugars in the RNA World. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7580–7583. 10.1002/anie.200503387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Font D.; Jimeno C.; Pericàs M. A. Polystyrene-supported hydroxyproline: an insoluble, recyclable organocatalyst for the asymmetric aldol reaction in water. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4653–4655. 10.1021/ol061964j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wu Y.; Zhang Y.; Yu M.; Zhao G.; Wang S. Highly efficient and reusable dendritic catalysts derived from N-prolylsulfonamide for the asymmetric direct aldol reaction in water. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4417–4420. 10.1021/ol061418q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maya V.; Raj M.; Singh V. K. Highly enantioselective organocatalytic direct aldol reaction in an aqueous medium. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2593–2595. 10.1021/ol071013l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dickerson T. J.; Lovell T.; Meijler M. M.; Noodleman L.; Janda K. D. Nornicotine Aqueous Aldol Reactions: Synthetic and Theoretical Investigations into the Origins of Catalysis. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6603–6609. 10.1021/jo048894j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rogers C. J.; Dickerson T. J.; Brogan A. P.; Janda K. D. Hammett Correlation of Nornicotine Analogues in the Aqueous Aldol Reaction: Implications for Green Organocatalysis. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3705–3708. 10.1021/jo050161r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stoll R. S.; Hecht S. Artificial Light-Gated Catalyst Systems. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5054–5075. 10.1002/anie.201000146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Maity C.; Trausel F.; Eelkema R. Selective activation of organocatalysts by specific signals. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 5999–6005. 10.1039/c8sc02019a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. González-Delgado J. A.; Romero M. A.; Boscá F.; Arteaga J. F.; Pischel U. Visible light-gated organocatalysis using a Ru(II)-photocage. Chem. Eur J. 2020, 26, 14229–14235. 10.1002/chem.202001893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zayat L.; Calero C.; Alborés P.; Baraldo L.; Etchenique R. A New Strategy for Neurochemical Photodelivery: Metal-Ligand Heterolytic Cleavage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 882–883. 10.1021/ja0278943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sayer J. M. Hydration of p-Nitrobenzaldehyde. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 2545–2547. 10.1021/jo00905a033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hansch C.; Leo A.; Taft R. W. A survey of Hammett substituent constants and resonance and field parameters. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165–195. 10.1021/cr00002a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kofoed J.; Darbre T.; Reymond J.-L. Dual mechanism of zinc-proline catalyzed aldol reactions in water. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1482–1484. 10.1039/b600703a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Paradowska J.; Pasternak M.; Gut B.; Gryzło B.; Mlynarski J. Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reactions Inspired by Two Types of Natural Aldolases: Water-Compatible Organocatalysts and ZnII Complexes. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 173–187. 10.1021/jo201584w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Darbre T.; Machuqueiro M. Zn-Proline catalyzed direct aldol reaction in aqueous media. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1090–1091. 10.1039/b301117h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kofoed J.; Machuqueiro M.; Reymond J.-L.; Darbre T. Zinc-proline catalyzed pathway for the formation of sugars. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1540–1541. 10.1039/b404465g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kofoed J.; Reymond J.-L.; Darbre T. Prebiotic carbohydrate synthesis: zinc-proline catalyzes direct aqueous aldol reactions of a-hydroxy aldehydes and ketones. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 1850–1855. 10.1039/b501512j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Itoh S.; Kitamura M.; Yamada Y.; Aoki S. Chiral Catalysts Dually Functionalized with Amino Acid and Zn2+ Complex Components for Enantioselective Direct Aldol Reactions Inspired by Natural Aldolases: Design, Synthesis, Complexation Properties, Catalytic Activities, and Mechanistic Study. Chem.—Eur J. 2009, 15, 10570–10584. 10.1002/chem.200900733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Penhoat M.; Barbry D.; Rolando C. Direct asymmetric aldol reaction co-catalyzed by L-proline and group 12 elements Lewis acids in the presence of water. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 159–162. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.11.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Serra-Pont A.; Alfonso I.; Jimeno C.; Solà J. Dynamic assembly of a zinc-templated bifunctional organocatalyst in the presence of water for the asymmetric aldol reaction. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 17386–17389. 10.1039/c5cc07847d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Serra-Pont A.; Alfonso I.; Solà J.; Jimeno C. An efficient dynamic asymmetric catalytic system within a zinc-templated network. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 7970–7973. 10.1039/c9cc03958a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Glasoe P. K.; Long F. A. Use of Glass Electrodes to Measure Acidities in Deuterium Oxide. J. Phys. Chem. 1960, 64, 188–190. 10.1021/j100830a521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jo2c00472_si_001.pdf (3.9MB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES