Skip to main content
Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons logoLink to Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons
. 2023 Jun 26;5(26):CASE23156. doi: 10.3171/CASE23156

Focal drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy associated with an ipsilateral anterior choroidal artery aneurysm: illustrative case

H Westley Phillips 1, Shivani D Rangwala 1, Joanna Papadakis 1, David J Segar 1, Melissa Tsuboyama 2, Anna L R Pinto 2, Joseph P Harmon 3, Sulpicio G Soriano 4, Carlos J Munoz 4, Joseph R Madsen 1, Alfred P See 1, Scellig S Stone 1,
PMCID: PMC10550554  PMID: 37399139

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of both an intracranial aneurysm and epilepsy, especially drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), is rare. Although the overall incidence of aneurysms associated with DRE is unclear, it is thought to be particularly infrequent in the pediatric population. Surgical ligation of the offending aneurysm has been reported in conjunction with resolving seizure activity, although few cases have cited a combined approach of aneurysm ligation and resection of an epileptogenic focus.

OBSERVATIONS

We present the case of a 14-year-old female patient with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy and an ipsilateral supraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm. Seizure semiology, electroencephalography monitoring, and magnetic resonance imaging all indicated a left temporal epileptogenic focus, in addition to an incidental aneurysm. The authors recommended a combined surgery involving resection of the temporal lesion and surgical clip ligation of the aneurysm. Near-total resection and successful ligation were achieved, and the patient has remained seizure free since surgery at 1 year postoperatively.

LESSONS

In patients with focal DRE and an adjacent intracranial aneurysm, a combined surgical approach involving both resection and surgical ligation can be used. Several surgical timing and neuroanesthetic considerations should be made to ensure the overall safety and efficacy of this procedure.

Keywords: drug-resistant epilepsy, focal epilepsy, ipsilateral cerebral aneurysm, pediatric epilepsy

ABBREVIATIONS: AChA = anterior choroidal artery, ASM = antiseizure medication, DRE = drug-resistant epilepsy, ECOG = electrocorticography, fMRI = functional magnetic resonance imaging, ICA = internal carotid artery, ICG-FA = indocyanine green fluorescence angiography, MRA = magnetic resonance angiography, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, PCA = posterior cerebral artery


Focal epilepsy is an important subgroup of pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), which affects up to 1% of the pediatric population.1 While focal epilepsies in children are often associated with malformations of cortical development and low-grade, epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumors, other lesional pathologies may also contribute to epileptogenesis.2–7 Although uncommon, unruptured intracranial aneurysms have been associated with seizures in select cases. Some postulate that cortical excitability secondary to mass effect and/or recurrent microhemorrhages may explain this occurrence,8,9 while others suggest that a correlation between ipsilateral aneurysms and seizures may exist.10,11 Despite these hypotheses, intracranial aneurysms remain invariably rare among pediatric patients, accounting for less than 5% of all cases treated at neurovascular centers,12,13 and comprise an even smaller subpopulation of pediatric patients with epilepsy.

The overall incidence of ipsilateral intracranial aneurysms associated with DRE is unknown, and to our knowledge, only 12 cases of intracranial aneurysms together with medically refractory epilepsy across 7 institutions have been reported.8,11,14–18 Most of these cases describe temporal lobe epilepsies and focal seizures with impaired awareness associated with middle cerebral artery or, in fewer instances, posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysms, which often resolved following surgical ligation of the offending aneurysm. All but 2 cases report on adult patients, underscoring the paucity of literature on this entity in pediatric patients.8,17 Furthermore, only a few studies have reported a combined treatment approach of surgical ligation of the unruptured aneurysm and resection of an epileptogenic focus.11,14,16,17

Given the dearth of literature outlining the surgical decision making, planning, and technical nuances associated with DRE coupled with an intracranial aneurysm, we present the case of a 14-year-old female patient with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy noted to have an ipsilateral supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm.

Illustrative Case

A 14-year-old, right-handed female patient presented to Boston Children’s Hospital Epilepsy Center with DRE associated with a left temporal lesion. Seizure onset was at approximately 4 years of age, with episodes of behavioral change and a scared look with her right arm shaking that could progress to bilateral tonic-clonic movements. These episodes occurred approximately 1 to 2 times per month. On neuropsychological examination, her IQ was in the extremely low range, with stronger visual-spatial processing compared with reasoning and verbal skills, as well as attention and executive function difficulties, all implicating dysfunction of the dominant frontotemporal systems. Her visual fields were intact.

Because of persistent seizures despite adequate trials of 3 antiseizure medications (ASMs), she was referred for epilepsy surgery evaluation. Long-term electroencephalography monitoring demonstrated left temporal slowing interictally and left hemispheric ictal onset maximum in the left temporal region. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a faintly T2-weighted hyperintense lesion with a hypointense medial rim in the left anterior temporal lobe with extension into the mesial structures and subtle contrast enhancement along the medial and superomedial uncus (Fig. 1A and B). Notably, a left supraclinoid ICA aneurysm was also identified medial to the uncal enhancement. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) confirmed a 4-mm saccular aneurysm arising posteriorly from the left anterior choroidal artery (AChA) (Fig. 1C and D). Functional MRI (fMRI) revealed left-dominant language and working memory, while visual and motor function demonstrated bilateral representation. Consensus was reached at a multidisciplinary epilepsy surgery conference to proceed with left frontotemporal craniotomy for electrocorticography (ECOG)-guided resection of the left temporal epileptic foci and microsurgical clipping of the left AChA aneurysm.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Preoperative axial (A) and coronal (B) T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images depicting a left anteromesial temporal lesion with subtle contrast enhancement along the medial and superomesial uncus (red circle) and preoperative axial (C) and sagittal three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction (D) MRA images depicting a 4-mm left AChA aneurysm (red arrows). Three-week postoperative axial (E) and coronal (F) T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced MR images status post–left craniotomy for lesion resection and 3-week postoperative axial (G) and sagittal 3D reconstruction (H) MRA demonstrating clip ligation of left AChA aneurysm.

Operative Course

After standard preoperative assessment and counseling, the patient was admitted to our institution on the day of surgery. General anesthesia was modified to permit intraoperative neuromonitoring, somatosensory evoked potentials, and ECOG. After the induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation, general anesthesia was maintained with dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg/hr), sufentanil (0.1 µg/kg/hr), and isoflurane (0.5%), and neuromuscular blockade with vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg/kg). To mitigate excessive blood loss, tranexamic acid (10 mg/kg loading dose and 5 mg/kg/hr) was administered to provide antifibrinolysis. Upon opening the dura, pre-resection ECOG was performed using a 4 × 8 subdural grid over the left anterolateral temporal lobe and a 2 × 8 grid extending posteriorly on the temporal lobe (Fig. 2A). Of note, mesial strip placement was deferred out of concern for aneurysm disruption. Initial ECOG data demonstrated left temporal interictal spiking predominantly at the anterior temporal tip. Less prominent spiking was noted in the posterior superior temporal gyrus, corresponding to receptive language activation identified on preoperative fMRI. An anterior temporal lobectomy, extending 3 cm posterior to the temporal tip on the superior temporal gyrus and 4 cm on the middle temporal gyrus, was planned.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Intraoperative microscope photographs demonstrating pre-resection ECOG (A), initial anterior temporal resection (B), post-resection ECOG (C), 4-mm left saccular AChA aneurysm exposure (D), post–clip ligation of the AChA aneurysm (E), and final left anterior temporal resection with clip ligation of ipsilateral AChA aneurysm (F).

Before temporal resection commenced, proximal control of the left ICA was obtained using a left lateral supraorbital trajectory. This helped identify the supraoptic arachnoid adhesions, free the ipsilateral optic nerve, and circumferentially release peri-carotid arachnoid bands that would allow for temporary clip occlusion in the event of an intraoperative rupture. A 20-mm straight temporary clip was prepared, and a 0.5 × 3 cottonoid was placed on the basal frontal surface to define the trajectory of the approach. Once proximal access to the supraclinoid ICA was obtained, the anterolateral temporal lobectomy was performed using a standard subpial technique. The lateral temporal cortex was resected en bloc with preservation of the mesial structures to minimize traction on the aneurysm and associated vasculature. Abnormal-appearing fibrous tissue was identified on the lateral margin of the remaining mesial structures. A small specimen was obtained and sent to pathology for frozen section analysis (Fig. 2B), which was suspicious for a low-grade glioneuronal neoplasm.

Following the lateral temporal resection, our attention was directed to further exposure of the ICA given the newly optimized access to the carotid cistern. Throughout this aneurysm exploration, the neuroanesthesia team transitioned to administering propofol, allowing for burst suppression as needed. The ICA was dissected and exposed distally. Notably, the arachnoid was abnormally thick, with hemosiderin staining concerning for a previous subclinical subarachnoid hemorrhage. Further release in the subfrontal chiasmatic and supracarotid regions demonstrated the PCA, the left third nerve, the AChA, and the posteriorly projecting AChA aneurysm.

Given the aneurysm’s size, morphology, and suspicion of a remote sentinel hemorrhage, the neurovascular and epilepsy surgical teams decided that further dissection may require temporary clip placement, necessitating the patient to be placed in burst suppression. However, since burst suppression may alter the ability to perform post-resection ECOG and pilot clipping may obstruct the remaining resection, further dissection and clip ligation of the aneurysm were deferred to allow for continuation of the mesial temporal resection.

The mesial structures were then removed in the usual subpial fashion. The uncus and amygdala were quite fibrous and difficult to dissect, resulting in a careful, piecemeal resection; this tissue was also sent to pathology. Following resection of the anterior 1 cm of the head of the hippocampus, post-resection ECOG was performed using a 1 × 8 strip on the inferior surface of the temporal lobe along the hippocampus posteriorly and another 4 × 8 grid that was placed over the lateral temporal lobe extending posteriorly (Fig. 2C). Prominent interictal spiking was noted posterior to the resection line near the middle and inferior temporal gyri, with no abnormal activity from the remaining posterior hippocampus. A safe margin for an extended resection was planned using the vein of Labbè as the posterior margin.

Following ECOG, our attention was returned to the ICA aneurysm, where propofol delivery recommenced. Further sharp microdissection was performed, the patient was placed in burst suppression, and the aneurysm neck and dome were released (Fig. 2D). An initial intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) was performed, demonstrating that the AChA derived from the shoulder of the aneurysm, precluding complete clipping of the aneurysm at its origin from the left ICA (Fig. 3A). A 10-mm straight temporary clip was placed on the proximal ICA for less than 10 minutes, allowing for the placement of a 6.5-mm, slightly curved permanent clip without visual evidence of parent vessel occlusion. During clip placement, a small site of aneurysm wall tear was noted on the inferior medial aspect of the aneurysm dome, which was secured on final clip positioning. A 5-mm mini-permanent clip occluded a small amount of neck residual at the distal end of the aneurysm. Proximal and distal temporary occlusion was initiated for 6 minutes for further inspection of the clip placement to confirm the exclusion of a small adjacent perforator (Fig. 2E). Subsequent visual inspection and an additional ICG-FA were performed to ensure complete aneurysm occlusion and continued perfusion of the parent artery and surrounding perforators without signs of vasospasm or occlusion (Fig. 3B).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Intraoperative ICG-FA demonstrating before (A) and after (B) surgical clip ligation of a left 4-mm saccular AChA aneurysm (note the Rhoton 6 instrument lifting the aneurysm dome in panel B).

With the aneurysm secured, the posterior resection of the middle and inferior temporal gyri and basal temporal lobe was completed in a subpial fashion using the previously planned posterior resection margin (Fig. 2F). Intraoperative MRI demonstrated complete resection of the enhancing lesion and a small infarct centered on the posteroinferior putamen. Closure then commenced in the standard fashion. After 11.5 hours, the patient emerged from general anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade. She responded to commands, tolerated tracheal extubation, and was admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for hemodynamic monitoring and serial neurological examinations.

Postoperative Course

Postoperatively, the patient resumed her home ASMs (levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, zonisamide) and experienced no lasting neurological deficits, except for a mild right superior quadrantanopia. The patient was discharged home on postoperative day 3 at her neurological baseline. MRI and MRA at 3 weeks postoperatively demonstrated complete resection of the lesion and clip ligation of the aneurysm (Fig. 1E and F). Since surgery, no new persistent neurological deficits have been identified, and the patient has reported improved vision. Additionally, she has remained seizure free through 1 year of follow-up. Her speech function has remained at baseline, although she noted subtle cognitive improvements enabling increased productivity at school; however, she continues to endorse reading and speech comprehension challenges. The patient has remained on ASMs following surgery per the recommendation of our epileptologists. Notably, one of her ASMs (zonisimade) was successfully weaned. Pathology was consistent with gliosis and possible meningioangiomatosis, which is rare but generally considered hamartomatous and nonneoplastic. The tissue samples were negative for both BRAF p. V600E and clinically significant fusions, although somatic alterations in the NF2 gene (NF2 c.1540A > G [p.M514V]) were noted on molecular Oncopanel analysis.

Patient Informed Consent

The necessary patient informed consent was obtained in this study.

Discussion

Intracranial aneurysms are rare in the pediatric population, and their association with focal epilepsy is not well understood. To our knowledge, this case involving a 14-year-old female patient with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy associated with an intracranial aneurysm is one of the youngest involving DRE and an ipsilateral ICA aneurysm. Given the dearth of literature on this association, we herein document our treatment approach and surgical decision-making process. In doing so, we highlight critical technical nuances for neurosurgeons to consider when attempting surgical clip ligation of an aneurysm and resection of a seizure focus during a single procedure.

Observations

While the prevalence of drug-resistant focal epilepsies associated with pediatric aneurysms remains unclear, focal epilepsy is one of the predominant forms of epilepsy in children.19 According to a recent meta-analysis by Sultana et al.,20 the cumulative incidence of DRE in the pediatric population is reported to be as high as 25%, with focal epilepsy being a significant predictor of DRE. As a result, patients with DRE are often considered for neurosurgical intervention to reduce seizure frequency and/or achieve seizure freedom, particularly when a lesional epileptogenic focus is identified, as seizure freedom rates as high as 60%–80% have been reported in pediatric series.21–26 In addition, improved cognition, mood, and quality of life can be achieved.25,27–29

Pediatric aneurysms are rare12,13 and can be more difficult to treat than adult aneurysms because of differences in size, intracranial locations, clinical presentations, and outcomes.13,30–32 In children with intracranial aneurysms, subarachnoid hemorrhage is a common presentation,17 in addition to clinical symptoms related to rupture, such as headache, vomiting, seizures, and loss of consciousness.33 Standard treatment modalities typically involve endovascular or microsurgical approaches,34 the latter of which was chosen in our case because of the simultaneous resection of the left temporal epileptogenic lesion. To maximize postoperative seizure control, resection was also combined with intraoperative ECOG, which has been shown to improve seizure outcomes in patients with low-grade lesions and focal cortical dysplasia.35–38

When deciding to perform both procedures concurrently, there were several important factors to consider. Notably, it was necessary to discuss whether clipping the aneurysm should occur during the same surgery as resection of the aforementioned lesion, and if done concurrently, what sequence would be most appropriate while also balancing neuroprotective strategies with the desire to perform ECOG. Another critical consideration involved the risk of removing brain structures adjacent to the aneurysm to allow direct exposure of the aneurysm, which could also lead to potential traction on the unsecured aneurysm and associated vasculature. Proximal control was achieved before resection to mitigate this risk.

Anecdotally, tumor progression and vessel wall involvement have been associated with the eventual rupture of an intracranial aneurysm.39 In addition, many reports on intracranial aneurysms and brain tumors emphasize treating the aneurysm before or concurrent with the tumor resection to safeguard against perioperative rupture.40–43 Although the pathology of our patient’s lesion did not definitively confirm neoplastic tissue, these findings suggest that treatment of the aneurysm at or before resection of an associated, possibly neoplastic epileptic lesion is likely warranted. Moreover, despite limited literature on the co-management of aneurysms and epilepsy, a few series have recommended a combined surgical approach when the aneurysm is positioned ipsilateral to the lesion.11,16,17 In our patient, the aneurysm’s ipsilateral location, coupled with the meningeal thickening and hemosiderin staining of the aneurysm dome observed during surgery, pointed toward the value of simultaneous management of the aneurysm and lesion. We do not believe there was a clinically detected remote hemorrhage event in the patient’s presentation; however, evidence of rupture would further justify the rationale for clipping the aneurysm in the same surgery as the lesion resection.

During surgery, several technical nuances were essential for ensuring the success of the resection and surgical ligation. Because mesial temporal/uncal dissection posed a significant risk of aneurysm rupture during surgery, careful and deliberate decisions were made in the surgical sequencing. We began the surgery by establishing pre-resection ECOG to measure baseline seizure activity. Before the temporal resection, we obtained proximal control of the aneurysm, allowing for temporary clip placement in the event of an intraoperative rupture. Then, we began an anterior temporal lobe resection, which improved visualization and the working corridor for eventual surgical clip ligation. At that point, however, it was realized that further dissection might require temporary clip placement and the patient being placed in burst suppression. Given that burst suppression can alter the feasibility of post-resection ECOG and that temporary clipping would have likely obstructed any additional resection, this portion of the procedure was deferred. Because of this, the aneurysm clipping followed the removal of the mesial temporal structures and post-resection ECOG.

Throughout the procedure, there were also a number of important neuroanesthetic considerations. Paramount among these involved the timing and use of propofol, which is standard for achieving burst suppression and has the benefit of fast recovery but can suppress epileptiform discharges on ECOG relevant to determining the extent of resection of an epileptogenic focus.44 Therefore, the anesthesia team started with sufentanil during the initial craniotomy and ECOG monitoring and transitioned to propofol during the aneurysm exploration and clipping portions of the procedure. Communication among the surgical team, epileptologists, and anesthesiologists regarding each stage of the surgery was critical to its overall success.

Lessons

Our case highlights the rare co-occurring entity of lesional DRE and ipsilateral intracranial aneurysm in a pediatric patient and the feasibility of a combined treatment approach. In these cases, we recommend the patient and family be counseled on the benefits of a combined surgical approach, involving both resection of the epileptogenic lesion and surgical ligation of the aneurysm. This procedure has several critical steps that require deliberation by a multidisciplinary surgical team, as each stage of the resection and ligation comes with its own risks and benefits.

The timing of aneurysm exploration and clip ligation is particularly important to this single-surgery approach. Early in the procedure, once the initial craniotomy and baseline ECOG are established, it is essential to obtain proximal exposure of the aneurysm in case of intraoperative rupture during later resection of the seizure focus. To minimize interference with post-resection ECOG monitoring and hindrance of the clip within the surgical cavity, clip ligation and subsequent burst suppression should be done after the majority of the epileptogenic lesion has been resected. Throughout the procedure, careful and constant communication between the surgical and anesthesia teams should occur, as the different surgical stages may necessitate different neuroanesthetic agents. In our case, the patient has done well postoperatively and remains seizure free at her neurological baseline since surgery.

Ultimately, focal DRE epilepsy associated with an ipsilateral intracranial aneurysm is rare. However, using a multidisciplinary approach and careful technical considerations enables the safe and effective treatment of both pathologies in a single operation.

Disclosures

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: Stone, Phillips, Rangwala, Segar, Pinto, See. Acquisition of data: Phillips, Rangwala, Papadakis, Segar, Tsuboyama, Pinto, Harmon, Soriano, See. Analysis and interpretation of data: Stone, Phillips, Rangwala, Papadakis, Tsuboyama, Pinto, Harmon, Soriano. Drafting of the article: Stone, Phillips, Rangwala, Papadakis, Segar, Pinto, Soriano. Critically revising the article: Stone, Phillips, Rangwala, Papadakis, Segar, Tsuboyama, Soriano, Madsen, See. Reviewed submitted version of the manuscript: Stone, Phillips, Papadakis, Segar, Tsuboyama, Pinto, Soriano, Madsen, See. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Stone. Administrative/technical/material support: Stone. Study supervision: Stone. Patient care: Munoz.

References

  • 1. Knupp K, Koh S, Park K. Pediatric epilepsy: five new things. Neurol Clin Pract. 2012;2(1):40–47. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e31824c6cbd. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Barkovich AJ, Dobyns WB, Guerrini R. Malformations of cortical development and epilepsy. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015;5(5):a022392. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a022392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Barkovich AJ, Guerrini R, Kuzniecky RI, Jackson GD, Dobyns WB. A developmental and genetic classification for malformations of cortical development: update 2012. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 5):1348–1369. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Represa A. Why malformations of cortical development cause epilepsy. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:250. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Blümcke I, Aronica E, Becker A, et al. Low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumours - the 2016 WHO classification. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(12):732–740. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kan P, Van Orman C, Kestle JR. Outcomes after surgery for focal epilepsy in children. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;24(5):587–591. doi: 10.1007/s00381-007-0545-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Pelliccia V, Deleo F, Gozzo F, et al. Early and late epilepsy surgery in focal epilepsies associated with long-term epilepsy-associated tumors. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(5):1147–1152. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sengupta RP, Saunders M, Clarke PR. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms—an unusual source of epilepsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1978;40(1-2):45–53. doi: 10.1007/BF01773114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yefet LS, Fatehi M, Aghakhani Y, Redekop G. Unruptured posterior cerebral artery aneurysm presenting with temporal lobe epilepsy. Can J Neurol Sci. 2020;47(6):866–868. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2020.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kamali AW, Cockerell OC, Butlar P. Aneurysms and epilepsy: an increasingly recognised cause. Seizure. 2004;13(1):40–44. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(03)00075-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lad SP, Shannon L, Byrne RW. Incidental aneurysms in temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: report of three cases and a review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg. 2012;26(1):69–74. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.601819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Beez T, Steiger HJ, Hänggi D. Evolution of management of intracranial aneurysms in children: a systematic review of the modern literature. J Child Neurol. 2016;31(6):773–783. doi: 10.1177/0883073815609153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. de Aguiar GB, Ozanne A, Elawady A, et al. Intracranial aneurysm in pediatric population: a single-center experience. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2022;57(4):270–278. doi: 10.1159/000524523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kamrin RP. Temporal lobe epilepsy caused by unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Arch Neurol. 1966;14(4):421–427. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1966.00470100077010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Whittle IR, Allsop JL, Halmagyi GM. Focal seizures: an unusual presentation of giant intracranial aneurysms. A report of four cases with comments on the natural history and treatment. Surg Neurol. 1985;24(5):533–540. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(85)90270-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Yacubian EM, Rosemberg S, da Silva HC, Jorge CL, de Oliveira E, de Assis LM. Intractable complex partial seizures associated with posterior cerebral artery giant aneurysm: a case report. Epilepsia. 1994;35(6):1317–1320. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb01804.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Baeesa SS, Dang T, Keene DL, Ventureyra EC. Unusual association of intractable temporal lobe seizures and intracranial aneurysms in an adolescent: is it a coincidence? Pediatr Neurosurg. 1998;28(4):198–203. doi: 10.1159/000028650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sena JC, Reynier Y, Alliez B. Unruptured intracranial aneurysm presenting with epiletic seizure. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003;61(3A):663–667. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2003000400026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Beghi E. The epidemiology of epilepsy. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(2):185–191. doi: 10.1159/000503831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sultana B, Panzini MA, Veilleux Carpentier A, et al. Incidence and prevalence of drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2021;96(17):805–817. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hirfanoglu T, Serdaroglu A, Kurt G, et al. Outcomes of resective surgery in children and adolescents with focal lesional epilepsy: the experience of a tertiary epilepsy center. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;63:67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. McClelland S, 3rd, Curran CC, Davey CS, Okuyemi KS. Intractable pediatric temporal lobe epilepsy in the United States: examination of race, age, sex, and insurance status as factors predicting receipt of resective treatment. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(6 Suppl):469–473. doi: 10.3171/PED-07/12/469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Gelinas JN, Battison AW, Smith S, Connolly MB, Steinbok P. Electrocorticography and seizure outcomes in children with lesional epilepsy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27(3):381–390. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1279-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Dallas J, Englot DJ, Naftel RP. Neurosurgical approaches to pediatric epilepsy: indications, techniques, and outcomes of common surgical procedures. Seizure. 2020;77:76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Dwivedi R, Ramanujam B, Chandra PS, et al. Surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy in children. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(17):1639–1647. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Englot DJ, Rolston JD, Wang DD, Sun PP, Chang EF, Auguste KI. Seizure outcomes after temporal lobectomy in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;12(2):134–141. doi: 10.3171/2013.5.PEDS12526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Titus JB, Lee A, Kasasbeh A, et al. Health-related quality of life before and after pediatric epilepsy surgery: the influence of seizure outcome on changes in physical functioning and social functioning. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;27(3):477–483. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Maragkos GA, Geropoulos G, Kechagias K, Ziogas IA, Mylonas KS. Quality of life after epilepsy surgery in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(6):741–749. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Mikati MA, Rahi AC, Shamseddine A, Mroueh S, Shoeib H, Comair Y. Marked benefits in physical activity and well-being, but not in functioning domains, 2 years after successful epilepsy surgery in children. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;12(1):145–149. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kim M, Lee HS, Lee S, et al. Pediatric intracranial aneurysms: favorable outcomes despite rareness and complexity. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e1203–e1216. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lu J, Li M, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Chen X, Zhao J. Paediatric intracranial aneurysms: long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes in a contemporary series. Front Neurol. 2022;13:684093. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.684093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Xu R, Xie ME, Yang W, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of pediatric intracranial aneurysms: comparison with an adult population in a 30-year, prospective database J Neurosurg Pediatr 2021;101–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Chen R, Zhang S, Xiao A, Guo R, Ma J. Risk factors for intracranial aneurysm rupture in pediatric patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022;164(4):1145–1152. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04957-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Levy ML, Levy DM, Manna B. Pediatric Cerebral Aneurysm. August 8, 2022. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537085/. Accessed March 1, 2023. [PubMed]
  • 35. Zhu Q, Liang Y, Fan Z, et al. The utility of intraoperative ECoG in tumor-related epilepsy: systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022;212:107054. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Yao PS, Zheng SF, Wang F, Kang DZ, Lin YX. Surgery guided with intraoperative electrocorticography in patients with low-grade glioma and refractory seizures. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(3):840–845. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Warsi NM, Mohammad AH, Zhang F, et al. Electrocorticography-guided resection enhances postoperative seizure freedom in low-grade tumor-associated epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2023;92(1):18–26. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Terra VC, Thomé U, Rosset SS, et al. Surgery for focal cortical dysplasia in children using intraoperative mapping. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30(11):1839–1851. doi: 10.1007/s00381-014-2459-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Andrews BT, Raffel C, Rosegay H. Subarachnoid hemorrhage from a peripheral intracranial aneurysm associated with malignant glioma: report of a case. Neurosurgery. 1985;17(4):645–649. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198510000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Taylor PE. Delayed postoperative hemorrhage from intracranial aneurysm after craniotomy for tumor. Neurology. 1961;11:225–231. doi: 10.1212/wnl.11.3.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Cheng WY, Shen CC. Minimally invasive approaches to treat simultaneous occurrence of glioblastoma multiforme and intracranial aneurysm—case report. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2004;47(3):181–185. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-818378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Licata C, Pasqualin A, Freschini A, Barone G, Da Pian R. Management of associated primary cerebral neoplasms and vascular malformations: 1. Intracranial aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1986;82(1-2):28–38. doi: 10.1007/BF01456316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Wei RJ, Wu XL, Xia F, Chen JC. Case report and literature review: treatment of multiple meningiomas combined with multiple unruptured aneurysms in a single operation. Front Surg. 2022;9:971068. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.971068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Ravussin P, de Tribolet N. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol for burst suppression in cerebral aneurysm surgery: preliminary report of 42 patients. Neurosurgery. 1993;32(2):236–240. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199302000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons are provided here courtesy of American Association of Neurological Surgeons

RESOURCES