Skip to main content
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1993 Mar;2(1):31–34. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.1.31

Assessing introduction of spinal anaesthesia for obstetric procedures.

T H Madej 1, I J Jackson 1, R G Wheatley 1, J Wilson 1
PMCID: PMC1055059  PMID: 10132076

Abstract

To assess the impact of introducing spinal anaesthesia for obstetric operative procedures on use of general anaesthesia and quality of regional anaesthesia in a unit with an established epidural service a retrospective analysis of routinely collected data on method of anaesthesia, efficacy, and complications was carried out. Data were collected from 1988 to 1991 on 1670 obstetric patients requiring an operative procedure. The introduction of spinal anaesthesia in 1989 significantly reduced the proportion of operative procedures performed under general anaesthesia, from 60% (234/390) in 1988 to 30% (124/414) in 1991. The decrease was most pronounced for manual removal of the placenta (88%, 48/55 v 9%, 3/34) and emergency caesarean section (67%, 129/193) v 38%, 87/229). Epidural anaesthesia decreased in use most significantly for elective caesarean section (65%, 77/118 v 3% 3/113; x2=139, p<0.0001). The incidence of severe pain and need for conversion to general anaesthesia was significantly less with spinal anaesthesia (0%, 0/207 v 3%, 5/156; p<0.05). Hypotension was not a problem, and the incidence of headache after spinal anaesthetic decreased over the period studied. Introducing spinal anaesthesia therefore reduced the need for general anaesthesia and improved the quality of regional anaesthesia.

Full text

PDF
31

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abouleish E., Rawal N., Fallon K., Hernandez D. Combined intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine for cesarean section. Anesth Analg. 1988 Apr;67(4):370–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cesarini M., Torrielli R., Lahaye F., Mene J. M., Cabiro C. Sprotte needle for intrathecal anaesthesia for caesarean section: incidence of postdural puncture headache. Anaesthesia. 1990 Aug;45(8):656–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14392.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Flaatten H., Rodt S., Rosland J., Vamnes J. Postoperative headache in young patients after spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1987 Feb;42(2):202–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb03001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Naulty J. S., Hertwig L., Hunt C. O., Datta S., Ostheimer G. W., Weiss J. B. Influence of local anesthetic solution on postdural puncture headache. Anesthesiology. 1990 Mar;72(3):450–454. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199003000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stevens J. D., Braithwaite P., Corke C. F., Madej T. H., Wheatley R. G. Double-blind comparison of epidural diamorphine and intramuscular morphine after elective caesarean section, with computerised analysis of continuous pulse oximetry. Anaesthesia. 1991 Apr;46(4):256–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb11491.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Terry B. R. Planning for long-term care. Caring. 1988 Mar;7(3):30-3, 65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES