Skip to main content
Vaccine: X logoLink to Vaccine: X
. 2023 Sep 26;15:100394. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100394

Estimation of cutoff score for the 7C of vaccination readiness scale

Masaki Machida a,b,, Tomoko Takamiya a, Yuko Odagiri a, Noritoshi Fukushima a, Hiroyuki Kikuchi a, Shigeru Inoue a
PMCID: PMC10550591  PMID: 37808267

Highlights

  • Cutoff score for the 7C of the vaccination readiness scale was clarified.

  • Receiver operating characteristic analysis calculated full and short survey scores.

  • Vaccination readiness score over 4 indicates a willingness to be vaccinated.

Keywords: Vaccine hesitancy, Vaccine acceptance, Measurement, Questionnaire, Cutoff score

Abstract

The 7C of the vaccination readiness scale provides a score to evaluate the willingness and readiness to get vaccinated (vaccination readiness). This cross-sectional study clarifies the cutoff vaccination readiness score to determine whether an individual is willing to be vaccinated. We conducted an online survey of 774 participants. The vaccination readiness scores for the full and short survey versions were calculated. The coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination status was used to determine whether the participant was willing to be vaccinated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed using the Youden index. The Youden Index was at its maximum when the cutoff score was 4.02 for the full version (area under the curve [AUC]:0.94) and 4.07 for the short version (AUC:0.90). Vaccination readiness scores greater than 4 on both the full and short version may indicate a willingness to be vaccinated. This cutoff value facilitates the interpretation of the 7C scale results.

1. Introduction

Vaccine hesitancy has become a global public health concern [1]. Various scales have been developed to evaluate thoughts and intentions regarding vaccines [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Among them, the 7C of vaccination readiness scale (7C scale) has recently received significant attention [7]. It is a numerical scale that evaluates willingness and readiness to be vaccinated (i.e., vaccination readiness) alongside seven psychological components relevant to vaccination readiness (confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, collective responsibility, compliance, and conspiracy). Individuals with higher vaccination readiness scores, calculated from the seven psychological components of vaccine readiness, are generally more likely to be vaccinated than those with lower scores. However, it is unclear what the cutoff score should be to determine whether an individual is willing to be vaccinated. When the cutoff score is identified, it is possible to assess the presence or absence of vaccination readiness as a binary category (i.e., high or low). It makes the evaluation of the 7C scale results easier to understand and more useful for promoting public awareness (e.g., revealing the proportion of citizens with high vaccine readiness).

Therefore, this study clarified the cutoff score of vaccination readiness on the 7C scale using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine whether an individual is willing to be vaccinated.

2. Methods

2.1. Study sample and data collection

This cross-sectional study was conducted through an Internet-based survey in Japan. We utilized the datasets collected in a study on the development and validity of the Japanese version of the 7C scale, which comprised 1000 participants [8]. Participants were recruited from among the registrants of a Japanese Internet research service company called iBRIDGE Corporation, which had approximately 4.5 million registered participants at the time of the study. The Internet research service company invited their registered participants to take the survey via their website accounts on March 9, 2022. The detailed sample collection method we used has previously been reported elsewhere [8]. The inclusion criteria for this study were 1) registrants of the Internet research service company, 2) people over 20 years of age, and 3) those who responded to the survey. The exclusion criteria were 1) people who responded in a short time (≤1 min) and 2) those with identical answers to the 21 items of the 7C scale. The method we used is a means through which survey satisficing behavior (e.g., not responding after careful consideration of each item or choosing identical answers) is identified from the data collected in an online survey [9], [10].

This study was approved by the ethics committee of our university in Tokyo, Japan (no: T2021-0265). Informed consent was obtained from all respondents after the nature of the study had been fully explained.

2.2. Vaccination readiness score

The 7C scale has a full version with three items for each of the seven questions (a total of 21 questions) and a short version with one item for each of the seven questions (a total of seven questions) [7]. The questionnaire is shown in Supplementary Table 1. In this study, the participants were asked to respond to the Japanese full version of the 7C scale, and the full and short versions were each subjected to separate analyses. Responses to each item were rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale. Each question was coded, with higher scores indicating greater levels of vaccination readiness (score range: 1–7). The total mean score indicates a participant's vaccination readiness score [11].

2.3. COVID-19 vaccination status

As the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine booster had begun at the time of the survey, the COVID-19 vaccine was the main topic of discussion among citizens [12], [13], [14]. Therefore, this study established participants’ COVID-19 vaccination status as a criterion for their willingness to be vaccinated. The participants were asked how many times they had received the COVID-19 vaccine. At the time of the survey, approximately 75 % of the people had received the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccination in Japan [13], [14], implying that most people who wanted to be vaccinated had received the second dose. Meanwhile, the booster vaccination coverage was approximately 30 %, and it was rising daily [13], [14], indicating that although some people wanted the booster shot, they had not received it yet at the time of the survey; thus, they were considered as not vaccinated. Therefore, in this study, those who had received more than two doses of vaccination were defined as willing to be vaccinated.

2.4. Sociodemographic factors

Each of the participants reported their level of educational attainment. The categorized data provided by the research company comprised information regarding sex, age, and employment status.

2.5. Statistical analysis

ROC curve analysis was performed using the Youden Index [15]. The cutoff value of the vaccination readiness score, which determined whether participants were willing to be vaccinated, was clarified. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were reported. Based on previous studies [16], the AUC values were interpreted as excellent (≥0.90), good (0.80–0.89), fair (0.70–0.79), and poor (<0.70).

R version 4.2.0 and “pROC” from the R package were used to perform all statistical analyses.

3. Results

In this survey, 1,000 participants responded to the questionnaire. The mean response time to the questionnaire in the survey was 2 min and 40 s. Of the participants, 226 were excluded for the following reasons: response time ≤ 1 min (n = 203), and identical answers were chosen for the 21 items of the 7C scale (n = 23). Therefore, the analysis set comprised 774 participants (Table 1).

Table 1.

Participants’ characteristics.

Participants: n = 774
n (%) mean (SD)
Sex (men) 296 (38.2 %)
Age, years 53.2 (16.5)
Educational attainment
 University graduate or above 325 (42.0 %)
 Below university graduate level 449 (58.0 %)
Employment status
 Working 415 (53.6 %)
 Not working 359 (46.4 %)
COVID-19 vaccination status, number of vaccine doses
 0–1 125 (16.1 %)
 2–3 649 (83.9 %)
7C scale
 Vaccination Readiness Score (full version) 4.48 (0.84)
 Vaccination Readiness Score (short version) 4.40 (0.95)

Note. SD; standard deviation.

Fig. 1 presents the results of the ROC curve analysis. In the 7C scale full version, when the cutoff value was 4.02, the Youden Index reached the maximum (Youden Index = 0.72, sensitivity = 86.9 %, specificity = 84.8 %, AUC = 0.94) [Fig. 1 (A)]. In the 7C scale short version, when the cutoff value was 4.07, the Youden Index reached its maximum (Youden Index = 0.64, sensitivity = 76.3 %, specificity = 87.2 %, AUC = 0.90) (Fig. 1 (B)).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for the cutoff value of the vaccination readiness score that determines whether an individual is willing to be vaccinated.

4. Discussion

We set out to clarify the cutoff value of the vaccination readiness score of the 7C scale to determine whether an individual is willing to be vaccinated. ROC curve analysis suggested that the full and short version vaccination readiness scores of 4.02 and 4.07 or higher, respectively, could be used to indicate a willingness to be vaccinated. Considering the range of values that can be obtained for the vaccination readiness score, an individual can be considered willing to be vaccinated if the score is over 4.00 for either the full or short version.

The 7C scale is unique as it can comprehensively assess various psychological factors related to willingness and readiness to be vaccinated. Several recent studies on vaccine hesitancy have used the 7C scale [17], [18], [19], [20]. However, absolute criteria, such as cutoff values, were not clear. This study demonstrated that it is possible to determine cutoff values with acceptable sensitivity and specificity for determining whether the willingness to be vaccinated exists in the vaccination readiness score of the 7C scale.

Some limitations should be considered in our study. First, participants were recruited from a single Internet research company. Therefore, the results may not be generalizable to all populations, such as older adults who do not use the Internet. Second, the COVID-19 vaccination status may have affected the vaccination readiness score, owing to the cross-sectional nature of our study. The experience of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine may increase confidence in it and increase vaccination readiness scores, or vice versa. Further longitudinal studies are required to confirm these effects. Third, our results may not be generalizable. Vaccine hesitancy sometimes varies across places and types of vaccines [21]. The cutoff values of vaccination readiness scores may differ for other vaccines or populations. Despite these limitations, our study provides novel evidence that the 7C scale may provide an acceptable cutoff value for vaccination readiness score for determining whether an individual is willing to be vaccinated. Our results suggest that the 7C scale alone can provide a comprehensive determination of both willingness to be vaccinated and the respondents’ thoughts about vaccination, which makes this scale more convenient in the field.

5. Conclusion

On both the full and short versions of the 7C scale, vaccination readiness scores over 4 may indicate a willingness to be vaccinated. Consequently, this cutoff value facilitates the interpretation of the results of the 7C scale and helps when considering education campaigns regarding vaccine hesitancy utilizing the 7C scale.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the participants enrolled in this study.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan (no: T2021-0265). Informed consent was obtained from all the respondents.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100394.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.docx (30.6KB, docx)

Data availability

The authors do not have permission to share data.

References

  • 1.de Figueiredo A., Simas C., Karafillakis E., Paterson P., Larson H.J. Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: A large-scale retrospective temporal modeling study. Lancet. 2020;396:898–908. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31558-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Opel D.J., Taylor J.A., Zhou C., Catz S., Myaing M., Mangione-Smith R. The relationship between parent attitudes about childhood vaccines survey scores and future child immunization status: A validation study. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167:1065–1071. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gilkey M.B., Reiter P.L., Magnus B.E., McRee A.L., Dempsey A.F., Brewer N.T. Validation of the vaccination confidence scale: A brief measure to identify parents at risk for refusing adolescent vaccines. Acad Pediatr. 2016;16:42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Frew P.M., Murden R., Mehta C.C., Chamberlain A.T., Hinman A.R., Nowak G., et al. Development of a US trust measure to assess and monitor parental confidence in the vaccine system. Vaccine. 2019;37:325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sarathchandra D., Navin M.C., Largent M.A., McCright A.M. A survey instrument for measuring vaccine acceptance. Prev Med. 2018;109:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Larson H.J., Jarrett C., Schulz W.S., Chaudhuri M., Zhou Y., Dube E., et al. Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool. Vaccine. 2015;33:4165–4175. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Geiger M., Rees F., Lilleholt L., Santana A.P., Zettler I., Wilhelm O., et al. Measuring the 7Cs of vaccination readiness. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2022;38:261–269. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000663. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Machida M., Kojima T., Popiel H.A., Geiger M., Odagiri Y., Inoue S. Development, validity, and reliability of the Japanese version of the 7C of vaccination readiness scale. Am J Infect Control. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hamby T., Taylor W. Survey satisficing inflates reliability and validity measures: An experimental comparison of college and Amazon Mechanical Turk samples. Educ Psychol Meas. 2016;76:912–932. doi: 10.1177/0013164415627349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maniaci M.R., Rogge R.D. Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. J Res Pers. 2014;48:61–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Geiger M, Rees F, Lilleholt L, Santana AP, Zettler I, Wilhelm O, et al. 7C basic analysis, https://www.vaccination-readiness.com/example_analysis.html [accessed 5 August 2023].
  • 12.Hannah Ritchie EM, Rodés-Guirao L, Appel C, Giattino C, Ortiz-Ospina E, Hasell J, et al. Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus; 2020 [accessed 5 August 2023].
  • 13.Our world in data. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations, https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations; 2020 [accessed 5 August 2023].
  • 14.Digital agency, Japan. COVID-19 vaccine status [Japanese], https://info.vrs.digital.go.jp/dashboard; 2023 [accessed 5 August 2023].
  • 15.Youden W.J. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3:32–35. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1&#x0003c;32::aid-cncr2820030106&#x0003e;3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Metz C.E. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 1978;8:283–298. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2998(78)80014-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Andrade G., Bedewy D., Bani I. Motivational factors to receive the COVID-19 vaccine in the United Arab Emirates: A cross-sectional study. J Community Health. 2022;47:530–538. doi: 10.1007/s10900-022-01084-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gagneux-Brunon A., Dauby N., Launay O., Botelho-Nevers E. Attitudes toward monkeypox vaccination among healthcare workers in France and Belgium: A part of complacency? J Hosp Infect. 2022;130:144–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Krakowczyk J.B., Bäuerle A., Pape L., Kaup T., Nulle L., Teufel M., et al. COVID-19 vaccine for children: Vaccination willingness of parents and its associated factors-A network analysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2022;10:1155. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10071155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tokiya M., Hara M., Matsumoto A., Ashenagar M.S., Nakano T., Hirota Y. Acceptance of booster COVID-19 vaccine and its association with components of vaccination readiness in the general population: A cross-sectional survey for starting booster dose in Japan. Vaccines (Basel) 2022;10:1102. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10071102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.MacDonald N.E. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015;33:4161–4164. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.docx (30.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The authors do not have permission to share data.


Articles from Vaccine: X are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES