Abstract
Introduction
While most patients with triple negative breast cancer receive radiation therapy to improve outcomes, a significant subset of patients continue to experience recurrence. Macrophage infiltration into radiation-damaged sites has been shown to promote breast cancer recurrence in pre-clinical models. However, the mechanisms that drive recurrence are unknown. Here, we developed a novel spheroid model to evaluate macrophage-mediated tumor cell recruitment.
Methods
We characterized infiltrating macrophage phenotypes into irradiated mouse mammary tissue via flow cytometry. We then engineered a spheroid model of radiation damage with primary fibroblasts, macrophages, and 4T1 mouse mammary carcinoma cells using in vivo macrophage infiltration results to inform our model. We analyzed 4T1 infiltration into spheroids when co-cultured with biologically relevant ratios of pro-healing M2:pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages. Finally, we quantified interleukin 6 (IL-6) secretion associated with conditions favorable to tumor cell infiltration, and we directly evaluated the impact of IL-6 on tumor cell invasiveness in vitro and in vivo.
Results
In our in vivo model, we observed a significant increase in M2 macrophages in mouse mammary glands 10 days post-irradiation. We determined that tumor cell motility toward irradiated spheroids was enhanced in the presence of a 2:1 ratio of M2:M1 macrophages. We also measured a significant increase in IL-6 secretion after irradiation both in vivo and in our model. This secretion increased tumor cell invasiveness, and tumor cell invasion and recruitment were mitigated by neutralizing IL-6.
Conclusions
Our work suggests that interactions between infiltrating macrophages and damaged stromal cells facilitate breast cancer recurrence through IL-6 signaling.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-023-00775-x.
Keywords: Macrophage-stromal interactions, Interleukin 6, Triple negative breast cancer, Irradiation, Tumor cell recruitment, Spheroid
Introduction
Almost 300,000 American women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in 2022 [1], and approximately 15% of those patients will have triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), a particularly aggressive subtype. To treat this disease, patients elect to undergo chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy (RT) [2]. RT typically produces positive outcomes for a majority of patients [3, 4]. However, an emerging body of literature implicates RT in contributing to cancer recurrence. Up to 20% of patients will experience locoregional recurrence after RT, and this may be correlated to patient immune status [2, 5–7]. Lymphopenia, or low lymphocyte count, has been identified as a risk factor for worse clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients [8]. Chemotherapy and RT can cause lymphopenia and immune dysfunction [9], and lymphopenia is correlated with lower overall survival after therapy [10]. This suggests that a significant number of TNBC patients may benefit from additions to their therapeutic regime.
The impact of normal tissue radiation damage on cancer recurrence is currently understudied. Previous pre-clinical studies have linked radiation to tumor spread. For example, irradiation of mammary stroma induced breast cancer in injected epithelial cells [11]. However, radiation damage alone does not dictate recurrence. Radiation-induced metastasis of TNBC cells to the lung was shown to be facilitated by macrophages [12]. Pre-irradiation of tumor beds led to myeloid cell infiltration and then tumor cell growth due to matrix degradation [13]. More recently, macrophages were shown to promote tumor cell recruitment following normal tissue radiation damage under lymphopenic conditions [6]. However, the contribution of stromal-macrophage interactions to breast cancer recurrence following normal tissue radiation remains unknown.
Spheroid models provide an avenue to determine mechanisms of recurrence [14], and their increased biological relevance compared to monolayer studies allows for insights into cell movement, direct cell-cell interactions, and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions [15–17]. Spheroid models complement in vivo models, and they serve as a crucial tool to design well-controlled and robust studies. Here, we developed a novel primary fibroblast spheroid model to evaluate the effect of radiation damage on stromal-macrophage interactions that drive recurrence. We first characterized in vivo macrophage infiltration to inform our model parameters. We then used our spheroid model to determine the contributions of irradiated normal tissue and macrophage infiltration to TNBC recurrence.
Results and Discussion
In Vivo Characterization of Infiltrating Macrophages and Cytokine Secretion Resulting from Radiation Damage
We characterized the phenotypes of macrophages that infiltrated irradiated mouse mammary fat pads (MFPs) in a model of radiation-induced recurrence (Fig. 1A) [6]. In this model, an orthotopic tumor provides the source of circulating tumor cells while the contralateral normal MFP is irradiated to isolate the effect RT on tumor cell recruitment from surgery and chemotherapy. A single dose of 20 Gy was used in our study as this regimen has been shown to be effective and safe in clinical trials for breast cancer therapy [18], and this dose has previously been used to induce tumor cell recruitment and immune cell infiltration in pre-clinical models [13, 19]. We defined macrophage (CD45+CD11b+F4/80+) phenotypes as follows: as cells expressing high expression of iNOS, CD86, CD64, or MHCII for pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages and IL4Rα, Arg-1, CD206, or IL-10 for pro-healing M2 macrophages [20–22]. We observed no increase in M1 macrophage infiltration 10 days post-RT. However, a significant increase in M2 macrophage infiltration was observed with tumor cell recruitment (Fig. 1B, Fig. S1C, D). In TNBC patients, higher numbers of tumor associated macrophages typically with an M2 phenotype are correlated with poorer prognosis [23]. Expression of CD163, an M2 marker, in breast tumors was linked to increased likelihood of early distant recurrence and decreased overall survival [24]. Additionally, it has been shown that M2 macrophages play a role in radiation-induced recurrence in other cancers. For example, expression of CD163 in primary head and neck cancer tumors is associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence after RT [25].
Fig. 1.
M2 macrophage infiltration and secreted inflammatory cytokines are increased following in vivo RT of mammary tissue. A Experimental schematic of in vivo normal tissue irradiation studies. B Flow cytometry characterization of M1 and M2 macrophage infiltration into MFPs 10 days post-20 Gy RT. C Volcano plot of relative change in cytokines in irradiated MFPs. Differences were calculated by normalizing cytokine median fluorescence intensity values 10 days post-RT to values from non-irradiated CD8 + T cell-reduced mice with no tumor. D Volcano plot of relative change in cytokines in serum samples. Error bars show standard error of the mean with **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 as determined by a two-tailed unpaired t-test
Because communication between damaged tissue and immune cells is essential to the wound healing response, we evaluated how local and systemic cytokine expression influenced tumor cell recruitment in Balb/C mice with antibody-reduced CD8+ T cells to model lymphopenic patients. Cytokine secretion 10 days post-RT from MFP homogenates and mouse serum was evaluated using a Luminex multiplex immunoassay. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) values were normalized to those obtained from mice without tumor cell infiltration or RT. MFPs with tumor cell infiltration post-RT exhibited greater than a 2-fold increase in interleukin 6 (IL-6) and IL-23, and more than a 3-fold increase in transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) relative to a mouse without tumor cell infiltration (Fig. 1C). Additionally, increases in IL-6 expression were observed systemically (Fig. 1D). Increased levels of IL-6 in serum are associated with higher risk of early recurrence and bone metastasis [26]. Although IL-6 is typically known as a pro-inflammatory cytokine [27], it has also been shown to promote TNBC epithelial-mesenchymal transition, progression, cancer stemness, and M2 macrophage polarization [28]. The role of M2 secreted IL-6 as a response to neuroinflammation may be similar to the response of M2 macrophages of a radiation-damaged normal tissue microenvironment [29]. Together, these data indicate that IL-6 influences the recruitment of circulating tumor cells in vivo.
Primary Fibroblast Spheroid Model
The stroma in the mammary gland is made up of a heterogeneous collection of fibroblasts, which have been implicated in promoting recurrence post-radiation [6]. As RT does not spare normal tissues in patients [30], we developed a breast-mimetic spheroid model to specifically evaluate the contributions of cells derived from the mammary stromal vascular fraction (SVF) to tumor cell recruitment after radiation damage. Within 16 h of plating in U-bottom low-adhesion plates, cells isolated from the SVF formed spheroids of approximately 300 µm in diameter (Fig. 2A), a size that is below the threshold where hypoxia and necrosis may occur [14, 31]. This technique allows for well-controlled fibroblast spheroids that replicate the breast microenvironment. Surface markers of primary SVF cells were evaluated. The isolated cells expressed high and consistent levels of platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRꞵ), Podoplanin, and CD90.2/Thy1.2 (Fig. 2B, Fig. S2A). Expression of these markers have been shown in both healthy mammary glands and in mammary glands containing cancer associated fibroblasts [32, 33]. There was negligible expression of immune, epithelial, and endothelial markers (Fig. 2B, Fig. S2B), implying that this model is composed primarily of fibroblasts. Fibroblasts produce ECM components, and radiation induces fibrosis, which results in excess ECM production [34, 35]. Previous studies have incorporated primary fibroblasts into spheroids [36]; however, we are the first to study the effects of irradiation on spheroid behavior.
Fig. 2.
Design of primary mammary spheroids. A Experimental schematic of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) isolation from mouse MFPs, expansion, and irradiation. Brightfield image of representative spheroid. Scale bar is 100 µm. B SVF cells are composed of cells of fibroblast lineage based on flow cytometry characterization. Data is presented as a box and whiskers plot, with the minimum, maximum, first quartile, median, and third quartile shown. C SVF cells show negligible expression of immune, epithelial, and endothelial cell markers. D Spheroid-macrophage (2:1 M2:M1) co-culture facilitates enhanced expression of MMP9. Representative images of immunofluorescence staining of nuclei (blue), F4/80 + macrophages (green), and MMP9 (red) in spheroids 3 days post-RT. MMP9 fluorescence intensity was quantified using Fiji and normalized to 0 Gy for each time point (n = 3). Scale bars are 200 μm. E Analysis of secreted MMP9 in conditioned media containing macrophages (macs) alone or co-cultured with control (0 Gy) or irradiated (20 Gy) spheroids. Error bars show standard error of the mean with *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 as determined by ANOVA
The Irradiated Microenvironment Facilitates TNBC Cell Recruitment Through Direct Spheroid–Macrophage Interactions
Radiation induces significant infiltration of macrophages in normal mammary tissue, and excess macrophages can cause tumor growth, metastasis, and recurrence [6, 37]. We added primary mouse bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) to our spheroid model to study how macrophage infiltration influences tumor cell behavior. Other studies have modeled macrophage infiltration using multiple tissue types [38]. Based on the flow cytometry results in our in vivo studies, we added macrophages at a proportion of 15% of the overall cells, and M0, M1, and M2 macrophages (Fig. S3) made up 85%, 5%, and 10% of the macrophage population, respectively. This distribution was chosen to mimic the proportion of iNOS and Arg-1 expressing cells measured in the MFP due to the widespread use of these markers in identifying M1 and M2 macrophages, respectively (Fig. 1B). To replicate in vivo observations of macrophage infiltration [6], macrophages were added immediately after irradiation (Fig. S2C, D). Using scanning electron microscopy, we observed adhesion and infiltration of macrophages and 4T1s into spheroids after irradiation (Fig. S4A). Macrophage co-culture and irradiation did not cause any significant differences in spheroid size or aspect ratio (Fig. S4B). We confirmed infiltration of M1 and M2 macrophages into spheroids after 24 h (Fig. S4C).
In normal tissue, macrophages have been shown to secrete matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) to facilitate fibrosis [39], myocardial infarction [40], and the wound healing process in burns [41]. MMP9 stimulates primary TNBC tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis [42], but the contribution of macrophages to local secretion of MMP9 in the irradiated microenvironment to recurrence is relatively unexplored. We observed enhanced MMP9 expression in spheroids when co-cultured with macrophages 3 days following RT (Fig. 2D), and MMP9 secretion was elevated by co-culture of spheroids and macrophages independent of RT (Fig. 2E). This suggests that upon infiltration, macrophages facilitate ECM degradation through MMP9 secretion that may further prime the microenvironment for 4T1 invasion.
We also confirmed that 4T1 murine TNBC cells infiltrated into spheroids (Fig. S4D). We tracked individual cell infiltration via live cell imaging (Fig. 3A). When GFP-positive 4T1 cells were co-cultured with macrophages in irradiated spheroids, they showed significantly higher motility toward the center of the spheroid. Interestingly, 4T1 cells showed lower motility toward the center of unirradiated co-cultures, implying that direct contact between irradiated stroma and macrophages may act in synergy to facilitate motility. GFP intensity in the inner core of the spheroid was normalized to the overall GFP intensity of the spheroid after 24 h of infiltration (Fig. 3B). In the case of 2:1 M2:M1 macrophages co-cultured with irradiated spheroids and tumor cells, interior GFP intensity significantly increased, indicating that 4T1 cells were more invasive when cultured in spheroids that recapitulate a microenvironment that has been shown to promote tumor cell recruitment in vivo [6]. This ratio of macrophages was chosen to reproduce our in vivo results showing an approximate two-fold increase in M2 macrophages post-irradiation (Fig. 1B). Additionally, GFP intensity was measured as a function of radial distance from the center (Fig. 3C). After 72 h of co-culture, GFP intensity closer to the interior of the spheroid was significantly increased in irradiated spheroids with macrophages relative to both the stromal only irradiated and unirradiated controls. These results show that direct interactions between macrophages and the irradiated stroma facilitate 4T1 recruitment. Macrophages maintained relevant levels of expression of M1 (CD86) markers and M2 (IL4Rα) markers for up to 4 days within the co-culture (Fig. S4E).
Fig. 3.
Tumor cell infiltration into spheroids is enhanced by co-culture of irradiated stroma and infiltrating macrophages. A GFP-labeled 4T1 TNBC cell infiltration was tracked at 24- and 72-h following co-culture with control (0 Gy) or irradiated (20 Gy) spheroids with or without 2:1 M2:M1 macrophages. Infiltration was enhanced in the presence of 2:1 M2:M1 macrophages co-cultured with irradiated spheroids. White arrows indicate cell infiltration. Scale bars are 200 μm. B GFP intensity increases with macrophage co-culture as a function of radial distance at 72 h post-RT. C GFP signal from 4T1s is enhanced in the interior of the spheroid post-RT when co-cultured with macrophages (n = 3-4 biological replicates). Interior spheroid GFP intensity was normalized to the total GFP intensity within the entire spheroid at 24 h of co-culture. Error bars show standard error of the mean with *p < 0.05 as determined by a two-tailed unpaired t-test
IL-6 Secretion Drives 4T1 Cell Invasiveness
We isolated conditioned media (CM) from co-cultures of macrophages and irradiated spheroids. We characterized IL-6 secretion from spheroids as a function of irradiation and macrophage infiltration to determine whether in vivo cytokine secretion is replicated in our model. We observed that infiltration of macrophages (2:1 M2:M1) resulted in a significantly higher secretion of IL-6 relative to spheroids with no macrophage infiltration (Fig. 4A). Additionally, when macrophages were co-cultured with unirradiated spheroids, we observed no significant changes in IL-6 secretion. Interestingly, the co-culture of M0 macrophages with irradiated spheroids did not change IL-6 secretion (Fig. S5A). These observations establish the importance of maximizing biological relevance by incorporating multiple macrophage phenotypes into spheroid models. The impact of IL-6 on 4T1 invasiveness was then investigated using a transwell assay. 4T1 invasiveness was significantly higher when incubated with CM from irradiated spheroids with macrophages relative to CM collected from spheroids with no macrophages (Fig. 4B), and neutralization of IL-6 in CM resulted in nearly fourfold reduction in invasiveness of 4T1 cells. Invasion was also significantly lower in CM from unirradiated spheroids co-cultured with macrophages. Previous studies have shown that neutralization of IL-6 reduces invasiveness of 4T1 cells and that macrophage-derived IL-6 contributes to tumor cell migratory ability [43, 44]. However, we are the first to show the dependence of 4T1 invasiveness on IL-6 secreted from stromal-macrophage interactions.
Fig. 4.
IL-6 secretion drives tumor cell recruitment and invasion post-RT. A Spheroid conditioned media (CM) incubated for 24 h after RT promotes IL-6 secretion when cultured with a 2:1 ratio of M2:M1 macrophages (green). IL-6 secretion is lower in the absence of spheroid RT (black), with spheroid RT and no macrophage infiltration (red), or with macrophage co-culture without RT (gray). B IL-6 secreted from RT spheroids co-cultured with macrophages promotes 4T1 cell invasion. IL-6 neutralization (αIL-6, striped green) in CM of irradiated spheroids with macrophage co-culture diminished invasion. Error bars show standard error of the mean with *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 as determined by ANOVA analysis. 20 Gy (solid green) and IL-6 spiked media (striped black) are statistically significant compared to all other conditions. C IL-6 neutralization in vivo reduces 4T1 cell recruitment after irradiation. Luminescence from migrating cells was normalized to the unirradiated control for each treatment (IgG1, α-IL-6). Error bars show standard error of the mean with **p < 0.01 as determined by two-tailed unpaired t-test. D Proposed mechanism of 4T1 tumor cell infiltration following normal tissue RT
We then investigated the impact of IL-6 on tumor cell recruitment in vivo. IL-6 was systemically neutralized in immunocompromised mice 6 h before irradiation of contralateral MFPs in mice with orthotopic luciferase-labeled 4T1 tumors, and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) was used to quantify the luminescent signal from recruited tumor cells in MFPs. For each treatment, BLI was normalized to the non-irradiated control (IgG1, αIL-6). Systemic depletion of IL-6 significantly reduced BLI levels after RT (p < 0.01; Fig. 4C), indicating inhibition of tumor cell recruitment. Taken together, these data suggest that the interaction between tissue damaged from RT and M2 and M1 macrophages causes secretion of IL-6 that in turn recruits 4T1 cells (Fig. 4D). IL-6 depletion was not observed to have significant off-target effects, including effects on mouse weight, primary tumor growth, or metastasis, suggesting that this mechanism may be more specific to local recurrence (Fig. S5B-E).
Tumor-derived IL-6 autocrine signaling has been shown to contribute to colony formation, tumor growth, and immune suppression [45, 46]. Despite its potential as an attractive target, clinical studies of IL-6 inhibitors have been largely unsuccessful at preventing progression of primary disease, showing little efficacy in multiple myeloma, renal cell carcinoma, and prostate cancer [47]. Myeloid-derived IL-6 has been reported in 4T1 progression and metastasis [44, 48], and inhibition of IL-6R has been shown to hinder TNBC metastasis in a pre-clinical model [49]. However, there is limited knowledge of the clinical efficacy of IL-6 and IL-6R inhibitors in primary breast cancer progression and recurrence [50]. The discrepancies in efficacy of IL-6 targeted treatments could be due to differences in the source of IL-6 as well as the microenvironment exposed to the cytokine. Because IL-6 targeted therapies have been quite successful at treating various rheumatic, auto-immune, and inflammatory diseases, it is worth exploring further in the context of a fibrotic normal tissue response to radiation damage in the TNBC recurrence cascade [51].
This is the first report of IL-6 driving 4T1 invasiveness post-RT in the context of local recurrence. This work highlights the importance of using 3D spheroid models to elucidate mechanisms of breast cancer recurrence. Our results indicate that monitoring serum IL-6 levels may provide prognostic and therapeutic value in improving outcomes for TNBC patients vulnerable to recurrence.
Methods
Cell Lines
Luciferase-labeled and GFP expressing 4T1 mouse mammary carcinoma cells were obtained from Dr. Laura L. Bronsart (Stanford University). All cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2. 4T1 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin). Cells were used within three passages before injection into mice.
Orthotopic Tumor Studies
Animal studies were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines and animal protocols approved by the Vanderbilt University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Tumor inoculation was performed by injecting 5 × 104 4T1 cells in a volume of 50 μL of sterile PBS into the number four inguinal right MFPs of 8- to 10-week old female Nu/Nu or Balb/C mice (Charles River Laboratories). In CD8+ T cell reduction experiments, 0.5 mg anti-CD8a (2.43; BioXCell) was injected intraperitoneally every 5 days starting from the day of inoculation [6]. Control mice were injected with 0.5 mg rat IgG2b isotype control (LTF-2; BioXCell) using the same dosing schedule. In IL-6 depletion experiments, 0.5 mg anti-IL6 (BioXCell) was injected intraperitoneally in Nu/Nu mice starting 6 h before irradiation, then every 3 days afterward. Control mice were injected with 0.5 mg IgG1 isotype control antibody (BioXCell). Tumor length and width were measured using digital calipers (Fisher Scientific) beginning one week after tumor inoculation. Tumor volume was calculated as follows: Volume = (L12 × L2)/2, where L1 is the smaller diameter of the tumor, and L2 is the larger diameter [6].
Luminex Multiplex Cytokine Assay
To assess cytokine profiles at the local site of infiltration, MFPs were harvested and homogenized in 20 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.5) buffer with 0.5% Tween 20, 150 mM NaCl, and protease inhibitor, centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C, and supernatant was stored at − 80 °C [52]. Protein content was measured using bicinchoninic acid protein assay (ThermoFisher). For evaluation of systemic cytokine signaling, blood samples were collected via retro-orbital bleed, allowed to clot at room temperature for 30 min, then centrifuged for 10 min. Serum was then recovered and stored at − 80 °C. Samples were processed at the Stanford Human Immune Monitoring Center using a mouse 39-plex Affymetrix kit. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) values were normalized to total protein concentrations, p-values were calculated using two-tailed unpaired t-tests comparing MFIs from unirradiated, immunocompromised mice to values 10 days post-RT, and the MFI values at 10 days post-RT were normalized to those evaluated pre-irradiation to determine the fold change. The data were visualized using volcano plots.
Primary Spheroid Generation
Spheroids were generated from primary cells obtained from the SVF in mouse MFPs using previously published techniques [36]. Briefly, MFPs were harvested and minced with a blade and digested for 40 min in a solution of PBS with 20 ug/mL liberase, and antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin). Tissue was flushed through a 100 µm filter and plated in 10 cm dishes in DMEM/20% BCS. Upon confluence, cells were plated in low adhesion U-bottom plates at a density of 10,000 cells/spheroid. Spheroids were formed within 24 h of passaging.
Radiation
Radiation was delivered by two methods. For in vivo RT, mice were anesthetized by administering isoflurane and irradiated to 20 Gy using a 300 kVp cabinet x-ray system filtered with 0.5 mm Cu. The mice were shielded using a Cerrobend jig with apertures 1 cm wide and 1.5 cm long to expose normal MFPs. Transmission through the 2 cm thick shield was less than 1%. For in vitro experiments, spheroids were irradiated in U-bottom low adhesion plates to 20 Gy using a Cesium source.
Bioluminescence Imaging (BLI)
BLI was performed to evaluate tumor cell recruitment post-RT [6, 19]. All BLI was done using the IVIS Spectrum imaging system (PerkinElmer). Mice bearing luciferase-expressing tumors were injected intraperitoneally with 3.3 mg D-luciferin (Biosynth Chemistry & Biology) in PBS 10 min prior to imaging. Ex vivo imaging was performed after euthanizing mice and harvesting MFPs, and total flux [p/s] was measured.
Flow Cytometry
MFPs were harvested and minced in a solution of 1% FBS in PBS. They were then placed in a 2 mg/mL solution of Collagenase II (Sigma) and incubated for 30 min in a water bath at 37 °C. The digestion was inactivated by adding 1% FBS in PBS. The digested tissue was then passed through a 100 µm filter to generate a single cell suspension. Cells were stained with the Aqua fixable viability stain (ThermoFisher) and FC receptors were blocked with CD16/32 (Biolegend) simultaneously with other cell surface markers for 20 min at 4 °C. After staining, cells were rinsed with PBS and fixed with 1% neutral buffered formalin in saline for at least 20 min at 4 °C. Intracellular stains were performed using an intracellular permeabilization buffer (ThermoFisher). Fixed cells were rinsed with PBS for 5 min, rinsed with permeabilization buffer for five minutes, then incubated with antibodies diluted in permeabilization buffer for thirty minutes at room temperature in the dark. Cells were then rinsed with permeabilization buffer and resuspended in PBS. Flow cytometry was performed on a four-laser Amnis CellStream machine (Luminex), and FlowJo software was used for analysis. Compensations were obtained by using compensation beads (ThermoFisher). The following antibody clones were used for analysis: CD45 (30-F11), CD11b (M1/70), F4/80 (BM8), MHCII (M5/114.15.2), iNOS (CXNFT), CD64 (X54-5/7.1), CD86 (GL1), CD206 (C068C2), IL-4Rα (I015F8), IL-10 (JES5-16E3), and Arg-1 (A1exF5).
For staining of primary SVF cells, cells were passaged and stained using the same staining protocol. The following antibody clones were used for analysis: PDGFRα (APA5), PDGFRβ (APB5), Podoplanin (8.1.1), CD26 (H194-112), and CD90.2/Thy1.2 (53-2.1).
Spheroid Embedding, Sectioning, and Immunofluorescence
Spheroids were stained using previously published methods [53, 54]. Tissues were carefully transferred to microcentrifuge tubes using wide bore pipet tips. Spheroids were rinsed in PBS and fixed in 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin overnight at 4 °C. They were then rinsed in PBS and incubated in 30% sucrose overnight at 4 °C. They were subsequently incubated 2–4 h in 1:1 mixture of 30% sucrose-PBS and OCT, transferred to a mold with OCT, and stored at − 80 °C before cryosectioning. For immunofluorescence, slides were incubated in PBS to remove OCT and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X 100 in PBS for 10 min. Sections (15 µm) were then rinsed with PBS and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS with 10% normal goat serum (NGS) for 1 h at room temperature in humid chambers. Sections were incubated with primary antibody diluted in 1% BSA in PBS overnight in humid chambers at 4 °C. After rinsing with PBS, sections were incubated with secondary antibody diluted in 1% BSA in PBS for 2 h in humid chambers. Then, after additional PBS rinses, sections were incubated with phalloidin (ThermoFisher) for 1 h. Coverslips were mounted onto slides using NucBlue mounting media (ThermoFisher) and allowed to cure overnight before imaging on a fluorescence microscope (Leica DMi8). Antibodies and stains used for immunofluorescence studies include iNOS (Abcam), CD206 (Abcam), collagen IV (Abcam), MMP 9 (Abcam), F4/80 (Invitrogen) and phalloidin (ThermoFisher).
For whole mount staining, spheroids were transferred to PBS after fixation. They were blocked and permeabilized in buffer containing 1% BSA, 1% DMSO, 1% Triton-X 100, and 1% NGS for 1 h at room temperature on an orbital shaker. After blocking, they were incubated with primary antibodies for 72 h at 4 °C. After primary antibody incubation, spheroids were rinsed 5 times, then incubated with secondary antibodies (1:200), Hoechst (2 μM), and phalloidin (Thermofisher) for 24 h at 4 °C. After secondary incubation, spheroids were rinsed 5 times and imaged. Fiji was used to for image analysis.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Spheroids were fixed using methods previously published [55]. Briefly, spheroids were carefully transferred from culture plates into a microcentrifuge tube using a wide bore pipet. Spheroids were washed in 1x PBS and then fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde, 4% paraformaldehyde, and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.3) for 1 h at 4 °C followed by incubation in 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. After fixation, spheroids were washed 3x in PBS then dehydrated in a series of 10 min incubations of 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, and 2x 100% ethanol at room temperature. The spheroids were then further dehydrated in 50% ethanol:hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) and 100% HMDS, and air dried overnight. They were mounted on carbon backed aluminum stubs, sputter coated with gold for 45 seconds (Cressington), and imaged using a Quanta 250 Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy at 5 kV.
Primary Macrophage Isolation and Culture
Bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) were cultured using previously published methods [56, 57]. Briefly, macrophages were isolated from the femurs of Nu/Nu mice as we have shown that macrophages from Nu/Nu and Balb/C mice exhibit similar secretion profiles and effects on tumor cell invasion and migration [6]. Femurs were crushed using a mortar and pestle, and the cell suspension was passed through a 40 µm filter. Red blood cells were lysed with an ACK lysis buffer, and macrophage precursors were plated at densities of 1 × 106 cells/plate in IMDM supplemented with 10% FBS, antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin), and 10 ng/mL macrophage colony stimulating factor (MCSF) on 10 cm low adhesion plates for 7 days for maturation into macrophages. For polarization, media was spiked with LPS and IFN-γ for 24 h (M1 macrophages) or IL-4 for 48 h (M2 macrophages).
Invasion Assay
Conditioned media (CM) collected from spheroid and macrophage co-cultures was used as chemoattractants in a transwell migration assay (Corning reduced growth factor Matrigel invasion chamber, 8 µm pore size). Spheroids were irradiated to 20 Gy and then co-cultured with 2:1 M2:M1 macrophages. Supernatant was collected after 24 h of co-culture. 100,000 4T1 cells were seeded into the upper chambers and incubated with CM for 24 h. Cells that invaded through Matrigel inserts or migrated through uncoated inserts were stained with NucBlue mounting media and nuclei were counted. Invasion was calculated by dividing invasion counts by migration counts.
Spheroid 4T1 Migration Assay
24 h after irradiation of spheroids, 100 GFP-labeled 4T1 cells were plated per spheroid. Infiltration was monitored via live cell fluorescence and phase contrast imaging every 24 h for a total of 72 h after plating of 4T1 cells. GFP signal was evaluated as a function of radial position via a custom MATLAB (MathWorks) script. Along the radial axis, 1,000 readings of fluorescent intensity were evaluated over every angle of each spheroid. Readings were normalized to the overall length of each radius to generate relative intensity values. For each biological replicate, more than 10 technical replicates were analyzed.
IL-6 and MMP9 Quantification
IL-6 and MMP9 secretion in CM was measured using an ELISA assay (R&D systems) per manufacturer instructions.
Statistical Analysis
To determine statistical significance, differences in radiation dose on flow cytometry data and cytokine concentration were analyzed using two-tailed unpaired t-tests. One-Way ANOVA was evaluated when comparing co-culture conditions for GFP intensity, IL-6 secretion, MMP9 secretion, and 4T1 invasiveness. All statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad Prism 9.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Laura L. Bronsart for providing the GFP- and luciferase-labeled 4T1 cells, Dr. Michael Freeman for irradiator use, Dr. Austin Kirschner for the Cerrobend jig, and Dr. Craig L. Duvall for IVIS use. We also thank the Vanderbilt Cell Imaging Shared Resource (CISR) core for SEM imaging and the Translational Pathology Shared Resource (TPSR) for IF sample preparation. Schematics were created with BioRender.com. This research was financially supported by NIH grants #R00CA201304, F31CA254311 (B.C. Hacker), S10RR026373 (CISR), and P30CA068485 (TPSR) as well as the Breast Cancer Alliance Young Investigator Grant.
Author Contributions
M.R. and B.C.H. conceived the study, designed experiments, and wrote and revised the manuscript. B.C.H., E.J.L., D.C.H., A.M.Q., S.E.M., R.J.H., and A.J.W. conducted experiments and processed and analyzed the data supervised by M.R.
Data Availability
The data supporting the results of this study are available within the paper and in the supplementary information. The raw data are available for research purposes from the corresponding author upon request.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
B.C.H., E.J.L, D.C.H., A.M.Q., S.E.M., R.J.H., A.J.W., and M.R. declare no competing financial interests.
Ethical Approval
All procedures with animals were conducted in accordance with institutional and National Institutes of Health guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the appropriate institutional committee. No human studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Siegel RL, Millder KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adkins FC, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Lei X, Hernandez-Aya LF, Mittendorf EA, Litton JK, Wagner J, Hunt KK, Woodward WA, Meric-Bernstam F. Triple-negative breast cancer is not a contraindication for breast conservation. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2011;18:3164–3173. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1920-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dragun AE, Pan J, Rai SN, Kruse B, Jain D. Locoregional recurrence in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: preliminary results of a single institution study. Am. J. Clin. Oncol.: Cancer Clin. Trials. 2011;34:231–237. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181dea993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lowery AJ, Kell MR, Glynn RW, Kerin MJ, Sweeney KJ. Locoregional recurrence after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review by receptor phenotype. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012;133:831–841. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1891-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Adra J, Lundstedt D, Killander F, Holmberg E, Haghanegi M, Kjellen E, Karlsson P, Alkner S. Distribution of locoregional breast cancer recurrence in relation to postoperative radiation fields and biological subtypes. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2019;105:285–295. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rafat M, Aguilera TA, Vilalta M, Bronsart LL, Soto LA, von Eyben R, Golla MA, Ahrari Y, Melemenidis S, Afghahi A, Jenkins MJ, Kurian AW, Horst KC, Giaccia AJ, Graves EE. Macrophages promote circulating tumor cell-mediated local recurrence following radiotherapy in immunosuppressed patients. Cancer Res. 2018;78:4241–4252. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sherry AD, von Eyben R, Newman NB, Gutkin P, Mayer I, Horst K, Chakravarthy AB, Rafat M. Systemic inflammation after radiation predicts locoregional recurrence, progression, and mortality in stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2020;108:268–276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Conesa MAVC, Garcia-Martinez E, Billalabeitia EG, Benito AC, Garcia TG, Garcia VV, de la Pena FA. Predictive value of peripheral blood lymphocyte count in breast cancer patients treated with primary chemotherapy. The Breast. 2012;21:468–474. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kuo P, Bratman SV, Shultz DB, von Eyben R, Chan C, Wang Z, Say C, Gupta A, Loo BW, Jr, Giaccia AJ, Koong AC, Diehn M, Le QT. Galectin-1 mediates radiation-related lymphopenia and attenuates NSCLC radiation response. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014;20:5558–5569. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Afghahi A, Purington N, Han SS, Desai M, Pierson E, Mathur MB, Seto T, Thompson CA, Rigdon J, Telli ML, Badve SS, Curtis CN, West RB, Horst K, Gomez SL, Ford JM, Sledge GW, Kurian AW. Higher absolute lymphocyte counts predict lower mortality from early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;24:2851–2858. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Barcellos-Hoff MH, Ravani SA. Irradiated mammary gland stroma promotes the expression of tumorigenic potential by unirradiated epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2000;60:1254–1260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zheng Z, Jia S, Shao C, Shi Y. Irradiation induces cancer lung metastasis through activation of the cGAS-STING-CCL5 pathway in mesenchymal stromal cells. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:326. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2546-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ahn GO, Brown JM. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 Is required for tumor vasculogenesis but not for angiogenesis: role of bone marrow-derived myelomonocytic cells. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.11.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hacker BC, Rafat M. Organoids as complex in vitro models for studying radiation-induced cell recruitment. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 2020;13:341–357. doi: 10.1007/s12195-020-00625-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bagley JA, Reumann D, Bian S, Lévi-Strauss J, Knoblich JA. Fused cerebral organoids model interactions between brain regions. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:743–751. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hacker BC, Gomez JD, Silvera Batista CA, Rafat M. Growth and characterization of irradiated organoids from mammary glands. J Vis Exp. 2019;147:e59293. doi: 10.3791/59293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang F, Weaver VM, Petersen OW, Larabell CA, Dedhar S, Briand P, Lupu R, Bissell MJ. Reciprocal interactions between β1-integrin and epidermal growth factor receptor in three-dimensional basement membrane breast cultures: a different perspective in epithelial biology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1998;95:14821–14826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kennedy WR, Thomas MA, Stanley JA, Luo J, Ochoa LL, Clifton KK, Cyr AE, Margenthaler JA, DeWees TA, Price A, Kashani R, Green O, Zoberi I. Single-institution phase 1/2 prospective clinical trial of single-fraction, high-gradient adjuvant partial-breast irradiation for hormone sensitive stage 0-I breast cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2020;107:344–352. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vilalta M, Rafat M, Giaccia AJ, Graves EE. Recruitment of circulating breast cancer cells is stimulated by radiotherapy. Cell Rep. 2014;8:402–409. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ma RY, Zhang H, Li XF, Zhang CB, Selli C, Tagliavini G, Lam AD, Prost S, Sims AH, Hu HY, Ying T, Wang Z, Ye Z, Pollard JW, Qian BZ. Monocyte-derived macrophages promote breast cancer bone metastasis outgrowth. J. Exp. Med. 2020;217:e20191820. doi: 10.1084/jem.20191820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sommerfeld SD, Cherry C, Schab RM, Chung L, Jr. Maestas RD, Laffont P, Stein JE, Tam A, Ganguly S, Housseau F, Taube JM, Pardoll DM, Cahan P, Elisseeff JH. Interleukin-36 gamma-producing macrophages drive IL-17 mediated fibrosis. Sci. Immunol. 2019;4:1–13. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aax4783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yurdagul A, Subramanian M, Wang X, Crown SB, Ilkayeva OR, Darville L, Kolluru GK, Rymond CC, Gerlach BD, Zheng Z, Kuriakose G, Kevil CG, Koomen JM, Cleveland JL, Muoio DM, Tabas I. Macrophage metabolism of apoptotic cell-derived arginine promotes continual efferocytosis and resolution of injury. Cell Metab. 2020;31:518–533. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stovgaard ES, Nielsen D, Hogdall E, Balslev E. Triple negative breast cancer–prognostic role of immune-related factors: a systematic review. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:74–82. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1400180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shabo I, Stål O, Olsson H, Doré S, Svanvik J. Breast cancer expression of CD163, a macrophage scavenger receptor, is related to early distant recurrence and reduced patient survival. Int. J. Cancer. 2008;123:780–786. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Balermpas P, Rödel F, Liberz R, Oppermann J, Wagenblast J, Ghanaati S, Harter PN, Mittelbronn M, Weiss C, Rödel C, Fokas E. Head and neck cancer relapse after chemoradiotherapy correlates with CD163+ macrophages in primary tumour and CD11b+ myeloid cells in recurrences. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;111:1509–1518. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Noman AS, Uddin M, Chowdhury AA, Nayeem MJ, Raihan Z, Rashid MI. Serum sonic hedgehog and interleukin-6 as dual prognostic biomarkers in progressive metastatic breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01268-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kaur S, Bansal Y, Kumar R, Bansal G. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry A panoramic review of IL-6: Structure, pathophysiological roles and inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020;28:115327. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weng Y-S, Tseng H-Y, Chen Y-A, Shen P-C, Tanzih A, Haq A, Chen L-M, Tung Y-C, Hsu H-L. MCT-1/miR-34a/IL-6/IL-6R signaling axis promotes EMT progression, cancer stemness and M2 macrophage polarization in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol. Cancer. 2019;18:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-0988-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Casella G, Garzetti L, Gatta AT, Finardi A, Maiorino C, Ruffini F, Martino G, Muzio L, Furlan R. IL4 induces IL6-producing M2 macrophages associated to inhibition of neuroinflammation in vitro and in vivo. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016;13:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0596-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Moran MS. Radiation therapy in the locoregional treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e113–122. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71104-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Däster S, Amatruda N, Calabrese D, Ivanek R, Droeser RA, Zajac P, Fimognari C, Spagnoli GC, Iezzi G, Mele V, Muraro MG. Induction of hypoxia and necrosis in multicellular tumor spheroids is associated with resistance to chemotherapy treatment. Oncotarget. 2017;8:1725–1736. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sebastian A, Hum NR, Martin KA, Gilmore SF, Peran I, Byers SW, Wheeler EK, Coleman MA, Loots GG. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of heterogeneity in breast cancer. Cancers. 2020;12:1–22. doi: 10.3390/cancers12051307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Venning FA, Zornhagen KW, Wullkopf L, Sjölund J, Rodriguez-Cupello C, Kjellman P, Morsing M, Hajkarim MC, Won KJ, Erler JT, Madsen CD. Deciphering the temporal heterogeneity of cancer-associated fibroblast subpopulations in breast cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021;40:1–21. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-01944-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Deleon-Pennell KY, Barker TH, Lindsey ML. Fibroblasts: the arbiters of extracellular matrix remodeling. Matrix Biol. 2020;91–92:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2020.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Macarak EJ, Rosenbloom J. Therapeutic approaches to radiation-induced fibrosis. J Cancer Treat. Diagn. 2018;2:7–9. doi: 10.29245/2578-2967/2018/4.1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Taylor J, Sellin J, Kuerschner L, Krahl L, Majlesain Y, Forster I, Thiele C, Weighardt H, Weber E. Generation of immune cell containing adipose organoids for in vitro analysis of immune metabolism. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:21104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78015-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chen Y, Song Y, Du W, Gong L, Chang H, Zou Z. Tumor-associated macrophages: an accomplice in solid tumor progression. J. Biomed. Sci. 2019;26:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12929-019-0568-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kuen J, Darowski D, Kluge T, Majety M. Pancreatic cancer cell/fibroblast co-culture induces M2 like macrophages that influence therapeutic response in a 3D model. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0182039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li G, Jin F, Du J, He Q, Yang B, Luo P. Macrophage-secreted TSLP and MMP9 promote bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2019;366:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Iyer RP, Jung M, Lindsey ML. MMP-9 signaling in the left ventricle following myocardial infarction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016;311:H190–H198. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00243.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Qiao G, Ji W, Sun Z, Wang X, Li P, Jia H, Duan L, Qi F. Isosteviol reduces the acute inflammatory response after burns by upregulating MMP9 in macrophages leading to M2 polarization. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2022;106:108609. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gautam J, Banskota S, Lee H, Lee Y-J, Jeon YH, Kim J-A, Jeong B-S. Down-regulation of cathepsin S and matrix metalloproteinase-9 via Src, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase, suppresses triple-negative breast cancer growth and metastasis. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018;50:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0135-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bouaouiche S, Ghione S, Sghaier R, Burgy O, Racoeur C, Derang V, Bettaieb A. Nitric oxide-releasing drug glyceryl trinitrate targets JAK2/STAT3 signaling, migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:8449. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Radharani NN, Yadav AS, Nimma R, Kumar TVS, Bulbule A. Tumor-associated macrophage derived IL-6 enriches cancer stem cell population and promotes breast tumor progression via Stat-3 pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2022;22:1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12935-022-02527-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hartman ZC, Poage GM, den Hollander P, Tsimelzon A, Hill J, Panupinthu N, Zhang Y, Mazumdar A, Hilsenbeck SG, Mills GB, Brown PH. Growth of triple-negative breast cancer cells relies upon coordinate autocrine expression of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8. Cancer Res. 2013;73:3470–3480. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4524-T. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Vasiyani H, Mane M, Rana K, Shinde A, Roy M, Singh J, Gohel D, Currim F, Srivastava R, Singh R. DNA damage induces STING mediated IL-6-STAT3 survival pathway in triple-negative breast cancer cells and decreased survival of breast cancer patients. Apoptosis. 2022;27:961–978. doi: 10.1007/s10495-022-01763-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rossi JF, Lu ZY, Jourdan M, Klein B. Interleukin-6 as a therapeutic target. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015;21:1248–1257. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Oh K, Lee O-Y, Shon SY, Nam O, Ryu PM, Seo MW. A mutual activation loop between breast cancer cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells facilitates spontaneous metastasis through IL-6 trans-signaling in a murine model. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:1–16. doi: 10.1186/bcr3473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wakabayashi H, Hamaguchi T, Nagao N, Kato S, Iino T, Nakamura T. Interleukin—6 receptor inhibitor suppresses bone metastases in a breast cancer cell line. Breast cancer. 2018;25:566–574. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-0853-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Heo T-H, Wahler J, Suh N. Potential therapeutic implications targeting agents in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:15460–15473. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Choy EH, De Benedetti F, Takeuchi T, Hashizume M, John MR, Kishimoto T. Translating IL-6 biology into effective treatments. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2020;16:335–345. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0419-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Benesch MG, Tang X, Dong W, Mackey J, Hemmings D, McMullen T, Brindley D. Tumor-induced inflammation in mammary adipose tissue stimulates a vicious cycle of autotaxin expression and breast cancer progression. FASEB J. 2015;29:3990–4000. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-274480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Alessandri K, Ranjan B, Valérïévitch V, Sinha B. Cellular capsules as a tool for multicellular spheroid production and for investigating the mechanics of tumor progression in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013;110:14843–14848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309482110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Horder H, Lasheras MG, Grummel N, Nadernezhad A, Herbig J, Ergün S, Teßmar J, Groll J, Fabry B, Bauer-kreisel P, Blunk T. Bioprinting and differentiation of adipose-derived stromal cell spheroids for a 3D breast cancer-adipose tissue model. Cells. 2021;10:1–17. doi: 10.3390/cells10040803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sachs N, Papaspyropoulos A, Zomer-van Ommen DD, Heo I, Böttinger L, Klay D, Weeber F, Huelsz-Prince G, Iakobachvili N, Amatngalim GD, Ligt J, Hoeck A, Proost N, Viveen MC, Lyubimova A, Teeven L, Derakhshan S, Korving J, Begthel H, Dekkers JF, Kumawat K, Ramos E, Oosterhout MF, Offerhaus GJ, Wiener DJ, Olimpio EP, Dijkstra KK, Smit EF, Linden M, Jaksani S, Ven M, Jonkers J, Rios AC, Voest EE, Moorsel CH, Ent CK, Cuppen E, Oudenaarden A, Coenjaerts FE, Meyaard L, Bont LJ, Peters PJ, Tans SJ, Zon JS, Boj SF, Vries RG, Beekman JM, Clevers H. Long-term expanding human airway organoids for disease modeling. EMBO J. 2019;38:1–20. doi: 10.15252/embj.2018100300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hildreth AD, Riggan L, Timothy E, Sullivan O, Hildreth AD, Riggan L, Sullivan TEO. Protocol CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein-mediated genomic editing in primary innate immune cells CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein-mediated genomic editing in primary innate immune cells. STAR Protocols. 2020;1:100113. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Trouplin V, Boucherit N, Gorvel L, Conti F, Mottola G, Ghigo E. Bone marrow-derived macrophage production. J. Vis. Exp. 2013;81:e5096. doi: 10.3791/50966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the results of this study are available within the paper and in the supplementary information. The raw data are available for research purposes from the corresponding author upon request.




