Skip to main content
Health Science Reports logoLink to Health Science Reports
. 2023 Oct 4;6(10):e1592. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1592

The prevalence and risk factors of irritable bowel syndrome (PRIBS study) among adults in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A multicenter cross‐sectional study

Ahmad Y Arnaout 1, Yaman Nerabani 1,, Zain Douba 2, Luma H Kassem 1, Khaled Arnaout 1, Muhammad B Shabouk 1, Hussein Zayat 1, Wafik Mayo 1, Yamen Bezo 1, Ibrahim Arnaout 1, Ahmad Yousef 1, Mohamed B Zeina 3, Ziad Aljarad 4; PRIBS Study Team
PMCID: PMC10551279  PMID: 37808932

Abstract

Background and Aims

Because of the plenty and abundance of risk factors and the expected increase in the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in the world in general and in low‐ and middle‐income countries in particular, this international cross‐sectional study was conducted in 15 low‐ and middle‐income countries according to our previous protocol, NCT05340400.

Methods

Participants were recruited in the period from April 22, 2022 to June 14, 2022. The diagnosis of IBS was according to ROME IV. We determined the physical activity, daily stress, and fatigue of the participants. A large number of collaborators were chosen from different regions and institutions within each country to achieve diversity within the sample and reduce the probability of bias.

Results

The prevalence of IBS appears to be higher in low‐ and middle‐income countries (mean = 25.2%, range [6.2%–44.2%]) than in high‐income countries, with a higher prevalence among Africans than Caucasians and Asians. The prevalence of IBS increased in the fourth decade by 32.1% and in the fifth decade by 31.1% (p‐value < 0.001). In addition to the previously known risk factors for IBS such as female sex, smoking, psychological stress, and chronic fatigue, other risk factors were discovered such as chronic diseases, including high blood pressure and diabetes, allergies to some substances, previous infection with COVID‐19, and the participant having a first‐degree relative with a patient. There are also some other modifiable risk factors, such as an abnormal body mass index (whether high or low), smoking, a protein‐ or fat‐rich diet, drinking caffeine‐containing beverages, and poor physical activity.

Conclusions

Highlighting the prevalence and increasing risk factors of IBS in developing countries should draw the attention of those responsible for health care in these countries and reduce the risk factors.

Keywords: international cross‐sectional study, irritable bowel syndrome, prevalence, risk factors

Key points

What is already known on this topic

The criteria for diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have evolved over time, and the disease, when diagnosed based on previous criteria such as ROME II and ROME III, has been associated with many risk factors, such as female gender, psychological distress, and chronic fatigue. The prevalence in many countries was calculated in previous studies. But so far, no study has reported the prevalence and risk factors for IBS in middle‐ and low‐income countries, according to ROME IV.

What this study adds

The prevalence of IBS was greater in middle‐ and low‐income countries than in high‐income countries, with a higher prevalence in African ethnicity compared to Caucasian and Asian countries. In addition to the well‐known risk factors that were also confirmed by our study, which are psychological distress, chronic fatigue, female sex, and a protein‐ or fat‐rich diet, we found many other risk factors, which are not doing enough physical activity, smoking, chronic diseases, especially hypertension and diabetes, allergy to some substances, previous infection with COVID 19 within 12 months, abnormal weight (either high or low), and sleep less than 6 h.

How this study might affect research, practice, or policy

The lack of attention paid to chronic digestive diseases in developing countries has led to their spread and poor quality of life. Therefore, highlighting their prevalence and increasing risk factors, more attention must be drawn to those responsible for health care in these countries, and the modifiable risk factors must be reduced.

1. INTRODUCTION

The spread of chronic digestive diseases in the world has led to a poor quality of life, especially in low and middle‐income countries. In those countries, many suffer from chronic digestive diseases, in particular irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). IBS is a chronic functional disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that is widespread and common all over the world. 1

In general, patients present to clinicians with different symptoms, but there are four that dominate overall: abdominal discomfort, pain, diarrhea, constipation, and bloating. However, patients may present with other symptoms such as postprandial upper abdominal discomfort, fullness, nausea, heartburn, and, less commonly, vomiting. Based on the idea of symptom diversity, IBS was classified into several subtypes according to the predominant stool pattern. 1

IBS prevalence ranges between 9% and 23% of the population across the world. 2 Since the 1980s, methods for diagnosing IBS have varied; since 2016, ROME IV criteria have been shown to be the standard methods for diagnosing IBS, in addition to excluding other digestive disorders. 3

Because of the plenty and abundance of risk factors and the expected increase in the prevalence of IBS in the world in general and in low and middle‐income countries in particular, our study was established with the aim of assessing and detecting latent potential and apparent risk factors, especially since risk factors and diagnostic criteria are constantly changing and evolving, in addition to updating the prevalence data in different societies and determining whether race has an effect.

2. METHODS

2.1. Study design

The international cross‐sectional study was conducted in 15 low‐ and middle‐income countries according to our previously published protocol NCT05340400 and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines for cross‐sectional studies. 4 Participants were recruited in the period from April 22, 2022 to June 14, 2022.

2.2. Patient and public involvement

The inclusion criteria were adults willing to participate in this survey who were 18 years of age or older. Exclusion criteria were: any participant who was diagnosed with poorly controlled hyperthyroidism, poorly controlled hypothyroidism, poorly controlled hyperparathyroidism, paralysis, or parasitic diseases. Moreover, any presence (or suspicion) of liver disease, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease or Ulcerative colitis), lactose intolerance, or cancer or tumor in the digestive tract in their clinical history. No formal sample size was calculated for this study.

The total number of participants in the study was 5506, from 15 low‐ and middle‐income countries. The number of participants from Syria was 2909, followed by Egypt (536), Sudan (536), Pakistan (380), Libya (222), Algeria (222), Jordan (176), Iraq (125), India (102), Yemen (72), Palestine (69), and the rest from Morocco, Serbia, Bangladesh, and Saudi Arabia. With the participation of 148 data collectors from different cities and institutions in the participating countries. The participants volunteered to participate by agreeing to the investigation and filling out their data.

2.3. Variables and measurement

The data were collected using a validated, structured questionnaire. The first part collected sociodemographic characteristics such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), educational level, work, and marital state. Participants were also categorized into five grades based on their health status using the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) classification. 5 Participants were also asked about their comorbidities.

The diagnosis of IBS was made by identifying the presence of abdominal pain at least once a week in the last 3 months, in addition to at least two of the following: abdominal pain related to defecation, change in stool frequency, or shape. In addition to classifying patients according to their symptoms into IBS with constipation (IBS‐C), IBS with diarrhea (IBS‐D), or IBS with both (IBS‐M). 3

We determined the physical activity of the participants according to the Global Physical Activity Score of the World Health Organization (WHO). This score consists of three parts: the amount of effort spent at work (vigorous or moderate‐intensity activity), traveling from one place to another, and sports intensity (vigorous or moderate‐intensity activity) on a typical day. And then classified the participants according to whether physical activity is required or not. 6

Daily stress was evaluated with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the most widely used measure of global perceived stress and a robust predictor of health and disease. The total score is calculated on the basis of the answers to a series of questions based on monthly stress and the participant's health status. PSS is a summary measure of 10 items (range 0–4 points for every item). It is classified into low (PSS 0–13), moderate (PSS 14–26), and high perceived stress (PSS 27–40). 7

Fatigue was measured using the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ), a questionnaire for measuring the extent and severity of fatigue within both clinical and nonclinical epidemiological studies. 8

Diet and daily habits, including smoking and alcohol consumption, were evaluated. Participants were classified into four sections according to WHO's Smoking and Tobacco Use Policy. A daytime smoker is someone who smokes any tobacco product at least once a day, and an occasional smoker is someone who smokes but not every day. 9 Each question was explained to the participant separately by the collaborator.

2.4. Bias

A large number of collaborators were chosen from different regions and institutions within each country to achieve diversity within the sample and reduce the probability of bias. We trained the collaborators with a course explaining each section of the questionnaire and how to present it to the participants. The tutorial videos were uploaded in Arabic and English on YouTube. We also translated the questionnaire into Arabic by two Arab doctors separately and simultaneously, and the translation underwent a peer‐review process.

2.5. Statistical methods

Data were analyzed using SPSS PC version 24.0 statistical software. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequencies, and percentages) were used to describe the quantitative and categorical variables. Moreover, the Chi‐square test was used for each variable only if the sample number exceeded 100 to observe the association between the categorical study and outcome variables. The quantitative variables such as age, body mass index, and drinking water in litters were divided into categories, and then we equated the chi‐square. We calculated the prevalence for each country if the country's participants exceeded 200. All the results of the statistical inference tests were interpreted to a 95% confidence level, that is, the significance level of 0.05 was used with two‐tailed hypothesis. The normal distribution suitability of the numerical variables was tested with the Shapiro–Wilk test.

2.6. Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments, and under ethical approval from the ethics committee at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo, Syria. Moreover, Ethical approval was obtained in each country independently by the national lead, and participants' information was kept anonymous and confidential. Informed consent was obtained from all patients before participating, and all forms were filled out after a personal interview with the participant to explain all the questions.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Participants and descriptive data

Most of the participants were of Caucasian ethnicity (85.3%), and the others were Asian (9.1%), Afro‐Caribbean (4.8%), and other ethnicities (0.8%). The mean age of the participants was 32.7, with a standard deviation of 14.5. 2% of participants were female (41.8% male). No missing data was found.

3.2. Prevalence of IBS

The average prevalence of IBS was 25.2% (6.2%–44.2%), with a higher rate among the Afro‐Caribbean race at 31.5%. Most of the participants were of IBS‐M type (40.5%) and IBS‐C type (36.1%). The highest prevalence of IBS was in Sudan (29.2%) and Egypt (28.9%), and the lowest prevalence was in Algeria (18.5%). The prevalence of IBS and its sub‐types for each country and ethnicity are found in Table 1.

Table 1.

Prevalence of IBS according to the population based of the participants.

Category Subcategory Participants without IBS Participants with IBS Total
IBS‐C IBS‐D IBS‐M IBS‐other
Ethnicity
Caucasian (n, %) 3487 (74.3%) 432 (9.2%) 216 (4.6%) 485 (10.3%) 75 (1.6%) 4695
Afro‐Caribbean (n, %) 183 (68.5%) 33 (12.4%) 10 (3.7%) 38 (14.2%) 3 (1.1%) 267
Asian (n, %) 411 (82.5%) 32 (6.4%) 16 (3.2%) 37 (7.4%) 2 (0.4%) 498
Hispanic (n, %) Not counted Not counted Not counted Not counted Not counted 2
Other (n, %) Not counted Not counted Not counted Not counted Not counted 43
Total 4118 (74.8%) 500 (9.1%) 244 (4.4%) 563 (10.2%) 80 (1.5%) 5506
Country
Syria (n, %) 2235 (76.8%) 290 (10.0%) 135 (4.6%) 209 (7.2%) 40 (1.4%) 2909
Egypt (n, %) 381 (71.1%) 36 (6.7%) 23 (4.3%) 93 (17.4%) 3 (0.6%) 536
Pakistan (n, %) 298 (78.4%) 31 (8.2%) 15 (3.9%) 34 (8.9%) 2 (0.5%) 380
Sudan (n, %) 377 (70.2%) 44 (8.2%) 29 (5.4%) 76 (14.2%) 11 (2.0%) 537
Algeria (n, %) 181 (81.5%) 9 (4.1%) 3 (1.4%) 23 (10.4%) 6 (2.7%) 222
Total* 4118 (74.8%) 500 (9.1%)/CI: 3.9%–5.0% 244 (4.4%)/CI: 9.5%–11.0% 563 (10.2%)/CI: 1.2%–1.9% 80 (1.5%) 5506

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS‐C, irritable bowel syndrome‐constipation Type; IBS‐D, irritable bowel syndrome‐diarrhea type; IBS‐M, irritable bowel syndrome‐mixed type.

*

For all study participants, even from countries with less than 200 participants.

3.3. Risk factors of IBS

3.3.1. Sociodemographic risk factors

The prevalence of the IBS increased with age, especially the peak prevalence between 31 and 50 years (fourth decade 32.1% and fifth decade 31.1% p‐value < 0.001). There was a tendency for the disease to be statistically greater among females than males (28.0% vs. 22.1%, p‐value < 0.001). The prevalence of the disease was statistically lower in those with a body mass index within normal and increased if they were underweight, overweight, or obese (22.9 vs. 25.2%, 27.1%, and 33.8% consecutively, p‐value < 0.001). IBS among healthy participants was lower than in participants with mild and severe systemic diseases (23.4% vs. 31.4% and 26.7% consecutively, p‐value < 0.001). Rural participants were more likely to be patients than urban participants (29.6% vs. 24.8%, p‐value < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Correlation of IBS according to the sociodemographic of the participants.

Category Subcategory Participants without IBS Participants with IBS Total Pearson chi‐square p‐Value
Age 43.965 <0.001
18–30 (n, %) 2625 (77.4%) 767 (22.6%) 3392
31–40 (n, %) 476 (67.9%) 225 (32.1%) 701
41–50 (n, %) 415 (68.9%) 187 (31.1%) 602
51–60 (n, %) 341 (71.0%) 139 (29.0%) 480
More than 60 (n, %) 242 (73.3%) 88 (26.7%) 330
Gender 5530.936 <0.001
Male (n, %) 1793 (77.9%) 508 (22.1%)/CI: 20.4%–23.9% 2301
Female (n, %) 2306 (72.0%) 898 (28.0%)/CI: 26.6%–29.5% 3204
BMI according WHO Classification 33.447 <0.001
Underweight < 18.5 (n, %) 279 (74.8%) 94 (25.2%) 373
Normal range [18.5–24.9] (n, %) 2142 (77.1%) 638 (22.9%) 2780
Overweight [25.0–29.9] (n, %) 1122 (72.9%) 418 (27.1%) 1540
Obese Class I [30–34.9] (n, %) 394 (66.2%) 201 (33.8%) 595
Obese Class II [35–39.9] (n, %) 124 (73.8%) 44 (26.2%) 168
Obese Class III > 40 (n, %) Not Counted Not Counted 49
ASA grade 5544.174 <0.001
ASA I (n, %) 2928 (76.6%) 896 (23.4%) 3824
ASA II (n, %) 961 (68.6%) 440 (31.4%) 1401
ASA III (n, %) 181 (73.3%) 66 (26.7%) 247
ASA IV (n, %) Not counted Not counted 27
ASA V (n, %) Not counted Not counted 6
Geographic 5517.374 <0.001
Urban life (n, %) 3339 (75.2%) 1100 (24.8%) 4439
Rural life (n, %) 683 (70.4%) 287 (29.6%) 970
Nomad life (n, %) Not counted Not counted 96

Note: ASA I, healthy person; ASA II, mild systemic disease; ASA III, severe systemic disease; ASA IV, severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life; ASA IV, a moribund person who is not expected to survive without the operation; ASA V, a declared brain‐dead person whose organs are being removed for donor purposes.

Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome.

3.3.2. Comorbidities risk factors

65.5% of the participants with IBS have reported that one of their first‐degree relatives has been diagnosed with IBS. The prevalence of IBS among patients with hypertension, diabetes, anemia, and allergies to certain substances is significantly higher (33.4%, 33.9%, 31.5%, and 28.8%, p‐values < 0.05) than among non‐patients. There is an association between IBS and some other chronic digestive diseases such as EPS, PPDS, GERD, and functional dyspepsia (p‐value < 0.05).

The prevalence of IBS among patients infected with COVID‐19 within a year is more significant than among others (27.4% vs. 24.1%, p‐value < 0.001). There is a significant increase in prevalence in participants with severe fatigue (39.7%) compared with moderate (27.3%) and low (16.3%) fatigue (p‐value < 0.001). Also, there is a significant increase in prevalence in the participants with high stress (31.8%) compared with moderate (26.0%) and low (10.0%) fatigue (p‐value < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Correlation of IBS according to comorbidities.

Category Subcategory Participants without IBS Participants with IBS Total Pearson chi‐square p‐Value
Family history (first‐degree relatives diagnosed with IBS (n, %)) Yes 1512 (64.9%) 818 (35.1%) 2330 5700.464 <0.001
No 2587 (81.5%) 588 (18.5%) 3175
EPS (n, %) Yes 1002 (55.4%) 806 (44.6%) 1808 6019.257 <0.001
No 3097 (83.8%) 600 (16.2%) 3697
PPDS (n, %) Yes 876 (54.9%) 721 (45.1%) 1597 5960.829 <0.001
No 3223 (82.5%) 685 (17.5%) 3908
GERD (n, %) Yes 905 (62.4%) 546 (37.6%) 1451 5657.439 <0.001
No 3194 (78.8%) 860 (21.2%) 4054
Hypertension requiring medication (n, %) Yes 404 (66.6%) 203 (33.4%) 607 22.404 <0.001
No 3695 (75.4%) 1203 (24.6%) 4898
Diabetes mellitus (n, %) Yes 265(66.1%) 136(33.9%) 401 15.951 <0.001
No 3834 (75.1%) 1270 (24.9%) 5104
Autoimmune diseases (n, %) Yes 111 (77.6%) 32(22.4%) 143 .772 0.380
No 3988 (74.4%) 1374 (25.6%) 5362
Headache or migraine (n, %) Yes 406 (72.1%) 157 (27.9%) 563 1.815 0.178
No 3693 (74.7%) 1249 (25.3%) 4942
Chronic immunosuppression (n, %) Yes Not calculated Not calculated 23 Not calculated
No 5482
Anemia (n, %) Yes 491 (68.5%) 226 (31.5%) 717 15.501 <0.001
No 3608 (75.4%) 1180 (24.6%) 4788
Allergic to certain substances (n, %) Yes 432 (71.2%) 175 (28.8%) 607 3.883 0.049
No 3667 (74.9%) 1231 (25.1%) 4898
COPD (n, %) Yes Not calculated Not calculated 50 Not calculated
No 5455
Asthma (n, %) Yes 199 (74.8%) 67 (25.2%) 266 0.018 0.893
No 3900 (74.4%) 1339 (25.6%) 5239
Ischemic heart disease (n, %) Yes 80 (74.1%) 28 (25.9%) 108 0.009 0.926
No 4019 (74.5%) 1378 (25.5%) 5397
Urinary problems (n, %) Yes 161 (71.2%) 65 (28.8%) 226 1.285 0.257
No 3938 (74.6%) 1341 (25.4%) 5279
Functional dyspepsia (n, %) Yes 123 (51.9%) 114 (48.1%) 237 66.286 <0.001
No 3976 (75.5%) 1292 (24.5%) 5268
Endometriosis (n, %) Yes Not calculated Not calculated 31 Not calculated
No 5474
Past history of COVID‐19 infection (within the last 12 months) (n, %) Yes 1768 (72.6%) 667 (27.4%) 2435 5513.875 <0.001
No 2331 (75.9%) 739 (24.1%) 3070
Abdominal surgery/laparotomy (n, %) Yes 768 (68.4%) 355 (31.6%) 1123 5533.350 <0.001
No 3331 (76.0%) 1051 (24.0%) 4382
The Chalder Fatigue Scale
Low fatigue (n, %) 1246 (83.7%) 24 (16.3%) 1488 5635.541 <0.001
Moderate fatigue (n, %) 2529 (72.7%) 951 (27.3%) 3480
Severe fatigue (n, %) 324 (60.3%) 213 (39.7%) 537
Perceived Stress Scale
Low stress (n, %) 422 (90.0%) 47 (10.0%) 469 5583.025 <0.001
Moderate stress (n, %) 3118 (74.0%) 1098 (26.0%) 4216
High stress (n, %) 559 (68.2%) 261 (31.8%) 820

Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EPS, epigastric pain syndrome; GERD, gastro‐esophagus retardation disease; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; PPDS, postprandial distress syndrome.

3.3.3. Habits and field of work risk factors

There is a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of IBS in people who work, especially in the fields of agricultural projects and natural resources, civil engineering, informatics, technology or computer engineering, commercial companies and offices, home economics, industry, and teaching (p‐value < 0.05). But the prevalence of IBS among medical workers such as physicians and nurses is statistically less than others (23.6% and 22.7% vs. 25.8% and 25.6%, p‐value < 0.001)  (Table 4).

Table 4.

Correlation of IBS according to the field of work or profession of the participants.

Category Subcategory Participants without IBS Participants with IBS Total Pearson chi‐square p‐Value
Agricultural projects and natural resources (e.g., Farmer) (n, %) Yes 82 (72.6%) 31 (27.4%) 113 5506.217 <0.001
No 4017 (74.5%) 1375 (25.5%) 5392
Civil engineer (n, %) Yes 108 (71.5%) 43 (28.5%) 151 5506.704 <0.001
No 3991 (74.5%) 1363 (25.5%) 5354
Informatics, technology or computer engineer…etc. (n, %) Yes 140 (73.7%) 50 (26.3%) 190 5506.062 <0.001
No 3959 (74.5%) 1356 (25.5%) 5315
Commercial companies and offices (n, %) Yes 141 (72.3%) 54 (27.7%) 195 5506.492 <0.001
No 3958 (74.5%) 1352 (25.5%) 5310
Physicians (n, %) Yes 465 (76.4%) 144 (23.6%) 609 5507.293 <0.001
No 3634 (74.2%) 1262 (25.8%) 4896
Nurses (n, %) Yes 140 (77.3%) 41 (22.7%) 181 5506.821 <0.001
No 3959 (74.4%) 1365 (25.6%) 5324
Home economics (n, %) Yes 168 (71.2%) 68 (28.8%) 236 5507.389 <0.001
No 3931 (74.6%) 1338 (25.4%) 5269
Industry (n, %) Yes 81 (71.1%) 33 (28.9%) 114 5506.711 <0.001
No 4018 (74.5%) 1373 (25.5%) 5391
Teaching (schools, universities) (n, %) Yes 327 (71.9%) 128 (28.1%) 455 5509.445 <0.001
No 3772 (74.7%) 1278 (25.3%) 5050
Not working (n, %) Yes 1738 (75.8%) 555 (24.2%) 2293 5509.691 <0.001
No 2361 (73.5%) 851 (26.5%) 3212

Abbreviation: IBS, irritable bowel syndrome.

Participants who need to do physical activity are statistically more likely to be patients than those whose physical activity is acceptable (25.7% vs. 24.9%, p‐value < 0.001). Also, those whose diet consists mainly of fats and proteins are statistically more likely to be patients than those who depend on high‐fiber foods and a diverse diet (p‐value < 0.001). There is also a statistical prevalence of those who eat intermittent meals between the main meals (p‐value < 0.001).

IBS is statistically more prevalent among smokers than non‐smokers, even if they quit smoking or only smoke on occasion (p‐value < 0.001). There is a statistically lower prevalence of the disease in moderate drinkers, but there is not enough sample size in those heavy drinkers due to the religious nature of the participating countries, so we were unable to know the effect of heavy alcohol drinking on IBS. Participants who sleep 6–8 h were statistically less likely to be patients than those who slept more than 8 h or less than 6 h (24.9% vs. 27.5% and 25.8% consecutively, p‐value < 0.001). The prevalence of the disease among those who drink stimulants like tea or coffee and its derivatives is statistically higher than its prevalence among those who drink other types of stimulants or who do not drink them (p‐value < 0.001). There appears to be an inverse correlation between the prevalence of disease and the amount of water drunk, but it is not statistically significant (Table 5).

Table 5.

Correlation of IBS according to habits.

Category Subcategory Participants without IBS Participants with IBS Total Pearson chi‐square p‐Value
Global physical activity score
Physical activity is not required (score > 600) (n, %) 724 (75.1%) 240 (24.9%) 964 917.160 <0.001
Physical activity is required (score < 600) (n, %) 3371 (74.3%) 1165 (25.7%) 4536
Participant's predominant food pattern
Fatty food (n, %) 387 (70.5%) 162 (29.5%) 549 5519.924 <0.001
Carbohydrates (n, %) 798 (72.4%) 304 (27.6%) 1102
Protein food (n, %) 270 (71.2%) 109 (28.8%) 379
High‐fiber foods (n, %) 248 (76.5%) 76 (23.5%) 324
Other (n, %) 43 (75.4%) 14 (24.6%) 57
Diverse (n, %) 2353 (76.1%) 741 (23.9%) 3094
Eating snacks between the main meals
Yes (n, %) 2574 (73.4%) 931 (26.6%) 3505 5511.296 <0.001
No (n, %) 1525 (76.3%) 475 (23.8%) 2000
Smoking
A daily smoker (n, %) 678 (72.9%) 252 (27.1%) 930 2757.424 <0.001
An occasional smoker (n, %) 454 (72.4%) 173 (27.6%) 627
Ex‐smoker (n, %) 199 (72.4%) 76 (27.6%) 275
Nonsmoker (n, %) 2767 (75.4%) 905 (24.6%) 3672
Drinking alcohol
Not drinking (n, %) 3897 (74.3%) 1348 (25.7%) 5245 2754.990 <0.001
In moderation (n, %) 187 (77.0%) 56 (23.0%) 243
Sleeping hours
Less than 6 (n, %) 781 (74.2%) 271 (25.8%) 1052 2755.635 <0.001
Between 6 and 8 (n, %) 2530 (75.1%) 837 (24.9%) 3367
More than 8 (n, %) 787 (72.5%) 298 (27.5%) 1085
kind of stimulants that participants usually drink?
Tea (n, %) Yes 2038 (72.8%) 761 (27.2%) 2799 66.889 <0.001
No 1995 (76.5%) 613 (23.5%) 2608
Coffee and its derivatives (n, %) Yes 1947 (74.1%) 680 (25.9%) 2627 57.857 <0.001
No 2086 (75.0%) 694 (25.0%) 2780
Mate (drink) (n, %) Yes 399 (77.3%) 117 (22.7%) 516 59.502 <0.001
No 3634 (74.3%) 1257 (25.7%) 4891
Energy drinks (n, %) Yes 217 (79.2%) 57 (20.8%) 274 60.479 <0.001
No 3816 (74.3%) 1317 (25.7%) 5133
Carbonated drinks (n, %) Yes 417 (78.7%) 113 (21.3%) 530 62.426 <0.001
No 3616 (74.1%) 1261 (25.9%) 4877
Amount of water drunk in liters
Less than 1 liter per day (n, %) 285 (72.3%) 109 (27.7%) 394 9.257 0.055
1–2 liter per day (n, %) 1436 (73.8%) 509 (26.2%) 1945
2–3 liter per day (n, %) 1417 (73.8%) 502 (26.2%) 1919
3–4 liter per day (n, %) 623 (75.5%) 202 (24.5%) 825
More than 4 L per day (n, %) 338 (80.1%) 84 (19.9%) 422

Abbreviation: IBS, irritable bowel syndrome.

4. DISCUSSION

4.1. Prevalence of IBS

Our study included 5506 participants from 15 low‐ and middle‐income countries. The mean prevalence of IBS in our sample was 25.2%, with Sudan and Egypt having the highest percentages. The prevalence of IBS was higher among Africans than Caucasians, and it seems that environmental and genetic factors play a role in this, which should be investigated more in other studies.

IBS prevalence in Pakistan was 21.6%, which is considered a dramatic increase from the 13.3% reported in the same country in 2006. 10 Furthermore, Egyptian IBS prevalence was 28.9%; a similar percentage (27.5%) was found by a cross‐sectional study done on Egyptian medical students in the year 2022. 11 Nonetheless, the Pakistani study used Rome II for diagnosis, and the Egyptian study included only 182 participants and used Rome III instead of Rome IV criteria.

The pathophysiology of IBS is functional impairment of the GI tract in the absence of any obvious biological abnormalities. 12 This functional impairment is centered around three main principles: altered GI motility, GI hyperalgesia, and psychopathology. 13 The latter may justify the increased prevalence in stressed individuals, as well as in people who sleep less than 6 h.

4.2. Nonmodifiable risk factors

Several factors are associated with a higher probability of IBS. Some of these factors are non‐modifiable, such as the fourth and fifth decades of age and a positive family history of IBS.

Some studies have found an association between some variations in the sucrase‐isomerase gene and increased risk of IBS, 14 , 15 a finding that might explain the increased prevalence in participants who have a positive family history of IBS in a first‐degree relative.

The female gender was also a risk factor for IBS. This can be justified by the role of estrogen in regulating two of the three main principles of IBS, which are GI motility and visceral pain. 16

Non‐modifiable risk factors also include a personal history of allergies, a personal history of chronic diseases (especially hypertension and diabetes), and a history of COVID‐19 infection within the previous year.

The predominant clinical features of the post‐COVID gastro‐intestinal syndrome include abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, constipation, and vomiting. A review has interpreted these long‐term digestive symptoms that are consistent with IBS as being caused by the infection itself or by various drugs used in the context of acute COVID, especially lopinavir and ritonavir. 17

4.3. Modifiable risk factors

Modifiable risk factors include an abnormal BMI (whether high or low), smoking, a protein‐ or fat‐rich diet, and drinking caffeine beverages.

In our study, we found that acceptable physical activity is associated with a lower incidence of IBS. In the same context, a randomized controlled trial that included 102 IBS patients found that moderate to vigorous activity 3–5 days a week in these patients resulted in clinical improvement of the IBS symptoms. 18

A recent study described the association between heavy smoking (20 or more cigarettes per day) and the occurrence of IBS‐D. This can be explained by the direct effects of nicotine on colonic motor function, mediated by nicotine receptors on intrinsic and extrinsic colonic nerves. 19 , 20

Regarding diet, a Western diet high in fat has been associated with IBS in a large French cohort. 21 Several mechanistic hypotheses have been put forward to explain this association, including an enhanced colonic response to lipids. 22 Previous studies have also shown that the use of soluble fibers (e.g., oats and fruits) results in symptom improvement. 23 However, insoluble fibers (e.g., wheat bran) were not of significant and even caused abdominal bloating. 24

Living in a rural area and working in certain jobs are also modifiable risk factors for IBS. In our study, health workers were less likely to be patients than other professions. This could be due to doctors' and nurses' knowledge of the etiology and preventive ways of this disease; however, more studies are needed on this aspect.

4.4. Clinical implications

Here are some highlights of the clinical implications and potential strategies based on the findings from this cross‐sectional study on IBS prevalence and risk factors:

Clinical implications:

  • The high IBS prevalence (25.2%) demonstrates this is a major chronic digestive disease burden in developing countries that needs focused attention.

  • Positive associations with modifiable factors like diet, smoking, activity levels, and so forth underscore the potential for lifestyle management.

  • Protective effect seen in healthcare workers reinforces the value of patient education and awareness.

Potential strategies:

  • Increaseing IBS awareness and screening practices in primary care in developing countries to improve early diagnosis.

  • Lifestyle counseling by dieticians, social workers, and community health workers on diet, activity, and sleep hygiene.

  • Smoking cessation programs and resources for patients with IBS where relevant.

  • Self‐management workshops on stress reduction techniques like yoga, meditation, and cognitive behavioral therapies for IBS patients.

  • Culturally appropriate educational campaigns on IBS using diverse platforms to reach rural areas.

  • Policy efforts to promote physical activity through built environment changes in developing country urban areas.

In summary, the high disease burden calls for greater health system prioritization and lifestyle‐based management with tailored sociocultural approaches to curb preventable risk factors.

4.5. Potential confounding variables

  • Age—IBS prevalence increased with age. Age may confound associations between other factors and IBS.

  • Gender—Females had a higher IBS prevalence. Gender differences could confound other observed relationships.

  • Comorbidities—Chronic diseases like diabetes and hypertension were associated with higher IBS prevalence. These may confound other variables.

  • Medications—Drugs used for comorbid conditions could influence IBS risk, confounding associations.

  • Diet—Dietary patterns like high fat/protein diet were associated with IBS. Diet may be a confounder.

  • Physical activity—Lack of adequate activity was linked to higher IBS prevalence. This could confound other observations, especially in the outcomes of certain jobs.

4.6. Limitations of the study

Our study's importance comes from the fact that most of the included countries have not had sufficient data regarding IBS prevalence before. Nonetheless, there were some limitations. In terms of the population, despite the variety of nationalities included in the study, more than half of the participants were from Syria. We tried to overcome this by including participants from different geographical areas and different socioeconomic backgrounds. Also, most of the population was Caucasian; other ethnicities were represented by much fewer ratios. This is because Caucasians are the predominant ethnicity in the included countries. Furthermore, most of the included countries had a Muslim majority, so we could not clearly study the association between alcohol consumption and IBS. Finally, our study is cross‐sectional; we were able to study the association between several factors and IBS. However, a cohort study is still needed to further ascertain this association and examine its magnitude.

This cross‐sectional study may reflect the prevalence and risk factors of IBS in low‐ and middle‐income countries. Individuals living in high‐income countries were not included in this study.

5. CONCLUSION

The prevalence of IBS appears to be higher in low‐ and middle‐income countries (mean = 25.2%, range [6.2%–44.2%]) than in high‐income countries, with a higher prevalence among Africans than Caucasians and Asians. In addition to the previously known risk factors for IBS, such as female sex, smoking, psychological stress, and chronic fatigue. Other risk factors were discovered, such as chronic diseases, including high blood pressure and diabetes, allergies to some substances, previous infection with COVID‐19, and first‐degree patients with IBS. There are also some other modifiable risk factors, such as an abnormal BMI (whether high or low), smoking, a protein‐ or fat‐rich diet, drinking caffeine‐containing beverages, and poor physical activity.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Ahmad Y. Arnaout: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; project administration; supervision; validation; writing—original draft; writing—review & editing. Yaman Nerabani: Conceptualization; methodology; validation; writing—original draft; writing—review & editing. Zain Douba: Supervision. Luma Haj Kassem: Formal analysis; validation; writing—review & editing. khaled arnaout: data curation; formal analysis; validation. Muhammad B. Shabouk: Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. Hussein Zayat: Data curation; formal analysis. Wafik Mayo: Writing—original draft; writing—review & editing. Yamen Bezo: Writing—original draft; writing—review & editing. Ibrahim Arnaout: Data curation; writing—original draft. Ahmad Yousef: Supervision. Mohamed B. Zeina: Formal analysis; validation. Ziad Aljarad: Supervision; validation.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT

The lead author Yaman Nerabani affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors acknowledge Mr. Muhammad Moutaz Al‐Shaghel, a medical student from the University of Aleppo, for his work as a graphic designer in the study. We are also thankful to the PRIBS study team and all the patients who participated in this study. There is no funding for this research.

Coauthors for PRIBS Study Team
Country Coauthor Name Email ORCID Task
Syria Abd Alazeez Atli abdalazizatli@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐7951‐3869 Data collection
Syria Ahmad Chehabi dodishehabi@hotmail.com 0000‐0003‐4181‐8282 Data collection
Syria Ahmad Haj Asaad ahmadhajasaad999@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐5926‐7461 Data collection
Syria Ahmad Hanino www.ahmadhanino2@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐9382‐2238 Data collection
Syria Ahmad Khaled ak8213886@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐6881‐0005 Data collection
Syria Ahmad Nahawi Ahmdnhwy136@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐8622‐3819 Data collection
Syria Alaa Hawarah alaa.mha19@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐2605‐8070 Data collection
Syria Alhasan Alkhayer alhasan.alkhayer9@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐3197‐7231 Data collection
Syria Ali Abbas aliasaadabbas.97@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐8023‐3992 Data collection
Syria Ali Mahmoud Ahmad Ali.0932820336@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐1881‐8754 Data collection
Syria Amana Kezze amana.k6be.careful@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐1683‐9241 Data collection
Syria Ameena Odeh ameena.odeh@hotmail.com 0000‐0002‐5401‐8041 Data collection
Syria Bashar Bazkke bashar.bazkke@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6097‐9220 Data collection
Syria Besher Alhadi Asadi Besher.asadi@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐3760‐5551 Data collection
Syria Danya Mourad danyamourad@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐3541‐0205 Data collection
Syria Elissa abd elfattah smile4ever691998@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐5126‐0804 Data collection
Syria Esraa Jlelatie esraa.jlelatie@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐6862‐3920 Data collection
Syria Ezeddin Dabbagh ezzalldin.da@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐1229‐8380 Data collection
Syria Fahima Taleb fahimataleb62@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐2075‐9239 Data collection
Syria Ghina Jamil Majed jamilmajid2016@hotmail.com 0000‐0002‐3906‐3776 Data collection
Syria Haidar Barakat haidar0barakat@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐0017‐4679 Data collection
Syria Halla Barri barrihalla@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐0167‐2960 Data collection
Syria Hasan Ali Maroush hassan.marouch1998@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐8313‐9283 Data collection
Syria Hayat al. Agha hayat.a.alagha@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐2276‐7005 Data collection
Syria Heba Cheikh Othman hebashekhothman@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐9727‐9719 Data collection
Syria Hiba Allah Sarraj www.hibasarraj@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐9159‐9148 Data collection
Syria Ibrahim Khezaran ibrahim.khezaran98@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐8351‐0994 Data collection
Syria Jaber Baki Zada jaber.b.k.z.q.q@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6442‐6973 Data collection
Syria Joudy Om Alola Sheet joudy.sheet@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐0192‐4654 Data collection
Syria Lana Almahairi lanaalmahairy@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐2308‐9928 Data collection
Syria Layal Alshiekh alsheikhlayal@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐9401‐5451 Data collection
Syria Maen Al‐Najjar maen.alnajjar2860@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐7658‐0561 Data collection
Syria Mahmoud Koritbi mahmoudkoritby@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6031‐312X Data collection
Syria Majd‐Aldin Sabhan majood.m.sbhan@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐1814‐3766 Data collection
Syria Marah Khalil marooha.99@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐0702‐449X Data collection
Syria Mawya Alrawi mawya2001alrawi@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐1544‐2306 Data collection
Syria Mofida Ghannam mofidaghannam00@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐2428‐7005 Data collection
Syria Mohamad Ali Farho ali_fa_2001@hotmail.com 0000‐0002‐3277‐2270 Data collection
Syria Mohamad Al‐mahdi Al‐kurdi mohammedmahdikurdi@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐1858‐8450 Data collection
Syria Mohamad Nabhan Sawas mo.nabhan.sa@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐4060‐6755 Data collection
Syria Mohamad Sbeinati mohamad.sbeinati@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐8308‐3590 Data collection
Syria Mohamad Shehab Alyousfi mohammadshehabalyousfi@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐0005‐0898 Data collection
Syria Mohammad Ahmad Faksh mohammadfaksh658@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐8378‐8021 Data collection
Syria Mohammad ali alkouje mohamed.alkouje@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐5062‐5100 Data collection
Syria Mohammad Alkhawalda mjkhawaldeh@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐7260‐7707 Data collection
Syria Mohammad Shahrour mohammadshahrour21@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐7506‐9924 Data collection
Syria Mohanad Daher muhanaddaher8@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐0617‐6280 Data collection
Syria Monzer keblawy monzerkeblawi@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐9075‐2446 Data collection
Syria Nour Halwani nourhalwanii99@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐3025‐4330 Data collection
Syria Nour Jreikh nour2000j1@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6987‐0635 Data collection
Syria Ola Alkhallouf olakhallouf472@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐4657‐9666 Data collection
Syria Omar Najjar omarnajjar934@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐0488‐9826 Data collection
Syria Qusai Razzouk qusayr2000@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐9540‐1100 Data collection
Syria Raghad Sawas raghadsawas96@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐8122‐533X Data collection
Syria Rama Aboudan rama.11aboudan@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐1618‐7071 Data collection
Syria Rama Summak RSummak@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐1960‐1135 Data collection
Syria Rama Zannerni ramazannerni3@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐8908‐8966 Data collection
Syria Ramez Shahin ramezshahin4@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐8854‐3453 Data collection
Syria Rand Ibrahim roroibrahim1722@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐4415‐2060 Data collection
Syria Razan hajjouz razanhajjouz1998@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐8084‐7495 Data collection
Syria Saffana krayem Saffana.krayem99@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐0066‐593X Data collection
Syria Sally Korini s.0958371433@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐5329‐8240 Data collection
Syria Sami abedalkader Abedalkader samialmofty.7@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐0785‐2770 Data collection
Syria Sana Oubari sanaoubari1999@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐2342‐9734 Data collection
Syria Sanaa Nahhas sanaanahhas@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐3180‐3984 Data collection
Syria Sedra Kreid Sidra.kd.2000@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐4043‐3436 Data collection
Syria Shahd Maan Alamoura shahed.maam@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐4889‐2525 Data collection
Syria Shahd Maarrawi shahdmaarrawi@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐4075‐5526 Data collection
Syria Shahd Merhej Shahdmerhej2002@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐2521‐7623 Data collection
Syria Sherine hagi shamou sherinecomputer@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐0643‐7142 Data collection
Syria Siham Alabrash sihamalabrash@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐2060‐6056 Data collection
Syria Somar Berro somerberro@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6443‐9408 Data collection
Syria Tala Jouma Alhejazi talahij1432@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6272‐4184 Data collection
Syria Turfa Moudarres turfaaa99@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐1519‐4859 Data collection
Syria Walaa Qirata walaaqirata@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐8533‐4621 Data collection
Syria Yahya Smadi yahyasamady.1997@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐8660‐9313 Data collection
Syria Yasmeen saeed rajab yasmynrjb66@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐0612‐7857 Data collection
Syria Youmen Srajaldeen yomensrajaldeen@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐2988‐8416 Data collection
Syria Rami Anadani ramianadani99@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐5461‐4241 Data collection
Syria Reem Kozum reem.kozum.1998@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐8143‐9140 Data collection
Syria Othman Sheikh Hussein othmanshiekhhussain@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐8228‐7898 Data collection
Egypt Mustafa Alsebaei mustafaalsebaei08@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐7250‐5428 Data collection
Egypt Abdelrahman Shawky Refaee abdorefaee@yahoo.com 0000‐0002‐1981‐9425 Data collection/National lead
Egypt Albaraa Daradkeh elbaraa.mahmoud1901@alexmed.edu.eg 0000‐0002‐8282‐8236 Data collection
Egypt Alshaymaa Mortada Ali Eltohry alshaymaaali62@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6867‐8326 Data collection
Egypt Azza Osama abdelmetaal alqurei azzausama47@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐5436‐8818 Data collection
Egypt Donia Amgad Farhat donia_farhat@yahoo.com 0000‐0003‐1379‐1908 Data collection
Egypt Eslam Mohamad Elshennawy eslam_alshenawy@med.kfs.edu.eg 0000‐0003‐1410‐7784 Data collection
Egypt Fatma Yousef abdelaziz abo elnaga batayousef03@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐9534‐5444 Data collection
Egypt Ghada Mahmoud Hussien Eid ghadamahmoud088@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐7606‐4364 Data collection
Egypt Marwa Mahmoud Soliman Sabaa marwa_sabaa@yahoo.com 0000‐0003‐3885‐0943 Data collection
Egypt Mo'men Mohamed Roshdy moemenroshdy2016@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐3803‐0817 Data collection
Egypt mohamed said abdelkader koreitam m_korietum@yahoo.com 0000‐0003‐0342‐9550 Data collection
Egypt Neamt Mahmoud Amin Hassan sakr Neamtsakr@yahoo.com Data collection
Egypt Radwa Eletr radwa.atef41@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐5040‐2417 Data collection
Pakistan Abdul Basit abdulbasitrauf97@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐2189‐080X Data collection
Pakistan Aleena Batool aleenabatool114@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6235‐3643 Data collection
Pakistan Anshahrah Riaz anshahrahriaz8@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐4568‐7307 Data collection
Pakistan Aqsa Iqbal aqsaiqbal965@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐4719‐6058 Data collection
Pakistan Ibad ur Rehman ibadrehmaan@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐9639‐0741 Data collection
Pakistan Izma Ajaz izmaajaz@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐6287‐0031 Data collection
Pakistan Namrah Anwer nemo_anwer@outlook.com 0000‐0003‐4374‐3843 Data collection
Pakistan Syeda Tahira Waheed tahirahashmi20@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐1478‐1309 Data collection
Pakistan Warda khan warda.khan4902@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐3104‐1433 Data collection
Sudan Abobakr Abdallah Mohamed Osman abobakr97abdallah11@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐3400‐6561 Data collection
Sudan Abubakr Elsadig Musa Muhammed abubakr35007@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐2658‐000X Data collection
Sudan Albushra Altayeb Adam Osman albushraaltayeb@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6594‐8730 Data collection
Sudan Asjad Hassan Eltayeb Shamseldeen jody.hassan26@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐7486‐3912 Data collection
Sudan Esraa Hammad AbdAllah Ageeb toriageeb302@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐5376‐8465 Data collection
Sudan Fatima Mohamed Awad Osman fatmo4160@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐1563‐7296 Data collection
Sudan Maysoon Nagmeldin Mursi Mohamedshafee maysoony99@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6273‐8543 Data collection
Sudan Moaz Noureldin Easa El Tayeb moaznoreldeen@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐5821‐295X Data collection
Sudan Mohamed Alghazali mhghazally@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐5465‐5366 Data Collection
Sudan Mohamed hassan Tagelkhatim Mohamed mo7.alves1994@hotmail.com 0000‐0003‐2097‐4585 Data collection
Sudan Rawnag Ali Mubarak Ali www.rawnag888@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐5940‐5155 Data collection
Sudan Sarah Ahmed Alhassan saraosama797@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐4813‐0539 Data collection
Sudan Taqwa Elyas Altahir Alshaikh taqwaleyas@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6811‐3456 Data collection
Libya Ayman abulrassul Hasan aboulqassim alsharifayman1986@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6244‐8618 Data collection
Libya Eshrak Saad Ahmed Splendoure94@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐1486‐0226 Data collection/National lead
Libya Huda Ahmed Muftah Aqmati hudaaqmati852@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6988‐8253 Data collection
Libya Khwla F. Magid khwlafadil34@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐5189‐0088 Data collection
Libya Moufiq abdulrasoul Hasan aboulqassim mowfagoz@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐8015‐8611 Data collection
Libya Zinelabedin Mohamed Zen_zen47@yahoo.com 0000‐0003‐0133‐809X Data collection/National lead
Libya Najat Ahmed Hashem Mohammed najatahmed003@gmail.com Data collection
Algeria Rais Mohammed Amir raismohammedamir@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐1290‐4379 Data collection/National lead
Algeria Assia Salah assia-salah@outlook.fr 0000‐0003‐0619‐5243 Data collection
Algeria Djedidi Lamis djedidilamis@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐6162‐8868 Data collection
Algeria Ihcene Gourari contact.ihcene@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐8900‐9527 Data collection
Algeria Manare kahoul kahoulmanare@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐3780‐8292 Data collection
Algeria Rayane Dorbane m20414@univ-constantine3.dz 0000‐0001‐5618‐2366 Data collection
Algeria ABDERRAZAK MOHAMMED med.abderrazak@yahoo.com 0000‐0003‐4474‐1292 Data collection
Jordan Ahmad Alshkirat ahm0190145@ju.edu.jo 0000‐0002‐7005‐4229 Data collection
Jordan Ghalib Nashaat El Hunjul ghalibhunjul@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐4439‐7519 Data collection
Jordan Hashem Altabbaa hashem0908@hotmail.com 0000‐0002‐8031‐838X Data collection
Jordan Laith Shakhatreh laithshakhatreh99@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐9060‐3942 Data collection
Jordan Mo'ath Al‐Hazaimeh spaceking1999@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐9666‐7808 Data collection
Jordan Sereen khasawneh sereen-2000@hotmail.com 0000‐0002‐8503‐6218 Data Collection
India Dhruv Tewari bukshukchin2@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐5886‐8089 Data collection
India Rachana Reddy Dasireddy rachanadasireddyksrr@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6154‐9134 Data collection
India Rishabh Kapil kapilrishabh09@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐6999‐489X Data collection
Yemen Dua Hassan Hassan Mohammed Abu‐Ali doctorduaa331@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐0174‐7782 Data collection
Yemen Abdulghani Ahmed Ali Al‐Aswadi abdulghanialaswadi1@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐7469‐8606 Data collection
Saudi Arabia Ahmed Mohamed ahmadalfadel777@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐5996‐7097 Data collection
United Arab Emirates Haya Mohammed Zakaria Mashhadi hayamzm@gmail.com 0000‐0002‐5480‐478X Data collection
Morocco Boukhiam Meriem boukhiameriem@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐5828‐1456 Data collection
Palestine Bashar Mohamed AlHennawi bashar.hennawi@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐9357‐6233 Data collection
Iraq Israa Abduljaleel Al‐fayyadh israa.med@hotmail.com 0000‐0003‐2352‐3771 Data collection
Serbia Abd Alrazak Albasis abdulrazzakalbasis99@gmail.com 0000‐0003‐0943‐4051 Data collection
Serbia Abdalmoeen Yousef Albasis Aboodalbasis@gmail.com 0000‐0001‐7155‐5853 Data collection

Arnaout AY, Nerabani Y, Douba Z, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of irritable bowel syndrome (PRIBS study) among adults in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A multicenter cross‐sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2023;6:e1592. 10.1002/hsr2.1592

PRIBS Study Team: Co‐authors participated in data collection and National Lead.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data used for this article will be made publicly available after publishing all research papers that our team aim to do. However, if other researchers wish to request access to these data or require additional information, they should communicate with the corresponding author.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Schoenfeld PS. Advances in IBS 2016: a review of current and emerging data. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;12(8 suppl 3):S1‐S11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Quigley EMM, Fried M, Gwee KA, et al. World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines irritable bowel syndrome a global perspective update September 2015. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;50:704‐713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Defrees DN, Bailey J. Irritable bowel syndrome. Primary Care: Clini Off Pract. 2017;44:655‐671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Daabiss M. American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(2):111‐115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. WHO Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) Analysis Guide. WHO; 2012:1‐22. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cohen S . Perceived Stress Scale. 1994.
  • 8. Jackson C. The Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ 11). Occup Med. 2015;65:86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. S. Chandrasekhar FRS, Ikhsanto LN. jurusan teknik mesin. guidelines for implementation. Liq Cryst. 2020;21:1‐17. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Husain N, Chaudhry I, Jafri F, Niaz S, Tomenson B, Creed F. A population‐based study of irritable bowel syndrome in a non‐Western population. Neurogastroenterol Motility. 2008;20(9):1022‐1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. El Sharawy SM, Amer IF, Elkadeem MZ. Irritable bowel syndrome in Egyptian medical students, prevalence and associated factors: a cross‐sectional study. Pan Afr Med J. 2022;41:311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bercik P, Verdu EF, Collins SM. Is irritable bowel syndrome a low‐grade inflammatory bowel disease? Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2005;34(2):235‐245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Chumpitazi BP, Shulman RJ. Underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms in childhood irritable bowel syndrome. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2016;3:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Garcia‐Etxebarria K, Zheng T, Bonfiglio F, et al. Increased prevalence of rare sucrase‐isomaltase pathogenic variants in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:1673‐1676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Henström M, Diekmann L, Bonfiglio F, et al. Functional variants in the sucrase‐isomaltase gene associate with increased risk of irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2018;67:263‐270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zielińska M, Fichna J, Bashashati M, et al. G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor and estrogen receptor ligands regulate colonic motility and visceral pain. Neurogastroenterol Motility. 2017;29:e13025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Raveendran AV, Jayadevan R, Sashidharan S. Long COVID: an overview. Diab Metab Syndr: Clin Res Rev. 2021;15:869‐875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Johannesson E, Simrén M, Strid H, Bajor A, Sadik R. Physical activity improves symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:915‐922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Talley NJ, Powell N, Walker MM, et al. Role of smoking in functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome: three random population‐based studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021;54:32‐42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Meier R, Beglinger C, Dederding JP, et al. Influence of age, gender, hormonal status and smoking habits on colonic transit time. Neurogastroenterol Motility. 1995;7:235‐238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Buscail C, Sabate JM, Bouchoucha M, et al. Western dietary pattern is associated with irritable bowel syndrome in the French nutrinet cohort. Nutrients. 2017;9:986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Feinle‐Bisset C, Azpiroz F. Dietary lipids and functional gastrointestinal disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:737‐747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Moayyedi P, Andrews CN, MacQueen G, et al. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019;2:6‐29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Vasant DH, Paine PA, Black CJ, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2021;70:1214‐1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data used for this article will be made publicly available after publishing all research papers that our team aim to do. However, if other researchers wish to request access to these data or require additional information, they should communicate with the corresponding author.


Articles from Health Science Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES