Skip to main content
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1993 Dec;2(4):228–231. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.4.228

Hospital pharmacists' participation in audit in the United Kingdom.

S Cotter 1, M McKee 1, N Barber 1
PMCID: PMC1055151  PMID: 10132456

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To investigate systematically participation in audit of NHS hospital pharmacists in the United Kingdom. DESIGN--Questionnaire census survey. SETTING--All NHS hospital pharmacies in the UK providing clinical pharmacy services. SUBJECTS--462 hospital pharmacies. MAIN MEASURES--Extent and nature of participation in medical, clinical, and pharmacy audits according to hospital management and teaching status, educational level and specialisation of pharmacists, and perceived availability of resources. RESULTS--416 questionnaires were returned (response rate 90%). Pharmacists contributed to medical audit in 50% (204/410) of hospitals, pharmacy audit in 27% (108/404), and clinical audit in only 7% (29/404). Many pharmacies (59% (235/399)) were involved in one or more types of audit but few (4%, (15/399)) in all three. Participation increased in medical and pharmacy audits with trust status (medical audit: 57% (65/115) trust hospital v 47% (132/281) non-trust hospital; pharmacy audit: 34% (39/114) v 24% (65/276)) and teaching status (medical audit: 58% (60/104) teaching hospital v 47% (130/279) non-teaching hospital; pharmacy audit 30% (31/104) v 25% (68/273)) and similarly for highly qualified pharmacists (MPhil or PhD, MSc, diplomas) (medical audit: 54% (163/302) with these qualifications v 38% (39/103) without; pharmacy audit: 32% (95/298) v 13% (13/102)) and specialists pharmacists (medical audit: 61% (112/184) specialist v 41% (90/221) non-specialist; pharmacy audit: 37% (67/182) v 19% (41/218)). Pharmacies contributing to medical audit commonly provided financial information on drug use (86% 169/197). Pharmacy audits often concentrated on audit of clinical pharmacy services. CONCLUSION--Pharmacists are beginning to participate in the critical evaluation of health care, mainly in medical audit.

Full text

PDF
228

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Batty R., Barber N. Ward pharmacy: a foundation for prescribing audit? Qual Health Care. 1992 Mar;1(1):5–9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cotter S., McKee M., Barber N. Pharmacists and prescribing: an unrecorded influence. Qual Health Care. 1993 Jun;2(2):75–76. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.2.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eccles S., Barber N., Frater A., Wilson P. A better pill to swallow. Health Serv J. 1992 Apr 16;102(5298):22–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Proctor S. J. Why clinical research needs medical audit. Qual Health Care. 1993 Mar;2(1):1–2. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sandler D. A., Heaton C., Garner S. T., Mitchell J. R. Patients' and general practitioners' satisfaction with information given on discharge from hospital: audit of a new information card. BMJ. 1989 Dec 16;299(6714):1511–1513. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6714.1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES