Skip to main content
LGBT Health logoLink to LGBT Health
. 2023 Oct 4;10(7):560–565. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2022.0307

Analysis of Smartphone Text Data Related to mpox from a U.S. Sample of Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men During the 2022 Outbreak

Cory J Cascalheira 1, Chenglin Hong 2,3, Raiza M Beltran 2, Kimmo Karkkainen 4, Mehrab Beikzadeh 4, Majid Sarrafzadeh 4, Ian W Holloway 2,4,
PMCID: PMC10552145  PMID: 37219872

Abstract

Purpose:

We sought to understand technology-based communication regarding mpox (monkeypox) among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) during the global outbreak in 2022.

Methods:

Forty-four GBMSM (Mage = 25.3 years, 68.2% cisgender, 43.2% non-White) living in the United States participated. From May 2022 to August 2022, all text data related to mpox (174 instances) were downloaded from the smartphones of GBMSM. Text data and smartphone app usage were analyzed.

Results:

Content analysis revealed 10 text-based themes and 7 app categories. GBMSM primarily used search and browser, texting, and gay dating apps to share vaccine updates, seek mpox vaccination, find general mpox information, share mpox information with other GBMSM, and discuss links between mpox and gay culture. Data visualizations revealed that changes in communication themes and app usage were responsive to major milestones in the mpox outbreak.

Conclusion:

GBMSM used apps to facilitate a community-driven mpox response.

Keywords: bisexual, gay, LGBTQ, monkeypox, mpox, social networking

Introduction

During the 2022 mpox (i.e., monkeypox) outbreak, cases were reported in >100 countries,1 including >30,000 cases in the United States.2 Mpox cases were reported predominantly among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM),3 a population already disproportionately affected by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic.4 In California, for instance, ∼95% of the reported cases were among GBMSM.5 Public health prevention strategies included scaling up vaccination and increasing testing capacity.6 However, leveraging GBMSM's fluency in computer-mediated communication was an underutilized prevention strategy for mpox in particular and future infectious diseases more broadly.

GBMSM increasingly use web-based smartphone applications (e.g., social media, gay dating applications; collectively, “apps”) to connect to their social and sexual networks,7–9 particularly during viral outbreaks.10 Health mobilization through apps came to prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic as the exchange and sharing of informational resources became urgent in the absence of a comprehensive public health response.11 GBMSM began to increase their use of social media, texting, and dating apps (e.g., Hornet) to reduce infection risk12,13 while communicating COVID-19-specific worries and harm-reduction strategies to other GBMSM.10 Despite the prominence of apps in previous disease outbreaks, no study has explored how technology facilitated GBMSM's response to mpox.

The first step in designing real-time adaptive digital interventions for viral risk reduction is to understand how GBMSM use apps to communicate about public health priorities,14 such as mpox. Thus, this study sought to characterize how GBMSM responded to mpox by analyzing text data generated across a variety of apps. We aimed to describe major themes of GBMSM's mpox communication, understand common communication channels among GBMSM related to mpox, and explore temporal variation in major themes and communication channels.

Methods

Procedure

Participants were GBMSM (N = 44) primarily living in the metro area of Los Angeles, California. One participant was living in Indiana. They were drawn from a larger study investigating HIV risk among GBMSM. In the larger study, GBMSM were recruited through advertisements posted on social media and popular dating applications (e.g., Grindr). Participants were eligible for the larger study if they were over age 18 years, used Facebook and at least one gay-specific app (e.g., Scruff), had used a psychoactive substance in the past 3 months, had condomless anal intercourse in the past 6 months, and could read and speak English.

All participants included in this analysis had a smartphone with the Android operating system. Participants consented to install a custom-developed app that tracked their keystrokes using the Aware Framework.15 From May 1, 2022, to August 31, 2022, the keystroke logger saved all text (except sensitive data, such as passwords) participants typed on their smartphone across all apps (e.g., web searches, text messages, and communication on dating apps). To establish the data set on mpox, a search algorithm detected all text input using at least one of the following terms: monkey pox, monkeypox, pox, virus, viruses, orthopox, mpx, gaypox, or CDC.

The data set consisted of the participant's identification number, a time stamp, the app on which the participant entered the text, and the text itself. No identifying information was stored on study servers. The institutional review board of the senior author's institution approved this study. All participants provided informed consent.

Data analytic plan

All descriptive analyses, comparison tests, and visualizations were performed in R version 4.1.3. Two-sided tests of proportion equality were conducted to examine statistically significant differences in proportions (GBMSM who used mpox search terms vs. those who did not). Code and data are available from the first author. To establish themes, we used conventional content analysis.16 The first author coded all smartphone text. To increase trustworthiness,17 the third author audited all themes and the entire team debriefed during group meetings.

Results

Participants were 44 GBMSM (Mage = 25.3 years, standard deviation [SD] = 2.97) who identified as gay (68.2%), bisexual (20.5%), or as some other sexual orientation (11.4%). Over two-thirds of participants identified as cisgender (68.2%), trans men (25.0%), or nonbinary (6.8%). In terms of race/ethnicity, participants identified as White (56.8%), some other race (20.5%), Asian (11.4%), or Black (11.4%) with 84.1% stating they were non-Hispanic. Participants held bachelor's degrees (27.3%), had some college (25.0%), earned a graduate degree (22.7%), had a high school diploma or GED (13.6%), or held an associate's degree (11.4%).

A total of 21 GBMSM (47.7%) used at least one mpox term between May 1, 2022, and August 31, 2022, generating 235 unique instances of text. All 21 participants were recruited before June 4, 2022. Compared with the 23 GBMSM who did not use mpox-related terms, these 21 participants were not statistically significantly more likely to be people of color (χ2[1] = 1.07, p = 0.3), cisgender (χ2[1] = 0.46, p = 0.5), or have a college education (χ2[1] = 1.51, p = 0.2). Content analysis revealed that 74.0% of the posts were related to mpox, 20.4% to a different virus (e.g., chickenpox), 10.2% to COVID-19, and 1.3% to concerns about mpox–COVID-19 coinfection. The remaining results pertain to the 174 text instances coded as related to mpox.

As given in Table 1, content analysis revealed 10 themes related to mpox communication among GBMSM. Themes were not mutually exclusive:

Table 1.

Illustrative Quotes of Monkeypox Themes

Theme % Example quote
Sharing vax update 29.9 I got my monkeypoxvaccine (28-year-old White gay man)
Seeking vax 25.3 is there a vaccine for monkeypox (27-year-old bi-racial gay nonbinary person)
Seeking general info 16.1 how many monkeypox cases in ill (18-year-old White bisexual man)
Sharing info 13.2 On a unrelated note, I have been working with a bunch of people on the internet to compile resources for those looking for possibly getting a monkeypox vaccine. If anyone is interested please DM me (28-year-old White gay man)
mpox + gay 8.1 The CDC announcement heavily centers men who have sex with men. I am not optimistic that the government will actually take this seriously since, historically, viruses impacting MSM are… Ignored, we'll say. Inline graphicInline graphicInline graphicInline graphicInline graphicInline graphicInline graphic (27-year-old White gay trans man)
Seeking health info 7.5 can asymptomatic monkeypox be contagious (29-year-old Asian gay man)
Using caution 6.3 not really hahaha. been avoiding it until i got my monkeypox vax (27-year-old Asian gay man)
General mentions 6.3 monkeypox (28-year-old White gay man)
Negative experience 5.2 too busy and worried about the pox (27-year-old Asian gay man)
Using humor 4.6 Just panicked that my bacne was monkeypox until I remembered I haven't showered in like almost 2 weeks and am on T Inline graphic (27-year-old White bisexual trans man)

Percentage based on 174 instances of text related to mpox.

CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; DM, direct messaging; MSM, men who have sex with men; vax, vaccine.

Sharing Vax Update, or disclosed information about intending to get or receiving the mpox vaccine (29.9%); Seeking Vax, or looked for information on where and when to get the vaccine (25.3%); Seeking General Info, or sought general information about mpox, such as the number of cases in their local community (16.1%); Sharing Info, or shared facts about mpox with their social and sexual networks (13.2%); mpox + Gay, or made or challenged links between gay culture, same-sex behavior, and mpox (8.1%); Seeking Health Info, or sought health-related information, such as what mpox symptoms look like (7.5%); Using Caution, expressed hesitancy to engage in normal activities due to fear of contracting mpox (6.3%); General Mentions, or mentioned mpox generally, such as typing “monkeypox” into Google search (6.3%); Negative Experiences, expressed negative reactions to mpox, such as worry or frustration (5.2%); and Using Humor, or employing mpox-related jokes with social and sexual networks (4.6%).

Figure 1a depicts how the frequency of themes changed over time, overlayed with major news events in California.18 Of note is (1) the increase in searches for vaccines after California requested more vaccines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and (2) the surge in sharing vaccine updates with social and sexual networks after California Governor Gavin Newsom declared mpox a public health emergency (August 1, 2022).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Monkeypox communication themes and channels among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. (a) How the frequency of individual mpox themes changed over time and (b) how this sample of GBMSM used apps to communicate about mpox over time. Major news developments are from Governor Newsom's18 Proclamation of a State of Emergency: CDC announced national vaccine strategy on June 28, 2022, California requested 800,000 doses of JYNNEOS vaccine on July 19, 2022, and Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency on August 1, 2022. App, smartphone applications; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; DM, direct messaging.

Participants used a variety of communication channels (i.e., smartphone apps) to discuss mpox. Many GBMSM used search apps (34.5%; e.g., Firefox), texting and direct messaging apps (26.4%; e.g., Facebook Messenger). They discussed mpox on gay dating apps (14.9%; e.g., Grindr) and major social media apps (14.9%; e.g., Twitter). GBMSM mpox communication was least common on scheduling and calendar (6.9%), miscellaneous (1.7%; e.g., Microsoft Outlook), and news (0.6%) apps.

Figure 1b shows how the frequency of app use changed over time, overlayed with major news events in California.18 Notable observations include (1) a decrease in mpox searches on web browsers around the time the CDC announced its national vaccine strategy and (2) a surge in mpox searches on web browsers, mpox communication through text messaging services, and mpox discussions on gay dating apps after the California Health Department requested 800,000 doses of the JYNNEOS vaccine from the CDC.

Discussion

This article analyzed how GBMSM used digital app-based technology to communicate about mpox during the 2022 outbreak. Notably, GBMSM's interest in mpox vaccination suggests a health-focused community response, which both contrasts the homonegative rhetoric blaming the mpox outbreak on GBMSM19–21 and mirrors the cautious, proactive, and health-focused behavior observed among other samples of GBMSM responding to mpox22 and among GBMSM during the COVID-19 pandemic.10,13,23 Results also suggest that this sample of GBMSM rapidly communicated about mpox to push back against homonegative rhetoric, to direct their peers to health information, and to modify their approaches to sexual networking.

The findings have implications for future digital interventions for viral risk reduction. Because GBMSM are concerned with vaccination, gay dating apps could partner with public health departments to offer geotargeted information on mpox vaccine availability, especially if additional outbreaks or variants emerge. Consistent with other digital interventions,14 public health officials also could partner with computational social scientists to build automated systems that extract meaningful insights from smartphone text data to inform health promotion messaging in real time.

Because communication themes and app use changed over time and seemed to be timed with major news events, public health departments and GBMSM-serving community-based organizations should launch health-oriented social media campaigns around major news events to promote and harness the health-focused communication already in place within GBMSM communities.

Some commentators have expressed concerns that the official U.S. federal response to mpox was inadequate, delayed, and poorly implemented.24 Nevertheless, mpox was brought under control relatively quickly in the United States.25 As suggested by our findings, it is possible that this success in controlling the U.S. outbreak was driven by the rapid health-focused communication within GBMSM networks. Network-based interventions to reduce infectious diseases, such as HIV, among GBMSM are gaining traction in public health research,26 but it is unclear whether steps are being taken to incorporate GBMSM communication networks into a national strategy for emergent diseases such as mpox.

In this study, GBMSM rapidly communicated about mpox shortly after the reported outbreak, communicated during periods of major news reports, and communicated risk mitigation information. These findings suggest that communication networks to reduce the impact of emergent infectious diseases among GBMSM are already present, and can be leveraged to promote effective mitigation strategies during future outbreaks.

However, before public health officials incorporate smartphone text into prevention strategies and digital interventions, how and what kinds of text data are obtained must be considered from an ethical perspective. If national organizations collect smartphone text data through an app, such as the CDC mobile app,27 or aggregate text data across apps (e.g., pulling text data collected by patient portals), then existing technologies would need to be modified to collect these data while stipulations about who has access to the data are created.

Privacy and third-party sharing policies would not only need to prioritize GBMSM's safety and confidentiality, but also center GBMSM's perspectives (e.g., not selling data to third parties, restricting data access to researchers)28 during development. Clear policies on data ownership, data deletion, and data auditing also would need to be developed. In addition, GBMSM would want the ability to determine from which apps text data are sent to public health officials (e.g., turning off data collection from private messaging apps).

It is also unclear, currently, how and to what extent these text data would be anonymized (e.g., removing the names of loved ones). Thus, although GBMSM's communication about mpox and other infectious diseases10,13,23 could be harnessed to promote personal and public health, several important ethical issues need to be resolved and additional research must occur before this possibility becomes reality.

Limitations

There are limitations to this study. First, nearly all participants were from Los Angeles, California, thus limiting generalizability, especially considering that GBMSM living in rural areas use different mpox risk-reduction strategies.29 More research with nonurban non-U.S. GBMSM is needed to understand whether GBMSM use digital technology to communicate about infectious diseases in ways similar to this sample. Second, although examining temporal variation in mpox themes and communication channels seemed to be timed with major mpox-related news events, this study did not test and does not claim causality between news events and changes in GBMSM's mpox communication.

Mpox communication changes among this sample could be due to other variables, such as increased awareness of mpox during the summer of 2022. Longitudinal studies using larger text-based data sets (e.g., social media) and advanced methods (e.g., machine learning)—which enable causal inference30—are needed to infer causality between news events and GBMSM's response to mpox and other disease outbreaks. Finally, because the text data were sent over the internet to our servers, data loss during transit may have occurred, possibly resulting in data availability bias.

Conclusion

This is the first study to examine the role of smartphone apps in facilitating a community-driven response to the mpox outbreak among GBMSM. The findings revealed that GBMSM primarily used search and browser, texting, and gay dating apps to share vaccine updates, seek mpox vaccination, find general mpox-related information, share information with other GBMSM, and discuss links between mpox and gay culture. Changes in communication themes and channels appeared to be responsive to major news events. These findings point toward the possibility of using text data in public health interventions to prevent infectious diseases by leveraging GBMSM communication networks.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by members of the UTECH team. The authors thank the editor and anonymous peer reviewers for their comments.

Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization of the study was carried out of by C.J.C. and I.W.H. Methodology was done by C.J.C., R.M.B., K.K., M.B., and M.S. Software was taken care of by K.K. and M.B. Formal analysis was done by C.J.C. and R.M.B. Investigation was carried out by C.H., K.K., and M.B. Resources were taken care of by I.W.H. and M.S. Data curation was by C.H. and K.K. Writing—original draft was by C.J.C., R.M.B., and C.H. Writing—review and editing was by all authors. Visualization was by C.J.C. Supervision was done by I.W.H. and M.S. Funding acquisition was taken care of by I.W.H.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Funding Information

This research was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (DP2 DA051864). C.J.C. is supported as a RISE Fellow by the National Institutes of Health (R25GM061222).

References

  • 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022 Monkeypox Outbreak Global Map. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA; 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/response/2022/world-map.html [Last accessed: September 15, 2022].
  • 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022 U.S. Map & Case Count. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA; 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/response/2022/us-map.html [Last accessed: March 10, 2023].
  • 3. Philpott D, Hughes CM, Alroy KA, et al. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of monkeypox cases—United States, May 17–July 22, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;2022(71):1018–1022; doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7132e3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Santos GM, Hong C, Wilson N, et al. Persistent disparities in COVID-19-associated impacts on HIV prevention and care among a global sample of sexual and gender minority individuals. Glob Public Health 2022;17(6):827–842; doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2063362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. California Center for Infectious Diseases. Monkeypox Data in California. California Department of Public Health: Sacramento, CA; 2022. Available from: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/Monkeypox-Data.aspx [Last accessed: September 15, 2022].
  • 6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. HHS Orders Additional Vaccine, Increases Testing Capacity to Respond to Monkeypox Outbreak. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC; 2022. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2022/07/15/hhs-orders-additional-vaccine-increases-testing-capacity-to-respond-to-monkeypox-outbreak.html [Last accessed: September 15, 2022].
  • 7. Cascalheira CJ, Smith BA. Hierarchy of desire: Partner preferences and social identities of men who have sex with men on geosocial networks. Sex Cult 2020;24(3):630–648; doi: 10.1007/s12119-019-09653-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Grov C, Breslow AS, Newcomb ME, et al. Gay and bisexual men's use of the Internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013. J Sex Res 2014;51(4):390–409; doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.871626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Seidenberg AB, Jo CL, Ribisl KM, et al. A national study of social media, television, radio, and internet usage of adults by sexual orientation and smoking status: Implications for campaign design. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14(4):450–465; doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cascalheira CJ, Morrison C, D'Angelo AB, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV-positive men who have sex with men: (Dis)connection to social, sexual, and health networks. Psychol Sex 2023;14(1):306–320; doi: 10.1080/19419899.2022.2112745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Littman DM, Boyett M, Bender K, et al. Values and beliefs underlying mutual aid: An exploration of collective care during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Soc Soc Work Res 2022;13(1):89–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Holloway IW, Garner A, Tan D, et al. Associations between physical distancing and mental health, sexual health and technology use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Homosex 2021;68(4):692–708; doi: 10.1080/00918369.2020.1868191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Rhodes SD, Mann-Jackson L, Alonzo J, et al. A rapid qualitative assessment of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a racially/ethnically diverse sample of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men living with HIV in the US South. AIDS Behav 2021;25:58–67; doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-03014-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ovalle A, Goldstein O, Kachuee M, et al. Leveraging social media activity and machine learning for HIV and substance abuse risk assessment: Development and validation study. J Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e22042; doi: 10.2196/22042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ferreira D, Kostakos V, Dey AK. AWARE: Mobile context instrumentation framework. Front ICT 2015;2:6; doi: 10.3389/fict.2015.00006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15(9):1277–1288; doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Morrow SL. Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol 2005;52(2):250–260; doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Newsom G. Proclamation of a State of Emergency. California Office of Governor: Sacramento, CA; 2022. Available from: https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/8.1.22-Monkeypox-SOE-signed.pdf?emrc=2a3e09 [Last accessed: September 15, 2022].
  • 19. Dvorak P. Monkeypox-Fueled Hate Echoes the HIV/AIDS Era, Even in Rainbow Cities. The Washington Post: Washington, DC; 2022. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/08/18/monkeypox-hiv-hate-stigma-dc/ [Last accessed: September 15, 2022].
  • 20. Dsouza VS, Rajkhowa P, Mallya BR, et al. A sentiment and content analysis of tweets on monkeypox stigma among the LGBTQ+ community: A cue to risk communication plan. Dialogues Health 2023;2:100095; doi: 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Keum BT, Hong C, Beikzadeh M, et al. Mpox stigma, online homophobia, and the mental health of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. LGBT Health 2023; doi: 10..1089/lgbt.2022.0281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hubach RD, Owens C. Findings on the monkeypox exposure mitigation strategies employed by men who have sex with men and transgender women in the United States. Arch Sex Behav 2022;51(8):3653–3658; doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02423-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Stephenson R, Sullivan SP, Pitter RA, et al. Are we still having sex? Results of round two of the love and sex in the time of COVID survey with gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav 2022;26(7):2338–2348; doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03580-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Gonsalves GS, Mayer K, Beyrer C. Déjà vu all over again? Emergent monkeypox, delayed responses, and stigmatized populations. J Urban Health 2022;99(4):603–606; doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00671-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Mpox Case Trends Reported to CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA; 2023. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/response/2022/mpx-trends.html [Last accessed: March 6, 2023].
  • 26. Yang X, Fang T, Mobarak SA, et al. Social network strategy as a promising intervention to better reach key populations for promoting HIV prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2020;96(7):485–491; doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2019-054349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Mobile App. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA; 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/digital-social-media-tools/mobile/applications/cdcgeneral/promos/cdcmobileapp.html [Last accessed: March 6, 2023].
  • 28. Rendina HJ, Mustanski B. Privacy, trust, and data sharing in web-based and mobile research: Participant perspectives in a large nationwide sample of men who have sex with men in the United States. J Med Internet Res 2018;20(7):e233; doi: 10.2196/jmir.9019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Owens C, Hubach RD. Rural-urban differences in monkeypox behaviors and attitudes among men who have sex with men in the United States. J Rural Health 2023;39(2):508–515; doi: 10.1111/jrh.12726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Hair JF, Sarstedt M. Data, measurement, and causal inferences in machine learning: Opportunities and challenges for marketing. J Mark Theory Prac 2021;29(1):65–77; doi: 10.1080/10696679.2020.1860683 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from LGBT Health are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES