Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1995 Mar;4(1):5–12. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.5

Mortality league tables: do they inform or mislead?

M McKee 1, D Hunter 1
PMCID: PMC1055259  PMID: 10142037

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To examine certain methodological issues related to the publication of mortality league tables, with particular reference to severity adjustment and sample size. DESIGN--Retrospective analysis of inpatient hospital records. SETTING--22 hospitals in North West Thames health region for the fiscal year 1992-3. SUBJECTS--All admissions with a principal diagnosis of aortic aneurysm, carcinoma of the colon, cervical cancer, cholecystectomy, fractured neck of femur, head injury, ischaemic heart disease, and peptic ulcer. MAIN MEASURES--In hospital mortality rates adjusted by disease severity and calculated on the basis of both admissions and episodes. RESULTS--The numbers of deaths from specific conditions were often small and the corresponding confidence intervals wide. Rankings of hospitals by death rate are sensitive to adjustment for severity of disease. There are some differences that cannot be explained using routine data. CONCLUSIONS--Comparison of crude death rates may be misleading. Some adjustment for differences in severity is possible, but current systems are unsatisfactory. Differences in death rates should be studied, but because of the scope for manipulating data, this should be undertaken in a collaborative rather than a confrontational way. Any decision to publish league tables of death rates will be on political rather than scientific grounds.

Full text

PDF
5

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ballard D. J., Bryant S. C., O'Brien P. C., Smith D. W., Pine M. B., Cortese D. A. Referral selection bias in the Medicare hospital mortality prediction model: are centers of referral for Medicare beneficiaries necessarily centers of excellence? Health Serv Res. 1994 Feb;28(6):771–784. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black N., Johnston A. Volume and outcome in hospital care: evidence, explanations and implications. Health Serv Manage Res. 1990 Jul;3(2):108–114. doi: 10.1177/095148489000300205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gerety M. B., Soderholm-Difatte V., Winograd C. H. Impact of prospective payment and discharge location on the outcome of hip fracture. J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Sep-Oct;4(5):388–391. doi: 10.1007/BF02599687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Green J., Wintfeld N. How accurate are hospital discharge data for evaluating effectiveness of care? Med Care. 1993 Aug;31(8):719–731. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199308000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gulliford M. C., Petruckevitch A., Burney P. G. Hospital case notes and medical audit: evaluation of non-response. BMJ. 1991 May 11;302(6785):1128–1129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6785.1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Iezzoni L. I., Henderson M. G., Bergman A., Drews R. E. Purpose of admission and resource use during cancer hospitalizations. Health Care Financ Rev. 1991 Winter;13(2):29–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Iezzoni L. I. Using administrative diagnostic data to assess the quality of hospital care. Pitfalls and potential of ICD-9-CM. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6(2):272–281. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300000799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kassirer J. P. The use and abuse of practice profiles. N Engl J Med. 1994 Mar 3;330(9):634–636. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199403033300910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Luft H. S., Bunker J. P., Enthoven A. C. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 20;301(25):1364–1369. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197912203012503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Luft H. S. The relation between surgical volume and mortality: an exploration of causal factors and alternative models. Med Care. 1980 Sep;18(9):940–959. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198009000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McKee M., Petticrew M. Disease staging--a case-mix system for purchasers? J Public Health Med. 1993 Mar;15(1):25–36. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Park R. E., Brook R. H., Kosecoff J., Keesey J., Rubenstein L., Keeler E., Kahn K. L., Rogers W. H., Chassin M. R. Explaining variations in hospital death rates. Randomness, severity of illness, quality of care. JAMA. 1990 Jul 25;264(4):484–490. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vickers N., Pollock A. Incompleteness and retrieval of case notes in a case note audit of colorectal cancer. Qual Health Care. 1993 Sep;2(3):170–174. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.3.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES