Skip to main content
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1996 Mar;5(1):36–43. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.1.36

Bone densitometry at a district general hospital: evaluation of service by doctors and patients.

R Madhok 1, P Kirby 1, J Fordham 1, P Stamp 1, S Green 1, C Cooper 1
PMCID: PMC1055352  PMID: 10157271

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess doctors' and patients' views about a district general hospital bone densitometry service and to examine existing practice to influence future provision. DESIGN--Three postal surveys: (a) of doctors potentially using the service, (b) of patients undergoing a bone densitometry test during a six month period, and (c) of the referring doctors of the patients undergoing the test. SETTING--Bone densitometry service at South Cleveland Hospital, Middlesbrough and two district health authorities: South Tees and Northallerton. SUBJECTS--All general practitioners (n=201) and hospital consultants in general medicine, rheumatology, obstetrics and gynaecology, orthopaedics, radio therapy and oncology, haematology, and radiology (n=61); all patients undergoing an initial bone densitometry test (n=309) during a six month period; and their referring doctors. MAIN MEASURES--Service awareness and use, knowledge of clinical indications, test results, influence of test results on patient management, satisfaction with the service and its future provision. RESULTS--The overall response rates for the three surveys were 87%, 70%, and 61%. There was a high awareness of the service among doctors and patients; 219(84%) doctors were aware and 155 of them (71%) had used it, and patients often (40%) suggested the test to their doctor. The test was used for a range of reasons including screening although the general use was consistent with current guidelines. Two hundred (65%) bone densitometry measurements were normal, 71(23%) were low normal, and 38(12%) were low. Although doctors reported that management of patients had been influenced by the test results, the algorithm for decision making was unclear. Patients and doctors were satisfied with the service and most (n=146, 68%) doctors wanted referral guidelines for the service. CONCLUSIONS--There was a high awareness of, use of, and satisfaction with the service. Patients were being referred for a range of reasons and a few of these could not be justified, many tests were normal, and clinical decision making was not always influenced by the test result. It is concluded that bone densitometry services should be provided but only for patients whose management will be influenced by test results and subject to guidelines to ensure appropriate use of the technology.

Full text

PDF
36

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Black D. M., Reiss T. F., Nevitt M. C., Cauley J., Karpf D., Cummings S. R. Design of the Fracture Intervention Trial. Osteoporos Int. 1993;3 (Suppl 3):S29–S39. doi: 10.1007/BF01623005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooper C., Aihie A. Osteoporosis: recent advances in pathogenesis and treatment. Q J Med. 1994 Apr;87(4):203–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cummings S. R., Black D. M., Nevitt M. C., Browner W. S., Cauley J. A., Genant H. K., Mascioli S. R., Scott J. C., Seeley D. G., Steiger P. Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):665–668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cummings S. R., Black D. M., Nevitt M. C., Browner W., Cauley J., Ensrud K., Genant H. K., Palermo L., Scott J., Vogt T. M. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet. 1993 Jan 9;341(8837):72–75. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ettinger B., Genant H. K., Cann C. E. Long-term estrogen replacement therapy prevents bone loss and fractures. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Mar;102(3):319–324. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-3-319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gärdsell P., Johnell O., Nilsson B. E. Predicting fractures in women by using forearm bone densitometry. Calcif Tissue Int. 1989 Apr;44(4):235–242. doi: 10.1007/BF02553757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hui S. L., Slemenda C. W., Johnston C. C., Jr Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Sep 1;111(5):355–361. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-5-355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnston C. C., Jr, Slemenda C. W., Melton L. J., 3rd Clinical use of bone densitometry. N Engl J Med. 1991 Apr 18;324(16):1105–1109. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199104183241606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Madhok R. Audit and research. Lancet. 1992 Oct 31;340(8827):1103–1104. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)93129-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Melton L. J., 3rd, Atkinson E. J., O'Fallon W. M., Wahner H. W., Riggs B. L. Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res. 1993 Oct;8(10):1227–1233. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650081010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Naessén T., Persson I., Adami H. O., Bergström R., Bergkvist L. Hormone replacement therapy and the risk for first hip fracture. A prospective, population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jul 15;113(2):95–103. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-2-95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Truscott J. G., Oldroyd B., Simpson M., Stewart S. P., Westmacott C. F., Milner R., Horsman A., Smith M. A. Variation in lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral measured by dual energy X-ray absorption: a study of 329 normal women. Br J Radiol. 1993 Jun;66(786):514–521. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-786-514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wasnich R. D., Ross P. D., Heilbrun L. K., Vogel J. M. Prediction of postmenopausal fracture risk with use of bone mineral measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Dec 1;153(7):745–751. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90338-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES