Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe preliminary work undertaken for development of a nursing contribution to the Cochrane Collaboration. To ascertain whether there are randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on nursing care which need to be identified for inclusion in systematic reviews of the effects of health care. DESIGN: Searches by Medline (1966-94) and by hand of 11 nursing research journals from inception to the end of 1994 to identify RCTs and systematic reviews; and a comparison of searches by hand and by Medline for three nursing research journals. MAIN MEASURES: Total number of RCTs identified and number of RCTs published in nursing journals; the sensitivity of Medline searches; and aspects of nursing care evaluated by RCT. RESULTS: The work is ongoing and 522 reports of RCTs and 20 systematic reviews of effectiveness have been identified so far. The sensitivity of Medline searches for RCTs in nursing journals is as low as 36% for one journal and the lack of reference to research design in the title or abstract was the main reason for the lack of sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: There are RCTs that evaluate aspects of nursing care, and are published in nursing and non-nursing journals, and are largely undertaken by nurses. These must be reviewed in ongoing systematic reviews of the effects of health care (including those undertaken as part of the Cochrane Collaboration). Nursing journals must be hand searched to identify these studies as the lack of reference to study design in the titles and abstracts of nursing trials leads to poor indexing in electronic databases such as Medline.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chalmers I. The Cochrane collaboration: preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:156–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crowley P., Chalmers I., Keirse M. J. The effects of corticosteroid administration before preterm delivery: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Jan;97(1):11–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb01711.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cullum N., Deeks J. J., Fletcher A. W., Sheldon T. A., Song F. Preventing and treating pressure sores. Qual Health Care. 1995 Dec;4(4):289–297. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.4.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibbings S. Research methods. Informed action. Nurs Times. 1993 Nov 17;89(46):28–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawthorne D. L., Yurkovich N. J. Science, technology, caring and the professions: are they compatible? J Adv Nurs. 1995 Jun;21(6):1087–1091. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.21061087.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oakley A. Who's afraid of the randomized controlled trial? Some dilemmas of the scientific method and "good" research practice. Women Health. 1989;15(4):25–59. doi: 10.1300/j013v15n04_02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]