Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1997 Mar;6(1):35–39. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.1.35

Essential dataset for ambulatory ear, nose, and throat care in general practice: an aid for quality assessment.

T af Klercker 1, E Trell 1, P G Lundquist 1
PMCID: PMC1055442  PMID: 10166601

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the documentation of care for the usual range of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) problems seen in primary care as a basis for developing a computerised information system to aid quality assessment. DESIGN: Descriptive study of the pattern of ENT problems and diagnoses and treatment as recorded in individual case notes. SETTING: The primary health care centre in Mjölby, Sweden. PATIENTS: Consultations for ENT problems from a 10% sample randomly selected from all consultations (n = 22,600) in one year. From this sample 375 consultations for ENT problems (16% of all consultations) by 272 patients were identified. MAIN MEASURES: The detailed documentation of each consultation was retrieved from the individual records and compared with the data required for a computer based information system designed to help in quality management. RESULTS: Although the overall picture gained from the data retrieved from the notes suggested that ENT care was probably adequate, the recorded details were limited. The written case notes were insufficient when compared with the details required for a computerised system based on an essential dataset designed to allow assessment of diagnostic accuracy and appropriateness of treatment of ENT problems in primary care. CONCLUSION: There is a gap between the amount and the type of information needed for accurate and useful quality assessment and that which is normally included in case notes. More detailed information is needed if general practitioners' notes are to be used for regular quality assessment of ENT problems but that would mean more time spent on keeping notes. This would be difficult to justify. IMPLICATIONS: The routine information systems used at this primary healthcare centre did not produce sufficient documentation for quality assessment of ENT care. This dilemma might be resolved by specially designed desktop computer software accessed through an essential dataset.

Full text

PDF
35

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3 Suppl):166–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Flygt C., Homelius B., Jacobsson B., Foldevi M., Trell E. Essential data set for computer management of distributed primary care services. Med Inform (Lond) 1995 Oct-Dec;20(4):331–341. doi: 10.3109/14639239509024286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gabbay J., Layton A. J. Evaluation of audit of medical inpatient records in a district general hospital. Qual Health Care. 1992 Mar;1(1):43–47. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hutchinson A. Designing European minimum data sets for ambulatory care. Med Inform (Lond) 1991 Jan-Mar;16(1):25–27. doi: 10.3109/14639239109025292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Moidu K. Application of an essential data set based computer system in support of maternal and child care. Int J Biomed Comput. 1992 Oct;31(3-4):159–175. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(92)90002-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Moidu K., Singh A. K., Boström K., Chowdhury S., Trell E., Wigertz O., Kjessler B. Towards an essential data set: applicability in the domain of maternal health services. Methods Inf Med. 1992 Sep;31(3):182–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moidu K., Singh A. K., Boström K., Wigertz O., Trell E., Kjessler B. MCHS: an application software for family welfare programmes. Med Inform (Lond) 1992 Oct-Dec;17(4):279–291. doi: 10.3109/14639239209079810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Moidu K., Wigertz O. Computer based information systems in primary health care--why? J Med Syst. 1989 Apr;13(2):59–65. doi: 10.1007/BF00999243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Moidu K., Wigertz O., Trell E. A multicenter study of data collection and communication at primary health care centers. J Med Syst. 1991 Jun;15(3):205–220. doi: 10.1007/BF00996550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moidu K., Wigertz O., Trell E. Multi centre systems analysis study of primary health care: a study of socio-organizational and human factors. Int J Biomed Comput. 1992 Jan;30(1):27–42. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(92)90059-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Måg L., Swartling P. G., Smedby B. Livslång onödig behandling riskeras om inte utredningarna av B12-brist förbättras. Lakartidningen. 1992 Mar 18;89(12):984–986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Palmer H. Measuring clinical performance to provide information for quality improvement. Qual Manag Health Care. 1996 Winter;4(2):1–6. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199600420-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Singh A. K., Moidu K., Trell E., Wigertz O. Impact on the management and delivery of primary health care by a computer-based information system. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1992 Feb;37(1):55–64. doi: 10.1016/0169-2607(92)90029-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. af Klercker T., Trell E., Lundquist P. G. Towards an essential data set for ambulatory otorhinolaryngological care in general practice. Med Inform (Lond) 1994 Jul-Sep;19(3):253–267. doi: 10.3109/14639239409025331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES