Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1997 Sep;6(3):125–130. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.3.125

Longer term quality of life and outcome in stroke patients: is the Barthel index alone an adequate measure of outcome?

P R Wilkinson 1, C D Wolfe 1, F G Warburton 1, A G Rudd 1, R S Howard 1, R W Ross-Russell 1, R Beech 1
PMCID: PMC1055473  PMID: 10173769

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To consider whether the Barthel Index alone provides sufficient information about the long term outcome of stroke. DESIGN: Cross sectional follow up study with a structured interview questionnaire and measures of impairment, disability, handicap, and general health. The scales used were the hospital anxiety and depression scale, mini mental state examination, Barthel index, modified Rankin scale, London handicap scale, Frenchay activities index, SF36, Nottingham health profile, life satisfaction index, and the caregiver strain index. SETTING: South east London. SUBJECTS: People, and their identified carers, resident in south east London in 1989-90 when they had their first in a life-time stroke aged under 75 years. INTERVENTIONS: Observational study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison and correlation of the individual Barthel index scores with the scores on other outcome measures. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty three (42%) people were known to be alive, of whom 106 (86%) were interviewed. The median age was 71 years (range 34-79). The mean interval between the stroke and follow up was 4.9 years. The rank correlation coefficients between the Barthel and the different dimensions of the SF36 ranged from r = 0.217 (with the role emotional dimension) to r = 0.810 (with the physical functioning dimension); with the Nottingham health profile the range was r = -0.189 (with the sleep dimension, NS) to r = -0.840 (with the physical mobility dimension); with the hospital and anxiety scale depression component the coefficient was r = -0.563, with the life satisfaction index r = 0.361, with the London handicap scale r = 0.726 and with the Frenchay activities index r = 0.826. CONCLUSIONS: The place of the Barthel index as the standard outcome measure for populations of stroke patients is still justified for long term follow up, and may be a proxy for different outcome measures intended for the assessment of other domains.

Full text

PDF
125

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bamford J. M., Sandercock P. A., Warlow C. P., Slattery J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1989 Jun;20(6):828–828. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.6.828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brazier J. E., Harper R., Jones N. M., O'Cathain A., Thomas K. J., Usherwood T., Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160–164. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DePaulo J. R., Folstein M. F., Gordon B. Psychiatric screening on a neurological ward. Psychol Med. 1980 Feb;10(1):125–132. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700039659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ebrahim S., Barer D., Nouri F. Use of the Nottingham Health Profile with patients after a stroke. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986 Jun;40(2):166–169. doi: 10.1136/jech.40.2.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P. R. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harwood R. H., Gompertz P., Ebrahim S. Handicap one year after a stroke: validity of a new scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;57(7):825–829. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.7.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harwood R. H., Rogers A., Dickinson E., Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;3(1):11–16. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hatano S. Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. Bull World Health Organ. 1976;54(5):541–553. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hayes V., Morris J., Wolfe C., Morgan M. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults? Age Ageing. 1995 Mar;24(2):120–125. doi: 10.1093/ageing/24.2.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Holbrook M., Skilbeck C. E. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1983 May;12(2):166–170. doi: 10.1093/ageing/12.2.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hunt S. M., McKenna S. P., McEwen J., Backett E. M., Williams J., Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980 Dec;34(4):281–286. doi: 10.1136/jech.34.4.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lush B. The scope of research in geriatric medicine. Age Ageing. 1974 Feb;3(1):1–2. doi: 10.1093/ageing/3.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lyons R. A., Fielder H., Littlepage B. N. Measuring health status with the SF-36: the need for regional norms. J Public Health Med. 1995 Mar;17(1):46–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MAHONEY F. I., BARTHEL D. W. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Robinson B. C. Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index. J Gerontol. 1983 May;38(3):344–348. doi: 10.1093/geronj/38.3.344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Seale C., Davies P. Outcome measurement in stroke rehabilitation research. Int Disabil Stud. 1987;9(4):155–160. doi: 10.3109/03790798709166353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wade D. T., Hewer R. L. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Feb;50(2):177–182. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.50.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wolfe C. D., Taub N. A., Woodrow J., Richardson E., Warburton F. G., Burney P. G. Does the incidence, severity, or case fatality of stroke vary in southern England? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Apr;47(2):139–143. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.2.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Haan R., Aaronson N., Limburg M., Hewer R. L., van Crevel H. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke. 1993 Feb;24(2):320–327. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.2.320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES