Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1988 Nov;88(3):936–942. doi: 10.1104/pp.88.3.936

Antifungal Hydrolases in Pea Tissue 1

II. Inhibition of Fungal Growth by Combinations of Chitinase and β-1,3-Glucanase

Felix Mauch 1,2, Brigitte Mauch-Mani 1,2, Thomas Boller 1
PMCID: PMC1055685  PMID: 16666407

Abstract

Chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase purified from pea pods acted synergistically in the degradation of fungal cell walls. The antifungal potential of the two enzymes was studied directly by adding protein preparations to paper discs placed on agar plates containing germinated fungal spores. Protein extracts from pea pods infected with Fusarium solani f.sp. phaseoli, which contained high activities of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase, inhibited growth of 15 out of 18 fungi tested. Protein extracts from uninfected pea pods, which contained low activities of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase, did not inhibit fungal growth. Purified chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase, tested individually, did not inhibit growth of most of the test fungi. Only Trichoderma viride was inhibited by chitinase alone, and only Fusarium solani f.sp. pisi was inhibited by β-1,3-glucanase alone. However, combinations of purified chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase inhibited all fungi tested as effectively as crude protein extracts containing the same enzyme activities. The pea pathogen, Fusarium solani f.sp. pisi, and the nonpathogen of peas, Fusarium solani f.sp. phaseoli, were similarly strongly inhibited by chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase, indicating that the differential pathogenicity of the two fungi is not due to differential sensitivity to the pea enzymes. Inhibition of fungal growth was caused by the lysis of the hyphal tips.

Full text

PDF
936

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abeles F. B., Bosshart R. P., Forrence L. E., Habig W. H. Preparation and purification of glucanase and chitinase from bean leaves. Plant Physiol. 1971 Jan;47(1):129–134. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.1.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albersheim P., Valent B. S. Host-Pathogen Interactions: VII. Plant Pathogens Secrete Proteins which Inhibit Enzymes of the Host Capable of Attacking the Pathogen. Plant Physiol. 1974 May;53(5):684–687. doi: 10.1104/pp.53.5.684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barkai-Golan R., Mirelman D., Sharon N. Studies on growth inhibition by lectins of Penicillia and Aspergilli. Arch Microbiol. 1978 Feb;116(2):119–121. doi: 10.1007/BF00406026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boller T., Vögeli U. Vacuolar localization of ethylene-induced chitinase in bean leaves. Plant Physiol. 1984 Feb;74(2):442–444. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.2.442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dygert S., Li L. H., Florida D., Thoma J. A. Determination of reducing sugar with improved precision. Anal Biochem. 1965 Dec;13(3):367–374. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(65)90327-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hadwiger L. A., Beckman J. M. Chitosan as a Component of Pea-Fusarium solani Interactions. Plant Physiol. 1980 Aug;66(2):205–211. doi: 10.1104/pp.66.2.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Keen N. T., Yoshikawa M. beta-1,3-Endoglucanase from Soybean Releases Elicitor-Active Carbohydrates from Fungus Cell Walls. Plant Physiol. 1983 Mar;71(3):460–465. doi: 10.1104/pp.71.3.460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mauch F., Hadwiger L. A., Boller T. Antifungal Hydrolases in Pea Tissue : I. Purification and Characterization of Two Chitinases and Two beta-1,3-Glucanases Differentially Regulated during Development and in Response to Fungal Infection. Plant Physiol. 1988 Jun;87(2):325–333. doi: 10.1104/pp.87.2.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mauch F., Hadwiger L. A., Boller T. Ethylene: Symptom, Not Signal for the Induction of Chitinase and beta-1,3-Glucanase in Pea Pods by Pathogens and Elicitors. Plant Physiol. 1984 Nov;76(3):607–611. doi: 10.1104/pp.76.3.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mirelman D., Galun E., Sharon N., Lotan R. Inhibition of fungal growth by wheat germ agglutinin. Nature. 1975 Jul 31;256(5516):414–416. doi: 10.1038/256414a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Molano J., Polacheck I., Duran A., Cabib E. An endochitinase from wheat germ. Activity on nascent and preformed chitin. J Biol Chem. 1979 Jun 10;254(11):4901–4907. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roberts W. K., Selitrennikoff C. P. Isolation and partial characterization of two antifungal proteins from barley. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986 Feb 19;880(2-3):161–170. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(86)90076-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES