Abstract
The activities of meropenem, imipenem, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin were evaluated against 80 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains. Meropenem, imipenem, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin MICs at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited were 0.5, 0.25, 1, and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively. Against penicillin-resistant strains, the best killing activity at cerebrospinal fluid concentrations was obtained with imipenem and ceftriaxone-vancomycin. However, while the killing activity of imipenem was significantly greater than that of meropenem, no significant difference was observed between the activities of meropenem and ceftriaxone-vancomycin.
Meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae carries a high rate of morbidity and mortality in both children and adults. Treatment used to be based on penicillin G or aminopenicillins, but the marked increase in pneumococcal resistance to penicillins in the 1980s (20) led to the use of extended-spectrum cephalosporins as empiric therapy for acute bacterial meningitis (15, 28). There have now been reports of S. pneumoniae strains resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins associated with clinical failure and delayed sterilization of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (6, 7, 13, 16, 26). For example, in France, the rate of isolation of S. pneumoniae strains for which the cefotaxime or ceftriaxone MICs were greater than >0.5 μg/ml from CSF in patients with meningitis in 1995 was 16.4% (14). This means that antibiotic combinations or new classes of antibacterial agents must be assessed for the treatment of pneumococcal meningitis.
The carbapenem class is highly active against common meningeal pathogens. Imipenem is the first member of this class, and its MICs against penicillin-resistant pneumococci are lower than those of other β-lactam agents (27). However, the use of imipenem in meningitis is limited by its adverse effects (29). Meropenem, a novel carbapenem antibiotic structurally related to imipenem, but with fewer adverse effects, penetrates efficiently into the central nervous system (8). Because meropenem is reported to have good activity against penicillin-intermediate and -resistant S. pneumoniae strains (27), we tested its activity against such strains isolated from children with meningitis. We used the time-killing curve method with clinically achievable CSF antibiotic concentrations and a large inoculum to mimic clinical conditions (4). Meropenem was compared to imipenem and, against the most-resistant strains, to ceftriaxone alone and to the ceftriaxone-vancomycin combination, which is recommended for the treatment of penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis (24).
(This work was presented in part at the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, New Orleans, La., 15 to 18 September 1996.)
Eighty serotyped S. pneumoniae strains were studied. All were isolated from CSF of children with meningitis between 1987 and 1997. The MICs of penicillin G, meropenem, imipenem, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin were determined by the dilution method on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood as recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (23). The replicator prong delivered approximately 104 CFU per spot onto a blood agar plate. The concentration at which 90% of the strains were inhibited was defined as the MIC90. Killing activity against 26 previously described strains (11) for which the penicillin G MICs were increased (>0.125 to 2 μg/ml), was determined with microtiter plates (CML, Nemours, France), with an early-log-phase culture adjusted to approximately 106 to 107 CFU/ml in Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 5% lysed defibrinated sheep blood during 5 h of incubation (10). This incubation period was chosen because most of the strains underwent a spontaneous autolysis in vitro. The antimicrobial agents were used at the mean CSF concentration (CC) and fractions of it (CC/2 and CC/4) after administration (two doses at 4 h) of doses currently recommended for the treatment of meningitis, as follows: meropenem, 3 μg/ml (8); imipenem-cilastatin, 2 μg/ml each (21); ceftriaxone, 8.8 μg/ml (17); vancomycin, 2 μg/ml (9). Ceftriaxone was tested alone and in combination with vancomycin, as recommended for the treatment of penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis (24). Colonies were counted by the quadrant method after 1:10 dilution, by plating of 50 μl of each dilution onto blood agar plates with a Spiral Plater system and incubation for 18 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. The detection limit was 4,000 CFU/ml. With the dilutions and the Spiral system used, antimicrobial agent carryover does not interfere with bacterial counts (30). The microdilution method used was initially compared with the macromethod with five strains. The mean difference in bactericidal activity of the antibiotics tested for each strain between the two methods was 0.2 log10 CFU/ml, with a range of −0.15 to +0.5 log10 CFU/ml. Student’s paired t test shows that there was no significant difference between the two methods. Bactericidal activity was defined as a reduction of more than 3 log10 CFU/ml after 5 h of incubation. Results were expressed as means ± standard deviations. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the killing activities of the antibiotics. Post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction were used to test the killing activities of all possible pairs of antibiotics (P values were two tailed and were considered significant when probabilities were less than 0.012).
The penicillin, meropenem, imipenem, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin MICs are reported in Table 1. The serotypes of strains for which penicillin MICs were increased were 6A, 6B, 9V, 14, 15C, 19A, 19F, 23A, and 23F. According to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards criteria, strains were classified as intermediate (0.1 μg/ml ≤ MIC ≤ 1 μg/ml) or resistant (MIC of ≥2 μg/ml) to penicillin, susceptible (MIC of ≤0.12 μg/ml) or intermediate (0.25 μg/ml ≤ MIC ≤ 0.5 μg/ml) to meropenem (data not yet published) and imipenem, susceptible (MIC of ≤ 0.05 μg/ml) or intermediate (MIC of 1 μg/ml) to ceftriaxone, and susceptible (MIC of ≤ 1 μg/ml) to vancomycin. The meropenem, imipenem, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin MIC90s were 0.5, 0.25, 1, and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively.
TABLE 1.
Antimicrobial agent and penicillin susceptibility of isolates (n)a | MIC (μg/ml)b
|
||
---|---|---|---|
Range | 50% | 90% | |
Penicillin | |||
S (29) | 0.016–0.06 | 0.032 | 0.064 |
I (29) | 0.125–1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
R (22) | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Meropenem | |||
S | <0.015–0.06 | 0.015 | 0.06 |
I | <0.015–0.5 | 0.12 | 0.5 |
R | 0.12–0.25 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Imipenem | |||
S | <0.015–0.03 | <0.015 | 0.015 |
I | <0.015–0.25 | 0.06 | 0.25 |
R | 0.12–0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Ceftriaxone | |||
S | 0.015–0.06 | 0.015 | 0.015 |
I | 0.015–0.5 | 0.12 | 0.5 |
R | 0.5–1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Vancomycin | |||
S | 0.125–0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
I | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
R | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
S, susceptible (≤0.06 μg/ml); I, intermediate (0.125 to 1.0 μg/ml); R, resistant (≥2.0 μg/ml). n, number of strains.
50% and 90%, MIC50 and MIC90, respectively.
The killing activities of the antibiotics at the mean CSF antibiotic concentration and fractions of it are reported in Table 2. With all antibiotics tested, alone or in combination, bactericidal activity was observed at 5 h against all strains with penicillin G MICs of <0.5 μg/ml. Against strains with penicillin G MICs of ≥1 μg/ml, killing was significantly lower for the three CSF concentrations for each agent (P = 0.008). The strains for which penicillin G MICs were 2 μg/ml were intermediate to ceftriaxone. The best killing activity against these strains was obtained at 5 h with imipenem and ceftriaxone-vancomycin at the mean concentrations of antibiotic in the CSF (no significant difference between the two [P = 0.04]). However, while the killing activity of imipenem was significantly greater than that of meropenem against the strains for which the penicillin G MICs were highest (P = 10−4), no significant difference was observed between meropenem and ceftriaxone-vancomycin (P = 0.05). Ceftriaxone alone was the least active antibiotic (P > 0.01). For all antibiotics, whether with the mean concentrations in the CSF or fractions of it, we did not observe a significant difference in the killing (P = 0.7).
TABLE 2.
Antibiotic and concn | Change in log10 CFU/ml after incubation with isolates (n) at penicillin G MIC (μg/ml) of a:
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.12 (n = 4) | 0.25 (n = 3) | 0.5 (n = 2) | 1 (n = 4) | 2 (n = 13) | |
Meropenem | |||||
CC (3 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 2.62 ± 0.25 | 2.46 ± 0.25 |
CC/2 (1.5 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 2.50 ± 0.23 | 2.38 ± 0.33 |
CC/4 (0.75 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 2.45 ± 0.20 | 2.36 ± 0.34 |
Imipenem | |||||
CC (2 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 2.90 ± 0.52 | 2.95 ± 0.42 |
CC/2 (1 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 2.95 ± 0.63 | 2.98 ± 0.52 |
CC/4 (0.5 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 2.80 ± 0.67 | 2.91 ± 0.54 |
Ceftriaxone | |||||
CC (8.8 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 3.0 ± 0.3 | 2.45 ± 0.24 | 2.08 ± 0.22 |
CC/2 (4.4 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 1.98 ± 0.25 |
CC/4 (2.2 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 1.90 ± 0.27 |
Ceftriaxone-vancomycinb | |||||
CC (8.8 and 2 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 2.75 ± 0.3 | 2.75 ± 0.32 |
CC/2 (4.4 and 1 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 2.65 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.4 |
CC/4 (2.2 and 0.5 μg/ml) | ≥3.4 | ≥3.4 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 2.60 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.4 |
Values represent mean (± standard deviation) change after 5 h of incubation with isolates at various penicillin MICs.
Concentrations for the ceftriaxone-vancomycin combination are given respectively.
Changes in β-lactam susceptibility among S. pneumoniae isolates have led to recommendations that high-dose cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, combined with vancomycin, be used to treat meningitis in children (24). Alternatively, new therapeutic compounds must be evaluated. In our study, the MIC90s of meropenem, imipenem, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin of penicillin-sensitive, -intermediate, and -resistant pneumococci were consistent with those reported elsewhere (3, 27). On the basis of the MICs, imipenem was the most active β-lactam agent. The MIC90 of meropenem for penicillin-resistant pneumococci was 0.5 μg/ml; it is half that of ceftriaxone. Although small, such a difference may influence the therapeutic response in meningitis, because the concentration of β-lactams in CSF is close to the relevant MICs (12). This is even more important in dexamethasone administration, which by reducing meningeal inflammation, reduces antibiotic diffusion into the CSF (25).
Optimal treatment requires rapid bactericidal activity within the CSF, because delayed CSF sterilization is associated with a poor prognosis and a high risk of sequelae in children (19). We therefore used the time-killing curve method after 5 h of incubation with clinically achievable concentrations in CSF (CC, CC/2, and CC/4) to predict antimicrobial activity in CSF during the first few hours of treatment. The best killing activity of imipenem is in agreement with those of previous reports (1, 10). However, its use for treatment of meningitis is limited because of its seizure activity (29). In contrast, with meropenem, no greater incidence of neurological toxicity in patients with meningitis was reported (5, 18). Meropenem at the mean CSF concentration and fractions of it gave a mean killing activity superior to 2.3 log10 CFU/ml against penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strains after 5 h of incubation. Barakett et al. reported comparable results, despite the use of a different methodology (1, 2). Meropenem had significantly superior killing activity to that of ceftriaxone used alone. Nairn et al. reported similar results in experimental pneumococcal meningitis with resistant strains (22). The bactericidal activity of meropenem was similar to that of ceftriaxone-vancomycin. However, there are concerns over the moderate penetration of the glycopeptide with significant interpatient variability (5). Meropenem has already been tested for the treatment of meningitis in both adults and children (5, 18), but only a very few data for patients infected by cephalosporin-resistant pneumococci are available. Our in vitro data suggest that meropenem may be effective in the treatment of cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis; more clinical data are required in this setting.
REFERENCES
- 1.Barakett V, Lesage D, Delisle F, Richard G, Petit J C. Killing kinetics of imipenem against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;33:1025–1028. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.5.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barakett V, Lesage D, Delisle F, Richard G, Petit J C. Killing kinetics of meropenem against penicillin-resistant pneumococci. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;38:1085–1089. doi: 10.1093/jac/38.6.1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barry A L, Brown S D, Novick W J. In vitro activities of cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefpirome, and penicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2193–2196. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.10.2193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bingen E, Lambert-Zechovsky N, Mariani-Kurdjian P, Doit C, Aujard Y, Fournerie F, Mathieu H. Bacterial count in cerebrospinal fluid of children with meningitis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990;9:278–281. doi: 10.1007/BF01968060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bradley, J. S., and W. M. Scheld. 1997. The challenge of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis: current antibiotic therapy in the 1990s. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:(Suppl. 2):213–221. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 6.Bradley J S, Connor J D. Ceftriaxone failure in meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to beta-lactams antibiotics. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10:871–873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Canton E. Cefotaxime breakpoint for Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:616–617. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.3.616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dagan R, Velghe L, Rodda J L, Klugman K P. Penetration of meropenem into the cerebrospinal fluid in humans with inflamed meninges. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;34:175–179. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.1.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Doit C, Barre J, Cohen R, Bourrillon A, Bingen E the Study Group. Program and abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1996. Bactericidal activity in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of children treated with cefotaxime (CTX) + vancomycin (VAN) against an intermediately cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (Sp) strain, abstr. A105; p. 21. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Doit C P, Bonacorsi S P, Fremaux A J, Sissia G, Cohen R, Geslin P L, Bingen E H. In vitro killing activities of antibiotics at clinically achievable concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from children with meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2655–2659. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.11.2655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fitoussi F, Doit C, Sandin A, Pechinot A, Kazmierczack A, Geslin P, Bingen E. Killing activity of cefpirome against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from patients with meningitis in a pharmacodynamic model simulating the cerebrospinal fluid concentration profile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2560–2563. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.11.2560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Friedland I R, Paris M, Ehrett S, Hickey S, Olsen K, McCracken G H., Jr Evaluation of antimicrobial regimens for treatment of experimental penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1630–1636. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.8.1630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Friedland I R, Shelton S, Paris M, Rinderknecht S, Ehrett S, Krisher K, McCracken G H., Jr Dilemmas in diagnosis and management of cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993;12:196–200. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199303000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Geslin P. Centre National de Référence des Pneumocoques. Rapport d’activité année 1994–1995. Centre National des Pneumocoques; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jackson M A, Mithal Y, Robins-Browne R M, Gaspar M N, Koornhof H J. Relatively penicillin-resistant pneumococcal infections in pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1984;3:129–132. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198403000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.John C C. Treatment failure with use of third-generation cephalosporin for penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis: case report and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:188–193. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.2.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Klugman K P, Friedland I R, Bradley J S. Bactericidal activity against cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in cerebrospinal fluid of children with acute bacterial meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1988–1992. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.9.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Klugman K P, Dagan R the Meropenem Meningitis Study Group. Randomized comparison of meropenem with cefotaxime for treatment of bacterial meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1140–1146. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.5.1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lebel M H, McCracken G H., Jr Delayed cerebro-spinal fluid sterilization and adverse outcome of bacterial meningitis in infants and children. Pediatrics. 1989;83:161–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mason E O, Jr, Kaplan S L, Lamberth L B, Tillman J. Increased rate of isolation of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in a children’s hospital and in vitro susceptibilities to antibiotics of potential therapeutic use. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:1703–1707. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.8.1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Modai J, Vittecocq D, Decazes J M, Meulemans A. Penetration of imipenem and cilastatin into cerebrospinal fluid of patients with bacterial meningitis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985;16:751–755. doi: 10.1093/jac/16.6.751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nairn, K., G. L. Shepherd, and J. R. Edwards. 1995. Efficacy of meropenem in experimental meningitis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 36(Suppl. A):73–84. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 23.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard M7-A4. Villanova, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Paris M M, Ramilo O, McCracken G H., Jr Management of meningitis caused by penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2171–2175. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.10.2171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Paris M M, Hickey S M, Uscher M I, Shelton S, Olsen K D, McCracken G H., Jr Effect of dexamethasone on therapy of experimental penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1320–1324. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.6.1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sloas M M, Barrett F F, Chesney P J, English B K, Hill B C, Tenover F C, Legiadro R J. Cephalosporin treatment failure in penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992;11:662–666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Spangler S K, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C. Susceptibilities of 177 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to FK 037, cefpirome, cefepime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, imipenem, biapenem, meropenem, and vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:898–900. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.4.898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weingarten R D, Markiewicz Z, Gilbert D N. Meningitis due to penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in adults. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12:118–124. doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.1.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wong V K, Wright H T, Jr, Ross L A, Mason W H, Inderlied C B, Kim K S. Imipenem/cilastatin treatment of bacterial meningitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10:122–125. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199102000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yourassowsky E, Van der Linden M P, Crokaert F, Glupezynski Y. Effect of antibiotics carry-over on bacterial counting by “spiral plating.”. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988;21:138–140. doi: 10.1093/jac/21.1.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]