Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1989 Feb;89(2):569–576. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.2.569

Thermotolerance Is Developmentally Dependent in Germinating Wheat Seed 1

Rollin H Abernethy 1,2, David S Thiel 1,2, Nancy S Petersen 1,2, Kenneth Helm 1,2
PMCID: PMC1055883  PMID: 16666584

Abstract

During the initial 9 to 12 hours of imbibition, the imbibing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed was found to exhibit substantial tolerance to high temperature relative to later times of imbibition. Tolerance was assessed by seed viability and seedling growth. This initial high temperature tolerance gradually declines with increasing time of seed imbibition. A range of 2 hour heat pretreatments (38-42°C) prior to imposition of a 2 hour heat shock (51-53°C) during this same 9 to 12 hour interval was unable to increase survival or seedling growth over that of seed that did not receive a pretreatment. However, after 9 to 12 hours of imbibition the pretreatment provided both increased survival and increased seedling growth, measured 120 hours later, i.e., classical thermotolerance could be acquired. This response is called a `thermotolerance transition.' Isolated embryos responded in a similar manner using a 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride assay for viability determination following heat treatments. The high temperature tolerance during early imbibition indicates that the thermotolerance transition involves the loss of an existing thermotolerance coincident with acquiring the ability to become thermotolerant following heat pretreatment. Despite the inability to acquire thermotolerance, heat shock protein synthesis was induced by heat shock immediately upon imbibition of wheat seed or isolated embryos. Developmentally regulated heat shock proteins of 58 to 60, 46, 40, and 14 kilodaltons were detected at 1.5 hours of imbibition following heat shock, but were absent or greatly reduced by 12 hours. Constitutive synthesis of 70 and 90 kilodalton hsp groups appeared to be greater at 1.5 hours of imbibition than at 12 hours of imbibition.

Full text

PDF
569

Images in this article

574Figure 2
on p.574

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buzin C. H., Petersen N. S. A comparison of the multiple Drosophila heat shock proteins in cell lines and larval salivary glands by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jun 25;158(2):181–201. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90428-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooper P., Ho T. H., Hauptmann R. M. Tissue specificity of the heat-shock response in maize. Plant Physiol. 1984 Jun;75(2):431–441. doi: 10.1104/pp.75.2.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gerner E. W., Schneider M. J. Induced thermal resistance in HeLa cells. Nature. 1975 Aug 7;256(5517):500–502. doi: 10.1038/256500a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hallberg R. L., Kraus K. W., Hallberg E. M. Induction of acquired thermotolerance in Tetrahymena thermophila: effects of protein synthesis inhibitors. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Aug;5(8):2061–2069. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.8.2061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Heikkila J. J., Kloc M., Bury J., Schultz G. A., Browder L. W. Acquisition of the heat-shock response and thermotolerance during early development of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1985 Feb;107(2):483–489. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90329-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. JOHNSTON F. B., STERN H. Mass isolation of viable wheat embryos. Nature. 1957 Jan 19;179(4551):160–161. doi: 10.1038/179160b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Key J. L., Lin C. Y., Chen Y. M. Heat shock proteins of higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3526–3530. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lin C. Y., Roberts J. K., Key J. L. Acquisition of Thermotolerance in Soybean Seedlings : Synthesis and Accumulation of Heat Shock Proteins and their Cellular Localization. Plant Physiol. 1984 Jan;74(1):152–160. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.1.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Loomis W. F., Wheeler S. Heat shock response of Dictyostelium. Dev Biol. 1980 Oct;79(2):399–408. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90125-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McAlister L., Finkelstein D. B. Heat shock proteins and thermal resistance in yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1980 Apr 14;93(3):819–824. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(80)91150-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morange M., Diu A., Bensaude O., Babinet C. Altered expression of heat shock proteins in embryonal carcinoma and mouse early embryonic cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Apr;4(4):730–735. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.4.730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Farrell P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1975 May 25;250(10):4007–4021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Petersen N. S., Mitchell H. K. Recovery of protein synthesis after heat shock: prior heat treatment affects the ability of cells to translate mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Mar;78(3):1708–1711. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.3.1708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Scharf K. D., Nover L. Heat-shock-induced alterations of ribosomal protein phosphorylation in plant cell cultures. Cell. 1982 Sep;30(2):427–437. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90240-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sherwood S. W., Daggett A. S., Schimke R. T. Interaction of hyperthermia and metabolic inhibitors on the induction of chromosome damage in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Cancer Res. 1987 Jul 1;47(13):3584–3588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thompson E. W., Lane B. G. Relation of protein synthesis in imbibing wheat embryos to the cell-free translational capacities of bulk mRNA from dry and imbibing embryos. J Biol Chem. 1980 Jun 25;255(12):5965–5970. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Werner-Washburne M., Stone D. E., Craig E. A. Complex interactions among members of an essential subfamily of hsp70 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;7(7):2568–2577. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.7.2568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Williamson J. D., Quatrano R. S. ABA-Regulation of Two Classes of Embryo-Specific Sequences in Mature Wheat Embryos. Plant Physiol. 1988 Jan;86(1):208–215. doi: 10.1104/pp.86.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES