Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 21.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2023 Sep 21;389(12):1147–1148. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2300805

Effectiveness of Smallpox Vaccination to Prevent Mpox in Military Personnel

Boghuma K Titanji 1, Angelia Eick-Cost 2, Vincent C Marconi 3
PMCID: PMC10559046  NIHMSID: NIHMS1933001  PMID: 37733313

TO THE EDITOR:

During the ongoing global outbreak of mpox (formerly called monkeypox), smallpox vaccines have been used to prevent infection and reduce the severity of disease in those at increased risk for infection.1 However, the effectiveness of smallpox vaccines against mpox is unknown.

We conducted a retrospective, test-negative case–control study among current and former U.S. military personnel to determine the effectiveness of smallpox vaccines against mpox. From 2002 through 2017, more than 2.6 million U.S. military personnel had received smallpox vaccinations (Dryvax, ACAM2000, or JYNNEOS vaccines) as part of their military deployment or occupational requirements. We aggregated two data sources — the Department of Defense electronic laboratory data and the Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse — to identify eligible participants. The study was approved by the institutional review board of Emory University and was granted an exemption for consent.

Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the association between a positive test result for orthopoxvirus species (which include smallpox, cowpox, and mpox, among other viruses) and previous receipt of a smallpox vaccine. We included age, race, sex, and HIV status as potential confounders in the final model. Among the participants tested in the VA, the severity of disease was defined as admission to a hospital for mpox; this information was not available for participants outside a VA facility. Analyses were conducted with the use of R software, version 4.0.3. Further details regarding the study design and results are provided in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.

From July 1 to October 31, 2022, a total of 1014 current military personnel and veterans who had presented with a clinical syndrome concerning for mpox and who had undergone testing for orthopoxvirus were included in the analyses. Of these participants, 184 (18%) had a documented history of previous smallpox vaccination. Among the 293 participants (29%) who tested positive for orthopoxvirus, 10 (3%) had been vaccinated with Dryvax (a first-generation smallpox vaccine) and 20 (7%) had been vaccinated with ACAM2000 (a second-generation smallpox vaccine). The median time from receipt of the smallpox vaccination to the diagnosis of mpox was 13 years (interquartile range, 6 to 20).

Participants who had received smallpox vaccination were less likely to test positive for mpox than those with no record of vaccination (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 to 0.58 with Dryvax; odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.42 with ACAM2000) (Table 1). The estimated vaccine efficacy was 72% for Dryvax and 75% for ACAM2000. Among the participants who tested positive for orthopoxvirus, 121 (41%) had been diagnosed with HIV infection (odds ratio, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.35). Within the VA portion of the study, 19 of 186 participants (10%) required hospitalization; there were no deaths from mpox, and all the participants had an uneventful recovery.

Table 1.

Risk of Human Mpox Diagnosis, According to Subgroup.

Variable Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Unadjusted Adjusted*
Vaccine type
 ACAM2000 0.44 (0.26–0.70) 0.25 (0.15–0.42)
 Dryvax 0.39 (0.19–0.75) 0.28 (0.13–0.58)
Age group
 35–44 yr 0.96 (0.67–1.37) 0.84 (0.55–1.28)
 45–64 yr 0.50 (0.36–0.70) 0.34 (0.23–0.49)
 ≥65 yr 0.05 (0.02–0.11) 0.04 (0.01–0.08)
Race or ethnic group
 Black 1.73 (1.26–2.40) 1.29 (0.90–1.87)
 Hispanic 1.24 (0.83–1.85) 1.00 (0.64–1.55)
 Other or unknown 1.34 (0.74–2.36) 0.90 (0.46–1.66)
Male sex 7.39 (3.28–21.18) 6.83 (2.95–19.89)
HIV diagnosis 2.89 (2.15–3.89) 2.34 (1.65–3.35)
*

The logistic regression model was adjusted for age, race, sex, and HIV status.

Race or ethnic group was reported by the participants. White race was used as the reference group in this analysis.

Previous vaccination at a median of 13 years earlier with either a first- or second-generation smallpox vaccine reduced the likelihood of testing positive for orthopoxvirus among current or former military personnel for whom vaccination data were available.

Supplementary Material

supplement

Acknowledgments

Supported by a grant (821-SD-ID-41942) from VA SHIELD, a grant (821-SD-ID-41942, to Dr. Young-Zu) from VA SEQCURE, a grant (P30AI050409, to Dr. Marconi) from Emory CFAR, and a grant (P30AI050509) from Emory CFAR and from the Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health program of the National Institutes of Health (to Dr. Titanji).

Footnotes

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.

Contributor Information

Boghuma K. Titanji, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

Angelia Eick-Cost, Department of Defense, Silver Spring, MD

Vincent C. Marconi, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, GA

References

  • 1.Petersen BW, Harms TJ, Reynolds MG, Harrison LH. Use of vaccinia virus smallpox vaccine in laboratory and health care personnel at risk for occupational exposure to orthopoxviruses — recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;6 5: 257–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplement

RESOURCES