Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1989 Mar;89(3):1011–1018. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.3.1011

Plastid Transcription Activity and DNA Copy Number Increase Early in Barley Chloroplast Development 1

Brian J Baumgartner 1, Jeffrey C Rapp 1, John E Mullet 1
PMCID: PMC1055959  PMID: 16666609

Abstract

Plastid transcription activity and DNA copy number were quantified during chloroplast development in the first foliage leaf in dark-grown and illuminated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seedlings. Primary foliage leaves of seedlings given continuous illumination from 2 days post-imbibition reached a final mean length of 15 centimeters at 6.5 days, whereas primary leaves of dark-grown seedlings required 7 days to reach a similar length. Dividing cells were observed in the basal 0.5 to 1 centimeter of primary leaves until 5.5 days post-imbibition. Plastids isolated from cells located in the basal meristem of 4-day-old seedlings were small (∼2 micrometers in diameter), exhibited low transcription activity and contained approximately 130 copies of plastid DNA per organelle. Cell size increased from 18 to 60 micrometers in a 1 to 3 centimeter region located adjacent to the leaf basal meristem. In this region, transcriptional activity per plastid increased 10-fold and DNA copy number increased from 130 to 210. Plastid transcriptional activity declined rapidly in illuminated plants with increasing leaf cell age and plastid DNA copy number also declined but with a slower time course. In dark-grown seedlings, plastid transcriptional activity declined more slowly than in illuminated plants while DNA copy number remained constant with increasing cell age. These data show that plastid transcriptional activity and DNA copy number increase early in chloroplast development and that transcriptional activity per DNA template varies up to 5-fold during barley leaf biogenesis.

Full text

PDF
1011

Images in this article

1015Figure 4
on p.1015
1015Figure 6
on p.1015

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Apel K., Bogorad L. Light-induced increase in the activity of maize plastid DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Eur J Biochem. 1976 Aug 16;67(2):615–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976.tb10727.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bendich A. J. Why do chloroplasts and mitochondria contain so many copies of their genome? Bioessays. 1987 Jun;6(6):279–282. doi: 10.1002/bies.950060608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett J., Radcliffe C. Plastid DNA replication and plastid division in the garden pea. FEBS Lett. 1975 Aug 15;56(2):222–225. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(75)81096-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boffey S. A., Ellis J. R., Selldén G., Leech R. M. Chloroplast Division and DNA Synthesis in Light-grown Wheat Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1979 Sep;64(3):502–505. doi: 10.1104/pp.64.3.502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boffey S. A., Leech R. M. Chloroplast DNA levels and the control of chloroplast division in light-grown wheat leaves. Plant Physiol. 1982 Jun;69(6):1387–1391. doi: 10.1104/pp.69.6.1387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boffey S. A., Selldén G., Leech R. M. Influence of Cell Age on Chlorophyll Formation in Light-grown and Etiolated Wheat Seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1980 Apr;65(4):680–684. doi: 10.1104/pp.65.4.680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brambl R. Mitochondrial biogenesis during fungal spore germination. Development of cytochrome c oxidase activity. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1977 Jul;182(1):273–281. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(77)90308-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Deng X. W., Gruissem W. Control of plastid gene expression during development: the limited role of transcriptional regulation. Cell. 1987 May 8;49(3):379–387. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90290-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Klein R. R., Mullet J. E. Control of gene expression during higher plant chloroplast biogenesis. Protein synthesis and transcript levels of psbA, psaA-psaB, and rbcL in dark-grown and illuminated barley seedlings. J Biol Chem. 1987 Mar 25;262(9):4341–4348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klein R. R., Mullet J. E. Regulation of chloroplast-encoded chlorophyll-binding protein translation during higher plant chloroplast biogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1986 Aug 25;261(24):11138–11145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kolodner R., Tewari K. K. Molecular size and conformation of chloroplast deoxyribonucleic acid from pea leaves. J Biol Chem. 1972 Oct 10;247(19):6355–6364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lamppa G. K., Bendich A. J. Changes in Chloroplast DNA Levels during Development of Pea (Pisum sativum). Plant Physiol. 1979 Jul;64(1):126–130. doi: 10.1104/pp.64.1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lawrence M. E., Possingham J. V. Microspectrofluorometric Measurement of Chloroplast DNA in Dividing and Expanding Leaf Cells of Spinacia oleracea. Plant Physiol. 1986 Jun;81(2):708–710. doi: 10.1104/pp.81.2.708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lukens J. H., Mathews D. E., Durbin R. D. Effect of tagetitoxin on the levels of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, ribosomes, and RNA in plastids of wheat leaves. Plant Physiol. 1987 Jul;84(3):808–813. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.3.808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mullet J. E., Klein R. R. Transcription and RNA stability are important determinants of higher plant chloroplast RNA levels. EMBO J. 1987 Jun;6(6):1571–1579. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02402.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rigby P. W., Dieckmann M., Rhodes C., Berg P. Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. J Mol Biol. 1977 Jun 15;113(1):237–251. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90052-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Robertson D., Laetsch W. M. Structure and function of developing barley plastids. Plant Physiol. 1974 Aug;54(2):148–159. doi: 10.1104/pp.54.2.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thompson R. J., Mosig G. Stimulation of a Chlamydomonas chloroplast promoter by novobiocin in situ and in E. coli implies regulation by torsional stress in the chloroplast DNA. Cell. 1987 Jan 30;48(2):281–287. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90431-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES