Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1998 Jun;42(6):1350–1354. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.6.1350

β-Lactamases Responsible for Resistance to Expanded-Spectrum Cephalosporins in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Proteus mirabilis Isolates Recovered in South Africa

J D D Pitout 1,, K S Thomson 1,*, N D Hanson 1, A F Ehrhardt 1, E S Moland 1, C C Sanders 1
PMCID: PMC105602  PMID: 9624474

Abstract

Although resistance to the expanded-spectrum cephalosporins among members of the family Enterobacteriaceae lacking inducible β-lactamases occurs virtually worldwide, little is known about this problem among isolates recovered in South Africa. Isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Proteus mirabilis resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins recovered from patients in various parts of South Africa over a 3-month period were investigated for extended-spectrum β-lactamase production. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by standard disk diffusion and agar dilution procedures. Production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases was evaluated by using the double-disk test, and the β-lactamases were characterized by spectrophotometric hydrolysis assays and an isoelectric focusing overlay technique which simultaneously determined isoelectric points and general substrate or inhibitor characteristics. DNA amplification and sequencing were performed to confirm the identities of these enzymes. The P. mirabilis and E. coli isolates were found to produce TEM-26-type, SHV-2, and SHV-5 extended-spectrum β-lactamases. An AmpC-related enzyme which had a pI of 8.0 and which conferred resistance to cefoxitin as well as the expanded-spectrum cephalosporins was found in a strain of K. pneumoniae. This is the first study which has identified organisms producing different extended-spectrum β-lactamases from South Africa and the first report describing strains of P. mirabilis producing a TEM-26-type enzyme. The variety of extended-spectrum β-lactamases found among members of the family Enterobacteriaceae isolated from major medical centers in South Africa is troubling and adds to the growing list of countries where these enzymes pose a serious problem for antimicrobial therapy.


The production of β-lactamases is an important mechanism of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics among gram-negative bacteria. Expanded-spectrum cephalosporins have been specifically designed to resist degradation by the older broad-spectrum β-lactamases such as TEM-1, TEM-2, and SHV-1. The response to the expanded-spectrum cephalosporins among members of the family Enterobacteriaceae lacking inducible β-lactamases has been the production of mutant forms of the older β-lactamases called extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). These enzymes are capable of hydrolyzing the newer cephalosporins and aztreonam (11). Studies by biochemical and molecular techniques indicate that many ESBLs are derivatives of older TEM-1, TEM-2, or SHV-1 β-lactamases, some of which differ from the parent enzyme by only one or two amino acids (11). In addition, resistance to the expanded-spectrum cephalosporins has also arisen in Klebsiella pneumoiae and Escherichia coli via the acquisition of plasmids containing the chromosomally encoded AmpC β-lactamase found in Enterobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Citrobacter spp. (3, 25, 26).

Although ESBL-producing members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were first reported in Europe in 1983 and 1984, ESBLs have now been found in organisms recovered from patients on all continents except Antarctica (14, 27). The occurrence of organisms producing ESBLs varies widely, with some types more prevalent in Europe (TEM-3) and others more prevalent in the United States (TEM-10, TEM-12 and TEM-26), while others appear worldwide (SHV-2 and SHV-5) (30).

Reports concerning the existence of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae producing ESBLs in Africa have been limited to Saharan countries, and information from sub-Saharan Africa is scarce. Members of the family Enterobacteriaceae producing SHV-2 have been isolated from three different African countries, namely, Tunisia (6), Senegal (29), and Egypt (29), while TEM-3, TEM-20, and TEM-21 have also been recovered from Tunisia (6). K. pneumoniae strains resistant to the expanded-spectrum cephalosporins were the cause of a nosocomial outbreak in South Africa in the late 1980s, but the mechanism of resistance was not described (9). Resistance to the expanded-spectrum cephalosporins has also been observed in other species of the family Enterobacteriaceae such as E. coli and Proteus mirabilis. Therefore, a study was designed to characterize and describe the mechanisms responsible for resistance to the expanded-spectrum cephalosporins among clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and P. mirabilis recovered from various medical centers in South Africa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.

During a period of 3 months in 1993, 37 strains of K. pneumoniae (13 blood, 5 burn, 7 wound, and 11 tracheal isolates), 4 strains of P. mirabilis (all wound isolates), and 4 strains of E. coli (1 blood, 1 burn, and 2 wound isolates) were collected from patients at the following medical centers in South Africa: Tygerberg Hospital near Cape Town, King Edward VIII Hospital in Durban, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital in Soweto, and Pretoria Academic Hospital in Pretoria. The strains were provided in response to a request for all strains of the family Enterobacteriaceae that lacked inducible β-lactamases and that were intermediate or resistant to cefotaxime or ceftazidime. The total number of strains screened is unknown, and at this time the referring hospitals did not perform more sensitive screening tests for ESBL detection. Therefore, accurate prevalence data were not obtained.

Thirty-four of the 43 patients involved (including all from whom isolates from blood were obtained) had received an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin during the 4 weeks prior to isolation of the organisms described above. Fifteen patients (including eight patients from whose blood isolates were obtained) were receiving either cefotaxime or ceftazidime at the time that the isolates were cultured and were considered not to be responding to these agents.

Susceptibility testing and antibiotics.

Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by standard disk diffusion (21) and agar dilution (20) procedures. Standard powders of the following antimicrobial agents were kindly provided by the indicated companies: piperacillin and tazobactam, Lederle Laboratories (Wayne, N.J.); cefoxitin and imipenem, Merck (Rathway, N.J.); cefotaxime, Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Somerville, N.J.); ceftazidime, Glaxo Group Research Ltd. (Greenford, England); and aztreonam and cefepime, Bristol-Myers Squibb (Princeton, N.J.). Disks for the agar diffusion procedures were obtained from Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems (Cockeysville, Md.). For quality control purposes, the following quality control strains were run simultaneously with the test organisms: E. coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, E. coli ATCC 35218, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213. Throughout this study, results were interpreted by using the criteria of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for disk diffusion (21) and broth dilution (20) procedures.

Double-disk test.

All the strains were screened for the production of ESBLs by using the double-disk test as described by Jarlier et al. (15). A potentiation of the zones of cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, or aztreonam by clavulanic acid represented a positive test result and was indicative of the possible presence of an ESBL.

β-Lactamase characterization.

Overnight cultures in 5 ml of Trypticase soy broth were diluted with 45 ml of fresh broth and were incubated with shaking for 4 h at 37°C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C, washed with 1 M potassium-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), suspended, and sonicated. After sonication, crude extracts were obtained by centrifugation at 5,858 × g for 1 h. One strain, K. pneumoniae Pit 68, with a suspected AmpC β-lactamase, was induced with cefoxitin as described previously (28). The rates of hydrolysis of 100 μM solutions of nitrocephin, cephalothin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam were determined by spectrophotometric assays with crude β-lactamase extracts (23).

The β-lactamases in the sonic extracts were assessed for pIs and general substrate and inhibitor characteristics in polyacrylamide gels (4, 18, 31). As controls, crude β-lactamase preparations from the following organisms possessing different TEM and SHV enzymes were examined simultaneously with the K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and P. mirabilis strains: TEM-1 [from E. coli RTEM(R6K)], TEM-2 [from E. coli 1752E(RP1)], TEM-10 [from E. coli C600(pK2)], TEM-26 [from E. coli HB101(pJPQ101), SHV-1 [from E. coli J53(R1010)], SHV-2 (from Klebsiella ozaenae 2180), SHV-3 [from E. coli J53(pUD18)], SHV-4 [from E. coli J53-2(pUD21)], and SHV-5 [from E. coli ClaNal(pAFF2)].

DNA amplification by PCR.

The organisms were inoculated into 5 ml of Luria-Bertani broth (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) and incubated for 20 h at 37°C with shaking. Cells from 1.5 ml of an overnight culture were harvested by centrifugation at 17,310 × g in a Hermle centrifuge for 5 min. After the supernatant was decanted, the pellet was resuspended in 500 μl of distilled water. The cells were lysed by heating at 95°C for 10 min, and cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 17,310 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was used as a source of template for amplification.

The following oligonucleotide primers specific for the SHV and TEM genes were designed by using MacVector, version 4.5 (Kodak/IBI): for SHV genes, A [5′-(CACTCAAGGATGTATTGTG)-3′] and B [5′-(TTAGCGTTGCCAGTGCTCG)-3′] corresponding to nucleotide numbers 103 to 121 and 988 to 970, respectively, of Mercier and Levesque (19); for TEM genes, C [5′-(TCGGGGAA ATGTGCGCG)-3′] and D [5′-(TGCTTAATCAGTGAGGCACC)-3′] corresponding to nucleotide numbers 90 to 105 and 1062 to 1042, respectively, of Sutcliffe (34). Primers A and B amplified a 885-bp fragment, while primers C and D amplified a 971-bp fragment. The specificities of the SHV and TEM primers for amplification of SHV and TEM genes, respectively, were tested by using the following β-lactamase controls; TEM-1 (pACYC177), MIR-1 (from K. pneumoniae 96D), and SHV-7 (pCLL3410).

PCR amplifications were carried out on a DNA Thermal Cycler 480 instrument (Perkin-Elmer, Cetus, Norwalk, Conn.) with the Gene Amp DNA amplification kit containing AmpliTaq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, N.J.). The composition of the reaction mixture was as follows: 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, each of the four deoxynucleoside triphosphates at a concentration of 0.2 mM, and 1.2 U of AmpliTaq in a total volume of 49 μl. A total of 1 μl of sample lysate was added to the reaction mixture, and the mixture was centrifuged briefly before 50 μl of mineral oil was layered onto the surface. The PCR program consisted of an initial denaturation step at 96°C for 15 s, followed by 24 cycles of DNA denaturation at 96°C for 15 s, primer annealing at 50°C for 15 s, and primer extension at 72°C for 2 min. After the last cycle the products were stored at 4°C. The PCR products (1/10 volume) were analyzed by electrophoresis with 1.4% agarose gels in TAE buffer (0.04 M Tris-acetate, 0.002 M EDTA [pH 8.5]). The gels were stained with ethidium bromide, and the PCR products were visualized with UV light. A single band was observed for TEM amplified products with a single primer set. Two amplified products were observed with the SHV primer set. The larger product, which corresponded to the expected size of the SHV-specific product, was gel purified with a 1.4% agarose gel in TAE buffer, and the purified PCR product was used for sequence analysis.

PCR products were sequenced by automated PCR cycle sequencing with dye-terminator chemistry by using a DNA stretch sequencer from Applied Biosystems.

RESULTS

Resistance phenotypes.

All the strains except K. pneumoniae Pit 68 gave a positive disk potentiation when cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, aztreonam, and/or ceftazidime disks were used. The MICs of piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, aztreonam, and cefoxitin revealed three different resistance phenotypes (Kpn1, Kpn2, and Kpn3) in the K. pneumoniae strains and two resistance phenotypes (Ec1 and Ec2) in E. coli strains (Table 1). The phenotypes Kpn1 and Ec1 involved high-level resistance to ceftazidime (MICs, >128 μg/ml) but susceptibility to cefotaxime (MIC range, 0.25 to 1 μg/ml), while Kpn2 and Ec2 involved decreased susceptibility to both cefotaxime (MIC range, 4 to 64 μg/ml) and ceftazidime (MIC range, 4 to 128 μg/ml). Kpn3, represented by K. pneumoniae Pit 68, involved resistance to cefoxitin (MIC, >128 μg/ml) and decreased susceptibility to cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam (MICs ≥2 μg/ml) (Table 1). The P. mirabilis isolates showed decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime (MIC range, 16 to 64 μg/ml) and susceptibility to cefotaxime (MIC range, 0.25 to 0.5 μg/ml).

TABLE 1.

MICs for the different resistance phenotypes observed in K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and P. mirabilis

Species and resistance phenotype No. of strains MIC range (μg/ml)a
pip tzp ctx caz atm fox fep imi
K. pneumoniae
 Kpn1 8 >128 2–4 0.25–1 >128 16–64 2–4 0.12 0.12
 Kpn2 28 >128 2–>128 4–64  4–128 1–128 2–8 0.5–4 0.12–1
 Kpn3 1 64 16  4 4  2 >128 0.12 0.12
E. coli
 Ec1 3 >128  1  1 >128 16 4 0.12 0.12
 Ec2 1 >128 32 16 4  2 8 2 0.12
P. mirabilis 4 128 0.25–0.5 0.25–0.5 16–64 0.5–2 2–4 2  0.5–1
a

pip, piperacillin; tzp, piperacillin-tazobactam (4 μg/ml); ctx, cefotaxime; caz, ceftazidime; atm, aztreonam; fox, cefoxitin; fep, cefepime; imi, imipenem. 

β-Lactamases.

Strains representing the Kpn1 and Ec1 phenotypes produced β-lactamases with pI values of 5.6 and 7.6 respectively, while phenotype Kpn2 and Ec2 involved enzymes with pIs of 5.4, 7.6, and 8.2 (Table 2). K. pneumoniae Pit 68, representing phenotype Kpn3, produced two β-lactamases with pIs of 5.4 and 8.0, respectively. The P. mirabilis strains showed a single enzyme with a pI of 5.6 (Table 2). The enzymes with pIs of 5.4, 5.6, 7.6, and 8.2 aligned with TEM-1 (pI 5.4), TEM-10 or TEM-26 (pI 5.57), SHV-1, SHV-2, or SHV-8 (pI 7.6), and SHV-5 (pI 8.2) (Table 2). It was therefore necessary to investigate these enzymes further. On isoelectric focusing gels, all of the β-lactamases except for the enzyme with a pI of 8.0 were inhibited by clavulanate, a characteristic of Bush group 2 enzymes (8). The enzyme with a pI of 8.0 was inhibited by cloxacillin, which correlates with Bush group 1 cephalosporinases (8). The substrate-based technique showed hydrolysis of 0.75 μg cefotaxime per ml at the bands focusing at pIs of 5.6, 8.0, and 8.2 and for some enzymes at the bands focusing at a pI of 7.6 (Table 2). Control enzymes of TEM-10, TEM-26, SHV-2, and SHV-5 showed hydrolysis of cefotaxime in this assay (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Characteristics of β-lactamases produced by different resistance phenotypes

Species and resistance phenotype No. of strains pI ctx hydro- lysisa Inhibitionb by the following:
Most similar β-lactamases
clox clav
K. pneumoniae
 Kpn1 8 5.6 Yes No Yes TEM-10 or -26
7.6 No No Yes SHV-1
 Kpn2 28 5.4 No No Yes TEM-1
7.6 Yes No Yes SHV-2 or -8
8.2 Yes No Yes SHV-5
 Kpn3 1 5.4 No No Yes TEM-1
8.0 Yes Yes No AmpC
E. coli
 Ec1 3 5.4 No No Yes TEM-1
5.6 Yes No Yes TEM-10 or -26
 Ec2 1 5.4 No No Yes TEM-1
7.6 Yes No Yes SHV-2 or -8
P. mirabilis 4 5.6 Yes No Yes TEM-10 or -26
a

Hydrolysis of 0.75 μg of cefotaxime (ctx) per ml; cefotaxime was used in the substrate-based isoelectric focusing overlay technique (12). 

b

The inhibitors used in the isoelectric focusing overlay technique were clavulanic acid (clav) and cloxacillin (clox) (13). 

Hydrolysis assays with nitrocefin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam were performed with strains possessing single β-lactamases. All the strains assayed hydrolyzed cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam to some extent (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Hydrolysis profiles of cell extracts containing a single β-lactamase

Strain β-Lac- tamase pI Hydrolysis (nmol of substratea hydrolyzed/min/mg of protein)
Nitrocefin Cefotaxime Ceftazidime Aztreonam
K. pneumoniae
 Pit 16 5.6 114 4 3 0.6
 Pit 100 7.6 159 11 0.1 0.9
 Pit 82 8.2 136 11 0.2 0.9
E. coli
 Pit 64 5.6 275 1 2 0.4
 Pit 56 7.6 143 9 0.1 0.8
P. mirabilis Pit 85 5.6 138 5 1 0.5
a

A 100 μM solution of substrate was used. 

DNA amplification and sequencing.

The DNAs from organisms producing single β-lactamases were amplified and sequenced. Strains producing ESBLs with pIs of 5.6, which aligned with TEM-10 and TEM-26, were amplified with the TEM primers (Table 4). The amino acids at positions 104, 164, and 240 (numbering of Ambler et al. [1]) were used to determine that this enzyme was more similar to TEM-26 (32). Amino acids deduced from amplicon sequences included lysine at position 104, serine at position 164, and glutamine at position 240 (Table 4). Strains producing ESBLs with pI values of 7.6 and 8.2, which aligned with SHV-2 and SHV-5, respectively, were amplified with SHV primers (Table 4). The amino acids at positions 205, 238, and 240 (numbering of Barthélémy et al. [2]) were used to identify the ESBL involved. The arginine at position 205, the serine at position 238, and the glutamic acid at position 240 of the deduced amino acid sequence of strains producing an ESBL with a pI of 7.6 indicated the presence of SHV-2 (13) (Table 4). K. pneumoniae Pit 82, producing an ESBL with a pI of 8.2, had a lysine at position 240, indicating the presence of SHV-5 (7) (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

Identification of extended-spectrum β-lactamases occurring in South Africa

Straina pI Amplification with the following:
Amino acid at the indicated position
β-Lactamase
TEMb
SHVc
TEM primers SHV primers 104 164 240 205 238 240
K. pneumoniae
 Pit 16 5.6 Yes No Lys Ser Glu TEM-26 type
 Pit 100 7.6 No Yes Arg Ser Glu SHV-2
 Pit 82 8.2 No Yes Arg Ser Lys SHV-5
E. coli
 Pit 64 5.6 Yes No Lys Ser Glu TEM-26 type
 Pit 56 7.6 No Yes Arg Ser Glu SHV-2
P. mirabilis Pit 85 5.6 Yes No Lys Ser Glu TEM-26 type
a

Strains with single β-lactamases were used for sequencing. 

b

Numbering according to Sutcliffe (34). 

c

Numbering according to Mercier and Levesque (19). 

DISCUSSION

Although members of the family Enterobacteriaceae producing ESBLs have been recovered from medical centers in South Africa since the late 1980s, little is known about the various types present or their prevalence (10). ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae strains have been involved in nosocomial outbreaks in intensive care units at several academic centers, leading to the temporary closure of one of the units. Furthermore, in Durban, a strain of K. pneumoniae producing an ESBL has been responsible for the failure of therapy with an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin (16).

This is the first report to identify definitively the different types of ESBLs produced by members of the family Enterobacteriaceae isolated from major medical centers in South Africa. The following ESBLs, produced by K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and P. mirabilis, were identified: a TEM-26-type β-lactamase, SHV-2, SHV-5, and an AmpC β-lactamase with a pI of 8.0. This represents the major types of β-lactamases found worldwide. K. pneumoniae and E. coli producing TEM-26 were first isolated from cancer patients in a children’s hospital in Stanford, Calif. (22), and have subsequently been described in England (12) and France (33). This is the first report of K. pneumoniae and E. coli producing a TEM-26-type β-lactamase outside the United States, Europe, and the United Kingdom. Members of the family Enterobacteriaceae producing SHV-2 and SHV-5 have been described worldwide (30), and South Africa has now been added to the list of countries where these enzymes are present.

The occurrence of an AmpC β-lactamase encoded on a plasmid recovered from strains of K. pneumoniae resistant to cefoxitin, as well as the expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, was first reported from Providence, R.I. (25). These strains were involved in a nosocomial outbreak, and imipenem was the only β-lactam antibiotic active against the strains involved. Since that initial report, E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains producing plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases have been isolated worldwide (35). These Bush group 1 β-lactamases appear to originate from chromosomal genes of Enterobacter, Citrobacter freundii, and P. aeruginosa (5). This report of a South African strain adds another isolate of K. pneumoniae which appears to produce this type of β-lactamase. The DNA responsible for encoding this enzyme needs to be cloned and sequenced to determine if this is a new type of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase.

β-Lactamases with extended-spectrum activities were first isolated from P. mirabilis in 1991 (36). This enzyme, FPM-1, was very similar to the chromosomal cephalosporinase of Proteus vulgaris. Subsequently, P. mirabilis strains producing TEM-3 have been isolated in France (17), and P. mirabilis producing TEM-10 have been isolated in the United States (24). This is the first report describing clinical isolates of P. mirabilis that produce TEM-26.

The variety of β-lactamases present in South Africa is disconcerting and probably reflects the overuse of the newer expanded-spectrum cephalosporins by the medical community at large. Although this investigation did not address the issue of prevalence, there is not doubt that the widespread dissemination of organisms producing ESBLs and plasmid-mediated AmpC enzymes will severely limit the therapeutic options of physicians facing these organisms, because the carbapenems are the only β-lactam drugs uniformly active against organisms producing these β-lactamases. Organisms producing these enzymes pose a serious threat for the future treatment of infections at large, and if these problems are to be minimized, it is important that these newer antimicrobial agents be used sparingly and with discretion.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

DNA sequencing was supported in part by UNMC/Eppley Cancer Center grant P30CA36727.

We thank the following individuals for provision of some of the clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae: K. P. Klugman and L. Saunders, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital; A. Brink, Pretoria Academic Hospital; and Y. Coovadia, King Edward VIII Hospital.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ambler R P, Coulson A F W, Frere J M, Ghuysen J M, Joris B, Forsmann M, Levesque R C, Tiraby G, Waley S G. A standard numbering scheme for the class A β-lactamases. Biochem J. 1991;276:269–270. doi: 10.1042/bj2760269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barthélémy M, Peduzzi J, Labia R. Complete amino acid sequence of p453-plasmid-mediated PIT-2 β-lactamase (SHV-1) Biochem J. 1988;251:73–79. doi: 10.1042/bj2510073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bauernfeind A, Chong Y, Schweighart S. Extended broad-spectrum β-lactamase in Klebsiella pneumoniae including resistance to cephamycins. Infection. 1989;17:316–321. doi: 10.1007/BF01650718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bauernfeind A, Grimm H, Schweighart S. A new plasmidic cefotaximase in a clinical isolate of Escherichia coli. Infection. 1990;18:294–298. doi: 10.1007/BF01647010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bauernfeind A, Stemplinger I, Jungwirth R, Wilhelm R, Chang Y. Comparative characterization of the cephamycinase blaCMY-1 gene and its relationship with other β-lactamase genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1926–1930. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.8.1926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ben Hassen A, Fournier G, Kechrid A, Fendri C, Ben Redjeb S, Philippon A. Résistance enzymatique au céfotaxime chez cinquante-six souches de Klebsiella spp., Escherichia coli et Salmonella spp. dans un hopital tunisien (1984–1988) Pathol Biol. 1990;38:464–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Billot-Klein D, Gutmann L, Collatz E. Nucleotide sequence of the SHV-5 β-lactamase gene of Klebsiella pneumoniae plasmid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:2439–2441. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.12.2439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bush K, Jacoby G A, Medeiros A A. A functional classification scheme for β-lactamases and its correlation with molecular structure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1211–1233. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.6.1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coovadia Y M, Johnson A P, Bhana B H, Hutchinson C R, George R C, Haferjee I E. Multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a neonatal nursery: the importance of maintenance of infection control policies and procedures in prevention of outbreaks. J Hosp Infect. 1992;22:197–205. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90044-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Derby P, Berens J. Letter. South Afr Med J. 1997;87:80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.DuBois S K, Marriott M S, Amyes S G B. TEM- and SHV-derived extended-spectrum β-lactamases: relationship between selection, structure and function. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995;35:7–22. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hibbert-Rodgers L C, Heritage J, Todd N, Hawkey P M. Convergent evolution of TEM-26, a β-lactamase with extended-spectrum activity. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;33:707–720. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.4.707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huletsky A, Coutre F, Levesque R C. Nucleotide sequence and phylogeny of SHV-2 β-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:1725–1732. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.9.1725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jacoby G A, Medeiros A A. More extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:1697–1704. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.9.1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jarlier V, Nicolas M-H, Fournier G, Philippon A. Extended broad-spectrum β-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer β-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev Infect Dis. 1988;10:867–878. doi: 10.1093/clinids/10.4.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Karas J A, Pillay D G, Muckart D, Sturm A W. Letter. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;37:203–204. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.1.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mariotte S, Nordmann P, Nicolas M H. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase in Proteus mirabilis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;33:925–935. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.5.925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Matthew M A, Harris A M, Marshall M J, Ross G W. The use of analytical isoelectric focusing for detection and identification of β-lactamases. J Gen Microbiol. 1975;88:169–178. doi: 10.1099/00221287-88-1-169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mercier J, Levesque R C. Cloning of SHV-2, OHIO-1, and OXA-6 β-lactamases and cloning and sequencing of SHV-1 β-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:1577–1583. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.8.1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility for bacteria that grow aerobically, M7-T2. 4th ed. Villanova, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, M2-T4. 4th ed. Villanova, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Naumovski L, Quinn J P, Miyashiro D, Patel M, Bush K, Singer S B, Graves D, Palzkill T, Arvin A M. Outbreak of ceftazidime resistance due to extended-spectrum β-lactamases in isolates from cancer patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:1991–1996. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.9.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.O’Callaghan C H, Muggleton P W, Kirby S M, Ryan D M. Inhibition of β-lactamase decomposition of cephaloridine and cephalothin by other cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1967;11:337–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Palzkill T, Thomson K S, Sanders C C, Moland E S, Huang W, Milligan T W. New variant of TEM-10 β-lactamase gene produced by a clinical isolate of Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1199–1200. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.5.1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Papanicolaou G A, Medeiros A A, Jacoby G A. Novel plasmid-mediated β-lactamase (MIR-1) conferring resistance to oxyimino- and α-methoxy β-lactams in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:2200–2209. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.11.2200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Payne D J, Woodford N, Amyes S G. Characterization of the plasmid mediated beta-lactamase BIL-1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992;30:119–127. doi: 10.1093/jac/30.2.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Philippon A, Labia R, Jacoby G A. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:1131–1136. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.8.1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pitout J D D, Moland E S, Sanders C C, Thomson K S, Fitzsimmons S R. β-Lactamases and detection of β-lactam resistance in Enterobacter spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:35–39. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Richard C, Philippon A, M’Boup S, Vieu J F. Epidemiologie des infections pediatriques a Klebsiella dans deux hopitaux de Dakar. Production de β-lactamases a spectre elargi (1987–1988) Med Mal Infect. 1989;19:753–759. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sanders C C, Sanders W E., Jr β-Lactam resistance in gram-negative bacteria: global trends and clinical impact. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:824–839. doi: 10.1093/clind/15.5.824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sanders C C, Sanders W E, Jr, Moland E S. Characterization of β-lactamases in situ on polyacrylamide gels. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986;30:951–952. doi: 10.1128/aac.30.6.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sirot, D. 1995. Extended-spectrum plasmid-mediated β-lactamases. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 36(Suppl. A):19–34. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 33.Soilleux M J, Morand A M, Arlet G J, Scavizzi M R, Labia R. Survey of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases: prevalence of TEM-3 and first identification of TEM-26 in France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1027–1029. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.4.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sutcliffe J G. Nucleotide sequence of the ampicillin resistance gene of Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978;75:3737–3741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.8.3737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thomson K S, Prevan A M, Sanders C C. Novel plasmid-mediated β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae: emerging problems for new β-lactam antibiotics. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis. 1996;16:151–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Watanabe Y, Yokota T, Higashi Y, Wakai Y, Mine Y. In-vitro and in-vivo transferable β-lactam resistance due to new plasmid-mediated oxyiminocephalosporinase from a clinical isolate of Proteus mirabilis. Microbiol Immunol. 1991;35:87–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1991.tb01537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES