Abstract
Recent evidence demonstrates potential links between mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). In addition, bidirectional interactions between the intestinal microbiota and host mitochondria may modulate intestinal inflammation. We observed previously that mice deficient in the mitochondrial protein MCJ (Methylation-controlled J protein) exhibit increased susceptibility to DSS colitis. However, it is unclear whether this phenotype is primarily driven by MCJ−/− associated gut microbiota dysbiosis or by direct effects of MCJ-deficiency. Here, we demonstrate that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from MCJ-deficient into germ-free mice was sufficient to confer increased susceptibility to colitis. Therefore, an FMT experiment by cohousing was designed to alter MCJ-deficient microbiota. The phenotype resulting from complex I deficiency was reverted by FMT. In addition, we determined the protein expression pathways impacted by MCJ deficiency, providing insight into the pathophysiology of IBD. Further, we used magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize taxa-specific coating of the intestinal microbiota with Immunoglobulin A (IgA-SEQ) in MCJ-deficient mice. We show that high IgA coating of fecal bacteria observed in MCJ-deficient mice play a potential role in disease progression. This study allowed us to identify potential microbial signatures in feces associated with complex I deficiency and disease progression. This research highlights the importance of finding microbial biomarkers, which might serve as predictors, permitting the stratification of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients into distinct clinical entities of the UC spectrum.
Subject terms: Clinical microbiology, Microbiota
Introduction
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are a group of chronic inflammatory disorders that affect the small and large intestines. Ulcerative colitis (UC) is one of the two primary forms of IBD in humans. Although the core etiology of IBD is unknown, altered gut microbiota composition, sometimes referred to as dysbiosis, is a common feature of IBD pathogenesis. Dysbiotic microbiota may influence the disease course through its effects on intestinal immunity1. There is growing evidence that specific members of the intestinal microbiota may predispose individuals to disease, although the identification of disease-driving bacteria is still a major challenge2.
Recent evidence has revealed a bidirectional interaction between microbiota and mitochondria, emerging as a significant area of research in health and disease3,4. In a recent study conducted with a cohort of 408 UC patients, active UC correlated with mitochondrial dysfunction4. Importantly, they detected 13 genes associated with reduced ATP production and reduced complex I activity. In previous studies, we observed a profound impact of Methylation-controlled J protein (MCJ, encoded by Dnajc15) deficiency on microbial composition during the development and progression of colitis5. MCJ is a mitochondrial protein that negatively regulates complex I of the electron transport chain, controlling ATP production without affecting proton leakage and reactive oxygen species production6. We have reported that MCJ provides protection against acute colitis and its deficiency affects mitochondrial morphology, gut microbiota composition, and bile acid composition contributing to disease severity5. An imbalance of the secondary bile acid pool was also observed in IBD patients with gut dysbiosis7. In addition, MCJ deficiency was associated with the enrichment of potential disease-driving bacteria. Our data suggests that gut microbial composition in the colon is affected by MCJ and may impact UC development and progression.
Secretory Immunoglobulin A (IgA) plays a central role in the maintenance of a ‘healthy’ intestinal microbiota and serves as first line of defense of the mucosal surface against enteric toxins and pathogen invasion8,9. IgA recognizes a particular subset of microorganisms, either pathogens or commensals, blocking their attachment to epithelial cells and minimizing bacterial translocation through immune exclusion. Palm et al. (2014) reported that high IgA coating, as assessed by a technology called IgA-SEQ, can identify potentially colitogenic bacteria from both murine and human intestinal microbiota10. Thus, IgA-SEQ might be a potential tool to identify specific members that are associated with enhanced inflammation in mice with perturbed mitochondrial function.
Here, we characterized the effect of complex I mitochondrial dysfunction on gut microbiota composition and susceptibility to colitis, using MCJ-deficient mice. Our aim was to shed light on the role of microbiota-host mitochondria axis in UC and to identify gut microbial signatures linked to perturbed electron transport chain function. For this purpose, we performed three different approaches based on germ-free (GF) microbial colonization, fecal microbial transplant (FMT) and finally IgA-SEQ technology.
Results
MCJ-deficient mice microbial composition increased inflammatory profile in colonized germ-free (GF) mice
To investigate the colitogenic potential of MCJ-deficient mice gut microbial composition, germ-free mice were colonized with WT and MCJ-deficient mouse microbiota. After microbial colonization, no differences in weight were noted. Germ-free mice colonized with MCJ-deficient microbiota were significantly more susceptible to DSS colitis, as measured by DAI (Disease Activity Index) and weight loss, compared to mice colonized with WT microbiota (Fig. 1a, b). Remarkably, stool consistency and occult blood were also aggravated in this group of mice (Supplementary Fig. 1a). At day 8, a marked reduction of colonic length (P value = 0.018, Mann-Whitney) was observed in GF mice colonized with MCJ-deficient mouse microbiota (Fig. 1c). The antimicrobial peptide Lcn2, a biomarker of intestinal inflammation (Fig. 1d), and the potent inflammatory cytokine Il1b (Fig. 1e) were also upregulated in colonic tissues from MCJ-deficient microbiota colonized mice, contrary to the antimicrobial peptide Reg3b, which was downregulated (Fig. 1f). However, no differences were detected in the expression of Tnf, Tnfr1 and Myd88 (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Overall, these data suggest that the dysbiotic microbiota from MCJ-deficient mice exacerbated colitis independent of the direct effects of MCJ-deficiency on the host immune system.
Next, we sought to identify specific groups of bacteria related to UC pathogenesis and altered mitochondrial function that may serve as potential biomarkers of disease progression. Therefore, we sequenced the V4 region of the 16 S rDNA gene from fecal content at day 0 (2 weeks after colonization, just before DSS treatment) and at day 8 (two days after DSS treatment stopped). We obtained a mean of 12800 ± 2962 reads per sample and the mean Good´s coverage percentage was 100%. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity displayed differences in homeostasis (day 0) between colonized microbial communities based on MCJ contribution (adjusted P = 0.006, ANOSIM) (Fig. 1g). DSS treatment and MCJ-deficiency at day 8 were also associated with distinct microbial compositions (adjusted P = 0.042, ANOSIM). As reported, alpha diversity indices decreased after DSS administration in both communities (Fig. 1h). Strikingly, bacteria from the Actinobacteria phylum exhibited increased relative abundance in MCJ-deficient microbiota at day 0 compared to WT (P value ≤ 0.0001, two-way ANOVA) (8.81% vs 1%) (Fig. 1i). In the DSS treated groups, the relative abundance of the Actinobacteria (P value = 0.0044, two-way ANOVA), Bacteroidetes (P value = 0.0257, two-way ANOVA) and Verrucomicrobia (P value = 0.0075, two-way ANOVA) phyla was significantly higher while Firmicutes (P value = 0.0025, two-way ANOVA) were lower, in GF mice colonized with MCJ-deficient microbial community compared to WT. In this regard, the dysbiosis index (Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio) was significantly lower in GF mice colonized with MCJ-deficient mice microbiota compared to those colonized with WT gut microbes (Fig. 1j) as usually observed in IBD. Moreover, DESeq2 identified the OTUs that were differentially abundant at day 0 and day 8 in colon content. Two weeks after colonization and just prior to DSS administration (day 0), Bifidobacterium and Coprobacillus were increased while Staphylococcus, Bacteroides and Parabacteroides decreased in GF mice colonized with MCJ-deficient mouse microbiota (Fig. 1k). Two days after DSS treatment (day 8), MCJ-deficient microbial community showed elevated levels of Bifidobacterium but Butyricicoccus, Akkermansia, Ruminococcus and Prevotella were also augmented (Fig. 1l). Notably, measured Ruminococcus and Prevotella changes were confirmed with linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSE) (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Conversely, Clostridium, Coprococcus and Odoribacter were lower in GF mice colonized with MCJ-deficient microbiota as compared to mice colonized with WT microbiota.
In conclusion, these results suggest that complex I deficiency affected gut microbial environment, which contributes to the development of the disease when transferred to germ-free mice with non-modified mitochondria.
Cohousing altered microbial composition and reduced disease severity from MCJ-deficient mice
To further determine the potential feasibility of microbial manipulation to treat DSS induced damage (aggravated by complex I dysfunction), we cohoused WT and MCJ-deficient mice for 4 weeks (Fig. 2a). First, the disease activity index and histological score parameters were evaluated. MCJ-deficient mice treated with DSS (MCJ-KO DSSp) presented the highest DAI scores at day 8 and 9 (Fig. 2b). However, DAI from MCJ-deficient mice cohoused with WT mice and treated with DSS (MCJ-KO cohoused DSSp) exhibited a significant reduction (P value < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). Differences between WT groups were not observed. The histological analysis showed the same tendency, with cohoused and DSS-treated MCJ-deficient mice (MCJ-KO cohoused DSSp) presenting significantly lower histological scores compared to the WT group (P value = 0.0269, two-way ANOVA) (Fig. 2c). Moreover, a significant reduction in the histological score was observed exclusively in MCJ-deficient mice treated with DSS following cohousing (Cop) when compared to MCJ-deficient mice housed alone (Ap) (P value < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA). Colon length, goblet cells and ROS production were not affected by cohousing (Supplementary Fig. 2a–c). These results indicated that microbes acquired from the WT microbiota during cohousing ameliorate DSS colitis (and dysbiosis) in MCJ-deficient animals.
To determine microbial shifts on WT and MCJ-deficient mice after cohousing and DSS-induced colitis, the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene from colonic bacterial communities was sequenced. This process generated a mean of 97775 ± 16765 counts per sample and the mean Good´s coverage percentage was 99%. Alpha diversity, determined by the number of observed OTUs, Chao1 and Shannon indexes did not reveal differences between genotypes housed alone (Ap) or together (cohoused, Cop) during intestinal inflammation (Fig. 2d). Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) ordination plot based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity detected differences between experimental groups (Fig. 2e). NMDS showed a clear cluster between homeostasis (DSSn, An) and DSS-induced colitis groups (DSSp, Ap). Although ANOSIM did not reveal statistical differences between genotypes (WT and MCJ-KO) treated with DSS housed alone or together, WT mice showed statistically different clustering between housed alone and cohoused conditions (P value = 0.001, ANOSIM). After one month of cohousing, the data confirmed the reciprocal transmission of gut microbes between both cohoused genotypes impacting significantly in the microbial composition of the WT cohoused group.
Taxonomic differences at phylum level revealed a significant enrichment (P value = 0.022, two-way ANOVA) of the phylum Verrucomicrobia in the MCJ-deficient mice housed alone (KO_Ap) compared to WT upon intestinal inflammation. Of note, after cohousing, Verrucomicrobia abundance was significantly increased in WT mice compared to DSS-treated and housed alone WT mice (P value = 0.017, two-way ANOVA) (Fig. 2f). Furthermore, the analysis of the top 10 most abundant genera showed substantial shifts between genotypes when the mice were cohoused (Fig. 2g). Potential transmission of Lactobacillus and Turicibacter genera from WT to MCJ-deficient mice was observed. Subsequently, differential abundance analysis using DESeq2 was performed to test differences in microbial composition between the WT and MCJ-deficient groups housed alone and cohoused. The Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus, and Adlercreutzia genera showed higher abundances in the MCJ-deficient cohoused group (KO_Cop) compared to the group housed alone (KO_Ap), indicating that these taxa could have been acquired because of fecal transmission (Fig. 2h). Additionally, Lactobacillus displayed a significant enrichment (adjusted P < 0.05, DESeq2) in MCJ-KO cohoused mice compared to WT cohoused mice (Fig. 2h). However, the relative abundance of Prevotella and Oscillospira decreased after cohousing in the MCJ-deficient group (Fig. 2h and Supplementary Fig. 3a). The Oscillospira genus augmented in MCJ deficient-mouse microbiota both under healthy and inflammatory conditions (KO_An and KO_Ap) (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). After cohousing, WT mice (WT_Cop) showed an enriched abundance of the Oscillospira genus compared to WT mice housed alone (WT_Ap) and cohoused MCJ-deficient mice (KO_Cop) (Fig. 2i and Supplementary Fig. 3c). Furthermore, taxa from the Pasteurellaceae and Enterobacteriaceae families were reduced in cohoused mice due to MCJ deficiency (KO_Cop) compared to MCJ-deficient mice housed alone (KO_Ap) (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Pearson´s correlation analysis revealed significant positive associations (P value < 0.05) between specific bacterial OTUs abundance and disease severity (DAI), including Akkermansia muciniphila (r = 0.63), Parabacteroides distasonis (r = 0.66), Bacteroides acidifaciens (r = 0.63), Turicibacter (r = 0.49), Enterobacteriacea (r = 0.45) and Prevotella (r = 0.44). On the other hand, the DAI correlated negatively with the S24.7 family (r = −0.64), Lactobacillus (r = −0.63), Adlercreutzia (r = −0.63) and Bifidobacterium (r = −0.60) among others. In order to identify whether the treatment with the probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus reuteri, could be effective as an amelioration treatment, we supplemented MCJ-deficient mice with the bacterium and determined pathology upon DSS-induction. Our results showed that the administration of this species (KO Lr + ) did not result in disease improvement in MCJ deficient mice as showed DAI score, weight loss percentage and colonic length (Supplementary Fig. 2e, f).
Collectively, our data show significant microbial shifts after cohousing MCJ deficient and WT mice for one month prior to disease induction. These data also suggest that the effect of these changes on the pathology may be dependent on multiple species that are either elevated or reduced in cohoused MCJ-deficient mice.
MCJ-deficient mouse microbiota influences immune cell infiltration and regulates the inflammatory response
Immune cell infiltration was tested by measuring monocytes, neutrophils myeloperoxidase secretion, and quantifying macrophages and dendritic cells as part of the UC histological features. As expected, MPO levels increased with DSS treatment. Of note, the significant differences (P value < 0.05, two-way ANOVA) observed between WT and MCJ KO DSS treated groups, disappeared after 4 weeks of cohousing (Fig. 3a). Infiltration of macrophages in the colon tissue was higher in DSS-treated mice although no differences were observed between genotypes in cohoused and alone groups (Fig. 3b). The percentage of dendritic cells in mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) decreased upon intestinal inflammation, suggesting the mobilization of these cells to the lamina propria (Fig. 3c). Furthermore, the high percentage of dendritic cells observed in MCJ-deficient mice treated with DSS compared to the WT genotype was not found in cohoused groups. These results indicate that dysbiosis in MCJ-deficient mice may modulate immune cell infiltration with potential implications in intestinal inflammation exacerbation.
Next, we studied colonic gene expression to examine whether specific microbial compositions affect the inflammatory output. Tnf expression was increased in MCJ-deficient mice treated with DSS compared to DSS-treated, WT mice. However, this difference was reduced after cohousing, suggesting that the MCJ-deficient microbial community is linked to TNF production and can be modified after one month of cohousing (Fig. 3d). Expression of TNF receptor 1 Tnfr1, the proinflammatory cytokine Il1β and the adaptor protein Myd88 were also increased during experimental colitis in MCJ-deficient mice. However, this effect was eliminated in cohoused mice (Fig. 3e–g). Furthermore, the same effect was observed with the antimicrobial peptide Reg3b (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Overall, these results suggest that the transmission of microorganisms from WT to MCJ-deficient mice ameliorates intestinal inflammation.
Interaction between bacterial community and colonic protein levels during cohousing
To delve into the impact that microbiota composition may have in the gut, we conducted a comprehensive proteomic analysis of the mouse colonic tissue. We identified and quantified a total of 4695 proteins. 153 proteins were differentially (P value < 0.05; Student´s t-test) expressed between WT and MCJ-deficient mice at steady state (no DSS treatment), 140 between separately housed DSS-treated groups, and 158 between cohoused DSS-treated groups. Functional annotation enrichment analysis revealed several pathways that were significantly different between WT and MCJ-deficient mice (Fig. 4a). In homeostasis, proteins related to molecular function (MF) gene ontology (GO) pathways such as cofactor, nucleoside and actin-binding, and coupled ATPase activity were upregulated in the absence of MCJ. Notably, some proteins associated with MF pathways were enriched in MCJ-deficient mice compared to WT mice only when mice were cohoused, such as ATPase, helicase and enzyme activator activity, which demonstrates the potential of the microbiota to regulate the colonic proteome. Strikingly, separately housed and cohoused MCJ-deficient DSS-treated mice exhibited significant (adjusted P < 0.05) shifts in their proteomes including ATPase activity, cell adhesion molecular binding and enzyme activator activity. Microbiota transmission during cohousing also eliminated some differences between separately housed versus cohoused MCJ-deficient mice, such as proteins involved in cell adhesion (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, acquisition of the WT microbiota by MCJ-deficient mice during cohousing affected numerous metabolic processes and the establishment of cell polarity (Supplementary Fig. 4a). To decipher the biological complexity of colon proteomes, we assembled a protein interaction network of the upregulated proteins and pathways linked to MF GO in the cohoused DSS-treated MCJ-deficient mice compared to cohoused WT mice (Fig. 4b). Remarkably, numerous proteins related to ATPase activity and helicase activity were connected. In the protein network that shows the significantly enriched proteins within the GO molecular function in MCJ-deficient DSS-treated mice housed alone compared to cohoused mice, we found multiple interactions between proteins with enzyme activator activity, actin-binding and cell adhesion molecule binding (Fig. 4c). As expected, we also observed increased oxidative phosphorylation in the absence of MCJ, both in healthy and DSS-treated housed alone conditions (Supplementary Fig. 4b). In addition, proteins associated with Cellular Component and KEGG pathways suggested increased mitochondrial respiration (mitochondrial inner membrane, mitochondrial matrix and oxidoreductase complex) and metabolic pathways (carbon, pyruvate and propanoate metabolism, TCA cycle) in MCJ deficient mice compared to WT mice in the absence of DSS (Supplementary Fig. 4b, c). Lastly, in MCJ-deficient mice, cohousing augmented microtubule plus-end binding compared to cohoused WT mice, an essential activity for cell motility, mitosis and intracellular transport (Supplementary Fig. 4b).
We performed Spearman correlation analyses to identify associations between proteins significantly different (adjusted P < 0.05) between WT and MCJ deficient colitis colon tissue with specific microbial OTUs (Fig. 5). Interestingly, A. muciniphila, which was augmented in the MCJ-deficient mice, was strongly associated with AP1M2 protein (adjusted P = 0.04), a master regulator of intestinal epithelial cell polarization that is required for maintenance of immune homeostasis. Furthermore, A. muciniphila was associated with increased mitochondrial protein translation by tRNA synthetase RARS2 protein (adjusted P = 0.04), and is also linked to the appropriate degradation of damaged proteins and cells by PSMC6 and RIP3K proteins. A. muciniphila was also related to C3 (adjusted P = 0.04), a central component of the complement cascade and part of the innate immune system that plays a key role in defense against pathogens. The S24-7 family, which was generally increased in MCJ-deficient mice, also correlated positively with histone-related proteins, PSMC6, RIP3K and C3 proteins (adjusted P = 0.04). Select Lactobacillus OTUs also strongly correlated with histone-related proteins (adjusted P = 0.04), suggesting that some Lactobacillus strains could be involved in the epigenetic reprogramming of immune cells, for example in the process of innate immune memory acquisition. On the contrary, the Bacteroides genus and commensal B. acidifaciens showed a negative correlation with histone-related proteins (adjusted P = 0.04). Collectively, our data indicate that microbiota-host interactions are critical for the development and function of the host immune system in UC.
In summary, transmission of microbiota between distinct genotypes underscores the reciprocal interactions between microbiota and host intestinal tissues, which regulate diverse host functions and responses.
IgA-SEQ identifies potentially drivers of ulcerative colitis within MCJ-deficiency
Previous work in either DSS-induced experimental mice or IBD patients suggested that disease-driving bacteria are highly coated with IgA10. Therefore, we sought to determine whether bacterial IgA coating would identify a potential microbial signature associated with complex I deficiency and increased susceptibility to IBD development. We used magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) and 16S sequencing to characterize taxa-specific coating of the intestinal microbiota with immunoglobulin A (IgA-SEQ). We achieved good taxonomic resolution with a mean read count of 37.502 ± 8.773 sequences per sample and a Good´s coverage percentage of 100%. First, we studied alpha diversity indexes of IgA-coated bacteria including Observed species, Chao1 and Shannon (Fig. 6a). IgA-coated intestinal bacteria from MCJ-deficient mice after DSS treatment exhibited the lowest diversity indexes as compared to IgA-coated bacteria in DSS-treated WT mice (P value = 0.055, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) within Observed species and Chao1 indexes. Notably, IgA-coated bacteria in MCJ-deficient mice upon DSS treatment displayed significantly reduced gut microbial diversity compared to those of healthy MCJ-deficient mice (P value = 0.019, two-way ANOVA). Proteobacteria were numerically the major phylum coated with IgA in all experimental groups (Fig. 6b). Nonetheless, after induction of colitis, MCJ-deficient IgA-coated taxa displayed significantly higher abundance of this phylum compared to the WT group (P value = 0.0458, two-way ANOVA). In homeostatic conditions, IgA coating of Actinobacteria was significantly decreased in MCJ-deficient mice compared to WT mice (P value = 0.0352, two-way ANOVA).
High IgA-coating identifies colitogenic bacteria and is associated with increased susceptibility to colitis. Therefore, we compared IgA-coating levels between taxa based on the IgA coating index score (ICI) for each taxon (relative abundance (IgA+)/relative abundance (IgA−)) [10]. In homeostasis, WT mice showed higher levels of IgA-coating and significantly increased relative abundance of Bifidobacterium adolescentis (P value = 0.0194, two-way ANOVA) (Fig. 6c). On the contrary, the segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) Candidatus Arthromitus, Elizabethkingia and Ochromobactrum were highly coated in the MCJ-deficient mice whereas they had similar relative abundance in both genotypes, except C. Arthromitus that presented higher abundance in WT mice (P value < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA) (Fig. 6d). During intestinal inflammation, members of the Pasteurellaceae (ICI 18.47 vs 0: P value = 0.05, two-way ANOVA) and Veillonellaceae (ICI 2.51 vs 0; P value = 0.05, two-way ANOVA) families and the genus Achromobacter (ICI 6.36 vs 0; P value < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA) were more abundant and coated with IgA in MCJ-deficient mice microbiota.
Next, we used DESeq2 to identify statistically different OTUs abundance within IgA-coated bacteria between genotypes. Prior to DSS-induced colitis, OTUs belonging to the genera Faecalibacterium (adjusted P = 0.018) and Streptococcus (adjusted P < 0.0001) were enriched in MCJ-deficient mice compared to WT, which instead exhibited increased abundance of Bifidobacterium (adjusted P = 0.029), Acidaminococcus (adjusted P = 0.013) and Candidatus Arthromitus (adjusted P = 0.029) (Fig. 6d). After DSS administration, genera linked to colitogenic members such as Achromobacter (adjusted P < 0.0001), Prevotella (adjusted P < 0.0001), Staphylococcus (adjusted P = 0.049) and Veillonella (adjusted P = 0.015) were augmented in the MCJ-deficient mice, although the putatively beneficial genera Lactobacillus (adjusted P < 0.0001) and Lactococcus (adjusted P = 0.0008) were also increased in this group (Fig. 6e). Conversely, members of Alistipes (adjusted P = 0.018), Corynebacterium (adjusted P = 0.018), Clostridium (adjusted P = 0.001) and Sutterella (adjusted P = 0.018) were decreased in MCJ-deficient mice after DSS.
In summary, specific taxa were found to be of higher abundance and IgA-coating in MCJ-deficient mice community and suggest that IgA-SEQ highlights a potential microbial signature linked to complex I deficiency.
Discussion
Bidirectional mitochondria-microbiota interactions appear to be critical in numerous diseases including obesity, diabetes, intestinal inflammation and cancer11,12. We found that the colitis-prone phenotype of MCJ deficient mice was transferable to germ-free mice after microbiota transplantation. Then, mice with altered mitochondrial function improved after cohousing with WT mice, suggesting the acquisition of protective microbial taxa by MCJ-deficient mice during cohousing. Finally, we sought to identify highly IgA-coated bacteria that might contribute to intestinal disease in a mouse model of complex I mitochondrial dysfunction. Notably, microbiome alterations also had dramatic impacts on the host colonic proteome of individuals with altered mitochondria function.
Although most previously described colitogenic bacteria do not induce overt pathology in wild-type mice, they can trigger pathogenic inflammatory responses in genetically or environmentally predisposed animals10. This is consistent with our finding that Ruminococcus and Prevotella are enriched in GF mice colonized with MCJ-deficient microbiota after DSS induction. Strikingly, R. gnavus was previously found to be enriched in IBD patients with increased disease activity, and high abundance of this bacterium has been associated with lack of response to anti-TNF treatment13,14. Prevotellaceae species were reported to exacerbate DSS-induced colitis15–17 and to be highly IgA coated in dysbiotic mice10. In agreement, Prevotella correlated positively with the DAI in our microbial transplantation experiment. The reduced Oscillospira and Prevotella abundance detected in MCJ-deficient mice after cohousing, suggested that decreased levels of specific microorganisms might be linked to a better prognosis. Low IgA coating of Oscillospira has been recently associated with earlier resection and has been considered a potential pathobiont that may exacerbate disease in the absence of a potent IgA response18. In agreement with our results, gnotobiotic mice colonized with a community of organisms isolated from IBD patients that included Oscillospira were more susceptible to DSS colitis10. Furthermore, the high levels of Il1b, Tnfr1 and Myd88 expression detected in MCJ-deficient mice housed alone significantly decreased in cohoused MCJ-deficient mice after colitis induction, indicating that specific members of MCJ-deficient microbiota might be responsible for inducing increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Based on this data, we confirmed a potential connection between mitochondrial function and microbiota composition by showing that MCJ-deficient mice exhibit a distinct microbial signature opening new venues for the prediction of disease outcome.
After cohousing with WT mice, we found that MCJ-deficient mice acquired many OTUs belonging to the Lactobacillus genus. Probiotics, including Lactobacillus have been suggested to maintain and induce remission in UC patients, although the efficacy of probiotics in IBD is still inconclusive19. Nonetheless, the VSL#3 probiotic mixture (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Streptococcus) has been demonstrated to have beneficial effects by inducing remission in active UC patients (56.2% failed to achieve remission with VSL#3 versus 75.2% in patients receiving placebo)19,20. Furthermore, multiple OTUs belonging to the Lactobacillus genus correlated negatively with the disease activity index. Therefore, the augmented Lactobacillus taxa might explain the improvement seen in cohoused MCJ-deficient mice. However, the selected Lactobacillus species (L. reuteri) did not ameliorate colitis in MCJ-deficient mice suggesting that it might be a marker of disease evolution in this genotype, rather than responsible for the phenotype of mice with mitochondrial dysfunction. Other possibilities are that the phenotype observed could be the result of more complex microbiota changes and not the effect of single species or that the administration period was too sort prior to DSS induction. On the other hand, the positive correlation observed between A. muciniphila and the DAI, suggested that A. muciniphila might play a therapeutic role to ameliorate the elevated damage produced by DSS-induced colitis21. Even though WT mice acquired some members of the MCJ-deficient microbial community, including Oscillospira and R. gnavus, this did not affect the progression of colitis. In this case, the gut microbial ecosystem is complex and well-established, therefore the presence of dysfunctional mitochondria and the derived environment effect may be needed to develop severe disease, pointing to an essential bidirectional interaction between gut microbiota and mitochondria in mucosal, epithelial and immune cells. However, FMT in GF mice had a stronger effect due to the less effective immune responses and defects in metabolism22. Hence, due to the high heterogeneity observed in UC patients, assessment of mitochondrial function in patients has the potential to be an early indicator of the course of the disease, leading to early prognosis, and helping to choose the best therapy in order to obtain a better outcome.
Our understanding of functional disease pathophysiology can be increased by the identification of the proteomic changes in health and disease. These, in turn can have potential implications for improving and promoting personalized medicine. Interestingly, we found that animal cohousing was sufficient to alter the host proteome. Many proteomic pathways affected by cohousing were related to tight junction dynamics that link tissue repair to the innate immune response23–25. Collectively, our data suggest that specific members of the gut microbiota, might play an important role in modifying the proteome, including immune responses. These can be associated with complex I, or perhaps more broadly, with mitochondrial dysfunction. For example, the interaction between different Lactobacilli species and mitochondrial functions is well-known26–30. Overall, our results support the application of proteomics to human IBD to discover biomarkers to predict disease progression or therapeutic responsiveness.
Specific members of the human intestinal microbiota are potentially involved in the development of chronic inflammatory responses. The low diversity of IgA-coated taxa observed in MCJ-deficient mice during intestinal inflammation suggests that IgA coating could be linked to a high affinity, pathogen-specific and T-cell dependent response10. Remarkably, we identified Achromobacter genus and bacteria belonging to the Pasteurellaceae and Veillonellaceae families with higher abundance and higher IgA-coating in MCJ-deficient mice after colitis induction. While IgA responses can protect against bacterial driven intestinal inflammation, highly IgA coated bacteria drive inflammatory disease indicating that the host IgA responses to select intestinal bacteria may be insufficient to fully neutralize or clear potentially pathogenic species10. Furthermore, IgA coating can also sometimes facilitate bacterial colonization through antibody-enhanced biofilm formation18,31. In agreement with our results, a study using a large cohort of pediatric UC patients reported enrichment of the Enterobacteriaceae, Pasteurellaceae, Veillonellaceae, and Fusobacteriaceae families in patients with increased inflammation32. Furthermore, the Achromobacter and Elizabethkingia genera have been previously observed in UC patients with active disease33. Interestingly, in homeostasis, we found that Candidatus Arthromitus and the Elizabethkingia genus were highly coated in MCJ-deficient mice. Candidatus Arthromitus, also known as segmented filamentous bacterium (SFB), is a potent inducer of the IgA response and Th17 cells and have been suggested to drive intestinal inflammation in UC34–36. Of note, SFB appeared to be highly IgA-coated in both colitis-induced, and dysbiosis- and colitis-induced specific pathogen-free mice10. Collectively, we conclude that disturbed mitochondrial activity may critically impact microbial composition and host IgA responses, augmenting susceptibility to UC.
In conclusion, our study complements previous findings about the role of the microbiome in UC. Germ-free mice colonization demonstrates that the dysbiotic microbiota from MCJ-deficient mice can confer disease susceptibility. Mitochondrial dysfunction due to MCJ deficiency in UC is associated with increased Oscillospira and Prevotella, and decreased Lactobacillus abundance. However, we show that microbial transplant through cohousing with WT mice improves disease outcomes in MCJ-deficient mice. Therefore, the improvement observed in co-housing experiments in the MCJ-deficient animals is due to the presence of dominant, beneficial species in the gut microbial environment and strongly suggests that the phenotype normally observed in these mice is due to the absence of beneficial species rather than the prevalence of deleterious taxa. Finally, we identify Proteobacteria as the major phylum coated with IgA that are significantly increased in the MCJ deficient groups. Hence, our results show that the microbiota composition is a dominant determinant because the microbiota from MCJ-deficient mice can indeed provoke worse disease by itself (probably due to the invasiveness of MCJ deficient-primed species) even in the absence of the genotype responsible for the selection of this microbiota. Therefore, these results suggest that microbiota-targeted treatment may be a valuable option in patients with similar mitochondrial dysfunction states.
Methods
Animals and experimental design
MCJ-deficient and Wild-Type (WT) mice on a C57BL/6 background were used [6] under the approval of Diputación de Bizkaia (Competent Authority) upon favorable review from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at CIC bioGUNE (Spain; permit number CBBA-0615). Mice were maintained under specific pathogen free conditions, applying standard housing conditions (21–23 °C temperature and 12/12-hour light/dark cycles) and fed ad libitum on standard mouse chow (Global diet 2914, Harlam, Madison, USA).
For fecal IgA coating, WT and MCJ-deficient male mice (8–10 week-old mice) were treated with 3% dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) (36–50 kDa; TdB Labs) during 6 days followed by two days of recovery with sterile water. At the end of every experiment, mice were humanely euthanized through administration of CO2. Faeces were collected at sacrifice and stored at −80 °C until processing.
For the conventional cohousing experiment, WT and MCJ-deficient female mice between 3–5 weeks of age were mixed during 4 weeks prior to colitis induction. All mice were weaned in our animal facilities. Colitis was induced administering DSS in the drinking water (2%) for 7 days followed by a recovery period of three days with autoclaved water. Feces and tissues were collected at sacrifice and stored at −80 °C until use.
For germ-free mice colonization, GF wild-type C57BL/6 male mice were bred and maintained at Yale School of Medicine and all treatments were made in accordance with Yale Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. 4–6 week-old germ-free C57BL/6 mice were colonized via oral gavage with 200 µL of WT and MCJ-KO bacterial consortia (50–200 mg feces) from mice of the same sex and age. After 2-4 weeks, 2% of DSS was administered to mice during 6 days followed by two days of water. All gnotobiotic mice were maintained in Techniplast P Isocages and manipulated aseptically for the duration of the experiment. 16S rRNA gene of the V4 region was sequenced from mouse feces at days 0 (before DSS administration) and 8 (2 days after DSS administration) to confirm colonization and microbial composition.
In all experiments, a technician blindly evaluated the disease activity index (DAI) of every mouse on a daily basis. This index is a score based on animal body weight loss, the presence of blood in feces, and stool consistency. The criteria proposed by Camuesco et al., 2004 were used to assign scores37.
Administration of Lactobacillus reuteri to MCJ deficient mice during colitis induction
Colitis was induced in 8–10 week-old MCJ-deficient mice by adding 3% (w/v) DSS to the drinking water for 6 days. L. reuteri (1 × 109 CFU per dose) was administered daily from the beginning of the experimental period simultaneously with DSS treatment up to day 8. The Lactobacillus species was selected through the analysis of the 16S rRNA in our mouse model. L. reuteri was grown in Lactobacilli MRS broth for 20 h supplemented with 0.05% L-cysteine-hydrochloride at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions.
Determination of ROS in colon tissue sections
Samples were sectioned in a cryostat (8 μm) and incubated with 150 μM of MnTBAP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h at RT. The samples were then washed with PBS and incubated with 1 μM of dihydroethidium (DHE, Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at 37 °C. Sections were washed again and mounted with ProLong mounting media containing DAPI (Invitrogen). Photographs were taken with a fluorescence microscope (Axioimager.D1 Zeiss) and analyzed by ImageJ software.
Histology and immunohistochemistry
Colon tissue was fixed in 10% formalin fixative, dehydrated, embedded in paraffin and cut into 5 μm thick sections. For histopathology, sections were deparaffined, hydrated and stained with hematoxylin. Samples were analyzed by a pathologist blinded to mouse genotype and treatment. The histological score was based on edema, ulceration and infiltration of neutrophils and mononuclear cells in the different layers of the gastrointestinal wall: mucosal epithelium and lamina propia, crypts, submucosa and muscular layer.
For F4/80 immunohistochemistry analysis, tissue sections were deparaffined, hydrated and subjected to antigen retrieval using proteinase K for 15 min. Endogenous enzymes were first blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min and, blocked with goat serum. Sections were incubated with biotin rat anti-mouse F4/80 primary antibody for 2 h at 37 °C (Biolegend Cat#123105; Dilution 1:50), followed by 30 min incubation with ImmPRESS HRP goat anti-rat secondary antibody (Vector Cat#MP-7404-50, Dilution 1:500). Finally, slides were developed with 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine (DAB, Sigma-Aldrich) substrate and counterstained in Mayer’s hematoxylin for 30 seconds. Images were captured with a Zeiss Axioimager A1 microscope and analyzed using the Frida software.
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and gene expression
Colon samples were collected and frozen at −80 °C. The previous day of the RNA extraction, 1 ml of RNAlater solution was added to the samples and stored at −20 °C. Total RNA from colon tissue was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen) and Nucleospin RNA kit (Macherey-Nagel) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. M-MLV reverse transcriptase (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used to synthesize cDNA. Real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed on 384 well plates by QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with PerfeCTa SYBR Green SuperMix Low ROX (Quantabio) and amplification was analyzed by QuantStudio Real-Time PCR software v1.3. Primers for Il1b, Lcn2, Myd88, Reg3b, Rpl19, Tnf and Tnfr1 genes were optimized (see sequences and annealing temperature in Supplementary Table 1). To normalize mRNA expression, the expression of 3 housekeeping genes was measured and Rpl19 was ranked as the best candidate. The mRNA relative quantification was calculated using the ΔΔCt method38, PCR efficiency was always between 90 and 110%.
Flow cytometry
MLNs were dissected post-mortem and collected in PBS. For lymph node cells preparation, organs were mashed through a 70 μm cell strainer (Falcon), washed and stained with CD103 PE fluorochrome-conjugated antibody (Miltenyi Biotech Cat#130-111-685, Dilution 1:100). Fc receptors were blocked with Anti-mCD16/CD32 (BD Cat# 553142, Dilution 1:400) and only events that appeared as singlets were analyzed. Data was acquired through FACSCanto II flow cytometer and FACSDiva software (BD) and analyzed with FlowJo software. The gating strategy is depicted in Supplementary Fig. 2g.
Sorting of IgA+ and IgA− bacteria
Feces were homogenized in PBS and duplicates were made for each sample. Presorting samples were centrifuged and froze at −80 °C. Then, homogenates were blocked with rat serum, stained with PE-conjugated Anti-Mouse IgA (eBioscience Cat#12-4204-82, Dilution 1:100) and subsequently, anti-PE microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec Cat#130-048-801, 20 μl of antibody per 107 total cells) were added. A custom-built 96 well magnetic separator (K&J Magnetics) was used for positive selection, followed by negative selection using MACS multi-96 columns (Miltenyi Biotec).
Fecal DNA extraction and microbiome analysis
Colon content was collected at sacrifice and stored at −80 °C. Fecal DNA from cohousing experiment DNA was isolated using the FavorPrep Stool DNA Isolation Mini kit (Favorgen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was eluted in nuclease-free Hyclone water, measured spectrophotometrically with NanoDrop (Thermofisher) and stored at −20 °C until use.
Phylogenetic based methods targeting the 16S rRNA gene were used as described in Pascual-Itoiz et al. 20205. Microbial populations present in the colon of experimental mice were characterized by sequencing the 16S rRNA amplicons of the fusion V3-V4 region on an Illumina Inc.’s MiSeq. DNA extracts were used as the template for 16S rRNA gene PCR-based amplification with barcoded primer sets. Data processing was performed using QIIME (v.1.9.0): Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology software package39. Sequences were clustered as operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of 97% similarity using UCLUST40. OTUS were checked for chimeras using RDP gold data-base and taxonomy was assigned with the Greengenes database (version 4feb2011)41. Richness (number of observed species) and alpha and beta diversity metrics (Chao1, Shannon index, and phylogenetic Diversity whole tree) were calculated using the QIIME pipeline. We further performed statistical analyses to detect differences in microbial composition between groups with Vegan and DESeq242 packages for R and the Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) tool43. Charts were plotted using several R packages, including phyloseq, ggplot2, ggpubr, reshape2 and qplots among others.
Fecal germ-free mouse DNA samples were extracted with DNeasy PowerSoil Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were eluted in 50ul of nuclease-free Hyclone water and measured spectrophotometrically with NanoDrop. The V4 region of 16S rRNA gene of bacteria genomes was sequenced on Illumina MiSeq using barcoded primers. Data was processed with QIIME244 and microbial diversities and charts were obtained with R phyloseq, ggplot2 and vegan packages. The significant fold changes of OTU’s were obtained with DESeq2.
In IgA-SEQ experiment, presorting, IgA positive and IgA negative samples DNA were isolated using MagAttract Microbial DNA isolation Kit (Qiagen). Samples were lysed by adding glass beads together with the lysis solution and bead beating for 5 minutes. Supernatants were transferred to a new plate and DNA was extracted following the manufacturer’s protocol. For microbial sequencing and analysis, the pipeline used with germ-free mouse colonization fecal DNA samples was followed. IgA coating index (ICI) for each individual bacterial taxon was determined dividing the relative abundance of IgA coated bacteria (IgA+) by the relative abundance of non-coated IgA bacteria (IgA−)10. Since we tested each sample in duplicate, we used the mean of the duplicates for the analysis.
Proteomic analysis
Colon samples from the cohousing experiment were digested following the SP3 protocol described by Hughes et al., (2019) with minor modifications45. Trypsin was added to a trypsin:protein ratio of 1:10, and the mixture was incubated 2 h at 37 °C. The resulting peptides were dried out in a RVC2 25 speedvac concentrator (Christ), and resuspended in 0.1% formic acid.
Samples were analyzed in a hybrid trapped ion mobility spectrometry—quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometer (timsTOF Pro with PASEF, Bruker Daltonics) coupled online to a nanoElute liquid chromatograph (Bruker). This mass spectrometer takes advantage of a scanning mode termed parallel accumulation—serial fragmentation (PASEF), which multiplies the sequencing speed without any loss in sensitivity46 and has been proven to provide outstanding analytical speed and sensibility for proteomics analyses47. Samples (200 ng) were directly loaded in a 15 cm Bruker nanelute FIFTEEN C18 analytical column (Bruker) and resolved at 400 nl/min with a 30 min gradient. The column was heated to 50 °C using an oven. Protein identification and quantification was determined using the PEAKS software using default settings. Searches were carried out against a database consisting of human protein entries (Uniprot/Swissprot), with precursor and fragment tolerances of 20 ppm and 0.05 Da. Only proteins identified with at least two peptides at FDR < 1% were considered for further analysis. Data was loaded onto Perseus platform 2448 and further processed (log2 transformation, imputation).
GO enrichment was tested using the ClusterProfiler bioconductor package49 and comparative graphics were obtained via the dot plot function.
Pearson correlation
Pearson´s correlation analysis to determine the association between the bacterial OTUs and the DAI of each mouse at the end of the cohousing experiment was performed with the Hmisc R package.
HAIIA (Hierarchical All-against-All significance testing) tool was used to identify significant associations between proteins that were statistically different according to WT and MCJ-deficient genotypes upon intestinal inflammation and all microbial OTU´s (https://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/halla).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad software. Results were graphed as line graphs of the mean values and errors, and as box and whisker plots with median, quartiles and range. In the GF experiment, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted for DAI and weight loss values, and the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test was used for colonic length and qPCR results. In the cohousing experiment, the significance between experimental groups was assessed using the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Estibaliz Atondo for her technical support. We thank MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (PID2021-124328OB-I00 -to JA- and CEX2021-001136-S -Severo Ochoa Center of Excellence to CIC bioGUNE). A.P.C. was a fellow at the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) and is currently a postdoctoral fellow funded by the Basque Government. CIC bioGUNE support was provided by the Basque Department of Industry, Tourism and Trade (Etortek and Elkartek Programs), and the Innovation Technology Department of the Bizkaia County.
Author contributions
Conception and design of the study (A.P.C., N.W.P. and L.A.), data collection (A.P.C., D.S., J.C., A.P., M.A.P.I., D.B. and L.A.), data analysis (A.P.C., J.L.L., M.A., F.E., M.F., M.A.P.I., A.M.A. and L.A.), drafting the manuscript (A.P.C. and L.A.), manuscript revision (H.R., N.W.P. and J.A.), statistical analysis (A.P.C., J.L.L., J.A. and L.A.), obtained funding (A.F., N.W.P., J.A. and L.A.), and technical support (I.M.R). All authors approved the final version for publication.
Data availability
Raw sequences used for metagenomics analysis were uploaded to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under project number PRJEB43545 for the IgA experiment, PRJEB43544 for the Germ-Free mice experiment and PRJEB43553 for the cohousing experiment.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Juan Anguita, Email: janguita@cicbiogune.es.
Leticia Abecia, Email: leticia.abecia@ehu.eus.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41522-023-00443-y.
References
- 1.Levy M, Blacher E, Elinav E. Microbiome, metabolites and host immunity. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017;35:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schirmer M, Garner A, Vlamakis H, Xavier RJ. Microbial genes and pathways in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;17:497–511. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0213-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clark A, Mach N. The Crosstalk between the Gut Microbiota and Mitochondria during Exercise. Front Physiol. 2017;8:319. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Haberman Y, et al. Ulcerative colitis mucosal transcriptomes reveal mitochondriopathy and personalized mechanisms underlying disease severity and treatment response. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:38. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07841-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pascual-Itoiz MA, et al. The mitochondrial negative regulator MCJ modulates the interplay between microbiota and the host during ulcerative colitis. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:572. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57348-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hatle KM, et al. MCJ/DnaJC15, an endogenous mitochondrial repressor of the respiratory chain that controls metabolic alterations. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013;33:2302–2314. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00189-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lloyd-Price J, et al. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature. 2019;569:655–662. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1237-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pabst O, Slack E. IgA and the intestinal microbiota: the importance of being specific. Mucosal Immunol. 2020;13:12–21. doi: 10.1038/s41385-019-0227-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pietrzak B, Tomela K, Olejnik-Schmidt A, Mackiewicz A, Schmidt M. Secretory IgA in Intestinal Mucosal Secretions as an Adaptive Barrier against Microbial Cells. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:9254. doi: 10.3390/ijms21239254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Palm NW, et al. Immunoglobulin A coating identifies colitogenic bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell. 2014;158:1000–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vezza T, Abad-Jimenez Z, Marti-Cabrera M, Rocha M, Victor VM. Microbiota-Mitochondria Inter-Talk: A Potential Therapeutic Strategy in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Antioxidants. 2020;9:848. doi: 10.3390/antiox9090848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jackson DN, Theiss AL. Gut bacteria signaling to mitochondria in intestinal inflammation and cancer. Gut Microbes. 2020;11:285–304. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1592421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hall AB, et al. A novel Ruminococcus gnavus clade enriched in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Genome Med. 2017;9:103. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0490-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dovrolis N, et al. The Interplay between Mucosal Microbiota Composition and Host Gene-Expression is Linked with Infliximab Response in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Microorganisms. 2020;8:438. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Elinav E, et al. NLRP6 inflammasome regulates colonic microbial ecology and risk for colitis. Cell. 2011;145:745–757. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brinkman BM, et al. Gut microbiota affects sensitivity to acute DSS-induced colitis independently of host genotype. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2013;19:2560–2567. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0b013e3182a8759a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Iljazovic A, et al. Perturbation of the gut microbiome by Prevotella spp. enhances host susceptibility to mucosal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2021;14:113–124. doi: 10.1038/s41385-020-0296-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shapiro JM, et al. Immunoglobulin A Targets a Unique Subset of the Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:83–93.e83. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Derwa Y, Gracie DJ, Hamlin PJ, Ford AC. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharm. Ther. 2017;46:389–400. doi: 10.1111/apt.14203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tursi A, et al. Treatment of relapsing mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis with the probiotic VSL#3 as adjunctive to a standard pharmaceutical treatment: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2218–2227. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bian X, et al. Administration of Akkermansia muciniphila Ameliorates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:2259. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Round JL, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009;9:313–323. doi: 10.1038/nri2515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Banan A, Fields JZ, Talmage DA, Zhang Y, Keshavarzian A. PKC-beta1 mediates EGF protection of microtubules and barrier of intestinal monolayers against oxidants. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2001;281:G833–G847. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.281.3.G833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Binker MG, Zhao DY, Pang SJ, Harrison RE. Cytoplasmic linker protein-170 enhances spreading and phagocytosis in activated macrophages by stabilizing microtubules. J. Immunol. 2007;179:3780–3791. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.6.3780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vasileva E, Citi S. The role of microtubules in the regulation of epithelial junctions. Tissue Barriers. 2018;6:1539596. doi: 10.1080/21688370.2018.1539596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rodrigues RR, et al. Transkingdom interactions between Lactobacilli and hepatic mitochondria attenuate western diet-induced diabetes. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:101. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20313-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nurrahma BA, et al. Probiotic Supplementation Facilitates Recovery of 6-OHDA-Induced Motor Deficit via Improving Mitochondrial Function and Energy Metabolism. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:668775. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.668775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Xin J, et al. Preventing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through Lactobacillus johnsonii BS15 by attenuating inflammation and mitochondrial injury and improving gut environment in obese mice. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;98:6817–6829. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5752-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tunapong W, et al. Chronic treatment with prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics attenuated cardiac dysfunction by improving cardiac mitochondrial dysfunction in male obese insulin-resistant rats. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018;57:2091–2104. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1482-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nakagawa H, et al. Effects and mechanisms of prolongevity induced by Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell. 2016;15:227–236. doi: 10.1111/acel.12431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bollinger RR, et al. Human secretory immunoglobulin A may contribute to biofilm formation in the gut. Immunology. 2003;109:580–587. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2003.01700.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gevers D, et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn’s disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:382–392. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Walujkar SA, et al. Molecular profiling of mucosal tissue associated microbiota in patients manifesting acute exacerbations and remission stage of ulcerative colitis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018;34:76. doi: 10.1007/s11274-018-2449-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Flannigan KL, Denning TL. Segmented filamentous bacteria-induced immune responses: a balancing act between host protection and autoimmunity. Immunology. 2018;154:537–546. doi: 10.1111/imm.12950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Morgan XC, et al. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R79. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-9-r79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Stepankova R, et al. Segmented filamentous bacteria in a defined bacterial cocktail induce intestinal inflammation in SCID mice reconstituted with CD45RBhigh CD4+ T cells. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2007;13:1202–1211. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Camuesco D, et al. The intestinal anti-inflammatory effect of quercitrin is associated with an inhibition in iNOS expression. Br. J. Pharm. 2004;143:908–918. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Caporaso JG, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McDonald D, et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 2012;6:610–618. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Segata N, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bolyen E, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hughes CS, et al. Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments. Nat. Protoc. 2019;14:68–85. doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0082-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Meier F, et al. Parallel Accumulation-Serial Fragmentation (PASEF): Multiplying Sequencing Speed and Sensitivity by Synchronized Scans in a Trapped Ion Mobility Device. J. Proteome Res. 2015;14:5378–5387. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Meier F, et al. Online Parallel Accumulation-Serial Fragmentation (PASEF) with a Novel Trapped Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometer. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2018;17:2534–2545. doi: 10.1074/mcp.TIR118.000900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tyanova S, et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:731–740. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16:284–287. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw sequences used for metagenomics analysis were uploaded to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under project number PRJEB43545 for the IgA experiment, PRJEB43544 for the Germ-Free mice experiment and PRJEB43553 for the cohousing experiment.